calculs&_nbsp_08.dvi CUBO A Mathematical Journal Vol.12, No¯ 03, (121–138). October 2010 Calculations in New Sequence Spaces and Application to Statistical Convergence BRUNO DE MALAFOSSE LMAH Université du Havre, BP 4006 IUT Le Havre, 76610 Le Havre. France email: bdemalaf@wanadoo.fr AND VLADIMIR RAKOČEVIĆ1 Department of Mathematics, University of Niš, Videgradska 33, 18000 Niš, Serbia email: vrakoc@bankerinter.net ABSTRACT In this paper we recall recent results that are direct consequences of the fact that (w∞ (λ) , w∞ (λ)) is a Banach algebra. Then we define the set Wτ = Dτw∞ and charac- terize the sets Wτ (A) where A is either of the operators ∆, Σ, ∆(λ), or C (λ). Afterwards we consider the sets [A1, A2]Wτ of all sequences X such that A1 (λ) (∣∣A2 ( µ ) X ∣∣) ∈ Wτ where A1 and A2 are of the form C (ξ), C + (ξ), ∆(ξ), or ∆+ (ξ) and it is given necessary conditions to get [ A1 (λ) , A2 ( µ )] Wτ in the form Wξ. Finally we apply the previous results to statis- tical convergence. So we have conditions to have xk → L (S ( A)) where A is either of the infinite matrices D1/τC (λ) C ( µ ) , D1/τ∆(λ)∆ ( µ ) , D1/τ∆(λ) C ( µ ) . We also give conditions to have xk → 0 (S ( A)) where A is either of the operators D1/τC + (λ)∆ ( µ ) , D1/τC + (λ) C ( µ ) , D1/τC + (λ) C+ ( µ ) , or D1/τ∆(λ) C + ( µ ) . 1Supported by Grant No. 144003 of the Ministry of Science, Technology and Development, Republic of Serbia. 122 Bruno de Malafosse & Vladimir Rakočević CUBO 12, 3 (2010) RESUMEN Recordamos resultados recientes que son consecuencia directa del hecho de que (w∞(λ), w∞(λ)) es una algebra de Banach. Entonces nosotros definimos el conjunto Wτ = Dτw∞ y caracterizamos los conjuntos Wτ (A) donde A es uno de los siguientes operadores ∆, Σ, ∆(λ), o C (λ). Después consideramos los conjuntos [A1, A2 ]Wτ de todas las sucesiones X tal que A1 (λ) (∣∣A2 ( µ ) X ∣∣) ∈ Wτ donde A1 y A2 son de la forma C (ξ), C+ (ξ), ∆(ξ), o ∆+ (ξ) y son dadas condiciones necesarias para obtener [ A1 (λ) , A2 ( µ )] Wτ en la forma Wξ. Final- mente, aplicamos los resultados previos para tener xk → L (S ( A)) donde A es una de las matrices infinitas D1/τC (λ) C ( µ ) , D1/τ∆(λ)∆ ( µ ) , D1/τ∆(λ) C ( µ ) . Nosotros también damos condiciones para tener xk → 0 (S ( A)) donde A es uno de los operadores D1/τC + (λ)∆ ( µ ) , D1/τC + (λ) C ( µ ) , D1/τC + (λ) C+ ( µ ) , o D1/τ∆(λ) C + ( µ ) . Key words and phrases: Banach algebra, statistical convergence, A−statistical convergence, infinite matrix. Math. Subj. Class.: 40C05, 40F05, 40J05, 46A15. 1 Introduction In this paper we consider spaces generalizing the well-known sets w0 and w∞ introduced and studied by Maddox [12, 13]. Recall that w0 and w∞ are the sets of strongly summable and strongly bounded sequences. In [15] Malkowsky and Rakočević gave characterizations of matrix maps between w0, w, or w∞ and w p ∞ and between w 0, w, or w∞ and l1. In [2] de Malafosse defined the spaces wα (λ), w (c) α (λ) and w 0 α (λ) of all sequences that are α−strongly bounded, summable and summable to zero respectively. For instance recall that wα (λ) is the set of all sequences (xn)n such that 1/λn ∑n m=1 |xm| = αnO (1) as n tends to infinity. It was shown that these spaces can be written in the form sξ, s (c) ξ and s0 ξ under some condition on α and λ. More recently in [5] it was shown that if λ is a sequence exponentially bounded then (w∞ (λ) , w∞ (λ)) is a Banach algebra. This result led to consider bijective operators mapping between w∞ (λ). Here we will use these results to study sets of the form Wτ = Dτw∞, Wτ (∆(λ)), Wτ (C (λ)) and Wτ ( C+ (λ) ) generalizing the well-known set of strongly bounded sequences c∞ = w∞ ( ∆ ( µ )) where µn = n for all n. These results lead to the study of statistical convergence which was introduced by Steinhaus in 1949, see [16], and studied by several authors such as Fast [7], Fridy, Orhan [8-11] and Connor. Here we will deal with the notion of A− statistical convergence which generalizes the notion of statistical convergence, see [6], where A belongs to a special class of operators. CUBO 12, 3 (2010) Calculations in New Sequence Spaces ... 123 The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 among other things we recall a recent result on the operators ∆ρ and ∆ T ρ considered as map from w∞ (λ) to itself. In Sections 3 and 4 our aim is to give necessary conditions to have Wτ (A) in the form Wξ when A is either one of the matrices ∆(λ), C (λ) or C+ (λ). Then we consider spaces generalizing the well- known set of all strongly bounded sequences [C,∆] = c∞ defined and studied by Maddox. Then we will define the sets [A1, A2]Wτ of all sequences X with A1 (λ) (∣∣A2 ( µ ) X ∣∣) ∈ Wτ where A1 and A2 are of the form C (ξ), C + (ξ), ∆(ξ), or ∆+ (ξ) and we will give necessary conditions to get [ A1 (λ) , A2 ( µ )] in the form Wτ. In Section 5 we apply these results to A− statistical convergence, where A is equal to D1/τ A1 A2 and A1, A2 are of the form C (ξ), ∆(ξ), ∆ ( µ ) , or C+ (ξ). 2 Well Known Results For a given infinite matrix A = (anm)n,m≥1 we define the operators An for any integer n ≥ 1, by An (X ) = ∞∑ m=1 anm xm (1) where X = (xn)n≥1, the series intervening in the second member being convergent. So we are led to the study of the infinite linear system An (X ) = bn n = 1, 2, ... (2) where B = (bn)n≥1 is a one-column matrix and X the unknown, see [2-5]. The equations (2) can be written in the form A X = B, where A X = (An (X ))n≥1. In this paper we shall also consider A as an operator from a sequence space into another sequence space. We will write s for the set of all complex sequences and ℓ∞ for the set of all bounded sequences. Let E and F be any subsets of s. When A maps E into F we write that A ∈ (E, F). So for every X ∈ E, A X ∈ F, (A X ∈ F means that for each n ≥ 1 the series defined by yn =∑ ∞ m=1 anm xm is convergent and ( yn)n≥1 ∈ F). Body Math For any subset E of s, we put Body Math AE = {Y ∈ s : Y = A X for some X ∈ E} . (3) If F is a subset of s, we shall denote F (A) = FA = {X ∈ s : Y = A X ∈ F} . (4) 124 Bruno de Malafosse & Vladimir Rakočević CUBO 12, 3 (2010) In all what follows we will use the set U + = { (un )n≥1 ∈ s : un > 0 for all n } and the notation e = (1, ..., 1, ...). So for λ = (λn)n≥1 ∈ U + we will consider the sets of strongly bounded and strongly summable sequences, respectively, that is w∞ (λ) = { X = (xn)n≥1 ∈ s : sup n 1 λn n∑ m=1 |xm| < ∞ } , w 0 (λ) = { X = (xn)n≥1 ∈ s : lim n→∞ 1 λn n∑ m=1 |xm| = 0 } and w (λ) = { X = (xn)n≥1 ∈ s : X − l e ∈ w 0 (λ) for some l ∈ C } were studied by Malkowsky, with the concept of exponentially bounded sequences, see [3]. Recall that Maddox [12, 13], defined and studied the sets w∞ (λ) = w∞, w0 (λ) = w 0 and w (λ) = w where λn = n for all n. A Banach space E of complex sequences with the norm ‖‖E is a BK space if each projection Pn : X 7→ Pn X = xn is continuous. A BK space E is said to have AK if every sequence X = (xn)n≥1 ∈ E has a unique representation X = ∑ ∞ n=1 xn e n where e n is the sequence with 1 in the n-th position and 0 otherwise. Recall that a nondecreasing sequence λ = (λn)n≥1 ∈ U + is exponentially bounded if there is an integer m ≥ 2 such that for all non-negative integers ν there is at least one term λn ∈ I (ν) m = [ mν, mν+1 − 1 ] . It was shown (cf. [14, Lemma 1]) that a non-decreasing sequence λ = (λn)n≥1 is exponentially bounded if and only if there are reals s ≤ t such that for some subsequence ( λni ) i≥1 0 < s ≤ λni λni+1 ≤ t < 1 for all i = 1, 2, ...; such a sequence is called an associated subsequence. Consider now the norm ‖X‖λ = sup n ( 1 λn n∑ m=1 |xm| ) . In [5] it was shown that if λ = (λn)n≥1 ∈ U + is exponentially bounded the class (w∞ (λ) , w∞ (λ)) is a Banach algebra with the norm ‖A‖(w∞(λ),w∞(λ)) = sup X 6=0 ( ‖A X‖λ ‖X‖λ ) . (5) CUBO 12, 3 (2010) Calculations in New Sequence Spaces ... 125 For ρ = ( ρn ) n≥1 consider now the following matrices ∆ + ρ =   1 −ρ1 . . 1 −ρn 0 . .   and ∆ρ =   1 −ρ1 1 0 . . −ρn−1 1 . . .   . It can easily be shown that if ρ = ( ρn ) n≥1 and (λn+1/λn)n≥1 ∈ ℓ∞ then ∆ + ρ ∈ (w∞ (λ) , w∞ (λ)). We also see that ∆ρ ∈ (w∞ (λ) , w∞ (λ)) for ρ, (λn−1/λn)n≥2 ∈ ℓ∞. Recall the next result which is a direct consequence of [5, Theorem 5.1 and Theorem 5.12]. Lemma 2.1. Let λ ∈ U+ be a sequence exponentially bounded. (i) If lim n→∞ ( λn+1 λn ) < ∞ and lim n→∞ ∣∣ρn ∣∣ < 1 lim n→∞ ( λn+1 λn ) , (6) for given B ∈ w∞ (λ) the equation ∆ + ρ X = B has a unique solution in w∞ (λ). (ii) If lim n→∞ ∣∣ρn ∣∣ < 1 lim n→∞ ( λn−1 λn ) , (7) then for any given B ∈ w∞ (λ) the equation ∆ρ X = B has a unique solution in w∞ (λ). When λ is a strictly increasing sequence tending to infinity we obtain similar results on the Banach algebra ( w0 (λ) , w0 (λ) ) with the norm ‖A‖(w∞(λ),w∞(λ)). 3 On the Sets Wτ (A) Where A is Either ∆(λ), C (λ) or C + (λ) In the following we will use the operators represented by C (λ) and ∆(λ). Let U be the set of all sequences (un )n≥1 with un 6= 0 for all n. We define C (λ) for λ = (λn)n≥1 ∈ U, by [C (λ)]nm =    1 λn if m ≤ n, 0 otherwise. We will write C (λ)T = C+ (λ), C (e) = Σ, Σ+ = ΣT , and for λn = n, the matrix C1 = C ((n)n) is called the Cesaro operator. If It can be proved that the matrix ∆(λ) with [∆(λ)]nm =    λn if m = n, −λn−1 if m = n − 1 and n ≥ 2, 0 otherwise, 126 Bruno de Malafosse & Vladimir Rakočević CUBO 12, 3 (2010) is the inverse of C (λ), see [2, 3]. We will use the following sets Γ = { X ∈ U + : lim n→∞ ( xn−1 xn ) < 1 } , Γ + = { X ∈ U + : lim n→∞ ( xn+1 xn ) < 1 } . Note that X ∈ Γ+ if and only if 1/X ∈ Γ. For given sequence τ = (τn)n≥1 ∈ U +, we write Dτ for the diagonal matrix defined by [Dτ]nn = τn for all n. For any subset E of s, we write DτE = { X = (xn)n≥1 ∈ s : ( xn τn ) n ∈ E } . We put Wτ = Dτw∞ for τ ∈ U +, that is Wτ = { X : ‖X‖Wτ = sup n ( 1 n ∞∑ m=1 |xm| τm ) < ∞ } . It can easily be seen that Wτ = w∞ (D1/τ) is a BK space with norm ‖‖Wτ , (cf. [17, Theorem 4.3.6, p. 52]). In all that follows we will use the convention that the entries with subscripts strictly less than 1 are equal to zero. Then we are interested in the study of the following sets where λ, τ ∈ U+. Wτ (∆(λ)) = { X : sup n ( 1 n n∑ m=1 1 τm |λm xm −λm−1 xm−1| ) < ∞ } , Wτ (C (λ)) = { X : sup n 1 n n∑ m=1 ( 1 λmτm m∑ k=1 |xk| ) < ∞ } , Wτ ( C + (λ) ) = { X : sup n 1 n n∑ m=1 ( 1 τm ∞∑ k=m |xk| λk ) < ∞ } . Note that for λn = n and τ = e, Wτ (∆(λ)) is the well known set of all strongly and bounded sequences c∞. We obtain the following result that is a direct consequence of Lemma 2.1. Proposition 3.1. (i) If τ ∈ Γ then the operators ∆ and Σ are bijective from Wτ into itself and Wτ (∆) = Wτ, Wτ (Σ) = Wτ. (ii) a) If λτ ∈ Γ then Wτ (C (λ)) = Wλτ. b) If τ ∈ Γ then Wτ (∆(λ)) = Wτ/λ. CUBO 12, 3 (2010) Calculations in New Sequence Spaces ... 127 (iii) Let τ ∈ Γ+. Then a) the operators ∆+ and Σ+ are bijective from Wτ into itself and Wτ ( Σ + ) = Wτ. b) the operator C+ (λ) is bijective from Wλτ into Wτ and Wτ ( C + (λ) ) = Wλτ. Proof. (i) By Lemma 2.1 where ρn = τn−1/τn and λn = n for all n, we easily see that if lim n→∞ τn−1 τn < 1 limn→∞ ( n−1 n ) = 1, that is τ ∈ Γ, then D1/τ∆Dτ is bijective from w∞ to itself. This means that ∆ is bijective from Dτw∞ to itself. Since Σ is also bijective from Dτw∞ to itself, this shows Wτ (∆) = Wτ and Wτ (Σ) = Wτ. (ii) We have X ∈ Wτ (C (λ)) if and only if ΣX ∈ Dλτw∞ = Wλτ. This means that X ∈ Wλτ (Σ) and by (i) the condition λτ ∈ Γ implies Wλτ (Σ) = Wλτ. Then Wτ (C (λ)) = Wλτ and C (λ) is bijective from Wλτ to Wτ. Since ∆(λ) = C (λ) −1 we conclude ∆(λ) bijective from Wτ to Wλτ and Wλτ (∆(λ)) = Wτ. We deduce that for τ ∈ Γ, Wτ (∆(λ)) = Wτ/λ. (iii) a) By Lemma 2.1 with ρn = τn+1/τn and λn = n we have ∆ + ρ = D1/τ∆ +Dτ and ∆ + is bijective from Dτw∞ = Wτ into itself for τ ∈ Γ + and it is the same for Σ+. Now the equation Σ + X = Y for Y ∈ Wτ is equivalent to ∞∑ m=n xm = yn for all n. (8) We deduce (8) has a unique solution X = ( yn − yn+1)n≥1 = ∆ +Y ∈ Wτ and Wτ ( Σ + ) = Wτ. b) We have Wτ ( C + (λ) ) = { X : Σ + D1/λ X ∈ Wτ } = DλWτ ( Σ + ) . Now as we have seen above since τ ∈ Γ+ we get Wτ ( Σ + ) = Wτ and Wτ ( C + (λ) ) = DλWτ ( Σ + ) = DλWτ = Wλτ. This gives the conclusion. 128 Bruno de Malafosse & Vladimir Rakočević CUBO 12, 3 (2010) 4 Calculations in New Sequence Spaces 4.1 The sets [C,∆]Wτ , [C, C]Wτ , [ C+,∆ ] Wτ , [ C+, C ] Wτ and [ C+, C+ ] Wτ . In [4], were defined and studied the sets [A1, A2] = [ A1 (λ) , A2 ( µ )] = { X ∈ s : A1 (λ) (∣∣A2 ( µ ) X ∣∣) ∈ Dτl∞ } where |X| = (|xn|)n≥1, A1 and A2 of the form C (ξ), C + (ξ), ∆(ξ), or ∆+ (ξ) for ξ ∈ U+. It was given necessary conditions to get [ A1 (λ) , A2 ( µ )] in the form sγ. Similarly in the following we will put [A1, A2]Wτ = [ A1 (λ) , A2 ( µ )] Wτ = { X ∈ s : A1 (λ) (∣∣A2 ( µ ) X ∣∣) ∈ Wτ } for λ, µ, τ ∈ U+. We can explicitly write the previous sets [A1, A2]Wτ as follows. [C,∆]Wτ = { X : sup n ( 1 n n∑ m=1 1 λmτm m∑ k=1 ∣∣µk xk −µk−1 xk−1 ∣∣ ) < ∞ } , [C, C]Wτ = { X : sup n ( 1 n n∑ m=1 ( 1 λmτm m∑ k=1 1 µk ∣∣∣∣∣ k∑ i=1 xi ∣∣∣∣∣ )) < ∞ } , [ C + ,∆ ] Wτ = { X : sup n ( 1 n n∑ m=1 ( 1 τm ∞∑ k=m 1 λk ∣∣µk xk −µk−1 xk−1 ∣∣ )) < ∞ } , [ C + , C ] Wτ = { X : sup n ( 1 n n∑ m=1 ( 1 τm ∞∑ k=m 1 λk 1 µk ∣∣∣∣∣ k∑ i=1 xi ∣∣∣∣∣ )) < ∞ } , [ C + , C + ] Wτ = { X : sup n ( 1 n n∑ m=1 ( 1 τm ∞∑ k=m 1 λk ∣∣∣∣∣ ∞∑ i=k xi µi ∣∣∣∣∣ )) < ∞ } . Note that if λn = µn for all n we get the well known set of sequences that are strongly bounded [C,∆]We = c∞ (λ). We can state the following. Theorem 4.1. Let λ, µ,τ ∈ U+. (i) If λτ ∈ Γ then [C,∆]Wτ = Wλτ/µ; (ii) if λτ, λµτ ∈ Γ then [C, C]Wτ = Wλµτ; (iii) if τ ∈ Γ+ and λτ ∈ Γ then [ C + ,∆ ] Wτ = Wλτ/µ; CUBO 12, 3 (2010) Calculations in New Sequence Spaces ... 129 (iv) if τ ∈ Γ+ and λµτ ∈ Γ then [ C + , C ] Wτ = Wλµτ; (v) if τ, λτ ∈ Γ+ then [ C + , C + ] Wτ = Wλµτ. Proof. In the following we will use the fact that for any ξ ∈ U+ we have |X| ∈ Wξ if and only if X ∈ Wξ. (i) We have C (λ) (∣∣∆ ( µ ) X ∣∣) ∈ Wτ if and only if ∣∣∆ ( µ ) X ∣∣ ∈ Wτ (C (λ)) and by Proposition 3.1, since λτ ∈ Γ we get Wτ (C (λ)) = Wλτ. Then by Proposition 3.1 (ii) we have Wλτ ( ∆ ( µ )) = Wλτ/µ and we conclude ∆ ( µ ) X ∈ Wλτ if and only if X ∈ Wλτ ( ∆ ( µ )) = Wλτ/µ, that is [C,∆]Wτ = Wλτ/µ. (ii) Here we have C (λ) (∣∣C ( µ ) X ∣∣) ∈ Wτ if and only if ∣∣C ( µ ) X ∣∣ ∈ Wτ (C (λ)); and since λτ ∈ Γ by Proposition 3.1 we have Wτ (C (λ)) = Wλτ. So X ∈ [C, C]Wτ if and only if C ( µ ) X ∈ Wλτ, that is X ∈ Wλτ ( C ( µ )) . Then by Proposition 3.1 (ii) a) λµτ ∈ Γ implies Wλτ ( C ( µ )) = Wλµτ and we have shown (ii). (iii) For any given X ∈ [ C+,∆ ] Wτ we have ∆ ( µ ) X ∈ Wτ ( C+ (λ) ) and for τ ∈ Γ+ we have Wτ ( C+ (λ) ) = Wλτ. Now the condition λτ ∈ Γ implies X ∈ [ C+,∆ ] Wτ if and only if X ∈ Wλτ ( ∆ ( µ )) = Wλτ/µ and we have shown (iii). (iv) Let X ∈ [ C+, C ] Wτ . We have τ ∈ Γ+ implies Wτ ( C+ (λ) ) = Wλτ and so X ∈ [ C+, C ] Wτ if and only if C ( µ ) X ∈ Wλτ. Now since λµτ ∈ Γ we have Wλτ ( C ( µ )) = Wλµτ and we conclude[ C+, C ] Wτ = Wλµτ. (v) As above X ∈ [ C+, C+ ] Wτ if and only if C+ ( µ ) X ∈ Wτ ( C+ (λ) ) and the condition τ ∈ Γ+ implies Wτ ( C+ (λ) ) = Wλτ. Since λτ ∈ Γ + we conclude Wλτ ( C+ ( µ )) = Wλµτ that is [ C+, C+ ] Wτ = Wλµτ. Now we are led to study sets of the form [∆, A2 ]Wτ for A2 ∈ { ∆,∆, C+ } . 4.2 The sets [∆,∆]Wτ , [∆, C]Wτ and [ ∆, C+ ] Wτ Using the convention µ0 = 0, and the notation ∆ ( µ ) xm = µm xm − µm−1 xm−1 for m ≥ 1 we explicitly have [∆,∆]Wτ = { X : sup n ( 1 n n∑ m=1 1 τm ∣∣λm ∣∣∆ ( µ ) xm ∣∣ −λm−1 ∣∣∆ ( µ ) xm−1 ∣∣∣∣ ) < ∞ } , [∆, C]Wτ = { X : sup n ( 1 n n∑ m=1 1 τm ∣∣∣∣∣λm ∣∣∣∣∣ 1 µm m∑ k=1 xk ∣∣∣∣∣ −λm−1 ∣∣∣∣∣ 1 µm−1 m−1∑ k=1 xk ∣∣∣∣∣ ∣∣∣∣∣ ) < ∞ } , 130 Bruno de Malafosse & Vladimir Rakočević CUBO 12, 3 (2010) [ ∆, C + ] Wτ = { X : sup n ( 1 n n∑ m=1 1 τm ∣∣∣∣∣λm ∣∣∣∣∣ ∞∑ k=m xk µk ∣∣∣∣∣ −λm−1 ∣∣∣∣∣ ∞∑ k=m−1 xk µk ∣∣∣∣∣ ∣∣∣∣∣ ) < ∞ } . As a direct consequence of Proposition 3.1 we also obtain the following results. Theorem 4.2. Let λ, µ, τ ∈ U+. Then (i) If τ, τ/λ ∈ Γ then [∆,∆]Wτ = Wτ/λµ. (ii) If τ, τµ/λ ∈ Γ then [∆, C]Wτ = Wτµ/λ. (iii) If τ, τ/λ ∈ Γ+ then [ ∆, C + ] Wτ = Wτµ/λ. Proof. (i) Let X ∈ [∆,∆]Wτ . Since τ ∈ Γ we have Wτ (∆(λ)) = Wτ/λ and ∆(λ) ∣∣∆ ( µ ) X ∣∣ ∈ Wτ means ∆ ( µ ) X ∈ Wτ/λ. We conclude Wτ/λ ( ∆ ( µ )) = Wτ/λµ for τ/λ ∈ Γ. (ii) Reasoning as above since τ ∈ Γ we have X ∈ [∆, C]Wτ if and only if C ( µ ) X ∈ Wτ/λ. We conclude since the condition τµ/λ ∈ Γ implies Wτ/λ ( C ( µ )) = Wτµ/λ. (iii) Here under the conditions τ, τ/λ ∈ Γ+, we have X ∈ [ ∆, C+ ] Wτ if and only if X ∈ Wτ/λ ( C+ ( µ )) = Wτµ/λ. The previous results can be applied to the case when w∞ is replaced by w 0. 4.3 The sets [A1, A2]W 0τ Using the Banach algebra ( w0 (λ) , w0 (λ) ) we get similar results to those given above replacing w∞ (λ) by w 0 (λ) and Wτ by W 0 τ = Dτw 0. Note that X ∈ W 0τ if and only if 1 n n∑ m=1 |xm| τm → 0 (n → ∞) . By [17, Theorem 4.3.6, p. 52] the set W 0τ is a BK space with AK normed by ‖‖Wτ . So we can state the following. Proposition 4.3. Let λ, µ ∈ U+. (i) If λτ ∈ Γ then [C,∆]W0τ = W 0 λτ/µ ; (ii) if λτ, λµτ ∈ Γ then [C, C]W0τ = W 0 λµτ ; (iii) if τ ∈ Γ+ and λτ ∈ Γ then [ C+,∆ ] W0τ = W 0 λτ/µ ; CUBO 12, 3 (2010) Calculations in New Sequence Spaces ... 131 (iv) if τ ∈ Γ+ and λµτ ∈ Γ then [ C+, C ] W0τ = W 0 λµτ ; (v) if τ, λτ ∈ Γ+ then [ C+, C+ ] W0τ = W 0 λµτ ; (vi) if τ, τ/λ ∈ Γ then [∆,∆]W0τ = W 0 τ/λµ ; (vii) if τ, τµ/λ ∈ Γ then [∆, C]W0τ = W 0 τµ/λ ; (viii) if τ, τ/λ ∈ Γ+ then [ ∆, C+ ] W0τ = W 0 τµ/λ . We immediatly get the next remark. Remark 4.4. It can easily be seen that in Proposition 4.3 each of the sets [A1, A2]W0τ is equal to W 0τ (A1 A2). This result is a direct consequence of the previous proofs and of the fact that W 0 τ is of absolute type, that is |X| ∈ W 0τ if and only if X ∈ W 0 τ . These results can be applied to statistical convergence. 5 Application to A−Statistical Convergence In this section we will give conditions to have xk → L (S (A)) where A is either of the infinite matrices D1/τC (λ) C ( µ ) , D1/τ∆(λ)∆ ( µ ) , or D1/τ∆(λ) C ( µ ) . Then we give conditions to have xk → 0 (S (A)) where A is either of the operators D1/τC + (λ)∆ ( µ ) , D1/τC + (λ) C ( µ ) , D1/τC + (λ) C+ ( µ ) and D1/τ∆(λ) C + ( µ ) . The sequence X = (xn)n≥1 is said to be statiscally convergent to the number L if lim n→∞ 1 n |{k ≤ n : |xk − L| ≥ ε}| = 0 for all ε > 0, where the vertical bars indicate the number of elements in the enclosed set. In this case we will write xk → L (S) or st − lim X = L. Let A ∈ (E, F) for given L ∈ C and for every ε > 0 we will use the notation Iε (A) = {k ≤ n : |[A X ]k − L| ≥ ε} , (where we assume that every series [A X ]k = Ak (X ) = ∑ ∞ m=1 akm xm for k ≥ 1 is convergent). We will say that X = (xn)n≥1 is A− statistically convergent to L if for every ε > 0, lim n→∞ 1 n |Iε (A)| = 0. Then we will write xk → L (S ( A)) and for A = I, xk → L (S (I)) means that st − lim X = L, (cf. [6]). Now we require a lemma where we will put T−1 e = l̃ = (l n)n≥1 for given triangle T, that is T = (tnm)n,m≥1 with tnn 6= 0 and tnm = 0 if m > n for all n, m. 132 Bruno de Malafosse & Vladimir Rakočević CUBO 12, 3 (2010) We can state the following. Lemma 5.1. If X − Ll̃ ∈ w0 (T) then xk is T− statistically convergent to L. Proof. The condition X − Ll̃ ∈ w0 (T) means that T ( X − Ll̃ ) ∈ w0. Since T X − Le = T ( X − LT −1 e ) = T ( X − Ll̃ ) for any ε > 0 we have yn = 1 n n∑ k=1 |[T X ]k − L| = 1 n n∑ k=1 ∣∣[T ( X − Ll̃ )] k ∣∣ ≥ 1 n ∑ k∈Iε(T) ∣∣[T ( X − Ll̃ )] k ∣∣ ≥ 1 n ∑ k∈Iε(T) ε ≥ ε n |{k ≤ n : |[T X ]k − L| ≥ ε}|. We conclude that X − Ll̃ ∈ w0 (T) implies yn → 0 (n → ∞) and xk → L (S (T)). We are led to state the next results. Theorem 5.2. (i) Let λτ, λτµ ∈ Γ. If lim n→∞ 1 n n∑ k=1 ∣∣xk − L [ λkµkτk + ( µk−1 +µk ) λk−1τk−1 −λk−2µk−2τk−2 ]∣∣ λkµkτk = 0 (9) then xk → L ( S ( D1/τC (λ) C ( µ ))) , that is for every ε > 0 lim n→∞ 1 n ∣∣∣∣∣ { k ≤ n : ∣∣∣∣∣ 1 λkτk k∑ i=1 1 µi ( i∑ j=1 x j ) − L ∣∣∣∣∣ ≥ ε }∣∣∣∣∣ = 0. (ii) Let τ, τ/λ ∈ Γ. If lim n→∞ 1 n n∑ k=1 λkµk τk ∣∣∣∣∣xk − L ( 1 µk k∑ i=1 1 λi i∑ j=1 τj )∣∣∣∣∣ = 0 then xk → L ( S ( D1/τ∆(λ)∆ ( µ ))) , that is for every ε > 0 lim n→∞ 1 n ∣∣∣∣ { k ≤ n : ∣∣∣∣ 1 τk [ λk∆ ( µ ) xk −λk−1∆ ( µ ) xk−1 ] − L ∣∣∣∣ ≥ ε }∣∣∣∣ = 0. (iii) Let τ, τµ/λ ∈ Γ. If lim n→∞ 1 n n∑ k=1 λk µkτk ∣∣∣∣∣xk − L [( µk λk − µk−1 λk−1 ) k−1∑ i=1 τi + µk λk τk ]∣∣∣∣∣ = 0 CUBO 12, 3 (2010) Calculations in New Sequence Spaces ... 133 then xk → L ( S ( D1/τ∆(λ) C ( µ ))) , that is for every ε > 0 lim n→∞ 1 n ∣∣∣∣∣ { k ≤ n : ∣∣∣∣∣ 1 τk [( λk µk − λk−1 µk−1 ) k−1∑ i=1 xi + λk µk xk ] − L ∣∣∣∣∣ ≥ ε }∣∣∣∣∣ = 0. Proof. (i) First by Proposition 4.3 (ii) and Remark 4.4, we easily see that for λτ, λτµ ∈ Γ we have W 0τ ( C (λ) C ( µ )) = W 0 λµτ . Then putting T = D1/τC (λ) C ( µ ) we get w 0 (T) = W 0 τ ( C (λ) C ( µ )) = W 0 λµτ . (10) Then l̃ = T−1 e = ∆ ( µ ) ∆(λ) Dτ e for each n with l n = [ ∆ ( µ ) ∆(λ) Dτ e ] n = λnµnτn + ( µn−1 +µn ) λn−1τn−1 −λn−2µn−2τn−2 (11) Using (10) and (11) we see that condition (9) is equivalent X − Ll̃ ∈ w0 (T). We conclude by Lemma 5.1 that xk → L (S (T)). This completes the proof of (i). (ii) By Proposition 4.3 (vi) and Remark 4.4, since τ, τ/λ ∈ Γ we have W 0τ ( ∆(λ)∆ ( µ )) = W 0 τ/λµ . Then putting T′ = D1/τ∆(λ)∆ ( µ ) we get w 0 ( T ′ ) = W 0 τ ( ∆(λ)∆ ( µ )) = W 0 τ/λµ . (12) Since l̃′ = T′−1 e = C ( µ ) C (λ) Dτ e we have l ′ n = [ C ( µ ) C (λ) Dτ e ] n = 1 µn n∑ i=1 1 λi ( i∑ j=1 τj ) for all n. By Lemma 5.1 we conclude xk → L ( S ( D1/τ∆(λ)∆ ( µ ))) for all X with lim n→∞ 1 n n∑ k=1 ∣∣xk − Ll′k ∣∣ λkµk τk = 0 This shows (ii). (iii) Again by Proposition 4.3 (vii) and Remark 4.4, since τ, τµ/λ ∈ Γ we have W 0τ ( ∆(λ) C ( µ )) = W 0 τµ/λ . Then putting T ′′ = D1/τ∆(λ) C ( µ ) we get w 0 ( T ′′ ) = W 0 τ ( ∆(λ) C ( µ )) = W 0 τµ/λ . (13) Writing l̃′′ = T ′′ −1 e = ∆ ( µ ) C (λ) Dτ e we successively get Dτ e = (τn)n≥1 , C (λ) Dτ e = (( n∑ i=1 τi ) /λn ) n≥1 and ∆ ( µ ) C (λ) Dτ e = ( µn λn n∑ i=1 τi − µn−1 λn−1 n−1∑ i=1 τi ) n≥1 . 134 Bruno de Malafosse & Vladimir Rakočević CUBO 12, 3 (2010) So for each n we have l ′′ n = [ ∆ ( µ ) C (λ) Dτ e ] n = ( µn λn − µn−1 λn−1 ) n−1∑ i=1 τi + µn λn xk. We conclude that for every X with lim n→∞ 1 n n∑ k=1 ∣∣xk − Ll′′k ∣∣ λk µkτk = 0 then xk → L ( S ( T′′ )) . Finally we easily get [ T ′′ X ] n = 1 τn ( λn µn n∑ i=1 xi − λn−1 µn−1 n−1∑ i=1 xi ) = 1 τn [( λn µn − λn−1 µn−1 ) n−1∑ i=1 xi + λn µn xn ] . This shows (iii). We are led to illustrate the previous results with some examples where we must have in mind that the condition xk/τk → 0 (k → ∞) implies X ∈ W 0 τ . Example 5.3. The condition lim n→∞ 1 n n∑ k=1 ∣∣∣∣ xk 2k − 7 4 L ∣∣∣∣ = 0 for given L ∈ C implies xk → L ( S ( D(n/2n )n C1Σ )) , that is, for each ε > 0 lim n→∞ 1 n ∣∣∣∣∣ { k ≤ n : ∣∣∣∣∣ 1 2k k∑ i=1 i∑ j=1 x j − L ∣∣∣∣∣ ≥ ε }∣∣∣∣∣ = 0. (14) Indeed it is enough to apply Theorem 5.2 (i) with λk = k, τk = 2 k/k and µk = 1 for all k. Note that if xk/2 k → 7L/4 (k → ∞) then xk → L ( S ( D(n/2n )n C1Σ )) . We can also state the next application. Example 5.4. If limn→∞ (1/n) ∑n k=1 |xk|/k2 k = 0 then xk → L ( S ( D(2−n )n ∆C1 )) , that is for each ε > 0 lim n→∞ 1 n ∣∣∣∣∣ { k ≤ n : ∣∣∣∣∣ 1 2k ( 1 k − 1 k − 1 ) k−1∑ i=1 xi + 1 k xk ∣∣∣∣∣ ≥ ε }∣∣∣∣∣ = 0. This result is a direct consequence of Theorem 5.2 (iii) with λk = 1, τk = 2 k and µk = k for all k. Again note that we have xk → L ( S ( D(2−n )n ∆C1 )) if xk/k2 k → 0 (k → ∞). CUBO 12, 3 (2010) Calculations in New Sequence Spaces ... 135 In the following we will use the previous Proposition 4.3 and the expressions of W 0τ ( C+ (λ)∆ ( µ )) = [ C+,∆ ] W0τ , W 0τ ( C+ (λ) C ( µ )) = [ C+, C ] W0τ , W 0τ ( C+ (λ) C+ ( µ )) = [ C+, C+ ] W0τ and W 0τ ( ∆(λ) C+ ( µ )) = [ ∆, C+ ] W0τ . We now require a lemma which is a direct consequence of Lemma 5.1. Lemma 5.5. Let A be an infinite matrix. If X ∈ w0 (A) then xk → 0 (S (A)) . we deduce the next results. Theorem 5.6. (i) Let τ ∈ Γ+ and λτ ∈ Γ. If lim n→∞ 1 n n∑ k=1 |xk| λkτk µk = 0 (15) then xk → 0 ( S ( D1/τC + (λ)∆ ( µ ))) , that is for every ε > 0 lim n→∞ 1 n ∣∣∣∣∣ { k ≤ n : ∣∣∣∣∣ 1 τk ∞∑ i=k µi xi −µi−1 xi−1 λi ∣∣∣∣∣ ≥ ε }∣∣∣∣∣ = 0. (16) (ii) Let τ ∈ Γ+ and λµτ ∈ Γ. If lim n→∞ 1 n n∑ k=1 |xk| λkµkτk = 0 (17) then xk → 0 ( S ( D1/τC + (λ) C ( µ ))) , that is for every ε > 0 lim n→∞ 1 n ∣∣∣∣∣ { k ≤ n : ∣∣∣∣∣ 1 τk ∞∑ i=k 1 λi ( 1 µi i∑ j=1 x j )∣∣∣∣∣ ≥ ε }∣∣∣∣∣ = 0. (18) (iii) Let τ, λτ ∈ Γ+. If lim n→∞ 1 n n∑ k=1 |xk| λkµkτk = 0 (19) then xk → 0 ( S ( D1/τC + (λ) C+ ( µ ))) , that is for every ε > 0 lim n→∞ 1 n ∣∣∣∣∣ { k ≤ n : ∣∣∣∣∣ 1 τk ∞∑ i=k 1 λi ( ∞∑ j=i x j µj )∣∣∣∣∣ ≥ ε }∣∣∣∣∣ = 0. (20) (iv) Let τ, τ/λ ∈ Γ+. If lim n→∞ 1 n n∑ k=1 λk |xk| µkτk = 0 then xk → 0 ( S ( D1/τ∆(λ) C + ( µ ))) , that is for every ε > 0 lim n→∞ 1 n ∣∣∣∣∣ { k ≤ n : 1 τk ∣∣∣∣∣(λk −λk−1) ∞∑ i=k−1 xi µi + λk µk xk ∣∣∣∣∣ ≥ ε }∣∣∣∣∣ = 0. (21) 136 Bruno de Malafosse & Vladimir Rakočević CUBO 12, 3 (2010) Proof. (i) Condition (15) implies X ∈ W 0 λτ/µ and by Proposition 4.3 and Remark 4.4 since τ ∈ Γ+ and λτ ∈ Γ we have W 0 λτ/µ = W 0τ ( C+ (λ)∆ ( µ )) and X ∈ W 0τ ( C+ (λ) ∆ ( µ )) . Now it can be easily seen that [ D1/τC + (λ)∆ ( µ )] n = 1 τn ∞∑ i=n µi xi −µi−1 xi−1 λi , so by Lemma 5.5 with A = D1/τC + (λ)∆ ( µ ) we conclude xk → 0 ( S ( D1/τC + (λ)∆ ( µ ))) . This shows (i). (ii) Here condition (17) means X ∈ W 0 λµτ and by Proposition 4.3 and Remark 4.4 since τ ∈ Γ+ and λµτ ∈ Γ we have W 0 λµτ = W 0τ ( C+ (λ) C ( µ )) and X ∈ W 0τ ( C+ (λ) C ( µ )) . Now since [ D1/τC + (λ) C ( µ )] n = 1 τn ∞∑ i=n 1 λi ( 1 µi i∑ j=1 x j ) , by Lemma 5.5 where A′ = D1/τC + (λ) C ( µ ) , we conclude xk → 0 ( S ( D1/τC + (λ) C ( µ ))) . So we have shown (ii). (iii) can be obtained reasoning as above with A′′ = D1/τC + (λ) C+ ( µ ) and so xk → 0( S ( D1/τC + (λ) C+ ( µ ))) . (iv) can also be obtained similarly. It is enough to put A′′′ = D1/τ∆(λ) C + ( µ ) . An elemen- tary calculation gives [ A ′′′ X ] k = 1 τk [ (λk −λk−1) ∞∑ i=k−1 xi µi + λk µk xk ] and we conclude that xk → 0 ( S ( D1/τ∆(λ) C + ( µ ))) , that is (21). We can state the next example Example 5.7. for each ε > 0 and for every X ∈ W 0 3/2 we have xk → 0 ( S ( D(2n )n Σ +C ((3n)n) )) , that is lim n→∞ 1 n ∣∣∣∣∣ { k ≤ n : ∣∣∣∣∣2 k ∞∑ i=1 1 3i ( i∑ j=1 x j )∣∣∣∣∣ ≥ ε }∣∣∣∣∣ = 0. (22) It is enough to apply Theorem 5.6 (ii) with τk = 2 −k, µk = 3 k and λk = 1 for all k. So if (2/3) k xk → 0 (k → ∞) then (22) holds. We also have the next example. Example 5.8. From Theorem 5.6 (iii) with λk = µk = k and τk = 2 −k the condition lim n→∞ 1 n n∑ k=1 2 k |xk| k2 = 0 CUBO 12, 3 (2010) Calculations in New Sequence Spaces ... 137 implies xk → 0 ( S ( D(2n )n C1C + 1 )) that is, for each ε > 0 lim n→∞ 1 n ∣∣∣∣∣ { k ≤ n : ∣∣∣∣∣2 k ∞∑ i=k 1 i ( ∞∑ j=i x j j )∣∣∣∣∣ ≥ ε }∣∣∣∣∣ = 0. (23) As in the previous cases (23) holds if 2k xk/k 2 → 0 (k → ∞). References [1] ÇOLAK, R., Lacunary strong convergence of difference sequences with respect to a mod- ulus, Filomat, 17 (2003), 9–14. [2] DE MALAFOSSE, B., On some BK space, Int. J. of Math. and Math. Sc., 28 (2003), 1783– 1801. [3] DE MALAFOSSE, B., On the set of sequences that are strongly α-bounded and α- convergent to naught with index p, Seminario Matematico dell’Università e del Politec- nico di Torino, 61 (2003), 13–32. [4] DE MALAFOSSE, B., Calculations on some sequence spaces, Int. J. of Math. and Math. Sc., 31 (2004), 1653–1670. [5] DE MALAFOSSE, B. AND MALKOWSKY, E., The Banach algebra (w∞ (λ) , w∞ (λ)), in press Far East Journal Math. [6] DE MALAFOSSE, B. AND RAKOČEVIĆ, V., Matrix Transformations and Statistical con- vergence, Linear Algebra and its Applications, 420 (2007), 377–387. [7] FAST, H., Sur la convergence statistique, Colloq. Math., 2 (1951), 241–244. [8] FRIDY, J.A., On statistical convergence, Analysis, 5 (1985), 301–313. [9] FRIDY, J.A., Statistical limit points, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 118 (1993), 1187–1192. [10] FRIDY, J.A. AND ORHAN, C., Lacunary statistical convergence, Pacific J. Math., 160 (1993), 43–51. [11] FRIDY, J.A. AND ORHAN, C., Statistical core theorems, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 208 (1997), 520–527. [12] MADDOX, I.J., On Kuttner’s theorem, J. London Math. Soc., 43 (1968), 285–290. [13] MADDOX, I.J., Elements of Functionnal Analysis, Cambridge University Press, London and New York, 1970. 138 Bruno de Malafosse & Vladimir Rakočević CUBO 12, 3 (2010) [14] MALKOWSKY, E., The continuous duals of the spaces c0 (Λ) and c (Λ) for exponentially bounded sequences Λ, Acta Sci. Math (Szeged), 61, (1995), 241–250. [15] MALKOWSKY, E. AND RAKOČEVIĆ, V., An introduction into the theory of sequence spaces and measure of noncompactness, Zbornik radova, Matematčki institut SANU, 9 (17) (2000), 143–243. [16] STEINHAUS, H., Sur la convergence ordinaire et la convergence asymptotique, Colloq. Math., 2 (1951), 73–74. [17] WILANSKY, A., Summability through Functional Analysis, North-Holland Mathematics Studies, 85, 1984.