id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
cblr-1208	Morgenstern, Saul P.; Pergament, Adam M	Commentary: “Applying the Rule of Reason in the Post-Actavis World”	2018	25	.pdf	application/pdf	8687	386	55	But the Court rejected the FTC’s position that reverse payment settlement agreements are presumptively unlawful and subject to review under the “quick look” test.20 Instead, under Actavis, courts must scrutinize reverse payment settlement agreements under the “Rule of Reason. In FTC v. Actavis, 133 S. Ct. 2223 (2013), the Supreme Court held that in cases challenging alleged “reverse payment” settlements of patent litigation arising in the context of the Hatch-Waxman Act, the Rule of Reason applies—no per se rules, no quick look, no shortcuts.	cache/cblr-1208.pdf	txt/cblr-1208.txt