id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
cjgl-2406	Chusid, Jodie Leith	Tanner v. Oregon Health Sciences University: Justifying the Mandate for Domestic Partner Benefits	1999	42	.pdf	application/pdf	16667	811	51	Instead, Oregon courts look at whether the reasoning behind the classification is rational or stereotypical. CONCLUSION The Court of Appeals decision in Tanner v. Oregon Health Sciences University will be much anticipated.210 This Article illustrates that precedent, statutory language and history, legislative intent, and constitutional analysis can and should be interpreted to deem Defendants' policy and practice of denying homosexual domestic partners benefits afforded heterosexual married partners both illegal and unconstitutional.	cache/cjgl-2406.pdf	txt/cjgl-2406.txt