id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
cjel-5478	Miller, Robin S.	NRDC c. SEC: A Question of Judicial Review	2020	26	.pdf	application/pdf	10512	632	61	The reviewing court shall- (1) compel agency action unlawfully withheld or unreasonably delayed; and (2) hold unlawful and set aside agency action, findings, and conclusions found to be- (A) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in ac- cordance with law; (B) contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity; (C) in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right; (D) without observance of procedure required by law; (E) unsupported by substantial evidence in a case subject to sections 556 [6: 217 NRDC v. SEC a balance between efficient and effective agency action and the fair- ness of agency decision making. Although the case predates NEPA, its interpretation of the APA and judicial review of agency decisions is helpful when questions of enforcement arise.	cache/cjel-5478.pdf	txt/cjel-5478.txt