ACRL News Issue (B) of College & Research Libraries 303 Continuing Education for Academic Librarians— VII A position, one of several similar positions ad­ vertised, appeared recently in the C h r o n ic le o f H ig h er E ducation . It was for an assistant to the library director to be responsible for business op­ erations of the library. Educational qualifications included courses in statistics, in personnel admin­ istration, and in budgeting, all of which are pre­ sent only to a limited degree in the MLS pro­ gram and often tend to be viewed by the library school student as of secondary importance. The academic library is an administrative unit and requires the same level of efficient manage­ ment as any other unit of the college or univer­ sity. The library manager, to do this, needs the skills of library and information science and of b u siness adm inistration. This com bination of requisite skills does not fit into the traditional one-year M LS program, and the typical library school does not have sufficient courses in busi­ ness administration in its curriculum. A c o o rd in a te program re s u ltin g in a jo in t MLS/MBA degree is one possible solution. The graduate of such a program would have the administrative skills and the information skills nec­ essary to manage an academic library. Libraries have many fine librarians who have administra­ tive responsibilities but who are not able adminis­ trators. Few administrators have a knowledge of and sensitivity to library and information services as they are or should be performed. Many as­ pects of librarianship— acquisition o f materials, contracting for services, union negotiations, in addition to the daily responsibilities for personnel and financial accountability—are administrative. They cannot be performed well without a knowl­ edge on the part of the library manager of both information services and administration. A second alternative in educational programs for schools of library and information science would be to promote courses in business and public administration for students and to provide independen t study and intern ships in library management.—Ann E. P ren tice, D ire c to r o f the S ch ool o f L ib ra r y a n d In fo rm ation S cien ce, Uni­ versity o f T en n essee, Knoxville. ■■ Study o f Academic L ib ra ry Salaries in California T h e C alifornia Postsecondary Education C om m ission issu ed in May a rep ort on a study of academic library salaries in that state. E n title d L i b r a r i a n s ’ C o m p e n s a t io n a t th e U niversity o f C a lifo r n ia a n d th e C a lifo r n ia S tate University a n d C olleges: T he S earch f o r E quity, the report concludes that librarians in th e U n iv ersity o f C a lifo rn ia and in the California State University and colleges are currently being paid at a higher level than li­ brarians in comparable four-year institutions both in California and nationally. However, the report also notes that the salaries still fall behind by as much as 20 percent when com­ pared with salaries for com m unity college librarians in California. The study, conducted in response to legisla­ tive request, states that both the university and state university and colleges systems are in a healthy competitive situation in hiring and retaining librarians due to this salary ad­ vantage and the fact that there is currently a surplus of librarians available in California. (The report was prepared before the passage of Proposition 13 in that state.) The initial response from academic librar­ ians in California to this report has not been favorable. In a special meeting on May 16, the State University and College Librarians Chapter of the California Library Association passed a resolution contending that the meth­ odology o f the report is “superficial, incom­ plete, and capricious, and many of its conclu­ sions found to be illogical and inequitable” and calling upon the commission to withdraw the report so that the issues might “be re­ studied by more co m p eten t analysts.” On June 2 the Assembly of the Librarians Associ­ ation of the University of California (LAUC) also passed a resolution urging withdrawal of the study. Charging that the study is both in­ complete and inaccurate, LAUC states that it cannot be used as the basis for an evaluation of or determination of a salary structure for li­ brarians.