id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
cblr-2954	Liebermann, Neil	Justice Jackson in the Boardroom: A Proposal for Judicial Treatment of Shareholder-Approved Poison Pills	2008	27	.pdf	application/pdf	9273	412	54	607, 608 (1999) (noting that the first bylaw mandating shareholder approval for poison pills was proposed in 1996); John C. Coffee, The Bylaw Battlefield: Can Institutions Change the Outcome of Corporate Control Contests, 51 U. MIAMI L. REV. 605, 616 (1997) (Delaware law suggests that shareholders do have the right to restrict the board for the future .. . . Poison Pills, Deadhand Pills, and Shareholder-Adopted Bylaws: An Essay for Warren Buffett, 19 CARDOZO L. REV. 511, 546-52 (1997) (acknowledging that an inquiry into the powers granted to shareholders and directors leads to a recursive loop, but arguing that shareholders should be able to require shareholder approval of poison pills through corporate bylaws). ' See Unisuper, 2005 WL 3529317, at *6 ([Wjhen shareholders exercise their right to vote in order to assert control over the business and affairs of the corporation, the board must give way.). ' Stuart M. Grant & Megan D. McIntyre, Unisuper v. News Corporation: Affirmation that Shareholders, Not Directors, Are the Ultimate Holders of Corporate Power, 1557 PLI/CORP 17, 19 (2006). ' A. Gilchrist Sparks, III, Corporate Democracy - What It Is, What It Isn't, and What It Should Be, 1543 PLI/CoRP 279, 284 n.8 (2006) ([T]o the extent [Unisuper] suggests that directors . .	cache/cblr-2954.pdf	txt/cblr-2954.txt