Book Reviews  463

Katie Hindmarch-Watson. Serving a Wired World: London’s Telecommunications Workers and 
the Making of an Information Capital. Oakland: University of California Press, 2020. 288p. 
Hardcover, $29.95 (ISBN 978-0-5203-4473-0).

Serving a Wired World: London’s Telecommunications Workers and the 
Making of an Information Capital is a scholarly work, rather than one 
on professional practice. Library professionals have a vast range 
of reading available to us as information stewards and conduits 
in the 21st century, and we serve ourselves by including historical 
scholarship in the bounty of ideas we consider. This is especially 
true when a scholarly work provides a window into past informa-
tion workers’ regulated and agentive roles in the communications 
systems they were charged to operate. Here, cultural historian Katie 
Hindmarch-Watson explores how embodied labor and categories of 
gender informed the nascent telecommunications industry in 19th-
century London and via networks across Britain. How were these 
telecommunications workforces feminized and controlled through 
administrative processes and how did some groups push against 

these constraints? If these questions resonate for you, read on.
Information workers of today can find value in the book’s historical context and insights 

into information workers of the past. Serving a Wired World explores how telegraph and tele-
phone systems created opportunities for working women, men, and boys, even as administra-
tors worked to control their workforce and shape how it was perceived by the British public. 
Hindmarch-Watson argues that administrative control was focused on building public reliance 
and trust in these new communications networks, particularly as they were tied to trust in 
the state as essential means of government operations.

Hindmarch-Watson begins by contextualizing the use and expectations of these burgeon-
ing telecommunications systems across the metropolis. Telegraphic and, later, telephonic 
systems were built on existing networks, most especially that of Britain’s postal system. Af-
fluent users of telegraphy expected discretion and privacy in their communications, akin to 
what they expected from the post. Telegraph operators and messengers were trained to be 
efficient and invisible as they mediated these networks of correspondence. Administrators 
used policies and practices that amounted to what Hindmarch-Watson calls a “weaponizing 
of respectability” as telegraph workers sought to prove the intellectual and economic value 
of their labor. Interestingly, Hindmarch-Watson shows how, as telephone systems emerged, 
the established telegraph became the method the public associated with discretion and as-
surances of privacy.

Central to Hindmarch-Watson’s argument is the role gender divisions played in admin-
istrative decision making. Telegraph operators—especially women—and administrators were 
often at odds in their perceptions of the nature of operator labor: Were telegraph operators 
speedy hands or thoughtful connectors? By categorizing telegraph women as physical labor-
ers, administrators were able to keep salaries low. Gender divides meant that male workers 
had paths forward to supervision and higher rank in ways that their female colleagues did 
not. Fomenting these divisions helped administrators to limit unionization efforts and the 
number of permanent, pensioned state positions. Likewise, administrators attempted repeat-
edly to halt telegraph messenger boys’ rises through the ranks into a unionized adult male 



464  College & Research Libraries May 2021

workforce. This gender divide continued in telephone operations, turning attention from the 
speedy hands to the tactful voices of the predominantly female operators.

Sexual exploits and misconduct emerge in Hindmarch-Watson’s chapters on telegraph 
boy messengers. London’s telegraph boys were ubiquitous and anonymous, both seen and 
unseen, as they delivered messages across the metropolis. Sexual scandals involving telegraph 
boys and established men across the capital led administrators to tighten controls and expec-
tations for these young workers. Their dress and comportment were topics of great concern 
and reform for administrators, who attempted to mold them through fitness regimes. Indeed, 
administrators controlled their paths to permanent government positions as adults by requir-
ing military service along the way. These boys in uniform represented the telecommunications 
systems for which they worked and sexual scandals fed into administrative anxieties about 
respectability, of the workers and of the system itself.

Just as telecommunications infrastructures were symbols of empire, so too were they 
targets for rebellion. In the epilogue, Hindmarch-Watson provides examples of how break-
ing telecommunications circuits and attempts to wrest control of central offices were tactics 
employed by groups such as suffragists, Irish nationals, and labor organizers. Telecommunica-
tions infrastructures supported London’s growth and the activities of the British Empire itself 
in broadening communications networks and controls. They also enabled communications 
between rebel groups and proved ready targets for disruption. Hindmarch-Watson shares 
evidence of telecommunications workers both fomenting and undermining these defiant acts.

Serving a Wired World juxtaposes in colorful ways the varied tensions of the period: be-
tween administrators and workers, privacy and mediation, female and male employees, good 
boys and bad ones, order and rebellion. How did people of the era perceive new technolo-
gies like telegraphy? How did this new system make space for a workforce that included 
not only men, but women and boys in its ranks? How did administrators take advantage 
of a feminized workforce, positioning some laborers against others and keeping salaries in 
check? Hindmarch-Watson takes us on a tour of these entangled questions in the context 
of 19th-century London telecommunications. Today’s information workers may recognize 
some of these tensions, particularly in how library labor is both integral and invisibilized in 
library operations and how administrative decisions inform public discourse on the labor of 
information.—Shannon K. Supple, Smith College

Meggan Press. Get the Job: Academic Library Hiring for the New Librarian. Chicago, IL: Associa-
tion of College and Research Libraries, 2020. 158p. Paper, $44.00 (ISBN 978-0-8389-4840-8).

In Get the Job: Academic Library Hiring for the New Librarian, Meggan 
Press, the Undergraduate Education Librarian at Indiana University–
Bloomington, has prepared a guidebook to the hiring process of the 
“strange and wonderful beast” (1) called academia. This slim volume 
covers everything from tips for deciding whether graduate school in 
library science is right for you to dealing with imposter syndrome as 
a new academic librarian. In between, Press, part Dante’s Virgil and 
part Emily Post, both demystifies the peculiar traditions and rules that 
govern the academic job search and instructs readers in the etiquette 
that the system expects.

The book’s chapters fall naturally into four sections (though