april17_b.indd


C&RL News April 2017 202

Rather than a day fraught with tricks, April Fool’s Day 2016 turned into a day 
of delights for the 89 participants attending 
the first Transforming Libraries for Gradu-
ate Students: Services, Instruction, Spaces 
Conference (TLGSC) at Kennesaw State 
University (KSU) in Kennesaw, Georgia. 
Seventeen presentations were available 
via three concurrent session tracks with 
discussions covering the gamut of gradu-
ate student-focused topics from tailored 
services and targeted instruction programs 
to graduate-only spaces. While participants 
from the Southeastern region of the United 
States were well represented, participants 
from 19 states plus the District of Columbia 
attended.1 

Planning the conference
The conference was created by librarians in 
the newly formed Graduate Library at Ken-
nesaw State University,2 born of their de-
sire to sit down with peers and exchange 
experiences of serving graduate students. 
An initial concept for a day of discussion 
among people within driving distance of 
Atlanta turned into a national conference, 
which in turn has generated a strong de-
sire to create a framework for continued 
exchange. 

While graduate student bodies may be far 
smaller in number than that of their under-
graduate counterparts, graduate students are 
nonetheless critical stakeholders for librar-

ies. They use scholarly resources intensely,3 
and universities are judged in part on the 
quality of future faculty they train, as well 
as graduates of master’s programs. While 
there is a considerable amount of literature 
on serving graduate students, and there are 
a sprinkling of panels at major conferences 
on the topic, meetings for the purpose of 
sharing experience and networking are rare, 
apart from the 2007 Association of Research 
Libraries-sponsored conference “Enhancing 
Graduate Education: A Fresh Look at Library 
Engagement.”4

The birth of a new conference is not a 
trivial endeavor. A core team of four gradu-
ate librarians, two graduate assistants and the 
Digital Commons managing editor worked 
countless hours for the better part of a year 
to bring the conference to reality. An off-site 
retreat served as the catalyst for brainstorm-
ing the conference title, scope, structure, 
location, timelines, and other implemen-
tation tasks. The conference website and 
marketing logos were created by our Digital 
Commons managing editor, and, building off 
the striking harlequin logo/banner for the 
conference he created, our graduate research 

Crystal Renfro and Elisabeth Shields

Transforming libraries to serve 
graduate students
Trends and issues from a new conference

Cr ystal Renfro is graduate engineering librarian, 
email: crenfro1@kennesaw.edu, and Elisabeth Shields 
is graduate librarian, Business, Social Sciences, and 
Humanities, email: eshield5@k ennesaw.edu, at 
Kennesaw State University Library System 
 
© 2017 Crystal Renfro and Elisabeth Shields



April 2017 203 C&RL News

assistant (GRA) created bookmarks, confer-
ence programs, name tags, and conference 
directories. The GRA also handled mass 
emails to conference participants and main-
tained the conference participant database. 
Our GRAs also attended the conference, 
experiencing firsthand exactly what librar-
ians are attempting to do to support them 
and their school colleagues in their scholarly 
endeavors. Their support and insight proved 
to be invaluable at every step along the way.

One early question the committee faced 
was whether there was sufficient interest 
among the library community on the topic 
of graduate student services and spaces to 
warrant a full-day conference. 

If a call for proposals was opened, 
would anyone respond? While we expected 
interest from Georgia institutions and other 
southeastern states, as soon as we started 
receiving proposals, we realized we were re-
ceiving high-quality proposals from around 
the country.

Conference participants: Functions, 
structures, and institution type 
Conference attendance also proved to be 
national with 45 institutions represented. 
While over half of the participants (49) 
were from Georgia and another 13% came 
from adjacent states, a full 32% traveled 
from varied locations spread across the na-
tion. 

Carnegie research institutions (R1, R2, 
R3) were heavily represented (82%), while 
masters-granting institutions added an ad-
ditional 14.6% to the mix. There were even 
representatives from four predominantly 
undergraduate institutions.

Looking at the titles of participants, it 
seems that having units or even dedicated 
librarians for graduate services is the excep-
tion: only eight participants had titles such 
as graduate services librarian and another 
three headed specialized graduate services 
units. Overwhelmingly, services to gradu-
ate students are performed by people who 
are not dedicated full time to such activi-
ties. Rather than a dedicated unit, several 

institutions have appointed coordinators of 
graduate services.

 Most commonly, it appears, research 
and instruction librarians work together as 
needed to provide services.

Cross-cutting issues
Ways to discover student needs and mecha-
nisms of assessing services were popular 
topics. Methods include surveys of faculty 
as well as graduate students; focus groups 
of students and of faculty; and various 
observation and participatory methods. It 
was relevant to identify the needs of dif-
ferent types of graduate students: full- or 
part-time; in academically oriented or pro-
fessional programs; single pre-career stu-
dents fresh from undergraduate programs 
or older students juggling career, family, 
and study; distance or campus-based. Un-
derstanding the unique needs of individual 
academic departments and programs is also 
essential.

Points were raised about the gap be-
tween common assumptions about graduate 
students and their actual skills and experi-
ence. For example, faculty may overestimate 
incoming graduate students’ skill at library 
research. Mid-career students who are accus-
tomed to professional reading and writing 
may need to readjust their habits for gradu-
ate school. Graduate students may not be 
as grounded in disciplinary or theoretical 
knowledge as faculty expect. This is espe-
cially true for students returning to school 
after a gap, but other reasons include the rise 
of interdisciplinary programs and new fields 
of study. When faculty have little time to 
work with students on these issues, libraries 
may find new ways to help students transi-
tion into the graduate student role.

We also discussed meeting students’ 
needs in different phases of the graduate 
lifecycle:

• in the coursework phase of doctoral 
programs, assistance with searching and 
managing citations; 

• in the middle (writing) phase, help 
with using technology, data management, 



C&RL News April 2017 204

and communication with different kinds of 
audiences; and 

• as they finish, help with publication 
(publishing, determining impact of one’s 
scholarly work, writing for impact) and job 
searches.

While students aiming for academic teach-
ing or research positions need to understand 
scholarly communication issues, libraries 
might best assist students in professional 
programs by identifying industry-critical skills. 
In addition to traditional library instruction 
focusing on academic literature, students 
will appreciate learning about sources they 
will be able to use outside of academic en-
vironments.

Partnerships outside the library are criti-
cal. We work with faculty, graduate colleges, 
centers for teaching and learning, offices 
of research, writing centers, counseling 
services, technology departments, and in-
ternational student units. Several institutions 
have established advisory groups including 
graduate students and, sometimes, gradu-
ate faculty.

Instruction
Instruction programs for graduate students 
include extensions of typical library instruc-
tion, such as complex searching, searching 
using discipline-based subject terms, prac-
tical literature review classes, and citation 
management. Such classes may be either 
discipline-specific or offered generally. 

Some librarians offer instruction in areas 
not traditionally considered the purview 
of libraries. Examples include managing 
academic work flow, illustrating informa-
tion visually, formal presentation skills, and 
designing and exhibiting posters.

Librarians also have become involved 
in dissertation and thesis “boot camps.” 
Others participate in writing instruction 
through partnerships with writing centers. 
These have included campus-wide writing 
initiatives and special topics like writing for 
the job market.

Techniques developed for reaching grad-
uate students include offering instruction 

both on Saturdays and weekdays; scheduling 
classes in the evening; and offering classes 
on federal holidays, when many full-time 
workers have time available. Online mod-
ules serve campus-based students as well 
as distance students, though librarians may 
have difficulty finding time to script, record, 
and edit self-help video clips. Once created, 
however, these modules can be embedded 
in courseware and research guides, or of-
fered more publicly through YouTube. When 
such modules are available, they can lead 
to more requests for instruction and for 
individual consultations.

Services
Individual consultation with graduate stu-
dents is a standard service with consulta-
tions occurring via email, chat, and online 
screen sharing programs as well as face-to-
face. 

A few institutions or programs have made 
consultation mandatory. When mandatory 
programs represent a major shift in use of 
librarian time, they can prove disruptive to 
the librarians’ workflow. 

Additional services offered by librar-
ies include offering internships in digital 
humanities in which students gain and use 
mastery of visual and digital publishing tools, 
electronic theses and dissertations templates, 
digital repositorie, poster competitions, and 
student conferences.

Some institutions provide either separate 
space for graduate students or scholars or 
research commons suitable for graduate 
students. Because graduate students may 
spend long hours in their study/research 
space, comfort is a key element. 

Methods for including student participa-
tion in the design process include surveys 
for initial needs assessment and soliciting 
students’ comments on early versions of 
designs. Sample results of such feedback in-
dicated that graduate students most wanted 
quiet; ample electrical outlets; space that is 
both adequate and appropriate for reading 
and writing; storage for materials; comfort-
able seating (such as height adjustable 



April 2017 205 C&RL News

chairs); and natural light with a separate, but 
nearby break space. While dedicated gradu-
ate student space is likely to be oriented to 
individual work, a scholars’ commons may 
consciously attempt to create community by 
crossing disciplinary boundaries and incor-
porating visualization and presentation tech-
nology. While creating flexible spaces with 
movable furniture and whiteboards seems 
ideal, such features may disrupt the primary 
goal of silent space. 

Conference follow-up
A concluding conference wrap-up session 
involved lively group table discussions re-
garding key takeaways and follow-up goals 
for individuals. Follow-up goals ranged 
from investigating new software to develop-
ing new graduate programming to develop-
ing new partnerships with campus offices 
and carrying the messages learned back to 
library administration for further discussion.

The conference evaluation provided 
significant positive feedback and marked 
enthusiasm for continuing the conversation 
online and via another conference. The 
Graduate Library at Kennesaw State is look-
ing into options for building a community 
online and holding a follow-up conference 
in 2018. Participant suggestions for that con-
ference include forming a multi-institution 
planning group and including an evening 
of networking time, more interactive session 
formats, and more sessions oriented toward 
professional and master’s degree programs.

A number of common themes emerged 
throughout the TLGSC. We learned that librar-
ians around the country are thinking about 
their graduate students, looking for ways to 
meet their graduate students with the right 
information at just the right time in their 
educational paths. We recognize that graduate 
students are very different from undergradu-
ate students, and, often, very different from 
one another when students from diverse 
graduate curricula are compared. Establish-
ing relationships with university partners 
external to the library, as well as working 
with our librarian peers, is essential, and tak-

ing advantage of university activities where 
graduate students will congregate is a great 
way to reach our target audience. We learned 
that many graduate students feel isolated, or 
even forgotten, and most appreciate study 
spaces and programs designed to help make 
their journey easier. We learned to try new 
things, and not be afraid of piloting creative 
ideas that may not work out as we hoped, 
because the only true failure is not trying at 
all. Most of all, we learned we are not alone 
in our work. We met new friends, gathered 
new ideas, and left re-energized to take up 
our work again.5 

Notes
1. Slides from most presentations are 

available on the conference website, http://
digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/gradlibconf/. 
Choose the link to the full program.

2. Kennesaw State is one of the larger 
Georgia public universities. Started as a junior 
college in 1963, KSU became a four-year col-
lege in fall 1978 and instituted its first masters 
programs in business administration and 
elementary education in 1985. The number 
of new graduate programs grew modestly in 
the 1990s and faster in the 2000s. The first 
doctoral program was added in 2006, and a 
PhD program in international conflict man-
agement in 2010. Reflecting KSU’s increasing 
importance in graduate education in Geor-
gia, KSU was classified as a comprehensive 
university within the University System of 
Georgia in 2013, and as a Carnegie R3 insti-
tution in 2015

3. Betsy Wilson, University Libraries, 
University of Washington, quoted in “En-
hancing Graduate Education: A Fresh Look 
at Library Engagement,” ARL 256 (February 
2008), p. 1, accessed June 24, 2016. https://
www.cni.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/11 
/arl-br-256.pdf

4. Ibid.
5. For more information on the Transform-

ing Libraries for Graduate Students: Services, 
Instruction, Spaces Conference, please visit the 
conference website at http://digitalcommons. 
kennesaw.edu/gradlibconf/.