Between-Session Homework in Clinical Training and Practice: A Transtheoretical Perspective Scientific Update and Overview Between-Session Homework in Clinical Training and Practice: A Transtheoretical Perspective Truls Ryum 1 , Nikolaos Kazantzis 2,3 [1] Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. [2] Cognitive Behavior Therapy Research Unit, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. [3] Beck Institute for Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Research, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Clinical Psychology in Europe, 2024, Vol. 6(Special Issue), Article e12607, https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.12607 Received: 2023-08-15 • Accepted: 2023-11-12 • Published (VoR): 2024-04-26 Handling Editor: Wolfgang Lutz, Department of Psychology, University of Trier, Trier, Germany Corresponding Author: Truls Ryum, Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway. E-mail: truls.ryum@ntnu.no Related: This article is part of the CPE Special Issue “Transtheoretical Psychological Therapy – New Perspectives for Clinical Training and Practice”, Editors: Wolfgang Lutz & Winfried Rief, Clinical Psychology in Europe, 6(Special Issue), https://doi.org/10.32872/10.32872/cpe.v6.si Abstract Background: This paper defines and illustrates the ways in which Between-Session Homework (BSH) may be integrated into clinical work with clients across various treatment approaches. In line with the focus of this special issue, we explore how clinical training and supervision can enhance therapist skills and competence in the use of BSH. Method: After providing a brief historical overview and an integrative perspective on BSH, along with a review of empirical research supporting its efficacy, we delve into the discussion of BSH as a transtheoretical clinical method with heuristic value across different treatment approaches, such as cognitive-behavioral, psychodynamic, and humanistic-experiential therapies. Results: There exists diversity in how BSH is incorporated into distinct treatment approaches. Furthermore, we emphasize the significance of therapist skills and competence in utilizing BSH to facilitate client engagement and achieve positive treatment outcomes. Finally, we address how clinical training and supervision contribute to the development of these essential skills and competence. Conclusions: Our findings highlight three main points: (1) substantial empirical support for the integration of BSH within cognitive-behavioral therapies, (2) the potential of BSH as a promising transtheoretical clinical method, even though research beyond cognitive-behavioral therapies remains limited, and (3) the imperative need for further research into how clinical training and supervision can effectively enhance therapist skills and competence in implementing BSH. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, CC BY 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction, provided the original work is properly cited. https://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.32872/cpe.12607&domain=pdf&date_stamp=2024-04-26 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7313-5879 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9559-4160 https://www.psychopen.eu/ https://cpe.psychopen.eu/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Keywords homework, training, practice, trans-theoretical, evidence-based Highlights • Between-session homework (BSH) shows promise as a transtheoretical clinical method for clinical practice and training. • Therapist skills and competence in utilizing BSH are essential to facilitate client engagement with BSH and treatment outcomes. • Research into how clinical training and supervision can effectively enhance therapist skills and competence in implementing BSH is needed. A Brief Historical Overview of Between-Session Homework (BSH) The utilization of Between-Session Homework (BSH) holds a substantial historical sig­ nificance within behavioral and cognitive-behavioral therapies (CBT). It was initially introduced as a systematic strategy for promoting and sustaining behavior change in behavior therapy (Shelton & Ackerman, 1974; Shelton & Levy, 1981). As cognitive thera­ py gained prominence, the significance of between-session assignments in achieving suc­ cessful outcomes gathered momentum. Notably, Aaron T. Beck and colleagues dedicated a separate chapter to the use of BSH in their seminal clinical guide, "Cognitive therapy of depression" (Beck et al., 1979). While there has been a proliferation of training resources (e.g., Beck, 2020) and treatment manuals for specific disorders since then, there has also been a recent shift towards more integrative and transtheoretical models (e.g., Barlow et al., 2017; Barlow et al., 2011). Despite these changes, the importance of BSH remains a defining feature of CBT. This significance is underscored in the recent conceptual model proposed by Kazantzis and Miller (2022). In fact, the literature on homework is most advanced within CBT, with more research supporting its positive impact on outcomes compared to any other treatment component (see reviews in Kazantzis et al., 2018; Ryum et al., 2023a, 2023b). While BSH is considered a primary driver of change in CBT, it has received relatively less attention within psychodynamic (PDT) and humanistic-experiential therapies (HET). In these approaches, BSH is typically assigned a more supportive role in the therapeutic process and outcome. However, even Freud proposed the incorporation of between-ses­ sion activities in psychoanalysis (Freud, 1952), and subsequent psychodynamic authors have advocated for integrating BSH into psychodynamic therapy (e.g., McCullough, 2003; Stricker, 2006; Wachtel, 1977). This notion is further supported by surveys of practicing therapists, indicating that BSH is commonly utilized by both cognitive-behavioral and psychodynamic therapists (Fehm & Kazantzis, 2004; Kazantzis & Dattilio, 2010; Kazantzis, Lampropoulos, et al., 2005). Similarly, within humanistic-experiential therapies, the use A Transtheoretical Perspective on Between-Session Homework 2 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2024, Vol. 6(Special Issue), Article e12607 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.12607 https://www.psychopen.eu/ of BSH has been endorsed (e.g., Brodley, 2006; Greenberg & Warwar, 2006; Warwar & Ellison, 2019), although a comprehensive survey among practicing therapists is lacking to our knowledge. It is worth noting that the Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, Vol. 16, No. 2, featured a dedicated special issue on the topic of homework across various psychotherapeutic models. We note that there has also been substantial interest in the affiliated concept of “intersession experiences/ processes” (Orlinsky & Geller, 1993; Orlinsky et al., 1993), which builds upon psychodynamic- and transtheoretical theories, and refers to the cli­ ent’s (and therapist’s) spontaneous or intentional processing of psychotherapy between session, including thoughts, feelings, memories, and fantasies about the therapy or the therapist (Orlinsky et al., 1993). These experiences are internalized over the course of therapy, forming affect-laden representations, that influence on the therapeutic process and outcome (e.g., Hartmann et al., 2010; Hartmann et al., 2016; Zeeck & Hartmann, 2005). While both intersession processes and BSH concerns between-session activities, and client’s intersession experiences may relate to BSH, they differ fundamentally in the sense that BSH is planned, targeted, and negotiated between therapist and client through in-session dialogue, whereas intersession processes are not. We therefore refer interested readers to other sources for recent reviews on intersession processes (Gablonski et al., 2023; Stewart & Schröder, 2015). For similar reasons, we avoid further discussion of between-session activities that are primarily client-initiated (e.g., spontaneous implemen­ tation of treatment-related content in stressful situations), although such activities would clearly be considered therapeutic (see discussion in Brodley, 2006). Furthermore, while our primary focus here centers on individual therapy, it is also imperative to acknowledge the enduring interest in the utilization of BSH within the contexts of couples and family therapies. This enduring interest is evidenced through surveys conducted among practicing therapists and their clinical applications (Dattilio et al., 2011; Kazantzis et al., 2023). The pervasive employment of BSH is thus discernible across various psychotherapeutic approaches, to the extent that it has been posited as a potential 'common factor' (Kazantzis & Ronan, 2006). Nonetheless, disparities persist in the manner by which BSH is assimilated into clinical practices across these treatment ap­ proaches—an issue we shall expound upon. It is noteworthy to highlight that substantial endeavors have been undertaken to facilitate conciliation between therapeutic paradigms in the conceptualization of BSH as a transtheoretical method (a forthcoming special issue in the Journal of Clinical Psychology – In Session, 2024, delves into this matter). Importantly, an enduring interest in the application of BSH endures, both within the framework of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and across other diverse treatment methodologies (Ryum et al., 2023a, 2023b), with mounting empirical support that sub­ stantiates BSH as an evidence-based, transtheoretical method of significance for clinical practice and the training of clinical psychologists. Ryum & Kazantzis 3 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2024, Vol. 6(Special Issue), Article e12607 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.12607 https://www.psychopen.eu/ Between-Session Homework: An Integrative Perspective Numerous terms and definitions have been proposed to encapsulate the fundamental essence of Between-Session Homework within the context of psychotherapy. These designations, encompassing a range of connotations such as “homework,” “extra-therapy assignment,” and “home practice activities,” among others, do not inherently signify a transformation in the content, nature, or essential essence of BSH. In this paper, we adopt the term “Between-Session Homework,” recognizing the absence of a universally established terminology. Nonetheless, it is imperative to underscore that BSH serves as a conduit for fostering therapeutic advancement and ultimate treatment objectives. A comprehensive generic definition of BSH may be formulated as “activities enabling clients to assimilate information and extrapolate newfound insights from the therapeutic milieu into their everyday life contexts, wherein their challenges transpire.” This defini­ tion encompasses both “insight-oriented” elements such as information and awareness, and “action-oriented” components like new learning and skill acquisition, which have been posited as universal mechanisms for change in psychotherapeutic contexts (e.g., McCullough et al., 2003; Nelson et al., 2007; Ryum et al., 2014; Valen et al., 2011). Furthermore, this elucidation underscores the inherent reality that, for each therapeutic hour dedicated, the remaining 23 hours of the day are lived beyond the counseling environment. Thus, it intuitively follows that this time outside the therapy room should be harnessed to expedite the therapeutic process and advance toward ultimate treatment goals (Kazantzis, Deane, et al., 2005). Diversity characterizes the content and nature of BSH across distinct treatment meth­ odologies. The timing, inclusion, and modality of BSH in psychotherapy necessitate adaptability, both within and across therapeutic approaches. The specific nature of BSH tasks and the procedural dynamics within a therapeutic session with a given client are contingent upon an array of factors, including the unique requirements of the client, the rationale underpinning the chosen therapeutic approach, the client's stage of change (e.g., precontemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, maintenance; Prochaska & Norcross, 2018) and contextual variables. To elaborate further, BSH might encompass ac­ tivities such as relaxation training, exposure exercises (in vivo, imaginal, interoceptive), activity scheduling, behavioral activation, integration of newly acquired skills (e.g., ex­ perimenting with novel interpersonal strategies or modes of interpersonal engagement), behavioral experiments, and the acquisition of information and heightened awareness (e.g., recording automatic thoughts, attending to dreams or emotional responses). BSH can effectively address behaviors and symptoms linked to specific settings or individuals in the client's daily life beyond the therapeutic encounter, as exemplified in various anxiety disorders (e.g., agoraphobia, obsessive-compulsive disorder) or maladaptive inter­ personal patterns or self-other relational dynamics (e.g., personality disorders). A Transtheoretical Perspective on Between-Session Homework 4 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2024, Vol. 6(Special Issue), Article e12607 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.12607 https://www.psychopen.eu/ Amid this diversity, a central unifying rationale for BSH is the cultivation of learning in various forms (Kazantzis & L’Abate, 2007). BSH serves to inform, consolidate, expand, and reinforce the clinical work transpiring within the therapy session, enabling the con­ tinuation of therapeutic progress into the client's daily life where challenges most persist. The emphasis on BSH accentuates the client's active involvement in the therapeutic journey and may foster a sense of agency and responsibility for effecting positive change in their lives (Dobson, 2022; Dobson & Kazantzis, 2023; Strunk, 2022). Inherent to this endeavor is the promotion of a mindset characterized by curiosity, interest in one’s thoughts and emotions, and the cultivation of self-care and self-acceptance. Diverse perspectives arise when considering the in-session dynamics and therapist behaviors germane to the integration of BSH into psychotherapy. Notably contentious is the question of whether BSH should predominantly emanate from the therapist (Ellis, 1962), be initiated autonomously by the client (Brodley, 2006), or emerge through collab­ orative negotiation between therapist and client (Kazantzis et al., 2013; Kazantzis et al., 2017). In most cognitive and behavioral therapeutic modalities, the delineation, planning, and review of BSH are explicitly incorporated into the session agenda, ideally arrived at through collaborative empiricism between client and therapist. Homework assignments are meticulously tailored to the individual client, grounded in evidence-based therapeutic strategies and contextual considerations, often accentuating the specificity of the execu­ tion of BSH (e.g., how, when, where, duration, frequency, interpersonal involvement), thus augmenting the likelihood of successful outcomes (Hildebrand-Burke et al., 2023; Kazantzis & Miller, 2022). Conversely, psychodynamic and humanistic-experiential therapies typically do not accord the same explicit prominence to the selection, design, and review of BSH within the session context. These therapeutic paradigms lean historically towards a less specific stance, emphasizing in-session processes such as the client-therapist relationship and the exploration of subjective experiences, emotions, and meaning, in contrast to activities external to the session. Consequently, the introduction of BSH in these approaches is characterized by a more indirect and tentative manner; for instance, a humanistic-experi­ ential therapist might propose BSH as an optional experiment or as a potential avenue for the client's exploration if deemed beneficial (Brodley, 2006), for example, with the use of tasks to increase self-soothing capabilities or the use of a diary to promote emotional awareness. Meanwhile, a psychodynamic therapist might adopt a hypothetical approach to between-session assignments, such as positing, “I wonder what might have transpired had you...”, or even suggest more directively that the client tries out new interpersonal behaviors or ways of relating to others (Dimaggio et al., 2015). It is important to high­ light that a CBT therapist might also choose to use similar language and express a level of tentativeness. This approach could be prompted by their ongoing case formulation, suggesting that a straightforward expectation regarding BSH may potentially result in an alliance rupture. For instance, this might occur in situations involving an active abuse/ Ryum & Kazantzis 5 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2024, Vol. 6(Special Issue), Article e12607 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.12607 https://www.psychopen.eu/ mistrust schema being transferred to the therapist (refer to the discussion in Kazantzis et al., 2017). As previously alluded to, current trends in the field indicate a burgeoning framework for BSH underscored by integration and assimilation. For instance, BSH may encompass endeavors aimed at heightening client awareness regarding latent thoughts and emotions or promoting self-compassion and self-acceptance (Hayes, 2022). Irrespective of the pre­ cise nature of the homework task, it is crucial to underscore that the effective and successful utilization of BSH hinges on the establishment of a reciprocal and collabora­ tive therapeutic relationship, where the therapist's facilitative interpersonal skills are indispensable, and consensus between therapist and client prevails regarding the specific objectives and tasks of the therapeutic process (Kazantzis et al., 2017). These qualities appear to characterize the in-session process of integrating BSH across treatment ap­ proaches, as recently demonstrated (Ryum et al., 2024a, 2024b). In summary, the panorama of BSH in psychotherapy is characterized by a mosaic of perspectives, encompassing diverse terms and definitions, multifaceted modalities, and a rich interplay between therapist and client. Amid this diversity, a common thread of fostering learning and facilitating therapeutic progress emerges, with a recognition of the client's active engagement and empowerment. The process of integrating BSH into psychotherapy is contingent upon the treatment approach, necessitating nuanced consid­ erations, yet grounded in the shared commitment to advancing the client's well-being and progress towards treatment goals. Empirical Research on the Relations Between BSH and Outcome Numerous studies have extensively investigated the relationship between BSH and treat­ ment outcomes, and their findings have been synthesized in multiple meta-analyses and reviews (for a recent comprehensive overview, refer to Ryum et al., 2023b). The majority of earlier publications have focused on three primary areas: (a) assessing the causal impact of homework on treatment outcomes by comparing interventions with and without homework (Kazantzis et al., 2000; Kazantzis, Whittington, et al., 2010); (b) examining the correlation between client compliance with homework and treatment outcomes (Kazantzis, Whittington, et al., 2010; Kazantzis et al., 2016; Mausbach et al., 2010); and (c) investigating therapist skills and competence in assigning homework and their connection to engagement with BSH and treatment outcomes (therapist behaviors), see special issue in Cognitive Therapy and Research (Vol. 45, No. 2). Causal effects analysis has reported a medium effect size (d = .53) (Kazantzis et al., 2000; Kazantzis, Whittington, et al., 2010), while a significant linear association (r = .26) has been identified between client compliance with homework and treatment outcomes (Mausbach et al., 2010; see also Kazantzis, Whittington, et al., 2010). Recent meta-anal­ A Transtheoretical Perspective on Between-Session Homework 6 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2024, Vol. 6(Special Issue), Article e12607 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.12607 https://www.psychopen.eu/ yses have further validated these findings concerning both the quantity and quality of homework engagement in relation to treatment outcomes (Kazantzis et al., 2016), including a specific examination of obsessive-compulsive disorder (Wheaton & Chen, 2021). Collectively, these findings underscore that interventions incorporating BSH yield superior outcomes in contrast to those lacking BSH, and that greater client engagement with homework corresponds to better treatment results. More recent research has progressively highlighted the pivotal role of therapists' skills and competence in integrating BSH to facilitate client engagement with homework (as explored in research question C above). For instance, investigations have revealed that therapist competence in homework review (Bryant et al., 1999; Weck et al., 2013), as well as homework selection and planning (Conklin et al., 2018; Jungbluth & Shirk, 2013; Ryum et al., 2010), correlates with treatment outcomes. Notably, these effects remain robust even when accounting for confounding variables like the therapeutic alliance (McEvoy et al., 2023; Ryum et al., 2022), and studies have also incorporated client feedback in studies of therapist competence in using homework (Hildebrand-Burke et al., 2023; Yew et al., 2021). These findings indicate that the positive impact of BSH extends beyond mere client compliance, emphasizing therapists' pivotal role in facilitat­ ing client engagement with homework. Furthermore, a recent review conducted as part of the interorganizational Task Force on Psychotherapy Skills and Methods That Work (Hill & Norcross, 2023) comprehensively summarized findings on therapist behaviors affecting immediate (in-session) and intermediate (session-to-session) outcomes of BSH. The review observed favorable effects on intermediate outcomes, while results for imme­ diate outcomes were mixed and generally neutral (Ryum et al., 2023b). The Task Force concluded that BSH demonstrates efficacy for ultimate treatment outcomes and likely effectiveness for intermediate outcomes (Hill & Norcross, 2023). However, amidst largely positive results, research has also illuminated challenges that clients may encounter with BSH, stemming from practical and emotional factors, which could impede therapeutic progress and potentially lead to premature discontinuation. Some clients may exhibit adverse reactions to the term “homework” due to its educa­ tional connotations, invoking feelings of apprehension linked to evaluation, control, or failure (Fehm & Kazantzis, 2004; Kazantzis, Arntz, et al., 2010). Consequently, the use of this term in clinical practice is not recommended (Kazantzis, MacEwan, et al., 2005), and an alternative, “action plan,” has been proposed within CBT (Kazantzis & Miller, 2022). Additionally, BSH may induce pressure, anxiety, resistance, or exacerbate mood-related issues for various reasons (e.g., lack of comprehension regarding homework rationale, overly demanding assignments due to symptom severity), with some clients identifying it as the foremost challenge in treatment. Consequently, therapists should anticipate potential obstacles, maintain receptivity to client feedback, and establish a collaborative atmosphere where engagement with BSH is discussed through Socratic dialogue and monitored via feedback on session-relevant aspects (Kazantzis et al., 2017). Ryum & Kazantzis 7 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2024, Vol. 6(Special Issue), Article e12607 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.12607 https://www.psychopen.eu/ It should also be recognized that (persistent) non-engagement with BSH may be a way for the client to oppose treatment and/ or the therapist (Okamoto et al., 2019; Okamoto & Kazantzis, 2021; Safran & Muran, 2000; Sijercic et al., 2016). Strong needs for dominance or attachment may be evoked in certain clients, within a therapeutic relationship characterized by giving and receiving help and care, and client non-engage­ ment with BSH may therefore sometimes signal a rupture in the therapeutic alliance (Kazantzis et al., 2023). Although there is little conclusive research in this area, we may speculate if certain client populations are at a higher risk for non-engagement with BSH, for example, as for clients presenting with personality disorders or severe eating disor­ ders. However, in general, we caution against “blaming the client”, and rather suggest that therapists should examine their own contribution in the process when accounting for client’s non-engagement with BSH. Notably, empirical investigations and reviews of BSH have mainly been conducted within cognitive and behavioral treatment frameworks, with rare exceptions emerging from psychodynamic (Hilsenroth & Slavin, 2008; Nelson & Castonguay, 2017; Owen et al., 2012) and humanistic-experiential approaches. While research underscores BSH's clinical relevance for training and practice, as we will explore in the subsequent section, the generalizability of these findings to alternative treatment methodologies remains uncertain. Clinical Practice and Training Drawing upon theoretical writings and empirical research spanning five decades, our current understanding of the factors that can either facilitate or hinder the effective inte­ gration of homework into psychotherapy has become more comprehensive. These factors hold significant relevance for clinical training and practice. A comprehensive practical guide for the utilization of homework already exists in CBT (Kazantzis, MacEwan, et al., 2005). Additionally, an updated and comprehensive model was recently published (Kazantzis & Miller, 2022), which could provide valuable insights for integrating BSH into other therapeutic approaches. In the following sections, we delve into strategies that therapists can employ to enhance client engagement with BSH and discuss how clinical training and supervision can bolster therapist skills and competence in implementing BSH. Clinical Practice While the term "homework" is commonly associated with specific tasks assigned to cli­ ents, it also encompasses an in-session process reliant on a collaborative client-therapist relationship. Therapist behaviors play a crucial role in helping clients establish realistic expectations about the role of BSH, fostering engagement with homework, and facili­ A Transtheoretical Perspective on Between-Session Homework 8 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2024, Vol. 6(Special Issue), Article e12607 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.12607 https://www.psychopen.eu/ tating symptom improvement. Drawing from practical guides and empirical research, therapists should: (a) collaboratively design, plan, and review BSH in alignment with the client's goals and values; (b) link BSH with takeaways from the session; (c) provide a compelling rationale for homework; (d) address potential challenges and barriers to task engagement; (e) offer a written BSH summary including instructions and rationale; (f) incorporate client feedback when selecting, planning, and reviewing BSH; and (g) remain responsive to the evolving needs and context of the client (Kazantzis, MacEwan, et al., 2005; Kazantzis & Miller, 2022; Ryum et al., 2023a, 2023b). Feedback here refers primarily to the therapist eliciting reactions and input from the client in the on-going therapeutic dialogue (e.g., beliefs about BSH; barriers to engagement; reactions to in-session practice; degree of skill acquisition or mastery), and not to more formal methods such as “routine outcome monitoring” (Lambert & Shimokawa, 2011). Although “compliance” or “adherence” have historically been associated with BSH, the concept of “engagement” has been proposed as a more meaningful construct for research and clinical practice (Kazantzis & Miller, 2022). Beyond merely measuring com­ pleted BSH tasks, a comprehensive assessment of client engagement should encompass potential practical obstacles, task-related difficulties (or perceived difficulties), activation of personal beliefs, and associated emotional distress (Kazantzis, MacEwan, et al., 2005). For instance, a client might view a homework task as “too challenging” or “irrelevant,” leading to negative beliefs about themselves or the therapeutic process. While tracking homework completion remains informative (as compliance is linked to improvement), therapists should also explore client beliefs about BSH benefits, perceived progress contribution, skill acquisition, and encountered obstacles. The Homework Rating Scale- Revised (HRS-II; Kazantzis, Deane, et al., 2005, available from www.cbtru.com) stands as a validated tool towards these goals, and is suitable for research, clinical training, and practice. Regardless of the specific task, BSH should be framed as an opportunity for learning, even when tasks don't proceed as planned. Therapists might harbor assumptions that hinder the integration of BSH into therapy (Bunnell et al., 2021). Negative attitudes, such as viewing homework as exclusively for distressed clients or fearing it might overstructure the client, should be treated as hypotheses rather than established facts. Integrating BSH should entail Socratic dialogue and feedback solicitation from clients. Moreover, therapists' interpersonal styles or core schemas could impede effective BSH integration, manifesting as “demanding standards” or “excessive self-sacrifice” (Haarhoff & Kazantzis, 2007; Kazantzis et al., 2017). Clinical Training Although research supports the efficacy of BSH for treatment outcomes, empirical in­ vestigations into how clinical training and supervision enhance therapists' acquisition and proficient use of BSH are lacking. This gap mirrors the broader dearth of evidence- based training research in the field (Callahan & Watkins, 2018), and the need for future Ryum & Kazantzis 9 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2024, Vol. 6(Special Issue), Article e12607 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.12607 http://www.cbtru.com https://www.psychopen.eu/ research utilizing controlled, longitudinal designs (see Brattland et al., 2022). We propose recommendations for clinical training based on practice guidelines and insights from process-outcome research (Kazantzis & Miller, 2022; Ryum et al., 2023a, 2023b). While reading materials and didactic courses grant trainee therapists a conceptual understanding of BSH integration, hands-on practical experiences hold even greater importance. Clinical work necessitates practical skills and competencies, and direct en­ gagement with BSH is pivotal for novice and seasoned therapists alike (see Kazantzis et al., 2017 for competence frameworks for collaborative work in CBT). Competent and skillful BSH utilization hinges on the therapeutic approach, case conceptualization, contextual factors, and in-session dynamics. This complex clinical method defies full standardization but should be informed by practical guidelines. Thus, learning “what works” with various clients and effectively addressing resistance or difficulties requires firsthand experience. Although evaluating how well a therapist sets agendas is relatively straightforward, gauging skilled BSH implementation demands more nuanced expertise. Role-plays and deliberate practice are effective tools for honing BSH skills in early therapists. Developing standardized stimuli-clips depicting challenging integration sce­ narios could also enhance training. Nonetheless, supervision of sessions with actual clients, whether through video recordings or direct observation, remains the optimal method for therapists to receive constructive feedback on BSH application. This process can be reinforced using validated measures of therapist behaviors pertinent to BSH, such as the Homework Adherence and Competence Scale (HAACS; Kazantzis, Wedge, et al., 2005, available from www.cbtru.com) or the Homework-Specific Therapist Behaviors Scale (HSTBS; Conklin et al., 2018). These tools aid trainees in identifying and addressing skill gaps related to task selection, planning, review, and overcoming obstacles, and could be used in supervision. Complementing this, a validated measure of client engagement and beliefs, like the HRS-II, could provide insights into client perspectives on BSH, and suggest areas that warrant further attention, exploration, and discussion between therapist and client (e.g., negative beliefs about a specific task; lack of comprehension, rationale, or specificity, etc.), although the scale does not have specific cut-offs. Conclusions There has been more research on the use of BSH in CBT compared to that of other therapist interventions/ methods, and sufficient empirical evidence to consider BSH a demonstrable efficacious method for ultimate treatment outcomes. While empirical support is lacking for other treatment approaches, there is diversity in how BSH may be integrated into clinical work within and across treatment approaches, and we propose that BSH should be considered a transtheoretical method with heuristic value also for psychodynamic and humanistic-experiential therapies. For example, BSH may facilitate the treatment process and outcome by promoting experiential awareness, insight, or the A Transtheoretical Perspective on Between-Session Homework 10 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2024, Vol. 6(Special Issue), Article e12607 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.12607 http://www.cbtru.com https://www.psychopen.eu/ discovery of new meaning; behavior change and the acquisition of new adaptive skills; the generalization of new learning from the counseling room and into the everyday-life of the client; and a sense of agency and confidence in clients that they may play an active role in their own change-process. Furthermore, empirical evidence highlights specific therapist behaviors linked to skillful BSH utilization, such as presenting a compelling rationale, collaborative planning, addressing challenges, and assigning personalized tasks. These behaviors should be cen­ tral in clinical practice and training. However, empirical research on how to enhance therapist competence and skill in BSH remains scarce, urging clinicians and researchers to prioritize this vital avenue of inquiry in the future. Funding: The authors have no funding to report. Acknowledgments: The authors have no additional (i.e., non-financial) support to report. Competing Interests: Nikolaos Kazantzis discloses his royalties from Guilford, Oxford, Routledge, and Springer Nature publishers. Truls Ryum declares no conflict of interest. References Barlow, D. H., Farchione, D., Bullis, J. R., Gallagher, M. W., Murray-Latin, H., Sauer-Zavala, S., Bentley, K. H., Thompson-Hollands, J., Conklin, L. R., Boswell, J. F., Ametaj, A., Carl, J. R., Boettcher, H. T., & Cassiello-Robbins, C. (2017). The Unified Protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders compared with diagnosis-specific protocols for anxiety disorders: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA Psychiatry, 74(9), 875–884. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.2164 Barlow, D. H., Farchione, T. J., Fairholme, C. P., Ellard, K. K., Boisseau, C. L., Allen, L. B., & Ehrenreich-May, J. (2011). Unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders: Therapist guide. Oxford University Press. Beck, A. T., Rush, J., Shaw, B., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. Guilford Press. Beck, J. S. (2020). Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond (3rd ed.). Guilford Press. Brattland, H., Holgersen, K. H., Vogel, P. A., Anderson, T., & Ryum, T. (2022). An apprenticeship model in the training of psychotherapy students: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial and qualitative investigation. PLoS One, 17(8), Article e0272164. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272164 Brodley, B. (2006). Client-initiated homework in client-centered therapy. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 16(2), 140–161. https://doi.org/10.1037/1053-0479.16.2.140 Bryant, M. J., Simons, A. D., & Thase, M. E. (1999). Therapist skill and patient variables in homework compliance: Controlling an uncontrolled variable in cognitive therapy outcome Ryum & Kazantzis 11 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2024, Vol. 6(Special Issue), Article e12607 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.12607 https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.2164 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272164 https://doi.org/10.1037/1053-0479.16.2.140 https://www.psychopen.eu/ research. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 23(4), 381–399. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018703901116 Bunnell, B. E., Nemeth, L. S., Lenert, L. A., Kazantzis, N., Deblinger, E., Higgins, K. A., & Ruggiero, K. J. (2021). Barriers associated with the implementation of homework in youth mental health treatment and potential mobile health solutions. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 45(2), 272– 286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-020-10090-8 Callahan, J. L., & Watkins, C. E. (2018). Evidence-based training: The time has come. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 12(4), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000204 Conklin, L. R., Strunk, D. R., & Cooper, A. A. (2018). Therapist behaviors as predictors of immediate homework engagement in cognitive therapy for depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 42(1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-017-9873-6 Dattilio, F. M., Kazantzis, N., Shinkfield, G., & Carr, A. G. (2011). A survey of homework use, experience of barriers to homework, and attitudes about the barriers to homework among couples and family therapists. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 37(2), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00223.x Dimaggio, G., Salvatore, G., Lysaker, P. H., Ottavi, P., & Popolo, R. (2015). Behavioral activation revisited as a key principle of change in personality disorders psychotherapy. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 25(1), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038769 Dobson, K. S. (2022). Therapeutic relationship. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 29(3), 541–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2022.02.006 Dobson, K. S., & Kazantzis, N. (2023). Therapeutic relationships in cognitive behavioral therapy: Tailoring the therapeutic alliance. Psychotherapy Research, 33(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2023.2177942 Ellis, A. (1962). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. Lyle Stuart. Fehm, L., & Kazantzis, N. (2004). Attitudes and use of homework assignments in therapy: A survey of German psychotherapists. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 11(5), 332–343. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.419 Freud, S. (1952). Inhibitions, symptoms and anxiety (A. Strachey, Trans.). In R. M. Hutchins (Ed.), Great books of the Western world (pp. 718-734). Encyclopedia Britannica. (Original work published in 1926) Gablonski, T. C., Herrmann, P. L., Luedemann, J., & Andreas, S. (2023). Intersession experiences and internalized representations of psychotherapy: A scoping review. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 79(8), 1875–1901. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23502 Greenberg, L. S., & Warwar, S. H. (2006). Homework in an emotion-focused approach to experiential therapy. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 16(2), 178–200. https://doi.org/10.1037/1053-0479.16.2.178 Haarhoff, B. A., & Kazantzis, N. (2007). How to supervise the use of homework in cognitive- behavior therapy: The role of trainee therapist beliefs. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 14(3), 325–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2006.08.004 A Transtheoretical Perspective on Between-Session Homework 12 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2024, Vol. 6(Special Issue), Article e12607 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.12607 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018703901116 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-020-10090-8 https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000204 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-017-9873-6 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00223.x https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038769 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2022.02.006 https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2023.2177942 https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.419 https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23502 https://doi.org/10.1037/1053-0479.16.2.178 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2006.08.004 https://www.psychopen.eu/ Hartmann, A., Orlinsky, D., Weber, S., Sandholz, A., & Zeeck, A. (2010). Session and intersession experience related to treatment outcome in bulimia nervosa. Psychotherapy, 47(3), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021166 Hartmann, A., Zeeck, A., Herzog, W., Wild, B., de Zwaan, M., Herpertz, S., Burgmer, M., von Wietersheim, J., Tagay, S., Dinkel, A., Löwe, B., Resmark, G., Orlinsky, D., & Zipfel, S. (2016). The intersession process in psychotherapy for anorexia nervosa: Characteristics and relation to outcome. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 72(9), 861–879. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22293 Hayes, S. C. (2022). Acceptance and defusion. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 29(3), 571–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2022.01.005 Hildebrand-Burke, C., Davey, C., Gwini, S., Catania, L., & Kazantzis, N. (2023). Therapist competence, homework engagement, and client characteristics in CBT for youth depression: A study of mediation and moderation in a community-based trial. Psychotherapy Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2023.2267166 Hill, C. E., & Norcross, J. C. (2023). Psychotherapy skills and methods that work. Oxford University Press. Hilsenroth, M. J., & Slavin, J. M. (2008). Integrative dynamic treatment for comorbid depression and borderline conditions. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 18(4), 377–409. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014317 Jungbluth, N. J., & Shirk, S. R. (2013). Promoting homework adherence in cognitive-behavioral therapy for adolescent depression. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 42(4), 545–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2012.743105 Kazantzis, N., Arntz, A. R., Borkovec, T., Holmes, E. A., & Wade, T. (2010). Unresolved issues regarding homework assignments in cognitive and behavioural therapies: An expert panel discussion at AACBT. Behaviour Change, 27(3), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1375/bech.27.3.119 Kazantzis, N., & Dattilio, F. M. (2010). Definitions of homework, types of homework, and ratings of the importance of homework among psychologists with cognitive behavior therapy and psychoanalytic theoretical orientations. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 66(7), 758–773. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20699 Kazantzis, N., Dattilio, F. M., Cummins, A., & Clayton, X. (2013). Homework assignments and self- monitoring. In S. G. Hofman, D. J. A. Dozois, W. Rief, & J. Smits (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of cognitive behavioral therapy (Vol. 1, pp. 311-330). John Wiley & Sons. Kazantzis, N., Dattilio, F. M., & Dobson, K. S. (2017). The therapeutic relationship in cognitive- behavioral therapy: A clinician's guide. Guilford Press. Kazantzis, N., Dattilio, F. M., Shinkfield, G., & Petrik, A. M. (2023). Clinician experiences of homework in couples and family therapy: A survey of perceived impact on the working alliance. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 64(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12861 Kazantzis, N., Deane, F. P., & Ronan, K. R. (2000). Homework assignments in cognitive and behavioral therapy: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 7(2), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.7.2.189 Ryum & Kazantzis 13 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2024, Vol. 6(Special Issue), Article e12607 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.12607 https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021166 https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22293 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2022.01.005 https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2023.2267166 https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014317 https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2012.743105 https://doi.org/10.1375/bech.27.3.119 https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20699 https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12861 https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.7.2.189 https://www.psychopen.eu/ Kazantzis, N., Deane, F. P., Ronan, K. R., & L’Abate, L. (2005). Using homework assignments in cognitive behavior therapy. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group; US. Kazantzis, N., & L’Abate, L. (2007). Handbook of homework assignments in psychotherapy: Research, practice, prevention. Springer Science. Kazantzis, N., Lampropoulos, G. K., & Deane, F. P. (2005). A national survey of practicing psychologists’ use and attitudes toward homework in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(4), 742–748. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.4.742 Kazantzis, N., Luong, H. K., Usatoff, A. S., Impala, T., Yew, R. Y., & Hofmann, S. G. (2018). The processes of cognitive behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 42(4), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-018-9920-y Kazantzis, N., MacEwan, J., & Dattilio, F. M. (2005). A guiding model for practice. In N. Kazantzis, F. P. Deane, K. R. Ronan, & L. L'Abate (Eds.), Using homework assignments in cognitive behavior therapy (pp. 359-407). Routledge. Kazantzis, N., & Miller, A. R. (2022). A comprehensive model of homework in cognitive behavior therapy. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 46(1), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-021-10247-z Kazantzis, N., & Ronan, K. R. (2006). Can between-session (homework) activities be considered a common factor in psychotherapy? Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 16(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/1053-0479.16.2.115 Kazantzis, N., Wedge, P., & Dobson, K. S. (2005). Homework Adherence and Competence Scale (HAACS). Unpublished scale. Available from https://www.cbtru.com Kazantzis, N., Whittington, C., & Dattilio, F. (2010). Meta-analysis of homework effects in cognitive and behavioral therapy: A replication and extension. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 17(2), 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.2010.01204.x Kazantzis, N., Whittington, C., Zelencich, L., Kyrios, M., Norton, P. J., & Hofmann, S. G. (2016). Quantity and quality of homework compliance: A meta-analysis of relations with outcome in cognitive behavior therapy. Behavior Therapy, 47(5), 755–772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2016.05.002 Lambert, M. J., & Shimokawa, K. (2011). Collecting client feedback. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022238 Mausbach, B. T., Moore, R., Roesch, S., Cardenas, V., & Patterson, T. L. (2010). The relationship between homework compliance and therapy outcomes: An updated meta-analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 34(5), 429–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-010-9297-z McCullough, L. (2003). Treating affect phobia: A manual for short-term dynamic psychotherapy. Guilford Press. McCullough, L., Larsen, A. E., Schanche, E., Andrews, S., Kuhn, N., Hurley, C. L., Carley, M., Francis-Ranier, E., Cui, X. j., Meyer, S., Schlager, E., Ewalt, S., & Wolf, J. (2003). Achievement of Therapeutic Objectives Scale: ATOS scale. https://affectphobiatherapy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/ATOS-scale-manual.pdf A Transtheoretical Perspective on Between-Session Homework 14 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2024, Vol. 6(Special Issue), Article e12607 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.12607 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.4.742 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-018-9920-y https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-021-10247-z https://doi.org/10.1037/1053-0479.16.2.115 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.2010.01204.x https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2016.05.002 https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022238 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-010-9297-z https://affectphobiatherapy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/ATOS-scale-manual.pdf https://www.psychopen.eu/ McEvoy, P. M., Bendlin, M., Johnson, A. R., Kazantzis, N., Campbell, B. N. C., Bank, S. R., & Egan, S. J. (2023). The relationships among working alliance, group cohesion and homework engagement in group cognitive behaviour therapy for social anxiety disorder. Psychotherapy Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2022.2161966 Nelson, D. L., & Castonguay, L. G. (2017). The systematic use of homework in psychodynamic- interpersonal psychotherapy for depression: An assimilative integration approach. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 27(2), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1037/int0000063 Nelson, D. L., Castonguay, L. G., & Barwick, F. (2007). Directions for the integration of homework in practice. In N. Kazantzis & L. L'Abate (Eds.), Handbook of homework assignments in psychotherapy: Research, practice, prevention (pp. 425-444). Springer Science. Okamoto, A., Dattilio, F. M., Dobson, K. S., & Kazantzis, N. (2019). The therapeutic relationship in cognitive-behavioral therapy: Essential features and common challenges. Practice Innovations, 4(2), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1037/pri0000088 Okamoto, A., & Kazantzis, N. (2021). Alliance ruptures in cognitive-behavioral therapy: A cognitive conceptualization. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 77(2), 384–397. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23116 Orlinsky, D. E., & Geller, J. D. (1993). Patients' representations of their therapists and therapy: New measures. In J. Barber & J. Docherty (Eds.), Psychodynamic treatment research (pp. 423-466). Basic Books. Orlinsky, D. E., Geller, J. D., Tarragona, M., & Farber, B. (1993). Patients representations of psychotherapy – A new focus for psychodynamic research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(4), 596–610. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.61.4.596 Owen, J., Quirk, K., Hilsenroth, M. J., & Rodolfa, E. (2012). Working through: In-session processes that promote between-session thoughts and activities. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59(1), 161–167. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023616 Prochaska, J. O., & Norcross, J. C. (2018). Systems of psychotherapy: A transtheoretical analysis (9th ed.). Oxford University Press. Ryum, T., Bennion, M., & Kazantzis, N. (2023a). Integrating between-session homework. In C. Hill & J. C. Norcross (Eds.), Psychotherapy methods and skills that work (pp. 247-280). Oxford. Ryum, T., Bennion, M., & Kazantzis, N. (2023b). Integrating between-session homework in psychotherapy: A systematic review of immediate in-session and intermediate outcomes. Psychotherapy, 60(3), 306–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000488 Ryum, T., Bennion, M., & Kazantzis, N. (2024a). Between-session homework and processes of change [Commentary]. Journal of Clinical Psychology: In Session, 80(4), 928–937. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23628 Ryum, T., Bennion, M., & Kazantzis, N. (2024b). Homework as a driver of change in psychotherapy [Introduction]. Journal of Clinical Psychology: In Session, 80(4), 733–743. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23627 Ryum, T., Stiles, T. C., Svartberg, M., & McCullough, L. (2010). The effects of therapist competence in assigning homework in cognitive therapy with cluster c personality disorders: Results from a Ryum & Kazantzis 15 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2024, Vol. 6(Special Issue), Article e12607 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.12607 https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2022.2161966 https://doi.org/10.1037/int0000063 https://doi.org/10.1037/pri0000088 https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23116 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.61.4.596 https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023616 https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000488 https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23628 https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23627 https://www.psychopen.eu/ randomized controlled trial. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 17(3), 283–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2009.10.005 Ryum, T., Store-Valen, J., Svartberg, M., Stiles, T. C., & McCullough, L. (2014). Factor analysis of the Achievement of Therapeutic Objectives Scale (ATOS) in short-term dynamic psychotherapy and cognitive therapy. Psychological Assessment, 26(3), 925–934. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036570 Ryum, T., Svartberg, M., & Stiles, T. C. (2022). Homework assignments, agenda setting and the therapeutic alliance in cognitive therapy with cluster c personality disorders: Synergetic or antagonistic ingredients? Cognitive Therapy and Research, 46(2), 448–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-021-10268-8 Safran, J. D., & Muran, J. C. (2000). Negotiating the therapeutic alliance: A relational treatment guide. Guilford. Shelton, J. L., & Ackerman, J. M. (1974). Homework in counseling and psychotherapy: Examples of systematic assignments for therapeutic use by mental health professionals. Thomas. Shelton, J. L., & Levy, R. L. (1981). A survey of the reported use of assigned homework activities in contemporary behavior therapy literature. Behavior Therapist, 4(4), 13–14. Sijercic, I., Button, M. L., Westra, H. A., & Hara, K. M. (2016). The interpersonal context of client motivational language in cognitive-behavioral therapy. Psychotherapy, 53(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000017 Stewart, S., & Schröder, T. (2015). Emotional homework: A systematic literature review of patients’ intersession experiences. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 25(3), 236–252. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039639 Stricker, G. (2006). Using homework in psychodynamic psychotherapy. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 16(2), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/1053-0479.16.2.219 Strunk, D. R. (2022). Homework. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 29(3), 560–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2022.02.009 Valen, J., Ryum, T., Svartberg, M., Stiles, T. C., & McCullough, L. (2011). The achievement of therapeutic objectives scale: Interrater reliability and sensitivity to change in short-term dynamic psychotherapy and cognitive therapy. Psychological Assessment, 23(4), 848–855. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023649 Wachtel, P. L. (1977). Psychoanalysis and behavior therapy. Basic Books. Warwar, S. H., & Ellison, J. (2019). Emotion coaching in action: Experiential teaching, homework, and consolidating change. In L. S. Greenberg & R. N. Goldman (Eds.), Clinical handbook of emotion-focused therapy (pp. 261-289). American Psychological Association. Weck, F., Richtberg, S., Esch, S., Höfling, V., & Stangier, U. (2013). The relationship between therapist competence and homework compliance in maintenance cognitive therapy for recurrent depression: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Behavior Therapy, 44(1), 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2012.09.004 A Transtheoretical Perspective on Between-Session Homework 16 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2024, Vol. 6(Special Issue), Article e12607 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.12607 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2009.10.005 https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036570 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-021-10268-8 https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000017 https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039639 https://doi.org/10.1037/1053-0479.16.2.219 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2022.02.009 https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023649 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2012.09.004 https://www.psychopen.eu/ Wheaton, M. G., & Chen, S. R. (2021). Homework completion in treating obsessive-compulsive disorder with exposure and ritual prevention: A review of the empirical literature. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 45(2), 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-020-10125-0 Yew, R. Y., Dobson, K. S., Zyphur, M., & Kazantzis, N. (2021). Mediators and moderators of homework–outcome relations in CBT for depression: A study of engagement, therapist skill, and client factors. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 45(2), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-019-10059-2 Zeeck, A., & Hartmann, A. (2005). Relating therapeutic process to outcome: Are there predictors for the short-term course in anorexic patients? European Eating Disorders Review, 13(4), 245–254. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.646 Clinical Psychology in Europe (CPE) is the official journal of the European Association of Clinical Psychology and Psychological Treatment (EACLIPT). PsychOpen GOLD is a publishing service by Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID), Germany. Ryum & Kazantzis 17 Clinical Psychology in Europe 2024, Vol. 6(Special Issue), Article e12607 https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.12607 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-020-10125-0 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-019-10059-2 https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.646 https://www.psychopen.eu/ A Transtheoretical Perspective on Between-Session Homework A Brief Historical Overview of Between-Session Homework (BSH) Between-Session Homework: An Integrative Perspective Empirical Research on the Relations Between BSH and Outcome Clinical Practice and Training Clinical Practice Clinical Training Conclusions (Additional Information) Funding Acknowledgments Competing Interests References