id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
cjgl-2625	Seo, Jennifer Y.	Raising the Standard of Abortion Informed Consent: Lessons to be Learned from the Ethical and Legal Requirements for Consent to Medical Experimentation	2011	55	.pdf	application/pdf	15950	700	47	Planned Parenthood of the Heartland v. Heineman shows why further guidance on the content of the risk disclosures is needed.14 1 There, the District Court for the District of Nebraska enjoined Nebraska from enforcing a bill signed by the governor in April 2010 that imposed extensive abortion risk disclosures based on the legislature's finding that the existing standard of care for preabortion screening and counseling is not always adequate to protect the health needs of women and that clarifying the minimum standard of care for preabortion screening and counseling in statute is a practical means of protecting the well-being of women .... ,,142 Nebraska, within the context of Gonzales's greater deference to legislative decisions in determining medical risk, had made this finding based not on a general consensus of the scientific community, but on a few anecdoctal stories about women who had had adverse psychological effects after an abortion and despite 140 Id. 141 Planned Parenthood of Heartland v. Heineman, 724 F. Supp. However, City of Akron and Thornburg's requirements of patient-centric, individualized, and focused informed consent disclosures were overruled by Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, which set the current standard for abortion informed consent disclosures.	cache/cjgl-2625.pdf	txt/cjgl-2625.txt