id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
clinat-124	Ulshafer, Stephanie P.; Johnson, Samara D.; Schoell, Kevin N.; Winkelmann, Zachary K	Validity of Selective Tissue Tests for Knee Pathologies: An Evidence-to-Practice Review	2022	6	.pdf	application/pdf	3409	163	47	Due to the limited and low-quality research on the validity of knee physical tests on their own, it is best to combine a physical exam with a thorough history or use a combination of data known as clinical prediction rules. ISSN Online 2577-8188 Volume 5 – Issue 2 – September 2022 examination tests are supposed to give patients and clinicians a firm diagnosis, most of these tests have both low sensitivity and low specificity.4 The clinician should be familiar with the validity (degree to which a test measures what it is intended to measure) and shortcoming of each selective tissue test they perform, and the shortcomings of certain diagnostic tests.5 Because of the inconsistent results with many diagnostic physical evaluation tests, the purpose of the guiding systematic review was to evaluate the validity of individual and combinations of selective tissue tests for the knee.5 SUMMARY OF LITERATURE The guiding systematic review’s authors conducted a literature search using five databases: PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.	cache/clinat-124.pdf	txt/clinat-124.txt
