Synthesis and properties of polymer electrolytes based on polyurethane elastomer and lithium salts published by Ural Federal University eISSN 2411-1414 chimicatechnoacta.ru LETTER 2023, vol. 10(3), No. 202310311 DOI: 10.15826/chimtech.2023.10.3.11 1 of 5 Synthesis and properties of polymer electrolytes based on polyurethane elastomer and lithium salts Nikita Fedorov * , Artem Ulihin , Nikolai Uvarov Institute of Solid State Chemistry and Mechanochemistry SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia * Corresponding author: f-nikita08@mail.ru This paper belongs to the RKFM'23 Special Issue: https://chem.conf.nstu.ru/. Guest Editors: Prof. N. Uvarov and Prof. E. Aubakirov. Abstract Polymer solid electrolytes were obtained by swelling the polyurethane elastomer with solutions of lithium salts LiBF4 and LiClO4 in DMSO at dif- ferent concentration of lithium salt. The swelling effect was found to de- crease with the increase in the salt concentration, whereas the ionic con- ductivity has a maximum of 6–8·10–4 S/cm at 5 wt.% lithium salt. The salt solutions incorporated into the polymer pores have melting points ranging from –10 to 2 °C and deswelling takes place at low temperatures. The ob- tained polyurethane elastomer materials have a high conductivity and may be promising for use in flexible lithium polymer batteries. Keywords polymer solid electrolytes polyurethane elastomer swelling effect ionic conductivity effect of the salt concentration on swelling and conductivity Received: 12.07.23 Revised: 13.08.23 Accepted: 22.08.23 Available online: 24.08.23 © 2023, the Authors. This article is published in open access under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). 1. Introduction Lithium batteries have gained high importance at present. They are widely used in portable electronic devices, elec- tric vehicles, various energy storage applications and other fields due to their high energy density and excellent service life [1–3]. However, safety concerns because of the growth of lithium dendrites and the resulting short circuit when using liquid electrolytes significantly complicate further development and limit their use. An alternative so- lution could be to replace the liquid electrolyte with a solid polymer electrolyte (SPE). In addition, this would help to solve the problems of fire and explosion in liquid electro- lytes using organic solvents [4–7]. Ionic conductivity of polymer solid electrolytes occurs via flexible fragments that form an amorphous subsystem (so-called gel phase), whereas hard fragments form crys- talline regions of the polymer [3–7]. There are several ap- proaches to increasing the concentration of the amor- phous phase: the variation of the concentration or chemi- cal composition of linking functional groups, and the in- troduction of heterogeneous additives, such as carbon nanotubes or oxide fillers. Swelling of electrolyte solu- tions may also result in a considerable increase in the con- centration of gel phase and the increase in the conductivity [12]. In this case the swelling should not lead to the loss of the mechanical stability of the polymer. Polyurethane is a promising material as a matrix for creating solid polymer electrolytes. This material has flex- ible structural designs, can be easily modified (with poly- mers or fillers), and possesses specific functions (self- healing, protective layer or high adhesion). Owing to these characteristics, it is possible to obtain a higher energy density and use a metal lithium anode in batteries. To date, to our knowledge, most polyurethane-based solid polymer electrolytes have been synthesized using chain extenders, catalysts, and organic solvents, followed by a complex polymerization process. Genier et al. [9] synthesized a polymer based on poly- tetrahydrofuran (PTHF) and epoxy resin using a cationic initiator and a photo-initiator. The resulting polymer was impregnated in a LiBF4 salt solution in acetonitrile, fol- lowed by drying to constant weight. Despite the long and complicated manufacturing process, the authors managed to obtain a material with ionic conductivity from 8.9·10–6 to 7.8·10–4 S/cm, stability over a wide temperature range, and mechanical strength. Another promising approach to the preparation of solid polymer electrolytes was demon- strated by Zhao et al. [10], who synthesized a pre-polymer by mixing toluene diisocyanate with polypropylene glycol with the addition of the LiTFSI salt dissolved in dimethyl http://chimicatechnoacta.ru/ https://doi.org/10.15826/chimtech.2023.10.3.11 mailto:xx@yy.zz http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9192-2075 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6795-0006 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8209-7533 https://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=https://doi.org/10.15826/chimtech.2023.10.3.11domain=pdf&date_stamp=2023-08-24 Chimica Techno Acta 2023, vol. 10(3), No. 202310311 LETTER 2 of 5 DOI: 10.15826/chimtech.2023.10.3.11 carbonate to the resulting mixture. A chain extender and a catalyst were added to the obtained pre-polymers, after which they were poured into moulds for 7 days until com- plete polymerization. They managed to achieve the maxi- mum ionic conductivity of 9.6·10–5 S/cm at 55 °C. In addi- tion, the polymer electrolyte had good chain flexibility and thermal stability. In this work, polyurethane-based ion-conducting poly- mer electrolytes were prepared using a commercially available pre-polymer based on p-phenylene diisocyanate (P-PDI) and polyether, 3,3'-dichloro-4,4'-diaminodiphe- nylmethane (MOCA) curing agent, and lithium salts, LiBF4 and LiClO4, dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (CH3)2SO (DMSO) by elastomer swelling in solutions with different concentrations of lithium salts. The ionic conductivity of the obtained polymer electrolytes was investigated. 2. Experimental A quantity of the ADIPRENE® LFP 1950A, a PPDI termi- nated polyester prepolymer (Crompton Corporation), heated to 50 °C was mixed with a given amount of the MOCA hardener (3,3'-dichloro-4,4'-diaminodiphenylme- thane C12H12N2Cl2, chemically pure, manufactured by JIANGSU XINGYUAN CHEMICAL CO LTD) heated to 110 °C using a DISPERMAT CN Dissolver at 2000 rpm for 30 s for degassing. Next, the resulting liquid mixture was poured into a metal mould and heated for 1 h at 110 °C. Then the mould was cooled to room temperature, and the sample was removed and condensed for 7 days before experi- ments. The synthesis scheme is presented in Figure 1. Before preparing electrolytes, lithium salts were dried under low vacuum at 150 °C for 24 h. Next, electrolytes were prepared in DMSO with a given concentration of lith- ium salts. Swelling of polymers with solutions of lithium salts was carried out in a hermetically sealed vessel for 48 h. Conductivity measurements were carried out in an argon atmosphere using a two-electrode scheme in the frequency range 25 Hz – 1 MHz using an MNIPI E-25 Im- mittance Meter. Conductivity values were determined from the analysis of Nyquist plots. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was performed on a DSC 204 F1 Phoenix NETZSCH instrument (Germany). Aluminum (Al) crucibles for analysis were pre-calcined at 100 °C. The samples were cooled from 25 °C to –40 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min, kept at –40 °C for 10 min to balance the calorimeter sys- tem, then heated to 60 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min. The anal- ysis was carried out under the argon (Ar) flow at a rate of 100 ml/min. 3. Results and Discussion At first, the attempts were made to introduce the lithium salt LiBF4 and LiClO4 directly into the elastomer matrix on heating of the polymer-salt mixtures. As pure salt turned to be insoluble in the polymer, the experiments were per- formed on swelling the polymer matrix with the solutions of LiBF4 and LiClO4 in DMSO. The swelling effect was esti- mated by the relative change in the polymer mass after the storage of the polymer in the solutions LiBF4 or LiClO4 with different concentrations of the salt. The mass of the samples was measured every hour until the constant mass achieved. Results of the swelling experiments are shown in Figure 2. As can be seen, the weight gain monotonically decreases by about 10 times with the increase in the salt concentration in the solutions of LiBF4 or LiClO4 in DMSO from 1 to 15%. This effect was observed earlier for poly- electrolyte hydrogels [10, 11] and can be explained in terms of the modified Flory and Rehner theory [14–16] by the interplay between the entropy contribution, osmotic pressure of the solvent and the salt, and the mechanical strain of the polymeric network caused by the incorpora- tion of the salt solution [14–16]. Therefore, to achieve the highest lithium content in the polymer, solutions with a moderately high concentration of lithium salts should be used. Figure 1 The scheme of the synthesis of polyurethane elastomer, used for the preparation of the polymer solid electrolytes. https://doi.org/10.15826/chimtech.2023.10.3.11 https://doi.org/10.15826/chimtech.2023.10.3.11 Chimica Techno Acta 2023, vol. 10(3), No. 202310311 LETTER 3 of 5 DOI: 10.15826/chimtech.2023.10.3.11 Ionic conductivity data for polymer electrolytes ob- tained after the swelling are presented in Figure 3. The de- pendences of the conductivity on the salt concentration in the LiBF4 or LiClO4 solutions used for swelling have a pro- nounced maximum at 5 wt.% of the salt, both for the lith- ium tetrafluoroborate and lithium perchlorate. The pres- ence of the maximum can be explained by the competition between two factors: an increase in the total content of lith- ium in the solution introduced into the bulk of the polymer during swelling, and a decrease in the total amount of the solution entering the polymer with an increase in the salt con- centration. The maximum conductivity of polymers obtained by swelling in solutions of lithium salts was 8.6·10–4 S/cm and 9.1·10–4 S/cm at 25 °C for LiBF4 and LiClO4 salts, respec- tively. A change in temperature from 25 to 75 °C does not have a significant effect on the ionic conductivity of solid pol- ymer electrolytes, which is associated with a low value of the activation energy of conductivity of 0.13±0.03 eV. Low values of the activation energy suggest that the con- ductivity of the polymers under study is caused by a liquid- like gel phase formed in the pores of the polymer as a result of the swelling of salt solutions in DMSO. In order to inves- tigate thermodynamic properties of the electrolyte phase in polymers, thermal analysis studies were carried out. Figure 4 shows thermal analysis curves obtained for pure DMSO, initial LiBF4 solutions in DMSO, and the polymers after swelling with LiBF4-DMSO solutions of different concentra- tions. The heat effect observed on the heating relates to the melting of DMSO or LiBF4-DMSO solutions, as the pure pol- ymer melts at temperatures above 150 °C with partial de- composition. As seen from Figure 5, the intensity of the peak related to the melting process monotonically de- creases with the LiBF4 concentration. Comparison of these data with those presented in Figure 2 suggests that the peak intensity changes proportionally to the total amount of the LiBF4-DMSO solution absorbed by the polymer matrix as a result of the swelling. The fraction of the amorphous gel phase also decreases with the LiBF4 concentration, leading to the decrease in the ionic conductivity. Figure 2 The dependence of the relative change of the elastomer mass on the concentration of LiBF4 in the source solution. Figure 3 The dependences of the conductivity of polymer electro- lytes on the salt concentration in solutions of LiBF4 (a) or LiClO4 (b) used for swelling the polymer. Figure 4 Thermal analysis curves obtained for (a) pure DMSO (curve 1) and LiBF4-DMSO solutions containing 5 and 10 wt.% LiBF4 (curves 2 and 3, respectively); (b) pure DMSO (curve 1) and poly- mers after swelling with pure DMSO (curve 2) and LiBF4-DMSO so- lutions containing 5, 7, 10 and 15 wt.% LiBF4 (curves 3, 4, 5 and 6, respectively). https://doi.org/10.15826/chimtech.2023.10.3.11 https://doi.org/10.15826/chimtech.2023.10.3.11 Chimica Techno Acta 2023, vol. 10(3), No. 202310311 LETTER 4 of 5 DOI: 10.15826/chimtech.2023.10.3.11 Figure 5 The dependence of the relative change H/H0 of the melt- ing enthalpy of LiBF4-DMSO solutions included into the polymer matrix (H0 is the melting enthalpy of pure DMSO in the polymer) on the concentration of LiBF4 in the source solution. The melting temperatures of LiBF4 solutions are lower than that of pure DMSO, which is typical for solvent-salt systems. The incorporation of pure DMSO into the polymer pores during swelling leads to a noticeable decrease in its melting temperature: the peak temperature of the heat ef- fect related to the melting shifts from 16.7 to 5.6 °C. Such decrease may be explained by a size effect, as an effective “particle” size of DMSO is limited by the volume of pores occupied by DMSO in the polymer matrix. In contrast to pure DMSO, melting temperatures of the salt solutions lo- cated in the polymer are close to those for the initial solu- tions. Moreover, the melting peak splits into two compo- nents. It is known that swelling effect increases with tem- perature [12, 15–17], hence on cooling the effect should van- ish. Therefore, experimentally observed thermal analysis data suggest that partial or complete deswelling of the so- lutions takes place at low temperatures. 4. Limitations The present study is an initial stage of a complex investiga- tion of polymer solid electrolytes based on polyurethane elastomers. These investigations should include: – optimization of the polymer structure by variation of the concentration of the cross-linking agent. It will allow one to control the internal free volume, elastic properties of the polymer and its ionic conductivity; – study of the swelling of other salts with different cat- ions or anions. In particular, it would be of interest to study a series of lithium salts with cosmotropic and chaotropic anions [18] and their influence upon the swelling behaviour and ionic conductivity of the polymer solid electrolytes con- taining these salts; – investigation of ionic conductivity of polymer electro- lytes in a wide temperature range, especially at low tem- peratures. Such experiments would give information on the glass transitions of amorphous states of ionic salts in poly- mers, on deswelling processes, and could also enable estimating the possibilities of the practical applications of the polymer solid electrolytes in flexible lithium batteries. 5. Conclusions In this work polymer solid electrolytes were obtained by swelling the polyurethane elastomer with solutions of lith- ium salts LiBF4 and LiClO4 in DMSO at different concentra- tion of lithium salt. The swelling effect was observed for pure DMSO and was found to decrease with the increase in the salt concentration, whereas the ionic conductivity has a maximum at 5 wt.% lithium salt. The salt incorporated into the polymer pores has a melting temperature ranging from –10 to 2 °C. At low temperatures the deswelling effect seems to be present. Nevertheless, the polymer electrolytes obtained in this work have a high ionic conductivity of nearly 10–3 S/cm that is comparable with the best polyure- thane elastomer analogues [19, 20]. Thus, the obtained pol- yurethane elastomer membranes showed a high ionic con- ductivity at room temperature and may be promising for use in flexible lithium polymer batteries. ● Supplementary materials No supplementary materials are available. ● Funding The work is supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, the State As- signment No. 121032500065-5. ● Acknowledgments The authors thank Kristina Marchenko for carrying out the thermal analysis experiments. ● Author contributions Conceptualization: N.U. Data curation: A.U. Formal Analysis: N.U, A.U Investigation: N.F. Methodology: A.U. Project administration: N.U. Supervision: N.U. Validation: N.U., A.U. Writing – original draft: N.F. Writing – review & editing: N.U. ● Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest. ● Additional information Author IDs: Artem Ulihin, Scopus ID 15046088200; https://doi.org/10.15826/chimtech.2023.10.3.11 https://doi.org/10.15826/chimtech.2023.10.3.11 https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=15046088200 Chimica Techno Acta 2023, vol. 10(3), No. 202310311 LETTER 5 of 5 DOI: 10.15826/chimtech.2023.10.3.11 Nikolai Uvarov, Scopus ID 7006949152. Website: Institute of Solid State Chemistry and Mechanochemis- try SB RAS, http://www.solid.nsc.ru/. References 1. Armand M, Tarascon JM. Building better batteries. Nat. 2008;451(7179):652–657. doi:10.1038/451652a 2. Dunn B, Kamath H, Tarascon JM. Electrical energy storage for the grid a battery of choices. Sci. 2011;334(6058):928–935. doi:10.1126/science1212741 3. Zhou Q, Ma J, Dong S, Li X, Cui G. Intermolecular chemistry in solid polymer electrolytes for high-energy-density lithium batteries. Adv Mater. 2019;31(50):1902029. doi:10.1002/adma.201902029 4. Zhang D, Meng X, Hou W, Hu W, Mo J, Yang T, Zhang W, Fan Q, Liu L, Jiang B, Chu L, Li M. Solid polymer electrolytes Ion conduction mechanisms and enhancement strategies. Nano Res Energy. 2023;2:e9120050. doi:10.26599/NRE.2023.9120050 5. Agrawal RC, Pandey GP. Solid polymer electrolytes: materials designing and all-solid-state battery applications an overview. Phys. 2008;41(22):223001. doi:10.1088/0022- 3727/41/22/223001 6. Quartarone E, Mustarelli P. Electrolytes for solid-state lithium rechargeable batteries: recent advances and perspectives. Chem Soc Rev. 2011;40:2525–2540. doi:10.1039/C0CS00081G 7. Rosero D, Meneses J, Uribe-Kaffure R. Composite polymer electrolytes based on (PEO)4CF3COOLi and multi-walled car- bon nanotube (MWCNT). Polym. 2023;15(1):49. doi:10.3390/polym15010049 8. Sun C, Liu J, Gong Y, Wilkinson D, Zhang J. Recent advances in all-solid-state rechargeable lithium batteries. Nano Energy. 2017;33:363–386. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.01.028 9. Francielli S, Barna J, Wang J, Biria S, Ian D. Solid polymer electrolyte from photo-crosslinked polytetrahydrofuran and a cycloaliphatic epoxide for lithium-ion conduction. MRS Ad- vances. 2020;5:2467–2476. doi:10.1557/adv.2020.274 10. Zhao H, Zhang W, Yin X, Wu Y, Du C, Zhao W, Zhaoab L, Liu C. Conductive polyurethane elastomer electrolyte (PUEE) mate- rials for anodic bonding. RSC Advances. 2020;10:13267– 13276. doi:10.1039/c9ra10944g 11. Gupta NV, Shivakumar HG. Investigation of swelling behavior and mechanical properties of a pH-sensitive superporous hy- drogel composite. Iran J Pharmac Res. 2012;11(2):481–493 doi:10.22037/IJPR.2012.1097 12. Victorov A, Radke C, Prausnitz J. Molecular thermodynamics for swelling of a mesoscopic ionomer gel in 1:1 salt solutions. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2006;8:264–278. doi:10.1039/b512748c 13. Miguel I, Rosero D, Nori M, Meneses J, Uribe Kaffure R. Ther- mal properties of composite polyme relectrolytes poly(eth- ylene oxide) sodium trifluoroacetate aluminum oxide (PEO)10CF3COONa + x wt.% Al2O3. Mater. 2019;12(9):1464. doi:10.3390/ma12091464 14. Dimitriyev MS, Chang YW, Goldbart PM, Nieves AF. Swelling thermodynamics and phase transitions of polymer gels. Nano Futures. 2019;3(4):042001. doi:10.1088/2399-1984/ab45d5 15. Wilcox KG, Kozawa SK, Morozova S. Fundamentals and me- chanics of polyelectrolyte gels: Thermodynamics, swelling, scattering, and elasticity. Chem Phys Rev. 2021;2(4):041309 doi:10.1063/5.0048152 16. Okumura D, Chester SA. Ultimate swelling described by limit- ing chain extensibility of swollen elastomers. Int J Mechan Sci. 2018;144:531–539. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.06.011 17. Yu Y, Landis C.M, Huang R. Salt-Induced Swelling and Volume Phase Transition of Polyelectrolyte Gels. J Appl Mechanics. 2017;84(5):051005. doi:10.1115/1.4036113 18. Kou R, Zhang J, Wang T, Liu G. Interactions between polyelec- trolyte brushes and hofmeister ions chaotropes versus kosmo- tropes. Langmuir. 2015;31(38):10461−10469. doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b02698 19. Son H, Woo HS, Park VS, Min JY, Kim DW. Polyurethane-based elastomeric polymer electrolyte for lithium metal polymer cells with enhanced thermal safety. Electrochem Soc. 2020;167(8):080525. doi:10.1149/1945-7111/ab8ed2 20. Zhang Q, Wena Y, Liu K, Liu N, Du Y, Mac C, Zhou L, Liang Y, Jin Y. Study of solid polyurethane electrolytes synthesized from HDI and PEO of different molecular weight. Electroanal Chem.2021;893:115305. doi:10.1016/j.jelechem.2021.115305 https://doi.org/10.15826/chimtech.2023.10.3.11 https://doi.org/10.15826/chimtech.2023.10.3.11 https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=7006949152 http://www.solid.nsc.ru/ https://doi.org/10.1038/451652a https://doi.org/10.1126/science1212741 https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201902029 https://doi.org/10.26599/NRE.2023.9120050 https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/41/22/223001 https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/41/22/223001 https://doi.org/10.1039/C0CS00081G https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15010049 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.01.028 https://doi.org/10.1557/adv.2020.274 https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ra10944g https://doi.org/10.22037/IJPR.2012.1097 https://doi.org/10.1039/b512748c https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12091464 https://doi.org/10.1088/2399-1984/ab45d5 https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0048152 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.06.011 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4036113 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b02698 https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ab8ed2 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2021.115305