Microsoft Word - AJCEB Vol.2 No.1 compiled sized.doc AHMED USMAN AWIL AND ABDUL RASHID ABDUL AZIZ 94 THE AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ECONOMICS AND BUILDING VOL.2 NO.1 INTERNATIONAL MARKETS: MALAYSIAN CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS AND THE STAGE THEORY Ahmed Usman Awil and Abdul Rashid Abdul Aziz School of Housing Building and Planning, Universiti Sains Malaysia INTRODUCTION The construction industry plays a major and vital role in transforming the aspirations and the needs of people into reality by physically implementing various development projects The construction industry in Malaysia con- sists of over 40,000 companies, employs 800,000 people and is served by around 140 supporting industries (CIDB, 2000). The in- dustry has experienced a rise and fall over the last twenty years. While the growth in construction was 17.3% in 1995 it contracted by 23% during the Asian financial crisis of 1997–98 (MBAM, 2001), resulting in loss of employment, bankruptcies and idle re- sources. The priming of the economy under- taken by the Malaysian government since 1998, though increasing investment in con- struction, has not been able to bring back the period of high growth. Most contractor firms tend to concentrate on the home market and only when the home market contracts is there any pres- sure to diversify into other markets. Unfor- tunately by this time the firm is lacking in resources and it takes a few months to a few years to develop a sound business plan for working overseas. This project-centric nature of business has driven both re- sources and attention towards projects at hand to the detriment of systematic, focused business development activities (Katsanis and Katsanis, 2001). By operating offshore, companies are able to offset seasonal and/or cyclical fluctuations in their domestic market demand and are able to diversify their market portfolio, products or services as well as improving their competitive posi- tion (El-Higzi, 2001). The need is to provide an alternative approach, from knee-jerk re- actions to proactive strategies, by contract- ing firms in Malaysia. The objective of this research is twofold; firstly, locating the factors that motivate Ma- laysian construction contractors to under- take work overseas, and secondly, tracing the position of Malaysian construction firms to Cavusgil’s (1980) export stages so as to match assistance to the progress they have achieved. Internationalisation of Malaysian contractors has been chosen as a subject because of the need to provide opportunities for Malaysian contractors to stabilise their operations. This study is a follow up to a previous study by Rashid (1994a). DEFINITION OF INTERNATIONALISATION As this paper is concerned with internation- alisation of construction contractors it is necessary to define internationalisation. It is the process of leveraging domestic compe- tencies into foreign markets and transfer- ring competitive advantages based on such factors as superior technology and prod- ucts. In a very simple sense, then interna- tionalisation stems from the domestic operation (Hendry 1996). All activities the firm undertakes, from the initial moment that the firm considers seeking work over- seas to the moment that the firm exports its services abroad, are included in this proc- ess. Internationalisation in this paper refers to the process of construction firms leaving their home markets in search of opportuni- ties abroad. LITERATURE REVIEW Increasingly the place to do business is in the global marketplace. Recent trends have ushered in an era of unprecedented export opportunities. Increasing competition at home from both local and global companies, falling barriers to international trade and improved international communication and information networks have pressed many companies to compete in the international markets (Wolff and Pett, 2000). Since the 1960s many developing countries have begun the transition from import sub- stitution to more outward-looking develop- ment strategies. This has involved export support programs aimed at diversification of the composition of exports away from tradi- tional products towards increased involvement in non-traditional exports (Haar and Orbiz- INTERNATIONAL MARKETS: MALAYSIAN CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS AND THE STAGE THEORY THE AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ECONOMICS AND BUILDING VOL.2 NO.1 95 Buonafina, 1995). In the case of Malaysia this consisted of shifting attention to manu- facturing exports in 1970s and 1980s and recently to the export of services. Factors that push firms into exporting can be divided into two categories: one internal to the organisation and the second coming from the environment in which the firm is operating (Ghauri, 2000). The first category factors include the ambitions and goals of the individuals and the organisation as re- gards to resources, capabilities and strate- gies. The second category relates to environments at home and in the foreign market such as tax regulations, legal re- quirements, financial considerations, and the type of industry, investigation costs and potential profit possibilities. Dunning (1993: 249) developed a paradigm for exporting services, which explained the globalisation of firms and markets. Accord- ing to Dunning the reasons why firms wish to engage in foreign-based activities are: to acquire inputs for further processing activities to supply foreign markets with goods and services more beneficial than by alternative means; sequential investment to acquire assets or some kind of com- petitive advantage rather than to exploit the use of an existing competitive advantage. In the construction services sector contrac- tors undertaking work overseas have been studied by Quak (1989), Crosthwaite (1998), Neo (1975) and Kaynak and Dalgic (1992). A comparison of the various studies and the factors that pushed firms towards interna- tionalisation are shown in Table 1 What is clear from these studies is that, al- though the reasons may be different for dif- ferent countries and for different periods over time, there were three basic reasons: to expand businesses, to diversify risks and to gainfully employ available resources. Internationalisation is a complex, multidi- mensional construct, which comprises ele- ments of different strategies. (Kutscher and Baurle, 1997). Among the determinants that push a firm towards internationalisation is size. Larger size is a source of differential advantage enhancing performance in export marketing. Many studies have confirmed that size is a factor in exporting, including those by Calof (1933 and 1994), Samiee and Walters (1990), Katsikeas and Leonidou (1996), Dalli (1995) and Moini (1995). Table 1: Factors that push a firm towards internationalisation Study Neo (1975) Quak (1989) Kaynak and Dalgic (1992) Crosthwaite (1998) Period of study Early 1970s Late 1980s 1990 1990–1996 Country of study UK Singapore Turkey UK No. of firms 22 24 Not reported 10 Main factors in Interna- tionalisation Expansion of firm Top management vision Protect share- holder interests Efficient utilisation of available resources Business expansion Spreading of risks Generating economies of scale Competitive advantage resulting from specialist expertise or technology Market contraction at home Utilisation of resources Entrepneurship Booming market in the Middle East Long term profitability Maintain share holder return Diversify risk Sources: in the table AHMED USMAN AWIL AND ABDUL RASHID ABDUL AZIZ 96 THE AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ECONOMICS AND BUILDING VOL.2 NO.1 The size of the firm is important in that it determines the ability of the firm to tap into a large resource pool to assemble the ser- vices required by clients (Sillars and Kangari 1997). Cavusgil (1984) identified firm size as a concomitant variable (associated with ex- port activity) rather than a causative factor. In the construction industry size, apart from superior technology, is a prime factor as only firms of specific capability and appro- priate resources will be able to compete in the international arena. In the internationalisation process manag- ers play an important role, apart from that played by market forces, as it is managers who decide whether to internationalise or not, the path to be followed and the means to be used. A domestic market where many firms operate internationally will speed up learning about internationalisation pros- pects and strategies for all firms operating in that market (Hendry 1996). If the market in which the firm operates is competitive then there is an increased pressure on the firm to internationalise (Naidu and Rao, 1993). Companies in export-intensive indus- tries (measured by the percentage of do- mestic competitors engaged in exporting) are more likely to have progressed in the internationalisation process. In studying the business environment seven factors that motivate and act as determi- nants of internationalisation have been con- sidered. Table 2 is a compilation of the factors and the studies from which they were derived. Table 2: Factors that motivate firms to internationalise Factor Studies from which they were derived Growth in the long term Burpitt and Rondinelli (1998) Burpitt and Rondinelli (2000) Stabilisation of markets Kaynak and Dalgic (1992) Naidu and Prasad (1994) Bennett, Flanagan and Norman (1987) Top management vision Reuber and Fischer (1997) Cavusgil (1984) Dichtl et al. (1984) Holzmuller and Kasper (1990) Specialist expertise and technology Ghauri (2000) Strassmann (1988) Namiki (1988) Beamish, Craig and McLellan (1993) Burton and Schlegelmilch (1987) Size Calof (1993) Calof (1994) Seymour (1987) Samiee and Walters (1990) Katsikeas et al. (1996) Dalli (1995) Globalisation (competition) Bartlett and Ghoshal (2000) Naidu and Prasad (1994) Raftery et al. (1998) Ofori and Betts (1992) UNCTD (1999) Government support Quak (1991) Gray (1997) UNCTD (2000) Naidu and Rao (1993) INTERNATIONAL MARKETS: MALAYSIAN CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS AND THE STAGE THEORY THE AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ECONOMICS AND BUILDING VOL.2 NO.1 97 Stage theory Once they have decided on exporting firms have many paths open to them as to how to approach the intended market. The known approaches of internationalisation are the stage model, the contingency model, the interaction model and the social construc- tion model (Sorenson, 1997). Among these the most developed stream is the stage the- ory of internationalisation. The stage theory of internationalisation is accomplished in a sequential process. Most of the literature on internationalisation supports the stage the- ory of internationalisation (Kasikeas and Leonidou, 1996). The majority of firms ap- proach international business involvement in an experimental manner committing re- sources for newer management tasks in- crementally (Cavusgil, 1984). Among the pioneers of the stage theory, Jo- hanson and Vahlne (1977) reasoned that the complexity of internationalisation makes it a series of incremental decisions rather than one big leap of faith. The firm’s expansion radiates from the home market in a system- atic fashion; the operations of the firm are extended first to those markets that best fit the cognitive and resource character of the company, and ultimately those of the poor- est fit. Culture plays an important role in this and firms are inclined to initially ‘test the waters’ of countries sharing the same cul- ture, language or regulating laws (Fisher and Ranasinghe, 2001). As the international experience of the firm develops, so will the size and the complexity of these operations (Millington and Bayliss, 1990). Cavusgil (1984) attributes the sequential character of the internationalisation process to the greater perceived risks associated with in- ternational business. Each stage of internationalisation involves an increased commitment to international activities, with movement between stages driven by changes in management attitude towards export risks, costs and benefits (Calof, 1994). One can infer that incremental success builds confidence, leading to more extensive export activity, and hence to greater internationalisation. Gankema et al. (2000) in their model gave a time frame of two years for the transition from one stage of the export process to the next. Reuber and Fischer (1997) believe that firms with internationally experienced management team can internationalise much faster than other firms. According to Cavusgil’s (1980) model, export involvement is operationalised by export/ sales ratio, which is thought to reflect the extent of a firm’s dependence on foreign markets. In this study we will be considering the stage model of Cavusgil (1980) (Table 3) as our model for the evaluation of the pro- gress of Malaysian contractors. Table 3: Stages in exporting Stage Description Stage 1: Domestic marketing The firm is only interested in the domestic market and does not export at all. The export/sales ratio is 0 Stage 2: Pre-export The firm searches for information and evaluates the feasibility of exporting activities. The export/sales ratio is at or near 0 Stage 3: Experimental involvement The firm starts exporting on a small basis. Physical and cultural distances are limited. The involvement of an experimental exporter is usually marginal and intermittent. The export/sales ratio varies from 0–9% Stage 4: Active involvement There is systematic effort to increase sales through export to multiple countries. A suitable organisational structure is in place to support these activities. The export/sales ratio is 10–39% Stage 5: Committed involvement The firm depends heavily on foreign markets. Managers are continuously faced with choices for allocation of limited resource to either domestic or foreign markets. The export/sales ratio is 40% or more Source: Cavusgil (1980) AHMED USMAN AWIL AND ABDUL RASHID ABDUL AZIZ 98 THE AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ECONOMICS AND BUILDING VOL.2 NO.1 As shown in Figure 1 there have been four stages which the firms in the construction industry have gone through in their quest for markets overseas. Before going any further it is important to understand what constitutes international construction and who the international con- tractors are. The international market in which the contractors operate is different from the home market in that the level of risk is higher, the project sizes are larger and the level of demand corresponds to the project specifics (Seymour, 1987). Interna- tional trade in construction services involves participation in a relatively limited number of large projects, the nature of which (e.g. en- ergy, transportation, infrastructure, urban construction) fluctuates overtime (UNCTD 2000). Strassman and Wells (1988) nominate three distinct types of structures that are built by construction firms across the world — small and simple, large but conventional, and technologically complex and novel. Re- tail stores, highways and petrochemical plants illustrate these three types. Interna- tional entry for construction services begins with those types of activities with which the firm is familiar and in which it has the most complete set of resources. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY In selecting the contractors for this survey only Malaysian contractors were considered. Contractors were selected from two sources. The Construction Business Devel- opment Division of the CIDB provided its publication entitled "Going global — A stra- tegic partnership of global builders” — this booklet contains a list of Malaysian contrac- tors and consultants interested in undertak- ing work overseas. Consultants and those contractors whose primary business inter- ests were not in construction were excluded from the sample. The second source considered was the con- tractor organisations listed in the main and second board of the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange (KLSE). This was done because only contractors of a certain size have the necessary number of employees, access to finance, and good equipment and technical expertise available in-house (Seymour, 1987; Quak, 1991, along with the studies concern- ing the size factor cited in Table 3). Figure 1: The various stages that Turkish contractors passed in their progress towards international contractors Low cost bidders to win projects abroad Sought more efficient business opportunities to maintain profitability Concentration on economies of scale to improve productivity and efficient Become global companies which are diversified along concentric, horizontal and conglomerate lines Source Kaynak and Dalgic (1992) INTERNATIONAL MARKETS: MALAYSIAN CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS AND THE STAGE THEORY THE AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ECONOMICS AND BUILDING VOL.2 NO.1 99 The questionnaire was divided into two parts: one on the motives and experiences of the contractors, and the second on ways to encourage potential contractors to export. The data collection was done using a self- administered mail questionnaire in the first phase as this afforded geographical flexibil- ity and large sample size (Tan, 1995). The second phase dealt with interviewing repre- sentatives of construction contractors. A three page questionnaire was prepared and sent to the 68 selected contractors early in June 2001. An added benefit of sharing the research findings of this study was commu- nicated to the contractors. Following the suggestion of Roth and BeVier (1998) a pre- paid envelope was sent with the question- naire in order to increase the number of responses. Fifteen completed questionnaires were re- turned. Only six respondents had export ex- perience while nine were non-exporters. Though the response rate was only 22% it was encouraging considering that histori- cally contractors are reluctant to share in- formation for various reasons including the possibility of compromising business se- crets, or lack or time or resources. Katsanis and Katsanis (2001) had difficulty in obtain- ing access to industry players due to intense competition between players and fear of re- vealing key indicators. Ofori and Chan (2001) and Dulaimi and Tan (2001) in their study of Singaporean contractors also had low re- sponse rates. Generally a response rate of 20%–40% is considered normal in mail sur- veys (Tan, 1995). RESEARCH FINDINGS A majority of Malaysian contractors under- took overseas work related to civil engineer- ing projects. Civil engineering is one of the types of work that suits foreign contractors are suitable, as the scope of the work is generally large (Seymour, 1987; Strassman and Wells, 1988) and may need some sort of financing by the foreign contractor (Table 4). A contributing reason is the expertise of Ma- laysian contractors in civil engineering works due to their experiences with the same type of work undertaken previously in Malaysia. South East Asia ranked first among the re- gions where contractors undertook work (Table 5). This is not unexpected as contrac- tors are mostly comfortable doing work in neighbouring countries. In Quak's (1991) study of Singaporean contractors 80% of contractors gave South East Asia and North Asia as their primary areas of work. This is supported by the stage theory of incremental internationalisation of firms. The second most active region in terms of number of contractors undertaking work was South Asia, followed by Africa and Europe. Table 4: Type work undertaken overseas Number of positive responses Type of work undertaken overseas Mainly Occasionally Rank Civil engineering 1 3 1 Building 2 0 2 Specialist (M&E, steel erection) 1 0 3 Petrochemical and processing plants 1 0 3 AHMED USMAN AWIL AND ABDUL RASHID ABDUL AZIZ 100 THE AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ECONOMICS AND BUILDING VOL.2 NO.1 The most common mechanism for securing work overseas is that of joint ventures and alliances. Alliance formation is one way to provide construction services by combining the strengths of firms that provide comple- mentary services (Sillars and Kangari, 1997). This high percentage indicates that the con- tractors prefer to have local expertise when undertaking work overseas. To initiate, or- ganise and execute work abroad, a con- struction firm will often associate itself with other firms from both the home country and foreign countries in order to win contracts in the international arena. The profile of Malaysian contractors who export their services is reflected in their status in the execution of the contracts. Half the contractors nominated ‘responsibility as main contractor’ as their main work over- seas (Table 7). This suggests that Malaysian contractors are of reasonable size and are capable of bidding for work independently. Table 5: Parts of the world where contractors undertake work Parts of the world that Malaysian contractors undertake work Rank Number of positive responses East and South East Asia 1 5 South Asia 2 2 Africa and Europe 2 2 Middle East 3 1 Australia and Oceania - - North and South America - - Table 6: Mechanism of securing contracts overseas Number of positive responses Rank Mechanism of securing overseas work Mainly Occasionally Joint ventures/ alliances 2 2 1 International tenders 1 2 2 World Bank/ADB 2 0 3 INTERNATIONAL MARKETS: MALAYSIAN CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS AND THE STAGE THEORY THE AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ECONOMICS AND BUILDING VOL.2 NO.1 101 Factors for internationalisation The next part of the study was aimed at identifying the factors that motivated the exporting contractors towards internation- alisation. Table 2 lists seven factors for in- ternationalisation that were developed from previous studies. The collated results of the motivation factors for internationalisation are given in Table 8. The highest mean of the seven factors was for the long-term profitability of the contrac- tors; this has also been given as the highest mean by the previous studies by Rashid (1994b), Crosthwaite (1998) and Seymour (1987). The long-term profitability of the firm is connected with the survival of the firm. This can be attributed to the strategic plans that the firm has mapped over a period of time and in which internationalisation of the firm is just one of the areas that the firm is exploring. The second most important factor is a tie between three factors: stabilisation of mar- kets, natural progress due to size, and glob- alisation (competition). Construction differs from other industries by virtue of its diver- gent private and public demand patterns. Private sector construction tends to be highly cyclical in nature (UNCTC, 1990) while public sector construction tends to be much more stable. Firms based in countries with limited domestic markets understandably are more drawn into international markets than are firms that have large home mar- kets or firms in booming economies (UNCTC 1990). Table 7: Contractor's role overseas Work execution capacity Rank Number of contractors Main contractor 1 3 Specialist sub-contractor 2 2 Turn-key contractor 2 2 Project management 3 1 Sub-contractor - - Table 8: Motivating factors for internationalisation Number of responses MeanInternationalisation factors Rank Very important Important Moderately important Not important Long-term profitability 1 3 3 - - 3.5 Stabilisation of markets 2 2 3 1 - 3.17 Natural progress due to size 2 2 3 1 - 3.17 Globalisation 2 2 3 1 - 3.17 Top management vision 3 1 4 1 - 3 Specialist expertise technology 3 1 4 1 - 3 Government incentives* 4 2 - 3 - 2.8 * Only five contractors replied to this question Very important = 4, Important = 3, Moderately important = 2, Not important =1 AHMED USMAN AWIL AND ABDUL RASHID ABDUL AZIZ 102 THE AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ECONOMICS AND BUILDING VOL.2 NO.1 Natural progress due to size is concerned with the firm’s strategy in utilising its re- sources efficiently. When firms grow over a period of time they come to a cross-road were the firm has to decide on the possible paths to sustain their growth. Among the options available is that of to internationalis- ing the firm — this has the added benefit of using the resources (human, capital, equip- ment and expertise) available to the firm efficiently. Globalisation (with a mean of 3.17) in its pre- sent form will be a determinant in shaping the strategies of the contractors. Contrac- tors will find it increasingly difficult to re- main in their home markets and hope to benefit from home country growth. The creation of the WTO and GATS (General Agreement on Trade and Services) has made it imperative that contractors be aware of the opportunities and threats that they will face over a period of time. An important point noted by Ghoshal and Bartlett (2000) is that "in today's global markets, you don’t have to go abroad to experience interna- tional competition. Sooner or later the world comes to you". In the long-term the differ- ences between home and overseas markets will be blurred and it will be advantageous to take the initiative now, for tomorrow might be too late. The joint third position holders were top management vision and special expertise. The views of the top management in shaping firms’ programs has been noted as a factor in the motivation towards internationalisa- tion in previous studies by Dichtl et al. (1984), Holzmuller and Kasper (1990), Reu- ber and Fischer (1997) and Cavusgil (1984). Management that is interested in gaining a foothold for the firm in the international market is interested in expanding its areas of operation. Provision of specialist expertise and tech- nology motivates the firm in competing for the niche area of expertise within the con- struction services for which it has the re- sources (personnel and equipment). This experience of Malaysian contractors in working with foreign contractors exposed them to new technologies and work methods during the period of high economic growth of 1990–1997. Governmental incentive to export was given as having the least impact as motivation for exporting by contractors, however, govern- ment incentives to export can make or break the export of services. Both South Korea and Japan have been known to aggressively promote their construction industry. Provision of technological services at com- petitive prices was the main factor in con- tractors winning contracts in the international market (Table 9). By pursuing differentiation through technological superi- ority of products and services, firms can compete in the international market (Namiki, 1988). This is due to the fact that Malaysian contractors are capable of provid- ing services comparable to those of devel- oped world contractors but at prices that are a fraction of what developed world contrac- tors charge. The next most important fac- tors that contractors attribute to their winning contractors overseas are size of the firm and reputation of the firm. Size of firm, and a consequent ability to tap into a large resource pool, has been identified previously by Sillars and Kangari (1997) as a factor in the firms doing work overseas. Assistance in exporting (results of exporters and non-exporters) In this section data from non-exporters has been included, making the number of re- spondents in this case 15. The contractor organisations’ need of assistance from the government/governmental organisations was queried. Respondents cited provision of market intelligence as the most important assistance that the government can provide to both exporters and potential exporters (Figure 2). Market intelligence provision can help the contractor organisations find opportunities that are available internationally. Provision of market intelligence has also been cited by Quak (1991) as an assistance that the government can provide to encourage exporting. This information will help guide the firm towards making informed decisions about the opportunities available overseas. INTERNATIONAL MARKETS: MALAYSIAN CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS AND THE STAGE THEORY THE AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ECONOMICS AND BUILDING VOL.2 NO.1 103 73.3 60 53.3 46.7 20 6.7 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 M arket intelligence Export credit finance Preferential tax support Setting up of consortium s Defray m arketing costs Other help N a tu re o f a s s is ta n c e r e q u ir e d % of contractors Table 9: Factors that enable contractors winning contracts overseas Important factors enabling contractors winning contract's overseas Rank Number of positive responses Technology at competitive rates 1 4 Size of firm 2 3 Reputation of firm 2 3 Project management expertise 3 2 Specialist expertise 3 2 Strong equipment support 3 2 International experience 4 1 Others 4 1 Figure 2: Assistance needed to enable contractors to export DISCUSSION Increasing the number of contractors that can export services will involve disseminat- ing information that is focused towards the contractor organisations and then following it up by organising visits to potential markets that have been identified based on the stage theory of firms. Initially this will involve iden- tifying neighbouring countries with which the home market shares culture and language as that will reduce the natural inhibitions associated with exporting. As shown in Table 8, emphasising the long-term possibilities of overseas market can help attract the firms towards internationalisation. Different firms will have different needs, so it is necessary to know the stage a firm has reached in in- ternationalisation; as Moini (1998) noted, matching assistance to the stage of export- ing that firms have reached has a positive AHMED USMAN AWIL AND ABDUL RASHID ABDUL AZIZ 104 THE AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ECONOMICS AND BUILDING VOL.2 NO.1 impact on making firms respond to such assistance. While large contractors will need market intelligence, smaller contrac- tors need to be introduced to the opportuni- ties overseas through seminars and forums dedicated to this subject. Pooling of resources can help in reducing the initial risks involved while introducing markets to the contractors. This may be in the form of alliances among the contractors themselves or of consortia set up by the CIDB. Also the contractors, as they climb up the ladder of internationalisation, can then tender independently once they have learnt the ropes of the international construction market. CONCLUSION Entering new markets is one of the strate- gies that can help contractors diversify their operations abroad and so overcome reduced demand at home. Contractors are motivated by the need to maintain long-term profitabil- ity of the firm. Other factors that were held to be important are the need to stabilise markets, accommodating the increasing size of the enterprise, and globalisation (i.e. increased integration of markets). Most firms had a proactive approach to seeking markets for their services. A majority of firms passed through stages in exporting of their services by initially exporting to neighbouring countries and then, as the firm goes up the "the learning curve", to other countries. Potential exporters were concerned mainly with creating necessary conditions for them to seek opportunities abroad. Among the conditions that will help them in this regard are having knowledge of projects as they are announced overseas, the market complexi- ties, and access to funds in the form of ex- port credit finance that can offset the initial amount spent in overcoming the "learning curve". Local Malaysian contractors can gain an advantage by having a larger number of them bid for projects by forming alliances among themselves. Increased participation by local firms also demands that foreign firms take a local partner so as to achieve some synergy in their operations. Acknowledgement One of the authors wishes to thank the scholarship provided by the Islamic Devel- opment Bank, Saudi Arabia REFERENCES Bartlett, C. and Ghoshal, S. (2000) Going Global: Lesson from late movers. Harvard Business Review, March–April, 132–142. Beamish, P., Craig, R. and McClellan, K. (1993) The performance characteristics of Canadian versus UK exporters in small and medium sized firms. Management Interna- tional Review, 33 (2), 121–137. Bennett, J., Flanagan, R. and Norman, G. (1987) Japanese Construction Industry. Capital and Counties Report. Centre for Strategic Studies in Construction, University of Reading. Burpitt, W. and Rondinelli, D. (1998) Export decision making in small firms: The role of organisational learning. Columbia Journal of World Business, 33 (1), 51–68. Burpitt, W. and Rondinelli, D. (2000) Small firms motivation for exporting: To earn and learn. Journal of Small Business Manage- ment, 38 (4), October. Calof, J. (1993) The impact of size on inter- nationalisation. Journal of Small Business Management, October, 60–69. Calof, J. (1994) The relationship between firm size and export behaviour revisited. Journal of International Business Studies, Second Quarter, 367–387. Cavusgil, T. (1980) On the internationalisa- tion process of firms. European Research, 8 (6) 273–281. Cavusgil, T. (1984) Organisational character- istics associated with export activity. Journal of Management Studies, 21 (1) 3–21. CIDB (Construction Industry Development Board) (2000). Going Global: A strategic partnership of global builders: positioning Malaysia-India on global frontiers. CIDB, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Crosthwaite, D. (1998) The internationalisa- tion of British construction companies 1990– 1996: An empirical analysis. Construction Management and Economics, 16, 389–395. Czinkota, M. and Massaki, K. (1992) State government promotion of manufacturing exports: A gap. Journal of International Business Studies, 23 (4), 637–658. Dalli, D. (1995) The organisation of exporting activities: Relationships between internal and external arrangements. Journal of Business Research, 34, 107–115. INTERNATIONAL MARKETS: MALAYSIAN CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS AND THE STAGE THEORY THE AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ECONOMICS AND BUILDING VOL.2 NO.1 105 Dichtl, E., Leibold, M., Koglmayr H-G. and Muller S. (1984) The export decision of small and medium sized firms: A review. Man- agement International Review, 24, 49–60. Dulaimi, M. and Tan Fu Hwa (2001) Develop- ing world-class construction companies in Singapore. Construction Management and Economics, 19, 591–599. Dunning, J. (1993) The globalisation of busi- ness: the challenges of the 1990s. Routledge, London. El-Higzi, F. (2001) International Market entry for construction services. International Journal of Construction Marketing. 3. www.brookes.ac.uk/other/conmark/IJCM/ Fisher, T. and Ranasinghe M. (2001) Culture and foreign companies choice of entry mode: the case of Singapore building and construction industry. Construction Man- agement and Economics, 19, 343–353. Gankema, H., Henoch, G.J., Snuif R. and Zwart, P. (2000) The internationalisation process of small and medium sized enter- prises: An evolution of stage theory. Journal of Small Business Management, 38 (4), 15–27. Ghauri, P. (2000) Internationalisation of the firm. In: Tayeb M. (ed.) International Busi- ness: Theories, Policies and Practices. Prentice Hall, Essex. Ghoshal, S. and Bartlett, C. (2000) Going Global: Lessons from late movers. Harvard Business Review, March–April, 132–142. Gray, B. (1997) Profiling managers to im- prove export promotion targeting. Journal of International Business Studies, Second Quarter, 387–420. Haar, J. and Ortiz-Buonafina, M. (1995) The internationalisation process and marketing activities: The case of Brazilian export firms. Journal of Business Research, 32, 175–181. Hendry, C. (1996) Continuities in human re- source processes in internationalisation and domestic business management. Journal of Management Studies, 33, July, 475–494. Holzmuller, H. and Kasper H. (1990) The de- cision maker and export activity: a cross- national comparison of the foreign orienta- tion of Austrian managers. Management International Review, 30 (3) 217–230. Johanson, J. and Vahlne J. E. (1977) The In- ternationalisation of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing for- eign commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8 (1), 23–32. Katsanis C. and Katsanis, L. P. (2001). An Examination of Business Development Ac- tivities and Implications for Marketing in the AEC Industry. Journal of International Con- struction Marketing, 3. www.brookes.ac.uk/ other/conmark/IJCM/ Katsikeas, C. and Leonidou, L. (1996) The export development process: An integrative review of empirical models. Journal of Inter- national Business Studies, Third Quarter, 517–551. Kaynak, E. and Dalgic, T. (1992) Internation- alisation of Turkish Construction Compa- nies: A lesson for third world countries. Columbia Journal of World Business, Win- ter, 60–75. Kutschker, M. and Bauerle, I. (1997) Three+One: Multidimensional strategy of internationalisation. Management Interna- tional Review, 37 (2) 103–125. MBAM (Master Builder Association of Ma- laysia) (2001) Data concerning the rise and fall of Malaysian construction industry over the last 20 years collected from their web- site: www.mbam.org Millington, A. and Bayliss, B. (1990) The process of internationalisation: UK Compa- nies in the EC. Management International Review 30, (2), 151–161. Moini, A. (1995) An inquiry into successful exporting: An empirical investigation using three-stage model. Journal of Small Busi- ness Management, July, 33 (3). Moini. A. (1998) Small business exporting: How effective are government export assis- tance export programs? Journal of Small Business Management, 36 (1), 1–15. Naidu, G. and Rao T. (1993) Public sector promotion of exports: A need based ap- proach. Journal of Business Research, 27, 85–101. Naidu, G. and Kanti Prasad, V. (1994) Predic- tors of export strategy and performance of Small and Medium sized firms. Journal of Business Research 31, 107–115. Namiki, N. (1988) Export strategy for small business. Journal of Small Business Man- agement, 26 (2). Neo, R. (1975) International construction contracting: A critical investigation into cer- AHMED USMAN AWIL AND ABDUL RASHID ABDUL AZIZ 106 THE AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ECONOMICS AND BUILDING VOL.2 NO.1 tain aspects of financing, capital planning and cash flow affects. Gower Press, Farnborough. Ofori, G. and Betts M. (1992) Strategic plan- ning for competitive advantages in construc- tion. Construction Management and Economics, 10, 511–532. Ofori, G. and Chan Swee Lean (2001). Fac- tors influencing development of construction enterprise in Singapore. Construction Man- agement and Economics, 19, 145–154. Quak, S. K. (1989) Cover Story: Seeking niches in the international construction market. Construction Markets Digest, CIDB Singapore, 2–11. Quak, S. K. (1991) Marketing Abroad: Com- petitive Strategies and Market Niches for the Singaporean construction industry. Pacific Trade Press, Singapore. Raftery, J., Pasadilla, B., Chiang, Y.H., Hui, C.M. and Tang Bo-Sin (1998) Globalisation and construction industry development: Im- plications of recent developments in the construction sector in Asia. Construction Management and Economics, 16, 729–737. Rashid, A. (1994a) International expansion of Malaysian contractors. National Seminar on Contracting in Malaysia, June 1994, Univer- siti Sains Malaysia Rashid, A. (1994b) Global Strategies: A com- parison between Japanese and American Construction firms. Construction Manage- ment and Economics, 12, 473–484. Reuber, R. and Fischer, E. (1997) The influ- ence of the management team’s interna- tional experience on the internationalisation behaviours of SME's. Journal of Interna- tional Business Studies, Fourth Quarter, 807–825. Roth, P. and BeVier, C. (1998) Response rates in HRM/OP Survey Research: Norms and Correlates, 1990–1994. Journal of Man- agement, 24 (1) 97–117. Samiee, S. and Walters, P. (1990) Influence of firm size on export planning and perform- ance. Journal of Business Research, 20, 235–248. Seymour, H. (1987) The multinational con- struction industry. Croom-Helm, London. Sillars, D. and Kangari, R. (1997) Japanese Construction Alliances. Journal of Construc- tion Engineering and Management, 123 (2), 146–152. Sorenson, O. (1997) Internationalisation of companies: different perspectives on how companies internationalise. International Business Economics, Working paper Series No. 23. Aalborg University, Centre of International studies, Copenhagen. Strassman W. and Wells J. (1988) Introduc- tion. In: Strassman and Wells (eds.) The Global Construction Industry. Unwin Hyman, London. Tan, W. (1995) Research methods in real estate and construction. SBEM Textbook Series, School of Building and Real Estate, National University of Singapore. UNCTC (United Nations Centre on Transna- tional Corporations) (1990). Transnational corporations, services and the Uruguay round. Sales No. E.90.II.A.11. ST/CTC/103. UNCTD (United Nations Centre on Trade and Development) (1999). Analysis of experi- ences in selected services sector. Trade and Development Board, TD/B/COM.1/28, 17 Au- gust 1999. UNCTD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development) (2000) Regularisa- tion and liberalisation in the construction services sector and its contribution to the development of the developing countries. Trade and Development Board, TD/B/COM.1/EM.12/2, 12 September 2000. Wolff, J. and Pett, T. (2000) Internationalisa- tion of the small firms: An examination of export competitive patterns, firm size, and export performance. Journal of Small Busi- ness Management, October, 2000.