reviews


 

Book Reviews 75 

oversight has to do with their failure to ex­
amine the legal distinction between “best 
effort” and “reasonable effort.” The former 
commits a library to meeting certain re­
quirements regardless of financial consid­
erations, whereas the latter may be am­
biguous as the authors claim but thus has 
the advantage of not having a strict legal 
definition with major budgetary implica­
tions.

 The appendices are especially useful. 
Appendix A is a list of questions that 
should be asked about every license 
agreement. Are the parties correctly iden­
tified? Are authorized users identified 
appropriately? Are fair use and copyright 
privileges intact? And so forth. Consid­
ered without the analyses offered in the 
book, the answers to these questions will 
not by themselves guide someone as to 
how to respond to the proposed terms. 
But armed with the knowledge gained in 
the first four chapters, the checklist en­
sures a thorough review of the most sa­
lient issues involved in a license agree­
ment. Appendix B provides excerpts from 
the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 
1998 that apply to libraries and archives, 
and Appendix C offers a philosophical 
view: the International Coalition of Li­
brary Consortia’s “Statement of Current 
Perspective and Preferred Practices for 
the Selection and Purchase of Electronic 
Information.”

 Readers of this book will not be pre­
pared to understand every possible clause 
that might be found in a license agree-
ment—this is not the authors’ intention. 
But they will achieve the authors’ three 
goals as stated above. The book brings 
together the most relevant information, 
and organizes and explains it very well. 
The price seems a bit stiff for a slim pa­
perback, but it is a great place for a nov­
ice to begin navigating through the licens­
ing thickets.—W. Bede Mitchell, Georgia 
Southern University. 

Crawford, Walt. Being Analog: Creating 
Tomorrow’s Libraries. Chicago: ALA, 
1999. 245p. $35 (ISBN 0838907547). LC 
98-40764.

 Walt Crawford works at The Research 
Libraries Group Inc., and has published 
numerous books and articles on libraries, 
technology, and personal computing. Be­
ing Analog is an excellent addition to this 
corpus. In this book, Crawford continues 
his examination of favorite themes, in­
cluding the future library, the role tech­
nology will play in that future, and why 
we will still need to be aware of our pa­
trons’ needs, both analog and digital. The 
book is arranged in four sections: Being 
Analog, Libraries and Librarians, Re­
sources and Users, and Creating 
Tomorrow’s Libraries. Each chapter in the 
book is designed to make library profes­
sionals think about libraries, the types of 
materials libraries house, and how the 
materials affect the ways we serve our 
patrons. 

Crawford critically examines the as­
sumption that, in the future, all print 
media will be replaced by digital prod­
ucts. (He points to the current growth of 
the print industry as one reason why this 
all-digital future will not happen.) The 
libraries of the future will most likely be 
composed not only of bits, bytes, and data 
streams, but also of a combination of digi­
tal and analog media. Crawford’s words 
of advice to those who see an all-digital 
future as the end of librarianship are: 
“Calm Down. Plan your future. The revo­
lution has either been postponed or aban­
doned.” It is important to point out that 
Crawford is not antitechnology but, 
rather, believes that technology as well as 
many other types of media will have their 
place in the library of the future. 

A key player in the library of the fu­
ture, as in the past, will be the user. As 
Crawford puts it: “Tomorrow’s librarians 
must continue to pay attention to the most 
important aspect of library service: 
people.” Without the user, there would 
be no reason for the library’s continued 
existence. And users are unique individu­
als who have different needs and differ­
ent preferences. 

Crawford wants us to be aware that the 
library of the future is a complex and in­
tricate place. Now more than ever before, 



76 College & Research Libraries 

we are building libraries that allow pa­
trons access to a mixture of analog and 
digital materials, both on- and off-site. 
And as more universities and colleges 
become involved in distance education, 
their libraries will need to provide even 
more services to remote users. Crawford 
predicts that the provision of library ser­
vices to remote users will increasingly 
rely on partnerships with other academic 
and public libraries. 

Remote services are not limited to the 
academic world; the public library, which 
already takes its collections to patrons via 
the bookmobile and answers scores of 
daily reference questions over the phone 
and through e-mail, also is developing 
new online services for remote users. The 
public library will continue to play a ma­
jor role in the future; it will be a place 
where people can have access to a wide 
range of materials, from mystery novels 
to online resources. Moreover, the public 
library of the future will continue to be a 
place where new readers are developed 
through activities such as story hour. 

What is the role of librarianship in the 
future? According to Crawford, “Real 
librarianship isn’t about catch phrases 
and paradigm shifts. Real librarianship 
applies consistent professional philoso­
phies and continuously evolving skill sets 
to the increasingly complex landscape of 
tomorrow’s libraries and library-related 
needs.” For libraries to provide the high 
quality of service users have grown to 
expect, librarians must become lifelong 
learners and develop an understanding 
of the increasingly complex nature of in­
formation resources. By understanding 
how the complex mix of resources work 
together, we will be able to communicate 
with our users and guide them to the re­
sources, digital or analog, that best serve 
their needs. Crawford writes: “Libraries 
serve people. Libraries will prosper in the 
future by serving people’s diverse inter­
ests and needs, not by asserting that li­
brarians know what people should want 
and how they should acquire informa­
tion, knowledge, and recreation. People 
require a mix of analog and digital re-

January 2000 

sources to serve their preferences and 
abilities; libraries should honor those re­
quirements.” 

Walt Crawford’s vision is of a more 
complex library in which librarians give 
higher priority to learning about, under­
standing, and assessing media of all 
types. Even if readers do not agree with 
everything Crawford has to say in this 
book, it will give librarians and informa­
tion professionals a great deal to think 
and talk about as the future becomes the 
present.—Timothy F. Daniels, University of 
North Carolina at Asheville. 

Informationsversorgung “Politik und 
Strategie”/Information Provision-Politics 
and Strategy: Proceedings of the Interna­
tional Seminar 1999. Wurzburg: 
Akademy Frankenwarte/Deutsches 
Bibliotheksinstitut, 1998. 445p. 

Seldom considered in the deliberations of 
librarians in the United States are the dif­
ficulties encountered by our colleagues 
around the world in our common effort 
to provide information through libraries. 
Whether the clientele are specialized by 
profession or interest, or not specialized 
at all, each library must overcome ob­
stacles caused by infrastructure, funding, 
administrative disinterest, and many 
other factors. This review concerns the 
published proceedings of an institute that 
pulls together the experiences of librar­
ians in East Asia; Russia; Central, South­
ern, Northern, and Eastern Europe; Great 
Britain; as well as one from the U.S. The 
twenty-six papers presented here may be 
eye-opening to complacent librarians 
with comparatively well-supported pro­
grams in place. Each paper is published 
in both English and German versions, and 
each describes an institution-specific 
project or a national effort in the library 
context. 

It is impossible to give a fair review of 
this publication without mentioning the 
difficulty of reading the translated texts 
of the papers. Elizabeth Simon, writing 
in the introduction, frankly apologizes for 
the poor translations: “Most authors have 
written in a second language,” meaning