Clinical Psychology and the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed Methods Survey Among Members of the European Association of Clinical Psychology and Psychological Treatment (EACLIPT) Research Articles Clinical Psychology and the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed Methods Survey Among Members of the European Association of Clinical Psychology and Psychological Treatment (EACLIPT) Julia Asbrand 1 § , Samantha Gerdes 2 § , Josefien Breedvelt 3,4 , Jenny Guidi 5 , Colette Hirsch 6,7,8 , Andreas Maercker 9,10 , Céline Douilliez 11 , Gerhard Andersson 12,13 , Martin Debbané 14,15 , Roman Cieslak 16 , Winfried Rief 17 , Claudi Bockting 4,18 [1] Department of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany. [2] NHS Veterans’ Mental Health and Wellbeing Service, Camden and Islington NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom. [3] NatCen Social Research, London, United Kingdom. [4] Centre for Urban Mental Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. [5] Department of Psychology "Renzo Canestrari", University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. [6] Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, Denmark Hill, Camberwell, London, United Kingdom. [7] National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre, South London and Maudsley Hospital, London, United Kingdom. [8] South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, Camberwell, London, United Kingdom. [9] Department of Psychology, Division of Psychopathology and Clinical Intervention, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. [10] Wissenschaftskolleg Berlin–Institute of Advanced Study, Berlin, Germany. [11] Université catholique de Louvain, Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium. [12] Department of Behavioral Sciences and Learning, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. [13] Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Psychiatry, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. [14] Psychoanalysis Unit, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom. [15] Developmental Clinical Psychology Unit, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. [16] Department of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw, Poland. [17] Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany. [18] Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location AMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands. §These authors contributed equally to this work. Clinical Psychology in Europe, 2023, Vol. 5(1), Article e8109, https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.8109 Received: 2022-01-10 • Accepted: 2022-11-21 • Published (VoR): 2023-03-31 Handling Editor: Cornelia Weise, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, CC BY 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction, provided the original work is properly cited. https://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.32872/cpe.8109&domain=pdf&date_stamp=2023-03-31 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-6070 https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5352-2878 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1864-1861 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6815-2738 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3579-2418 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6925-3266 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8912-885X https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4753-6745 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4677-8753 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2413-5343 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7019-2250 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9220-9244 https://www.psychopen.eu/ https://cpe.psychopen.eu/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Corresponding Author: Josefien Breedvelt, Josefien Breedvelt, NatCen Social Research, London, UK, 35 Northampton Square, London EC1V 0AX, United Kingdom. E-mail: josefienbreedvelt@gmail.com Supplementary Materials: Materials [see Index of Supplementary Materials] Abstract Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected people globally both physically and psychologically. The increased demands for mental health interventions provided by clinical psychologists, psychotherapists and mental health care professionals, as well as the rapid change in work setting (e.g., from face-to-face to video therapy) has proven challenging. The current study investigates European clinical psychologists and psychotherapists’ views on the changes and impact on mental health care that occurred due to the COVID-19 pandemic. It further aims to explore individual and organizational processes that assist clinical psychologists’ and psychotherapists’ in their new working conditions, and understand their needs and priorities. Method: Members of the European Association of Clinical Psychology and Psychological Treatment (EACLIPT) were invited (N = 698) to participate in a survey with closed and open questions covering their experiences during the first wave of the pandemic from June to September 2020. Participants (n = 92) from 19 European countries, mostly employed in universities or hospitals, completed the online survey. Results: Results of qualitative and quantitative analyses showed that clinical psychologists and psychotherapists throughout the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic managed to continue to provide treatments for patients who were experiencing emotional distress. The challenges (e.g., maintaining a working relationship through video treatment) and opportunities (e.g., more flexible working hours) of working through this time were identified. Conclusions: Recommendations for mental health policies and professional organizations are identified, such as clear guidelines regarding data security and workshops on conducting video therapy. Keywords psychotherapy, video therapy, online therapy, blended therapy, clinical psychology, COVID-19 Highlights • Rapid change in psychotherapy delivery occurred due to the COVID-19 pandemic. • Clinical psychologists and psychotherapists report challenges (e.g., reluctance among patients) and opportunities, resulting from changes to the work environment. • Data security is crucial as well as access to treatment via video therapy. • National policy and organizational guidance is crucial to support clinical psychologists and psychotherapists in their work. Effects of COVID-19 on EACLIPT Members 2 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2023, Vol. 5(1), Article e8109 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.8109 https://www.psychopen.eu/ Health care services globally have faced unprecedented challenges due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Alongside the physical health consequences of the COVID-19 virus, mental health problems are also increasing, with reported increases for anxiety, depression, psychological distress and sleeping problems (Bohlken et al., 2020; Liu, Heinzel, Haucke, & Heinz, 2021; Rajkumar, 2020; Salari et al., 2020; Vindegaard & Benros, 2020; Xiong et al., 2020). Furthermore, there has been an estimated additional 53.2 million cases of major depressive disorder and an estimated additional 76.2 million cases of anxiety disorders globally (Santomauro et al., 2021). As a consequence, mental healthcare needs to be prioritized and clinical psychologists and psychotherapists1 play an important role in the prevention and treatment of these adverse consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, as yet little is known about how well clinicians and services have adapted to the increased demand and additional challenges presented by the COVID-19 pandemic, and what might be done to improve mental health care for those who have suffered psychologically as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical psychologists and psychotherapists had to find rapid alternatives to face-to- face treatment such as telephone-based or video therapy (Békés & Aafjes-van Doorn, 2020; Humer, Stippl, et al., 2020), or in-person sessions whilst adhering to their COV­ ID-19 national containment measures from the start of the pandemic. Prior studies have shown that the implementation of changes to service delivery can take an average of sixteen years to implement in a health care system (Rogers et al., 2017). In contrast, during the pandemic, change in service delivery was rapid and unexpected, and there was little supervision or guidance available for clinicians (e.g., Boldrini et al., 2020; Probst, Stippl, & Pieh, 2020). Moreover, the pandemic itself led to significantly higher stress levels in clinical psychologists and psychotherapists, especially in younger and less experienced professionals (Aafjes-van Doorn et al., 2020; Probst, Humer, Stippl, & Pieh, 2020). Additionally, fear of infection and other issues related to the pandemic itself were also reported by clinical psychologists and psychotherapists (Humer, Pieh, et al., 2020). In the midst of such rapid and unforeseen changes to practice, several reassuring and thought-provoking phenomena have been observed. For instance, preliminary evidence showed video therapy to be more effective than previously expected (Humer, Stippl, et al., 2020). Interestingly, the ability to adapt to conducting therapy via video is related to the individual clinical psychologists’ and psychotherapists’ attitudes and is influenced by their past experiences with video therapy (Békés & Aafjes-van Doorn, 2020). Further, challenges have been reported by mental health professionals regarding the lack of inter­ personal interactions, feelings of isolation and other technical issues whilst conducting therapy online (McBeath et al., 2020). The aforementioned studies provide an interest­ 1) We use the term “clinical psychologists and psychotherapists” throughout, however in order to accommodate for different definitions between countries, the term includes clinical psychologists as well as psychotherapists, scientist practitioners, and all other mental health professionals who provide psychological therapy. Asbrand, Gerdes, Breedvelt et al. 3 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2023, Vol. 5(1), Article e8109 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.8109 https://www.psychopen.eu/ ing, yet heterogeneous, picture of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health professionals. However, most of the studies used closed questions and quantitative methods (e.g., Békés & Aafjes-van Doorn, 2020; Boldrini et al., 2020), thus limiting the possibility for participants to provide their own insight into offering psychotherapy during a global pandemic. Professional organizations and other commissions have taken the initiative to provide the public and mental health care professionals with information regarding COVID-19 (e.g., UK2, Germany3, Austria4, Belgium5). However, it is also important for mental health care professionals who work ‘on the ground’ to share their experiences, in order for organizations to find ways to best support their clinicians. The current survey aimed to gather information ‘from the field’ to gain an understanding of the experiences of clinical psychologists and psychotherapists working during the COVID-19 pandemic, across different European countries. Members of the European Association of Clinical Psychology and Psychological Treatment (EACLIPT) were consulted; EACLIPT is an association that aims to foster research, education and dissemination of scientifically evaluated findings on clinical psychology and psychotherapy. The current study seeks to provide a first European wide insight into the perceived changes to clinical practice and research of clinical psychologists and psychotherapists, as well as the barriers and opportunities, in order to improve support to people as part of the response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The study also aims to gather information to highlight helpful ways for clinical psychologists and psychotherapists to approach, prioritize and manage their work in the context of the pandemic. Finally, it aims to provide information on how organizations and organizational bodies (such as EACLIPT) can best adapt to pandemic related changes. M e t h o d Participants The survey (see Appendix A, Supplementary Materials) was targeted at clinical psychol­ ogists and psychotherapists across Europe who are members of EACLIPT. Potential participants were recruited via the EACLIPT members database (n = 698) from 25th May 2020 to 1st September 2020, when COVID-19 restrictions were still in place in most countries. However, it should be noted that restrictions at this time were often not as strict as they were during the first wave of the pandemic, and there were also 2) https://www.bps.org.uk/coronavirus-resources/professional 3) https://psychologische-coronahilfe.de/ 4) https://www.boep.or.at/psychologische-behandlung/informationen-zum-coronavirus-covid-19 5) https://www.compsy.be/fr/coronavirus Effects of COVID-19 on EACLIPT Members 4 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2023, Vol. 5(1), Article e8109 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.8109 https://www.bps.org.uk/coronavirus-resources/professional https://psychologische-coronahilfe.de/ https://www.boep.or.at/psychologische-behandlung/informationen-zum-coronavirus-covid-19 https://www.compsy.be/fr/coronavirus https://www.psychopen.eu/ substantial differences between countries. Overall, n = 92 participants (13% of EACLIPT members) voluntarily agreed to participate in the survey. Most of the participants were from the United Kingdom (17.6%), Germany (16.5%), and Austria (13.2%; see Figure 1). Further, most participants worked in a university or other academic institute (34.4%), hospital (14%), public community clinic (15%) or private clinic (18%). The other 30.7% responses included: academic hospital (6.5%), university clinic (7.5%), retired (1%), Courts (1%), prison (1%), and not for profit (1%). Finally, most participants self-identified as working in an urban area (79.1%) compared to rural areas (15.4%), suburban areas (3.4%) and national coverage (1.1%). Figure 1 Country of Origin of Participants 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Bulgaria Czech Republic Slovenia Portugal Poland Norway Malta Spain Lithuania France Ireland Switzerland Italy Belgium The Netherlands Croatia Austria Germany United Kingdom Question: 'In which European country do you live?' Note. Please note that n = 6 participants chose to not comment on their country of origin. Procedure and Measures Socio-demographic information was collected using nine closed questions (e.g., country of origin, place of work and most commonly presenting patient need during the pandem­ ic). Five open questions were used to gain information on perceived changes in the work place, challenges and opportunities during the crisis, the effect of COVID-19 safety measures on their practice, and other implications. The survey was open for completion between 25th May 2020 and 1st September 2020. The last response that was included was submitted on 19th August 2020. Asbrand, Gerdes, Breedvelt et al. 5 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2023, Vol. 5(1), Article e8109 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.8109 https://www.psychopen.eu/ Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis The six phases of thematic analysis (Nowell, Norris, White, & Moules, 2017) were fol­ lowed by the first two authors (J.A. and S.G), including familiarization with the data (Phase 1), generating initial codes (Phase 2), searching for themes (Phase 3), reviewing themes (Phase 4), defining and naming themes (Phase 5) and producing the report (Phase 6). The third author (J.B.) supervised their work and checked the data during Phase 4, in order to review the themes that had been generated. This enabled research bias to be evaluated and the interpretation of the data to be confirmed. The first two authors screened the answers independently in Phases 1, 2, and 3 and formed their own categories, which were then compared and agreed on and a list of themes per question was finalized. Themes were then listed in terms of frequency for each question. The authors were each based in different countries, therefore all meetings took place over remote platforms. Regarding the overall process, reflexivity is considered as a key aspect of the thematic analysis process (Nowell et al., 2017). Therefore, the first two authors kept their own reflexive journal to document the logistics and methodological considerations as well as their own personal reflections. The precise analysis was then conducted in line of the six step technique by Braun and Clarke (2006). R e s u l t s The results have been analyzed according to the six-phase method by Braun and Clarke (2006) i.e., familiarization with the data, generation of initial codes, searching for themes, reviewing themes, defining and naming themes, and producing the report. Data are organized and summarized in the results section and the interpretation regarding signifi­ cance and implications follows in the discussion. Quantitative Results Changes in Patients Seeking Help Based on the question that asked if participants were seeing more or less patients, the number of patient contacts (i.e., number of patients seen by a clinician) seemed to remain relatively stable during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, as reported by 42% of the participants who indicated no change in the number of patient contacts. Nonetheless, almost 40% reported to see less patients, while 17% reported to see more patients. Further, 78.8% reported that patients displayed similar psychological problems as they did prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, 48.3% also reported that their patients seemed to be more distressed compared to one year before, whereas 28.7% reported no change in their patients’ distress. The most frequently reported patients’ clinical issues Effects of COVID-19 on EACLIPT Members 6 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2023, Vol. 5(1), Article e8109 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.8109 https://www.psychopen.eu/ encompassed anxiety (86%), depression (82%), loss of social contacts and isolation (each 39%) (see Figure 2). In terms of clinicians’ working practices, most responders reported that COVID-19 had changed their work routines (73.6%), mostly in ways that they perceived to be undesirable. Figure 2 Main Mental Health Issues Reported by Patients 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Anxiety Depression Loss of social contact Isolation Lonliness Covid-19 Economic Hardship Loss/bereavement Substance Abuse Seperation/divorce Psychosis Medical Interpersonal Difficulties ADHD Other Behaviour that challenges others OCD Behaviours Eating Disorders Suicidality Anger/aggression Neuropsychological Testing Trauma Sleep Problems Life Transitions Gender Transition Process Personality Disorder Question: 'Please select the main issues patients currently present with ' Note. Please note that not all patients were seen in standard psychotherapeutic environments which is why alternative topics are listed as the presenting problem. This refers to other medical conditions, neuropsychological testing and other non-identified topics. Qualitative Results The overarching themes that were identified in the data were: changes to clinical prac­ tice; changes to other work activities and contexts; the challenges and opportunities; the effect of COVID-19 measures on clinical practice and further reflections. Within these themes, the following categories were found including: Changes to working practices such as online working; psychotherapists reflections on the changes and an exploration of what could be improved and, implications for clinical practice and organizations. Perceived Changes in Clinical Practice Perceived changes in clinical practice were mostly in regards to working online, e.g., conducting video therapy, and working from home. Further, several participants reported changes in treatment frequencies (more/less patients, more sessions per patient), hygiene measures (such as wearing face masks, social distancing in assessments), challenges in Asbrand, Gerdes, Breedvelt et al. 7 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2023, Vol. 5(1), Article e8109 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.8109 https://www.psychopen.eu/ providing treatment while wearing personal protective equipment (such as face masks), redeployment and logistical difficulties if patients were not able to use online platforms. Citation regarding hygiene measures: “every patient has to wash first his hands, more disinfection, mouth-nose-protection, plexiglass for breath protection, safety distance, and more time and space are needed between the appointments for disinfection” Citation regarding personal protective equipment: “Wearing masks, me and patient, which is very disturbing while there is no emotional expression.” Some participants also reflected on patients’ concerns regarding treatment, such as more anxiety and individual differences in motivation to access online treatment. Further, therapists’ concerns were also mentioned (e.g., if their hygiene procedure is correct). Citation regarding therapists’ concerns: “the first thought in every step is 'how correct is my procedure?'” Overall, changes in patient contact (i.e., less appointments, fewer face-to-face contact, more support for patients) were named. Perceived Changes to Other Work Activities and Contexts Not all participants were necessarily working in clinical practice, and changes in research and teaching were also reported. Participants noted that procedures in the work environ­ ment were modified according to COVID-19 safety measures, often leading to a lack of contact between colleagues. In an additional question, general aspects of the working environment were covered. Here, once again digitalization was mentioned as a central change, as not only video therapy but also remote meetings with colleagues that had been introduced. Citation regarding digitalization: “No face to face clinics, therefore replying on phone and video contact. Working in isolation more and away from my team to do working from home.” Some participants reported that there was an increasing lack of contact between collea­ gues due to the increasing division in teams as a result of remote working. In answers to this question, participants also highlight the adherence to hygiene measures in the work environment such as social distancing, wearing masks and more cleaning. Several participants mentioned that they were mainly working from home and some were holding therapy sessions outside. Additionally, two participants were engaged in extra activities regarding COVID-19 (i.e., at a phone support line). Three participants said that there were significant changes to their research, such as delays in recruitment, or needing to stop research entirely. Effects of COVID-19 on EACLIPT Members 8 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2023, Vol. 5(1), Article e8109 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.8109 https://www.psychopen.eu/ Challenges and Opportunities in the COVID-19 Pandemic Era The challenges and opportunities that participants reported were wide ranging, and there was not always a clear distinction between what constituted a challenge or an opportunity (e.g., only replying “tele-therapy”), and sometimes different participants reported the same issue as a challenge, whereas others saw it as an opportunity. There were several participants who listed an opportunity that arose as a result of the COV­ ID-19 pandemic and also at the same time reported it as a challenge of working during the COVID-19 pandemic (e.g., no commute vs. constant working from home). Change in Work Logistics — The change to a predominantly technology-based work practice appeared to be either a challenge or an opportunity for participants. While several participants reported problems regarding technical knowledge and support or in­ ternet connection issues, as well as lack of equipment (such as laptops), remote working was also perceived by some as an opportunity to improve their own technology skills. Citation regarding technical factors: “videocalls are more tiring, but effective” A similar pattern of both challenges and opportunities emerged for working logistics: additional childcare, the need to develop new work-related rituals and a higher strain of videocalls were mentioned, as well as no time between meetings. However, several positive aspects were also mentioned, such as less need to travel, more flexibility at work, and the opportunity to access patients who may not have had the possibility to receive treatment otherwise. Some also felt that video therapy works very well, and some had been able to further develop their self-care strategies. Citation regarding working logistics: “The main challenge was man­ aging childcare alongside working while the nurseries were closed.” Citation regarding working logistics: “working from home so less MDT [multidisciplinary teams] working, not being able to provide a service for those with sensory impairments primarily hearing loss, increased competing demands on my time, my own response to COVID and lockdown and depleted resources over time. New ways of working do include being able to offer video or remote access to appointments not requiring people to travel and being able to support people who are shielding” Citation regarding working logistics: “I had to develop new rituals at the end of the work day, digital work exhausts me more than working from the office” Asbrand, Gerdes, Breedvelt et al. 9 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2023, Vol. 5(1), Article e8109 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.8109 https://www.psychopen.eu/ Clinical Issues — Interestingly, the therapy-related factors also included both challenges and opportunities. Interventions for some mental health problems appeared to be more challenging to deliver online (e.g., depression, trauma) compared to the pre-pandemic face-to-face settings (e.g., difficulty in finding new options to increase activity, more insecurity in trauma treatment due to a lack of stabilizing measures). Furthermore, par­ ticipants reported that they were at a greater physical distance to patients during face- to-face interactions, whereas online sessions provided less opportunity for non-verbal feedback and therapeutic engagement. Participants reported having to spend more time preparing for sessions, and there were concerns about a lack of consent and choice of therapy modality for patients. Conversely, less cancellations were noticed. Additionally, participants were able to receive contextual information about their patients by seeing their environment. Citation regarding therapy-related factors: “Less cancellations and non-attendance at sessions. Harder developing rapport and doing ther­ apy without the same transference or cues.” Citation regarding therapy-related factors: “video sessions allow for less non-verbal feedback/assessment (negative for diagnosis and treat­ ment recommendation); video sessions allow impression of the patient's home environment (important context information and opportunity for the patient to illustrate problems that occur at home = positive)” Citation regarding therapy-related factors: “Reachability was better for some, but worse for others, especially mothers (closed schools) and women in abusive relationships (often had to talk in their car)” Team and Organizational Factors — Several factors were portrayed as rather chal­ lenging, as participants reported difficulties regarding social factors at work, such as a worsening of team cohesion, staff absence, staff conflicts and social isolation. Although some found this to be a positive as they could decide who they spent time with. Citation regarding social factors: “All disciplines of staff not offered same opportunities to work from home causing conflict/envy; opportu­ nity to avoid toxic colleagues at work.” Citation regarding social factors: “prevent social isolation also in my staff without forcing collaborators back to work” Furthermore, a number of organizational factors were mentioned. For example, the rapid change of regulations (e.g., weekly changes) and the lack of guidelines and unified standards were reported to make working processes even more difficult. Effects of COVID-19 on EACLIPT Members 10 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2023, Vol. 5(1), Article e8109 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.8109 https://www.psychopen.eu/ Citation regarding organizational factors: “Trying to keep up with the constant information changes, rapid decision making and trying to look after myself too” Alongside organizational factors, data security issues were also mentioned. This often highlighted the problem of patient confidentiality and keeping data safely stored while working from home. Finally, participants reported difficulty adapting to new ways of working initially, however this appeared to develop into a new and practiced working routine over time. Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic Measures on Clinical Practice Participants mainly focused on the effects of COVID-19 emergency measures on their clinical practice. The general restrictions of contact, i.e., lockdown, social distancing, restricted entrance to buildings and building closures were mentioned by half of all par­ ticipants. These were often brought into close relation to other themes such as increased psychopathology in patients. Citation regarding general restrictions: “Restrictions concerning cer­ tain hours for meeting the patients.” Citation regarding general restrictions: “Lockdown and the unlocking of lock down introducing new anxieties and worry” Citation regarding general restrictions: “Full Lock-down, both in ef­ fect on my work directly and how it seeps into clients' existing strug­ gles” Another topic mentioned was the effect of wearing masks. Citation on wearing masks: “Mask....very hard to work without seeing emotional expression. Especially hard with kids” Citation on wearing masks: “Mask wearing - conceals the faces of both client and counselor, lack of nonverbal cues” Additionally, effects of hygiene measures on treatment were often mentioned, such as wearing protective clothing, opening windows during sessions, no face-to face contacts and short-notice cancellations due to patient concerns about showing COVID-19 symp­ toms. Citation regarding hygiene measures: “Wearing protection clothing - it is necessary and important but it makes work harder” Both general restrictions issued by the state and individual restrictions in the workplace had a significant effect on participants and their work, such as closure of nurseries, Asbrand, Gerdes, Breedvelt et al. 11 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2023, Vol. 5(1), Article e8109 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.8109 https://www.psychopen.eu/ quarantine, shielding, and loss of freedom as well as concerns around travelling on public transport. Citation regarding individual restrictions: “Closure of nurseries - hav­ ing to provide childcare between a working couple means a massive reduction in available working time.” Participants also reported on the effects on patients, such as changes in psychological symptoms and less motivation to seek help or engage in online sessions. Citation regarding effects on patients: “People with mental health conditions hold their breath: that is do not seek help because they are afraid to get COVID-19 and because there is a pause in social life” Citation regarding effects on patients: “COVID-19 measures, at least in Italy, did not help in containing the viruses, as people were terrified by the official information, so did not ask for help or did not dare to go to hospitals, and were hampered from going to parks.” Further Reflections Participants shared a variety of interesting insights into prospective changes concerning both mental health professionals and government policies. One major theme was the wish to collect, share and discuss their experiences of using video therapy. This included both concerns (e.g., regarding effectiveness and data security), and desire for specific training in psychotherapy delivered online. Participants also shared that they had a new understanding of the importance of being connected to their colleagues. Citation regarding sharing with colleagues: “More practice in online therapy, share data concern effectiveness of online therapy versus on said therapy” Citation regarding sharing with colleagues: “I think it would be a good idea to set up a section in Clinical Psychology in Europe [journal of the EACLIPT] and invite practicing clinical psychologists to describe their experience with new forms of work. I would be motivated by such an opportunity to contribute, and I would also learn from the experience of colleagues.” In terms of policy implications, it was argued that the importance of mental health should be further promoted at national levels, particularly given the collective impact on mental health. A greater flexibility (e.g., introducing video therapy into health insurance plans) and the possibility of choosing the most suitable treatment modality (e.g., face to face or video) were two major points raised by respondents. Furthermore, the effects Effects of COVID-19 on EACLIPT Members 12 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2023, Vol. 5(1), Article e8109 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.8109 https://www.psychopen.eu/ of the current pandemic on both research (e.g., regarding long-term effects on mental health), and the healthcare system was mentioned, including implications for research funding. Finally, government policy implications regarding the implementation of policy guidelines, such as closure of nurseries and schools, resulted in a dilemma for many parents who are having to work from home while caring for children. Citation regarding political implications: “Research funding being so FAST and associated huge number of reviews; being on funding panels. Existing research in NHS stopped due to redeployment.” Citation regarding political implications: “Acknowledgement of the impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of the population should be acknowledged at a national/international level. Awareness needs to be raised in governments and there needs to be a way to address the increased level of distress that the population will undoubtedly experience.” Citation regarding political implications: “Productivity whilst work­ ing from home is understood although not overtly acknowledged to be more limited when children to be cared for at home too which creates unnecessary guilt when torn between roles. Some managers (not mine) did not stand up to look after staff by leading and issuing clear guidance.” Several participants pointed out that there will be long-term consequences of the COV­ ID-19 pandemic on mental health. Citation regarding long-term consequences: “To be prepared that COVID-19 has a long-lasting effect on young people especially adoles­ cents and students” D i s c u s s i o n The current study demonstrates that the COVID-19 pandemic brought about unprece­ dented changes in clinical practice for clinical psychologists and psychotherapists across EACLIPT members in Europe. Changes to the clinical practice of psychologists and psychotherapists were sudden, for example the digitalization of therapy, which was at odds with previous attempts to implement digital mental health approaches in healthcare (Mohr, Riper, & Schueller, 2018). Some opinions and evidence have suggested that this has been a ‘black swan’ moment, where the COVID-19 pandemic has led to a rapid change in how mental health care is provided, including more opportunities for online working (Wind, Rijkeboer, Andersson, & Riper, 2020), also in low- and middle-income countries (Fu et al., 2020). Additionally, the current study showed that clinical psychol­ Asbrand, Gerdes, Breedvelt et al. 13 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2023, Vol. 5(1), Article e8109 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.8109 https://www.psychopen.eu/ ogists and psychotherapists managed to provide treatment throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, despite the additional challenges of working in this context, to patients who were perceived to be experiencing a greater level of distress. Although challenges were clearly identified in the current study, participants also identified opportunities from working through the pandemic, such as reduction in commuting time, increased work flexibility and accessibility for patients. Despite such a significant change in working context for clinical psychologists and psychotherapists, only one previous study looked at the impact of the pandemic on clinical psychologists and psychotherapists and also used a mixed-methods analysis of qualitative and quantitative data (McBeath et al., 2020). In that study, clinical psycholo­ gists and psychotherapists who were mostly based in the UK, were recruited via social media and, similar to our results, found that clinical psychologists and psychotherapists were able to cope with the rapidly changing work, and managed immediate problems with imagination and engagement. They also described a significant change of psycho­ therapeutic treatment, especially in relation to video therapy. Digitalization Even though clinical psychologists and psychotherapists have not yet reached a con­ sensus regarding whether they plan to continue using video therapy in the long run (Aafjes-van Doorn et al., 2020), the opportunities conferred via video therapy are clearly shown, both in the current study and other research (e.g., Humer, Stippl, et al., 2020). More than ten years ago, Simpson (2009) pointed out the opportunities and challenges of video therapy, naming the lack of research regarding efficacy as one major research goal. Simpson (2009) also pointed out that efficacy might be strongly related to patient and therapist’s personality and interpersonal style, as well as therapist skills and experience in the use of technology. A pilot project with university students (Simpson, Guerrini, & Rochford, 2015) and the analysis of the recent, COVID-19 induced changes (Simpson et al., 2021) clearly points out the potential of video therapy if used correctly. It seems likely that the pandemic has shaped therapists’ attitudes towards technology and led to a more positive view of it now they are more experienced in conducting treatment remotely, even if prior to COVID-19 they would not have elected to do so (Aafjes-van Doorn et al., 2020). As the success is highly dependent on therapists’ overall attitudes and self-con­ fidence regarding technology and remote therapy (e.g., Aafjes-van Doorn et al., 2020), training courses and supervision in this regard is essential. As Simpson (2009) already pointed out, some barriers that prevent access to psychotherapy and counselling might be tackled with video therapy such as geographical distance between major cities and remote and rural communities, and a lack of adequate or affordable transport between them. Furthermore, video therapy can be used by patients who are immobile (Connolly, Miller, Lindsay, & Bauer, 2020). It might also encourage patients to engage who are indecisive about treatment and worry about stigma. Finally, most studies overall tend Effects of COVID-19 on EACLIPT Members 14 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2023, Vol. 5(1), Article e8109 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.8109 https://www.psychopen.eu/ to conclude that video therapy will not be the new standard medium for psychotherapy (e.g., Aafjes-van Doorn et al., 2020; Connolly et al., 2020), but a useful addition under certain circumstances and considering specific adaptations such as providing a rationale for video therapy, maintaining therapeutic boundaries and finding a new way of risk management (for an overview see Simpson et al., 2021; for an exemplary analysis of pa­ tients with Borderline Personality Disorder see Ventura Wurman, Lee, Bateman, Fonagy, & Nolte, 2021). Conducting Therapy With Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) While the changes to working as a result of video therapy clearly brought opportunities, conducting therapy in person while using protective equipment such as face masks pre­ sented significant challenges. Clinical psychologists and psychotherapists who conducted face-to-face treatment during the pandemic mostly wore face masks and thus covered more than half of their face. Thus, while the disadvantage of video therapy is erased (e.g., no technological difficulties), others might appear: it has been argued both in our study and previous opinion pieces (e.g., Hüfner, Hofer, & Sperner-Unterweger, 2020) that emotions are harder to read if someone is wearing a face mask, which can then cause difficulties in the patient-therapist relationship. Interestingly, initial evidence from basic research has shown mixed findings. Some found that emotions are harder to read when the conversational partner wears a face mask (Grundmann, Epstude, & Scheibe, 2021), while others found in a longitudinal design that participants change which cues they use to detect an emotion, suggesting they adjust to the presence of masks (Barrick, Thornton, & Tamir, 2021). One study of school-aged children who are currently constantly interact­ ing while wearing masks concludes that masks pose a challenge but, in combination with other contextual cues, are unlikely to dramatically impair social interactions (Ruba & Pollak, 2020). Translating these findings to the clinical context, one can assume that psychotherapy with masks is somewhat more challenging than without masks, but could still lead to a good patient-therapist relationship and successful treatment outcomes. However, more research on the effects of masks on psychotherapy is necessary. Restriction of Contact It is important to acknowledge that clinical psychologists and psychotherapists have not only experienced a significant change in their working logistics, but also in their everyday life outside of work – similar to their patients and all other citizens. As some participants have highlighted, social support at work was less available and the team cohesion diminished, thus personal and work resources were limited. Furthermore, additional tasks added to stress (e.g., working from home without a proper place to work; child and other family care etc.). These factors indicate the importance of social support Asbrand, Gerdes, Breedvelt et al. 15 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2023, Vol. 5(1), Article e8109 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.8109 https://www.psychopen.eu/ among the clinical psychologists’ and psychotherapists’ community in difficult times, and the importance of leadership from professional and governmental organizations. Reflections for EACLIPT It has been an unprecedented working environment for clinical psychologists and psy­ chotherapists during the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical psychologists and psychothera­ pists were required to adapt their approach to work at very short notice during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, survey respondents reported that they managed to convert working logistics efficiently and have been providing much needed care for patients ever since, even though the examination of the efficacy of treatment still needs more research. This was often done on an individual basis or by smaller groups of colleagues. An important next step is to collect, share and discuss experiences of, and develop guidelines for, video or phone therapy or intervention. This has been done locally (e.g., UK, Simpson, Richardson, Pietrabissa, Castelnuovo, & Reid, 2021. However, the EACLIPT as an organization has provided a position statement and a summary of national statements on what is needed for both patients and clinical psychologists and psychotherapists as well as future research endeavors regarding mental health6 by integrating perspectives from a wide range of clinical psychologists and psychotherapists across multiple countries. Reflections for Government Policy and Other Institutions Although the sample of the current survey was limited to EACLIPT members, arguably, this data could be useful to inform the policies of government and other institutions, as the views of clinical psychologists and psychological therapists are represented from across a broad range of occupationals settings, across multiple European countries. The current findings emphasize the importance of including mental health issues in current policy considerations on how to manage the pandemic in the longer term. The long-term effects on mental health as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic are still not clear (e.g., de Figueiredo et al., 2021). Based on previous research on epidemics, further symptom increases in the upcoming one to three years are expected in anxiety, anger, depression, post-traumatic stress symptoms, alcohol abuse, and behavioural changes such as avoid­ ing crowded places and cautious hand washing (e.g., Kathirvel, 2020). This needs to be considered both in research (e.g., which factors could lead to mental health problems in the long run, de Figueiredo et al., 2021) and in health care (e.g., further flexible inclusion of video therapy into health insurance plans; enlarging mental health treatment provi­ sion; Kathirvel, 2020). In addition, the uptake of video therapy by clinical psychologists and psychotherapists during the COVID-19 pandemic offers the opportunity to take part 6) https://www.eaclipt.org/?tab=5 Effects of COVID-19 on EACLIPT Members 16 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2023, Vol. 5(1), Article e8109 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.8109 https://www.eaclipt.org/?tab=5 https://www.psychopen.eu/ in treatment long distance (the therapist in one country, the patient in another) which calls for cross-border guidelines. Limitations and Implications The current study was implemented during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, from May to September 2020. The pandemic is still ongoing and, thus, the situation is continually changing. To keep the questionnaire as short as possible to encourage participants to complete the survey, we did not include detailed information on the sociodemographic background and we did not ask for detailed numbers and facts, e.g. re­ garding the number of patient contacts before and during the pandemic. We rather opted to assess the personal estimation of change, which relies on the therapist’s perception of the number of patient contacts and could include inaccuracies. Additionally, we are aware that only a small number of members completed the survey (i.e., 13% of EACLIPT members) and, thus, the results have to be considered in light of a rather limited and selective sample. However, our results provide a qualitative and quantitative picture of the first abrupt changes to the work of clinical psychologists and psychotherapists as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, in the current study, responses to open questions were often quite short, which at times limited the scope of interpretation. However, many answers poin­ ted to similar conclusions as shown above. The current study highlights the tremendous challenges that both patients and clin­ ical psychologists and psychotherapists have experienced during the pandemic. Conse­ quently, there are calls for specific training for therapists and clear guidelines regarding the use of technology, data security and solutions to the psychotherapeutic challenges of delivering therapy remotely. However, more research (such as the follow-up to this survey that is underway) is necessary to identify the long-term effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on both patients and clinical psychologists and psychotherapists, and to com­ prehensively influence policy and future healthcare considerations. Asbrand, Gerdes, Breedvelt et al. 17 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2023, Vol. 5(1), Article e8109 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.8109 https://www.psychopen.eu/ Funding: The authors have no funding to report. Acknowledgments: The authors have no additional (i.e., non-financial) support to report. Competing Interests: Winfried Rief is one of the Editors-in-Chief and Colette Hirsch is a Subject Editor of Clinical Psychology in Europe. Both authors played no editorial role in this particular article or intervened in any form in the peer review process. Andreas Maercker, Céline Douilliez, Gerhard Andersson, Martin Debbané, Roman Cieslak, and Claudi Bockting are Editorial Board Members of Clinical Psychology in Europe but did not intervene in any form in the peer review process. Twitter Accounts: @julia_asbrand, @SamGerdes1, @JosefienUMH, @JennyGuidi, @DrColetteHirsch, @cdouilliez, @profGerhardA, @MartinDebb, @rocie, @WRief1, @clbockting S u p p l e m e n t a r y M a t e r i a l s The Supplementary Materials contain the questionnaire which was used in the study (for access see Index of Supplementary Materials below). Index of Supplementary Materials Asbrand, J., Gerdes, S., Breedvelt, J., Guidi, J., Hirsch, C., Maercker, A., Douilliez, C., Andersson, G., Debbané, M., Cieslak, R., Rief, W., & Bockting, C. (2023). Supplementary materials to "Clinical psychology and the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed methods survey among members of the European Association of Clinical Psychology and Psychological Treatment (EACLIPT)" [Questionnaire]. PsychOpen GOLD. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.12563 R e f e r e n c e s Aafjes-van Doorn, K., Békés, V., Prout, T. A., & Hoffman, L. (2020). Psychotherapists’ vicarious traumatization during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 12(S1), S148–S150. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000868 Barrick, E. M., Thornton, M. A., & Tamir, D. I. (2021). Mask exposure during COVID-19 changes emotional face processing. PLoS ONE, 16, Article e0258470. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258470 Békés, V., & Aafjes-van Doorn, K. (2020). Psychotherapists’ attitudes toward online therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 30(2), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/int0000214 Bohlken, J., Schömig, F., Lemke, M. R., Pumberger, M., & Riedel-Heller, S. G. (2020). COVID-19- Pandemie: Belastungen des medizinischen Personals: Ein kurzer aktueller Review [COVID-19 Effects of COVID-19 on EACLIPT Members 18 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2023, Vol. 5(1), Article e8109 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.8109 https://twitter.com/julia_asbrand https://twitter.com/samgerdes1 https://twitter.com/JosefienUMH https://twitter.com/JennyGuidi https://twitter.com/DrColetteHirsch https://twitter.com/cdouilliez https://twitter.com/profGerhardA https://twitter.com/martindebb https://twitter.com/rocie https://twitter.com/wrief1 https://twitter.com/clbockting https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.12563 https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000868 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258470 https://doi.org/10.1037/int0000214 https://www.psychopen.eu/ pandemic: Stress experience of healthcare workers – A short current review]. Psychiatrische Praxis, 47(4), 190–197. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1159-5551 Boldrini, T., Schiano Lomoriello, A., Del Corno, F., Lingiardi, V., & Salcuni, S. (2020). Psychotherapy during COVID-19: How the clinical practice of Italian psychotherapists changed during the pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(October), Article 591170. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591170 Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Connolly, S. L., Miller, C. J., Lindsay, J. A., & Bauer, M. S. (2020). A systematic review of providers’ attitudes toward telemental health via videoconferencing. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 27(2), Article e12311. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpsp.12311 de Figueiredo, C. S., Sandre, P. C., Portugal, L. C. L., Mázala-de-Oliveira, T., da Silva Chagas, L., Raony, Í., Ferreira, E. S., Giestal-de-Araujo, E., dos Santos, A. A., & Bomfim, P. O. S. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic impact on children and adolescents' mental health: Biological, environmental, and social factors. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 106, Article 110171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.110171 Fu, Z., Burger, H., Arjadi, R., & Bockting, C. L. (2020). Effectiveness of digital psychological interventions for mental health problems in low-income and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Psychiatry, 7(10), 851–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30256-X Grundmann, F., Epstude, K., & Scheibe, S. (2021). Face masks reduce emotion-recognition accuracy and perceived closeness. PLoS ONE, 16(4), Article e0249792. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249792 Hüfner, K., Hofer, A., & Sperner-Unterweger, B. (2020). On the difficulties of building therapeutic relationships when wearing face masks. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 138, Article 110226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110226 Humer, E., Pieh, C., Kuska, M., Barke, A., Doering, B. K., Gossmann, K., Trnka, R., Meier, Z., Kascakova, N., Tavel, P., & Probst, T. (2020). Provision of psychotherapy during the COVID-19 pandemic among Czech, German and Slovak psychotherapists. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(13), Article 4811. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134811 Humer, E., Stippl, P., Pieh, C., Pryss, R., & Probst, T. (2020). Experiences of psychotherapists with remote psychotherapy during the COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional web-based survey study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(11), Article e20246. https://doi.org/10.2196/20246 Kathirvel, N. (2020). Post COVID-19 pandemic mental health challenges. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 53, Article 102430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102430 Liu, S., Heinzel, S., Haucke, M. N., & Heinz, A. (2021). Increased psychological distress, loneliness, and unemployment in the spread of COVID-19 over 6 months in Germany. Medicina, 57(1), Article 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57010053 Asbrand, Gerdes, Breedvelt et al. 19 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2023, Vol. 5(1), Article e8109 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.8109 https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1159-5551 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591170 https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa https://doi.org/10.1111/cpsp.12311 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.110171 https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30256-X https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249792 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110226 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134811 https://doi.org/10.2196/20246 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102430 https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57010053 https://www.psychopen.eu/ McBeath, A. G., du Plock, S., & Bager-Charleson, S. (2020). The challenges and experiences of psychotherapists working remotely during the coronavirus pandemic. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 20(3), 394–405. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12326 Mohr, D. C., Riper, H., & Schueller, S. M. (2018). A solution-focused research approach to achieve an implementable revolution in digital mental health. JAMA Psychiatry, 75(2), 113–114. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.3838 Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), Article 1609406917733847. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847 Probst, T., Humer, E., Stippl, P., & Pieh, C. (2020). Being a psychotherapist in times of the novel coronavirus disease: Stress-level, job anxiety, and fear of coronavirus disease infection in more than 1,500 psychotherapists in Austria. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 559100. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.559100 Probst, T., Stippl, P., & Pieh, C. (2020). Changes in provision of psychotherapy in the early weeks of the COVID-19 lockdown in Austria. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11), Article 3815. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113815 Rajkumar, R. P. (2020). COVID-19 and mental health: A review of the existing literature. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 52, Article 102066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102066 Rogers, H., Madathil, K. C., Agnisarman, S., Narasimha, S., Ashok, A., Nair, A., Welch, B. M., & McElligott, J. T. (2017). A systematic review of the implementation challenges of telemedicine systems in ambulances. Telemedicine and e-Health, 23(9), 707–717. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2016.0248 Ruba, A. L., & Pollak, S. D. (2020). Children’s emotion inferences from masked faces: Implications for social interactions during COVID-19. PloS ONE, 15(12), Article e0243708. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243708 Salari, N., Hosseinian-Far, A., Jalali, R., Vaisi-Raygani, A., Rasoulpoor, S., Mohammadi, M., Rasoulpoor, S., & Khaledi-Paveh, B. (2020). Prevalence of stress, anxiety, depression among the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Globalization and Health, 16(1), Article 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-00589-w Santomauro, D. F., Herrera, A. M. M., Shadid, J., Zheng, P., Ashbaugh, C., Pigott, D. M., Abbafati, C., Adolph, C., Amlag, J. O., Aravkin, A. Y., Bang-Jensen, B. L., Bertolacci, G. J., Bloom, S. S., Castellano, R., Castro, E., Chakrabarti, S., Chattopadhyay, J., Cogen, R. M., Collins, J. K., Dai, X., … Ferrari, A. J. (2021). Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet, 398(10312), 1700– 1712. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02143-7 Simpson, S. (2009). Psychotherapy via videoconferencing: A review. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 37(3), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069880902957007 Simpson, S., Guerrini, L., & Rochford, S. (2015). Telepsychology in a university psychology clinic setting: A pilot project. Australian Psychologist, 50(4), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.12131 Effects of COVID-19 on EACLIPT Members 20 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2023, Vol. 5(1), Article e8109 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.8109 https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12326 https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.3838 https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.559100 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113815 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102066 https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2016.0248 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243708 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-00589-w https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02143-7 https://doi.org/10.1080/03069880902957007 https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.12131 https://www.psychopen.eu/ Simpson, S., Richardson, L., Pietrabissa, G., Castelnuovo, G., & Reid, C. (2021). Videotherapy and therapeutic alliance in the age of COVID‐19. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 28, 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2521 Ventura Wurman, T., Lee, T., Bateman, A., Fonagy, P., & Nolte, T. (2021). Clinical management of common presentations of patients diagnosed with BPD during the COVID-19 pandemic: The contribution of the MBT framework. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 34((3-4), 744–770. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2020.1814694 Vindegaard, N., & Benros, M. E. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic and mental health consequences: Systematic review of the current evidence. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 89, 531–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.048 Wind, T. R., Rijkeboer, M., Andersson, G., & Riper, H. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic: The ‘black swan’ for mental health care and a turning point for e-health. Internet Interventions, 20, Article 100317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2020.100317 Xiong, J., Lipsitz, O., Nasri, F., Lui, L. M. W., Gill, H., & Phan, L. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: A systematic review. Journal of Affective Disorders, 277, 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.001 Clinical Psychology in Europe (CPE) is the official journal of the European Association of Clinical Psychology and Psychological Treatment (EACLIPT). PsychOpen GOLD is a publishing service by Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID), Germany. Asbrand, Gerdes, Breedvelt et al. 21 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2023, Vol. 5(1), Article e8109 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.8109 https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2521 https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2020.1814694 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.048 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2020.100317 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.001 https://www.psychopen.eu/ Effects of COVID-19 on EACLIPT Members (Introduction) Method Participants Procedure and Measures Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis Results Quantitative Results Qualitative Results Discussion Digitalization Conducting Therapy With Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Restriction of Contact Reflections for EACLIPT Reflections for Government Policy and Other Institutions Limitations and Implications (Additional Information) Funding Acknowledgments Competing Interests Twitter Accounts Supplementary Materials References