EDITORIAL                          

             

May 2016. Christian Journal for Global Health, 3(1):3-10.     

Theological foundations for an effective Christian response to 

the global disease burden in resource-constrained regions 

Daniel W. O’Neill
a
 

a
MD, MA(TS), Managing Editor, CJGH; Assistant Professor of Family Medicine, University of Connecticut School 

of Medicine, USA 

Introduction 
Given the global spread of Christianity, 

Christians are in a critical position to effect radical 

change in individuals, communities, and systems 

for human flourishing and confront the global 

disease burden, injustice, and resource disparity 

that exists in the world.  The increasing presence, 

activity, and faithfulness of Christians among all 

peoples are necessary both for improved global 

health equity as well as the universal receiving of 

God’s healing message.  As an expanding move-

ment, the Church has an increasing opportunity to 

define health, speak truth, provide care, make 

peace, cooperate, set priorities, and mobilize 

resources for maximum stewardship in low 

resource settings.   

Theological Correctives 
Understanding the theological roots of our 

Christian calling to be a healing community is 

vital to an effective and sustainable response to the 

current complexities of the global burden of 

disease in resource-constrained regions.  Serving 

God who is the Healer, Comforter, Revealer, 

Reconciler, Sufferer, and Redeemer, we ground 

our response in the very character and actions of 

God.  His justice and mercy is revealed in his 

actions in history and reflected in his call to social 

justice and mercy among the poor and afflicted (Ps 

82:3; Prov 31:9; Jer 22:16; Mat 10:8).  His call to 

stewardship of limited resources and opposition to 

greed and partiality is corrective to the waste and 

favoritism found in many global health systems 

(Lev 19:15; Col 3:5).  The high value of all human 

life, as made in the image of God, drives his 

people to protect and care for the most vulnerable 

populations of all races such as the under-

resourced, the unborn, the disabled, and the elderly 

at a time when materialist utilitarian ethics and 

eugenics are still persuasive forces in a world of 

exponential global population growth (Gen 1:27).
1
  

Jesus’ model of compassionate care-giving to 

individuals (sparrows) as well as populations 

(crowds) in Matthew 9 affirms both curative care 

and public health interventions toward human 

health and well-being, in contrast to purely 

scientific and rational approaches driven by data.  

The concept of new covenant modeled in God’s 

character and laws counter an increasingly 

impersonal, technologically driven, and mal-

distributed $6.6 trillion global healthcare industry 

(2 Cor 3:6).   

Global Inequalities and Opportunities 
There is an estimated shortage of 4.3 million 

health professionals globally, and 57 of the poorest 

countries in the world have disproportionately 

severe shortages.  One billion people have no 

access at all to a trained heath worker.  Sub-

Saharan Africa has the lowest ratio of trained 

health workers and the greatest burden of disease.  

There are also marked inequities within each 

country with rural areas having the least access, 

underlining a call for more innovative system-

based education to meet the demands.
2
  

There is a similar maldistribution of Church 

resources among the unreached and unengaged 



4  O’Neill 
 

May 2016. Christian Journal for Global Health, 3(1):3-10.          
 

peoples of the world.  Over 2 billion people are 

living in 4,841 people groups with very few, if 

any, Christ-followers.
3  

The value added to the 

health of communities when the Church is planted 

is inestimable.  As communities flourish, there is 

increased opportunity for the message of the 

saving grace of God to be heard.  The ultimate 

divine goal and the end of history include every 

tribe, tongue, and nation in the manifest blessing 

of God’s presence (Rev 7:9).  The leaves of the 

currently inaccessible tree of life are for the 

healing of all nations without exception (Rev 

22:2); so neglect of a systemic, cooperative 

movement to proclaim this healing message and 

plant healing communities everywhere is off track 

with the purposes of God.  This can be thought of 

as a pursuit of universal health coverage. 

As the Church has expanded globally, and 

has increasing human and material resources in the 

global South, she has positioned herself as a 

potential influencer for health, particularly among 

the poor where Christianity has “a breathtaking 

ability to transform weakness into strength.”
4
  

There are several ways in which the Church can 

lead in the contemporary global health enterprise.  

Each of these can be grounded in a robust 

theology informed by perspectives from the 

globalized Church. 

 

Defining Health 
The biblical definition of health is more 

expansive than the broad generalization from the 

World Health Organization (WHO) and involves 

restored wholesome relationships with: 

1.  self  —  image, self-care, purpose, meaning  

2. others — peace-making, intimacy, family 

integrity, care for neighbor, equality, 

forgiveness, just societies 

3. nature — environmental harmony, clean 

water, nutrition, medicines, micro and macro-

organisms 

4. the Creator — reconciliation, intimacy, and  

presence.   

Health was the complete state described in 

Genesis 2 and corrupted in Genesis 3 and is the 

complete state to be gained in the consummation 

of a new heavens and earth (Isaiah 66:22; Rev 

21:1).  This state is best described with the 

Hebrew word shalom and can be approximated 

and pursued earnestly between these two bookends 

of history.
5
  Worshiping communities seek to 

embody this principle of harmony, but have often 

fallen short in practice.  When limited definitions 

of health are pursued, limited solutions are 

applied.  Technical and material solutions to moral 

and spiritual problems are insufficient — they are 

not sustainable.  The extent to which Christ-

followers seek to flesh out the fullest definition of 

health in public conversations is the degree to 

which more effective and sustainable solutions 

will bring true lasting and widespread 

transformation to the nations.   

If human flourishing necessitates a coalesce-

ence of well-being in these four areas, then global 

health promotion requires engagement with 

concepts of identity and purpose, ecological 

stewardship, environmental dominion, economic 

consciousness, justice in governmental and non-

governmental systems, and reconciliation with 

God.  The HIV pandemic highlights the 

multifaceted effects of such a disease burden on 

whole communities and nations — affecting 

economic, social, physical, and emotional 

livelihood — “an evil that tears at the very heart of 

human life on God’s earth.”
6  

This and the myriad 

of other diseases & infirmities globally are 

tangible expressions of the corruption of the 

planet, the often indiscriminate and far-reaching 

effects of sin, and the inter-relatedness of all 

aspects of life.  The divine healing intent toward 

human well-being and the purpose of the gathered 

community as the “face of healing in the world” 

are manifestations of His grace.
7
  The gospel 

provides a tangible expression of the only hope for 

complete healing, and the holistic mission of the 

Church must include engagement with all four of 



5  O’Neill 
 

May 2016. Christian Journal for Global Health, 3(1):3-10.          
 

these areas to promote sustainable movements 

toward health and human flourishing.  

Speaking Truth 
As Revealer, God not only reveals Himself 

in the inspired Word, but also in the magnificence 

of the created order and through His Spirit.  

Creating the material world as knowable, He calls 

us to apply science and observation in a rational 

and empirical way to address human problems.  

Exploring the mysteries of causation and 

following evidence-based interventions is an 

exercise of dominion over the natural world.  

Discerning solid realities from myths, while at the 

same time not denying spiritual truths, creates a 

full-orbed approach to human affliction.  As He 

spoke the world into existence and the Scriptures 

into writing, so He calls his people to speak the 

truth in love, to provoke one another toward love 

and good deeds, and to teach and admonish with 

all wisdom (Eph 4:15; Heb 10:24; Col 1:24).  This 

means that skills, best practices, and reflections 

must be shared — growing and learning together 

toward the goal of God-honoring improvements in 

global health.
8 
 

As Creator, God mandated the naming of 

every creature, (Gen 2:19) and Jesus named 

demons (Mark 5:9), casting them out when 

necessary (Mark 16:17).  Likewise, humans 

participate in identifying the cause of diseases, 

pursuing a cure or prevention when possible.  

These include more than pathogenic micro-

organisms or genetic mutations.  Increasingly, the 

diseases of excess, addiction, and meaninglessness 

are affecting low and middle-income countries 

(LMICs) — the non-communicable diseases 

(NCDs).  Three quarters of the 38 million deaths 

per year from NCDs are in LMICs.
9
  With 

economic development and globalization have 

come unhealthy food access, sedentary lifestyles, 

urbanization, motor vehicle trauma, disordered 

mental health, and markets of addictive 

substances.  Biblical injunctions against gluttony, 

drunkenness, inordinate pleasures, abuse, violence, 

and laziness are truths that are increasingly 

recognized to have widespread health impact in 

communities.  Neglect of nurture and bonding in 

infants also has major effects on public health.
10

  

Naming these causes of chronic illness and 

disability by looking at the evidence and 

addressing the systems which promote them are 

part of fulfilling this mandate.   

Providing Care 
 A sincere longing for personal and family 

well-being is an innate drive of humans who retain 

the image of God and long for wholeness, but is 

often exploited by the healthcare industry or 

denied by oppressive social, governmental, or 

religious systems.
11,12

  Caution must be given not 

to allow the idolatry of physical health and safety 

(the diseases we fear) or the idolatry of trusting in 

technological healthcare systems or governments 

or organizations (the things we trust) to replace 

abiding trust in the living “God who heals.” (Ex 

15:26)
5
  Healthcare contextualized to the culture is 

of supreme importance, such as affirming African 

traditions of a dying process surrounded by family 

at home instead of a hospital.
13

  The care rendered 

by Jesus was exceptionally compassionate, 

personalized, indiscriminate, holistic, contextual, 

and self-sacrificial.  He expects no less from His 

followers, who have unprecedented opportunity to 

retain and embody agape other-centeredness in 

contextualized care for the afflicted and work 

toward justice in all areas of life.  After Pentecost, 

the Holy Spirit as Comforter empowers believers 

to comfort others with a care and concern that is 

unnatural and transformational (2 Cor 1:4). A 

more robust theological understanding of God as 

Healer will empower the Church to follow in 

Jesus’ footsteps in the power of the Spirit as 

caregivers. 

Making Peace 
The Church’s mandate to be a blessing to all 

nations, founded on the promise to Abraham in 

Genesis 12, is a means to counter the curse on the 



6  O’Neill 
 

May 2016. Christian Journal for Global Health, 3(1):3-10.          
 

earth and begin to restore shalom on the planet.  

Peacemaking is a divine movement to work amid 

corruption to restore shalom within individuals, 

between people and nations, with the environment, 

and with our Creator.  As ministers of 

reconciliation, we participate in God’s work of 

reconciling the whole of creation to Himself (2 

Cor 5:18-19).  Beyond proclaiming peace with 

God through Jesus Christ, this call to the Church 

includes mental and physical health promotion and 

care, and extends to promote peace in areas of 

tribal, gender, class, and ethnic conflict.  Those 

who sow in peace reap a harvest of righteousness 

(justice) in communities impacted by their 

presence (James 3:18).  This peace is not made 

with principalities and powers bent on destruction 

and the devaluation of human life such as 

pathogenic microorganisms and unjust oppressive 

systems.  Rather, peace is made with that which is 

redeemable:  restored self-identity and the 

discipline of self-care; favorable pathogens in our 

microbiome and soil; the land’s crops and animal 

resources; geological and ecological balances; 

right relationships in our family and neighbors; 

witness in communities; affirmation of wholesome 

ethnic traditions and international harmony to 

reduce civil conflict.   

Cooperating Broadly 
Though the Church is designed to embody 

the fullness of truth, she does not have a monopoly 

on the truth.  There was wisdom in the men of the 

east in Solomon’s day (1 Kings 4:30), the Queen 

of Sheba was thought able to judge the generation 

of Jesus’ day (Matt 12:42), and the Cretan poets 

were true in their self-assessment of unhealthy 

practices in Paul’s day (Titus 1:12-13).  If God can 

call Nebuchadnezzar His servant (Jer 25:9) and 

move the heart of Cyrus (Ezra 1:1), could He not 

also use governments and other global health 

actors to accomplish His purposes for the health of 

the nations?  Could the Church consider greater 

levels of cooperation to help build health systems 

through ministries of health in LMICs?
14

 

Lancet published a series of articles in June 

2015 that showed the important role the Church 

plays in healthcare delivery, particularly in areas 

poorly served by governmental resources.  They 

called for greater cooperation and mutual 

recognition between governmental organizations 

and faith-based organizations (FBOs).
15 

 Though 

Jesus recognized that the people of this world are 

more shrewd than the people of the light (Lk 

16:8), He also called His disciples to be as shrewd 

as serpents and innocent as doves (Mt 10:16).  

There are times when the wisdom of the world 

uninformed by God’s Spirit and Word will be 

foolishness (1 Cor 1:20-25) and that powers 

designed to promote human flourishing may be 

corrupted and end up constraining it.  However, 

the Church must witness to those powers, 

working, in the words of N.T. Wright, cheerfully 

“with the grain of good will” with people of all 

faiths or no faith in the art of “collaboration 

without compromise and of opposition without 

dualism.”
16 

This requires deep trust in the 

sovereignty and immanence of God in all aspects 

of life, relying not on human wisdom alone but on 

God’s power to see true transformation and 

reconciliation (1 Cor 2:5).   

Interdenominational dialog and recognition 

of the charismatic nature of the global Church in 

the majority world will be necessary for a unified 

approach to transformation.  Understanding that 

among the grassroots poor in Asia, for example, 

Christ is seen not as political liberator as in Latin 

American liberation theology or among the elites, 

but as liberator from fear and fatalism caused by 

centuries of internalizing the law of karma, from 

fear of spirits, from demonic oppression 

(perceived or real), and through healing of 

diseases — especially when access to modern 

health care is limited or unattainable.
17

  Offering 

what Samuel Escobar called “transforming 

service” validates and confirms the truth and 

fullness of the gospel message.
18

 

 



7  O’Neill 
 

May 2016. Christian Journal for Global Health, 3(1):3-10.          
 

Setting Priorities 
Jesus modeled the priority of touch and the 

spoken word in healing the sick and integrated the 

redemption of the whole person — not resorting to 

its reductionist parts, nor to purely technical 

solutions.  Primary Health Care, embraced in the 

1978 Alma Ata Declaration through the influence 

of the Christian Medical Commission, and 

reiterated in 2008 by the WHO, can be embraced 

and enhanced for greater global distribution.
19

  

Christians can continue to influence goal-setting as 

they did with the Millennium Development Goals 

(MDGs) and become more engaged to inform 

decisions for the next 15 years and beyond. 

`This year, the new Sustainable Develop-

ment Goals (SDGs) bring a new level of 

sophistication in seeking to be inclusive of many 

interrelated elements that contribute to human 

health, development, and also to planetary well-

being.  Focusing on the complexities of systems, 

this goal-setting is explicitly calling for 

“transforming our world.”
 20

  To presume this can 

be accomplished without the transforming 

presence of Christ and his followers is wishful 

thinking.   

While both the WHO definition of health 

and the SDGs seem utopian, there is value in 

setting goals for human flourishing and ecological 

stewardship as part of the cultural mandate of 

Genesis 1:27-28.  Cooperating with all global 

health actors with similar goals, Christians can 

participate in praying and acting toward these 

preferable futures.  The third SDG is to “ensure 

healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all 

ages.”
 21

  This includes continuation of the MDGs 

for reduced maternal and child mortality, access to 

essential medications, and control or eradication of 

infectious diseases, but adds goals to reduce non-

communicable diseases, mental illness, tobacco 

and drug abuse, environmental hazards, and to 

enhance work-force and health systems along with 

global health threat preparation.  Resources, such 

as the Disease Control Priorities (DCP-3), help 

countries improve health using evidence-based 

approaches in low-resource settings.
22

  Setting 

priorities based on Jesus’ statement, “It is not the 

well who need a doctor but the sick” (Luke 5:31) 

and Paul’s ambition to make Christ known where 

He is not (Rom 15:20) will help us focus on the 

poorest, most vulnerable, and most infirm among 

global populations and the people-groups who 

have not yet experienced the presence of His 

people or His word in their own language and 

cultural context.  This can be thought of as 

working toward global health equity. 

 

Mobilizing Resources for Maximum 
Stewardship in Limited Resources 
Areas 

God has graciously provided a collective 

abundance of resources on the planet, but they are 

just not distributed equally or fully appropriated.  

Just as material deprivation can lead to 

malnutrition, impaired immunity, crime, and 

disease; overabundance of resources can be 

harmful to body, mind, and spirit.  This unequal 

distribution may be the results of oppression, 

corrupt systems, climate change, personal sin, etc., 

but it also may be part of the sovereign plan of 

God to call his people to exercise the grace of 

giving (2 Cor 8:14-15) and to practice justice and 

mercy in the world as a sign of the kingdom (Mat 

11:5).  Would eradication of poverty undermine 

Jesus’ statement that we will always have the poor 

with us (John 12:8)?  Are not the two extremes 

worth opposing (Prov 30:8-9)?  Is not some degree 

of human deprivation beneficial: to feel the need 

for redemption, to seek interdependent relation-

ships, to practice patience, and to respond to good 

news with gratitude and long for a better hope?  

After healing the crowds, Jesus spoke of the 

blessings that reside with the poor and gave 

warnings to the rich that both may become a 

blessing to the nations (Luke 6:17-26).   

As Sustainer, God can mobilize unforeseen 

resources, but the injustice of an estimated 6% 



8  O’Neill 
 

May 2016. Christian Journal for Global Health, 3(1):3-10.          
 

fraud and embezzlement of global Christian 

resources must be faced.
23

  Participating in 

training healthcare professionals for retained 

service in LMICs helps meet the vast shortages 

and multiplies knowledge, as well as serving as an 

opportunity for mentoring.  Engaging in advocacy 

at the government level to create laws favorable to 

enhanced public health and justice is a calling to 

witness to the powers and cooperate with 

reforming systems for human flourishing.
24

 

Embracing the public health movement to utilize 

community health workers to provide greater 

access to care can be a way to distribute Christ-

followers into suffering communities.  As 

extensions to the reach of health knowledge, these 

empowered workers can move the locus of control 

from a minority of highly educated to the 

“strengthened hands of the poor” (Ezek 16:49), 

and through approaches such as Community 

Health Evangelism create greater witness to the 

truth of causes and cures of disease and the 

application of the gospel of peace.   

 

Conclusion 
Expanding Christian communities through-

out the world are indeed in a critical position to be 

faithful witnesses to the God who heals, to be salt 

and light to a health care industry that desperately 

needs to provide affordable, accessible, 

compassionate whole-person care to every 

population, and to influence policy and practice in 

global health toward equity and justice.  The very 

character and nature of God and the call to those 

who follow Him inform and inspire intelligent 

action, compassionate and comprehensive service, 

and effective results for human flourishing.  

Though often unrecognized and underappreciated, 

the Church needs to press on with increased 

confidence and vigor — standing in the gap to 

care and advocate for underserved populations, 

witnessing to corrupt systems for the greater good, 

extending God’s healing presence, and actively 

sending multipliers across cultures into all peoples 

until all things are made new.   

References 
1. Stern AM. Eugenic nation: faults and frontiers of 

better breeding in modern America, 2
nd

 Ed. Oakland: 

University of California Press. 2016. 1-27. 

 

2. Crisp N, Chen, L. Global supply of health 

professionals. New England Journal of Medicine 2014; 

370 (10): 950-956.  

http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1111610  

 

3. Joshua Project. Global Statistics [2015]. Available 

from: http://joshuaproject.net/global_statistics. 

 

4. Jenkins P. The next Christendom: the coming of 

global Christianity, 3
rd

 ed. New York: Oxford 

University Press. 2011. 276. 

 

5. Myers BL, Dufault-Hunter E, Voss IB, editors. 

Health, healing and shalom: frontiers and challenges for 

Christian health missions. Pasadena, CA: Wm Carey 

Library. 2015. 

 

6. Wright CJH. The mission of God: unlocking the 

Bible’s grand narrative. Downer’s Grove, IL: IVP 

Press. 2006:168-9;437.  

 

7. Swartley WH. Health, healing and the church’s 

mission: biblical perspectives and moral priorities. 

Downer’s Grove: IVP Academic. 2012. 25-42. 

 

8. Larson HE & O'Neill D.  Collective wisdom and 

practical knowledge: the new Christian Journal for 

Global Health. Christian Journal for Global Health, 

2014; 1(1) http://dx.doi.org/10.15566/cjgh.v1i1.26     

 

9. World Health Organization.  World Fact Sheet. Non-

communicable Diseases. [Cited 2015, January] 

Available from 

http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs355/en/  

 

10. World Health Organization, Commission on Social 

Determinants of Health. Closing the gap in a 

generation: health equity through action on the social 

determinants of health. Final Report of the Commission 

http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1111610
http://joshuaproject.net/global_statistics
http://dx.doi.org/10.15566/cjgh.v1i1.26
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs355/en/


9  O’Neill 
 

May 2016. Christian Journal for Global Health, 3(1):3-10.          
 

on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva: World 

Health Organization. 2008, 50-9. 

 

11. Kotter-Gruhn D, Wiest M, Zurek PP, Scheibe S. 

What is it we are longing for? Psychological and 

demographic factors influencing the contents of 

Sehnssucht (life longings). Journal of Research in 

Personality 43 (3), June 2009: 428-37. 

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.01.012 

 

12. Waitzkin H. The second sickness: contradictions of 

capitalist health care. (Lanham, MD: Rowman & 

Littlefield) 2000, 7. 

 

13. Bujo B. African theology in its social context. 

Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock. 1992: 122-9. 

 

14. Pfeiffer J, Johnson W, Fort M, Shakow A, 

Hagopian A, Gloyd S, et al. Strengthening health 

systems in poor countries: a code of conduct for 

nongovernmental organizations. American Journal of 

Public Health. Dec 2008; 98 (12), 2134-40.  

http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.125989  

 

15. Duff JF, Buckingham WW. Strengthening of 

partnerships between the public sector and faith-based 

groups. Lancet 2015; 386(10005). 

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60250-1     

 

16. Wright NT. Surprised by hope. New York: Harper 

One; 2008. p. 269. 

 

17. Chan S. Grassroots Asian theology: thinking the 

faith from the ground up. Downers Grove, IL: IVP; 

2014. p. 103. 

 

18. Escobar S. The new global mission: the Gospel 

from everywhere to everyone. Downers Grove, IL: 

IVP; 2003. p. 143-54. 

 

19. Litsios S. The Christian Medical Commission and 

the development of the World Health Organization’s 

primary health care approach.  American Journal of 

Public Health 2004, Nov 11; (11):1884-93.  

http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.94.11.1884 

 

20. United Nations.  Sustainable Development 

Knowledge Platform. Available from:  

https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transfo

rmingourworld  

 

21. United Nations. Goal three targets. Sustainable 

development. Available from: 

http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/health/ 

 

22. Disease control priorities, 3
rd

 Edition. (2015). 

Department of Global Health, University of 

Washington. World Bank Group Publications. 

Available from http://www.dcp-3.org/ 

 

23. Johnson T, Zurlo G, Hickman A. Embezzlement in 

the global Christian community. The Review of Faith 

and International Affairs 13(2). June 2015. 

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2015.1039302 

 

24. Davis R. What about justice? Toward an 

evangelical perspective on advocacy in development. 

Transformation, 26(2), 2009. 89-103.  

http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265378809103385

 

Peer Reviewed 

 

Competing Interests:  None declared.   
 
Disclosures: The contents of this article were presented by the author at the International Conference on 
Christian Response to Global Heath Issues at the Universitas Pelita Harapan on December 3, 2015 in 
Jakarta, Indonesia and published in the conference proceedings.    
 
Correspondence:  Daniel O’Neill, dwoneill@cjgh.org  
 

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.01.012
http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.125989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60250-1
http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.94.11.1884
https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld
https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld
http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/health/
http://www.dcp-3.org/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2015.1039302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265378809103385
mailto:dwoneill@cjgh.org


10  O’Neill 
 

May 2016. Christian Journal for Global Health, 3(1):3-10.          
 

Cite this article as: O’Neill DW.  Theological foundations for an effective Christian response to the global 
disease burden in resource-constrained regions.  Christian Journal for Global Health (May 2016), 3(1): 3-
10. 
 
© O’Neill DW This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons 
Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, 
provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit 
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ 

 

www.cjgh.org 

 

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/