id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
cjgl-8837	Srinivasan, Divya; Kannan, Bharti	Establishing the Unconstitutionality of Menstrual Exclusion Practices in India	2021	10	.pdf	application/pdf	3734	132	36	In fact, a 2016 study found that only one in eight adolescent girls in India faced no restrictions at all during menstruation.1 The constitutionality of menstrual exclusion practices has most famously been challenged in the Sabarimala case, where the Indian Supreme Court in a 4:1 majority found that the law restricting entry of women of menstruating age into the Sabarimala temple violated women’s constitutional rights to religion and equality. Expanding on this theme, Justice Chandrachud’s ruling is premised on three main grounds that lay a solid foundation for further constitutional challenges to menstrual exclusion practices.	cache/cjgl-8837.pdf	txt/cjgl-8837.txt