id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
cjgl-7058	Hammock, Christen	Mary Doe ex rel. Satan?: Parody, Religious Liberty, & Reproductive Rights	2020	47	.pdf	application/pdf	18763	854	54	Mary Doe sued in federal court to enjoin the law as applied to herself and other abortion patients with similar deeply-held beliefs about the abortion decision. By effectively “repeating” religious liberty claims like those made by the Hobby Lobby plaintiffs in the abortion context, the Temple’s challenges change the focus of the legal conversation from abortion rights (which are often insufficiently protected by courts) to religious accommodation (to which courts have been overly deferential even in the face of scientific error).15 By overcoming “abortion exceptionalism”16 that often proliferates both culturally and in lower court decisions, the Temple’s parody helps get abortion litigation “unstuck” from Casey’s undue burden test and opens up space for creative legal arguments against abortion restrictions, which go beyond pure questions of access.17 15 Caroline Mala Corbin, Abortion Distortions, 71 WASH. & LEE L. REV. 1175, 1205 (2014)	cache/cjgl-7058.pdf	txt/cjgl-7058.txt