College and Research Libraries


The College Library: 

New Demands and New Approaches 

J 1 THESE VERY RECENT YEARS, there is an 
insistent and importunate throbbing in 
the life of the college library. There was, 
of course, a sustaining flow beneath the 
library portals between the World Wars, 
but now that leisurely meandering stream 
is quickened and focused by stimulants 
stronger and more lasting than those 
prophylactics for tired blood. There is 
actually developing in the college com-
munity an attitude toward the college 
librarians which is akin to the concept of 
librarians and teachers held by the gen-
eral public in the ninteenth century. 

The last half of that century was a par-
ticularly good time for libraries and 
librarians; only the sky was the limit. 
The public library movement was surg-
ing forward in a great ground swell, and 
access to more and more books was be-
lieved to be the sole answer to the model 
republic's concept of equal opportunity 
and true democracy for each and all. It 
was found , however, that books in gen-
erous quantities are not the great "equal-
izers." But books do open the gates of 
horn described by Plato, where true 
dreams issue. And we now appreciate the 
fact that the individual is curtailed b y 
his own limitations of personality, adapt-
ability, and mental capacity. 

The librarians, too, were giants in 
those days: Antonio Panizzi, Bulkley 
Bandinel, Eduoard Edwards, and Rich-
ard Garnett in England; Joseph Green 

NOVEMBER 1963 

BY WYMAN W. PARKER 

Mr. Parker is Librarian of Wesleyan Uni-
versity. This paper was read to the meeting 
of the College Libraries Section of ACRL at 
Beloit College ) july 20) 1963. 

Cogswell, Ainsworth R. Spofford, Wil-
liam Frederick Poole, and Charles C. 
Jewett in the United States-all men of 
vision and action, builders of great col-
lections and moulders of concepts to 
which we today have frequent occasion 
to pay homage. They felt some of the 
limitations we do-but those were the 
physical ones and not the psychological 
ones we also contend with: for them it 
was time, space, and money. They never 
had enough money for books, buildings, 
or staff, nor were their communications 
good enough to acquire satisfying num-
bers of books on the continent in spite 
of their occasional trips there. On the 
other hand, in those days that enthusi-
astic American bookseller Henry Stevens 
of Vermont told Jared Sparks he thought 
"that 1,000 volumes of good American 
books in Austria would be equal to half 
a dozen Presbyterian missionaries and 
two steam enginesl" 1 Then American 
librarians bewailed the lack of book 
material in Ameri~a, yet they managed 
over the years to amass good basic col-

1 Herbert Baxter Adams, The Life and Writings vf 
Jared Sparks (2 vols., Bo ston : Houghton Mifflin Co., 
1893), II, 522 n. 

459 



lections through careful and persistent 
purchase and the judicious use of ex-
change programs such as that at the 
Smithsonian, which later became an in-
ternational agreement. 

We have found in this century that 
books and buildings are not enough-
for example, look at the hundreds of 
Carnegie small-town libraries which re-
main like those gruesome vaults in cem-
eteries-Open for deposit only. What was 
needed as well as books and buildings 
was a spirit of inquiry and a lust for 
learning which is a highly infectious 
virus passed by contact with a provoca-
tive and exciting teacher who is passion-
ately committed to the search for truth 
and the transmission of this love of life 
through learning. 

This new exciting climate of oppor-
tunity seems in large part due to the 
enormous breakthrough in science-
knowledge of recognizable frontiers- in 
space, in the body, in the mind-which 
may be conquered. The race with Russia 
for the moon has accelerated our entire 
educational program and has touched off 
a beneficial investigation of the curricu-
lum and methods of teaching and learn-
ing. There is now a curiosity about the 
physical world akin to that of Elizabethan 
England which will bring in great under-
standing of the world and the body-
the macrocosm and the microcosm. 

We all feel it; students and faculty 
alike come to the library with urgent 
problems. There is a new respect for our 
profession, although we have yet to com-
pete with the Peace Corps for recruits. 
There is even a possibility that the library 
could be the heart of the campus; at 
least maybe the library can contain and 
care for the heart, which, of course, is 
a true symbol of those great books we 
do own. Even an ALA conference gives 
evidence of preoccupation with those 
problems with its Conference Within a 
Conference. When before has this con-
cerned the whole profession? Perhaps 

college librarians muffed the ball and 
the profession as a whole has picked it 
up? Anyway, it is preferable to consider 
this a problem needing the sympathetic 
attention of all librarians representing 
the entire book resources of the nation. 

The fact is that we all have more and 
better students than ever before. They 
are bursting with energy and enthusiasm 
- and, alack, their horizons are bound-
less. This, of course, is good as far as 
their ideas go but it forces the librarians 
to attempt to satisfy limitless interests. 
There is now more advanced work in the 
colleges than ever before. Our faculty 
members demand more effort and expect 
a higher standard of performance than 
previously. Honors work or the individ-
ual project is in evidence on every cam-
pus and is increasing constantly. In truth, 
the undergraduate curriculum has be-
come so a.ccelerated that in many instan-
ces a fine student goes to graduate school 
from college knowing well the tools of 
research while the superior scholar may 
even gain an AB having had the equiva-
lent of a first year of graduate study. 

Each of us can testify, too, that fac-
ulties have become more demanding in 
the library. We know professors expect 
more of their students, and we are grati-
fied that they expect more of the library. 
They want more materials, more refer-
ence services, and more and better all-
round library services. They expect more 
specialized knowledge of reference mate-
rials and bibliographies; they also ex-
pect personal introductions to librarians 
responsible for great concentrations of 
materials. Their work, too, has become 
more exacting; young instructors have 
more complicated PhD topics and the 
established scholar's research is ever 
more specialized. 

Librarians now feel a greater impor-
tance at budget time- at least one has to 
entertain the insistent requests of numer-
ous department heads for additional book 
funds . Deans and provosts are now more 

460 COLLEGE AND RESEARCH LIBRARIES 



interested in the details of library statis-
tics in their continuing course of a series 
of applications for research money, Ford 
funds, National Science Foundation 
grants, or just plain government money 
for buildings and scholarships. And it 
is a wise librarian that then and there 
makes clear to the dean that five per cent 
is the accepted figure which should be 
earmarked from such funds to take care 
of the use by grantees of books and 
building. Yes, Mark Hopkins' log is in-
deed hollow, but happily it is stuffed 
with books and newspapers on film. 

Now the college library has its limita-
tions. In addition to budget restrictions, 
the stacks can usually hold only several 
thousand titles. In spite of the new in-
structor who expects the library to have 
nearly the holdings of his graduate in-
stitution-in his field only, of course-
we ought to be glad there is a limit to 
the collection. After all, the college's 
chief claim to its status is that it is selec-
tive. The college curriculum gives the 
student a limited choice of courses in 
those disciplines which the college phi-
losophy holds essential for a fine educa-
tion. Thus the college library presents 
on its shelves, more or less consciously, 
those books which we believe most sig-
nificant for use in this learning pro-
cedure. We should be as proud of our 
selection of books as the faculty is of its 
tight curricul urn. Certainly the standards 
ought to be commensurate and numbers 
are not always a virtue. 

Variety and range, however, are essen-
tial, for we want students to have the 
same opportunity to choose among quan-
tities of books as they must have to con-
sider various ideas. Their decision is im-
portant only as it strengthens the process 
of discrimination between the good and 

· the bad, the true and the false, satisfac-
tion and restlessness, virtue and dis-
honor, wisdom as preferable to just 
knowledge. We want students to learn the 
process of choice which they may subse-

NOVEMBER 1963 

quently apply to business and profession. 
Surely lawyers, for example, cannot 
learn all the details of every business 
they may have to represent. But they 
know the techniques to acquire enough 
facts upon which to bring the legal proc-
ess to bear. 

There are certain accepted aids and 
axioms for selectivity with which most 
of us are acquainted. For example, in 
buying books one £ollows the curriculum 
and selects in accordance with strengths 
and interests of departments. If your col-
lege offers no courses in home economics 
you need only the standard text on nutri-
tion and The joy of Cooking and pos-
sibly Casserole Cookery. Paperbacks have 
eased some of the burdens of librarians 
while enriching students with ready texts 
and, we hope, a pride of ownership. At 
least the frustrations of the reserve col-
lection have been lifted in many areas, 
particularly for the literature courses, 
where selection of required texts is def-
initely based upon paperback availabil-
ity. When book funds are allocated to 
departments it is helpful to have each 
department's book buying authorized 
(or centralized) by one designated rep-

resentative. Many departments will con-
sider their policies of library purchasing 
at staff meetings at the beginning of the 
academic year and review annually their 
periodical list for deletions, additions, 
and back file investments. 

The college librarians are responsible 
for the full utilization of the campus book 
collection. In addition to sitting on one's 
hands and waiting for the public to call 
for a specific title, there are things that 
librarians can do to make the collection 
known. Good librarians not only know 
their collections well but they also know 
the faculty and what to call to the atten-
tion of various professors (such as books 
received as gifts; books purchased; un-
cataloged books in the attic; and books 
being published which should be pur-
chased by the department). They know 

461 



what projects students are working on, 
and they help them construct bibliogra-
phies. It is important, for example, that 
the library receive early notice from the 
honors college (or any similar project 
on campus) of the assignment of indi-
vidual thesis topics so that appointments 
can be made by the reference staff to 
discuss them with the students. 

Instruction in the use of the library 
(for freshmen and new faculty), tours of 
the building and its services, talks before 
specific classes, and just leading a stu-
dent to concentrations of books in his 
area of interest-all these count in 
spreading the word about the library. 
News of books can be disseminated in 
various ways; for example through lists 
of new accessions, special bulletins, li-
brary publications, college news articles, 
and by sight of the book itself-on a des-
ignated new-book shelf, displays on tables 
and in odd corners, major exhibits, minor 
exhibits, and even by sending the book 
through the campus mail to a likely and 
responsible professor. In this regard, the 
Dartmouth College Library Bulletin 
since its revival in 1957 has done out-
standing work in pointing out good col-
lections of material within the library 
that might be exploited for fruitful re-
search. Books and Libraries at Kansas 
treats of larger concentrations of mate-
rial there, and the recently discontinued 
Johns Hopkins Economic Library Se-
lections gave fine guidance in an impor-
tant field. 

Finally, there is the problem of trying 
to secure enough in the way of materials 
for student honors work and faculty re-
search, which always appears to be more 
wide-reaching than the present collec-
tion. There comes a time when the top-
ics assigned do not make any sense in 
terms of one's collection and one's col-
lecting policy. Here is where self-restraint 
is called for, by librarian and professor 
alike. It is not easy to call off a particular 
thesis topic but it surely makes sense if 

none of the student's material can be 
located on campus. One must be sure, 
however, that every reasonable effort to 
satisfy a logical demand is made before 
declaring an impasse . The answer to a 
professor's insistence is "no funds." If 
he can get the additional funds-and if 
the purchase makes some sense in the 
planned development of an area-then 
everyone is ahead. It is increasingly pos-
sible to obtain such research funds from 
a wide variety of small foundations and 
individual donors, but) new areas can-
not be opened for course offerings with-
out special underwriting for adequate 
library coverage . No one really expects 
the already strained library book budget 
gladly to envelope the kind of incubus 
dreamed up by some overly-enthusiastic 
professor busily riding the specialties 
of his subject. The faculty can appreci-
ate a conservative administration's not 
giving early financial support in such 
cases. 

Several new factors have entered the 
picture to ease the accessibility of library 
materials. Some old techniques have be-
come newly prominent when adapted to 
research work. Photolithography has re-
cently been applied to the reproduction 
of back files of periodicals as well as to 
the duplication of library catalogs. Thus 
we are finally going to get the entire 
British Museum Catalog as used in 
Panizzi's famous circular reading room, 
and fabulously difficult-to-obtain issues 
of periodicals and sets are now available 
for just plain money, such as the Trans-
actions of the Royal Society of London 
from Vol. I (1655) and the Litemturnoe 
Nasledstvo of Moscow from Vol. I 
(1931). 

Microtext has at last become a sub-
stantial part of the research portion of 
libraries. Recent dissertations are avail-
able on microfilm for a price through a 
deposit of master films in Ann Arbor. 
(As an aside, let us not forget that tre-
mendous archive of half a million Ger-

462 COLLEGE AND RESEARCH LIBRARIES 



man dissertations at MILC.) Such great 
ventures as the Evans titles (all books 
printed in or about America up through 
1800) and the nineteenth-century British 
Session Papers are available, on Readex 
cards. Even greater concepts are definitely 
projected such as the STC and Wing 
catalog titles (all books printed in Eng-
lish and in England up through 1700). 
It is likely the whole document produc-
tion of a foreign government or all the 
periodicals of an entire language may be 
at hand well before the last quarter of 
this century. These ingenious cards and 
films can easily b e mailed, transported, 
borrowed, loaned, burned, or torn with-
out undue concern, for replacements can 
be secured from master copy in the pub-
lisher's vaults. 

The securing of articles in periodicals 
not held on campus has been expedited 
by the sale of photocopies, and even the 
text of modest-sized books can be ac-
quired in Xerox copy. For a decade cer-
tain periodicals have been unavailable 
on interlibrary loan, and it is only a 
question of time before no periodical 
will be available on loan . By use of such 
camera and contact copy we can easily 
fill in missing pages, volumes, years, and 
sets for comparatively modest costs. This 
will have a tendency to tighten our col-
lections, making them more complete in 
some areas, and prompt us to throw out, 
sell, or swap unrelated fragments. Thus 
the book collection can be tuned-in, and 
toned-up to present an entity and not a 
magpie gathering. 

College librarians can do each other 
good service by the exchange of informa-
tion on technical and mechanical advan-
ces which can be of positive use in the 
library. These are areas now being ex-
ploited, knowledge of which can be help-
ful to the librarian in his task of acting 
as a clearinghouse of information for the 
campus. The electronic storage and re-
trieval of library material has been con-

NOVEMBER 1963 

fined to remote-from-campus activity such 
as the great government research agen-
cies. But now, with the American Society 
of Metals literature being processed at 
Western Reserve University's Center for 
Documentation and Communications Re-
search, it all comes considerably closer. 
If one knows of the existence of such aids 
in his field, he can be ingenious about 
securing access to them. 

Cooperation is not new to librarians 
but there is now a new importance and 
urgency for the joint use of materials. 
MILC and HILC have shown that there 
are ways for both large and small institu-
tions to gain from common access to val-
uable materials. And ways-unconven-
tional, perhaps, but workable, which is 
more valid-can be found if librarians 
want to cooperate and can be construc-
tive about it. Combined lists of period-
ical holdings for an area, exchange of in-
formation about unwanted or unused 
material, publicity about great strengths 
in definite fields, liberality in loan priv-
ileges for students of neighboring insti-
tutions-all are things in the air-and 
all have the virtue of expanding one's 
holdings and services to help meet the 
larger demands. Cooperative storage of 
books and films, cooperative purchase of 
books and films, and the cooperative use 
of these and other resources of the area, 
can all be possible given the will to work 
it out. 

The twentieth century frontier in the 
academic library world may be .the li-
brarian. They-we have been wonder-
fully cooperative in the past with 'inter-
library loan, and in building up the 
home collection. Now to extend the ser-
vices and resources of the college library, 
ingenuity and the will-to-cooperate must 
be employed. Money and mechanical 
contrivances can only go so far-there-
after it must be a mutual sharing in the 
use of the truly great resources in the 
United States. • • 

463