SHORT COMMUNICATION              
 

July 2021. Christian Journal for Global Health 8(1)           
 

The church, food culture, and ecotheology: An ongoing church 
effort in reducing bushmeat eating in Minahasa, Indonesia 
 
Alva Supita,d, Agusteivie Telewb,d, Nancy Bawilingc,d 
 

a MD, MSc, PGDipClinRes, PhD student in Biomedical Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 
b MD, MSc  
c MD, MSc, Budi Setia Hospital Langowan, Minahasa, Indonesia 
d Public Health Department, Manado State University, Indonesia 
 
 

 
Abstract 
Minahasa is a Christian-majority region in the Muslim-majority country of Indonesia.  
Most of the Minahasan people are meat consumers, with an increased consumption 
rate during festive seasons.  Unfortunately, during these seasons, the consumption of 
non-cattle animals such as wild animals also increases.  This eating style was reported 
to be related to the high prevalence of metabolic diseases in this area.  In this paper, 
we report the effort of the largest church organization in Minahasa to promote healthy 
eating habits among its congregation, which comprises the majority of the society of 
the region.  More recently, the church has also been incorporating the values of wild 
animal conservation in its programs in collaboration with a local non-government 
organization.  This ongoing unique phenomenon might serve as a unique example of 
how a church organization can be involved in public and planetary health as a part of 
its mission to preach the gospel to every creature. 

 
Key Words: ecotheology, Minahasa, wild animals, eating habits, COVID-19 
 

Introduction 
Minahasa is a district region in the northern 

peninsula of Sulawesi Island, Indonesia.  Thanks to 
the efforts of the Netherlands Missionary Society 
(Nederlandsch Zendelinggenootschap) ministry—
among others—in the 19th century, Minahasa had 
become a Christian-majority area in the Muslim-
majority country of Indonesia. 

  Currently, there are on average 4.13 church 
buildings in every Minahasan village from various 
denominations (Table 1).  The largest denomination 
is the Minahasa Evangelical Christian Church 
(Gereja Masehi Injili di Minahasa, GMIM), 
possessing 998 out of 3,586 Protestant church 
buildings/sites in Minahasa.  

. 

 
 

 



65                                                                                                                                     Supit, Telew, Bawiling 
 

July 2021. Christian Journal for Global Health 8(1)            

 
 
 

Table 1. The descriptive statistics of churches in Minahasa compared to the Christian and total population and the number 
of villages 

Districts 
Population (all 

religions) 
Protestant 
population 

Catholic 
population 

Number of 
villages 

Protestant 
Churches 

Catholic 
Churches 

Minahasa, central 347,290 290,447 27,486 270 1,016 69 

South Minahasa 236,463 214,010 7,671 178 514 22 

North Minahasa 268,935 209,983 20,784 131 478 51 

Southeast Minahasa 116,323 95,527 1,424 144 306 14 

Manado City 451,916 306,262 27,211 87 717 28 

Bitung City 225,134 95,035 7,068 69 452 23 

Tomohon City 100,587 72,931 23,147 44 103 24 

Total 1,702,706 1,284,195 114,791 923 3,586 231 
Note: By Indonesian law, Protestant and Catholic are separated into two different religions.  
Data source: Ministry of Religious Affairs1, North Sulawesi Statistic Bureau2 

 
Food is a marker of social status in various 

civilizations around the world, including Minahasa.3  
While the Muslim-majority Indonesian people have 
a restricted meat diet, Minahasan people have been 
known to eat almost all animals, which can be 
partially attributed to their non-food-restricting 
belief in Christianity.  Local phrases circulating 
among Minahasans state that, “Even the devil, after 
cooked in chili, is our food,” as well as “If Adam and 
Eve were Minahasans, humans would never need to 
fall into sin because they would eat the snake instead 
of the forbidden fruit.”  These jests were not invented 
by Minahasans, as people from other areas have also 
claimed these jokes as their own.  However, 
Minahasan people are proud of being the subject of 
these, at least when chatting among themselves. 

It is not common for a Protestant church 
organization to intervene in what its congregation 
should or should not eat.4  However, in the last few 
decades, when the protections to endangered animals 
have been reinforced by the Indonesian law, the 
church has also been called upon to support the 
government efforts.  It has revived its ecotheological 
function, as stated by the Edenic charge to humans: 
to work the earth and take care of it—which also 
means to keep, maintain, and cultivate (Genesis 
2:15, various translations). The recently emerging 

COVID-19 pandemic has reinforced the function of 
the church in maintaining the relationship of its 
people with the wild animals; not eating them can 
prevent zoonotic transmission of animal pathogens 
into humans. 

In this paper, we report how local churches 
have been involved in advising healthy consumption 
of animal meat, especially during the festival seasons 
(e.g., Christmas and New Year).  This is embedded 
within the sermons at the discretion of the priest of 
the village-level congregations.  More recently, on 
the synodal level, formal memorandums of 
understanding were established, including an 
agreement with a local pro-environment, non-
government organization to protect wild animals, 
particularly the local ape (yaki, Macaca nigra) from 
being hunted for food.  Three factors form a related 
triangle of notions: the church, food culture, and 
conservation.  These will be the foci of discussion in 
this report. 

 
The excessive and exotic eating habit of 
Minahasan people during the festivals 

In Minahasa, Christmas is the most celebrated 
festival of the year, followed by the harvest 
thanksgiving period from June to August.  While the 



66                                                                                                                                     Supit, Telew, Bawiling 
 

July 2021. Christian Journal for Global Health 8(1)            

congregations celebrate Christmas day by attending 
the services in the church, the feast usually continues 
for the following week until the new year on the 1st 
of January.  During this period, special foods are 
prepared, mostly high in fat content.  The main 
domesticated animals to be slaughtered are pigs, 
chickens, ducks, followed by cows.  Unfortunately, 
it has been a tradition that the consumption of non-
cattle, wild animals also increased during the 
festival, including dogs, bats, snakes, turtles, and 
even some monkey species (ref. 1 and 2 in Mandias, 
20195).  The consumption of these exotic animals is 
rather cultural than nutritional, merely for 
celebration purposes. 

The church has been advising a reduction in 
this practice by incorporating health advice into the 
sermons around the Christmas season.  It is not 
uncommon for the priests to preach about healthy 
eating during the season, mostly quoting that, “our 
body is the temple of God, therefore we need to take 
care of the food intake to prevent diseases,” “Christ 
was born into humbleness, not feast,” as well as 
incorporating some satires about rational feastings, 
such as, “Don’t insist to eat brenebon (=red bean 
meat soup, a delicacy) in December, and pay the bon 
(=debt) for the whole following year.”  Approaches, 
however, were mostly—if not always—persuasive, 
not restrictive.  

It is noteworthy that Minahasa has the second-
highest prevalence of diabetes mellitus type 2 in 
Indonesia.6  The incidence of acute gout is also 
among the highest in Indonesia, which is likely to be 
related to the high-purine intake, including from wild 
and exotic animal meat.5  It is the authors’ 
observation as practicing physicians in this area that 
there is an increase of acute gout incidence in 
January compared to other months.  No randomized 
controlled study, however, has shown whether more 
aggressive contextual preaching during the festival 
season could reduce the incidence of acute gout or 
diabetes in the long term.  Also, there seems to be no 
direct scriptural prohibition against the habit of 
eating wild animals.  Therefore, other approaches to 

the congregation are necessary, most likely at the 
level of the church organizational policy. 

 
Green gospel, food culture, and 
pandemic 

In 2019, the synodal board of GMIM signed an 
agreement with Yayasan Selamatkan Yaki (YSY, 
Safe Ape Foundation) to incorporate the value of 
ecological conservation of wild animals into the 
curriculum of GMIM Sunday School.  The syllabus 
contained nine chapters about forest, fauna, marine, 
waste management, and others.7  While the 
Foundation has expertise in this conservation area, 
the Church leaders identified and shared the 
scriptures concerning the environment, e.g., Genesis 
2:15 and the story of Noah’s Ark.  This can be 
considered as the initial formal agreement of the 
church with an external organization, mutually 
reaching out for a common aim of wildlife 
conservation.  In fact, ecological themes have 
appeared in GMIM’s vision statements and themes, 
most notably in 2014: “ . . . to overcome poverty, 
injustice, radicalism, and environmental 
destruction.”  The 2019 pact with YSY can therefore 
be considered a manifestation of the vision 
statement. Encouragement from the pulpit was also 
given, asking the congregation, specifically, not to 
consume protected wild animals during the festivals.  
Nevertheless, due to the novelty of the program, it 
might be too early to observe the effect of the 
agreement.  The Covid-19 pandemic in the year 
following 2019 affected the implementation of the 
agenda.  On the other hand, the year 2020 has added 
another set of reasonings for advocating wildlife 
animal conservation. 

The SARS-Cov2 virus is believed to be 
originated from bats, mainly because it shares 
homology sequences with bat coronaviruses.8  
Although an exact incidence of zoonotic 
transmission has not yet been established, the 
imminent danger of the bat-to-human transmission 
of coronaviruses was predicted before it emerged.9  
Thus, humans need to keep away from the wild 



67                                                                                                                                     Supit, Telew, Bawiling 
 

July 2021. Christian Journal for Global Health 8(1)            

pathogen and, hence, to the carriers—in COVID-19 
context, the bats.  Many Minahasan people are proud 
bat-eaters.  The church, therefore, in addition to 
actively promoting healthy lifestyle behavior 
through the sermons, also acts as a provider of 
effective social control against wild animal 
consumption by reflecting on the ongoing pandemic 
and providing authoritative advice to avoid wild 
animal consumption.  

 
Conclusion 

As the largest Christian church organization in 
Minahasa, GMIM has been actively promoting 
healthy eating habits, and more recently, started to 
embrace a commitment against wild animal 
consumption.  However, the parameters for 
evaluating these commitments have not been well 
developed.  Therefore, as the process of fulfilling the 
calling for ecological preservation is ongoing, it is 
suggested that other collaborations, perhaps with the 
academia or public health agencies, can be made to 
systematically analyze the impact of Christian 
ecotheology application within GMIM on the health 
of the planet.  The green gospel should embrace the 
conservation of yaki, other wild animals, the 
environment, and the individual churches 
themselves as the body of Christ—the center of 
creation. 

 
References 
1. Ministry of Religious Affairs of North Sulawesi 

Indonesia. Data tempat ibadah di Sulut tahun 2019 
[Internet]. Manado, Indonesia; 2019. Available from: 
https://sulut.kemenag.go.id/data_umat/4/Data-
Tempat-Peribadatan-di-Sulut-Tahun-2019  

2. North Sulawesi Statistic Bureau. Provinsi Sulawesi 
Utara dalam angka 2021 [Internet]. Manado, 
Indonesia; 2020. Available from: 
https://sulut.bps.go.id/publication/2021/02/26/ef5603f
cc2c336b42cc0e4a5/provinsi-sulawesi-utara-dalam-
angka-2021.html  

3. Weichart G. Makan dan minum bersama: feasting 
commensality in Minahasa, Indonesia. Anthropol 
food. 2001 Mar 21;S3:S3-8. 
https://doi.org/10.4000/aof.2212  

4. Resane KT. “And they shall make you eat grass like 
oxen”(Daniel 4: 24): Reflections on recent practices in 
some new charismatic churches [Internet]. Pharos J 
Theol. 2017;98(1):1–17. Available from: 
https://www.pharosjot.com/uploads/7/1/6/3/7163688/
article_10__vol_98_2017.pdf  

5. Mandias R. The relationship between eating wild 
animal meat with the level of uric acid in Langowan 
Minahasa, Indonesia. KnE Life Sci. 2019;4(13):64–9. 
https://doi.org/10.18502/kls.v4i13.5226  

6. Utomo H, Wungow N, Marunduh S. Kadar Hba1c 
pada pasien diabetes melitus tipe 2 di Puskesmas 
Bahu kecamatan Malalayang kota Manado. e-
Biomedik. 2015;3(1). 
https://doi.org/10.35790/ebm.3.1.2015.6620  

7. Selamatkan Yaki. GMIM Church supports yaki 
conservation – Selamatkan Yaki [Internet]. 2019 
[cited 2021 Apr 2]. Available from: 
https://www.selamatkanyaki.ngo/2019/06/19/1417/  

8. Fang G, Song Q. Legislation advancement of one 
health in China in the context of the COVID-19 
pandemic: from the perspective of the wild animal 
conservation law. One Heal. 2021;12:100195. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2020.100195  

9. Fan Y, Zhao K, Shi Z-L, Zhou P. Bat coronaviruses in 
China. Viruses. 2019 Mar;11(3). 
https://doi.org/10.3390/v11030210  

     

 
 

Peer Reviewed: Submitted 1 April 2021, accepted 3 May 2021, published 30 July 2021 
 
Competing Interests: None declared.     
 
Correspondence: Alva Supit, Manado State University, Indonesia. alva.supit@unima.ac.id      

 

https://sulut.kemenag.go.id/data_umat/4/Data-Tempat-Peribadatan-di-Sulut-Tahun-2019
https://sulut.kemenag.go.id/data_umat/4/Data-Tempat-Peribadatan-di-Sulut-Tahun-2019
https://sulut.bps.go.id/publication/2021/02/26/ef5603fcc2c336b42cc0e4a5/provinsi-sulawesi-utara-dalam-angka-2021.html
https://sulut.bps.go.id/publication/2021/02/26/ef5603fcc2c336b42cc0e4a5/provinsi-sulawesi-utara-dalam-angka-2021.html
https://sulut.bps.go.id/publication/2021/02/26/ef5603fcc2c336b42cc0e4a5/provinsi-sulawesi-utara-dalam-angka-2021.html
https://doi.org/10.4000/aof.2212
https://www.pharosjot.com/uploads/7/1/6/3/7163688/article_10__vol_98_2017.pdf
https://www.pharosjot.com/uploads/7/1/6/3/7163688/article_10__vol_98_2017.pdf
https://doi.org/10.18502/kls.v4i13.5226
https://doi.org/10.35790/ebm.3.1.2015.6620
https://www.selamatkanyaki.ngo/2019/06/19/1417/
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2020.100195
https://doi.org/10.3390/v11030210
mailto:alva.supit@unima.ac.id


68                                                                                                                                     Supit, Telew, Bawiling 
 

July 2021. Christian Journal for Global Health 8(1)            

Cite this article as: Supit A, Telew A, Bawiling N. The church, food culture, and ecotheology: an ongoing 
church effort to reduce bushmeat eating in Minahasa, Indonesia. Christ J Global Health. July 2021; 
8(1):64-68.  https://doi.org/10.15566/cjgh.v8i1.537  

 
© Authors. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons 
Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any 
medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the 
license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 

cjgh.org 

https://doi.org/10.15566/cjgh.v8i1.537
about:blank

	Introduction
	References