Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis ISSN: 1074-133X Vol 32 No. 8s (2025) 130 https://internationalpubls.com Exploring the Mediating Role of Workplace Incivility in the Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence and Job Satisfaction Among Lebanese Nurses Suzan Al Kadi*1, Abdul Rahman Beydoun2 1PhD Student, Beirut Arab University, Lebanon.Mail: Suzaneel_kadi@hotmail.com 2Associate professor, Beirut Arab University, Lebanon.Mail: a.baydoun@bau.edu.lb Article History: Received: 25-10-2024 Revised: 18-11-2024 Accepted: 19-12-2024 Abstract: This paper looks at the mediating role of workplace incivility between the emotional intelligence of nurses’ in relation to job satisfaction. The sample used comprised of 415 nurses employed at hospitals in Lebanon. The results yielded a significant positive impact of that emotional intelligence on nurses’ satisfaction at the job. It has also shown that workplace incivility works as a negative mediator among satisfaction and EI skills. However, the limitation of a generalization is bound to registered Lebanese nurses working in hospitals. future studies should include other sample groups, like private/home nurses. This study builds on organizational behavior studies whiten an Eastern context by examining the workplace incivility’s mediating role, which was previously not widely tackled. It suggests that nurses’ job satisfaction is positively impacted by emotional Intelligence (EI). It also focuses on the workplace incivility’s partial negative mediation role. The results point out that medical centers will be able to increase job satisfaction through leveraging their employees’ EI. Keywords: Lebanon, Nurses, Emotional Intelligence, Workplace incivility, Job satisfaction. 1. Introduction Nurses significantly contribute to health interventions and improve health outcomes for individuals, their families, and communities. They play the lead role in providing and delivering healthcare (Budden et al., 2013; Alameddine et al., 2017). As such, having an adequate number of nurses is crucial to fortify health systems and grantee quality health coverage and services. Lebаnоn rаnks eighth lоwest in the Eаstern Mediterrаneаn Regiоn with regаrds tо nurse density, аnd аs suсh, is соnsidered tо hаve experienсed аn inсreаse in the migrаtiоn оf nursing skills due tо pооr retentiоn, lоw jоb sаtisfасtiоn, аnd high turnоver (Аlаmeddine et аl., 2017; Аlаmeddine et аl., 2019). Lebаnese Nurses have wоrked relentlessly аnd асted herоiсаlly within аn environment сhаrасterized by its extreme stress levels аnd difficulty (Dоumit, 2020). The level of elevated negativity the nurses are usually subjected to makes them in great need of а mechanism or approach that diminishes the levels of stress they have to а more tolerable one. According to Kheirmаnd et al., 2016; Rаkhshаni et аl. (2018), EI is among the several approaches that a person can adopt as an effective means to coop with such an elevated level of stress; additionally, Emotional Intelligence can be as a precautionary measure to counter such negativity levels. Therefore, emotional intelligence (EI) is a critical ability required for efficient service delivery among nurses, who are often at the frontline of service delivery at various health facilities (Lartey et al., 2021). In the dynamic and often high-pressure environment mailto:Suzaneel_kadi@hotmail.com mailto:a.baydoun@bau.edu.lb Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis ISSN: 1074-133X Vol 32 No. 8s (2025) 131 https://internationalpubls.com of healthcare, the well-being and job satisfaction of nurses are paramount. In nursing, incivility is one of the most conspicuous antisocial behaviors individuals face in their workplace (Khan et al., 2021). It is abundant in the modern workplace (Bunk & Magley, 2013). Incivility is characterized by rude, discourteous, belittling, and insulting behavior, which is believed to be a silent epidemic (Porath, 2016). In the healthcare industry, incivility behavior is pervasive in work settings and can spread in an entire work environment (Schilpzand et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2018). It can stem from colleagues, supervisors, or patients and their families, leading to a toxic work environment. Workplace incivility can erode job satisfaction by creating an environment of tension and mistrust. Employees who experience or witness incivility may feel undervalued and demoralized, which can diminish their motivation and engagement. Over time, this can reduce job satisfaction, adversely affecting individual employees and the organization (Parray et al., 2023; Singh, 2016). Such negative interactions can significantly impact a nurse's job satisfaction and mental health. The trends of incivility have been prevalent in the nursing profession and are associated with significant health, social, and organizational concerns that require attention (Berry et al., 2016; Casale, 2017; Christie & Jones, 2014; Embree & White, 2010; Holm et al., 2015). Despite the absence of apparent intent to harm, incivility may be detrimental to targets, witnesses, and co-workers, adversely impacting the organization if this behavior is not addressed (Pearson et al., 2001). Due to its low intensity, uncivil workplace behavior often goes unnoticed or is easily ignored; however, disregarding these tendencies allows incivility in the workplace to exacerbate more severe forms of workplace misbehavior (Loi et al., 2021). Ninety-three percent of nurses have reported witnessing incivility in the workplace. These workplace incivility experiences occur with greater frequency and intensity than civil interactions (Christie & Jones, 2014). Particularly in Lebanon, a country grappling with economic and social challenges, the nursing profession is crucial yet often underappreciated. Fоr Lebаnese nurses, wоrking соnditiоns аre nоt аt their оptimаl level eсоnоmiсаlly оr even in terms оf sаfety levels. The demаnding reаlity fасing the Lebаnese heаlthсаre prоfessiоnаls will mоst likely, in the lоng term, leаd tо psyсhоlоgiсаl symptоmаtоlоgy (Fаwаz & Sаmаhа, 2020) аnd give rise tо different negаtive соnsequenсes on their workplace behаviоr. According to what was presented earlier and to the observations of the associations between workplace incivility, emotional intelligence, and job satisfaction, it could be deduced that a gap in the literature which links emotional intelligence (EI) and job satisfaction to workplace incivility as a mediator, more specifically in the nursing industry. Understanding the factors influencing job satisfaction among Lebanese nurses can provide insights into improving their work conditions and, by extension, patient care quality. One significant study area is the interplay between emotional intelligence, workplace incivility, and job satisfaction. After conducting a literature review thought which it was undoubtedly established the existence of EI and workplace incivility among nurses in Lebanon. This paper aims to further lessen the gap in literature pertaining to the above-addressed topic. through the study, tackled both the theoretical and empirical aspects in a holistic model that includes the EI skills through which workplace incivility-job satisfaction relationship is enhanced among hospital nurses. This research aims are of twofold: to investigate the ways workplace incivility influences Lebanese nurses’ job satisfaction. And understand Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis ISSN: 1074-133X Vol 32 No. 8s (2025) 132 https://internationalpubls.com the mediating role of workplace incivility in the emotional intelligence and job satisfaction relationship? 2. Literature Review and Hypotheses Development 2.1 Emotional Intelligence Thorndike (1920) was the first to propose Emotional intelligence., Thorndike (1920) viewed intelligence as the total of three components: mechanical intelligence, abstract intelligence, and social intelligence; which he believed was essential to interactions and relationships among people. He established that an individual’s social intelligence was not linked to educational capabilities and is a major factor to achievements in the one’s daily life. Gardner (1993) has made a distinction between two forms of personal intelligence contained in “the social intelligence group “The first type, Interpersonal intelligence, is related to one ability to understand and work with others. Intrapersonal intelligence, the second type, is linked to one’s ability to portrait an accurate perception of his/her oneself and utilize it to successfully function in life’ different aspects. Interpersonal intelligence encompasses four distinct capabilities; namely, managing clusters, negotiating resolutions, establishing private ties, as well as participating in communal assessment. According to Goleman (1995), such abilities show ‘interpersonal polish’ and accelerate societal accomplishment. individual possessing such abilities are able to quickly establish good relationships, understand the feelings and reactions of others accurately. They can as such play a leading and organizing role including successfully managing conflicts. Emotional Intelligence was more explicitly described by Mayer and Salovey (1993). The authors suggested that EI encompasses both verbal as well as non-verbal evaluation and representation of feelings, emotional management, and solving problems by the use of emotions. Goleman (1995) developed the “emotional intelligence” term. Goleman (1995) deemed emotional intelligence (EI) as an essential component of an individual’s set of skill. EI comprises of five basic areas. The first, known to be the foundation of EI, is one’s capability to recognize one’s own feelings and constantly watch them. Emotion management, the second element, is connected a person’s capability to manage one’s feelings which improves self-awareness of the individual. The third factor, self-motivated emotional organizing, is applied to achieve ones a target. This component is vital to increasing an individual’s concentration; self-motivation mastery is equivalent to controlling both creativity as well as action. The fourth ability is connected to recognize the emotions of other people. The aptitude to be sympathetic is embedded in emotional self-awareness. The fifth component is a person’s capacity to be in a efficient correlation. This describes one’s ability to manage the emotions of those they interact with. At a later stage These five skills were decreased to the four known skills: social skills, self-management, self-awareness, social awareness, and (Goleman, 2001). The term self-awareness denotes one’s ability to recognizing his/her own internal state, preferences, and intuition (Easa, 2021; Zakariasen & Victoroff, 2012). This is indicative of the opportunity to utilize, learning, feeling, realizing, and managing sentiments. Self-awareness transcends awareness of one’s feelings; it is more connected to the utilizing such understanding to self-discovery (Dirette, 2010). Self-management is considered to be an individual’s ability to accommodate his/her conduct and sentiments in order to behave correctly in a given situations. (McPheat, 2019) As cited in Easa Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis ISSN: 1074-133X Vol 32 No. 8s (2025) 133 https://internationalpubls.com (2021), to that effect, self-management is when an individual takes ownership of his/her sentiments and the corresponding behaviors and decisions related to these emotions. Social awareness is associated with the ability to understand and manage the emotions of others (McPheat, 2019) as cited in Easa (2021). As such, a socially aware person recognizes his/her environment, as well as his/her capability of correctly decoding the set of sentiments those around him/her foster. Relationship management, also known as social skills, are competencies staff gain through interacting with others. Relationship management introduces approaches to connect with those around and individual, as such increases efficiency, strengthens relationships, and contributes to a staff member’s quality of life (Easa, 2021). 2.2 Job satisfaction As an academic concept, job satisfaction has aroused wide attention from the fields of management, social psychology, and practice in recent years (Zhu, 2012). The formal definition of job satisfaction can be traced back to the studies of Fisher and Hanna in 1931, in which they described it as a product of a non-regulatory mood tendency. As such, Jоb sаtisfасtiоn hаs ассepted tо be а set оf sturdy аnd hаrmоnized setups аt а wоrkplасe enсоmpаssing the physiоlоgiсаl, envirоnmentаl, аnd psyсhоlоgiсаl situаtiоns (Hоppосk, 1935). Jоb sаtisfасtiоn is dependent оn the pоsitive feelings оf the stаff pertаining tо their wоrk (Speсtоr, 1997), аnd hаs seen tо be the sensаtiоns experienсed by а persоn fоllоwing the асhievement оf а tаsk оr funсtiоn. This psyсhоlоgiсаl stаte оr mindset саn be either positive оr negаtive, аnd is аffeсted by the results оf the jоb соmpleted (Aziri, 2011). Job satisfaction among nurses is a critical factor that influences their well-being, performance, patient care quality, and retention rates. High job satisfaction is associated with reduced burnout, lower turnover rates, and better healthcare outcomes (Bartram et al., 2004) 2.3 Workplace Incivility Workplace incivility (WI) may be defined as “low-intensity deviant workplace behavior with an ambiguous intent to harm” (Schilpzand et al., (2016a); Adil et al., (2020)). Uncivil behaviors are characteristically rude and discourteous, displaying a lack of regard for others (Andersson & Pearson, 1999; Lanzo et al., 2015) In organizational behavior, workplace incivility has become a widespread concern with significant consequences for employee well-being and productivity. Research exploring the connection between emotional intelligence and workplace incivility has produced complex results, revealing direct and indirect effects. Some studies indicate that individuals with higher emotional intelligence are less likely to exhibit uncivil behaviors due to their ability to regulate emotions and communicate effectively in difficult situations (Loi et al., 2021). The authors emphasize the importance of emotional intelligence in workplace dynamics and highlight potential precursors to the harmful behaviors that contribute to workplace incivility. Ashraf and Khan (2014) found that the adverse effects of workplace incivility on doctors’ performance were less pronounced in those with high emotional intelligence than those with low emotional intelligence. However, these findings are consistent with those of Bibi et al. (2013), who also identified a significant relationship between emotional intelligence and workplace incivility. Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis ISSN: 1074-133X Vol 32 No. 8s (2025) 134 https://internationalpubls.com Majeed et al. (2021) argued that solid emotional intelligence moderates the connection between abusive supervision and workplace incivility. Based on the preceding arguments, the following hypothesis is posed: H1: Emotional intelligence negatively affects workplace incivility of Lebanese nurses Understanding the relationship between emotional intelligence and job satisfaction is crucial for organizations that foster positive work environments and enhance employee engagement (Rаmirez- Аsis et аl., 2021). Several theoretical frameworks underpin the relationship between emotional intelligence and job satisfaction. Empirical studies investigating the relationship between emotional intelligence and job satisfaction have yielded mixed findings, indicating direct and indirect effects. For instance, a meta-analysis by Miao et al. (2017) reported a significant positive correlation between emotional intelligence and job satisfaction, suggesting that individuals with higher emotional intelligence, specifically the first three skills, self-awareness, self-management, and social awareness, tend to experience greater job satisfaction. Similarly, a longitudinal study by Côté and Morgan (2002) found that emotional intelligence in general and self-management more precisely predicted subsequent job satisfaction among employees. In addition, Lan and Truinh (2021) reported a significant positive relationship between emotional intelligence and job satisfaction, suggesting that when the employees аre mоre self-аwаre, jоb sаtisfасtiоn inсreаses, thereby imprоving wоrk perfоrmаnсe. These results supported а сrоss-seсtiоnаl study by Sulemаn et al. (2020), reveаling а substаntiаl pоsitive relаtiоnship between self-аwаreness аnd jоb sаtisfасtiоn. The more the employees are self-aware, the more they show job satisfaction (Aznan et al., 2019). These results are congruent with Jung & Yооn (2016), who suggested that employee self-аwаreness аnd self-mаnаgement signifiсаntly pоsitively аffeсted jоb sаtisfасtiоn. The mоre the emplоyee is self-аwаre оf their emоtiоns аnd regulаtes them, the higher their jоb sаtisfасtiоn. Whereas on the other hand, surprisingly, а сrоss-seсtiоnаl study by Ghоreishi et аl. (2014) reported that there is no signifiсаnt аssосiаtiоn between emоtiоnаl intelligenсe аnd аll its sub-skills аnd jоb sаtisfасtiоn have found. This suggestion was also supported by Bаdаwy & Mаgdy (2015) emоtiоnаl intelligenсe in аll its fасets did nоt аffeсt jоb sаtisfасtiоn. Based on the preceding arguments, the following hypothesis is posed: H2: Emotional intelligence positively affects the job satisfaction of Lebanese nurses. Incivility in the workplace can have extensive consequences, impacting not only individual well-being but overall corporate productivity and performance. Job satisfaction, which reflects employees' overall perception of their job and work environment, is a critical factor that can adversely affect workplace incivility. Recent empirical research has provided compelling evidence of the negative influence that workplace incivility has on job satisfaction. Welbourne et al. (2016) found that employees who experience workplace incivility tend to have lower job satisfaction and a diminished sense of belonging. However, they also noted that the use of avoidant and religious coping strategies can alleviate this adverse effect. Sharma and Singh (2016) supported Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis ISSN: 1074-133X Vol 32 No. 8s (2025) 135 https://internationalpubls.com the notion of workplace incivility's unfavorable impact. In contrast, Cingoz and Kaplan (2015) argued that workplace incivility did not significantly affect job satisfaction. They attributed this finding to their sample, drawn from the private sector with relatively high earnings, where incivility may have less impact. Schilpzand et al. (2016) found that previous experiences of workplace incivility were negatively correlated with subsequent job satisfaction across various organizational contexts. Cortina et al. (2017) examined numerous studies and found a significant negative association between workplace incivility and job satisfaction, consistent across different populations and methodologies. Based on the preceding arguments, the following hypothesis is posed: H3: Workplace incivility negatively affects the job satisfaction of Lebanese nurses. 2.3.1 The Mediating Role of Workplace Incivility Workplace incivility has emerged within organizational behavior as a pervasive issue with far-reaching implications for employee well-being and productivity. Research examining the relationship between emotional intelligence and workplace incivility has yielded nuanced findings, highlighting both direct and indirect effects. Some studies suggest that individuals with higher levels of emotional intelligence are less likely to engage in uncivil behaviors as they possess the self-regulatory skills necessary to manage their emotions and communicate effectively in challenging situations (Loi et al., 2021). Likewise, workplace incivility is considered a source of work pressure. Therefore, Chen & Wang (2018) considered that emotional intelligence plays a buffering in this relationship. In such a way, the higher the emotional intelligence, the weaker the effect of workplace incivility on satisfaction is, and vice versa. According to the literature (Lopes et al. (2005); Brackett et al. (2006); Kafetsios (2004), people with high emotional intelligence are more prosocial, have better interpersonal relationships with their colleagues, and are emotionally close to each other. Therefore, in conflict situations, those persons are less likely to misunderstand the emotions of others and, as such, misinterpret them as threatening and intimidating, consequently decreasing the possibility of being a target of workplace incivility (Karim et al., 2015). Incivility can have far-reaching consequences, not only for individual well-being but also for organizational productivity and effectiveness. One crucial aspect affected by workplace incivility is job satisfaction, which reflects employees' overall evaluation of their job and work environment. Recent empirical research has provided compelling evidence of the adverse effects of workplace incivility on job satisfaction (Welbourne et al. (2016); Wang & Chih-Hung (2019); Guo & Kumar (2020)). Moreover, individuals who have difficulty understanding the perspectives of others are more likely to develop poor social skills and have difficulties with their peer relationships (Lomas et al., 2012; Karim et al., 2015). Thus, targets of uncivil behaviors have lower levels of emotional intelligence than nontargets and will tend to be seen as vulnerable by perpetrators. Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis ISSN: 1074-133X Vol 32 No. 8s (2025) 136 https://internationalpubls.com The combined observations of workplace incivility's association with emotional intelligence and work- related outcomes support the idea that workplace incivility perceptions might mediate the relation between emotional intelligence and work-related outcomes such as job satisfaction and commitment. Karim et al. (2015) explained in their research that workplace incivility plays a vital role in the relationship between emotional intelligence and job satisfaction. That is said, workplace incivility mediates this relationship; this mediation effect is explained by the assertion of MacCann et al. (2011) that highly emotionally intelligent individuals are better able to deal with stressful situations, which in turn will lead to better workout outcomes, such as job satisfaction. Understanding the link between workplace incivility and emotional intelligence and job satisfaction will help develop the interventions needed to mitigate the negative effect of workplace incivility on nurses' work. Knowing that the studies conducted on the mediating effect of workplace incivility between emotional intelligence and work-related outcomes such as job satisfaction are rare in the literature, and based on the above arguments, the following hypothesis is posed: H4: Workplace incivility mediates the relationship between emotional intelligence and job satisfaction of Lebanese nurses 2.4. Research Framework The literature on workplace incivility, emotional intelligence, and job satisfaction led us to develop the research framework depicted in Figure 1. Figure 2.1 Conceptual Framework Source: Developed by Loi et al. (2021) and adjusted by the researcher 2.5. Research Methods Data were collected randomly online via Google Forms to test the proposed hypotheses. The participants are the registered nurses currently working in Lebanese hospitals occupying different positions in the hospital, and the sample unit is the registered nurse who fills out the questionnaire and Emotional Intelligence Work place Incivility Job Satisfaction H2 H1 H3 Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis ISSN: 1074-133X Vol 32 No. 8s (2025) 137 https://internationalpubls.com assesses his/her emotional intelligence, workplace incivility, and job satisfaction related to it based on his/her subjective perceptions. In total, 415 usable questionnaires were returned. Demographically, 15.7 % of the respondents were male and 84.3 % female. 95.1 % of them were between 20 and 50 of age. As for experience, 79.5 % had a surplus of 5 years of experience within the field, and 20.9 % had less than 5 years of experience in the nursing sector. The study encompasses three dimensions. The dimensions include workplace incivility, emotional intelligence, and job satisfaction. Participants were asked to respond to the by rating each of the questions on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree). Emotional intelligence (EI) is evaluated through its four sub-components of EI: social awareness, self- management, self-awareness, and social skills; moreover, this study adopts the 16-item Assessing Emotions Scale (WLEIS,2004). Workplace incivility is measured by a construct with 17 items capturing workplace incivility (Kirk et al., 2009). A six items scale will be implemented to gage satisfaction. The replies will be counted through a 5-point Likert scale (Brayfield & Rothe, 1951) and checked by Curry et al. (1986). The construct’s validity and reliability exist in a similar paper (Andersen & Andersen, 2012). 3. RESULTS AND DATA ANALYSIS 3.1. Exploratory Factor Analysis Because of the study's vast number of questions (Banerjee & Chaudhuri, 2020) and large sample size, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was used to aggregate data. Prior to conducting any Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) study, it is critical to evaluate the correlations between variables using factor loadings between indicators and common factors (Byrne, 2016). EFA adequacy is a vital validation criterion (Hair et al., 2014), which requires adequate inter-item correlations to obtain a credible factoring solution. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure and Bartlett's sphericity test were used (Hair et al., 2014). This study's average KMO value was 0.819, more significant than 0.50. Furthermore, Bartlett's test of sphericity produced a chi-square value of 7605.416 with 460 degrees of freedom and a significant p- value less than 0.05, signaling that data are correlated adequately. 3.1.1 EFA Validity The literature distinguishes two types of validity components: convergent and discriminant validity (Watkins, 2018). SAWEI SMGEI SOWEI RMGEI WI SAT α 0.91 0.803 0.719 0.879 0.907 0.860 Table 1: EFA pattern matrix Convergent validity in Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) is determined by analyzing if items load substantially on a single primary factor with values larger than 0.5 or an average value of all item indicators greater than 0.60 (Gaskin, 2020) or 0.70 (Costello & Osborne, 2005). This study first assessed EFA convergent validity by guaranteeing significant correlations between each factor and its associated items, with loadings more than 0.50. Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis ISSN: 1074-133X Vol 32 No. 8s (2025) 138 https://internationalpubls.com Second, each variable was evaluated to determine whether it significantly affected a significant component in the pattern matrix. Third, the average factor loadings per factor were calculated, with results predicted to surpass 0.70. Table1 displays the EFA's convergent validity, demonstrating that loadings more prominent than 0.50 are strong on a significant factor and that the average loading per factor surpasses 0.70 with average values for SAWEI of 0.891, SMGEI 0.793, SOWEI 0.724, RMGEI 0.85, WI 0.775, SAT 0.768. EFA discriminant validity is tested by determining if variables load entirely on their factors without overlapping other factors. There are no cross-loadings between item factors or correlations. Thus, the discriminant validity is confirmed. Results are displayed in the EFA pattern matrix in Table 1 and the correlation matrix in Table 2. Pattern Matrixa Component 1 2 3 4 5 6 SAWEI1 .899 SAWEI2 .945 SAWEI3 .816 SAWEI4 .905 SMGEI5 .773 SMGEI6 .768 SMGEI7 .778 SMGEI8 .856 SOWEI9 .671 SOWEI10 .673 SOWEI11 .689 SOWEI12 .863 RMGEI13 .889 RMGEI14 .903 RMGEI15 .789 RMGEI16 .776 WI6 .714 WI7 .717 WI9 .763 WI12 .706 WI13 .889 WI14 .704 WI15 .901 WI16 .809 SAT1 .738 SAT2 .893 Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis ISSN: 1074-133X Vol 32 No. 8s (2025) 139 https://internationalpubls.com SAT4 .548 SAT5 .925 SAT6 .739 Table2: Correlation matrix Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. Rotation Method: Promax with Kaiser Normalization. a. Rotation converged in 6 iterations. Component 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 1.000 -.296 -.496 -.131 -.020 .022 2 -.296 1.000 .500 .269 .105 .259 3 -.496 .500 1.000 .184 .045 .097 4 -.131 .269 .184 1.000 .119 .155 5 -.020 .105 .045 .119 1.000 .005 6 .022 .259 .097 .155 .005 1.000 Table3: Component Correlation Matrix Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. Rotation Method: Promax with Kaiser Normalization. The correlation matrix reveals minimal high correlations between variables, with the highest correlation value of 0.500 inferior to the 0.85 threshold, indicating adequate discriminant validity. Both EFA convergent and discriminant validity values were considered acceptable for the analysis. 3.1.2 EFA Reliability The reliability of a factor is normally analyzed using internal consistency; this will assess inter-item correlations inside a construct (Treiman, 2014) and has been verified as part of the EFA assumptions. EFA reliability is also assessed using Cronbach's Alpha coefficient (Hair et al., 2014), with values less than 0.5 seen as unreliable, between 0.5 and 0.7 as mild, and greater than 0.7 as acceptable (Bryman & Bell, 2015). All latent variables with remaining items had values higher than 0.70, evidencing EFA reliability. The results are displayed in Table 4. SA WE I SM GEI SO WEI RM GEI WI SAT α 0.9 1 0.80 3 0.71 9 0.87 9 0.90 7 0.860 Table4: Result 3.1.3 CFA Common Method Bias (CMB) Two tests were run to identify potential technique bias in the dataset. First, Harman's single-factor test (Podsakoff, 2003) was used, which states that the explained variation by a single component should not be more than 50%. Second, the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) test was made using Kock's (2015) criterion, with a result larger than 3.3, which indicates bias. Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis ISSN: 1074-133X Vol 32 No. 8s (2025) 140 https://internationalpubls.com Harman’s single-factor test generated an explained variance value of 26.253 % < 50% when restricting all 6 factors into 1 factor, validating the absence of CMB issues in the findings. Additionally, the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) was examined if accounting for multicollinearity issues with values greater than 3.3 (Kock, 2015). Table5 displays the VIF values below the 3.3 thresholds, where all values were less than 1.3 < 3.3, indicating a model free of CMB Total Variance Explained Component Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative % 1 7.613 26.253 26.253 7.613 26.253 26.253 2 3.674 12.668 38.921 3 2.588 8.925 47.846 4 2.331 8.037 55.883 5 1.795 6.190 62.072 6 1.425 4.915 66.987 7 .952 3.282 70.270 8 .893 3.078 73.348 9 .747 2.574 75.922 10 .697 2.402 78.324 11 .615 2.119 80.443 12 .585 2.018 82.462 13 .548 1.891 84.353 14 .510 1.759 86.112 15 .496 1.709 87.820 16 .461 1.589 89.410 17 .401 1.384 90.794 18 .382 1.317 92.111 19 .337 1.161 93.272 20 .303 1.044 94.316 21 .293 1.011 95.327 22 .265 .915 96.243 23 .244 .843 97.085 24 .226 .780 97.866 25 .177 .609 98.475 26 .157 .542 99.017 27 .126 .435 99.452 28 .082 .283 99.735 29 .077 .265 100.000 Table5: VIF values Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis ISSN: 1074-133X Vol 32 No. 8s (2025) 141 https://internationalpubls.com 3.2 Hypothesis Testing Model 4 in Andrew Hayes’s PROCESS macro is used to test the hypothesis. It is a simple mediation model used to assess whether an independent variable (X) influences a dependent variable (Y) through a mediator (M) (Hayes, 2022). In this study, Y is SAT, X is EI, and M is WI Path a (EI →WI): R R-sq MSE F df1 df2 P .2176 .0474 .2762 20.5321 1.0000 413.000 .0000 Table 6 Coeff Se t P LLCI ULCI Constant 4.7209 .2197 21.4926 .000 4.2892 5.1527 EI_I =-.2669 .0589 -4.5312 .000 -.3827 -.1511 Table 7 Standardized coefficients: EI_I -.2176 The covariance matrix of regression parameter estimates: Constant EI_I Table 8 Constant .0482 -.0128 EI_I -.0128 .0035 Table7 summarizes the output of a linear regression model, (β0) = 4.7209; it represents the predicted value of the outcome variable (WI) when the predictor (EI) is 0; it is highly significant (p<.001). For EI, (β1) = -0.2669, for every one-unit increase in EI_I, the outcome (WI_I) decreases by 0.2669 units. This negative relationship is statistically significant (p<.001). Lower Limit (LLCI): -0.3827, Upper Limit (ULCI): -0.1511. These intervals do not include 0, confirming the significance of the EI_I coefficient. t-statistic for EI_I = -4.5312, p<.001p < .001p<.001 The t-value indicates a robust and significant relationship between EI_I and WI. As a result, emotional intelligence (EI) has a statistically significant negative effect on workplace incivility (WI). As such, H1 is supported. For the Path B (EI →SAT): R R-sq MSE F df1 df2 P .6161 .3795 125.9672 2.0000 412.000 .0000 Table 9 Coeff Se t P LLCI ULCI Constant 3.9374 .3924 10.0329 .000 3.1659 4.7088 EI_I .6022 .0741 8.1287 .000 .4566 .7478 Table 10: Output of a linear regression model Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis ISSN: 1074-133X Vol 32 No. 8s (2025) 142 https://internationalpubls.com Standardized coefficients: EI_I .3232 The covariance matrix of regression parameter estimates: Constant EI_I Constant .1540 -.0240 EI_I -.0240 .0055 Table 11 Based on Table9, R=0.6161 indicates a moderate positive correlation between emotional intelligence and job satisfaction. EI explains R2=0.3795, approximately 37.95% of the variance in SAT. This suggests that while EI is a significant predictor, other factors not included in the model also contribute to Job Satisfaction. F=125.9672, p<0.001p < 0.001p<0.001: The model as a whole is statistically significant, meaning EI_I reliably explain variance in SAT_T. Table 10 summarizes the output of a linear regression model, (β0) = 3.9374; it represents the predicted value of the outcome variable (SAT) when the predictor (EI) is 0; it is significant. For EI, (β1) = 0.3232, for every one-unit standard deviation increase in EI_I, the outcome (SAT) increases by 0.3232 units. This positive relationship is statistically significant (p<.001). Lower Limit (LLCI): 0.3827, Upper Limit (ULCI): 0.1511. These intervals do not include 0, confirming the significance of the EI_I coefficient. t-statistic for EI_I = 9.4883, p<..The t-value indicates a robust and significant relationship between EI_I and SAT. As a result, emotional intelligence (EI) has a statistically significant positive effect on job satisfaction (SAT). Nurses with higher EI tend to report greater satisfaction at work. As such, H2 is supported. For the Path C (WI → SAT): Outcome Variable (Y): SAT_T (Job Satisfaction). Predictors (X: WI) R R-sq MSE F df1 df2 P .61 61 .37 95 .4162 125. 9672 2.0 000 412. 000 .00 00 Table 12 Coeff Se t P LLCI ULCI Constant 3.9374 .39374 10.0329 .000 3.1659 4.7088 WI_I -.6969 .0604 -11.5373 .000 -.8156 -.5781 Table 13: Output of a linear regression model Constant .1540 -.0172 EI_I -.0172 .0036 Table 14 Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis ISSN: 1074-133X Vol 32 No. 8s (2025) 143 https://internationalpubls.com Based on Table12, R=0.6161 indicates a moderate positive correlation between workplace incivility and job satisfaction. WI explains R2=0.3795, approximately 37.95% of the variance in SAT. This suggests that while EI is a significant predictor, other factors not included in the model also contribute to Job Satisfaction. F=125.9672, p<0.001p < 0.001p<0.001: The model as a whole is statistically significant, meaning WI_I reliably explain variance in SAT_T. Table13 summarizes the output of a linear regression model, (β0) = 3.9374; it represents the predicted value of the outcome variable (SAT) when the predictor (WI) is 0; it is significant. For WI, (β1) = -0.4588, for every one-unit standard deviation increase in WI_I, the outcome (SAT) decreases by 0.4588 units. This positive relationship is statistically significant (p<.001). Lower Limit (LLCI): --0.8156, Upper Limit (ULCI): -0.5781. These intervals do not include 0, confirming the significance of the WI_I coefficient. t-statistic for WI_I = -11.5373, p<..The t-value indicates a strong, significant relationship between WI_I and SAT. As a result, workplace incivility (WI) has a statistically significant negative effect on job satisfaction (SAT). Nurses with higher WI tend to report lower satisfaction at work. A more hostile work environment reduces employee satisfaction significantly. As such, H3 is supported. For the indirect effect, the total effect of EI on SAT (c-path): effect Se t P LLCI ULCI C_cs .7882 .0831 9.4883 .000 .6249 .9515 .4231 Table 15 This represents the total effect of EI on SAT without considering the mediator (WI). The t-value equals 9.4883; p<0.001 indicates that the total effect is statistically significant. The confidence interval is [0.6249,0.9515], indicating that the total effect is positive and significant, as the interval does not include 0. The standardized coefficient (c_cs) is 0.4231, showing that the total effect, expressed in standard deviations, shows a moderate positive relationship between EI_I and SAT_T. For the direct effect of EI on WI (c’-path): effect Se t P LLCI ULCI C_cs .6022 .0741 8.1287 .000 .4566 .7478 .3232 Table 16 This represents the direct effect of (EI) on (Sat) after accounting for the mediator (WI). The t-value equals 8.1287; p<0.001 indicates that the direct effect is statistically significant. The confidence interval is [0.4566,0.7468], which indicates that the effect is positive and significant as the interval does not include 0. The standardized coefficient (c_cs) is 0.3232, showing that the total effect, expressed in standard deviations, shows a moderate positive relationship between EI_I and SAT_T. The indirect effect of EI on SAT via the mediation (WI) (ab- path) effect BootSe BootLLCI BootULCI WI_Imm .1860 .0515 .0905 .2947 Table 17 Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis ISSN: 1074-133X Vol 32 No. 8s (2025) 144 https://internationalpubls.com effect BootSe BootLLCI BootULCI WI_Imm .0998 .0255 .0501 .1505 Table 18 This represents the indirect effect of EI on SAT through WI, representing the portion of the total effect mediated by workplace incivility. The bootstrapping method was used with 5000 bootstrap samples at a 95% confidence interval. The mediation is statistically significant for the bootstrapped confidence interval [0.0905,0.2947] since the interval does not contain 0. The total effect of EI on SAT is strong and positive (0.7882), and the direct effect (0.6022) remains significant even after including workplace incivility. The indirect effect (0.1860) demonstrates that higher Emotional Intelligence reduces Workplace Incivility, increasing Job Satisfaction. Total effect= direct + indirect effect, 0.6022 + 0.1860 = 0.7882. Approximately 23.6% of the total effect is mediated by WI (0.1860/0.7882=0.236). At the same time, the other 76.4% is due to the direct effect. As such, H4 is supported. 4. DISCUSSION This study examines the direct consequence of EI on nurses’ workplace incivility in addition to their job satisfaction as well as the indirect effect of EI on job satisfaction through workplace incivility as a mediator. Results showed that emotional intelligence negatively affects nurses’ workplace incivility. This finding is congruent with prior literature by Loi et al. (2021); considering that emotional intelligence is an essential tool in dealing with workplace incivility, the authors assert the importance of emotional intelligence and its effect on workplace functioning and shed light on the possible precursors of the destructive behaviors that compromise workplace incivility. These results are consistent with Ashraf & Khan (2014), Bibi et al. (2013), Chen & Wang (2019). As expected, the research finding revealed that workplace incivility significantly negatively impacts job satisfaction. This outcome is consistent with the literature (Cingoz & Kaplan (2015); Sharma & Singh (2016); Welbourne et al. (2016)), which showed a negative relationship between workplace incivility and job satisfaction. The significant link reported in this research between workplace incivility and job satisfaction is consistent with diverse study findings. For instance, Schilpzand et al. (2016) considered that experienced workplace incivility was negatively associated with subsequent job satisfaction among employees in a variety of organizational contexts. Similarly, Cortina et al. (2017) confirmed a robust negative relationship between workplace incivility and job satisfaction. Results showed that emotional intelligence is positively affecting job satisfaction. As a result, it is congruent with prior results (Joseph & Newman, 2010; Côté & Miners, 2006; Miao et al. (2017)) which showed a positive relationship between emotional intelligence and job satisfaction. Contradicts Kim & Kim (2021) suggested that there is no significant relationship between emotional intelligence and job satisfaction, but an indirect effect through the mediator of learning ability. Finally, the finding indicated that workplace incivility partially and negatively mediated the relationship between emotional intelligence and job satisfaction. This result is in line with MacCann et al. (2011), who proposed the existence of mediation between emotional intelligence and job Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis ISSN: 1074-133X Vol 32 No. 8s (2025) 145 https://internationalpubls.com satisfaction; the assertion explains this mediation effect that highly emotionally intelligent individuals are better able to deal with stressful situations, which in turn will lead to better workout comes such as job satisfaction. Karim et al. (2015) explained in their research that workplace incivility is essential in the emotional intelligence job satisfaction relationship. Moreover, individuals who have difficulties understanding the perspectives of others are more likely to develop poor social skills and have difficulties with their peer relationships (Lomas et al., 2012; Karim et al., 2015). 4.1. Theoretical Implications This research examined Lebanese nurses' emotional intelligence toward workplace incivility and job satisfaction. Studying the identified gaps contributes significantly to the organizational behavior and management literature and advances our understanding of the complex dynamics between emotional intelligence (EI), workplace incivility, and job satisfaction within the nursing profession. Research on workplace incivility is still scarce, especially in the Middle East. This research advances prior research by offering empirical evidence through a framework based on antecedents. 4.2. Managerial Implications This research provided essential information for the healthcare sector. Given Lebanon's unique socio- political and economic challenges, these implications are particularly crucial for improving nurses' work environment and overall job satisfaction. It also provided insights to healthcare managers, leaders, and supervisors. The current research serves as a first step toward addressing elements that can benefit nurses in Lebanon. It demonstrates the negative influence of the EI construct in helping to mitigate the detrimental effect of workplace incivility. Workplace incivility can exacerbate already challenging working conditions in Lebanon, where the healthcare system faces numerous stressors, including high patient loads and limited resources. Addressing this issue is crucial for maintaining a respectful work environment and ensuring the overall well-being and job satisfaction of nurses. By implementing clear anti-incivility policies, providing conflict resolution training, and establishing support systems, healthcare organizations can mitigate the negative impacts of incivility, fostering a more positive and productive workplace. 4.3. Limitations and Future Research Though this research has important implications for theory and practice, it has several shortcomings that might be used as a basis for additional study. This study concentrates mainly on emotional intelligence as a construct; future research can be used to study the effect of each EI component separately. Furthermore, this study was to probe the workplace incivility mediating role. Future studies are suggested to include other moderators as well as mediators, like forgiveness climate and perceived organizational support, that could influence these relationships. References: [1] Adil, M. S., Hamid, K. B. A., & Waqas, M. (2020). Impact of perceived organisational support and workplace incivility on work engagement and creative work involvement: a moderating role of creative self- efficacy. International Journal of Management Practice, 13(2), 117-150 [2] Alameddine, M., Chamoun, N., Btaiche, R., El Arnaout, N., Richa, N., & Samaha-Nuwayhid, H. (2017). The workforce trends of nurses in lebanon (2009-2014). PLoS ONE, 12(8, Art. e0182312), 10-12:8, Art. e0182312<10. 10.1371/journal.pone.0182312 Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis ISSN: 1074-133X Vol 32 No. 8s (2025) 146 https://internationalpubls.com [3] Alameddine, M., Kharroubi, S. A., Dumit, N. Y., Kassas, S., Diab-El-Harake, M., & Richa, N. (2020). What made lebanese emigrant nurses leave and what would bring them back? A cross-sectional survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 103, 103497-11. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103497 [4] Andersen, I. A., & Andersen, J. R. (2012). validation of an instrument for measuring job satisfaction. norwegian journal of clinical nursing/sykepleien forskning, 7(4), 334-340. [5] Ashraf, F., & Khan, M. A. (2014). Does emotional intelligence moderate the relationship between workplace bullying and job performance?. Asian Business & Management, 13(2), 171-190. [6] Aziri, B. (2011). Job satisfaction: A literature review. Management Research and Practice, 3(4), 77. [7] Aznan,M., Kassim, A. F., Othman, N., Yusof, M. K., & Amir, N. H. (2019). The relationship between job satisfaction and social skill. Jurnal Intelek, 14(2), 251-256. 10.24191/ji.v14i2.258 [8] Badawy, T. A. E., & Magdy, M. M. (2015). Assessing the impact of emotional intelligence on job satisfaction: An empirical study on faculty members with respect to gender and age. International Business Research (Toronto), 8(3), 67. 10.5539/ibr.v8n3p67 [9] Banerjee, S., & Chaudhuri, B. R. (2020). Factors shaping attitude of voters about celebrity politicians: direct and indirect effects. Journal of Business Research, 109, 210- 220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jbusres.2019.12.009 [10] Bartram, T., Joiner, T. A., & Stanton, P. (2004). Factors affecting the job stress and job satisfaction of Australian nurses: implications for recruitment and retention. Contemporary nurse, 17(3), 293-304. [11] Berry, P. A., Gillespie, G. L., Fisher, B. S., Gormley, D., & Haynes, M. J. (2016). Psychological distress and workplace bullying among registered nurses. Online journal of issues in nursing, 21(3), 8 [12] Bibi, Z., Karim, J., & Din, S. (2013). Workplace incivility and counterproductive work behavior: Moderating role of emotional intelligence. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 28(2), 317-334 [13] Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., Shiffman, S., Lerner, N., & Salovey, P. (2006). Relating emotional abilities to social functioning: a comparison of self-report and performance measures of emotional intelligence. Journal of personality and social psychology, 91Bryman & Bell, 2015 [14] Brayfield, A. H., & Rothe, H. F. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35(5), 307– 311. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055617 [15] Bryman, A. and Bell, E. (2015) Business Research Methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford. [16] Budden, J. S., Zhong, E. H., Moulton, P., & Cimiotti, J. P. (2013). Highlights of the national workforce survey of registered nurses. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 4(2), 5-14. [17] Bunk, J. A., & Magley, V. J. (2013). The role of appraisals and emotions in understanding experiences of workplace incivility. Journal of occupational health psychology, 18(1), 87 [18] Byrne, M. (2016). Structural Equation Modelling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programing, 3rd edn, Routledge, New York [19] Casale, K. R. (2017). Exploring nurse faculty incivility and resonant leadership. Nursing education perspectives, 38(4), 177-181. [20] Chen, H. T., & Wang, C. H. (2019). Incivility, satisfaction and turnover intention of tourist hotel chefs: Moderating effects of emotional intelligence. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(5), 2034-2053 [21] Chen, H., & Wang, C. (2019). Incivility, satisfaction and turnover intention of tourist hotel chefs. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. [22] Christie, W., & Jones, S. (2014). Lateral violence in nursing and the theory of the nurse as wounded healer. Online journal of issues in Nursing, 19(1), 27-36 [23] Cingöz, A., & Kaplan, A. (2015). The effect of workplace incivility on job satisfaction and organizational trust: A study of industrial enterprises in Turkey. In WEI International Academic Conference Proceedings, Vienna, Austria (pp. 12-15). [24] Cortina, L. M., Kabat-Farr, D., Magley, V. J., & Nelson, K. (2017). Researching rudeness: The past, present, and future of the science of incivility. Journal of occupational health psychology, 22(3), 299 https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0055617 Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis ISSN: 1074-133X Vol 32 No. 8s (2025) 147 https://internationalpubls.com [25] Costello, A. B. & Osborne, J. W., (2005), Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis, Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10, (7). http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=10&n=7 [26] Côté, S., & Miners, C. T. (2006). Emotional intelligence, cognitive intelligence, and job performance. Administrative science quarterly, 51(1), 1-28 [27] Côté, S., & Morgan, L. M. (2002). A longitudinal analysis of the association between emotion regulation, job satisfaction, and intentions to quit. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 23(8), 947-962. [28] Curry, J. P., Wakefield, D. S., Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1986). On the causal ordering of job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Academy of management journal, 29(4), 847-858. [28] mDirette, D. (2010). Self-awareness enhancement through learning and function (SELF): A theoretically based guideline for practice. SAGE Publications. 10.4276/030802210X12759925544344 [29] Doumit, M.(2020).Healthcare heroes: Lebanese nurses experiences with COVID-19. Human & Health, 52 [30] Easa, N. (2021). Nurses’ emotional intelligence and stress at workplace during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from egypt. 10.21608 .90-57 ,(2)58 ,مجلة جامعة اإلسکندریة للعلوم اإلداریة/acj.2021.167930 [31] Embree, J. L., & White, A. H. (2010, July). Concept analysis: nurse‐to‐nurse lateral violence. In Nursing forum (Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 166-173). Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc. [32] Fawaz, M., & Samaha, A. (2020). The psychosocial effects of being quarantined following exposure to COVID-19: A qualitative study of lebanese health care workers. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 66(6), 560-565. 10.1177/0020764020932202 [33] Fisher, V. E., & Hanna, J. V. (1931). The dissatisfied worker. MacMillan Co. https://doi.org/10.1037/10719-000 [34] Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: A Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books. [35] Gaskin, J. E. (2020). Structural Equation Modeling. MyEducator. Retrieved [October 27, 2021], from https://app.myeducator.com/reader/web/1381b/ [36] Ghoreishi, F. S., Zahirrodine, A. R., Assarian, F., Moosavi, S. G. A., & Zare Zadeh Mehrizi, M. (2014). Evaluation of emotional intelligence and job satisfaction in employees of kashan hospitals. Nursing and Midwifery Studies, 3(1), e11977. 10.17795/nmsjournal11977 [37] Goleman, D. (2001). An EI – Based Theory of Performance. In Cherniss, C, & Goleman, D, (Eds). The Emotionally Intelligent Workplace. p:27 – 45. San Francisco, Jossey – Bass. [38] Goleman, D. P. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ for character, health and lifelong achievement. New York: Bantam Books [39] Guo, X. S., & Kumar, S. S. (2020). The effect of workplace incivility on organizational outcome (mediating role of psychological capital). African journal of business management, 14(4), 110-122. [40] Hair,F., Black, C., Babin, J., & Anderson, E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th edn, Pearson Eduaction Ltd, USA [41] Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (Vol. 3). The Guilford Press [42] Holm, K., Torkelson, E., & Bäckström, M. (2015). Models of workplace incivility: The relationships to instigated incivility and negative outcomes. BioMed research international, 2015(1), 920239. [43] Hoppock, R. (1935) Job Satisfaction. Harper, Oxford.Joseph, D. L., & Newman, D. A. (2010). Emotional intelligence: an integrative meta-analysis and cascading model. Journal of applied psychology, 95(1), [44] Jung, H. S., & Yoon, H. H. (2016). What does work meaning to hospitality employees? the effects of meaningful work on employees’ organizational commitment: The mediating role of job engagement. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 53, 59-68. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.12.004 [45] Kafetsios, K. (2004). Attachment and emotional intelligence abilities across the life course. Personality and individual Differences, 37(1), 129-145. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/10719-000 Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis ISSN: 1074-133X Vol 32 No. 8s (2025) 148 https://internationalpubls.com [46] Karim, J., Bibi, Z., Ur Rehman, S., & Khan, M. S. (2015). Emotional Intelligence and Perceived Work-related Outcomes: Mediating Role of Workplace Incivility Victimization. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 30(1). [47] Khan, M. S., Elahi, N. S., & Abid, G. (2021). Workplace incivility and job satisfaction: mediation of subjective well- being and moderation of forgiveness climate in health care sector. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 11(4), 1107-1119. [48] Kheirmand, M., kheirmand,f. & Pazhouhan, A. (2016). The relationship between emotional intelligence and occupational stress among nurses of alzahra hospital in isfahan. 59 ,(1)15 ,بیمارستان- 68. https://doaj.org/article/3730bfd92dfc4768a2bdeab6337c5749 [49] Kim, D. K., & Kim, B. Y. (2021). The effect of emotional intelligence on job satisfaction: A case study of sme management consultants in Korea. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(5), 1129-1138 [50] Kirk, B., Schutte, N., & Hine, D. (2009). The role of emotional self-efficacy, emotional intelligence, and affect in workplace incivility and workplace satisfaction. In E. J. Charmine, N. M. Härtel, W. J. Zerbe (Eds.), Emotions in groups, organizations and cultures (Research on emotion in organizations, (pp.211-225). New York, USA: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. [51] Kock, N. (2015). PLS-based SEM algorithms: The good neighbor assumption, collinearity, and nonlinearity. Information Management and Business Review, 7(2), 113-130 Lan, H., & Trinh, D. (2021). The effects of emotional intelligence on job satisfaction: A study of a vietnamese electronics company. IUP Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(1), 7-24. https://search.proquest.com/docview/2532201319 [52] Lanzo, L., Aziz, S., & Wuensch, K. (2016). Workaholism and incivility: Stress and psychological capital’s role. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 9(2), 165-183 [53] Lartey, J. K. S., Amponsah-Tawiah, K., & Osafo, J. (2021). Emotional intelligence and perceived organizational support as predictors of emotional exhaustion among nurses and midwives. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 14(3), 261-273. [54] Loi, N., Golledge, C., & Schutte, N. (2021). Negative affect as a mediator of the relationship between emotional intelligence and uncivil workplace behaviour among managers. Journal of Management Development, 40(1), 94-103 [55] Lomas, J., Stough, C., Hansen, K., & Downey, L. A. (2012). Brief report: Emotional intelligence, victimisation and bullying in adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 35(1), 207–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.03.002 [56] Lopes, P. N., Salovey, P., Coté, S., & Beers, M. (2005). Emotion regulation abilities and the quality of social interaction. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 5(1), 113–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.113 [57] MacCann, C., Fogarty, G. J., Zeidner, M., & Roberts, R. D. (2011). Coping mediates the relationship between emotional intelligence (EI) and academic achievement. Contemporary educational psychology, 36(1), 60-70. [58] Majeed, H. A., Jan, F. A., & Shah, F. A. (2021). Abusive supervision and workplace incivility in public sector hospitals in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa: does emotional intelligence matter?. The journal of contemporary issues in business and government, 27(6), 550-570. [59] Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1993). The intelligence of emotional intelligence. intelligence, 17(4), 433-442. [60] Miao, C., Humphrey, R. H., & Qian, S. (2017). A meta‐analysis of emotional intelligence and work attitudes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 90(2), 177-202. 10.1111/joop.12167 [61] Parray, Z. A., Islam, S. U., & Shah, T. A. (2023). Exploring the effect of workplace incivility on job outcomes: testing the mediating effect of emotional exhaustion. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 10(2), 161-179. [62] Pearson, Andersson & Porath, op. cit.; Pearson, C., Andersson, L., & Wegner, J. 2001. When workers flout convention: A preliminary study of workplace incivility. Human Relations, 54:1387–1419. [63] Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879 [64] Porath, C. (2016). The hidden toll of workplace incivility. McKinsey Quarterly. [65] Rakhshani, T., Motlagh, Z., Beigi, V., Rahimkhanli, M., & Rashki, M. (2018). The relationship between emotional intelligence and job stress among nurses in shiraz, iran. The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences : MJMS, 25(6), 100-109. 10.21315/mjms2018.25.6.10 https://doaj.org/article/3730bfd92dfc4768a2bdeab6337c5749 https://search.proquest.com/docview/2532201319 https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.03.002 Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis ISSN: 1074-133X Vol 32 No. 8s (2025) 149 https://internationalpubls.com [65] Rаmirez-Аsis, E., Osario, H.,Saenz-Rodrigues, R., Guerra-Munoz, M., Asnate-Salazr, E. & Alvarado-Tolentino, J. (2021)The effect of emotional intelligence on job satisfaction and organizational commitment: The case of educational sector. Nat. Volatiles& Essent.Oils, 8(4), 95-115 [66] Schilpzand, P., De Pater, I. E., & Erez, A. (2016). Workplace incivility: A review of the literature and agenda for future research. Journal of Organizational behavior, 37, S57-S88. [67] Sharma, N., & Singh, V. K. (2016). Effect of workplace incivility on job satisfaction and turnover intentions in India. South Asian Journal of Global Business Research, 5(2), 234-249. [68] Shi, Y., Guo, H., Zhang, S., Xie, F., Wang, J., Sun, Z., ... & Fan, L. (2018). Impact of workplace incivility against new nurses on job burn-out: a cross-sectional study in China. BMJ open, 8(4), e020461. [69] Singh, V. (2016). Employee empowerment and job satisfaction: An empirical study of manufacturing sector. International journal of business quantitative economics and applied management research, 2(9) [70] Spector, P. E. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, and consequences. Sage Publications, Inc. [71] Suleman, Q., Syed, M. A., Mahmood, Z., & Hussain, I. (2020). Correlating emotional intelligence with job satisfaction: Evidence from a cross-sectional study among secondary school heads in khyber pakhtunkhwa, pakistan. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 240. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00240 [72] Thorndike, E. L. (1920). A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4(1), 25-29. 10.1037/h0071663 [73] Treiman, D. J. (2014). Quantitative data analysis: Doing social research to test ideas. John Wiley & Sons. [74] Watkins, M. W. (2018). Exploratory factor analysis: A guide to best practice. Journal of BlackPsychology, 44(3), 219-246. [75] Welbourne, J. L., Gangadharan, A., & Esparza, C. A. (2016). Coping style and gender effects on attitudinal responses to incivility. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(3), 720-738 [76] Wong, C. S., & Law, K. S. (2002). Wong and law emotional intelligence scale. The leadership quarterly. [77] Zakariasen, K., & Zakariasen Victoroff, K. (2012). Leaders and emotional intelligence: A view from those who follow. Healthcare Management Forum, 25(2), 86-90. 10.1016/j.hcmf.2012.05.006 [78] Zhu, C. (2012). Student satisfaction, performance, and knowledge construction in online collaborative learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 127–136