id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
cjel-3536	Mank, Bradford C.	Standing to View Other People’s Land: The D.C. Circuit’s Divided Decision in Sierra Club v. Jewell	2019	17	.pdf	application/pdf	6575	275	55	See, e.g., Summers v. Earth Island Inst., 555 U.S. 488, 492–94, 496–500 (2009) (rejecting probabilistic proof of standing injury in case alleging that the Forest Service’s sales of timber from government lands failed to protect the public interest in accessing and enjoying those lands and demanding that environmental plaintiffs demonstrate a specific time and place where they suffer a concrete injury); Lujan, 504 U.S. at 573–78 (concluding that Articles II and III of the Constitution limit Congress’s authority to authorize citizen suits by any person lacking a concrete injury, requiring environmental plaintiffs to demonstrate a specific injury for standing and thus rejecting environmental suit alleging potential future harm to plaintiffs’ aesthetic interest in viewing endangered species in foreign countries at some possible future time); Mank, Clapper, supra note *, at 240–49 (discussing Justice Scalia’s strict separation of powers approach to standing in general and in Summers and Lujan decisions); see also Andrew C. Sand, Standing Uncertainty: An Expected-Value Standard for Fear-Based Injury in Clapper v. Amnesty International USA, 113 MICH. Part V discusses how the Supreme Court might address the issue of standing rights for those who view private lands they have no right to enter.	cache/cjel-3536.pdf	txt/cjel-3536.txt