ACRL News Issue (B) of College & Research Libraries


67

From Inside the DLSEF
By D r. K a t h a r i n e  M. S t o k e s

C o lleg e a n d  University L ib rary  Specialist, L i ­
brary Planning a n d  D ev elo p m en t B ranch, D i­
vision o f  L ib rary  S ervices and E du cation al 
Facilities, U.S. O ffice o f  E du cation , W ashin g­
ton, D.C. 20202.

A compilation of the statistics of the 1967 
grants awarded under the Higher Education 
Act of 1965, Title II-A , revealed the following 
proportions of the $25 million appropriation 
going to three categories of libraries: junior 
colleges with an enrollment of 901,290 full­
time equivalent ( F T E )  students, 17.4 per cent 
of the total college population, received 20.1 
per cent; four-year colleges with an F T E  en­
rollment of 1,958,298 or 37.9 per cent of the 
total college population, received 44.5 per cent; 
and universities with an enrollment of 2,310,050 
F T E  students, 44.7 per cent of the total col­
lege population, received only 35.4 per cent.

The staff of D L S E F ’s Library Training and 
Resources Branch, which is responsible for ad­
ministering the College Resources Program, was 
concerned that the universities had apparently

not received a share of the grants proportionate 
to their enrollments. Although this group ap­
pears to have been slighted, a further analysis 
of the individual grants showed that eight 
universities got almost a third of the $25 million 
appropriation. Three of the eight applied only 
for basic and supplemental grants, but because 
of their large enrollments one was awarded 
over $150,000 as a supplemental grant, and 
the other two each received about $100,000. 
Three other universities were awarded $100,000 
special purpose grants requiring non-federal 
matching money of 33'ś per cent, but with 
their supplemental grants their “free money” 
amounted to $98,890, $97,183 and $92,738 
respectively. Another university with a special 
purpose grant of $75,000, still cleared, with its 
supplemental, somewhat more than $92,000. 
The remaining university received a special 
purpose grant of only $10,296, but its supple­
mental grant brought its total to almost $91,000 
that required no matching.

An examination of the grant applications of a 
selected group of sixty-nine libraries showed 
that twenty-six of them had made no request for 
supplemental grants. Several of these twenty-six

7th Collective Index to Chemical Abstracts 1 9 6 2 -1 9 6 6  
Your guide to nearly P u b lic a tio n  of the 7TH C O L L E C T IV E  INDEX began in April, 1967. Subscription 

rates for the complete 28 volume set are as 
follows:

chemical papers 
and patents…

The 7 T H  C O L L E C T IV E  IN D E X  giv e s you 
access to one-fourth of all abstracts ever 
published in CHEM ICAL A BSTRACTS. Vol­
umes 56-65 of CHEM ICAL ABSTRA CTS are 
included. The 10 separate Subject Indexes, 
Formula Indexes, Author Indexes and Patent 
Indexes for these volumes are combined, 
re-edited, and updated into one S u b je c t 
Index, one Formula Index, one Author Index 
and one Numerical Patent Index and Patent 
Concordance. You can focus on your interests 
within this large body of information and see 
5 years of development in your specialty.

Colleges & U niversities*.. $2,000 
All O th e r s .........................  $2,500

Postage: Foreign—$24.00: PUAS & Canada— 
$16.00
*Due to the special rate granted, purchase 
is  made through a lease agreement.

O rder fro m :

A m e r i c a n  C h e m i c a l  S o c i e t y
1 1 5 5  S ix te e n th  S t. N. W. /  W ashington, D.C. 2 0 0 3 6

C H E M IC A L  A B S T R A C T S  SER V IC E
A m e r i c a n  C h e m i c a l  S o c i e t y  

Columbus, Ohio 43216



68

did apply for special purpose grants and a few 
failed to receive them. But they may have 
missed an opportunity to be awarded a sub­
stantial supplemental grant if they had tried 
for whatever points they could earn of the 
ten possible. Only five institutions earned that 
high score of ten points, while most of the 
libraries receiving supplemental grants earned 
them on five points or even less. For any 
institution with a big enrollment, the supple­
mental grant should be a big attraction. ■ ■

C O N N E C T IC U T  N E T W O R K
A Teletype network which interconnects the 

Connecticut State Library, five public librar­
ies, and five academic libraries— Connecticut 
College, Trinity College, University of Con­
necticut (S torrs), Wesleyan University, and 
Yale University was installed initially for the 
purpose of facilitating communications of 
any kind among the libraries on the network. 
It has to no one’s surprise turned out that the 
major use is to effect interloans and provide 
book location service. The network is of the 
class called TW P, which means that calls 
from any of the parties can only be directed 
to another party on the network (or to all 
members of the network).

The major use of the system is by the state

O T T O  H A R R A S S O W IT Z
Lib rary A ge n cy 

W IESBADEN • G ERM A N Y

Direct service 
on all G erm an language 

books and periodicals

•

Orders an d inquiries are invited on 
both new an d out-of-print material

•

F a rm ington Plan agent 
for West and East Germany

•

F o r econom y, speed , an d accuracy 
you may rely u p o n  your

Germ an agent

O TTO  H A R R A S S O W IT Z

library (including replies to its queries), which 
undertakes to locate, usually for interloan, a 
publication desired by a patron of any other 
library in the state and not located in its own 
or the state library’s holdings. In most cases, 
the asking library is one of the two hundred 
or so public libraries not on the network, but 
the service is not limited to public libraries. 
Also, in most cases, the loan is sought from 
one of the five public libraries on the network. 
The academic libraries are called upon by the 
state library only for the more scholarly ma­
terial being sought. Even so, Yale is usually 
called upon only as a last resort, to avoid 
inundating them with requests that might be 
filled elsewhere.

The second heaviest traffic on the network 
is by and among the five academic libraries 
themselves. As Yale, of the five, is the one 
most heavily endowed with library resources, 
it seems probable that it is the greatest con­
tributor of interloans to the other four, but 
it is also a borrower from these. Recognizing 
Yale’s importance in this scheme, the five 
academic libraries have jointly financed the 
salary of a librarian who is stationed at Yale 
and given custody of Yale’s part in the Tele­
type network.

The remaining, and least heavy, traffic on 
the network is by and among the five public 
libraries. These use the network to seek inter­
loans from one another and from the state 
library. Bequests they may wish routed to the 
academic libraries are, by agreement, channeled 
through the state library.

Cost of the Teletype facility is borne by 
the state library using LSCA Title I  funds. 
During the development phase of the network 
(which has now been in service nearly one 
and a half years), all other costs have been 
borne by the member libraries on the network. 
This capability has been used to some extent 
for inter-communications between the Con­
necticut library Teletype network and those 
in Rhode Island and Vermont, as well as to 
and from specific libraries both within and 
outside of Connecticut. However, full use 
of the potential of interstate traffic is yet to 
be developed.—C harles E. Funk‚ Jr., Supervisor, 
Department of Planning, Evaluation & R e­
search, Connecticut State Library. ■ ■

TA LEN T!
Credit for the Membership Promotion ads 

which have appeared in the C R L  N ew s issues 
since December, goes to Frances Kennedy, 
librarian of Oklahoma City University and 
A CBL Representative on the ALA Member­
ship Committee. The series will continue 
through the May issue.