The Effect of Depression and Hopelessness on Suicidal Risk in Young People: The Mediating Role of Impulsivity Research Articles The Effect of Depression and Hopelessness on Suicidal Risk in Young People: The Mediating Role of Impulsivity Anyerson Stiths Gómez-Tabares 1 , Olber Eduardo Arango-Tobón 1 , César Núñez 2,3 , Gastón Adolfo Zapata Lesmes 4 [1] Faculty of Social Sciences, Health and Wellness, Universidad Católica Luis Amigó, Medellín, Colombia. [2] Psychology Program, Faculty of Social and Human Sciences, Universidad de Medellín, Medellín, Colombia. [3] Corporación APICSA, Medellín, Colombia. [4] Faculty of Social Sciences, Health and Wellness, Universidad Católica Luis Amigó, Manizales, Colombia. Clinical Psychology in Europe, 2025, Vol. 7(2), Article e11331, https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.11331 Received: 2023-02-07 • Accepted: 2024-11-02 • Published (VoR): 2025-05-28 Handling Editor: Winfried Rief, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany Corresponding Author: Anyerson Stiths Gómez-Tabares, Faculty of Social Sciences, Health and Wellness, Psychology Program, Universidad Católica Luis Amigó, Tv. 51a #67B 90, Colombia, Medellín, Antioquia. Postal Code 050034. Phone: +57 (604) 4487666. E-mail: anyerspn.gomezta@amigo.edu.co Supplementary Materials: Materials [see Index of Supplementary Materials] Abstract Background: Previous studies have documented that depression and hopelessness predict higher suicide risk in young people. However, the psychological mechanisms that may mediate these associations are unknown. The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of depression, hopelessness, and impulsivity on suicidal attempts and risk, and to explore the mediating role of impulsivity in these associations. Method: A total of 1,645 young people participated with a mean age of 21.604 years (SD = 3.22) (68.8% female and 31.2% male). A sociodemographic form was applied to explore suicide attempts in the last year (SA), the Plutchik Suicide Risk (SR), Beck Hopelessness (BHS), Barratt Impulsivity (BIS), and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scales. Direct correlations were found among BHS, BDI, BIS, SA, and SR. Results: The binary regression model showed that the variables BHS, BDI, and BIS explained between 33% and 49% of the variance of suicidal risk and 16% of the variance of suicide attempts. Structural equation analysis showed that impulsivity mediated the associations between depression, hopelessness, and suicidal risk, on the one hand, and mediated the associations between depression and suicide attempt, on the other hand, whose total direct and indirect effects were statistically significant. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, CC BY 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction, provided the original work is properly cited. https://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.32872/cpe.11331&domain=pdf&date_stamp=2025-05-28 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7389-3178 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9831-5734 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8925-993X https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8869-7644 https://www.psychopen.eu/ https://cpe.psychopen.eu/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Conclusion: The findings emphasize the importance of impulsivity as the mechanism influencing interactions between mood indicators and suicidal behavior in young populations. Keywords suicide, impulsivity, depression, emotions, risk Highlights • Depression and hopelessness have been identified as significant predictors of suicidal behavior in young people. • The effect of depression and hopelessness on suicidal behavior is mediated by impulsivity. • The effect of depression, hopelessness, and impulsivity on suicidal behavior showed invariance by sex (male/female). According to the Global Health Estimates Report (WHO, 2021), suicide is the fourth lead­ ing cause of death worldwide in young people aged 15-19 years. Previous attempts have been reported to be the most important risk factor for suicide in the general population. According to the Institute of Legal and Forensic Medicine in Colombia 2,952 suicides were registered, and the annual rate corresponds to 6,16 cases per 100,000 inhabitants in 2022 (National Institute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences, 2023). Several current systematic reviews have identified a broad set of risk factors associ­ ated with suicide, including social isolation, mental disorders, alcohol abuse, family-rela­ ted events, information processing styles, and deficits in neuropsychological functions (Ati et al., 2021; González Sancho & Picado Cortés, 2020; Hernández-Bello et al., 2020). Nevertheless, the role of personality factors, such as impulsivity, remains under investi­ gation. The current evidence is inconsistent regarding the mediating role of impulsivity among depression, hopelessness, suicide attempts, and suicidal behavior. Research on cognitive processing has found that hopelessness plays an important role in suicidal risk and behavior and has a mediating role between depressive symptoms and suicide attempts in adults and youth (Choi & Shin, 2023; Dat et al., 2021). Horwitz et al. (2017) found that hopelessness is a longitudinal predictor of depression in youth at high suicidal risk. Their study suggests that lack of positive expectations is the most significant predictor of depression and future suicidal behavior, as hopelessness magnifies depressive symptoms, which in turn increases the likelihood of suicide, espe­ cially when combined with loss of social connectedness and loneliness. Indeed, negative circumstances related to stressors in various roles, such as family conflicts, lack of support networks, or social pressure, can influence the development of suicidal ideation (Dutton et al., 2013; Puzia et al., 2014). These factors align with Joiner's (2005) theory, which posits that the perception of being a burden to others (e.g., family, The Mediating Role of Impulsivity in Suicidal Risk 2 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2025, Vol. 7(2), Article e11331 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.11331 https://www.psychopen.eu/ friends, or society) is associated with both an increased risk of suicide and the acquired capability for suicide. In this context, path analyses proposed by Dat et al. (2021) in a sample of 322 young college students demonstrated that hopelessness functions as a mediator of the effect of self-esteem and social anxiety, intensifying depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation. Additional studies have indicated that hopelessness is a predictor of depression (Choi & Shin, 2023), and both psychological factors would strongly predict suicidal risk in young populations (Gómez-Tabares et al., 2024; Núñez et al., 2023). Some studies have approached risk factors from a direct effect and mediation ap­ proach to suicidal behavior, noting the importance of recognizing the interaction of these elements in the mechanism that predicts suicide. Similarly, Wang et al. (2015) found that hopelessness, depression, and impulsivity contribute significantly to the development of suicidal risk and behavior, but such contribution depends on how these factors inter­ act with each other. In their study, they concluded that hopelessness mediated by the severity of depression has an indirect effect on suicidal ideation because hopelessness is not a direct cause of suicidal behavior and only gains strength when mediated by depressive symptomatology. This mechanism of direct and indirect effects is dependent on high or moderate levels of impulsivity in patients with depression since these patients with greater impulsivity are more likely to increase suicide attempts and display suicidal behavior in general. Therefore, an important construct in the interaction of suicide risk factors is impul­ sivity. Current evidence suggests that impulsivity is a significant component of suicidal behavior and plays an important role in the transition from suicidal ideation to suicide attempt (Beach et al., 2022; Cole et al., 2019). Zhang et al. (2022), in a community sample of 480 college students, examined the effect of impulsivity on suicidal ideation by depression. The results indicated that impulsivity had an indirect but mediating effect on depression and concluded that the higher the students' impulsivity, the stronger the predictive effect of depression on suicidal ideation. Other studies indicate that people with higher impulsivity scores report significantly more suicide attempts than patients with lower impulsivity scores (Mann et al., 1999). However, in a meta-analysis conducted by Anestis et al. (2014), the central role of impul­ sivity in suicide attempts and risk is questioned, noting that impulsivity is a distal risk factor that modulates the effect of more direct factors such as precipitating experiences that increase suicide in individuals. Literature has indicated that depression and hopelessness may interact with impulsiv­ ity to generate an increased risk for suicidal attempts and behaviors (Arango-Tobón et al., 2021; Dumais et al., 2005; Swann et al., 2008). Arango-Tobón et al. (2021) points out that impulsivity is a mediator between depression and suicidal behavior and acts as a trigger and determinant of suicide in young people. Gómez-Tabares, Arango-Tobón, Núñez, & Zapata Lesmes 3 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2025, Vol. 7(2), Article e11331 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.11331 https://www.psychopen.eu/ Given the above, further evidence on the mediating role of impulsivity between depression and hopelessness may generate better assessment processes for the identifica­ tion of suicidal behaviors and better ways to intervene early in short-term suicide risk indicators during youth. The present study aimed to explore whether impulsivity plays a mediating role between depression and hopelessness concerning suicide attempts and risk. We hypothesized that 1) Both depression and hopelessness have significant direct effects on suicide attempts and risk, but 2) Impulsivity as a mediator between depression and hopelessness amplifies their direct or indirect effects on suicide attempts and risk in young people. Method Participants A stratified random probability sampling by academic semesters from three private universities in Manizales and Medellín (Colombia) was used. A total of 2,580 students were invited to participate voluntarily in this study. A total 935 people did not participate in the study for the following reasons: minors (<18 years of age) who did not provide informed parental consent (n = 92), were absent on the day of data collection, or did not want to participate in the study (n = 175), did not complete all the questionnaires admin­ istered or left more than five items in a row unanswered in one or more instruments (n = 668). The main inclusion criterion is that they were young people between the ages of 18 and 30 since the highest suicide rates in Colombia occur among young people aged 18 and 19 (10.43 per 100,000 inhabitants), 20 to 24 (9.98 per 100,000 inhabitants) and 25 to 29 (8.16 per 100,000 inhabitants) (Instituto Nacional de Salud, 2023). In addition, the highest incidence of suicide attempts also occurs in the young population and has increased systematically in the last five years in the cities of Manizales and Medellin, Co­ lombia. Furthermore, the highest incidence of suicide attempts is observed in the young population, with a notable increase over the past five years in the cities of Manizales and Medellín, Colombia. The final sample consisted of 1,645 young people attending three private universities in two Colombian cities, Manizales (n = 992, 60.3%), and Medellín (n = 653, 39.7%). In terms of sex, 1,131 were women (68.8%) and 514 were men (31.2%). The mean age was 21.604 years (SD = 3.22). Regarding the socioeconomic level, 24.4% belonged to the lower level, 65.5% to the middle level, and 10.2% to the upper level. 62.2% reported not having a partner, 30.9% reported having a partner relationship, 3.5% lived with their partner, 2.1% were married and 0.9% reported no information. Participants from both cities were from urban areas and did not differ in terms of socioeconomic status (z = -0.894, p = .371). The Mediating Role of Impulsivity in Suicidal Risk 4 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2025, Vol. 7(2), Article e11331 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.11331 https://www.psychopen.eu/ There were no indigenous or rural populations. The results section describes the mental health indicators of the youth reported from the instruments. Instruments Ad Hoc Sociodemographic Form This self-administered form collected data on participants' age, sex, place of residence, socioeconomic status, history of suicide attempts, and number of such attempts. The variable corresponding to suicide attempts was obtained from self-reports of at least one attempt in the past year, assessed using a dichotomous response format (yes/no). Responses were coded numerically, assigning a value of 0 to a no response and 1 to a yes response. Plutchik Suicide Risk Scale (SR) It is a Likert-type instrument designed to assess the risk of suicide attempts (Plutchik & Van Praag, 1989). It includes 15 items, each with dichotomous response options (Yes/ No). Affirmative responses are scored with one point, resulting in a maximum score of 15. A score above 6 suggests the presence of suicidal risk (Rubio et al., 1998). The scale is frequently used in research with young population in Colombia (Gómez-Tabares, 2020; Gómez-Tabares et al., 2024; Núñez et al., 2023; Suárez-Colorado et al., 2019), dem­ onstrating internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha values above 0.75. For this study, internal consistency between 0.77 (Cronbach's alpha) and 0.82 (McDonald's Omega) was evidenced. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed that the scale was a good fit for a unidimensional model of suicide risk (GFI = 0.972, AGFI = 0.960, RMSEA = 0.043). Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) It is a screening instrument to detect feelings of hopelessness associated with depression and suicide risk. It was developed by Beck et al. (1974) and consists of 20 dichotomous (true/false) items reflecting cognitive and emotional components of hopelessness. Scores range from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater severity of hopelessness. The scale allows the severity of hopelessness to be classified as minimal (0 to 3), mild (4 to 8), moderate (9 to 14), and severe (15 to 20). Validation studies conducted with the Colombian population report a Cronbach's alpha between 0.82 and 0.93, test-retest reliability coefficients between 0.60 and 0.69 (Rueda-Jaimes et al., 2018), and optimal fit for a unidimensional structure (CFI = 0.99, RMSEA = 0.03) (Pineda-Roa et al., 2024). The internal consistency for this study was .84 (Cronbach's alpha) and .88 (McDonald's Omega). Confirmatory factor analysis was also conducted and indicated that the data were consistent with a unidimensional model (GFI = 0.973, AGFI = 0.964, RMSEA = 0.033). Gómez-Tabares, Arango-Tobón, Núñez, & Zapata Lesmes 5 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2025, Vol. 7(2), Article e11331 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.11331 https://www.psychopen.eu/ Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) It is a 21-item self-report measure designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms (Beck et al., 1979). It assesses affective, cognitive, physiological, and behavioral aspects of depression. Each item is scored on a scale of 0 to 3, with a total score ranging from 0 to 63. Higher scores indicate greater severity. The inventory allows the classification of de­ pressive symptoms into minimal (0 to 9), mild (10 to 16), moderate (17 to 29), and severe (30 to 63). Studies conducted with university students in Colombia have shown internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha values between 0.88 and 0.92 (Arango-Tobón et al., 2021; Núñez et al., 2023). In this study, internal consistency was 0.89 (Cronbach's alpha) and 0.91 (McDonald's Omega). Confirmatory factor analysis supported a unidimensional structure with good fit indices (GFI = 0.967, AGFI = 0.959, RMSEA = 0.035). Barratt Impulsivity Scale, v. 11 (BIS-11) This is a self-report Likert-type scale designed to assess impulsivity as a behavioral trait (Patton et al., 1995). The linguistic equivalence of the BIS-11 has been demonstrated for use in Spanish-speaking population (Oquendo et al., 2001). The scale consists of 30 items on a 4-point scale (rarely or never, occasionally, often, and always or almost always). Studies conducted with Colombian adolescent and adult populations have demonstrated acceptable internal consistency for the total scale score, reporting Cronbach's alpha values between 0.75 (Urrego Barbosa et al., 2017) and 0.795 (Chachín Pinzón et al., 2019). Additionally, Stanford et al. (2009) highlighted the use of a score of 74 in psychological studies to identify impulsivity. The internal consistency for this study was 0.75 (Cron­ bach's alpha) and 0.79 (McDonald's omega). Confirmatory factor analysis supported a unidimensional structure with acceptable goodness-of-fit indices (GFI = 0.943, AGFI = 0.931, RMSEA = 0.040). Procedure and Ethical Aspects The recruitment of participants did not involve any specific clinical criterion and was carried out through the modality of subjects available in the classrooms, according to the stratification by academic semester of three university institutions in the cities of Manizales and Medellin, Colombia. After the application of the informed consent form and on a voluntary basis, the young people filled out the instruments manually with pencil and paper. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Universidad Católica Luis Amigó and the Corporación Coetika, Manizales, Colombia. It was research without risk for the participants (Resolution 8430 of 1993) and was ethically oriented in Law 1090 of the Colombian College of Psychologists regarding the exercise of research. Law 1266 of 2008; Law 1581 of 2012 and Decree 1377 of 2013 regarding the handling of personal data were taken into account when considering the criteria for the collection, handling, and special protection of personal data and the use of information for academic research The Mediating Role of Impulsivity in Suicidal Risk 6 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2025, Vol. 7(2), Article e11331 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.11331 https://www.psychopen.eu/ purposes. Although the sampling did not include specific clinical criteria, young people who showed an indicator of suicidal risk according to the Plutchik scale were referred to the University Welfare Service for counseling and psychological support. Data Analysis Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 25.0. First, a descriptive analysis of the socio-demographic characteristics of the sample was carried out. The internal consisten­ cy of the instruments was confirmed using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega coefficients. The instruments were also tested for fit to a unidimensional structure from confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) (Byrne, 2016). Descriptive and frequency statistics were calculated for the suicide risk, suicide attempt, depression, hopelessness and impul­ sivity variables. Kolmogorov-Smirnov and chi-squared (χ2) tests were used to assess the distribution of the data, which showed that they were not normally distributed. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare scores for suicide risk and attempt, depression, hopelessness and impulsivity by sex on the one hand, and suicide risk factor on the other. The p-value was reported and effect sizes were calculated for these compar­ isons. The eta-squared (η2) was used as a measure of effect size (small (0.01), medium (0.06) and large (0.14) (Fritz et al., 2012). Spearman's rho was used to assess correlations between the variables of depression, hopelessness and impulsivity and suicide risk and attempt. Two path analysis models were then developed to estimate the standardized direct and indirect effects between the variables. These models were analyzed using generalized least squares. Bootstrapping with a 95% confidence interval was used to estimate total, direct, and standardized indirect effects (Byrne, 2016). Model fit was assessed by probability χ2 (p ≥ .05), χ2/df (values < 3), and additional fit indices including comparative fit index (CFI ≥ 0.90), incremental fit index (IFI ≥ 0.90), Tucker-Lewis index (TLI ≥ 0. 90), goodness of fit index (GFI ≥ 0.90), adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI ≥ 0.90), normed fit index (NFI ≥ 0.90), and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA ≤ 0.08) (Byrne, 2016; Schermelleh-Engel et al., 2003). Finally, a multigroup analysis was performed to test the invariance of the structural model between sexes (male/female). The ΔCFI criterion was used to assess model equivalence, with a change equal to or less than 0.01 (ΔCFI ≤ 0.01) supporting invariance (Cheung & Rensvold, 2002). Path and multigroup analyses were performed in Amos v. 24.0 software. Results Regarding the most relevant mental health indicators reported, a suicide risk factor was found in 26.7% of the young people and a history of a previous suicide attempt in 13.2%. It was also found that 36% of the young people reported some symptoms of depression Gómez-Tabares, Arango-Tobón, Núñez, & Zapata Lesmes 7 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2025, Vol. 7(2), Article e11331 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.11331 https://www.psychopen.eu/ and 27.2% reported indicators of hopelessness (Supplementary Materials, Table 1). We found that women had higher scores than men in suicidal risk and depression. When assessing the effect size of significant sex differences, a small effect size was identified. No differences were found between men and women in suicide attempts, hopelessness, and impulsivity (Supplementary Materials, Table 2). A comparative analysis of psychological variables as a function of suicide risk and attempt was performed (see Table 1). The young people who presented a suicide risk factor showed higher scores in depression, hopelessness, and impulsivity compared to the group without risk. Additionally, youth who reported any suicide attempt in the last year presented higher scores in suicidal risk, depression, hopelessness, and impulsivity compared to the group with no history of attempts. All differences were statistically significant (p < .001). Table 1 Differences According to Suicide Risk and Attempt and the Variables of Depression, Hopelessness, and Impulsivity Variable M SD AR Mdn M SD AR Mdn z p η2 Without risk With risk Test statistic Suicide attempt 1.02 0.15 734.29 1.00 1.43 0.50 1065.93 1.00 -21.385 < .001 0.278 Depression 6.11 5.42 666.59 5.00 17.38 9.59 1251.35 17.00 -22.136 < .001 0.298 Hopelessness 2.03 2.11 705.20 2.00 5.49 4.48 1145.60 4.00 -16.872 < .001 0.173 Impulsivity 47.48 12.37 715.19 46.00 59.41 13.55 1118.25 60.00 -15.237 < .001 0.141 Without suicide attempt With suicide attempt Test statistic Suicide risk 3.08 2.46 733.72 3.0 7.76 2.23 1410.53 8.0 -19.683 < .001 0.236 Depression 8.12 7.64 772.63 6.0 15.70 10.24 1154.44 15.0 -11.050 < .001 0.074 Hopelessness 2.68 2.99 789.14 2.0 4.80 4.48 1045.85 3.0 -7.519 < .001 0.034 Impulsivity 49.52 13.23 785.47 48.0 58.29 14.65 1069.99 58.0 -8.223 < .001 0.041 Note. M = Mean; SD = Standard Deviation; Mdn = Median; AR = Average Range; η2 = Eta Square. Table 2 shows the results of the correlational analysis of the various study variables using Spearman's Rho coefficient. Suicide risk and attempt correlated directly and signifi­ cantly (p < .001) with depression, hopelessness, and impulsivity. Table 3 presents two binary logistic regression models using the input method, in order to identify the role of depression, hopelessness, and impulsivity variables on the variance of suicide risk and attempt. The first model used the suicide risk factor and the second the history of a suicide attempt as a dependent variable. Depression, hopeless­ ness, and impulsivity were the independent variables. Both the first model, as assessed by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (χ2 = 7.830, df = 8, p = .750), and the second model (χ2 = 12.744, df = 8, p = .521), presented good indicators of goodness of fit. The Mediating Role of Impulsivity in Suicidal Risk 8 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2025, Vol. 7(2), Article e11331 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.11331 https://www.psychopen.eu/ Table 2 Spearman Correlation Coefficient (Rho) Between Suicide Risk and Attempt and the Variables of Depression, Hopelessness, and Impulsivity Variable 1 2 3 4 5 1. Suicide risk – 0.485** 0.679** 0.461** 0.474** 2. Suicide attempt – 0.273** 0.185** 0.203** 3. Depression – 0.516** 0.432** 4. Hopelessness – 0.362** 5. Impulsivity – **p < .001. Table 3 Binary Logistic Regression Analysis: Suicide Risk Factor and Suicide Attempt as Dependent Variables Variable β SE χ2 Wald df p OR 95% CI for OR LL UL Model 1. Suicide risk factor as a dependent variable Depression 0.153 0.012 169.694 1 < .001 1.166 1.139 1.193 Hopelessness 0.130 0.027 22.395 1 < .001 1.138 1.079 1.201 Impulsivity 0.036 0.006 36.967 1 < .001 1.036 1.025 1.048 Model 2. Suicide attempt history as a dependent variable Depression 0.069 0.011 41.677 1 < .001 1.072 1.050 1.095 Hopelessness 0.006 0.025 0.065 1 0.799 1.007 0.958 1.058 Impulsivity 0.025 0.006 16.511 1 < .001 1.025 1.013 1.038 The first model showed that the independent variables explained between 33% (R2 Cox and Snell = 0.334) and 49% (R 2 Nagelkerke = 0.486) of the suicide risk factor and the second model explained between 8% (R 2 Cox and Snell = 0.084) and 16% (R 2 Nagelkerke = 0.156) of the variation in a suicide attempt. The odds ratios (OR) show how much the probability of belonging to the suicide risk and attempt categories increases according to the variance of the independent variables. In Model 1, depression, hopelessness, and impulsivity increased the suicide risk factor. For Model 2, depression and impulsivity contributed a significant effect that increased the probability of suicide attempts. Hopelessness did not contribute a significant effect on a suicide attempt. To establish the total, direct and indirect standardized effects of the independent variables on suicide risk and attempt, two structural equation models were estimated using the generalized least squares method (Byrne, 2016). In the first model, the direct ef­ Gómez-Tabares, Arango-Tobón, Núñez, & Zapata Lesmes 9 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2025, Vol. 7(2), Article e11331 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.11331 https://www.psychopen.eu/ fect of the dependent variables depression, hopelessness, and impulsivity on suicide risk and suicide attempt was estimated, but it did not yield good goodness-of-fit indicators at the χ2 probability level and the RMSEA indicator, so the model was re-specified to improve goodness-of-fit indicators and establish patterns of association with mediating variables. In Model 2, impulsivity was used as a mediating variable between depression, hopelessness, suicidal risk, and suicide attempts. Additionally, suicide attempt was placed as a mediator between impulsivity and suicidal risk. This model obtained better good­ ness-of-fit indicators (see Table 4). Additionally, a sex invariance analysis was performed in order to corroborate whether Model 2 is equivalent between males and females (see Table 4). Table 4 Goodness-of-Fit Statistics of Structural Models for Predicting Suicide Risk and Suicide Attempt χ2 df χ2/df IFI CFI NFI TLI GFI AGFI RMSEA Model Model 1 15.618 2 7.809 0.984 0.984 0.982 0.921 0.996 0.971 0.064 Model 2 1.010* 1 1.010 1.000 1.000 0.999 1.000 0.999 0.996 0.002 Invariance by sex (male/female) of Model 2 Without restrictions 1.020* 2 0.510 1.001 1.000 0.999 1.011 0.999 0.996 0.000 Structural weights 6.933* 10 0.693 1.004 1.000 0.992 1.007 0.998 0.995 0.000 Structural covariance 8.768* 13 0.674 1.005 1.000 0.990 1.008 0.998 0.995 0.000 Structural waste 10.070* 16 0.629 1.007 1.000 0.988 1.009 0.998 0.995 0.000 *p ≥ .05. Table 4 shows the goodness-of-fit indices of Model 2, with different levels of restriction to assess sex invariance (male/female). When comparing the differences in CFI, values of ΔCFI ≤ 0.010 were observed, demonstrating the sex invariance of the proposed model. Figure 1 shows that the variables: depression, hopelessness, impulsivity, and previous suicide attempt explained 66% (R 2 = 0.655, p < .001) of the variation in suicidal risk. Depression and impulsivity variables contributed significant effects on suicide attempts (R 2 = 0.101, p < .001), and depression and hopelessness variables explained 21% (R 2 = 0.206, p < .001) of the variation in impulsivity. Likewise, it was found that impulsivity mediated the association between depression, hopelessness, and suicidal risk, on the one hand, and mediated the association between depression and suicide attempt, on the other hand, whose total direct and indirect effects were statistically significant (p < .001) (see Table 5). The Mediating Role of Impulsivity in Suicidal Risk 10 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2025, Vol. 7(2), Article e11331 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.11331 https://www.psychopen.eu/ Figure 1 Structural Equation Modeling of Suicide Risk and Attempt and the Mediating Role of Impulsivity Impulsivity Suicide risk e2 e1 R2 = .66** R2 = .21** β = .12** β = .37** Depression Hopelessness .63** Suicide attempt e3 R2 = .10** β = .35** **p < .001. Table 5 Standardized Total, Direct and Indirect Effects of Predictor Variables on Response Variables Effect Impulsivity (Mediator) Suicide attempt (Mediator) Suicide risk Value β CI 95% Value β CI 95% Value β CI 95% LL UL LL UL LL UL Hopelessness Total 0.122** 0.066 0.179 0.012** 0.005 0.022 0.141** 0.100 0.181 Direct 0.122** 0.066 0.179 – – – 0.116** 0.077 0.156 Indirect – – – 0.012** 0.005 0.022 0.024** 0.013 0.037 Depression Total 0.367** 0.311 0.420 0.297** 0.241 0.351 0.621** 0.582 0.659 Direct 0.367** 0.311 0.420 0.260** 0.199 0.320 0.458** 0.416 0.499 Indirect – – – 0.037** 0.017 0.058 0.163** 0.138 0.189 Impulsivity Total – – – 0.101** 0.046 0.154 0.199** 0.162 0.236 Direct – – – 0.101** 0.046 0.154 0.165** 0.131 0.199 Indirect – – – – – – 0.035** 0.016 0.054 Suicide attempt Total – – – – – – 0.346** 0.311 0.380 Direct – – – – – – 0.346** 0.311 0.380 Indirect – – – – – – – – – **p < .001. Gómez-Tabares, Arango-Tobón, Núñez, & Zapata Lesmes 11 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2025, Vol. 7(2), Article e11331 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.11331 https://www.psychopen.eu/ Table 5 shows the total, direct and indirect standardized effects of the independent, mediating and dependent variables. Depression contributed the largest total effect on im­ pulsivity, suicide attempt, and suicidal risk. Likewise, impulsivity is a mediator between depression and hopelessness, whose indirect effects were significant (p < .001). Since all direct and indirect effects are statistically significant, it can be concluded that the mediation effect of the impulsivity and suicide attempt variables is partial. Discussion The aim of the present study was to examine the role of impulsivity relative to depres­ sion and hopelessness in suicidal attempts and risk. We hypothesized that 1) depression, hopelessness, and impulsivity have direct effects on suicide risk and attempts, but the mechanism of influence among these predictors may not be the same as when analyzed together, and, therefore, 2) impulsivity may play a mediating role between depression and hopelessness and this role amplifies their direct or indirect effects on suicidal attempts and risk in youth. According to the results of our study, it is clear that depression, hopelessness, and impulsivity represent significant predictors and have effects on suicidal risk. Regarding our first hypothesis, the analyses suggest that people with greater depressive symptoms, feelings of hopelessness, and impulsivity are at greater risk of attempts and, thus, suicidal risk. These findings are consistent with the results of other studies in which lack of premeditation or difficulties in planning before making decisions, depressive symptoms, and hopelessness have been found to be direct predictors of suicide attempts in young people (Valderrama & Miranda, 2017; Yen et al., 2009). However, when analyzing the direct effects of depression, hopelessness, and impul­ sivity on suicidal attempts and risk, the model did not show optimal goodness-of-fit indicators (Model 1, Table 4). These results may indicate that although the existence of different significant predictors of suicidal behavior is clear as suggested by several meta-analyses (Ati et al., 2021; González Sancho & Picado Cortés, 2020; Hernández-Bello et al., 2020), these results may vary when analyzing the mechanisms by which these factors, along with others related to interpersonal functioning, interact (Joiner et al., 2009; O’Connor & Nock, 2014). Specifically, the perception of an inability adequately take responsibility for others, coupled with cognitions associated with dysfunctional affective bonds with other people or the social environment, plays a significant role (Van Orden et al., 2010). This finding is consistent with Wang et al. (2015), who demonstrated that the interac­ tion between depressive symptoms and impulsivity can significantly predict suicide risk. Furthermore, they found that impulsivity moderated the relationship between depression and suicide risk. In our study, impulsivity showed the strongest clear relationships with suicidal risk (r = 0.47) and depression (r = 0.43), indicating that people with more severe The Mediating Role of Impulsivity in Suicidal Risk 12 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2025, Vol. 7(2), Article e11331 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.11331 https://www.psychopen.eu/ depression tend to be more impulsive and have higher suicidal risk. This is consistent with studies that have analyzed risk factors and mediating effects between impulsivity and suicidal risk (Dvorak et al., 2013; Gómez-Tabares et al., 2020). This mechanism of interaction effects between depressive symptoms, feelings of hopelessness, and impulsivity with respect to suicidal risk and behavior has been ad­ dressed in different research (Javdani et al., 2011; Koyama et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2022) and indicates that the mediating effect of impulsivity is an important bridge between the relationships of depression and hopelessness. Regarding our second hypothesis, our study confirmed that those participants with higher suicide risk were those in whom depressive symptoms and hopelessness were mediated by impulsivity traits, in other words, impulsivity plays a mediating role between depression and hope­ lessness, and such a role increases the effect of both predictors on suicide risk. In addition, it was shown that the proposed model remains invariant when sex differences (male/female) are taken into account, reinforcing the idea that impulsivity is a strong psychological mechanism mediating the interactions between indicators of depression hopelessness, and suicidal behavior in a young population. Indeed, the results of suicidal ideation have shown significant indirect effects with risk behavior through impulsivity and low desire to live, but not through hopelessness (Smith & Wells, 2023), which leaves an interesting axis of research given that ideation and risk behaviors are associated with each other through impulsivity and desire to live. Meanwhile, our findings add to the knowledge so far of the mediating effect of impulsivity with respect to depression and hopelessness on suicidal attempts and risk and we can conclude that high levels of trait impulsivity increase the effect of depres­ sion and hopelessness on suicidal behavior, which is consistent with empirical evidence from cross-sectional and longitudinal studies where the mediating role of impulsivity on depression and hopelessness has been studied (Arango-Tobón et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2015). On the other hand, we found that impulsivity is also a mediator in the relationships between depression and suicidal attempts, an aspect that is often related to the association of reiterative death ideation and the presence of suicidal attempts (Sohn et al., 2021). Now, the correlations we found between impulsivity and suicidal intent are low but significant (r = 0.2) and may indicate that impulsivity has a direct effect on suicidal intent that consequently generates higher suicide risk in young people. Findings from studies such as that of Zhang et al. (2022) support the conclusion that individuals exhibiting impulsivity traits increase attempts and overall suicidal risk more. Having depressive symptoms and impulsivity traits maximizes the individual or joint effect of depression and hopelessness on suicidal behavior. Although the data collected allowed us to test the two central hypotheses of our study, it is important to point out some limitations. 1) The cross-sectional design and the unknown predictive validity of the probability of suicide in the sample reduces the Gómez-Tabares, Arango-Tobón, Núñez, & Zapata Lesmes 13 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2025, Vol. 7(2), Article e11331 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.11331 https://www.psychopen.eu/ explanatory capacity of our model on the mediating role of impulsivity in populations of young university students. Although there are advances in predictive models related to impulsivity, ideation, and suicidal risk (Beach et al., 2022), new studies that increase the explanatory capacity of statistical models that involve impulsivity as a mediator of suicidal risk are worthwhile. In this regard, it is necessary to consider that the study did not consider specific clinical aspects of physical and mental health as inclusion criteria, which may be expanded for analysis in future studies. Indeed, as proposed by Joiner (2005), Ma et al. (2016), Baertschi et al. (2017), and Chu et al. (2017), it is also necessary to examine other interpersonal variables to deter­ mine whether they moderate or mediate the relationship with suicide risk (Chu et al., 2016; O’Connor & Portzky, 2018). While the study's results show promise in explaining how impulsivity mediates the effect of depression and hopelessness on suicide risk, further exploration of the relationship with interpersonal variables in future studies may enhance the predictive scope for suicidal behavior (Joiner et al., 2009; Puzia et al., 2014). It is therefore suggested that these findings should be interpreted carefully and that more longitudinal studies are needed to provide predictive evidence of suicide and of the mediating or moderating role of impulsivity. 2) The use of self-report measures to establish depressive symptoms, hopelessness, and impulsivity may represent a bias in the information analyzed since self-reports are based on self-awareness and recall of behavioral patterns related to suicidal attempts and risk. 3) The sample is composed of young university students, and it is not clear that our results can be generalized to other populations, so it is suggested that this study could be replicated in other clinical or non-clinical samples. It would be desirable for future studies to analyze not only trait impulsivity but also impulsivity as a state, in order to analyze the effect that impulsivity as a psychological or neuropsychological characteristic may have on depression and hopelessness. Finally, it is suggested, as proposed by Anvar et al. (2022), to analyze im­ pulsivity in relation to the severity of emotional fluctuation, uncontrollability, dynamic course, and affective and cognitive precursors of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. The Mediating Role of Impulsivity in Suicidal Risk 14 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2025, Vol. 7(2), Article e11331 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.11331 https://www.psychopen.eu/ Funding: This study was funded by the Universidad Católica Luis Amigó, Medellín, Colombia [05020299123]. Acknowledgments: The authors would like to extend their gratitude to the study participants for their invaluable collaboration in completing the instruments, which were instrumental in obtaining information on the research variables. Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Ethics Statement: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Universidad Católica Luis Amigó (Colombia) in April 2022, through file number 65450. Informed consent was obtained from all participants to participate in this study. Reporting Guidelines: The JARS-Quant guidelines for non-experimental quantitative research were followed in this study. Preregistration: This study is not pre-registered. The study was registered at the Universidad Católica Luis Amigó, Medellín, Colombia [05020299123]. Data Availability: Data supporting the conclusions of this study are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author. Data are not publicly available due to ethical restrictions on informed consent. Supplementary Materials The Supplementary Materials contain the following items (for access, see Gómez-Tabares et al., 2025S): • Supplementary Table 1: Indicators of mental health events (suicide risk and attempt, depression, hopelessness, and impulsivity) • Supplementary Table 2: Sex differences in suicide risk and attempt, depression, hopelessness, and impulsivity Index of Supplementary Materials Gómez-Tabares, A. S., Arango-Tobón, O. E., Núñez, C., & Zapata Lesmes, G. A. (2025S). Supplementary materials to "The effect of depression and hopelessness on suicidal risk in young people: The mediating role of impulsivity" [Supplementary tables]. PsychOpen GOLD. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.16212 Gómez-Tabares, Arango-Tobón, Núñez, & Zapata Lesmes 15 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2025, Vol. 7(2), Article e11331 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.11331 https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.16212 https://www.psychopen.eu/ References Anestis, M. D., Soberay, K. A., Gutierrez, P. M., Hernández, T. D., & Joiner, T. E. (2014). Reconsidering the link between impulsivity and suicidal behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(4), 366–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314535988 Anvar, S., Swerdlow, B. A., Jobes, D., Timpano, K. R., Mandel, A. A., Kleiman, E., Joiner, T. E., & Johnson, S. L. (2022). Emotion-related impulsivity and suicidal ideation: Towards a more specific model. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(4), 1219–1235. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12383 Arango-Tobón, O. E., Gómez-Tabares, A. S., & Orejarena Serrano, S. J. (2021). Structural model of suicidal ideation and behavior: Mediating effect of impulsivity. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 93(Suppl. 4), Article e20210680. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202120210680 Ati, N. A. L., Paraswati, M. D., & Windarwati, H. D. (2021). What are the risk factors and protective factors of suicidal behavior in adolescents? A systematic review. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 34(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcap.12295 Baertschi, M., Costanza, A., Richard-Lepouriel, H., Pompili, M., Sarasin, F., Weber, K., & Canuto, A. (2017). The application of the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicide to a sample of Swiss patients attending a psychiatric emergency department for a non-lethal suicidal event. Journal of Affective Disorders, 210, 323–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.12.049 Beach, V. L., Gissandaner, T. D., & Schmidt, A. T. (2022). The UPPS Model of Impulsivity and Suicide: A systematic literature review. Archives of Suicide Research, 26(3), 985–1006. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2021.1892002 Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Terapia cognitiva de la depresión [Cognitive therapy of depression]. Desclee de Brouwer. Beck, A. T., Weissman, A., Lester, D., & Trexler, L. (1974). The measurement of pessimism: The Hopelessness Scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(6), 861–865. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037562 Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS (3rd ed.). Routledge. Chachín Pinzón, N., Moncada Duarte, C. E., & Acosta Salazar, H. U. (2019). Estudio de las propiedades psicométricas de la Escala Barratt de Impulsividad (BIS-11) en niños y adolescentes [Study of the psychometric properties of the Barratt Impulsivity Scale (BIS-11) in children and adolescents]. Terapia Psicológica, 37(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48082019000200129 Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5 Choi, H., & Shin, H. (2023). Entrapment, hopelessness, and cognitive control: A moderated mediation model of depression. Health Care, 11(8), Article 1065. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11081065 Chu, C., Buchman-Schmitt, J. M., Stanley, I. H., Hom, M. A., Tucker, R. P., Hagan, C. R., Rogers, M. L., Podlogar, M. C., Chiurliza, B., Ringer, F. B., Michaels, M. S., Patros, C. H. G., & Joiner, T. E. The Mediating Role of Impulsivity in Suicidal Risk 16 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2025, Vol. 7(2), Article e11331 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.11331 https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314535988 https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12383 https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202120210680 https://doi.org/10.1111/jcap.12295 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.12.049 https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2021.1892002 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037562 https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48082019000200129 https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5 https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11081065 https://www.psychopen.eu/ (2017). The interpersonal theory of suicide: A systematic review and meta-analysis of a decade of cross-national research. Psychological Bulletin, 143(12), 1313–1345. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000123 Chu, C., Rogers, M. L., & Joiner, T. E. (2016). Cross-sectional and temporal association between non-suicidal self-injury and suicidal ideation in young adults: The explanatory roles of thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness. Psychiatry Research, 246, 573–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.07.061 Cole, A. B., Littlefield, A. K., Gauthier, J. M., & Bagge, C. L. (2019). Impulsivity facets and perceived likelihood of future suicide attempt among patients who recently attempted suicide. Journal of Affective Disorders, 257, 195–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.07.038 Dat, N. T., Mitsui, N., Asakura, S., Watanabe, S., Takanobu, K., Fujii, Y., Toyoshima, K., Kako, Y., & Kusumi, I. (2021). The mediating role of hopelessness in the relationship between self-esteem, social anxiety, and suicidal ideation among Japanese university students who visited a university health care center. Journal of Affective Disorders Reports, 6, Article 100192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadr.2021.100192 Dumais, A., Lesage, A. D., Alda, M., Rouleau, G., Dumont, M., Chawky, N., & Turecki, G. (2005). Risk factors for suicide completion in major depression: A case-control study of impulsive and aggressive behaviors in men. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(11), 2116–2124. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.11.2116 Dutton, G. R., Bodell, L. P., Smith, A. R., & Joiner, T. E. (2013). Examination of the relationship between obesity and suicidal ideation. International Journal of Obesity, 37(9), 1282–1286. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2012.224 Dvorak, R. D., Lamis, D. A., & Malone, P. S. (2013). Alcohol use, depressive symptoms, and impulsivity as risk factors for suicide proneness among college students. Journal of Affective Disorders, 149(1-3), 326–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2013.01.046 Fritz, C. O., Morris, P. E., & Richler, J. J. (2012). Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024338 Gómez-Tabares, A. S. (2020). Psychosocial factors and clinical predictors of suicide risk in college students. Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.6092/2282-1619/mjcp-2602 Gómez-Tabares, A. S., Núñez, C., Osorio, M. P. A., & Aguirre, A. M. G. (2020). Risk and suicidal ideation and its relationship with impulsivity and depression in school adolescent. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnostico y Evaluacion – e Avaliação Psicológica, 54(1), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP54.1.12 Gómez-Tabares, A. S., Restrepo, J. E., Hincapié Aguirre, N., & González-Pérez, A. (2024). The mediating role of purpose in life in the relationship between hopelessness, depression, and suicide risk. Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.13129/2282-1619/MJCP-4047 Gómez-Tabares, Arango-Tobón, Núñez, & Zapata Lesmes 17 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2025, Vol. 7(2), Article e11331 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.11331 https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000123 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.07.061 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.07.038 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadr.2021.100192 https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.11.2116 https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2012.224 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2013.01.046 https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024338 https://doi.org/10.6092/2282-1619/mjcp-2602 https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP54.1.12 https://doi.org/10.13129/2282-1619/MJCP-4047 https://www.psychopen.eu/ González Sancho, R. D., & Picado Cortés, M. (2020). A systematic literature review on suicide: Risk and protection factors in Latin American youth 1995-2017. Actualidades en Psicología, 34(129), 47–69. https://doi.org/10.15517/ap.v34i129.34298 Hernández-Bello, L., Hueso-Montoro, C., Gómez-Urquiza, J. L., & Cogollo-Milanés, Z. (2020). Prevalencia y factores asociados a la ideación e intento de suicidio en adolescentes: Revisión sistemática [Prevalence and asociated factor for ideation and suicide attempt in adolescents: A systematic review]. Revista Española de Salud Pública, 94, Article e202009094. Horwitz, A. G., Berona, J., Czyz, E. K., Yeguez, C. E., & King, C. A. (2017). Positive and negative expectations of hopelessness as longitudinal predictors of depression, suicidal ideation, and suicidal behavior in high-risk adolescents. Suicide & Life-Threatening Behavior, 47(2), 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.12273 Instituto Nacional de Salud. (2023). Informe de Evento Primer Semestre Intento de Suicidio, 2023 [Event Report First Semester Attempted Suicide, 2023]. https://www.ins.gov.co/buscador-eventos/Informesdeevento/ INTENTO%20DE%20SUICIDIO%20PRIMER%20SEMESTRE%202023.pdf Javdani, S., Sadeh, N., & Verona, E. (2011). Suicidality as a function of impulsivity, callous- unemotional traits, and depressive symptoms in youth. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120(2), 400–413. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021805 Joiner, T. E. (2005). Why people die by suicide. Harvard University Press. Joiner, T. E., Van Orden, K. A., Witte, T. K., Selby, E. A., Ribeiro, J. D., Lewis, R., & Rudd, M. D. (2009). Main predictions of the interpersonal psychological theory of suicidal behavior: Empirical tests in two samples of young adults. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118(3), 634– 646. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016500 Koyama, E., Zai, C. C., Bryushkova, L., Kennedy, J. L., & Beitchman, J. H. (2020). Predicting risk of suicidal ideation in youth using a multigene panel for impulsive aggression. Psychiatry Research, 285, Article 112726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112726 Liu, S. T., Wu, X., Wang, N., Zhao, Q. Q., Xiao, L., Fang, C. K., Yu, Y., Lin, D. M., & Zhang, L. L. (2020). Serial multiple mediation of demoralization and depression in the relationship between hopelessness and suicidal ideation. Psycho-Oncology, 29(8), 1321–1328. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5439 Ma, J., Batterham, P. J., Calear, A. L., & Han, J. (2016). A systematic review of the predictions of the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicidal behavior. Clinical Psychology Review, 46, 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2016.04.008 Mann, J. J., Waternaux, C., Haas, G. L., & Malone, K. M. (1999). Toward a clinical model of suicidal behavior in psychiatric patients. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 156(2), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.156.2.181 National Institute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences [Instituto Nacional de Medicina Legal y Ciencias Forenses]. (2023). FORENSIS 2022. Datos para la vida [FORENSIS 2022. Data for life]. https://www.medicinalegal.gov.co/cifras-estadisticas/forensis The Mediating Role of Impulsivity in Suicidal Risk 18 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2025, Vol. 7(2), Article e11331 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.11331 https://doi.org/10.15517/ap.v34i129.34298 https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.12273 https://www.ins.gov.co/buscador-eventos/Informesdeevento/INTENTO%20DE%20SUICIDIO%20PRIMER%20SEMESTRE%202023.pdf https://www.ins.gov.co/buscador-eventos/Informesdeevento/INTENTO%20DE%20SUICIDIO%20PRIMER%20SEMESTRE%202023.pdf https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021805 https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016500 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112726 https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5439 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2016.04.008 https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.156.2.181 https://www.medicinalegal.gov.co/cifras-estadisticas/forensis https://www.psychopen.eu/ Núñez, C., Gómez-Tabares, A. S., Moreno Méndez, J. H., Agudelo Osorio, M. P., & Caballo, V. E. (2023). Predictive model of suicide risk in young people: The mediating role of alcohol consumption. Archives of Suicide Research, 27(2), 613–628. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2022.2029783 O’Connor, R. C., & Nock, M. K. (2014). The psychology of suicidal behaviour. The Lancet Psychiatry, 1(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(14)70222-6 O’Connor, R. C., & Portzky, G. (2018). Looking to the future: A synthesis of new developments and challenges in suicide research and prevention. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 2139. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02139 Oquendo, M. A., Baca-Garcia, E., Graver, R., Morales, M., Montalvan, V., & Mann, J. J. (2001). Spanish adaptation of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11). European Journal of Psychiatry, 15(3), 147–155. Patton, J. H., Stanford, M. S., & Barratt, E. S. (1995). Factor structure of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51(6), 768–774. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(199511)51:6<768::AID-JCLP2270510607>3.0.CO;2-1 Pineda-Roa, C. A., Campo-Arias, A., & Bello-Villanueva, A. M. (2024). Beck Hopelessness Scale-20: Dimensionality and nomological validity among Colombian school-age adolescents. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 47(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787231174479 Plutchik, R., & Van Praag, H. M. (1989). The measurement of suicidality, aggressivity and impulsivity. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, 13(Suppl. 1), S23– S34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-5846(89)90107-3 Puzia, M. E., Kraines, M. A., Liu, R. T., & Kleiman, E. M. (2014). Early life stressors and suicidal ideation: Mediation by interpersonal risk factors. Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 68– 72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.027 Rubio, G., Montero, I., Jáuregui, J., Villanueva, R., Casado, M. A., Marín, J. J., & Santo-Domingo, J. (1998). Validación de la escala de riesgo suicida de Plutchik en población española [Validation of the Plutchik's suicide risk scale in Spanish population]. Archivos de Neurobiología, 61(2), 143– 152. Rueda-Jaimes, G. E., Castro-Rueda, V. A., Rangel-Martínez-Villalba, A. M., Moreno-Quijano, C., Martinez-Salazar, G. A., & Camacho, P. A. (2018). Validación de la Escala de Desesperanza de Beck en pacientes con riesgo suicida [Validation of the Beck Hopelessness Scale in patients with suicidal risk]. Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental, 11(2), 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpsm.2016.09.004 Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Method of Psychological Research, 8(2), 23–74. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.12784 Smith, L. M., & Wells, T. T. (2023). Suicidal ideation and risky behavior are related through impulsivity and low wish to live. Archives of Suicide Research, 27(3), 1019–1033. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2022.2106921 Gómez-Tabares, Arango-Tobón, Núñez, & Zapata Lesmes 19 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2025, Vol. 7(2), Article e11331 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.11331 https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2022.2029783 https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(14)70222-6 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02139 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(199511)51:6<768::AID-JCLP2270510607>3.0.CO;2-1 https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787231174479 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-5846(89)90107-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.027 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpsm.2016.09.004 https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.12784 https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2022.2106921 https://www.psychopen.eu/ Sohn, M. N., McMorris, C. A., Bray, S., & McGirr, A. (2021). The Death–Implicit Association Test and suicide attempts: A systematic review and meta-analysis of discriminative and prospective utility. Psychological Medicine, 51(11), 1789–1798. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721002117 Stanford, M. S., Mathias, C. W., Dougherty, D. M., Lake, S. L., Anderson, N. E., & Patton, J. H. (2009). Fifty years of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale: An update and review. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(5), 385–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.008 Suárez-Colorado, Y., Palacio Sañudo, J., Caballero-Domínguez, C. C., & Pineda-Roa, C. A. (2019). Adaptación, validez de constructo y confiabilidad de la escala de riesgo suicida Plutchik en adolescentes colombianos [Adaptation, construct validity and reliability of the Plutchik suicide risk scale in Colombian adolescents]. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 51(3), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.2019.v51.n3.1 Swann, A. C., Steinberg, J. L., Lijffijt, M., & Moeller, F. G. (2008). Impulsivity: Differential relationship to depression and mania in bipolar disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders, 106(3), 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2007.07.011 Urrego Barbosa, S. C., Valencia Casallas, O. L., & Villalba, J. (2017). Validación de la escala barrat de impulsividad (BIS-11) en población bogotana [Validation of the barrat impulsivity scale (BIS-11) in Bogotana population]. Revista Diversitas, 13(2), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.15332/s1794-9998.2017.0002.01 Valderrama, J., & Miranda, R. (2017). Early life stress predicts negative urgency through brooding, depending on 5-HTTLPR genotype: A pilot study with 6-month follow-up examining suicide ideation. Psychiatry Research, 258, 481–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.08.092 Van Orden, K., Cukrowicz, K., Witte, T., & Joiner, T. (2010). The interpersonal theory of suicide. Psychological Review, 117(2), 575–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018697 Wang, Y. Y., Jiang, N. Z., Cheung, E. F., Sun, H. W., & Chan, R. C. (2015). Role of depression severity and impulsivity in the relationship between hopelessness and suicidal ideation in patients with major depressive disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders, 183, 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2015.05.001 World Health Organization. (2021). Suicide worldwide in 2019: Global health estimates. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240026643 Yen, S., Shea, M. T., Sanislow, C. A., Skodol, A. E., Grilo, C. M., Edelen, M. O., Stout, R. L., Morey, L. C., Zanarini, M. C., Markowitz, J. C., McGlashan, T. H., Daversa, M. T., & Gunderson, J. G. (2009). Personality traits as prospective predictors of suicide attempts. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 120(3), 222–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01366.x Zhang, J., Zhang, X., Yang, G., & Feng, Z. (2022). Impulsiveness indirectly affects suicidal ideation through depression and simultaneously moderates the indirect effect: A moderated mediation path model. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, Article 913680. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.913680 The Mediating Role of Impulsivity in Suicidal Risk 20 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2025, Vol. 7(2), Article e11331 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.11331 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721002117 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.008 https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.2019.v51.n3.1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2007.07.011 https://doi.org/10.15332/s1794-9998.2017.0002.01 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.08.092 https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018697 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2015.05.001 https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240026643 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01366.x https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.913680 https://www.psychopen.eu/ Clinical Psychology in Europe (CPE) is the official journal of the European Association of Clinical Psychology and Psychological Treatment (EACLIPT). PsychOpen GOLD is a publishing service by Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID), Germany. Gómez-Tabares, Arango-Tobón, Núñez, & Zapata Lesmes 21 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2025, Vol. 7(2), Article e11331 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.11331 https://www.psychopen.eu/ The Mediating Role of Impulsivity in Suicidal Risk (Introduction) Method Participants Instruments Procedure and Ethical Aspects Data Analysis Results Discussion (Additional Information) Funding Acknowledgments Competing Interests Ethics Statement Reporting Guidelines Preregistration Data Availability Supplementary Materials References