id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
crl-25811	Hartman-Caverly, Sarah; Chisholm, Alexandria; Glenn, Alexandrea	Digital Shred: Case Study of a Remote Privacy Literacy Collaboration	2023	22	.pdf	application/pdf	8911	307	22	Rotman proposes a privacy literacy framework as a complementary literacy to digital literacy.7 Rotman’s privacy literacy framework for online interactions in- cludes five elements: understanding the characteristics of information, recognizing online social interactions as potential privacy threats, realizing the possible outcomes of online information disclosure, evaluating privacy threats in a given online interaction, and deciding on how and when to disclose information online.8 Wissinger demonstrates alignment between Rotman’s privacy literacy framework and critical thinking definitions to further inform privacy literacy instruction.9 Lowe argues that privacy and online security should be included in information literacy instruction, and Tewell advocates the inclusion of privacy in critical information literacy learning experiences.10 Wharton notes that privacy literacy can be delivered in conjunction with digital literacy and digital citizenship programming, and provides examples of digital privacy educational offerings from academic libraries.11 Wittek suggests specific privacy literacy instruction topics, including demonstrating alternative search engines, browser extensions, and temporary email accounts, as well as advising patrons to consider the privacy implica- tions of apps and cloud storage used for research.12 Hartman-Caverly and Chisholm find that data profiling and consumer privacy topics are most commonly featured in privacy literacy instruction, which pays less attention to surveillance and intellectual freedom concerns.13 Proj- ect Information Literacy reports that many students make deliberate decisions with respect to online disclosure and privacy protections, and recommends that students learn about the privacy-related concept of algorithmic justice.14 Hagendorff offers four critiques of common approaches to privacy literacy.15 First, Hagen- dorff observes that unequal access to privacy literacy learning experiences perpetuates the disparate impact of surveillance and profiling on members of vulnerable and marginalized groups. Anonymous formative assessment feedback suggests that participants are motivated by the personalized learning activities and value this theory-informed approach to privacy literacy.	cache/crl-25811.pdf	txt/crl-25811.txt