id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
ct-9425	Hanson, Rachel ; Reddick, Sadie; Thuerauf, Sabrina; Webb, Katie; Kasimanickam, Vanmathy; Kasimanickam, Ramanathan	Comparison of bull sperm morphology evaluation methods under field conditions	2023	9	.pdf	application/pdf	5919	301	43	Although sperm morphology is an important parameter to identify subfertile from fertile bulls, the evaluation can be biased because sperm staining methods used under field conditions may not be exact due to various factors, including artifacts. Furthermore, dyes used have differing pH and osmolarity, and lengthy procedures may affect sperm shape and size, and thus the outcome of the sperm morphological evaluation.28–30 A study17 compared bull sperm morphology evaluated by brightfield microscopy of eosin-nigrosin stained dry-mount semen smears and differential interference phase contrast microscopy of wet-mounted semen, both at 1,000× magnifi- cation.	cache/ct-9425.pdf	txt/ct-9425.txt