September 2015 433 C&RL News

For many libraries, social media is usually another platform to share information 
about library resources and events. For some, 
the term has become overused so much that 
the social aspect has fallen by the wayside. By 
using a Facebook page or Twitter account to 
“say it loud”1 with frequent posts, libraries are 
essentially yelling at their audience, and what 
is social about that? Facebook page updates 
or tweets are only part of what you can bring 
to and achieve from social media. 

In this article we discuss how students 
communicate with our academic library on 
Twitter, and how we used conversations to 
improve library spaces, technology, and ser-
vices. We will explain the process of tracking 
and responding to student tweets, as well 
as the pros and cons of such an endeavor. 
Lastly, we will share our use of Application 
Programming Interface (API) generators and 
provide examples from institutions using this 
technology to communicate with students. 

At the University of Dayton (UD) Librar-
ies, our public services areas use notification 
tools and Twitter’s search feature to observe 
what students write about the library and to 
engage with them on a daily basis. Established 
in 2009, the Roesch Library Twitter account  
(@roeschlibrary) started as a way to announce 
events and services. Beginning in 2010, the 
newly hired communications and outreach 
librarian began tracking tweets that referred to 
the library, organized them in a spreadsheet, 
and began categorizing them. Similar to many 
named buildings, students refer to Roesch 

Library, as Club Roesch, and use a hashtag 
(#clubroesch). #clubroesch is one of our saved 
searches that we check frequently. A term that 
was created by our students, the idea of the 
library as a club appealed to them, especially 
when students are in the library late at night 
or over the weekend. Monitoring Twitter 
chatter provides an opportunity to improve 
services by knowing what students criticize 
(slow Wi-Fi in the building, loud students 
on quiet floors, etc.), and it also informs us 
that the library is viewed as a popular place 
on campus. 

What we have done
The discovery of #clubroesch was exciting 
because it was not only being used often, but 
it was also was the sole label used by student 
culture. Club Roesch highlights what students 
want their peers to see, not necessarily what 
they want the library (or librarian) to see. This 
hashtag allowed students to converse with 
each other, trade Club Roesch anecdotes, and 
comment on their library experiences. The 
tweets tracked were uncensored, funny, and 
informative. Once we started responding to 
the hashtag and library mentions, students 
would often retweet our replies and we would 
gain more followers. It is clear that once we 

Katy Kelly is communications and outreach librarian, 
email: kkelly2@udayton.edu, and Hector Escobar is 
director of education and information delivery, email: 
hescobar1@udayton.edu at University of Dayton
© 2015 Katy Kelly and Hector Escobar

Katy Kelly and Hector Escobar

Bird’s eye view
Using Twitter in #ClubRoesch

ACRL TechConnect



C&RL News September 2015 434

began building a reputation of being respon-
sive, tweets continue to flow in.

Communication about @roeschlibrary has 
painted a clearer picture of how the library 
is used and viewed by students. Tweets have 
included how long students have studied 
in the library for extended periods of time. 
Students are then willing to share where 
they are with everyone (their followers and 
friends), and they are proud to be camping 
out in the library for so long. 

Since students are on social media, we 
also wanted to use it for various promo-
tional events. For National Library Week, 
we hosted a #roeschselfie contest,2 inspired 
by the #selfie trend. People who tweeted 
with that hashtag 
and a photo of 
themselves in the 
library were en-
tered into a draw-
ing for a gift card 
of their choice. 
Our most popu-
lar contest is the 
Club Roesch VIP 
contest,3 which 
we run before ev-
ery finals week 
every semester. 
The prize costs 
the library noth-
ing, aside from 
scheduling a room, and the lucky student 
gets a key to his or her own study room for 
the entire week. Students enter the contest 
by retweeting our original tweet. Similarly, 
we have followers “like” the contest photo 
on Instagram to enter, as well. These con-
tests promote our presence on social media 
and also allow students to engage with us, 
with an incentive for them to participate. 
The contest popularity has grown so much 
that in one semester’s drawing, there were 
more than 100 retweets by students in a 
half-hour period.

In addition to using Twitter to interact 
with students and promote events, UD has 
exploited this service to respond to refer-

ence questions that may have been viewed 
as cumbersome if students had to submit 
their questions from a web form. Students 
began using Twitter to ask directional and 
reference questions. To ensure the respon-
sibility did not fall to just one employee, we 
established a workflow so that service desk 
employees respond to questions during our 
normal hours of operation. This workflow 
also ensures we address questions or con-
cerns in a more timely manner. 

Use of APIs 
The Twitter API and notification tools al-
low institutions to track what students are 
saying about their library. The Twitter API 

pulls in public 
tweets that in-
clude designated 
keywords within 
a specified radius 
of a geolocation. 
For example, at 
Miami University 
in Oxford, Ohio,4 

librarians use the 
T witter API to 
proactively iden-
tify user needs 
a n d  o p i n i o n s , 
w h i c h  f o s t e r s 
word-of- mouth 
marketing. This 

engagement helps build social rapport, find 
the “lost” reference questions, and helps 
focus on listening to users. 

Examples of keywords they use include 
books, course names/numbers, and library. 
Social media management tools such as 
Hootsuite and TweetDeck can also facilitate 
this tracking. Typically, Miami University’s 
librarians see 10 to 15 tweets daily through 
the API, with the numbers increasing during 
finals period. 

APIs generally require some degree of 
programming skills, which may prove to be 
a barrier for librarians interested in learning 
from Twitter interactions. However, newer 
online services allow individuals to create 

Example of @roeschlibrary interacting with one of its fol-
lowers. View this article online for more detailed images.



September 2015 435 C&RL News

API services with no programming back-
ground needed. 

UD uses a free service called Zapier,5 which 
allows you to create if/then relationships that 
interact with social media. For example, with 
Zapier a library can create a geocode to inter-
act with a keyword in Twitter. UD identified 
its GPS coordinates and created an API in 
Zapier. The condition is if the word, library is 
mentioned within a 1.5 mile IP radius of UD, 
the referenced tweet is emailed to an account 
for notification. In addition to searching for 
#clubroesch, our API script allows the library 
to get updates about how students may be 
interacting with the library, which can then 
be analyzed for any trends. 

How can a geocoded keyword search be 
u s e f u l ? 
Let’s as-
sume a 
random 
p e r s o n 
in a two 
mile ra-
dius of 
y o u r 
l i b r a r y 
tweets, 
“There is a person on the third floor of the 
library who appears to be fainting.” If an API 
notification is sent when the word library is 
mentioned, library staff can verify whether 
someone did fall ill. 

Best practices and tools
Twitter now functions as a customer service 
hotline for big brands such as Southwest 
Airlines, Sephora, Nike, and JetBlue. As 
more companies use social media to engage 
with customers, the more customers, and, 
in our case, patrons, will expect to see the 
same level of engagement from libraries 
with Twitter accounts. Questions posed via 
Twitter have increased over the past year. 
Setting up a workflow for responding to 
tweets can help address patron issues. Our 
shared research email inbox also receives 
notifications so staff members at the desk 
can respond. It is important to check if 

someone has already answered a question 
before doing so. 

For university and high school students, 
as with national trends,6 we saw our students 
increase their Twitter use with a corresponding 
decrease in Facebook. With this transition, we 
saw a new communication style in using social 
media. This transition requires library staff to 
reply to tweets using a 140-character limit, 
which may be challenging. Hands-on training 
may be the best way in that it empowers staff 
confidently responding to questions and com-
ments. Periodic review of Twitter interactions 
conducted by staff can also help with training. 

An example of a free online API genera-
tor that does not require programming7 is If 
This Then That (IFTTT). APIs using IFTTT are 

referred 
t o  a s 
recipes. 
R e c i -
pes are 
b a s e d 
on the 
c o n d i -
t i o n a l 
i f / t h e n 
relation-

ships. For example, a library can create a rec-
ipe to automatically tweet to a new follower. 
Another IFTTT opportunity may be for when 
smartphone users enter a specific geo location, 
such as your library. You may want to send an 
automatic tweet that tells your followers that 
you are now at work. IFTTT works with many 
devices as well, such as WeMo switches and 
the Nest thermostat. Possibilities are endless. 

Similar to IFTTT, the Zapier service we use 
at UD is an API generator that allows you to 
create zaps. Zaps work with a variety of social 
media and online websites. Once again, these 
API generators are conditional on an if/then 
relationship. For example, you can create a 
zap to send you an email each time a specific 
Pinterest account pins something new. An-
other example is using this service to notify 
you when a tweet mentions a certain keyword 
in a specific geographic location, as described 
in the previous section.

Example of Twitter recipes from If This Then That.



C&RL News September 2015 436

Conclusion
Your library’s Twitter account has the potential 
to develop a positive reputation on campus and 
increase followers, which ultimately increases 
communication with your users. We realize 
that not every library may have developed a 
nickname, and that is acceptable, too. Some 
institutions may discover over time their library is 
known for a 
particular ser-
vice or regu-
lar event. Ask 
patrons what 
your library 
is known for. 
You may be 
surprised at the names given to your library 
on Twitter. 

Using Twitter effectively requires timely re-
sponsive interactions, as well as an investigative 
interest to see how your library is being used. 
By searching and using APIs, UD has created a 
bird’s eye view of how the library is being used, 
and, if needed, can investigate concerns if API 
notifications are generated. 

Notes
1. Remi Castonguay, “Say it loud: Spreading 

the word with Facebook and Twitter,” College 
&  Research Libraries News 72, no. 7 (2011): 
412-415.

2. Share a #roeschelfie during national li-
brary week 2014, https://www.udayton.edu/
blogs/libraries/2014_04_10_roeschelfie.php ed. 
Vol. 2015. Dayton, OH: University of Dayton 
Libraries.

3. Volun-
teer as tribute 
(club roesch 
v i p )  2 0 1 4 
https://www.
udayton.edu/
blogs/librar-

ies/2014_11_21_tribute.php ed. Vol. 2015. 
Dayton, OH: University of Dayton.

4. Katy Kelly, ACRL marketing discussion 
group, 2014 (cited May 1, 2015). Available from 
http://connect.ala.org/files/ACRLMarketingDis-
cussionGroupAC2014Notes.pdf (accessed May 
1, 2015).

5. Zapier, available at https://zapier.com/.
6. M. Duggan and A. Smith, “Demograph-

ics of key social networking platforms,” Pew 
Research Internet Project 30 (2013).

7. IFTTT, available at https://ifttt.com/.  

Example of a Twitter zap from Zapier.

• Approved the revised name and charge 
for Information Literacy Standards Committee 
to the Information Literacy Frameworks and 
Standards Committee.

• Dissolved the AASL/ACRL Interdivisional 
Committee on Information Literacy.

• Established an ACRL ULS Outstanding 
Professional Development Award, with a 
cash award of $1,000 donated by Library 
Juice Academy.

• Approved the establishment of an Idaho 
ACRL Chapter.

• Approved the renewal of the Image 

Enabling programs and services
Goal Area: Member engagement—Strategic goal areas will be supported by financial 
and operational planning, and will guide the development and implementation of 
programs and services that target education, advocacy, and member engagement.

Resources Interest Group.
• Approved the renewal of the Librarian-

ship in For-Profit Educational Institutions 
Interest Group.

• Approved the renewal of the Residency 
Interest Group.

• Approved the renewal of the Universal 
Accessibility Interest Group.

• Approved the renewal of the Virtual 
World Interest Group.

• Approved resolution of thanks for 
Steven J. Bell, chair of ACRL’s Kick Start the 
Future campaign.  

“ACRL Board of Directors’ actions, June 2015” (continues from page 432)