ACRL News Issue (B) of College & Research Libraries 310 national shared cataloging and interlibrary loan ef­ forts? What might be the effects o f zero funding? Any group or individual interested in sharing additional information or concerns should contact the Chair o f the CLS Impact Committee, John Sheridan, Head Librarian, Transylvania Univer­ sity Library, Lexington, KY 40508; or the Chair o f the C ollege Libraries Section, Thomas G. Kirk, College Librarian, Berea College, Berea, KY 40404.—John Sheridan. ■ ■ The Exchange Experience: An American Perspective Larry W. Griffin Interlibrary Services Indiana University As I have just completed eleven months at the University of Edinburgh Library as an exchange librarian from Indiana University Libraries, a number o f librarians have asked me about my ex­ perience. In this report I will comment on some aspects o f the exchange program that may be use­ ful to other American librarians who are planning a similar experience in a British library. It all began in 1975 when I met Ruth M ei­ ling, British librarian now in Colchester, England, who was an exchange librarian at the Indiana- Purdue University campus at Fort Wayne. When I asked her how I might arrange a similar ex­ change, she explained that certain agencies in­ volved in exchange programs for teáchers would occasionally aid librarians, but their contacts with British libraries were inadequate. She suggested that I find someone in Britain who was interested and pursue it on my own. My plan remained dormant until March, 1980, when I responded to an interlibrary loan inquiry from Margaret Dowling, ILL librarian at Edin­ burgh University Library. For some reason I was inspired to add a postscript that read: “ W ould you be interested in trading jobs for a year? If so, let me know. W e may be able to work something out.” Ms. Dowling very quickly wrote back say­ ing she was interested. From that point it was a matter o f 1) securing from our supervisors ap­ proval in principle, 2) exchanging resumes and in­ formation about our respective positions and li­ braries, and 3) pushing all o f the paperwork for official approval through the bureaucratic process. This, along with negotiations for living accomoda­ tions and personal family matters, took a full year. A single person could easily speed up the process, but m oving my family o f four 4,000 miles required a great deal of logistic planning. Apparently my fishing technique was a stroke of luck, for a colleague o f mine has tried the ap­ proach several times with no result. British li­ brary administrators were often interested, but I met few librarians who were willing to trade jobs. Family concerns and job security were the major reasons for their reluctance. In my case most o f the paperwork was done by us rather than by the university administration. Following an exchange o f resumes and job de­ scriptions the library administrators decided what position could be offered to each exchange per­ son. It was not a direct exchange. At Edinburgh I took over Ms. D ow lin g ’ s position which was changing because o f reorganization. At Indiana my administrative position was filled temporarily with an experienced IU librarian, and Ms. Dowl­ ing was offered a position as a reference librarian in the Undergraduate Library. Each o f us found the arrangement to be exactly what we w ere seeking. For me it was a year in which I got away from the demands o f an administrative position and worked directly with users in reference and ILL. For Ms. Dowling it was an opportunity to broaden her experience by becoming actively in­ volved in library instruction and undergraduate reference service, in contrast to her working primarily with faculty and graduate students at Edinburgh. The librarian at the University o f Edinburgh and the dean o f libraries at Indiana University then agreed in writing to accept each other’s li­ brarians without pay and conform to the working conditions of the host library. Earlier it had been decided that the best way to arrange the ex­ change was for each o f us to continue to be paid by the home institution and be sent “ on assign­ ment” to the host library. Any other arrangement would have required Edinburgh to provide con­ siderable justification for a work permit for me, and it is very likely that it w ould have been denied— proving that I was more qualified for a reference and ILL position than 3 million unem­ ployed British citizens is not an easy task! At Indiana approval by the dean o f faculties, the vice president for academic affairs, the presi­ dent, and the board o f trustees was necessary. Similar arrangements had already been made for teaching faculty, so that once the dean’ s office found the appropriate procedure, it was a matter of moving the paperwork through the right chan­ nels. 312 One surprise occurred at the immigration desk upon my arrival. I was prepared for questions re­ garding employment in Great Britain and had in hand letters from both universities stating that I was being paid by IU, not a British employer. But I did not expect to have to register as an alien with the local police at a fee of $40! The old maxim, “ Take less luggage and more money,” is the best advice I can give. I went to Edinburgh with 14 years o f experi­ ence in virtually every department of a library except rare book collections, and Ms. Dowling came to Indiana with over 10 years o f varied li­ brary experience. One aid to the transition was that we both had been working in areas that dif­ fered primarily in procedure, not function. Li­ brarians or managers working in specific subject areas, rare books, acquisitions, referen ce, or interlibrary loans will probably not have a long period o f adjustment. Even catalogers may escape being overw helm ed by procedural differences, because a surprising number o f British libraries are using Library o f Congress classification. British libraries are also coping with the same issues as we are— budget cuts, automation, and copyright. The problems are the same but there is a different approach. University library com ­ mittees are given considerable authority and are less advisory in nature. A librarian’ s academic rank is more significant than his or her position. Middle managers function differently than in the U.S. Personnel budgets, not materials budgets, are the sacred cows. The change in perspective is sometimes enlightening and sometimes frustrat­ ing, but the experience is most valuable for both parties to the exchange. As a manager returning to front-line reference work after several years, I was concerned about my ability to cope. I found, however, that al­ though Edinburgh’ s reference collection had a British emphasis, I quickly learned what was where and how to use it. Reference questions re­ garding the university, its organization, and its archival material were the most difficult. Lack o f a subject catalog was the most trouble­ some problem in reference work. I never quite understood the classification scheme (a variation o f Dewey) well enough to use the classed catalog effectively. Catalogers served as subject spe­ cialists, however, and were always available and willing to help. A n oth er reason why I learn ed the jo b so quickly and easily was the friendly, helpful, stable, and experienced staff at Edinburgh Uni­ versity Library. Unlike many American academic libraries where staff turnover is high and within a year one can becom e a senior member o f the de­ partment (as my exchange partner did), most o f the staff at Edinburgh had been in their positions five years or more. Perhaps the most obvious difference I noticed was a less formal, less anxiety-ridden atmosphere than one finds in large libraries in the U.S. The fact that librarians at Edinburgh do not face the rigors o f annual evaluations, salary increments based on performance, and a promotion and ten­ ure process very likely has something to do with the m ore relaxed approach. W orking in both types o f situations has been personally rewarding. The benefits o f this kind o f exchange program depend on the backgrounds, interests, abilities, and positions o f the exchange partners. W e were able to experience one year o f working in a dif­ ferent position in a foreign library without com ­ mitting ourselves to a perm anent m ove (or higher mortgage rate). Exchanges within the United States and abroad seem to be a viable means o f helping librarians to avoid burnout. No matter how much you like your job, ultimately boredom will set in and productivity, initiative, and creativity will decrease. An exchange pro­ vides a needed change, a fresh view, an opportu­ nity to try something different. If nothing else re­ sults from an exchange, you very likely will learn that your own situation is not so bad after all. An exchange for librarians is analogous to the teaching faculty’ s sabbatical. The personal, cul­ tural, and professional benefits o f an exchange comprise an essay in itself and depend considera­ bly on the person. A poor librarian would likely return from an exchange unchanged; a good li­ brarian will benefit immeasurably. If we ever ex­ pect to realize the utopian dream o f international cooperation and resource sharing, what better place to begin than by sharing our librarians? E d itor’s Note: Margaret Dowling will share her version o f the Exchange Experience in the No­ vember C&RL News. ■ ■ Exchange Option Another institution has shown an interest in participating in the ACRL Exchange Librarian Program (see C&RL News, June 1982, p. 205, July/August 1982, p. 241, and S eptem ber 1982, p. 302). The C o lch e s te r In stitu te, Sheepen Road, Colchester, Essex C 0 3 3LL, United K ingdom , is an institute o f higher education much like an American community college. Many o f the students are 18-20 years old. Ruth H. M elling, Institute Librarian, writes: “ W e have an unusually wide range academically, from bricklaying to bachelor’ s degrees in music.” Libraries or librarians interested in par­ ticipating in an exchange should contact the Institute directly. a