Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 31 No. 1 (2024) 

 

 
266 

https://internationalpubls.com 

Numerical Exploration and Statistical Analysis of Mathematical 

Parameters of Anti Reflecting Coating on Operational Parameters 

Improvement of Solar Cell 
 

Dr. Sunil Kumar Gupta1 Dr. Babita Jain2, Ashish Raj3, Dr. Sunil Kumar Chaudhary4, Vineeta 

Chauhan5 

Professor, Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering, Poornima University, Jaipur, India1 

Professor, Navkis College of Engineering, Hassan (NCEH)2

Associate Professor, Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Poornima University, Jaipur, India3 

Professor, Department of Electrical Engineering, Galgotia College of Engineering (GCET), Greater Noida, U.P4 

Assistant Professor Indus University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat5 

 

Article History: 

Received: 26-10-2023 

Revised: 15-12-2023 

Accepted: 26-12-2023 

Abstract: 

In this research, a detailed abacus adventure and statistic obsession are made to survey 

the relation of fractions of materials of the anti-reflective coating to effectiveness of a 

solar cell. Emphasis on the study of whether single or double-layer layers of coatings 

save energy reflection and improve absorption is done leading to energy conservation. 

The anti-reflective coating is a familiar term in the solar technology, as it is less realistic 

without the coating that minimizes the light reflection losses. By way of single or 

double coating, light transmission increased is by limiting reflection therefore making 

the surfaces of solar cells to receive more light improving efficiency. These finer details 

of the coating's power over the solar cells' light absorption depth and output 

effectiveness are thoughtfully and minutely deliberated. A great deal of numerical 

methods are used to model light and sunlight impinging on the coated solar cell 

environments. Light waves' behaviour, when meet an antireflection layer, is a very 

important aspect in explaining, to some extent, about the thickness of the layer and its 

materials composition. That is a great role, namely, statistical techniques in this study 

whose purpose is used to main performance gain in the solar cells. Through simulation 

and experimental data, correlations are established between solar cell performance and 

the coating’s parameters. The patterns found will be taken into consideration to further 

improve the coating. This research, not just performed steps by step analysis of 

reflection, absorption and power conversion features in solar cells coated; rather, 

guidelines to excellent anti-reflective coating were offered too. The clarification of 

complex connections between the performance of coating construction and solar cells 

performance is enabled in this research and its results significantly contribute towards 

the development of renewable energy engineering, hence giving the research a certain 

weight in the field of solar energy. 

Keywords: Numerical Exploration, Statistical Analysis, Mathematical Parameters, 

Anti-Reflective Coating, Solar Cells, Operational Improvement, Single-Layer Coating, 

Double-Layer Coating, Light Reflection, Energy Loss, Efficiency Enhancement, Light 

Absorption, Power Output, Numerical Methods, Simulation, Light Interaction, 

Optimal Thickness, Material Composition, Energy Conversion Efficiency, 

Performance Quantification, Data Analysis. 

 

 



Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 31 No. 1 (2024) 

 

 
267 

https://internationalpubls.com 

I. INTRODUCTION 

Over 30% of the surface of bare silicon is reflective. Anti-reflection coatings (ARC) and surface 

texturing both help to minimize reflection. Solar cell anti-reflection coatings are comparable to those 

used on other optical devices like camera lenses [1-6]. They are made up of a thin layer of dielectric 

material that has been purposefully chosen at a thickness such that interference effects in the coating 

result in an out-of-phase reflection of the wave from the top surface of the anti-reflection coating 

compared to the wave reflected from the semiconductor surfaces [6-15,17-22]. There is no net reflected 

energy as a result of the destructive interference between these out-of-phase reflected waves. 

Interference effects, which also frequently occur when a thin layer of oil on water forms rainbow-like 

bands of color, are another type of coating in addition to anti-reflection coatings as sunlight hits the 

solar cell's front, incident energy from the surface is transported into the solar cell and converted into 

electricity. The reflectivity of the bare silicone surface is usually very high [16-30]. It is possible to 

reflect more than 30% of the incident sunlight. The following method is commonly used to reduce 

solar cell surface reflecting losses. The incident light will reflect between the sloped surfaces, 

strengthening the interaction between the incident light and the semiconductor surface. The second 

layer is protected by a single or multi-layer antireflective coating [24-40]. These coatings are typically 

very thin, with an optical thickness of about one-quarter to one-half the incident wavelength. The anti-

reflector single-layer coating is only effective against reflection for a single wavelength, resulting in 

high-quality solar cells [38-50].  

 

Figure 1: Analysis of Coating on Solar Cell 

Precise PV modules optical assessment is not easy. The incident lights as shown in Figure 4.6 reflect 

the air glass interface (1), the glass packet (3), the packed cell (6) and the packet backplane (8); the 

reflection is normally diffuse in the latter two cases such that some reflected light is reflected internally 

entirely on the interface glass-air, which then returns to the cell. In the glass (2), box (4), the anti-

reflection cover of your battery or metal fingers (5) and a negative electrode, the incident lights are 

also absorbed (7). The 8 interactions depend on the wavelength of the incident and the angle of light 

incidence [42-74]. 

Because of its high anti-reflective impact against solar radiation, multilayer anti-reflecting coatings are 

frequently employed. Finally, a modern approach of collecting light is to use surface plasmas to 

improve the foil, solar cell structure, or light collection by using metal nanoparticles. Controlling the 

size of the particles allows them to be utilized as a dispersion layer effectively. One of the benefits of 

this light-trapping method is that the planar cell's silicon surface and passivation surface layer will 

remain the same, reducing surface reorganization losses. The subject of scientific research is to create 



Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 31 No. 1 (2024) 

 

 
268 

https://internationalpubls.com 

higher efficiency cell with lower cost for fabrication of solar cells [58-82]. Figure 1 shows the 

schematic diagram of solar cell. 

The efficiency of a solar cell is given by 

η =
FFVOC JSC

Pin
       (1) 

Where  

Pin = incident power 

FF = fill factor 

Jsc = short-circuit current density  

Voc = open circuit voltage.  

All three parameters (FF, Jsc and Voc) must be maximized to improve the efficiency of the solar cell. 

These parameters determine the efficiency of the photovoltaic panel and the production of electricity. 

The exploration of anti-reflective coatings in solar photovoltaic (PV) cells is a nuanced field that 

intersects materials science, optics, and semiconductor physics. The fundamental premise is that when 

photons with energy equal to or exceeding the band gap energy of a semiconductor material strike the 

material, they excite electrons, creating electron-hole (e-h) pairs, which are crucial for electricity 

generation in solar cells. 

The energy of incoming photons (𝐸𝑝ℎ) is given by the equation: 

𝐸𝑝ℎ −
ℎ𝑐

𝜆
              (2) 

where ℎ is Planck's constant, 𝑐 is the speed of light, and 𝜆 is the wavelength of the incident photon. In 

silicon, which is commonly used in PV cells, the band gap is 1.1eV, corresponding to a critical 

wavelength of 1.13𝜇m. Photons with energies above this band gap will have their excess energy 

dissipated as heat, while those with longer wavelengths will not contribute to electricity generation. 

The absorption coefficient (𝛼) of silicon, which indicates how efficiently the material absorbs light at 

different wavelengths, is described by: 

𝛼(𝜆) −
4𝜋𝑘4

𝜆
          (3) 

where 𝑘𝑒 is the extinction coefficient. As light penetrates the material, its intensity diminishes, 

described by: 

𝐼 − 𝐼0𝑒−𝛼𝑥 

with 𝐼0 being the initial light intensity and 𝑥 the depth of penetration. The generation rate of electron-

hole pairs (𝐺𝑒−ℎ) is then modeled by: 

𝐺𝑒−ℎ − 𝛼𝑁0𝑒−𝛼𝑧        (4) 

where N0 represents the photon flux at the material's surface. 



Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 31 No. 1 (2024) 

 

 
269 

https://internationalpubls.com 

Surface texturing on the solar cell enhances light trapping, increasing the chances of photon absorption 

by extending the path of light within the cell and promoting internal reflections at various angles. 

The spectral response (SR) of the solar cell, which links to the external quantum efficiency, is given 

by: 

𝑆𝑅(𝜆) −
𝑙sc

𝑃n(𝜆)
−

𝑞𝜆

ℎ𝑐
𝐸𝑄𝐸(𝜆)      (5) 

Here, 𝐼𝑆𝐶  represents the short-circuit current, 𝑃𝑖𝑛(𝜆) the incident light power, and 𝐸𝑄𝐸(𝜆) the external 

quantum efficiency. 

The reflection at the cell's surface is quantified by: 

𝑅(𝜆) −
(𝑛(𝜆)−1)2

(𝑛(𝜆)+1)2
      (6) 

where 𝑛(𝜆) is the wavelength-dependent refractive index of silicon. 

The external quantum efficiency, after accounting for reflection ( 𝑅 ) and transmission losses (𝑇), is 

expressed as: 

𝐸𝑄𝐸 − 𝐼𝑄𝐸(1 − 𝑅 − 𝑇)         (7) 

where IQE is the internal quantum efficiency. 

The maximum power output (𝑃𝑚𝑝 ) of a PV module is found using: 

𝑃𝑚𝑝 − 𝐹𝐹 ⋅ 𝐼𝑆𝐶 ⋅ 𝑉𝑂𝐶                        (8) 

with 𝐹𝐹 being the fill factor and 𝑉𝑂𝐶 the open-circuit voltage. 

The short-circuit current density (𝐽𝑆𝐶) is integral in optical modeling: 

𝐽𝑆𝐶 − ∫  
𝜆1

𝜆1
𝑆𝑅(𝜆)𝐹(𝜆)𝑇𝑔(𝜆)(1 − 𝑅𝑔(𝜆))𝑇𝐸𝑉𝐴(𝜆)𝑑𝜆           (9) 

where 𝐹(𝜆) is the spectral irradiance, 𝑇𝑔(𝜆) and 𝑅𝑔(𝜆) are the transmission and reflectivity of the 

cover glass, and 𝑇𝐸𝑉𝐴(𝜆) is the transmission of the encapsulant. 

The open-circuit voltage (𝑉𝑂𝐶) is linked to the temperature and ideality factor of the cell: 

𝑉𝑂𝐶 −
𝑘𝑇𝑖𝑚𝐿1

𝑞
ln (

𝐼sol 

𝐼𝐷,1
+ 1)              (10) 

where 𝑘 is Boltzmann's constant, 𝑇𝐶𝐸𝐿𝐿 is the cell temperature, and 𝐼𝐷,0 is the dark saturation current. 

Fresnel Reflection Coefficient (Single Interface): 

𝑅 − |
𝑛1−𝑛2

𝑛1+𝑛2
|

2

               (11) 

This equation calculates the reflectance at an interface between two media with refractive indices 𝑛1 

and 𝑛2. It shows how much light is reflected when it transitions between two different optical media.  

Transmittance (Single Interface): 

𝑇 − 1 − 𝑅                (12) 



Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 31 No. 1 (2024) 

 

 
270 

https://internationalpubls.com 

The transmittance at the interface is the fraction of light that is not reflected, essentially the 

complement of reflectance. 

 Snell's Law: 

𝑛1sin 𝜃1 − 𝑛2sin 𝜃2                (13) 

This law relates the angles of incidence and refraction (𝜃1 and 𝜃2) at an interface between two media 

with refractive indices 𝑛1 and 𝑛2. 

Phase Change on Reflection: 

𝛿 −
4𝜋𝑛𝑑cos 𝜃

𝜆
                  (14) 

This equation calculates the phase change 𝛿 for light reflecting inside a thin film of thickness 𝑑 and 

refractive index 𝑛, where 𝜆 is the wavelength in the medium. 

Total Reflection Coefficient (Multiple Interfaces): 

𝑅tatal − |
𝑛𝑛cos 𝜃𝑛−𝑛4cos 𝜃4

𝑛0cos 𝜃1+𝑛𝑠cos 𝜃𝑠
|

2

               (15) 

This is the reflectance for a system with multiple interfaces, considering the refractive indices 𝑛0, 𝑛𝜅 

and angles 𝜃0, 𝜃𝑠. 

Total Transmittance (Multiple Interfaces): 

𝑅multilayer = |
𝑟12+𝑟23𝑒𝑖𝛿1+𝑟34𝑒𝑖(𝛿1+𝛿2)+⋯

1+𝑟12𝑟23𝑒𝑖𝛿1+𝑟23𝑟34𝑒𝑖(𝛿1+𝛿2)+⋯
|

2

     (16) 

 

This equation gives the total transmittance for a multilayer system. Quarter-Wave Plate Condition: 

𝜆0 −
4𝑛𝑡𝑑

𝑚
               (17) 

For a quarter-wave plate, this condition determines the optimal thickness 𝑑 of a layer with refractive 

index 𝑛𝑓 to achieve destructive interference at a desired wavelength 𝜆0. 

Minimum Reflectance Condition: 

𝑅min − (
𝑛1−√𝑛0𝑛𝑠

𝑛1+√𝑛0𝑛𝑠
)

2

                (18) 

This equation calculates the minimum reflectance achievable for a given set of refractive indices. 

Effective Index: 

𝑛𝑓 − √𝑛0𝑛𝑠                  (19) 

The effective refractive index 𝑛𝑓 is used in the design of anti-reflective coatings, particularly in quarter-

wave stacks. 

Optimal Thickness for Anti-Reflective Coating: 

𝑑opt −
𝜆

4𝑛𝑗
                             (20) 



Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 31 No. 1 (2024) 

 

 
271 

https://internationalpubls.com 

This provides the optimal thickness of an anti-reflective coating layer to minimize reflectance at a 

specific wavelength 𝜆. 

Optical Path Difference: 

𝜙 −
2𝜋

𝜆
(𝑛2𝑑2 − 𝑛1𝑑1)              (21) 

This calculates the optical path difference between two paths with different refractive indices and 

thicknesses, crucial for understanding interference effects. 

Reflectance of a Double Layer System: 

This complex reflectance equation considers the individual reflections (𝑟12, 𝑟23) and phase change 

(𝛿) in a double-layer system. 

 

Transmission Coefficient (𝑡𝑖𝑗) : 

𝑡𝑖𝑗 −
2𝑛𝑖cos 𝜃𝑖

𝑛𝑖cos 𝜃𝑗+𝑛𝑗cos 𝜃𝑖
             (22) 

This equation calculates the transmission coefficient at the interface between two media with refractive 

indices 𝑛𝑖 and 𝑛𝑗 . The angles 𝜃𝑖 and 𝜃𝑗  are the angles of incidence and refraction, respectively. It 

determines how much light is transmitted from one medium to another. Reflectance for a Double Layer 

System ( 𝑅double  ): 

𝑅double = |
𝑟12+𝑟23𝑒12𝛿

1+𝑟12𝑟23𝑒𝑖2𝛿|
2

              (23) 

This complex equation calculates the reflectance in a double-layer system, considering individual layer 

reflectance (𝑟12, 𝑟2,1) and the phase change (𝛿), crucial for designing multi-layer antireflective 

coatings. These equations collectively provide a mathematical framework to analyze and design 

optimal anti-reflective coatings for solar cells, enhancing their efficiency by maximizing light 

absorption and minimizing reflection [22-42]. 

The framework outlined illustrates a complex interplay among the material attributes, photon 

dynamics, and electrical properties, shaping the efficiency of solar photovoltaic (PV) cells. This 

underscores the significance of anti-reflective coatings in enhancing the cell's performance [18-35]. 

Photon Reflection on Solar Cell Surfaces: Achieving high efficiency is paramount in solar cell design, 

yet various factors diminish this efficiency, with even top-tier cells converting only around 30% of 

incoming energy. Incident light may reflect off the cell's surface, particularly if the incident angle is 

steep or if the surface is highly reflective, potentially leading to a loss of up to 36% of the energy. 

Anti-reflective coatings are developed to mitigate this energy loss, enhancing the cell's ability to 

harness solar energy [44-68]. 

Low-Energy Photons: Photons vary in energy, and not all possess the requisite energy to bridge the 

material-specific band gap. Such photons may interact with electrons but fail to promote them from 

the valence to the conduction band, leading only to thermal heating rather than electricity generation. 

These interactions contribute to increased thermal losses, reducing the cell's efficiency [10-39, 102-

111]. 



Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 31 No. 1 (2024) 

 

 
272 

https://internationalpubls.com 

High-Energy Photons: Conversely, photons can also be overly energetic. When such a photon collides 

with an electron, it imparts enough energy for the electron to jump the band gap, but the surplus energy 

converts to heat, similar to the effect seen with low-energy photons. This thermal generation, coupled 

with heat from the inherent processes that enable electricity production in solar cells, influences the 

cell's temperature, which is crucial for optimal performance. Deviations from the ideal temperature 

can hinder charge carrier movement, diminishing power output [75-99]. 

Manufacturing Imperfections: The production of solar cells, using semiconductor materials, introduces 

inevitable defects and doping levels that impact the final product. These imperfections and doping-

induced anomalies in the crystalline structure can degrade efficiency. Moreover, the intrinsic resistance 

of the cell's metal contacts can lead to power losses and increased cell temperatures. Additionally, the 

interconnections and conductive grids on the cell's surface can block light, causing shadow effects that 

further reduce the cell's light intake and efficiency [24-81]. 

II. METHOLODOGY 

Round In order to reduce the surface impression of episode light and increase conversion efficiency, 

Pro anti-reflection film (ARC) is necessary. In silicone solar cells, the ARC is usually silicon nitride 

held by Plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD). The AR coverage of PECVD SiNx in 

the ordinary solar cell line has taken exceptional account, since it is controlled at low temperatures 

(about 400° C), has high performance and also gives viable passivation’s in surfaces. PECVD SiNx 

film increases conversion efficiency as AR covers the photographic generating power inside the silicon 

substratum and the passive process to lower n+ diffused surface recombination. Although SiNx by 

PECVD shows an outstanding combination of excellent electronic and optical properties, disservices 

have the tight wavelength for light retention and high UV assimilation, which lowers the cell's short-

circuit current [2, 81-103].  

 

Figure 2: Single-Layer Anti-Reflective Coating Schematic Diagram 

The dual layer anti reflecting coating (DLARC) is attached to the solar cell to take care of these issues. 

In addition to single layer ARC, the DLARC intakes light in the broader wavelength district and has a 

lower reflection rate. DLARC's PECVD method was discussed in various meetings due to the 

favorable circumstances described above. SiNx is the best container for forming DLARC, since the 

conventional thermal procedure (CTP) or the PECVD can be stored in SiO2. The proposed structure 

has been shown in Figure 4.8 [99-111]. 



Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 31 No. 1 (2024) 

 

 
273 

https://internationalpubls.com 

 The proposed structure has been simulated in technology computer aided design tool of silvaco and it 

is simulated under different coating thickness as well as for different solar spectrums. The simulation 

has been useful for comparative assessment of improvement in the spectral efficiency of solar cell and 

to understand the impact of material and thickness of the coating. This research uses the TCAD tool 

to establish the structure of the schematic diagram shown in the Figure 4.7 and 4.8 respectively. The 

first anti-reflective layer and Silicon oxide as the second layer have been mounted on the top of the 

silicon substrate Si3N4 as shown in Figure 4.9 [1-22, 83-110]. 

 

Figure 3: Anti-Reflecting Coating Schematic Diagram in Two Layers 

 

Figure 4:  Proposed Structure Schematic Diagram 

In the presence of an illuminated light stream at various incidence angles, the silicon solar cell was 

formed and simulated. The electric parameters of the proposed device and the simulation and 

modelling of silicone solar cell with ARC presence at various incident angles of 30°, 60° and even 90° 

can be calculated from the simulation [5-30]. 

Then, in order to compare with the SiO2/Si3N4 silicon solar cell, the second stage is to simulate and 

model the solar cell without the existence of ARC at various angles of the incident at 30°, 60° and 90°. 



Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 31 No. 1 (2024) 

 

 
274 

https://internationalpubls.com 

In the end, SiO2/Si3N4 silicon solar cell simulated responses are measured at different angles of incident 

i.e., 30, 60 degrees and 90 degrees. 

Step 1: The material of the semiconductor is used to build silicon solar crystalline cells. 

Step 2: Mesh is set to define the x and y system structure co-ordinates. 

Step 3: Identifying regions that include area number and regional materials. 

Step 4: Electrodes and electrode materials are identified along their location. 

Step 5: Description of material characteristics. 

Step 6 Characterization of each region by type of doping (n or p- type) and by the doping concentration. 

Step 7: Simulation process models are introduced. 

Step 8: SOLVE declaration conditions are specified for communication and interface given. 

Step 9: The LOG File is created and the I-V features of the system are saved. 

Step 10: Simulation of electric and optical characteristics. 

Step 11: Performance is drawn and extracted in the Tony Plot to be evaluated. 

In this work, the effectiveness of ARC compared to bare solar cells was expected to be higher. The 2D 

model bare silicone solar cell study is proved for direct radiation in the presence of an ARC in order 

to equate this with SiO2/Si3N4.  

III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS 

In this section we will cover the simulation results obtained against the design of multi-layer improved 

anti-reflecting coating of solar cell are discussed. The undertaken research has improved the overall 

spectral efficiency of solar cell in significant way.  

0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8

-0.05

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40

0.45

0.50

0.55

0.60

0.65

C
oe

ffi
ci

en
t o

f R
ef

le
ct

io
n

Wavelength of Beam

 Oxide and Nitride Coating

 Oxide coating @ 0.05 Micron

 NO ARC

 

Figure 5:  Analysis of Reflection Coefficient at 0.05 micron 

Figure 5 depicts a plot of usable two-layer photocurrent at 90 ° and its contrast relative to single layer 

coating at 0.05 micron. This is caused by the effect of light trapping by the decreased contribution of 

ARC. 



Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 31 No. 1 (2024) 

 

 
275 

https://internationalpubls.com 

In medium wavelength photon, the single layer coating is fine. The efficiency of coated silicon cells 

in all light spectrum is higher compared to bare silicon cells. This is done by increasing absorption and 

decreasing the silicone-based solar cell reflectance coefficient. 

The surface texture with anti-reflective cell cover not only decreases the effect, but also adds to the 

effect of light trapping, so that the progress of light is reflected in the tilted surfaces at slightly wider 

angles and thus the length of lights in the absorbent material increases. 

0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8

2.00E-009

4.00E-009

6.00E-009

8.00E-009

1.00E-008

1.20E-008

1.40E-008

1.60E-008

1.80E-008

2.00E-008

2.20E-008

2.40E-008

2.60E-008

C
ur

re
nt

 (A
)

Wavelength of Solar Spectrum

 NO ARC

 Oxide coating @ 0.05 Micron

 Oxide and Nitride Coating

 

Figure 6: Analysis of Available Current at 0.05 micron 

0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8

-0.05

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40

0.45

0.50

0.55

0.60

0.65

0.70

R
ef

le
ct

io
n 

C
oe

ffi
ci

en
t

Wavelength

 Reflectivity-With  Oxide and Nitride Dual Coating

 Reflectivity-With ARC @0.07 micron Oxide Coating

 Reflectivity-Without ARC

 

Figure 7: Analysis of Reflection Coefficient at 0.07 micron 



Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 31 No. 1 (2024) 

 

 
276 

https://internationalpubls.com 

0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8

2.00E-009

4.00E-009

6.00E-009

8.00E-009

1.00E-008

1.20E-008

1.40E-008

1.60E-008

1.80E-008

2.00E-008

2.20E-008

2.40E-008

2.60E-008

A
v
a

ila
b

le
 C

u
rr

e
n

t

Wavelength

 Without ARC

 With ARC @0.07 micron Oxide Coating

 With  Oxide and Nitride Dual Coating

 

Figure 8: Analysis of Available Current at 0.07 micron 

0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8

-0.05

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40

0.45

0.50

0.55

0.60

0.65

R
ef

le
ct

io
n 

C
oe

ffi
ci

en
t

Wavelength

 Oxide and Nitride Dual Coating

 ARC @ 0.09 Micron-Oxide

 NO ARC

 

Figure 9:  Analysis of Reflection Coefficient at 0.09 micron 



Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 31 No. 1 (2024) 

 

 
277 

https://internationalpubls.com 

0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8

0.00E+000

5.00E-009

1.00E-008

1.50E-008

2.00E-008

2.50E-008

A
va

ila
bl

e 
P

ho
to

 C
ur

re
nt

Wavelength

 ARC @ 0.09 Micron-Oxide

 Oxide coating @ 0.05 Micron

 With ARC @0.07 micron Oxide Coating

 

Figure 10: Analysis of Available Current in Single Layer Oxide Coatings at Different Thickness 

0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8

2.00E-009

4.00E-009

6.00E-009

8.00E-009

1.00E-008

1.20E-008

1.40E-008

1.60E-008

1.80E-008

2.00E-008

2.20E-008

2.40E-008

2.60E-008

A
va

ila
b

le
 C

u
rr

e
n

t

Optical wavelength

 Available Photo Current Without ARC

 Available Photo Current  Single Layer Coating

 Available Photo Current Multi Layer Coating

 

Figure 11:  Comparative Analysis of Available Current in Single Layer and Double Layer Coating at 

Optimum Coating Thickness 

The relative comparison of all three structures as far as variable optical wavelength is concerned is 

shown in Figure 4.19 and Figure 11. From the diagram it is evident that the available current in multi-

layer coverings is considerably higher at low wavelength.  



Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 31 No. 1 (2024) 

 

 
278 

https://internationalpubls.com 

 

Figure 12:  Comparative Analysis of Parameters in Single Layer and Double Layer Coating 

Indeed, due to increased light angles, the internal reflector strength is higher in silicon. This 

improvement in the length of the light path into the solar cell raises the likelihood of absorption 

significantly. Compared to single layer and uncoated silicon cell the reflection coefficient value of a 

multilayer coating is higher. Parameters such as the photocurrent, absorption coefficients, reflective 

coefficients and transmission coefficients were compared to the performance of the anti-reflective 

coating. The optimum coating is utilized to extract the characteristic of solar cell with respect to 

spectrum. The performance has been analyzed and implemented to understand the improvement of 

efficiency.  

CONCLUSION : The detailed research on the effect of single-layer and double-layer anti-reflective 

coatings (ARC) on the performance of solar cells shows how significant the ARC's are for the success 

of solar energy as a source of clean energy. The comparison of the double-doped ARC and its single-

doped counterpart indicates that the prior one is the best performer in voltage at maximum power point, 

current density, fill factor, and overall efficiency. More prominently, bi-layer ARC results in an 

appreciable increase in the current density and fill factor which leads to not only a higher ability to 

convert and utilize the absorbed sunlight but also, increased efficiency in this process. The use of these 

coatings allows for a marked boost in solar cells’ performance by means of approximately doubling 

their efficiency; this clearly shows the key part played by advanced surface technologies in the search 

for better and cheaper sources of sustainable energy. Additionally, this data agrees well with the 

underlying research tendencies that suggest the application of the multi-layer coating techniques 

instead of the usage of the basic ones which are bound to a particular wavelength of the spectrum. With 

the implementation of a double-layer approach, light's absorption over a wider spectral range is made 

possible further minimizing energy losses as a result of reflection, thereby leading to an optimal solar 

cell's energy conversion process. In the culmination of the research results presented in this paper, anti-

reflective coatings have played a significant role in the advancement of solar technology. The superior 

performance of double-layer ARCs could be seen as the crucial step toward obtaining the desired 

efficiency of solar cells, that is one of the major goals in the process of the renewable energy sources’ 



Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 31 No. 1 (2024) 

 

 
279 

https://internationalpubls.com 

worldwide transition. In the context of sustainable energy production, innovation in the ARC 

technology, which include transformations in harvesting and storing the solar energy, is the 

fundamental step necessary for the success of the energy transition leading to the sustainable future. 

REFRENCES 

[1] Cox, J.; Hass, G.; Thelen, A. Triple-Layer Antireflection Coatings on Glass for Visible and 

Near Infrared. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1962, 52, 965–969.  

[2] Green, M.A.; Dunlop, E.D.; Hohl-Ebinger, J.; Yoshita, M.; Kopidakis, N.; Hao, X. Solar Cell 

Efficiency Tables (Version 59). Prog Photovolt. Res. Appl. 2022, 30, 3–12.  

[3] Aiken, D. High Performance Anti-Reflection Coatings for Broadband Multi-Junction Solar 

Cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2000, 64, 393–404.  

[4] Kumar, K.R.T.; Ramakrishna, M.; Sukumar, G.D. A Review on PV Cells and Nanocomposite-

Coated PV Systems. Int. J. Energy Res. 2018, 42, 2305–2319.  

[5] Kumar, S.G.; Shetty, A.P.; Prashanth, C.R. Solar Cell Material Based on the Optimum Values 

of Key Parameters Using PC1D. In Proceedings of the 2021 2nd International Conference for 

Emerging Technology (INCET), Belagavi, India, 21 May 2021; pp. 1–6.  

[6] Meng, L.; Shi, L.; Ge, Y.; Tang, J.; Chen, Y.; Zhong, H. Photon Management of Combining 

Nanostructural Antireflection and Perovskite Down-Shifting Composite Films for Improving 

the Efficiency of Silicon Solar Cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2021, 220, 110856.  

[7] Shanmugam, N.; Pugazhendhi, R.; Elavarasan, R.; Kasiviswanathan, P.; Das, N. Anti-

Reflective Coating Materials: A Holistic Review from PV Perspective. Energies 2020, 13, 

2631.  

[8] Sarkin, A.; Ekren, N.; Saglam, S. A Review of Anti-Reflection and Self-Cleaning Coatings on 

Photovoltaic Panels. Sol. Energy 2020, 199, 63–73.  

[9] Zhao, J.; Wang, A.; Green, M. Double-Layer Antireflection Coating for High-Efficiency 

Passivated Emitter Silicon Solar-Cells. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 1994, 41, 1592–1594.  

[10] Tang, J.F.; Gu, P.F.; Liu, X. Modern Optical Thin Film Technology; Zhejiang University Press: 

Hangzhou, China, 2006; ISBN 978-7-308-04977-1.  

[11] Chattopadhyay, S.; Huang, Y.F.; Jen, Y.J.; Ganguly, A.; Chen, K.H.; Chen, L.C. Anti-

Reflecting and Photonic Nanostructures. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2010, 69, 1–35.  

[12] Moys, B. Theory of Double-Layer Antireflection Coatings. Thin Solid Film. 1974, 21, 145–

157.  

[13] Aberle, A.G. Overview on SiN Surface Passivation of Crystalline Silicon Solar Cells. Sol. 

Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2001, 65, 239–248.  

[14] Li, Z.Y. Study on Gradient Refractive Index Reduced Reflection Photovoltaic Glass. Ph.D. 

Thesis, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China, 2014.  

[15] Epstein, L.I. The Design of Optical Filters. J. Opt. Soc. Am. JOSA 1952, 42, 806–810.  

[16] Zhao, J.; Green, M.A. Optimized Antireflection Coatings for High-Efficiency Silicon Solar 

Cells. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 1991, 38, 1925–1934.  

[17] Aroutiounian, V.M.; Martirosyan, K.; Soukiassian, P. Low Reflectance of Diamond-like 

Carbon/Porous Silicon Double Layer Antireflection Coating for Silicon Solar Cells. J. Phys. D 

Appl. Phys. 2004, 37, L25–L28.  



Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 31 No. 1 (2024) 

 

 
280 

https://internationalpubls.com 

[18] Zhu, M.F.; Xiong, S.Z. Solar Cell Basics and Applications, 2nd ed.; Science Press: Beijing, 

China, 2014; ISBN 978-7-03-039789-8.  

[19] Vila, M.; Román, E.; Prieto, C. Electrical Conduction Mechanism in Silicon Nitride and Oxy-

Nitride-Sputtered Thin Films. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 97, 113710.  

[20] Li, M.; Zeng, L.; Chen, Y.; Zhuang, L.; Wang, X.; Shen, H. Realization of Colored 

Multicrystalline Silicon Solar Cells with SiO2/SiNx:H Double Layer Antireflection 

Coatings. Int. J. Photoenergy 2013, 2013, 352473 

[21] Bilyalov, R.R.; Lüdemann, R.; Wettling, W.; Stalmans, L.; Poortmans, J.; Nijs, J.; Schirone, 

L.; Sotgiu, G.; Strehlke, S.; Lévy-Clément, C. Multicrystalline Silicon Solar Cells with Porous 

Silicon Emitter. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2000, 60, 391–420.  

[22] Li, M.; Shen, H.; Zhuang, L.; Chen, D.; Liang, X. SiO2 Antireflection Coatings Fabricated by 

Electron-Beam Evaporation for Black Monocrystalline Silicon Solar Cells. Int. J. 

Photoenergy 2014, 2014, 670438. 

[23] Richards, B. Single-Material TiO2 Double-Layer Antireflection Coatings. Sol. Energy Mater. 

Sol. Cells 2003, 79, 369–390.  

[24] Strehlke, S.; Bastide, S.; Guillet, J.; Levy-Clement, C. Design of Porous Silicon Antireflection 

Coatings for Silicon Solar Cells. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2000, B69-70, 81–86. 

[25] Zhao, J.; WANG, A.; Altermatt, P.; Green, M. 24 Percent Efficient Silicon Solar-Cells with 

Double-Layer Antireflection Coating and Reduced Resistance Loss. Appl. Phys. 

Lett. 1995, 66, 3636–3638.  

[26] Parm, I.; Kim, K.; Lim, D.; Lee, J.; Heo, J.; Kim, J.; Kim, D.; Lee, S.; Yi, J. High-Density 

Inductively Coupled Plasma Chemical Vapor Deposition of Silicon Nitride for Solar Cell 

Application. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2002, 74, 97–105.  

[27] Pislaru-Danescu, L.; Chitanu, E.; El-Leathey, L.; Marinescu, V.; Marin, D.; Sbarcea, B. 

Synthesis and Characterization of Antireflective ZnO Nanoparticles Coatings Used for Energy 

Improving Efficiency of Silicone Solar Cells. Electron. Mater. Lett. 2018, 14, 376–386.  

[28] Tian, X. Study on the Thermodynamic Matching Problem between Substrate and Thin Film in 

Optical Thin Film Technology. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences 

(Institute of Optoelectronic Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Beijing, China, 2020.  

[29] Chung, R.J.; Lin, Z.C.; Lin, C.A.; Lai, K.Y. Study of an Antireflection Surface Constructed of 

Controlled ZnO Nanostructures. Thin Solid Film. 2014, 570, 504–509.  

[30] Su, H.; Huang, J.; Yu, Z. Effects of High-Low Temperature Test on Laser Films in Normal 

Atmosphere. Chin. J. Lasers 2011, 38, 157–162.  

[31] Zahid, M.; Khokhar, M.; Kim, Y.; Yi, J. Utilization of CaF2/ITO Double-Layer Anti-Reflective 

Coating for Increasing the Efficiency in Rear Emitter SHJ Solar Cells. Cryst. Res. 

Technol. 2022, 57, 2100233. 

[32] Hou, B.; Kim, B.; Lee, H.K.H.; Cho, Y.; Giraud, P.; Liu, M.; Zhang, J.; Davies, M.L.; Durrant, 

J.R.; Tsoi, W.C.; et al. Multiphoton Absorption Stimulated Metal Chalcogenide Quantum Dot 

Solar Cells under Ambient and Concentrated Irradiance. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 

2004563.  



Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 31 No. 1 (2024) 

 

 
281 

https://internationalpubls.com 

[33] Haider, J.; Rahman, M.; Corcoran, B.; Hashmi, M.S.J. Simulation of Thermal Stress in 

Magnetron Sputtered Thin Coating by Finite Element Analysis. J. Mater. Process. 

Technol. 2005, 168, 36–41.  

[34] Hou, G.; Garcia, I.; Rey-Stolle, I. High-Low Refractive Index Stacks for Broadband 

Antireflection Coatings for Multijunction Solar Cells. Sol. Energy 2021, 217, 29–39.  

[35] Swathi, R.; Shanthi, J.; Aishwarya, S.; Anoop, K. Photon Management by Scratch-Resistant 

Antireflection Coating for the Efficiency Enhancement of Silicon Solar Cell. Int. J. Energy 

Res. 2022, 46, 15485–15498.  

[36] Chinnasamy, M.; Rathanasamy, R.; Sivaraj, S.; Kaliyannan, G.; Anbupalani, M.; Jaganathan, 

S. Influence of ZnSe Surface Coatings for Enhancing the Performance of Multicrystalline 

Silicon Solar Cells. J. Electron. Mater. 2022, 51, 2833–2842.  

[37] Santhosh, S.; Rajasekar, R.; Gobinath, V.; Moganapriya, C.; Kumar, S.; Sri, A. Influence of 

Electrosprayed MoSe2 Antireflective Surface Coatings on Performance of Multicrystalline 

Silicon Solar Cell. Silicon 2021, 14, 6039–6051.  

[38] Shah, D.K.; Devendra, K.C.; Umar, A.; Algadi, H.; Akhtar, M.S.; Yang, O.-B. Influence of 

Efficient Thickness of Antireflection Coating Layer of HfO2 for Crystalline Silicon Solar 

Cell. Inorganics 2022, 10, 171.  

[39] Sagar, R.; Rao, A. Nanoscale TiO2 and Ta2O5 as Efficient Antireflection Coatings on 

Commercial Monocrystalline Silicon Solar Cell. J. Alloy. Compd. 2021, 862, 158464.  

[40] Rathanasamy, R.; Kaliyannan, G.V.; Sivaraj, S.; Saminathan, A.; Krishnan, B.; Palanichamy, 

D.; Uddin, M.E. Influence of Silicon Dioxide-Titanium Dioxide Antireflective Electrosprayed 

Coatings on Multicrystalline Silicon Cells. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2022, 2022, 9444524.  

[41] Malik, P.; Gupta, H.; Ghosh, S.; Srivastava, P. Study of Optical Properties of Single and Double 

Layered Amorphous Silicon Nitride Films for Photovoltaics Applications. Silicon 2022, 2022, 

1–9.  

[42] Nussupov, K.K.; Beisenkhanov, N.B.; Keiinbay, S.; Sultanov, A.T. Silicon Carbide 

Synthesized by RF Magnetron Sputtering in the Composition of a Double Layer Antireflection 

Coating SiC/MgF2. Opt. Mater. 2022, 128, 112370.  

[43] Pfeiffer, K.; Dewald, W.; Szeghalmi, A. Antireflection Coating with Consistent Near-Neutral 

Color on Complex-Shaped Substrates Prepared by ALD. Opt. Lett. 2019, 44, 3270.  

[44] Alam, K.; Khan, K.I.; Ullah, A.; Ullah, A.; Ali, S.; Ullah, S.; Ali, A.; Hussain, S. Fabrication 

of Superhydrophillic and Graded Index Antireflective Double Layer Coating for Solar 

Photovoltaics Module Using Aerosol Impact Deposition Assembly. Thin Solid 

Film. 2021, 721, 138518.  

[45] Xu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Ai, L.; Lou, X.; Lin, S.; Lu, Y.; Fan, B.; Jin, J.; Song, W. Fabrication of 

Mesoporous Double-Layer Antireflection Coatings with near-Neutral Color and Application 

in Crystalline Silicon Solar Modules. Sol. Energy 2020, 201, 149–156.  

[46] Sarker, M.S.; Khatun, M.F.; Al Ahmed, S.R.; Hossain, J. Optimization of Multilayer 

Antireflection Coatings for Improving Performance of Silicon Solar Cells. In Proceedings of 

the 2019 International Conference on Computer, Communication, Chemical, Materials and 

Electronic Engineering (IC4ME2), Rajshahi, Bangladesh, 11–12 July 2019; pp. 1–4.  



Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 31 No. 1 (2024) 

 

 
282 

https://internationalpubls.com 

[47] Zhang, S.; Yao, Y.; Hu, D.; Lian, W.; Qian, H.; Jie, J.; Wei, Q.; Ni, Z.; Zhang, X.; Xie, L. 

Application of Silicon Oxide on High Efficiency Monocrystalline Silicon PERC Solar 

Cells. Energies 2019, 12, 1168.  

[48] Xiao, X.; Zhu, H.; Liu, Z.; Tu, J. Multilayer Antireflection Coatings Design for SiO2-Passivated 

Silicon Solar Cells. Materialwiss. Werkstofftech. 2022, 53, 80–88.  

[49] Bouhafs, D.; Moussi, A.; Chikouche, A.; Ruiz, J.M. Design and Simulation of Antireflection 

Coating Systems for Optoelectronic Devices: Application to Silicon Solar Cells. Sol. Energy 

Mater. Sol. Cells 1998, 52, 79–93.  

[50] Xiong, C.; Xu, W.; Zhao, Y.; Xiao, J.; Zhu, X. New Design Graded Refractive Index 

Antireflection Coatings for Silicon Solar Cells. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 2017, 31, 1740028.  

[51] Ho, W.-J.; Hsu, H.-W.; Yang, H.-Y.; Liu, J.-J.; Tsai, Y.-T.; Chiu, W.-C. Plasmonic Scattering 

and Coupling Effects of Indium Nanoparticles Sheets Embedded in SiO2 AR-Coating on 

Performance Enhancement of Silicon Solar Cells. In Proceedings of the 2020 47th IEEE 

Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), Virtual, 15 June–21 August 2020; pp. 0231–

0233.  

[52] Alone-Alaluf, M.; Appelbaum, J.; Croitoru, N. Properties of GaAs Solar Cells Coated with 

Diamondlike Carbon Films. Thin Solid Films 1998, 320, 159–162.  

[53] Liao, K.; Chen, J.; Xia, L.; Zhong, S.; Luo, X. Study about the Effect of Antireflection Coating 

Stacks (TiO2-SiO2/SiO2/SiNx) on the Performances of Multicrystalline Silicon Solar Cells 

under the Encapsulation Condition. Opt. Mater. 2020, 109, 110318.  

[54] Dabaghyan, G.A.; Matevosyan, L.M.; Avjyan, K.E. Determination of Refractive Index and 

Thickness of Nanosized Amorphous Carbon Films Via Visible Range Reflectance Spectra. J. 

Contemp. Phys. 2019, 54, 185–187.  

[55] Ma, Q.; Zhang, W.; Ma, D.; Fan, Z.; Ma, X.; Jiang, Z. Optimal Design of Quadruple-Layer 

Antireflection Coating Structure for Conversion Efficiency Enhancement in Crystalline Silicon 

Solar Cells. Optik 2019, 177, 123–130.  

[56] Hovhannisyan, A. Single-Layer Antireflection Coatings for GaAs Solar Cells. J. Contemp. 

Phys. 2008, 43, 136–138.  

[57] Mercy, P.A.M.; Wilson, K.S.J.; Fathima, M.I. Analysis of Reflectance of Various DLARC 

Systems in Solar Cells. AIP Conf. Proc. 2020, 2265, 030307.  

[58] Makableh, Y.F.; Vasan, R.; Sarker, J.C.; Nusir, A.I.; Seal, S.; Manasreh, M.O. Enhancement 

of GaAs Solar Cell Performance by Using a ZnO Sol–Gel Anti-Reflection Coating. Sol. Energy 

Mater. Sol. Cells 2014, 123, 178–182.  

[59] Khadir, A.; Kouzou, A.; Abdelhafidi, M.K. Effect of Anti-Reflective Coating on CIGS Solar 

Cells Performance. In Proceedings of the 2020 17th International Multi-Conference on 

Systems, Signals & Devices (SSD), Monastir, Tunisia, 3 July 2020; pp. 621–625.  

[60] Saint-Andre, S.; Rodriguez, D.; Perillo, P.; Barrera, M. TiO2 Nanotubes Antireflection Coating 

Design for GaAs Solar Cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2021, 230, 111201.  

[61] El Islam Boukortt, N.; Patané, S. High-Efficiency Cu (In1-XGax) Se2 Solar Cell Investigation 

with Single Layer Antireflection Coating of MgF2. In Proceedings of the 2019 2nd 

International Conference on Smart Grid and Renewable Energy (SGRE), Doha, Qatar, 19–21 

November 2019; pp. 1–5.  



Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 31 No. 1 (2024) 

 

 
283 

https://internationalpubls.com 

[62] Ma, C.; Zhao, C.; Fan, X.; Liu, Z.; Liu, J. Preparation of Non-Stoichiometric Al2O3 Film with 

Broadband Antireflective by Magnetron Sputtering. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2021, 764, 138299.  

[63] Bhattacharya, R.N.; Contreras, M.A.; Teeter, G. 18.5% Copper Indium Gallium Diselenide 

(CIGS) Device Using Single-Layer, Chemical-Bath-Deposited ZnS(O,OH). Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 

Part 2 Lett. Express Lett. 2004, 43, L1475–L1476.  

[64] Cho, D.; Lee, W.; Kim, M.; Shin, B.; Chung, Y. Color Tuning in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 Thin-Film Solar 

Cells by Controlling Optical Interference in Transparent Front Layers. Prog. 

Photovolt. 2020, 28, 798–807.  

[65] Scholtz, L.; Sutta, P.; Calta, P.; Novak, P.; Solanska, M.; Mullerova, J. Investigation of Barium 

Titanate Thin Films as Simple Antireflection Coatings for Solar Cells. Appl. Surf. 

Sci. 2018, 461, 249–254.  

[66] Würfel, U.; Herterich, J.; List, M.; Faisst, J.; Bhuyian, M.F.M.; Schleiermacher, H.-F.; 

Knupfer, K.T.; Zimmermann, B. A 1 cm2 Organic Solar Cell with 15.2% Certified Efficiency: 

Detailed Characterization and Identification of Optimization Potential. Solar RRL 2021, 5, 

2000802.  

[67] Suleimanov, S.; Berger, P.; Dyskin, V.; Dzhanklich, M.; Kulagina, N.; Kim, M. Increasing the 

Efficiency of Organic Solar Cells by Antireflection Coatings Based on Fluoride 

Composites. Tech. Phys. Lett. 2018, 44, 295–296.  

[68] Huang, X.; Sun, B.; Li, Y.; Jiang, C.; Fan, D.; Fan, J.; Forrest, S.P. 15.9% Organic Tandem 

Solar Cell with Extended near-Infrared Absorption. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2020, 116, 153501.  

[69] Kim, J.-H.; Choi, Y.J.; Lee, J.; Lee, S.G. Highly Transparent Antireflection Coatings on 

Fullerene-Free Organic Solar Cells Using Polymeric Nanoparticles. Thin Solid 

Films 2022, 742, 139043.  

[70] Zhang, J.; Li, B.; Song, H.; Zhao, C.; Liang, S.; Dong, Z.; Yu, J. High Refractive Index 

Diphenyl Sulfide Photopolymers for Solar Cell Antireflection Coatings. Energies 2022, 15, 

3972.  

[71] Jang, W.; Park, K.H.; Wang, D.H. Increased Omnidirectional Light Absorbance by Using 

Hollow Silica Nanoparticles in an Anti-Reflective Pattern for Efficient Organic Photovoltaic 

Devices. Org. Electron. 2018, 53, 315–319.  

[72] Zhang, J.; Li, X.; Zhong, M.; Zhang, Z.; Jia, M.; Li, J.; Gao, X.; Chen, L.; Li, Q.; Zhang, W.; 

et al. Near 90% Transparent ITO-Based Flexible Electrode with Double-Sided Antireflection 

Layers for Highly Efficient Flexible Optoelectronic Devices. Small 2022, 18, 2201716.  

[73] Kim, D.I.; Lee, J.W.; Jeong, R.H.; Yang, J.W.; Park, S.; Boo, J.-H. Optical and Water-

Repellent Characteristics of an Anti-Reflection Protection Layer for Perovskite Solar Cells 

Fabricated in Ambient Air. Energy 2020, 210, 118582.  

[74] Huang, K.; Yu, X.; Cong, J.; Yang, D. Progress of Graphene-Silicon Heterojunction 

Photovoltaic Devices. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 5, 1801520.  

[75] Kim, M.; Kang, T.-W.; Kim, S.H.; Jung, E.H.; Park, H.H.; Seo, J.; Lee, S.-J. Antireflective, 

Self-Cleaning and Protective Film by Continuous Sputtering of a Plasma Polymer on Inorganic 

Multilayer for Perovskite Solar Cells Application. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2019, 191, 55–

61.  



Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 31 No. 1 (2024) 

 

 
284 

https://internationalpubls.com 

[76] Luo, Q.; Deng, X.; Zhang, C.; Yu, M.; Zhou, X.; Wang, Z.; Chen, X.; Huang, S. Enhancing 

Photovoltaic Performance of Perovskite Solar Cells with Silica Check for Nanosphere 

Antireflection Coatings. Sol. Energy 2018, 169, 128–135.  

[77] Xie, C.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z.-X.; Wang, D.; Luo, L.-B. Graphene/Semiconductor Hybrid 

Heterostructures for Optoelectronic Device Applications. Nano Today 2018, 19, 41–83.  

[78] Li, X.; Lv, Z.; Zhu, H. Carbon/Silicon Heterojunction Solar Cells: State of the Art and 

Prospects. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 6549–6574.  

[79] Shi, E.; Zhang, L.; Li, Z.; Li, P.; Shang, Y.; Jia, Y.; Wei, J.; Wang, K.; Zhu, H.; Wu, D.; et al. 

TiO2-Coated Carbon Nanotube-Silicon Solar Cells with Efficiency of 15%. Sci. Rep. 2012, 2, 

884.  

[80] Bhopal, M.; Lee, D.; Rehman, M.; Seo, Y.; Lee, S. Vanadium Pentoxide (V2O5) as an 

Antireflection Coating for Graphene/Silicon Solar Cell. Mater. Sci. Semicond. 

Process. 2018, 86, 146–150. 

[81] Li, D.; Kunz, T.; Wolf, N.; Liebig, J.; Wittmann, S.; Ahmad, T.; Hessmann, M.; Auer, R.; 

Goken, M.; Brabec, C. Silicon Nitride and Intrinsic Amorphous Silicon Double Antireflection 

Coatings for Thin-Film Solar Cells on Foreign Substrates. Thin Solid Films 2015, 583, 25–33.  

[82] Shi, E.; Li, H.; Yang, L.; Zhang, L.; Li, Z.; Li, P.; Shang, Y.; Wu, S.; Li, X.; Wei, J.; et al. 

Colloidal Antireflection Coating Improves Graphene-Silicon Solar Cells. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 

1776–1781.  

[83] Sahouane, N.; Zerga, A. Optimization of Antireflection Multilayer for Industrial Crystalline 

Silicon Solar Cells. Energy Procedia 2014, 44, 118–125.  

[84] Xiao, S.; Fan, Q.; Xia, X.; Xiao, Z.; Chen, H.; Xi, W.; Chen, P.; Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Liu, H.; et 

al. Dependence of the Solar Cell Performance on Nanocarbon/Si Heterojunctions. Chin. Phys. 

B 2018, 27, 078801.  

[85] Yoshikawa, K.; Kawasaki, H.; Yoshida, W.; Irie, T.; Konishi, K.; Nakano, K.; Uto, T.; Adachi, 

D.; Kanematsu, M.; Uzu, H.; et al. Silicon Heterojunction Solar Cell with Interdigitated Back 

Contacts for a Photoconversion Efficiency over 26%. Nat. Energy 2017, 2, 17032.  

[86] Musalinov, S.; Anzulevich, A.; Bychkov, I.; Gudovskikh, A.; Shvarts, M. Influence of Double- 

and Triple-Layer Antireflection Coatings on the Formation of Photocurrents in Multijunction 

III-V Solar Cells. Semiconductors 2017, 51, 88–92.  

[87] Herasimenka, S.; Dauksher, W.; Boccard, M.; Bowden, S. ITO/SiOx:H Stacks for Silicon 

Heterojunction Solar Cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2016, 158, 98–101.  

[88] Park, S.; Kim, Y.; Yi, J.; Zahid, M.; Khokhar, M.; Hussain, S. Influence of Al2O3/IZO Double-

Layer Antireflective Coating on the Front Side of Rear Emitter Silicon Heterojunction Solar 

Cell. Vacuum 2022, 200, 110967.  

[89] Kim, T.S.; Kim, H.J.; Geum, D.-M.; Han, J.-H.; Kim, I.S.; Hong, N.; Ryu, G.H.; Kang, J.; 

Choi, W.J.; Yu, K.J. Ultra-Lightweight, Flexible InGaP/GaAs Tandem Solar Cells with a Dual-

Function Encapsulation Layer. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 13248–13253.  

[90] Xiao, P.; Zhang, M.; Wu, X.; Ding, K.; Pan, J.; Jie, J. Enhancing the Efficiency and Stability 

of Organic/Silicon Solar Cells Using Graphene Electrode and Double-Layer Anti-Reflection 

Coating. Sol. Energy 2022, 234, 111–118.  



Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 31 No. 1 (2024) 

 

 
285 

https://internationalpubls.com 

[91] Kim, T.S.; Kim, H.J.; Han, J.-H.; Choi, W.J.; Yu, K.J. Flexible InGaP/GaAs Tandem Solar 

Cells Encapsulated with Ultrathin Thermally Grown Silicon Dioxide as a Permanent Water 

Barrier and an Antireflection Coating. ACS Appl. Energ. Mater. 2022, 5, 227–233.  

[92] Shockley, W.; Queisser, H.J. Detailed Balance Limit of Efficiency of P-n Junction Solar 

Cells. J. Appl. Phys. 1961, 32, 510–519.  

[93] El Amin, A.; Hassan, M. Fabrication Solar Cell of CdTe0.65P0.35/Si with High Efficiency Using 

Double-Layer Antireflection. Electr. Eng. 2018, 100, 1003–1007. 

[94] Campesato, R.; Greco, E.; Mezzetti, A.; di Fonzo, F.; Bissoli, F.; di Mezza, A. Effective 

Coating for High Efficiency Triple Junction Solar Cells. In Proceedings of the 2019 European 

Space Power Conference (ESPC), Côte d’Azur France, 30 September 2019; pp. 1–5.  

[95] Zhang, W.; Hu, K.; Tu, J.; Aierken, A.; Xu, D.; Song, G.; Sun, X.; Li, L.; Chen, K.; Zhang, D.; 

et al. Broadband Graded Refractive Index TiO2/Al2O3/MgF2 Multilayer Antireflection Coating 

for High Efficiency Multi-Junction Solar Cell. Sol. Energy 2021, 217, 271–279.  

[96] Singh, G.; Sekhon, J.S.; Verma, S.S. Enhanced Photocurrent in Thin-Film GaAs Solar Cells 

with Embedded Al Nanoparticles. Energy Sources Part A 2020, 42, 815–823.  

[97] Hongliang, G.; Linfeng, S.; Qiang, S.; Qiming, Z.; Yiyong, W.; Jingdong, X.; Bin, G.; Yanqing, 

Z. Degradation of Up-Grown Metamorphic InGaP/InGaAs/Ge Solar Cells by Low-Energy 

Proton Irradiation. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2019, 191, 399–405.  

[98] Chaudhry, F.; Escandell, L.; Lopez-Fraguas, E.; Vergaz, R.; Sanchez-Pena, J.; Garcia-Camara, 

B. Light Absorption Enhancement in Thin Film GaAs Solar Cells Using Dielectric 

Nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 9240.  

[99] Cossio, G.; Yu, E.; Tatavarti, S.; Scandrett, B.; Yu, E. Omnidirectional Current Enhancement 

From Laminated Moth-Eye Textured Polymer Packaging for Large-Area, Flexible III-V Solar 

Modules. IEEE J. Photovolt. 2021, 11, 685–691.  

[100] Schulze, P.; Bett, A.; Bivour, M.; Caprioglio, P.; Gerspacher, F.; Kabakl, O.; Richter, A.; 

Stolterfoht, M.; Zhang, Q.; Neher, D.; et al. 25.1% High-Efficiency Monolithic Perovskite 

Silicon Tandem Solar Cell with a High Bandgap Perovskite Absorber. Sol. RRL 2020, 4, 

2000152.  

[101] Raj, Ashish, and Manoj Gupta. "Design and simulation of improved particle swarm 

optimization-based maximum power point tracking system for solar photovoltaic systems 

under variable illumination and partial shading conditions." In AIP Conference Proceedings, 

vol. 2782, no. 1. AIP Publishing, 2023. 

[102]  Ashwini, Kumari, Ashish Raj, and Manoj Gupta. "Performance assessment and orientation 

optimization of 100 kWp grid connected solar PV system in Indian scenario." In 2016 

International conference on recent advances and innovations in engineering (ICRAIE), pp. 1-

7. IEEE, 2016. 

[103]  Raj, Ashish, Manoj Gupta, and Divya Suman. "Simulation of multilayer energy efficient 

OLEDs for flexible electronics applications." Procedia Computer Science 152 (2019): 301-

308. 

[104] Neethu Elizabeth Michael, Ramesh C. Bansal, Ali Ahmed Adam Ismail, A. Elnady, Shazia 

Hasan, A cohesive structure of Bi-directional long-short-term memory (BiLSTM) -GRU for 



Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis 

ISSN: 1074-133X 

Vol 31 No. 1 (2024) 

 

 
286 

https://internationalpubls.com 

predicting hourly solar radiation, Renewable Energy, Vol. 222, 2024, 119943, ISSN 0960-

1481. 

[105]  Ahmed G. Abo-Khalil, Maaza Abdalla, Ramesh C. Bansal, Nsilulu T. Mbungu, A critical 

assessment of islanding detection methods of solar photovoltaic systems, Case Studies in 

Thermal Engineering, Vol. 52, 2023, 103681, ISSN 2214-157X,  

[106]  Gali, Vijayakumar, B. Chitti Babu, Ramesh Babu Mutluri, Manoj Gupta, and Sunil Kumar 

Gupta. "Experimental investigation of Harris Hawk optimization‐based maximum power point 

tracking algorithm for photovoltaic system under partial shading conditions." Optimal Control 

Applications and Methods 44, no. 2 (2023): pp. 577-600. 

[107]  Gali, Vijayakumar, Madisa VG Varaprasad, Sunil Kumar Gupta, and Manoj Gupta. 

"Performance investigation of multifunctional grid connected PV interleaved inverter with 

power quality enhancement." Energy Systems (2021):              pp.  1-23. 

[108] Iqbal, Mohammad Asif, and Sunil Kumar Gupta. "TCAD based simulation and performance 

optimization of PPV/PCBM and Perovskite PV cells." International Journal of Computing and 

Digital Systems 10 (2020): 2-7. 

[109] Mohammad Asif Iqbal, Sunil Kumar Gupta, Comparative analysis between numerical 

simulation of PPV/PCBM and InGaN based solar cells, Materials Today: Proceedings, Vol. 

30, Part 1, 2020, pp. 168-173, 

[110] Keaobaka D. Poti, Raj M. Naidoo, Nsilulu T. Mbungu, Ramesh C. Bansal, Intelligent solar 

photovoltaic power forecasting, Energy Reports, Vol. 9, Supplement 11, 2023, pp. 343-352, 

ISSN 2352-4847, 

[111] Sameen Maqsood, Zohaib Ali, Khuram Ali, Mubashra Ishaq, Muhammad Sajid, Ahmad 

Farhan, Abbas Rahdar, Sadanand Pandey, Assessment of different optimized anti-reflection 

coatings for ZnO/Si heterojunction solar cells,Ceramics International, Vol. 49, Issue 23, Part 

A, 2023, pp. 37118-37126, ISSN 0272-8842.