CHAPTER 7                    An Imperfect Production and Repair Model……


Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 32 No. 9s (2025) 

 

787 

 
https://internationalpubls.com 

A Reverse Logistics Model for Green Products with Carbon Emission 

under Green Technology and Consumer Concern 

 

1Ashok Kumar, 2Jitendra Kumar, 3Arvind Kumar* 

1Department of Mathematics, Meerut College, Meerut; Email- drakkashyap@hotmail.com 

2Department of Mathematics, Marwari College, L.N. Mithila University, Darbhanga; Email- jitte.dm@gmail.com 

3Department of Mathematics, Meerut College, Meerut; Email- arvind.mcat@gmail.com 

 

Article History: 

Received: 12-11-2024 

Revised: 17-12-2024 

Accepted: 06-01-2025 

Abstract:  

In the prevailing global scenario, characterized by heightened carbon concerns and 

inadequate waste management, a systematic approach to product lifecycle 

management is essential. This proposed model tackles the challenge by methodically 

handling used products through collection, disassembly, and distribution based on 

their intrinsic value. With a primary focus on minimizing waste at the end of the cycle 

and considering carbon emissions, the model seamlessly integrates production and 

remanufacturing while accommodating fluctuating inflation rates over time. Crucially, 

it ensures that remanufactured items maintain parity with their original counterparts, 

accounting for the natural degradation of stored items. Numerical verification 

enhances the theoretical framework, providing a visual representation of anticipated 

results, and sensitivity analyses explore various parameters, contributing to a 

comprehensive understanding of the intricate dynamics between production, 

remanufacturing, and waste reduction. 

Keywords: Imperfect production, Time dependent demand, Reverse- Logistics, 

Inflation. 

 

1. Introduction 

In recent years, the imperative for sustainable business practices has become increasingly apparent, 

driven by growing awareness of environmental issues and a heightened sense of corporate 

responsibility. Central to this movement is the concept of reverse logistics, which encompasses the 

management of product returns and end-of-life disposal in a manner that minimizes waste and 

maximizes resource efficiency. Reverse logistics, a term subject to varying interpretations among 

scholars, as per Kokkinaki et al. (2001), encompasses all operations associated with the reuse, 

refurbishment, and recycling of products and materials. Reverse logistics refers to the process of 

managing the flow of products and materials backward through the supply chain, from the end 

consumer to the point of origin, for purposes such as recycling, refurbishment, or disposal. This 

aspect of supply chain management focuses on optimizing resource utilization, minimizing waste, 

and promoting sustainability by ensuring that products reach their maximum potential value before 

being discarded. Reverse logistics plays a crucial role in reducing the environmental impact of 

consumption by diverting items from landfills and facilitating their reuse or recycling. 



Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 32 No. 9s (2025) 

 

788 

 
https://internationalpubls.com 

Moreover, as companies strive to adopt greener practices, the consideration of carbon emissions has 

emerged as a critical factor in assessing the environmental impact of supply chain operations. Carbon 

emissions, largely stemming from industrial activities and transportation, contribute significantly to 

climate change and environmental degradation. Addressing carbon emissions requires the adoption of 

green technologies and sustainable practices throughout the supply chain. Green technology 

encompasses a range of innovative solutions aimed at reducing resource consumption, minimizing 

waste generation, and lowering carbon emissions. These technologies play a pivotal role in 

promoting environmental sustainability and mitigating the ecological footprint of business 

operations.  

In response to mounting environmental concerns, manufacturers and suppliers are increasingly 

investing in green technologies to develop eco-friendly products and optimize production processes. 

Green technology encompasses a range of innovations aimed at reducing resource consumption, 

minimizing waste generation, and lowering carbon emissions. These efforts align with consumer 

demand for sustainable products, driven by a heightened sense of environmental consciousness and a 

desire to support businesses that prioritize eco-friendliness. Consumer concern for the environment 

has catalyzed the emergence of green marketing strategies, which aim to promote the environmental 

benefits of products and encourage sustainable consumption habits. 

Against this backdrop, this study introduces a two-tier inventory model involving a manufacturer, a 

remanufacturer, and a supplier, with a focus on the production and distribution of green products. By 

analyzing price-sensitive demand patterns within this supply chain framework, the study seeks to 

elucidate optimal strategies for sustainable business operations. In doing so, it aims to contribute to 

the growing body of literature on reverse logistics, carbon emissions reduction, green technology 

adoption, and consumer-driven sustainability initiatives within the context of modern supply chain 

management. 

Schrady (1967) was the first to investigate remanufactured items and their stockpile in the 1960s. 

Based on the assumption of instantaneous repairs and manufacturing with no disposal costs, he 

developed an EOQ model for repairable items, considering a single batch of manufacturing and the 

creation of multiple repair systems. Goyal and Giri (2003) highlighted Richter's earlier work on a 

production-inventory problem, which theorized time-varying demands, productions, and degradations 

for a product. Teunter (2001, 2004), Inderfurth et al. (2005), and Dobos and Richter (2006) 

developed models considering the quality of returned items, exploring two collection management 

strategies: either buying used items back and reusing as much as possible or buying only a fraction 

back and determining the reusable quantity. In terms of quality, repaired products are inferior 

compared to remanufactured and reconditioned ones, as defined by King, Burgess, Ijomah, and 

McMahon (2006), who describe repair as addressing faults in a product. The paper discusses optimal 

production quantity, remanufacturing, and waste disposal when a manufacturer meets stationary 

demand with both manufactured and repaired products.  

Moreover, researchers have examined a production/recycling system with constant demand (El 

Saadany and Jaber, 2008). This system involves the constant production of a single batch of repair 

and original parts through non-instantaneous production and recycling. Rahbar and Wahid (2011) 

presented research on the effects of green marketing tools on consumer behavior. Singh and Saxena 



Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 32 No. 9s (2025) 

 

789 

 
https://internationalpubls.com 

(2013) introduced a closed-loop remanufacturing system for decaying items, considering a single 

item with two different quality standards in the model. During production, shortages and excess 

demand led to a backlog, and a model has been provided to estimate pricing, market coverage, and 

capacity based on the research by Yenipazarli and Vakharia (2015). Moghaddam (2015) developed a 

fuzzy multi-objective model to select suppliers and allocate orders within a reverse logistics system 

with uncertainty in supply and demand. This model proposes a continuous-review inventory model, 

as suggested by Malik and Sarkar (2018), incorporating uncertainties in demand, quality 

enhancements, setup cost savings, and lead-time variability control. Mashud et al. (2020) proposed 

the concept of a sustainable inventory based on imperfect products, depreciation, and controllable 

emissions. Using the remanufacturing/production cycle model, Saxena et al. (2020) developed a 

perspective on waste management through the selection of remanufacturing/production cycles in an 

alternative market. 

The proposed model for waste reduction and efficient product lifecycle management draws on a 

comprehensive literature review spanning various dimensions of sustainable and eco-efficient 

practices. Saxena et al. (2020) shed light on the selection of remanufacturing/production cycles in the 

context of an alternative market, emphasizing waste management in the Journal of Cleaner 

Production. Trochu et al. (2020) contribute a carbon-constrained stochastic model for eco-efficient 

reverse logistics network design under environmental regulations. An integrative inventory system 

incorporating degradation was published by Tyagi et al. (2020) where consumption is regarded as 

being price-based and production rate as being market-dependent.   

The rate of recovery is thought to be linearly time-sensitive in a framework developed by Handa et 

al. (2021) in which the end user receives repurchase goods.  Meng et al. (2021) present a pricing 

policy for dual-channel green supply chains, considering government subsidies. Mishra and Sarkar 

(2021) study the optimal inventory management strategy considering backorders and deterioration 

effects. Sarkar et al. (2021) explore the effects of carbon reduction and improved product quality on 

fixed life cycle products in sustainably managed supply chains. Kumar et al. (2021) present a fuzzy 

reverse logistics inventory model considering carbon emissions, while Motla et al. (2021) explore a 

fuzzy integrated inventory system with end-of-life treatment in the sports industry. Rana et al. (2021) 

investigate a growing items inventory model for carbon emissions, and Hashemi (2021) introduces a 

fuzzy multi-objective optimization model for sustainable reverse logistics network design An 

approach for degrading supplies was developed by Singh et al. (2022) based on the supposition that 

the deteriorating things have an optimal lifespan and that learning-forgetting has a direct effect on 

purchasing expenses. Yadav et al. (2022) examine an integrated model, recognizing that the profit of 

the centralized system grows due to the influence of learning-forgetting on its initial cost. Mondal et 

al. (2022) present the impact of deteriorating prevention technology and trapezoidal demand in 

Interval Uncertainty under Backlogging. Alamri et al. (2022) develop an ecologically objective 

quality model with carbon emissions and inflation resulting from deteriorating unreliable production 

processes. Sarkar et al. (2022) find the remanufacturing industry negatively impacting both the 

economy and the environment. Karim and Nakade (2022) conduct a literature review on the 

sustainable EPQ model, focusing on carbon emissions and product recycling. Bhardwaj et al. (2023) 

proposed a three-tier environmental distribution approach to inventory that takes into account stock-



Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 32 No. 9s (2025) 

 

790 

 
https://internationalpubls.com 

based demand, retailer-permitted shortages of goods, and emission levels in order to save crucial time 

and reduce comprehensive costs. Letunovska et al. (2023) delve into the effect of procurement 

sustainability on reverse logistics in Green Supply Chain Management. Saxena et al. (2023) 

contribute to the field with a reverse logistics model under the Stackelberg-Nash equilibrium and 

centralized framework, and further explore random misplacement and production process reliability 

as sustainable industrial approaches. Ullah (2023) investigates the impact of transportation and 

carbon emissions on reverse channel selection in closed-loop supply chain management. Motla et al. 

(2023) optimize inventory in a green environment with two warehouses, while Saxena et al. (2023) 

explore how the retailing industry decides the best replenishment strategy using technological 

support through blockchain. Moreover, Saxena et al. (2023) present a sustainable production model 

with stochastic machine breakdown using smart manufacturing under circular economy principles. 

The recent work by Saxena et al. (2024) investigates retail strategies for shelf-life products to satisfy 

consumers under game policy in the Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. This extensive 

body of literature provides a robust foundation for the proposed model, integrating insights from 

diverse studies focused on sustainability, waste reduction, and efficient production processes. Yang et 

al.'s (2024) article investigates how reverse logistics and sustainable supply chain initiatives impact 

sustainability performance in manufacturing, highlighting the moderating role of organizational 

learning capability. 

In this paper, we propose an integrated inventory model for green production/remanufacturing 

processes that incorporates GHG emissions and multivariate demand. Demand rate depends on price, 

green degree of the product and the consumer's concern toward green products. Production rate and 

remanufacturing is dependent on demand rate. The remaining portion of this paper is structured as 

follows. Section 2 of this chapter will identify the assumptions, notations, and description of the 

system that will be used to evaluate the production/remanufacturing inventory that will be discussed 

throughout. The mathematical modeling can be found in Section 3. Finally, the discussion of the 

results and the examples are listed in Section 4. At the end of this paper, the results and the examples 

summarise and conclude the paper. 

 

Figure 1: Material flow the closed loop supply chain system 



Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 32 No. 9s (2025) 

 

791 

 
https://internationalpubls.com 

2. Assumptions 

This section discusses the assumptions used throughout the paper. 

• The multivariate demand rate has been considered as𝐷(𝑝, 𝑗) = 𝑎 − 𝑝 + 𝑒𝑗where a is the 

potential market demand, p is the selling price, j is the consumer preference for the green product and 

e is the green degree of the product. 

• The production rate Pm = bD = 𝑏(𝑎 − 𝑝 + 𝑒𝑗)is demand dependent and 𝑃𝑚> D. 

• The remanufacturing rate Pr is also demand dependent i.e. 𝑃𝑟 = 𝑐(𝑎 − 𝑝 + 𝑒𝑗)and 𝑃𝑟> D. 

• The return rate of the used items, R, is proportional to the demand rate i.e.𝑅 = 𝑘𝐷,where 0 ≤

𝑘 ≤ 1. 

• Used items are collected and remanufactured as good as new ones.  

3. Notations: 

The following notations also need to be taken into consideration in order to create the model. 

CP the setup cost of the production run (cost/setup) 

CR the setup cost of the repair run (cost/setup) 

C1 the ordering cost of raw material 1 (cost/order) 

hP the inventory holding cost of finished items (cost/unit/time) 

hR the inventory holding cost of used items (cost/unit/time) 

h1 the inventory holding cost raw material 1 (cost/unit/time) 

r the inflation rate 

 the rate of imperfect production 

l inspection cost 

i remanufacturing cost 

q1 the quantity of raw material 1 required to produce one unit of the finished product. 

4. Mathematical Formulation  

The manufacturing of finished product from raw materials, it may be possible to reuse the collecting 

used products which are collected from the customers. The stock behaviour has been depicted in the 

figure 2 and the differential equations are as follows: 



Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 32 No. 9s (2025) 

 

792 

 
https://internationalpubls.com 

 

Figure 2: Status of inventory during the complete life cycle 

 

𝐼𝑅
′ (𝑡) = 𝑅,      0 ≤ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑡2     (1) 

𝐼𝑅
′ (𝑡) = 𝑅 − 𝑃𝑟     

2 3t t t       (2) 

𝐼𝑚
′ (𝑡) = (1 − 𝛿)𝑃𝑚 − 𝐷    0 ≤ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑡1     (3) 

𝐼𝑚
′ (𝑡) = −𝐷      𝑡1 ≤ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑡2     (4) 

𝐼𝑟
′(𝑡) = (1 − 𝛿)𝑃𝑟 − 𝐷    𝑡2 ≤ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑡3     (5) 

𝐼𝑟
′(𝑡) = −𝐷      𝑡3 ≤ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑇     (6) 

With boundary conditions 

𝐼𝑅(0) = 0, 𝐼𝑅(𝑡3) = 0, 𝐼𝑚(0) = 0, 𝐼𝑚(𝑡2) = 0, 𝐼r(𝑡2) = 0, 𝐼𝑟(T) = 0
 

Solutions of these equations are: 

𝐼𝑅(𝑡) = 𝑅𝑡,      0 ≤ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑡2     (7) 

𝐼𝑅(𝑡) = (𝑃𝑟 − 𝑅)(𝑡3 − 𝑡)    𝑡2 ≤ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑡3     (8) 

𝐼𝑚(𝑡) = {(1 − 𝛿)𝑃𝑚 − 𝐷}𝑡    0 ≤ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑡1     (9) 

𝐼𝑚(𝑡) = 𝐷(𝑡2 − 𝑡)     𝑡1 ≤ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑡2               (10) 

𝐼𝑟(𝑡) = {(1 − 𝛿)𝑃𝑟 − 𝐷}(𝑡 − 𝑡2)   𝑡2 ≤ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑡3    (11) 



Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 32 No. 9s (2025) 

 

793 

 
https://internationalpubls.com 

𝐼𝑟(𝑡) = 𝐷(𝑇 − 𝑡)     𝑡3 ≤ 𝑡 ≤ 𝑇    (12) 

 

Cost components 

Different costs are associated with the inventory management. These costs are calculated as below 

To accomplish the demand of the consumer the manufacturer need to purchase the raw material and 

produce the items. The purchasing and production cost of the system can be calculated as 

PC= (𝐶𝑃 + 𝐶𝑚)𝑃𝑚𝑡1 

R & D cost for green technology can be calculated as 

GTC =
1

2
𝐾𝑒2

 
Items are buyback from the consumer and the accusation cost of the used products can be 

calculated as 

AC = 𝐴𝑠𝑅𝑡3 

These returned items remanufactured and the cost of remanufacturing can be calculated as 

RC =𝐶𝑟𝑃𝑟(𝑡3 − 𝑡2) 

Thereafter they need to hold the inventory and the holding cost of the returned items can be 

calculated as 

𝐻𝑅 = ℎ𝑅 [∫ 𝐼𝑅(𝑡)𝑑𝑡

𝑡2

0

+ ∫ 𝐼𝑅(𝑡)𝑑𝑡

𝑡3

𝑡2

] 

= ℎ𝑅 {
𝑅𝑡2

2

2
+ (𝑃𝑟 − 𝑅)

(𝑡3 − 𝑡2)
2

2
} 

The holding cost of the manufactured items can be calculated as 

𝐻𝑚 = ℎ𝑚 [∫ 𝐼𝑚(𝑡)𝑑𝑡

𝑡1

0

+ ∫ 𝐼𝑚(𝑡)𝑑𝑡

𝑡2

𝑡1

] 

= ℎ𝑚 [{(1 − 𝛿)𝑃𝑚 − 𝐷}
𝑡1
2

2
+ 𝐷

(𝑡2 − 𝑡1)
2

2
] 

and the holding cost of the remanufactured items can be calculated as 

𝐻𝑟 = ℎ𝑟 [∫ 𝐼𝑟(𝑡)𝑑𝑡

𝑡3

𝑡2

+ ∫ 𝐼𝑟(𝑡)𝑑𝑡

𝑇

𝑡3

] 

= ℎ𝑟 [{(1 − 𝛿)𝑃𝑟 − 𝐷}
(𝑡3 − 𝑡2)

2

2
+ 𝐷

(𝑇 − 𝑡3)
2

2
] 



Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 32 No. 9s (2025) 

 

794 

 
https://internationalpubls.com 

Total holding cost of the system can be written as 

= ℎ𝑅 {
𝑅𝑡2

2

2
+ (𝑃𝑟 − 𝑅)

(𝑡3 − 𝑡2)
2

2
} + ℎ𝑚 [{(1 − 𝛿)𝑃𝑚 − 𝐷}

𝑡1
2

2
+ 𝐷

(𝑡2 − 𝑡1)
2

2
]

+ ℎ𝑟 [{(1 − 𝛿)𝑃𝑟 − 𝐷}
(𝑡3 − 𝑡2)

2

2
+ 𝐷

(𝑇 − 𝑡3)
2

2
] 

From continuity one can get 

𝑅𝑡2 = (𝑃𝑟 − 𝑅)(𝑡3 − 𝑡2) 

{(1 − 𝛿)𝑃𝑚 − 𝐷}𝑡1 = 𝐷(𝑡2 − 𝑡1) 

{(1 − 𝛿)𝑃𝑟 − 𝐷}(𝑡3 − 𝑡2) = 𝐷(𝑇 − 𝑡3) 

by which we get 

𝑡2 =
(1 − 𝛿)𝑃𝑚

𝐷
𝑡1 

𝑡3 =
𝑃𝑟

(𝑃𝑟 − 𝑅)

(1 − 𝛿)𝑃𝑚
𝐷

𝑡1 

𝑇 =
(1 − 𝛿)𝑃𝑟𝑡3 − {(1 − 𝛿)𝑃𝑟 − 𝐷}𝑡2

𝐷
 

 

Total Profitof the system can be written as 

=
1

T
[𝑝𝐷𝑇 − {(𝐶𝑃 + 𝐶𝑚)𝑃𝑚𝑡1 + 𝐴𝑠𝑅𝑡3 + 𝐶𝑟𝑃𝑟(𝑡3 − 𝑡2) +

1

2
𝐾𝑒2 + ℎ𝑅 {

𝑅𝑡2
2

2
+ (𝑃𝑟 − 𝑅)

(𝑡3−𝑡2)
2

2
} +

ℎ𝑚 [{(1 − 𝛿)𝑃𝑚 − 𝐷}
𝑡1
2

2
+ 𝐷

(𝑡2−𝑡1)
2

2
] + ℎ𝑟 [{(1 − 𝛿)𝑃𝑟 − 𝐷}

(𝑡3−𝑡2)
2

2
+ 𝐷

(𝑇−𝑡3)
2

2
]}]                (13) 

Here the profit function is the function of the variable 𝑡1, 𝑡2, 𝑡3 and T but by using the continuity one 

can observe that the value of 𝑡2, 𝑡3 and T depends on the parameter 𝑡1 therefore the profit has only 

one decision variable 𝑡1. To maximize total average profit per unit time (TP), the optimal values of 

𝑡1can be obtained by solving the equation 
𝜕𝑇𝑃

𝜕𝑡1
= 0 

The convexity of the function can be ensured by the condition as below 

𝜕2𝑇𝑃

𝜕𝑡1
2 < 0 

5. Numerical Example 

The provide model has been illustrated through the following numerical with suitable input 

parameters. To check the validity of the model, values of the parameters have been chosen from the 

previous studies. 

 

 



Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 32 No. 9s (2025) 

 

795 

 
https://internationalpubls.com 

Table 1: Input values of the Parameters 

Parameters Input Values Parameters Input Values 

𝑐𝑚 $20 per unit item 𝑘 2 

𝑐𝑃 $50 per unit item 𝑗 1 

𝛿 0.05 𝑒 250 

𝐴𝑠 $10 per unit item 𝑎 1000 

𝑐𝑟 $45 per unit item 𝑝 $100 

ℎ𝑅 $1.5 per unit per unit item 𝑏 1.25 

ℎ𝑚 $1.5 per unit per unit item 𝑐 1.2 

ℎ𝑟 $1.25 per unit per unit item 𝑅 750 

 

Table 2: Optimal values of decision parameters and total profit 

t1* t2* t3* T* TP 

5.38 6.39 13.99 15.06 32418.1 

 

 

 

Figure 3: Concave Nature of Total profit w.r.t t1 

5.Sensitivity Analysis 

A sensitivity analysis with respect to different associated parameters is carried out to observe the 

change in the profit function with the change in these parameters. 

 

4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0

32100

32200

32300

32400

To
ta

l P
ro

fi
t 



Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 32 No. 9s (2025) 

 

796 

 
https://internationalpubls.com 

Table 3: effect of variation of different parameter on the optimum results 

Parameter Change in 

Parameter 

t1* TC* 

Δ 0.025 5.15 34403.51 

0.045 5.23 33622.1 

0.055 5.33 32823.8 

0.065 5.43 32007.9 

K 

 

1 3.81 34849.2 

1.5 4.65 33530.1 

2.5 6.01 31438.5 

3 6.58 30552.8 

j 
 

0.5 4.94 29685.4 

0.75 5.18 31037.5 

1.25 5.54 33822.7 

1.5 5.68 35245.9 

e 

 

150 3.02 33339.9 

200 4.18 32922.9 

300 6.61 31834.6 

350 7.88 31179.7 

A 900 5.04 30222.4 

950 5.22 31311.5 

1050 5.51 33539.5 

1100 5.63 34673. 
p 

 

90 5.41 21041. 
95 5.39 26754.6 

105 5.37 38031.7 

110 5.35 43595.5 

b 

 

1.1 6.32 32691.1 

1.2 5.66 32500.5 

1.3 5.12 32342.7 

1.4 4.68 32209.8 

c 
 

1.1 5.28 33316.1 

1.15 5.32 32828.9 

1.25 5.17 31988.6 

1.3 5.21 31681.98 

R 600 6.65 30321.8 

700 5.78 31699.1 

800 4.98 33157.2 

900 4.22 34697.3 

 

 



Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 32 No. 9s (2025) 

 

797 

 
https://internationalpubls.com 

6.Observations 

1. From the table 1, one can see how the profit function changes as the value of demand 

parameter a varies, one can see that as the a slight increment in the value of demand parameter a 

resulted in the moderate increment in the production period while profit of the model is generally 

positive in response to a change in the demand parameter. 

2. It is observed that the profit function is slightly negative sensitive to the change in the 

production parameter while the production period is highly negative sensitive to the change in the 

parameter b, which is quite obvious because if the rate of production will be high, we need less time 

to produce the material.   

3. Similar results evident by the sensitivity of the remanufacturing parameter c. it is observed 

that the increment in the remanufacturing parameter resulted in slightly reduction in the production 

period while a moderate reduction in the profit function. 

4. It is noticed that a slight increment in the return rate cause a great reduction in the product 

period because greater return resulted in more remanufacturing and less production, consequently a 

huge increment in the profit.  

5. Results revel that that a positive variation in price can cause a reduction in total demand, 

consequently less production therefore a slight reduction in the production period however a slight 

increment in the price can resulted in a huge increment in the profit. 

6. It is noticed that the profit function is highly negative proportional to the change in the 𝛿, 𝑘 

and 𝑒 green coefficient while highly positive sensitive for the consumer concern𝑗 

6. Conclusion 

The presented model offers a nuanced perspective on the reverse logistics system, explicitly 

incorporating green products and consumer concerns. This innovative approach involves the 

collection and remanufacturing of used items alongside the production of new ones, with a dedicated 

focus on integrating green technology. Throughout the production process, careful consideration of 

consumer concerns regarding environmentally friendly practices has been maintained. The demand 

rate is intricately linked to price, green technology, and consumer concerns, highlighting the 

interdisciplinary nature of the model. 

A distinctive contribution of this research lies in its comprehensive exploration of the reverse 

logistics system, specifically addressing the integration of green products and consumer sentiments. 

By incorporating green technology into the production process, the study offers insights into the 

intricate dynamics between consumer concerns, green coefficients, and the resulting profit function. 

The identification of parameters influencing the system's profitability contributes valuable knowledge 

to the evolving field of sustainable supply chain management. 

While this research makes significant strides, it is essential to acknowledge certain limitations. The 

study focuses primarily on green coefficients, consumer concern, and pricing, potentially overlooking 

other influential factors. Additionally, the model assumes a simplified environment, neglecting the 

complexities introduced by external variables such as inflation and trade credit. These limitations 

underscore the need for cautious interpretation and highlight avenues for future refinement. 



Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 32 No. 9s (2025) 

 

798 

 
https://internationalpubls.com 

To advance the understanding of the reverse logistics system and enhance the model's applicability, 

future research should delve into the integration of additional parameters. Exploring the impact of 

inflation and trade credit could provide a more realistic representation of the system's dynamics. 

Furthermore, a deeper investigation into the interplay of various factors affecting consumer concern 

and its subsequent influence on the effectiveness of green technology integration is warranted. This 

expanded scope would contribute to a more comprehensive and robust understanding of sustainable 

inventory control systems, aligning with the evolving landscape of environmentally conscious supply 

chain management. 

References 

1. Alamri, O. A., Jayaswal, M. K., Khan, F. A., & Mittal, M. (2022). An EOQ Model with Carbon 

Emissions and Inflation for Deteriorating Imperfect Quality Items under Learning Effect. 

Sustainability, 14(3), 1365.  

2. Bhardwaj, V., Kumar, S., & Tyagi, V. K. (2023, December). A Green Inventory Model for New 

and Revamped Decaying Products with Partially Backlogged and Stock Dependent Demand. In 

International Conference on Soft Computing: Theories and Applications (pp. 401-411). 

Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. 

3. Brindley, C. &Oxborrow, L. (2014). Aligning the sustainable supply chain to green marketing 

needs: A case study. Ind. Mark. Manag. 43, 45–55. 

4. Dobos, I., & Richter, K. (2006). “A production/recycling model with quality considerations”. 

International Journal of Production Economics, 104(2), 571–579. 

5. El Saadany, A. M. A., &Jaber, M. Y. (2008). “The EOQ repair and waste disposal model with 

switching costs”. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 55(1), 219–233. 

6. Goyal, S. K. & Giri, B. C. (2003). The production-inventory problem of a product with time 

varying demand, production and deterioration rates. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 147, 549–557. 

7. Handa, N., Kumar, S., & Kumar, J. (2021). Development of a closed-loop supply chain system 

with exponential demand and multivariate production/remanufacturing rates for deteriorated 

products. Materials Today: Proceedings, 47, 2560-2564. 

8. Hashemi, S. E. (2021). A fuzzy multi-objective optimization model for a sustainable reverse 

logistics network design of municipal waste-collecting considering the reduction of 

emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 318, 128577. 

9. Inderfurth, K., Lindner, G., & Rachaniotis, N. P. (2005). “Lot sizing in a production system with 

rework and product deterioration”. International Journal of Production Research, 43(7), 1355–

1374. 

10. Jaber, M. Y., & Rosen, M. A. (2008). “The economic order quantity repair and waste disposal 

model with entropy cost”. European Journal of Operational Research, 188(1), 109–120. 

11. Karim, R., & Nakade, K. (2022). A literature review on the sustainable EPQ model, focusing on 

carbon emissions and product recycling. Logistics, 6(3), 55. 

12. King, A. M., Burgess, S. C., Ijomah, W., & McMahon, C. A. (2006). Reducing waste: Repair, 

recondition, remanufacture or recycle? Sustainable Development, 14(4), 257–267. 



Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 32 No. 9s (2025) 

 

799 

 
https://internationalpubls.com 

13. Kokkinaki, A., Dekker, R., de Koster, R., &Pappis, C. (2001). From e-trash to e-treasure: how 

value can be created by the new e-business models for reverse logistics (No. EI 2000-32/A). 

14. Kumar, S., Sarkar, B., & Kumar, A. (2021). Fuzzy reverse logistics inventory model of smart 

items with two warehouses of a retailer considering carbon emissions. RAIRO-Operations 

Research, 55(4), 2285-2307. 

15. Letunovska, N., Offei, F. A., Junior, P. A., Lyulyov, O., Pimonenko, T., &Kwilinski, A. (2023). 

Green Supply Chain Management: The Effect of Procurement Sustainability on Reverse 

Logistics. Logistics, 7(3), 47. 

16. Malik, A. I., &Sarkar, B. (2018). Optimizing a multi-product continuous-review inventory model 

with uncertain demand, quality improvement, and setup cost reduction and variation control in 

lead time. IEEE Access, 6, 36176-36187. 

17. Mashud, A. H. M., Roy, D., Daryanto, Y. & Ali, M. H. A sustainable inventory model with 

imperfect products, deterioration, and controllable emissions. Mathematics 8, 1–21 (2020). 

18. Meng, Q., Li, M., Liu, W., Li, Z. & Zhang, J. (2021).Pricing policies of dual-channel green 

supply chain: Considering government subsidies and consumers’ dual preferences. Sustain. 

Prod. Consum. 26, 1021–1030. 

19. Mishra, U., Wu, J. Z., &Sarkar, B. (2021). Optimum sustainable inventory management with 

backorder and deterioration under controllable carbon emissions. Journal of Cleaner 

Production, 279, 123699. 

20. Moghaddam, K. S. (2015). Fuzzy multi-objective model for supplier selection and order 

allocation in reverse logistics systems under supply and demand uncertainty. Expert Syst. Appl. 

42, 6237–6254. 

21. Mondal, R., Shaikh, A. A., Bhunia, A. K., Hezam, I. M., & Chakrabortty, R. K. (2022). Impact 

of Trapezoidal Demand and Deteriorating Preventing Technology in an Inventory Model in 

Interval Uncertainty under Backlogging Situation. Mathematics, 10(1), 78. 

22. Motla, R., Kumar, A., Saxena, N., & Sana, S. S. (2023). Inventory optimization in a green 

environment with two warehouses. Innovation and Green Development, 2(4), 100087. 

23. Motla, R., Kumar, A., Singh, S. R., & Saxena, N. (2021). A fuzzy integrated inventory system 

with end of life treatment: A possibility in sports industry. Opsearch, 1-20. 

24. Pal, B. & Sarkar, A.(2021). Optimal strategies of a dual-channel green supply chain with 

recycling under retailer promotional effort. RAIRO - Oper. Res. 55, 415–431. 

25. Rahbar, E. & Wahid, N. A.(2011). Investigation of green marketing tools’ effect on consumers’ 

purchases behavior. Bus. Strateg. Ser. 12, 73–83. 

26. Rana, K., Singh, S. R., Saxena, N., & Sana, S. S. (2021). Growing items inventory model for 

carbon emission under the permissible delay in payment with partially backlogging. Green 

Finance, 3(2), 153-174. 

27. Sarkar, B., Sarkar, M., Ganguly, B., & Cárdenas-Barrón, L. E. (2021). Combined effects of 

carbon emission and production quality improvement for fixed lifetime products in a sustainable 

supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics, 231, 107867. 



Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 32 No. 9s (2025) 

 

800 

 
https://internationalpubls.com 

28. Sarkar, B., Ullah, M., &Sarkar, M. (2022). Environmental and economic sustainability through 

innovative green products by remanufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 332, 129813. 

29. Saxena, N., & Sarkar, B. (2023a). How does the retailing industry decide the best replenishment 

strategy by utilizing technological support through blockchain?. Journal of Retailing and 

Consumer Services, 71, 103151. 

30. Saxena, N., & Sarkar, B. (2023b). Random misplacement and production process reliability: A 

sustainable industrial approach to deal with the discrepancy and deficiency. Journal of Industrial 

& Management Optimization, 19(7). 

31. Saxena, N., Kumar, J., & Sana, S. S. (2023). Sustainable production model with stochastic 

machine breakdown using smart manufacturing under circular economy. Green Finance, 5(4), 

479-511. 

32. Saxena, N., Sarkar, B., & Singh, S. R. (2020). Selection of remanufacturing/production cycles 

with an alternative market: A perspective on waste management. Journal of Cleaner 

Production, 245, 118935. 

33. Saxena, N., Sarkar, B., Wee, H. M., Reong, S., Singh, S. R., & Hsiao, Y. L. (2023). A reverse 

logistics model with eco-design under the Stackelberg-Nash equilibrium and centralized 

framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 387, 135789. 

34. Saxena, N., Kumar, J., Mishra, U., Sarkar, B., & Kumar, K. (2024). Deterioration and age 

governed greenhouse gas emission from the product itself: An optimum inventory control 

problem. RAIRO - Operations Research, 58, 2591-2620. 

35. Schrady, D. A. (1967). A Deterministic Inventory model for repairable items. Naval Research 

Logistics Quarterly, 14(3), 391–398. 

36. Singh, M., Tyagi, V. K., Goel, R., & Kumar, S. (2022). The effect of lifetime on learning and 

forgetting in a supply chain inventory model with a service level constraint. Materials Today: 

Proceedings, 51, 201-206. 

37. Teunter, R. (2004). Lot-sizing for inventory systems with product recovery. Computers & 

Industrial Engineering, 46(3), 431-441. 

38. Teunter, R. H. (2001). Economic ordering quantities for recoverable item inventory 

systems. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 48(6), 484-495. 

39. Trochu, J., Chaabane, A., & Ouhimmou, M. (2020). A carbon-constrained stochastic model for 

eco-efficient reverse logistics network design under environmental regulations in the CRD 

industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118818. 

40. Tyagi, V. K., Goel, R., Singh, M., & Kumar, S. (2020). Modeling and analysis of a closed loop 

supply chain with uncertain lead time in the perspective of inventory management. Int J Sci 

Technol Res. 

41. Ullah, M. (2023). Impact of transportation and carbon emissions on reverse channel selection in 

closed-loop supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 394, 136370. 



Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 32 No. 9s (2025) 

 

801 

 
https://internationalpubls.com 

42. Yadav, D., Singh, S. R., Kumar, S., & Cárdenas-Barrón, L. E. (2022). Manufacturer-retailer 

integrated inventory model with controllable lead time and service level constraint under the 

effect of learning-forgetting in setup cost. Scientia Iranica, 29(2), 800-815. 

43. Yang, K., Thoo, A. C., AbTalib, M. S., & Huam, H. T. (2024). How reverse logistics and 

sustainable supply chain initiatives influence sustainability performance: the moderating role of 

organisational learning capability. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 35(1), 

141-163. 

44. Yenipazarli, A. & Vakharia, A.(2015). Pricing, market coverage and capacity: Can green and 

brown products co-exist? Eur. J. Oper. Res. 242, 304–315. 

45. Zhang, X., Xiu, G., Shahzad, F. &Duan, Y.(2021). Optimal financing strategy in a capital-

constrained supply chain with retailer green marketing efforts. Sustain. 13, 1–19.