ACRL News Issue (B) of College & Research Libraries


RESEARCH LIBRARIES NEWS
COLLEGE & 

E d u cation  fo r Com m unity 
College L ibrarianship: 
An U pd ate

Ruth J . Person
Assistant Professor

School o f Library &  Information Science
Catholic University o f America

In the past decade, there have been many changes in li­
brary education. Emphasis on new specializations, additions 
of new field experience alternatives, in some cases move­
ment toward a more integrated curriculum, and emphasis 
on a functional rather than type-of-library approach suggest 
but a few of these changes. At the same time, much has 
happened in the field of community and junior college 
librarianship. The 1970s brought continuous growth in the 
number and size of community colleges and their learning 
resources centers. New ALA guidelines and quantitative 
standards for learning resources programs were developed. 
Innovative programs and services in learning resources cen­
ters have continued to grow, suggesting to some that the 
community college and its learning resources center provide 
a model of the future academic institution and its library in 
the use of instructional technology.1

In informal discussions a number of community college li­
brarians have raised questions about the current status of 
education for community college librarianship in light of the 
above-mentioned changes. How has education for librarian- 
ship reflected the changes taking place in the community 
college library? What is the status of community college li­
brarianship within library education programs? How visible 
is community college librarianship as a potential area of spe­
cialization to prospective and current students in library 
education programs?

To answer these questions, a representative of the Com­
munity and Junior College Libraries Section’s Communica­
tions Committee polled the sixty-one ALA-accredited li­
brary schools in the United States through a brief question­
naire mailed to deans and directors at the end of the first 
academic term of 1980. In order to provide some compara­
tive information, questions in the letter were designed to 
elicit similar information to that reported in Fritz Veit’s sur-



270

In this issue:

Education for Community
College Librarianship............269

San Francisco
Conference Highlights ...........271

Highlights of ACRL
Board Meetings ......................275

View from H Q .............................277

ACRL O fficers............................279

ACRL C h ap ters..........................282

Continuing Education:
CE and the Information 
Environment .........................285

Copyright Controversy.............286

News from the F ie ld ..................290

People ........................................294

Publications ...............................304

C alen d ar......................................306

Classified A dvertising................308

vey of 1968.2 Veit reported on information eli­
cited from forty-two schools; fifty schools re­
sponded to the current questions.

In 1968, Veit reported that there were no li­
brary schools offering a course designed specif­
ically for students preparing for community col­
lege librarianship, and that only two schools were 
planning seminars on this topic. In 1980 (keeping 
in mind that some schools have moved away from 
type-of-library approaches), six schools reported 
the availability of such a course. Thirty-six addi­
tional schools offer a course in academic li­
brarianship which covers the community college 
library. At least half of these schools also offer 
courses in specialized areas identified by both 
Edsall3 and Matthews4 as being important for 
study by future community college librarians. 
Such courses would include: “Non-book Mate­
rials,” “Design and Production of Instructional 
Materials,” “Design and Production of Media,” 
“Instructional Technology,” “Instructional Tech­
nology Administration,” “Media and Services for 
Adults,” “Multimedia Practicum,” “Media Cen­
ters: Theoretical Foundations,” “The District- 
Regional Media Center,” and “The Library in the 
C om m unity,” as reported by the responding 
schools. Three schools encourage students to en­
roll in general education courses in “The Com­
munity College”; several have a special practicum 
for community college experience as well. Three 
schools also report special credit-free programs 
related to community college librarianship at the 
master’s or post-master’s level, whereas Veit re­

College & Research Libraries News (ISSN 0099-0086) is 
published by the Association of College and Research Librar­
ies, a division of the American Library Association, as 11 
monthly (combining July-August) issues, at 50 E. Huron St., 
Chicago, IL 60611. Annual subscription: $10, or to members 
of the division, $2.50, included in dues. Single copies and 
back issues, $3.50 each. Second-class postage paid for at 
Chicago, Illinois, and at additional mailing offices.

Editor: George M. Eberhart, ACRL/ ALA, 50 E. Huron St., 
Chicago, IL 60611; (312) 944-6780. President ACRL David C. 
Weber. Executive Director, ACRL Julie Carroll Virgo.

Production and circulation office: 50 E. Huron St., Chicago, 
IL 60611. Display advertising should be sent to Leona Swiech, 
Advertising Traffic C∞rdinator, ALA, at above address. Send 
classified ads to ACRL. Change of address and subscription 
orders should be addressed to College & Research Libraries 
News, for receipt at the above address at least two months be­
fore the publication date of the effective issue.

Inclusion of an article or advertisement in C&RL News does 
not constitute official endorsement by ACRL or ALA.

A partial list of the services indexing or abstracting the con­
tents of C&RL News includes: Current Contents.- Social & Be­
havior Sciences; Current Index to Journals in  Education; In­
formation Science Abstracts; Library & Information Science 
Abstracts; Library Literature; and Social Sciences Citation In­
dex.

To the postmaster: Please send undeliverable copies to 
ACRL, 50 E. Huron St., Chicago, IL 60611.

©Am erican Library Association 1981. All material in this 
journal subject to copyright by the American Library Associa­
tion may be photocopied for the noncommercial purpose of 
scientific or educational advancement.

Video Involvement 
for Libraries
Susan Spaeth Cherry, editor

A compilation and update of the series of 
articles on video that appeared in American 
Libraries between April 1979 and October 
1980, a series designed to explore the edu­
cational and informational possibilities of 
the medium and to show how to use it 
effectively.

Emphasis is placed upon recorders, cable 
TV, videodisc players, and computer-linked 
information, describing what has been done 
successfully with them in school media cen­
ters and in public and academic libraries.
It reports the latest developments in home 
information systems, such as Videotext and 
teletext, gives techniques of camera work, 
and lists the software and services that are 
available for program planners.
84p. ISBN 0-8389-0323-1 (1981) $6.00

Order Department
American Library Association
50 E. Huron Street, Chicago, IL 60611



271

ported only two in 1968.
While it must be noted that, as in Veit’s study, 

the contributions by other educational agencies 
and library schools not on the ALA list were not 
examined, nevertheless the developments in 1980 
indicate some progress in increasing both the 
visibility and the educational opportunities in 
community college librarianship. Even with the 
combination of only modest growth5 and normal 
staff attrition, new community college librarians 
with specialized training, as suggested by Mat­
thews and Edsall, will still be needed. At the 
same time we cannot expect all students to come

1Damon D. Hickey, “The Impact of Instruc­
tional Technology on the Future of Academic Li­
brarianship,” in Academic Libraries by the Year 
2000, ed. by Herbert Poole (New York: Bowker, 
1977), pp. 34-39.

2Fritz Veit, “Training the Junior College Li­
brarian,” Journal o f Education fo r Librarianship 
9 (Fall 1968): 108-115.

3Charles Hale & Shirley Edsall, “The Educa­
tion of Community College Librarians,” Journal 
o f Education fo r  Librarianship 16 (Fall 1975): 75-

to library science programs with a comprehensive 
knowledge of different types of library employ­
ment possibilities. If we wish to continue and/or 
increase the visibility of com m unity college 
librarianship as an option for new entrants to li­
brarianship, then we must turn to a new set of 
questions—“What role should community college 
librarians, either individually or through their 
associations, take in the promotion of their spe­
cialty to future entrants into librarianship?” and 
“How can new partnerships with library educa­
tors be formed so that this visibility and educa­
tional opportunity is insured?”

85.
4Elizabeth W. Matthews, “Update in Educa­

tion for Community College Library Administra­
to rs,” Journal o f Education fo r  Librarianship 
19 (Spring 1979): 304-311.

5See information about enrollment projections 
in community colleges in Nancy B. Dearman & 
Valena W hite Plisko, ed s., The Condition o f 
Education: Statistical Report 1980 (Washington: 
U.S. Department of Education, National Center 
for Educational Statistics, 1980), p. 24.

San F ra n cisco  C on feren ce H ighlights

San Francisco lived up to its reputation as the 
“Air-Conditioned City” by greeting conference- 
goers with beautiful, cool weather. Despite the 
distance from the hotels to the Civic Auditorium, 
librarians kept a busy schedule of meetings, pro­
grams, tours, and informal discussions.

Among the conference events were tours of the 
City College of San Francisco and the Mission 
College LRC, excursions to local wineries, and 
nearly twenty program meetings. The excitement 
of annual conference was enhanced by hundreds 
of excellent San Francisco resta u ran ts, art 
museums, the magic of Chinatown and Fisher­
man’s Wharf, an incredible Gay Freedom Day 
Parade, the clear Pacific air, and the distant 
mountains.

ACRL’s Program Meeting
On June 28 many members attended the mem­

bership meeting and program at the Sheraton- 
Palace Hotel. Penny Abell, 1980-81 ACRL Presi­
dent, launched the program theme of “Scholars 
and Librarians: Partners in Learning and Re­
search” with some introductory observations, ex­
plaining: “During my tenure as ACRL president, 
I have attem pted to concentrate my efforts on 
fostering closer relationships between academic 
librarians, individually and collectively, and their 
counterparts in higher education and research. 
Such interaction is crucial to the provision of 
adequate library and institutional support.”

The theme speaker, Laura A. Bornholdt, vice- 
president for education of the Lilly Endowment, 
spoke on “Shaking the Foundations” and pro­
vided some insight into what it is like to work for 
a foundation. She also suggested some ways in 
which librarians might expand their circle of 
foundation friends in the next ten years.

Afterwards, th ree pairs of librarian/scholar 
panelists reviewed their experiences with funded 
projects. John White, professor of philosophy and 
religion at DePauw University, described the 
ARL/OMS Small Library Development Project 
and remarked that “a good self-study team de­
mands a good deal of trust and willing contribu­
tions on the part of both teaching faculty and li­
brarians.” A bibliographic instruction program for 
chemistry majors at the University of Rochester

D u e s  In c re a s e  
R e fe r e n d u m  Passed

ACRL members voted in favor of increasing 
ACRL divisional dues an additional $10 in the 
July ballot. The final count as of July 30, 
1981, was 1,320 votes for the increase, and 
1,103 against, re p re se n tin g  a 55%-45% 
approval.

The new rates will go into effect with the 
1982 membership year.