Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis ISSN: 1074-133X Vol 32 No. 5s (2025) 511 https://internationalpubls.com Classification of Maps on Intervals That Exhibit Dense Periodic Points *Suja N Thomas,**P.B Vinod Kumar Rajagiri School of Engineering and Technology, Kochi APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University, Kerala, India. *sujanthomas72@gmail.com Muthoot Institute of Technology and Science, Kochi APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University, Kerala, India. **vinodkumarpb@mgits.ac.in Article History: Received: 14-10-2024 Revised: 28-11-2024 Accepted: 10-12-2024 Abstract: In this paper, continuous maps on interval with dense set of periodic points such that the periods being set of natural numbers are studied.These maps named as Peri- odically Rich maps could be divided into two classes on Interval, such as the maps with period four points having increasing periodic orbit and the maps with two fixed points such that image of a subset of Interval does not belong to the same subset. Notion of bigness of Periodically Rich maps is also discussed. Keywords: Set of periods, Transitive maps, Dense Periodic points. 1. INTRODUCTION Let X be a Hausdorff topological space and f : X → X be a continuous map. x ∈ X such that f (x) = x is called a fixed point of f . A point x ∈ X is called a periodic point if there exists n ∈ Z+ such that fn(x) = x. The smallest n for which fn(x) = x is called the period of f . The set of periodic points of period n is denoted by Pern(f ) and the set of periods of f is denoted by P (f ), i.e., Pern(f ) = {x ∈ X|fn(x) = x and fm(x) /= x, ∀m < n} P (f ) = {n ∈ Z+|Pern(f ) /= ∅}. Per(f ) = S n∈Z+ Pern(f ) is the set of periodic points of f . The forward orbit of a point x ∈ X under the mapping f is denoted by Of (x),i.e., Of (x) = {x, f (x), . . . , fn(x), . . . }. If x ∈ Pern(f ) then {x, f (x), . . . , fn−1(x)} is called periodic orbit of x, in this case clearly |Of (x)| = n. The periodic orbit of a point x in I = [0, 1] is said to be increasing if x < f (x) < · · · < fn−1(x). A map f is said to be transitive, if for every pair of non-empty open subsets U and V in X, there exists a positive integer n such that fn(U ) ∩ V /= φ. In general, the set of periodic points Per(f ) can be empty, a finite set, a countable set or an uncountable set . Per(f ) can be even rich so that Per(f ) = X, which is one of the condition for f to be chaotic in the sense of Devaney [5]. If f is transitive on I then Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis ISSN: 1074-133X Vol 32 No. 5s (2025) 512 https://internationalpubls.com Per(f ) = I [12]. A point x ∈ I is recurrent if for each neighborhood U of x there exists n ∈ Z+ such that fn(x) ∈ U ; the set of recurrent points is denoted by Rec(f ). It is proved in [3] that for map f on I, Per(f ) = Rec(f ). For maps on I, Per1(f )∪Per2(f ) is closed [4]. Considering the set of periods, P (f ) can also be empty, a finite or an infinite subset of Z+ or the whole Z+. Sharkovskii has proved that for maps on R or I, if n ∈ P (f ) then m ∈ P (f ) for every m which follows n in the Sharkovskii ordering 3 ≺ 5 ≺ 7 ≺ 9 ≺ ... ≺ 2.3 ≺ 2.5 ≺ 2.7 ≺ ...22.3 ≺ 22.5 ≺ ...23.3 ≺ 23.5 ≺ 23.7... ≺ 23 ≺ 22 ≺ 2 ≺ 1. [10] At this juncture a natural question arises. Is there any relation between Per (f ) and P (f )? The question prompts to think about the ’bigness’ of set of periodic points. More specifically, the ‘bigness’ of set of periodic points is treated in two ways, (1) Perf = X and (2) P (f ) = Z+. To understand, some examples are listed below. Example 1. A map for which Per(f ) = X and P (f ) /= Z+ Let f : I —→ I be defined as 2 x + 1/2, 0 ≤ x ≤ 1/4 f1(x) = - 2x + 3/2, 1/4 < x ≤ 3/4 2x- 3/2, 3/4 < x ≤ 1 FIGURE 1. Graph of f1 Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis ISSN: 1074-133X Vol 32 No. 5s (2025) 513 https://internationalpubls.com 1 1 1 1 Fixed point of f1 is at x = 1/2. f1([0, 1/2]) = [1/2, 1] and f1([1/2, 1]) = [0, 1/2] f 2([0, 1/2]) = f1(f1([0, 1/2])) = f1([1/2, 1]) = [0, 1/2] f 2([1/2, 1]) = f1(f1([1/2, 1])) = f1([0, 1/2]) = [1/2, 1] f 3([0, 1/2]) = f1(f 2([0, 1/2])) = f1([0, 1/2]) = [1/2, 1] 1 1 f 3([1/2, 1]) = f1(f 2([1/2, 1])) = f1([1/2, 1]) = [0, 1/2] 1 1 So, f 3(x) /= x for all x ∈ [0, 1] except for x = 1/2. Similarly, if n is odd, fn(x) /= x, ∀x ∈ [0, 1] except for x = 1/2. If n is even, fn([0, 1/2]) = [0, 1/2] and fn([1/2, 1]) = [1/2, 1]. i.e., fn has fixed points 1 1 1 in [0, 1] for even n. So there are points with even periods in [0, 1]. Therefore P (f1) = Z+\{3, 5, 7, . . . }. On the other hand,if x is any irrational number in [0, 1] then Of1 (x) = I. So f1 is transitive on I [11]. Hence Per(f1) = I [12]. Example 2. Consider a map with P (f ) = Z+ and Per(f ) /= X. Let f2 : I → I be defined as FIGURE 2. Graph of f2 3x, 0 ≤ x ≤ 1/3 f2(x) = 1 , 1/3 < x ≤ 2/3 3- 3x, 2/3 < x ≤ 1 Of2 (9/28) = {9/28, 27/28, 3/28}. Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis ISSN: 1074-133X Vol 32 No. 5s (2025) 514 https://internationalpubls.com 2 4 i.e., 9/28 is a periodic point of period 3. Hence by proposition 1, P (f2) = Z+. Now consider open sets U and V in (1/3, 2/3). fn(U ) = fn(V ) = {0}, ∀ n ∈ Z+. So, 2 2 there does not exists n ∈ Z+ such that fn(U ) ∩ V /= ∅. Therefore Per(f2) /= I. Example 3. Tent map defined on I. f3 (x) = 2x, 0 ≤ x ≤ 1/2 2(1 — x), 1/2 < x ≤ 1 P (f3) = Z+ and Per(f3) = I [9]. Example 4. Consider f4 defined on I by f4(x) = x2. Fixed points are 0, 1 and fn(x) → 0, ∀x ∈ (0, 1). So no periodic points other than fixed points. Here neither Per(f4) /= I nor P (f4) /= Z+. FIGURE 3. Graph of f3 FIGURE 4. Graph of f4 Example 5. Let Sı = {z ∈ C |ı z ı= 1} and f5 : Sı —→ Sı be defined as f5(z) = z2. Per(f5) = Sı and | Pern(f5) |= 2n — 1, n ≥ 1 [6] Example 6. Let f6 : R —→ R be defined as f (x) = x2−7 . 6 2 Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis ISSN: 1074-133X Vol 32 No. 5s (2025) 515 https://internationalpubls.com FIGURE 5. Graph of f6 Per3(f6) /= ∅ and therefore P (f6) = Z+ [10]. Also Per(f6) ∩ Q = ∅ and Per(f6) = R. Example 7. Let f7 : C —→ C be defined as f7(z) = z2 — z. P (f7) = Z+\{2} [2]. Here Per(f7) /= C. From the examples given above, it is observed that there is no implication between P (f ) = Z+ and Per(f ) = X. Definition 1. Let f be a continuous map defined on a topological space X. We say that f is Periodically Rich if f has both a dense set of periodic points and the set of periods is equal to Z+. i.e., f is Periodically Rich if (1) Per(f ) = X and (2) P (f ) = Z+. Let PR(X) be the set of continuous maps on X which are Periodically Rich. If PR(X) /= ∅, we say that X admits Periodically Rich maps. For example Interval I admits Periodi- cally Rich maps since tent map satisfies both the conditions of definition. 2. PERIODICALLY RICH MAPS ON INTERVAL The following proposition is a corollary to Sharkovskii’s result. Proposition 1. For continuous maps f : I → I if Per3(f ) /= ∅ then P (f ) = Z+. Proposition 2. Let f : I —→ I be a continuous map. If f is transitive and Per3(f ) /= ∅ then f ∈ PR(I). Proof. If f is transitive then Per(f ) = I [12] and Per3(f ) /= ∅ implies P (f ) = Z+ by proposition Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis ISSN: 1074-133X Vol 32 No. 5s (2025) 516 https://internationalpubls.com 1. Hence f ∈ PR(I). Proposition 3. Let f : I —→ I be a transitive map. If there exists x ∈ Per4(f ) with increasing orbit then f ∈ PR(I). Since f is transitive, Per(f ) = I [12]. We use the following lemmas from the literature [1] to show that Per3(f ) /= φ. Lemma 1. Let f : I → I be a continuous map and let J, K c I be closed intervals with f (J) m K, then there exists a closed interval H c J with f (H) = K. Lemma 2. Let f : I → I be a continuous map. Suppose H and K are closed intervals with H c K c I and f (H) = K, then f has a fixed point in H. Proof of Proposition 3: Let x ∈ Per4(f ) with increasing orbit, i.e., x < f (x) < f 2(x) < f 3(x). f ([x, f (x)]) m [f (x), f 2(x)] f ([f (x), f 2(x)]) m [f 2(x), f 3(x)] f ([f 2(x), f 3(x)]) m [x, f (x)] So by lemma 2, there exists F1 c [x, f (x)] such that f (F1) = [f (x), f 2(x)] F2 c [f (x), f 2(x)] such that f (F2) = [f 2(x), f 3(x)] F3 c [f 2(x), f 3(x)] such that f (F3) = [x, f (x)]. Now, f 2(F3) = f (F1); f 2(F1) = f (F2); f 2(F2) = [x, f (x)].Therefore [x, f (x)] = f 3(F1). So by lemma 2, f 3 has a fixed point in F1, say y. Now y /∈ Per2(f ), since f 2(y) ∈ [f (x), f 2(x)]. Therefore y ∈ Per3(f ). So Per3(f ) /= ∅. Now, by Proposition 2, f ∈ PR(I). Proposition 4. Let f be a continuous map such that (i) f (x) = x for some x ∈ (0, 1) (ii) f (1) = 1 Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis ISSN: 1074-133X Vol 32 No. 5s (2025) 517 https://internationalpubls.com (iii) For every J c I, f (J) /⊆ J (iv) f is transitive. Then f ∈ PR(I). Before proving proposition, we prove a lemma. Lemma 3. Let f : I → I be a map and there exists a < b < c in (0, 1) such that (i) f (a) = a (ii) f (c) ≤ a (iii) f (b) ≥ c then P (f ) = Z+. Proof. Let a < b < c and f (a) = a. Let f (b) = br, f (c) = cr. For given conditions, cr ≤ a and c ≤ br. So c ∈ [cr, br]. By Intermediate value theorem, there exists x ∈ [b, c] such that f (x) = c. Now since x ∈ (a, br) , f (a) = a,and f (b) = br by Intermediate value theorem, there exists y ∈ (a, b) with f (y) = x. Therefore cr = f (c) < y < x = f (y) < c = f (x). By standard result [8], P (f ) = Z+ Proof of Proposition 4: By condition (i), there exists a ∈ (0, 1) such that f (a) = a and FIGURE 6. Case 1 of Proposition 4 by condition (ii), f (1) = 1. Let us take one of the two possibilities f (0) /= 1 or f (0) = 1. Case 1: If f (0) /= 1. Let m = sup{f (x)|x ∈ (0, a]}. Clearly m > a. There are two possibilities either m /= 1 or m = 1. Consider m /= 1. Let b = inf{x ∈ (a, m]|f (x) > m}, then for all x ∈ [a, b], f (x) ≤ m, andf (b) > m. Let ar = sup{x ∈ [a, b]|f (x) = x}, ar ∈ [a, b). Now f (x) > x for all x ∈ (ar, b] and f ([ar, b]) = [ar, m]. Let n = min{f (x)|x ∈ [b, 1]} and c = inf{x ∈ [b, 1]|f (x) = n}. Now ar > f (c) = n. Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis ISSN: 1074-133X Vol 32 No. 5s (2025) 518 https://internationalpubls.com Claim: There exists d ∈ (ar, c) such that f (d) > c. If c < m, take d = b. If c ≥ m, there exists y ∈ (b, c) such that f (y) > c, take d = y. Claim is proved. So we have, ar < d < c with f (ar) = ar, f (c) ≤ f (ar) and c < f (d). By lemma 3, P (f ) = Z+. Now consider the other case m = 1. Let x ∈ [0, a] such that f (x) = m = 1. Let n = min{f (x)|x ∈ [a, 1]} and let FIGURE 7. when m = 1, n ≥ x f (c) = n, c ∈ [a, 1]. Either n /= 0 or n = 0. If n /= 0 and n ≥ x,then there exists z ∈ (x, a) such that f (z) ≥ x. So x < z < a with f (x) ≥ f (a) and x ≤ f (z). By lemma 3, P (f ) = Z+. If n /= 0 and n < x, then there exists z ∈ (n, a) such that f (z) > n. Here z ∈ (n, x) ∪ (x, a). If z ∈ (n, x) then z < x < c with f (z) > z and f (x) > x. De- fine g(y) = f (y) — y. By Intermediate value theorem, there exists s ∈ (z, x) such that g(s) = 0 and g(z) < 0, g(x) > 0. Therefore s ∈ (z, x) is fixed for f . So s < x < c with fixed s, f (c) ≤ f (s) and c ≤ f (x). By lemma 3, P (f ) = Z+. FIGURE 8. when m = 1, n < x Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis ISSN: 1074-133X Vol 32 No. 5s (2025) 519 https://internationalpubls.com Case 2: If f (0) = 1 Let c ∈ (0, 1) such that f (c) = 0. If such c doesn’t exist, p = inf{f (x)|x ∈ I} > 0. Hence [p, 0] is invariant under f . So there exists z ∈ (c, 1) such that f (z) = c. Therefore P (f ) = Z+. By condition (iv), Per(f ) = I. Therefore f ∈ PR(I). Hence the proof. We summarize the above propositions 3 and 4 as given below Proposition 5. Let f be transitive map on I. Then f ∈ PR(I) if f belongs to anyone of the following two classes. Class 1. There exists x ∈ Per4(f ) with increasing periodic orbit. Class 2. (i) f (x) = x for some x ∈ (0, 1) (ii) f (1) = 1 (iii) For every J c I, f (J) /⊆ J. Now, we shall give an example to show that transitivity of f is not a necessary condition for f to be in PR(X). Example 8. Let f : R → R be defined as 3x, 0 ≤ x ≤ 1/3 -3x + 2, 1/3 ≤ x < 2/3 f (x) = 3x — 2, 2/3 < x ≤ 1 f (x — 1) + 1, x ≥ 1 f (x + 1) — 1, x ≤ 0 Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis ISSN: 1074-133X Vol 32 No. 5s (2025) 520 https://internationalpubls.com FIGURE 9. Graph of f f|[n,n+1] has one fixed point in (n, n + 1) fi|[n,n+1] has 3i — 2 fixed points in (n, n + 1). If x and y are fixed points of f i in (n, n + 1), then |fi(x) — fi(y)| < (1/3)i−1. Therefore Per(f ) = R. Hence f ∈ PR(R). Here f is not transitive. Note: Let C(I) be the space of all continuous function defined on I and let (i) T (I) = {f ∈ C(I)|f is transitive} FIGURE 10. The relationship between Per(I),P (I),T (I),and PR(I). (ii) Per(I) = {f ∈ C(I)|Per(f ) = I} (iii) P (I) = {f ∈ C(I)|P (f ) = Z+}. Then we have, T (I) c Per(I) and PR(I) = Per(I) ∩ P (I). Also T (I) ∩ P (I) /= ∅ (see figure 10). Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis ISSN: 1074-133X Vol 32 No. 5s (2025) 521 https://internationalpubls.com 2 4 2ϴ It is proved that T (I) ∼= T (I) ∼= l2 [7]. Now, we shall prove the following proposition. Proposition 6. P (I) = C(I). Proof. Let c be a fixed point of f , i.e., f (c) = c. Given an ϵ > 0, we will construct a g ∈ P (I) such that P (g) = Z+. Case 1: c /= 1. Since f is continuous at c, there exists a δ > 0 (choose δ < є ) such that |f (x) — c| < ϵ , for all x ∈ [c, c + δ]. 2 Let θ = δ , A be [c, c + 2θ] and B be [c + 2θ, c + 3θ]. Define g1 : A → A as FIGURE 11. Graph of g1 g1 (x) = 2x-c, x ∈ [c, c + θ] -2x + 3c + 4θ. x ∈ [c + θ, c + 2θ]. (see figure 11 ) g1 on [c, c + 2θ] is topologically conjugate to the tent map on [0, 1] defined by T (x) = 2x, ≤ x ≤ 1/2 2(1 — x), 1/ 2 ≤ x ≤ 1 via the homeomorphism h : [c, c + 2θ] → [0, 1] defined as h(x) = x−c . Therefore Per(g1) = [c, c + 2θ]. Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis ISSN: 1074-133X Vol 32 No. 5s (2025) 522 https://internationalpubls.com 2 θ 7 x∈A x∈A Let g2 : B → [0, 1] be defined as g (x) = c + (x — c — 2θ) f (c + 3θ) — c . i.e., the graph of g2 is a line segment joining (c + 2θ, c) and (c + 3θ, f (c + 3θ)) (see figure 12 ). FIGURE 12. Graph of g2 FIGURE 13. Graph of g at c /= 1 Now, define g : [0, 1] → [0, 1] as f (x), x ∈ [0, 1]\(A ∪ B) g(x) = g1(x), x ∈ A g2(x), x ∈ B (see figure 13 ). 0, x ∈ [0, 1]\(A ∪ B) |f (x) — g(x)| = f (x) — g1(x)|, x ∈ A (x) — g2(x)|, x ∈ B Hence f — g = max{max |f (x) — g1(x)|, max |f (x) — g2(x)|} x∈A x∈B ≤ max max |f (x) — c| + max |c — g1(x)| , max |f (x) — c| + max |c — g2(x)| Let x0 = c + 4 θ. x∈B < max{ ϵ + ϵ , , ϵ + 2 4 2 x∈B ϵ } = max{ 3ϵ 2 4 , ϵ} = ϵ. Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis ISSN: 1074-133X Vol 32 No. 5s (2025) 523 https://internationalpubls.com Therefore x0 ∈ Per3(g). Hence P (g) = Z+. Case 2: If c = 1. Let A be [1 — 2θ, 1] and B be [1 — 3θ, 1 — 2θ]. Let g1 : A → A be defined as g (x) = 2x-1, x ∈ [1 — θ, 1] 3 — 2x — 4θ, x ∈ [1 — 2θ, 1 — θ] Let g2 : B → [0, 1] be defined as 𝑔2(𝑥) = 𝑓 (1 — 3𝜃) + (𝑥 — 1 + 3𝜃)(1 — 𝑓 (1 — 3𝜃)) 𝜃 Let g : [0, 1] → [0, 1] be such that f (x), x ∈ [0, 1]\(A ∪ B) g(x) = g2(x) , x ∈ B g 1 ( x ) , x ∈ A (see figure 14) FIGURE 14. Graph of g at c = 1 Then as in the earlier case, given ϵ > 0, f — g < ϵ. (1 — 4/7θ) ∈ Per3(g) since Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis ISSN: 1074-133X Vol 32 No. 5s (2025) 524 https://internationalpubls.com Hence the proposition. Corollary 1. Let f ∈ C(I). Then (i) Given ϵ > 0, there exists g ∈ P (I) such that |f — g| < ϵ and g/J ∈ PR(J) for some interval J c I. (ii) {g : I → I| given ϵ > 0, |f — g| < ϵ and g/J ∈ PR(J)} = |Fix(f )|. Proof. (i)Take J = [c,c+ 2θ] if c /= 1 [ 1-2θ, 1] if c = 1. g/J ∼= T/[0,1]. Therefore g ∈ PR(J). (ii) The cardinality of set of all g’s in Corollary (i) is the number of fixed points of f . Because at each fixed points of f we can construct g as above. Note: If h is a homeomorphism on I, then h ∈/ PR(I) as Per(h) = Per1(h) ∪ Per2(h). Here P (h) = {1, 2}. 3. CONCLUSION Studies of Periodically Rich maps on various topological spaces would contribute to literature of the chaotic dynamical systems.The set of periodic points is a critical con- cept in studying chaotic maps as it captures the recurrence and regularity in the otherwise seemingly erratic dynamics.The set of periods reflects the variety and richness of periodic behavior in chaotic systems, often being dense in natural numbers, indicating that the sys- tem exhibits periodic behavior at every scale. Acknowledgment: We gratefully acknowledge the administrative support, facilities and opportunities pro- vided by the management of Rajagiri School of Engineering & Technology, Kochi and IHRD, Kerala. REFERENCES [1] Luis Alseda, Jaume Llibre, and Michal Misiurewicz. Combinatorial dynamics and entropy in dimen- sion one, volume 5. World Scientific Publishing Company, 2000. Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis ISSN: 1074-133X Vol 32 No. 5s (2025) 525 https://internationalpubls.com [2] Detlef Bargmann and Walter Bergweiler. Periodic points and normal families. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 129(10):2881–2888, 2001. [3] Ethan M Coven and GA Hedlund. P¯ = R̄ for maps of the interval, 1980. [4] JP Delahaye. The set of periodic points. The American Mathematical Monthly, 88(9):646–651, 1981. [5] Robert L. Devaney. Dynamics of simple maps. chaos and fractals. In Proc. Symposia. Appl. Math., volume 39 of AMS Short Course Lecture Notes, pages 1–24, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1989. [6] Graham Everest, Alf J van der Poorten, Yash Puri, and Thomas B Ward. Integer sequences and periodic points. Journal of Integer Sequences [electronic only], 5(2):Art–02, 2002. [7] Zhaorong He, J. Li, and Zhongqiang Yang. The topological structure of function space of transitive maps. Topology and its Applications, 275:107009, 2020. [8] Tien-Yien Li and James A Yorke. Period three implies chaos. The American Mathematical Monthly, 82(10):985– 992, 1975. [9] Sylvie Ruette. Chaos on the Interval, volume 67. American Mathematical Soc., 2017. [10] A. N. Sharkovski˘ı. Coexistence of cycles of a continuous map of the line into itself(English version). International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 5(05):1263–1273, 1995. [11] Stephen Silverman. On maps with dense orbits and the definition of chaos. The Rocky Mountain Jour- nal of Mathematics, 22(1):353–375, 1992. [12] Michel Vellekoop and Raoul Berglund. On intervals, transitivity = chaos. The American Mathematical Monthly, 101(4):353–355, 1994.