DJ Mini and Montreal’s Vulgar Dance Music
Dancecult: Journal of Electronic Dance Music Culture 8(1): 26–45
ISSN 1947-5403 ©2016 Dancecult http://dj.dancecult.net
http://dx.doi.org/10.12801/1947-5403.2016.08.01.02
DJ Mini and Montreal’s Vulgar Dance Music
David Madden
Concordia University (Canada)
Abstract
This article advances claims about Montreal’s electronic dance music scene through
mapping the career of one of the key actors who shaped the electroclash scene from
the early 2000s onwards—music producer/DJ Mini (née Evelyne Drouin). By way
of detailing the career of DJ Mini, this text attempts to add to the queer musical
narratives currently emerging from music scene analyses. Counter to the experiences
of many women DJs and musicians participating in heterosexual and male-dominated
music scenes, Drouin received extensive mentoring and support from various informal
queer social networks spread throughout the circuits of the city. Not only did she gain
access to a local production network of equipment and skill sharing, Drouin was also
given access to spaces where she was able to develop production skills on her own time
and at her own pace. DJ Mini’s story offers a telling case for the ways in which the
politics of access—institutional, social, technological—remain central to the vitality
and inclusivity of local music scenes.
Keywords: electroclash; Montreal; DJ Mini; overdose; electronic dance music
David Madden is a soundmaker and Postdoctoral Fellow at Ageing + Communication +
Technologies, Concordia University.
Feature Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12801/1947-5403.2016.08.01.02
Madden | DJ Mini and Montreal’s Vulgar Dance Music 27
Introduction
The aim of this article is to advance claims about Montreal’s electronic dance music scene
through mapping the career of one of the key actors who shaped the electroclash scene
from the early 2000s onwards—music producer/DJ Mini (née Evelyne Drouin). Drouin
spearheaded Overdose, a weekly electroclash party night at Parking Nightclub in the heart
of the city’s Gay Village. While running the night for just over seven years (2002–2009),
Drouin acted as a DJ, entrepreneur, music producer, cultural broker, promoter, graphic
designer and mentor, all of which form the necessary skill set for building and maintaining
a successful professional DJ career, whether locally or internationally. By way of detailing
the career of DJ Mini, this text attempts to add to the queer musical narratives currently
emerging from music scene analyses (Whiteley and Rycenga 2006; Taylor 2008, 2009,
2010; Lawrence 2011), for, as Jodie Taylor argues, the queer subject “is largely forgotten
in subcultural and popular music studies” (2012: 153). While negotiating some of the key
DIY dilemmas of current independent music culture, such as balancing the entrepreneurial
aspects of maintaining a career with the more creative dimensions of music production
and performing, Drouin’s rather rapid rise to prominence in Montreal’s electroclash
scene involved working within various informal queer social networks spread throughout
the circuits of the city. Counter to the experiences of many women DJs and musicians
participating in heterosexual and male-dominated music scenes (see Cohen 1997; Katz
2006; Reitsamer 2011; Gavanas and Reitsamer 2013), Drouin received extensive mentoring
and support from bar and record shop owners, in addition to musical training from more
experienced DJs and music producers working in Montreal’s Gay Village. Not only did she
gain access to a local production network of equipment and skill sharing, Drouin was also
given access to spaces where she was able to develop production skills on her own time and
at her own pace. DJ Mini’s story offers a telling case for the ways in which the politics of
access—institutional, social, technological—remain central to the vitality and inclusivity
of local music scenes.
The second motivation of this article is to challenge certain dominant understandings of
electronic dance music through discussing some of the ways in which Montreal operates as
a centre of electronic dance music production and consumption, beginning with disco in
the 1970s and continuing through the 1980s and 1990s with the development of various
local independent music scenes and the emergence of the Gay Village from the early 1980s
onwards. Dominant histories of electronic dance music have typically been woven by a
“moral geography”, says Will Straw, which tend to selectively emphasize the more rigid and
mechanical Northern European styles of dance music while rooting out and downplaying
its more extravagant and vulgar permutations and expressive possibilities (2008: 114–5).
Some of the more vulgar aspects of electronic dance music include the presence of lush
orchestral adornments (most commonly connected to late 1970s disco and Eurodisco),
the incorporation of female vocal tracks and the mixing of various rock music stylizations.
Though the inclusion of female vocal tracks and rock music stylizations are heavily tied to
http://www.djmini.com/
Dancecult 8(1)28
the aesthetics of electroclash (Madden 2012), all of the aforementioned vulgar elements
of electronic music are tightly connected with Montreal’s dance music history. As Straw
emphasizes, ever since disco’s real or imagined “collapse into vulgarity” and pluralism in the
late 1970s, “broad currents within Western dance music have been shaped by the impulse
to install rationality and militancy as protective walls” against the possibility of this type of
demise; adding: “[T]his has most noticeably been the case within that dance music culture
which flirts regularly with rock music” (1993: 171).
Montreal Scene Setting: From Disco to the Indies
A prominent empirical foundation for this analysis draws from my own experiences within
Montreal’s electroclash scene and a series of semi-structured interviews I conducted with
Drouin in 2011 and 2012. During the interviews, we discussed her personal history with
music as a producer, DJ and entrepreneur, among other threads.1 The qualitative data
collected through this participation in Montreal’s electronic music scene(s) in the 2000s
is discussed in relation to scholarly literature on music scenes (Straw 1991, 2004; Grenier
1993; Taylor 2012), electronic music (Straw 1993, 2008; Rodgers 2010), Montreal
(Remiggi 1998; Stahl 2001; Straw 2005; Stolarick and Florida 2006) and DJ and club
culture (Thornton 1995, Fickentscher 2000; Katz 2007). Research into various local music
scenes has a long and highly developed history within popular music studies and cultural
studies, dating back to at least the late 1980s and early 1990s with the work of Straw (1991),
Barry Shank (1994) and, later, Holly Kruse (2003), among others. The concept was initially
deployed as a way to move beyond the limitations of the term (musical) community, which
implied a degree of uniformity somewhat at odds with the variety of musical practices
and expressions emerging within urban centres at the time (Straw 1991: 368). An early
foundational definition of scene comes from Straw, who writes: “[A] musical scene . . .
is that cultural space in which a range of musical practices coexist, interacting with each
other within a variety of processes of differentiation, and according to widely varying
trajectories of change and cross-fertilization” (1991: 373). The concept of the scene has
been particularly useful when mobilized vis-à-vis the ways in which music and a plurality
of music-related practices emerge, interact and circulate within particular cities and spaces
as well as globally, and it is for these reasons that scene is employed throughout this text in
relation to electroclash. Furthermore, as Taylor argues, the notion of the scene is particularly
useful when discussing “queer music-oriented collective formations” as the “heterogeneity
of scene as an analytical tool allows for multiple points of orientation” (2012: 148). Scene
is used to denote various electroclash-related practices throughout Montreal, in addition to
smaller, more defined “clusters of social and cultural activity” within the city (Straw 2004:
412). This article is primarily concerned with the ways in which local street-level activities
and institutions (e.g., bars, nightclubs, record stores) produced and sustained the coming
together of rock and electro in Montreal in the late 1990s and early 2000s.
Madden | DJ Mini and Montreal’s Vulgar Dance Music 29
Before moving on to the contributions of Drouin vis-à-vis electroclash, I introduce some
important historical developments in Montreal and Quebec that helped set the context
for the emergence of the electroclash scene in Montreal at the turn of the millennium. I
begin by briefly presenting some broader, current statistics on the Montreal region that
may suggest why Montreal continues to develop as a centre for cultural production, art and
music, while providing more contextual information for readers who are unfamiliar with
the city’s cultural makeup. Montreal is one of the twenty-five most populous metropolitan
areas in USA and Canada and it is third in terms of population density, after Boston and
New York (Stolarick and Florida 2006: 1802). As Stolarick and Florida write, of the twenty-
five most populous cities, Montreal has the second-highest percentage of people working
in the “super-creative core”, which the authors define as those working in the following
disciplines: “computers, mathematics, architecture, engineering, life sciences, physical
sciences, social sciences, education, training, library, arts, design entertainment, and media”
(2006: 1802). Stolarick and Florida argue that the combination of “density and creative-
class employment” create the ideal cultural and economic context for which “innovations
generated by the interactions between individuals are more likely to occur” (2006: 1799).
One of the key claims that the authors draw from their research on the driving mechanisms
of urban economic development is that creative production flourishes and increases in
places like Montreal, where there are high numbers of artists and creative workers regularly
meeting and engaging with each other (2006: 1801).
Even though Stolarick and Florida’s study makes important connections between
economic growth and creative workers, their work largely focuses on developments within
Montreal from the 2000s onwards—when Montreal’s indie music scene began taking
shape and receiving international attention thanks to artists such as Godspeed You! Black
Emperor and Arcade Fire, and with the establishment of the annual Pop Montreal music
festival, which began in 2002. However, it should be noted that many of the important local
conditions that enabled the emergence of electroclash materialized much earlier. Dating
back to the city’s prominent disco scene of the 1970s, Montreal has long been known
for an intermixing of nightlife culture and dance music. Entrepreneurs (label owners,
DJs, nightclub owners, etc.) capitalized on Montreal’s infrastructure of discotheques
leftover from the 1960s and the city’s heritage and reputation as an epicentre of nighttime
entertainment, activity and sin throughout most of the twentieth century (Stahl 2001).
In the 1970s, the city emerged as one of the most robust markets for the consumption of
disco, whether at nightclubs or through the sales of records and the production of disco,
as many local record companies began producing and distributing their music throughout
Europe and the Americas in the closing years of the 1970s (Straw 2005: 190). In 1979,
at the moment of disco’s commercial peak right before the music’s international collapse,
Billboard magazine deemed Montreal “the second most important disco market on the
continent, outside New York” (as cited in Straw 2008: 118).
The rather rapid decline of disco’s popularity coincided with the global music industry’s
first major crisis in thirty years, after a period of unprecedented growth and rationalization
Dancecult 8(1)30
between 1973 and 1978 (Grenier 1993: 210). In the aftermath of the international crisis,
Quebec continued producing large quantities of dance music records, particularly of the
Eurodisco and Italo-disco variety, even if many producers and distributors attempted
to disguise the origins of their assemblage, fearing that the records might be perceived
as coming from the wrong place. Straw writes that Quebec disco labels and performers
“cultivated a deliberate vagueness about their identities”, which continued the tradition of
Canadian and Quebec “cultural commodities to hide (or, at the very least, downplay) their
origins, to look as if they came from more credible centres of cultural authority” (2008:
118–9). Between the mid -1970s and the early 1980s, Quebec operated as one of the biggest
international centres of production for dance music recordings, and in particular 12-inch
vinyl dance singles. Notable local players included the Parapluie group of labels, producer
and distributor Vincent De Giorgio, and disco performers such as Karen Silver, Patsy
Gallant and Suzy Q (Straw 2008: 118–9).
As Quebec’s largely Francophone music industry started producing signs of rejuvenation
roughly six years after the crisis (Grenier 1993: 212), Montreal’s Anglophone and Allophone
music-makers remained disproportionately underrepresented within the Quebec
industry until the 1990s. However, since this article seems to be setting up a misleading
Anglophone/Francophone division within Montreal and Quebec’s musical culture at large,
I will offer some clarifications before moving forward.2 There were many Anglophone
and Allophone musicians/artists performing and recording in Quebec in the 1980s and
1990s; however, they were not signed to the Francophone-controlled labels that Grenier
(1993) discusses. And, while the music and artists represented by these Franco-indie labels
were almost exclusively Francophone, some Anglophone musicians were key players in
shaping the sounds that emerged from these Quebec labels in the 1980s and 1990s. The
guitarist Rick Haworth, for instance, played on and/or produced many of the popular or
hit albums released by the label Audiogram, including the works of Paul Piché, Michel
Rivard and Daniel Bélanger. Going further, Grenier speculates that some of the people who
had previously worked in the Montreal offices of the Anglo-controlled transnationals and
major labels that closed during the crisis of the 1980s ended up working for the new local
independent Francophone labels.3
On a personal note, when I first moved to Montreal in the late 1990s to pursue
undergraduate studies, my impression of the city was that it lacked the necessary infrastructure
and smaller performance venues to accommodate the high number of musicians moving to
the city annually. Between 1995 and 1999, though there was a very limited selection of legal
venues in downtown Montreal that catered to musical groups, many of these establishments
maintained pay-to-play policies that inhibited the sustainability and growth of local live
music. Pay-to-play arrangements typically involve musicians paying a service fee to a venue
in exchange for the chance to perform. Performing musicians in such arrangements also
tend to be responsible for all promotional material (e.g., making posters and flyers), hiring
a door person to collect cover or admission charges, in addition to guaranteeing the venue
a sizable attendance turnout. Furthermore, the venue and the musicians usually agree upon
Madden | DJ Mini and Montreal’s Vulgar Dance Music 31
a monetary penalty if the minimum number of attendees is not reached. This might explain
why a lot of live musical activity in downtown Montreal in the 1990s seemed to take place
in semi-legal lofts, warehouses and apartments.
By 2000, more legal venues that did not require musicians to pay for the chance to play
began opening up in areas such as Mile End and on or near the upper Main, where, at the
time, commercial and residential rental prices were noticeably cheaper than those of the
lower Main.4 The best-known example of this is the restaurant/music venue Casa del Popolo,
which was opened by Montreal musicians Mauro Pezzente and Kiva Stimac in 2000, an
establishment that maintains solid bookings of traditional musical ensembles and DJs and
a range of other cultural activities, including book launches and poetry readings. Venues
like Casa, in addition to many other legal and semi-legal performance spaces, such as lofts
and warehouses, started accommodating the city’s ever-expanding population of musicians
and performers; some of whom, like me, “moved here to study” in the 1990s “and stayed
to make music”, as Geoff Stahl puts it (2001: 104). Like Stahl, Richard Florida attributes
part of this robust sociomusical economy to the relocation by North American musicians
to Montreal in the 2000s looking to capitalize on the city’s relatively low rental rates—both
in terms of living spaces and the availability of rehearsal spaces—and the city’s venerable
reputation as a centre of cultural production and activity (2011: 2). According to Florida’s
more recent work charting the ongoing geographic changes of the popular music industry,
Montreal currently has the third highest “concentration of music business establishments”
behind Nashville and Los Angeles, which includes distributors, record companies, recording
studios and publishers (2011: 1). Of course, the presence and continued development of the
interrelated and pluralistic, yet highly distinct, Anglophone and Francophone music scenes
is one of the main reasons why the city has such a high concentration of infrastructure for
music-related practices.
Post-Millenial Montreal and Electroclash
At the turn of the millennium, Montreal’s new legal venues and nightclubs also started
housing many of the city’s electronic dance music party nights, including electroclash
events, partly as a consequence of the increasing regulations directed towards raves in the
late 1990s. These regulations helped create a temporal shift in consumption, from the
afterhours of rave scenes and afterhours clubs, to the hours of the night regulated by alcohol
licensing laws. Charity Marsh argues that “the entire raving phenomenon became an object
of concern to be researched and studied by municipal authorities, the police force, health
care workers, various media, and public intellectuals” in the late 1990s and early 2000s
(2006: 416). In Toronto, the increase in rave surveillance and research led to such measures
as Bill 73, which “attempted to dissolve rave culture”, as Marsh writes, by calling for “a
licensing for all venues, building safety code regulations, fire codes, unrestricted access to
water, the need for toilets and fresh air, food services, security, paid duty officers, ambulance
services, drug and health education, communication with city authorities, a definition of
rave, and the periodic review of recommendations” (2006: 424). In her Foucauldian analysis
Dancecult 8(1)32
of Toronto’s rave culture, Marsh is careful to point out, however, that ravers were willing
participants in the regulation process and became “ensnared by their own self-disciplining
techniques” (2006: 428). Similar regulatory strategies were pursued in Montreal, largely
through modifications to existing alcohol licensing laws and the enforcement of municipal
fire codes by the Montreal Police Service and local firefighters (Maari 2009). Yet, in spite of
these regulations against afterhours parties and raves, Billboard magazine marked Montreal
Canada’s “hotspot” of EDM culture in 2001 (LeBlanc 2001: 79).
This move away from afterhours partying required a different soundscape as the more
epic techno and house musics that DJs had been spinning at raves and afterhours clubs were
no longer suitable to the new setting and earlier hours. This transition is best represented
musically with Tiga’s Mixed Emotions: Montreal Mix Sessions Volume 5, which was released
in 2000. Montreal’s Tiga spent most of the peak moments of electroclash in the early-to-mid
2000s developing an international career (i.e., primarily outside of Montreal) as a DJ and
producer, primarily through the success of a co-produced cover of Corey Hart’s “Sunglasses
at Night” (2001)—one of the biggest hits of electroclash. Tiga was heavily involved
as a pioneering force in Montreal and within the larger electronic dance music scene in
Canada and Europe since at least the mid-1990s. The DJ/producer is generally credited
with organizing the first rave in Canada (1993’s Solstice, which was held in Montreal), in
addition to establishing Montreal’s first afterhours club (Sona), and DNA Records, the first
electronic dance music retail store in Montreal (Girard 2011: 109). In 1998, he also started
a record label (Turbo Recordings), which continues to operate within the international
circuits of EDM culture.
By the end of the 1990s, Tiga had grown tired and burnt-out from DJing at raves and
afterhours clubs throughout the decade and was looking to spin more regularly between
12:00 AM and 3:00 AM. He started DJing at Pub Quartier Latin, a club located a few
blocks east of the lower Main, where he introduced dancers to a new set of sounds, including
some of the tracks from Mixed Emotions: Montreal Mix Sessions Volume 5. As a DJ, Tiga
acts simultaneously as a connoisseur of tastes and as a cultural broker. The Mixed Emotions
release pulls together rarities from Tiga’s crate-digging practice while attempting to solidify
cuts for the emerging late-night dance floor. The double CD is perhaps best understood
as representing a transitional moment in electronic dance music, with “Disc 1” (Montreal
Mix Sessions Volume 5) devoted to passing sounds and with “Disc 2” (Bonus Electro Funk
CD) comprised of the new proto-electroclash sounds to come. The mix is caught between
shifting cycles of EDM, from the big room techno and house Tiga played at raves and
afterhours clubs to more electro-oriented dance musics played before 3:00 AM.
Tiga also provides an interesting entry point into the particular personality-driven
gender play, cross-dressing and celebrated sexuality that is at the centre of electroclash.
Throughout the years when electroclash operated as a dominant form of electronic dance
music (2001–2004), Tiga’s gender performance was marked by a mix of sexual identities
and gender-bending, both in the aesthetic choices he made as a music producer and the
imagery and artwork that accompanied his releases. The cover artwork for Mixed Emotions:
http://turborecordings.com/
http://risingdigitalshop.com/tiga/Tiga - Mixed Emotions.jpg
Madden | DJ Mini and Montreal’s Vulgar Dance Music 33
Montreal Mix Sessions Volume 5 pictures a close up photo/illustration of Tiga wearing an
androgynous wig and lipstick—referencing a mix of David Bowie’s 1970s gender-bending
period and Soft Cell’s Marc Almond—with the text written in soft pink and purple. The
back cover of the CD shows Tiga standing profile in a bathtub with his head cropped out of
the photograph, sporting nothing other than a pair of black underwear and a pronounced
erection. Most of the press coverage from this period featured a shirtless Tiga looking rather
boyish in tight black.
At the turn of the twentieth century, as electroclash party nights started moving to
nightclubs and bars and away from afterhours, warehouses and lofts, consumption and
performance practices began changing as well. While the genre incorporated many stylistic
elements of rock, including its song structural elements and backbeat-driven energy,
electroclash club nights, parties and performances imported many of the live practices
normally associated with staged rock and pop performances. As Simon Reynolds writes:
This new (nu?) generation have abandoned the very ethos of Ecstasy culture: the
principles of egalitarian unity and ‘only connect’, the notion of shedding your ego
in the hypnotic flow of the music and merging with the crowd, and the ‘in the mix’
aesthetic that treats tracks [as] anonymous components for the DJ’s seamless montage.
Instead, nu-wave electro-pop songs (known as Electroclash) compete to stand out,
through domineering vocals, larger-than-life singers (as opposed to the depersonalised
diva-as-raw material approach in most modern dance), witty lyrics, and extravagant
amounts of obscenity and trash talk (as cited in Girard 2011: 115).
In the early 2000s, it was not uncommon for electroclash events to be housed at more rock-
oriented venues or theatres with stages, with audiences starting to face the DJ, producer
or performer, who was very often showcased facing the audience on a stage. These parties
were also typically marked by the increased consumption of alcohol and cocaine—rather
than ecstasy, MDMA and speed, known for their associations with rave culture—a certain
gender ambiguity and a corresponding change in dress to skinny ripped jeans, tight T-shirts
and heavy makeup, an attire often worn by both men and women.
Previous to these developments, electronic dance music DJs and performers usually took
more of an anonymous stance in a live setting, even if they were high profile DJs and/
or producers. In the mid-1990s, rave DJs were typically obscured by flashing lights, with
party attendees dispersed in various places on the dance floor, facing and moving in every
direction. Although DJs were very often the featured draw of raves and club nights in the
1990s, with their names prominently displayed on promotional materials, including flyers
and posters, party attendees would generally not watch or even face DJs as they performed
their sets. For example, this is how Sarah Thornton (1995) contextualizes British dance
music clubs in the 1990s and the role of the DJ:
What authenticates contemporary dance cultures is the buzz or energy which results
from the interaction of records, DJ and crowd. ‘Liveness’ is displaced from the stage to
the dance floor, from worship of the performer to a veneration of ‘atmosphere’ or ‘vibe’.
Dancecult 8(1)34
The DJ and dancers share the spotlight as de facto performers; the crowd becomes a
self-conscious cultural phenomenon (29). . . . Though DJs may be musicians, they are
rarely performers in the pop sense of the word. In purpose-built clubs, mixing booths
tend to be tucked away and DJs unseen. As cultural figures, DJs are known by name
rather than face (65).
With the emergence of electroclash in the late 1990s and early 2000s, there was a movement
away from the dance music liveness that Thornton discusses. The atmosphere or vibe remained
the most important element of an event or party; however, DJs and performers took more of
the spotlight as the cult of personality ethos of rock and pop music seemed to arrive alongside
the grittier timbres of the backbeats. Electroclash DJs and performers started participating in
“the trafficking in performer identity and poetic vision that have marked other musical forms
(like rock or soul)”, as Straw writes (2008: 129). Around this time, electroclash DJs and
performers regularly used microphones for interacting with audiences, perhaps drawing on
the live performance practices of hip hop, while the requisite technical precision of seamless
cross-fades and beat-matching associated with house and techno DJs was often replaced by
rougher mixing techniques. Electroclash sets seemed to play out in more of an identifiable
track-to-track fashion, much like a rock or pop show, rather than the throbbing consistency
associated with house music, techno and raves in the 1990s.
These emerging production and consumption practices were perhaps most strongly and
regularly exhibited in Montreal at DJ Mini’s Overdose nights. Much like the “subcultural lore”
emerging from Montreal’s disco scene in the 1970s (Straw 2005: 191), when electroclash
started circulating throughout various nightclubs in the late 1990s and early 2000s, the
genre was perceived as having a natural affinity with the city’s pre-existing cultural fabric(s).
And like disco, electroclash mixed and circulated in Montreal with a certain amount of ease
in many social contexts and neighbourhoods, in part because it was not easily categorized
as exclusively Francophone or Anglophone, and as neither straight nor gay. In musical
terms, this ambiguity is most prominently present in the vocalizations of electroclash.
Although much of the lyrical content of the genre is in English, electroclash vocal tracks
are often sung with a developed sense of irony and disguised by various digital effects such
as a vocoder, which arguably draws listeners and dancers to the materiality of the vocal
utterances and phrasing rather than the linguistic content or subject matter of the lyrics
(see Weheliye 2002). This connects electroclash to a long history of electronic dance music
and, in particular, Eurodisco (and dub), which very regularly employs “highly codified,
minimal units of English speech: ‘orders, announcements (including self-announcements),
greetings, lists, simple reports (‘red alert!’)’ and so on” (Kronengold, quoted in Straw 2008:
129). These discreet units of English are also typically deployed in highly repetitive phrases.
For instance, Tiga and Finnish producer Jori “Zyntherius” Hulkkonen’s aforementioned
“Sunglasses at Night”, a cover version of Corey Hart’s 1983 release with the same title,
leads with an easy-to-follow ABAB song structure, or verse followed by chorus. Tiga
and Zyntherius eliminated the original cut’s eight bar pre-chorus employed to set up the
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fw6k0kMVcCI
Madden | DJ Mini and Montreal’s Vulgar Dance Music 35
release of the chorus, and, as a result, the whole track moves back-and-forth between two
alternating lyrical refrains, which are sung by Tiga with slight variations: part A, “I wear my
sunglasses at night/So I can/So I can/Watch you weave then breath your story lines”; and
part B, “Don’t masquerade with a guy in shades oh no”. By cutting out Hart’s pre-chorus,
Tiga and Zyntherius’ version maintains the same synthesizer progression throughout the
track, as Hart’s move to the pre-chorus is the only harmonic change in the original song.
DJ Mini and Overdose
Aside from the role of the producer, the DJ is perhaps the most masculine professional role
in electronic dance music. In scholarly studies of DJ culture over the last twenty-five years,
women DJs are most notable for their absence. In Katz’s (2007) analysis of battle DJs, for
instance, “the vast majority” are men, whether working locally or touring internationally;
Fikentscher argues that women DJs number less than ten percent (2000: 33); and Straw
(1993) notes that while electronic dance music draws much of its political credibility
through its connections to marginalized sexual (and ethnic) communities, “virtually all
of the club DJs in the English-speaking world who exercise influence are male” (173).
Going further, Straw adds, “there are more women in heavy metal bands than there are
female producers or mixers of dance records” (1993: 173). While this article recognizes
the importance of detailing the lack of female participation and representation as DJs
(and producers) within electronic dance music culture, it should be emphasized that these
statistics can be misleading and somewhat arbitrary if the studies that contain them do not
analyze the social and cultural factors that produce such numbers. DJ Mini benefitted from
a local mixed queer network of people working in various music-related clusters of street-
level activity—from bars and nightclubs to record stores and domestic studio spaces—who
acted as mentors and collaborators throughout her career trajectory. By peering into these
smaller local networks of musical activity, it seems that the number of women working
with electronic sound changes significantly, especially in comparison to the number of
women featured in electronic music magazines or represented on record labels or at major
electronic music festivals.
Drouin’s move from the periphery to the centre of Montreal’s electronic dance music
scene in the city’s Gay Village at Parking in the 2000s began when her family relocated from
Rimouski, QC, to Montreal when she was sixteen. Although she did not have any formal
music training or any plans to produce music, Drouin developed an interest in electronic
music after attending raves throughout the city. In her own words:
I wasn’t really planning to make music in general until I discovered electronic music
at raves and then I got really involved with it. . . . I started going to raves and getting
interested in drum ‘n’ bass, and I have a feeling it’s because of the frequencies, there’s
so much low-end, the bass is really present and melodic and percussive.5
Drouin’s pedagogical path to becoming a DJ after her initial experiences at raves started
while working at a local club, Bluedog, located on the Main, and known for its queer nights
Dancecult 8(1)36
in the late 1990s and early 2000s. The manager of the club recognized Drouin’s developed
interest in DJing and electronic music, and allowed her to use the club’s DJ/sound equipment
during the day when the club was closed and during the early hours of the night when there
were few patrons in attendance. The manager also mentored and trained Drouin as a DJ, in
addition to buying the emerging artist some records and a record bag. Mini’s development
from a beginner DJ with no equipment of her own to a respected working DJ happened
relatively quickly (three-to-four years), largely through her commitment to learning various
musical techniques, by connecting with networks of other working DJs within the city and
through receiving mentoring by more experienced DJs and producers. As Drouin continued
to play a variety of nights at Bluedog, DJs who recognized her talent and commitment to
the practice started inviting her to DJ at other bars and clubs.
One very experienced professional DJ who spent many years spinning in the Gay Village
offered her work in the record shop that he owned, while also teaching her more advanced
DJ techniques and introducing her to the DJ circuits of the Village. Before being able to
fully support themselves through DJ gigs and/or studio production work, DJs often work
in record stores or in musical equipment shops in order to help pay for the heavy capital
investment required to become a DJ, as the stores would most likely give their employees a
rebate on all in-store purchases, including records and DJ equipment. When Drouin first
started DJing nearly twenty years ago, in order to be taken seriously by their peers, aspiring
DJs had to develop extensive vinyl collections, both for practice purposes and for gigs/
performances, while also having to acquire two highly specialized vinyl players or turntables,
a mixer, headphones and two speakers as necessities of the trade. In the 1990s, before the
post-millennial move to primarily using less expensive burned CDs with MP3s in DJ sets,
the industry standard for DJing usually included two Technics SL-1200 vinyl players, which
could be obtained for approximately $700 CAD new, or $400 CAD used. New 12-inch
vinyls cost approximately $15 CAD, and used vinyl records could range from $3 to $5
CAD. Based on recent conversations with professional DJs in Montreal, a relatively small
vinyl collection for a working DJ in the 1990s might have contained about two thousand
records; a bigger collection might consist of ten thousand records and beyond.
As stated above, DJ Mini ran Overdose every Thursday for just over seven years at Parking
Nightclub (which is no longer in operation). The club was situated on Amherst, just south
of Sainte-Catherine Street in the heart of what many consider to be the largest Gay Village
in North America (Straw and Tallack 2009: 4). After many of Montreal’s gay establishments
moved from the city’s west-end downtown core in the early 1980s, the Village developed
rather quickly in Montreal, following the openings of the bar Au Deux R in February of
1982 and la taverne Normandie, the bar KOX and the nightclub Max in 1983 (Remiggi
1998: 269). By January of 1992, only ten years after the opening of Au Deux R, sixty-five
out of the one hundred professionals and commercial establishments listed in Fugues (le
magazine des gais et lesbiennes du Québec) were concentrated in the neighbourhood, and
in particular along Sainte-Catharine (Remiggi 1998: 272). Since the 1990s, the area has
continued to develop a strong residential core, in addition to building on its commercial
infrastructure of cafés, stores, restaurants, nightclubs and bars.
Madden | DJ Mini and Montreal’s Vulgar Dance Music 37
Because Drouin’s Overdose nights were hosted on Parking’s mixed night, there was a
highly articulated crossing of genders and sexualities. On mixed nights, gay clubs typically
allow heterosexual men and women to enter as long as the door person or bouncer decides
that they meet the club’s criteria for entrance, whether these involve dress codes or vibes.
In contrast, on Friday and Saturday nights at Parking, it was much more difficult for those
who identify as straight—or those who were “coded” as straight—to gain admittance to the
club. On weekends, gaining entrance to the club was perhaps most difficult for heterosexual
women. These types of door policies or gatekeeping mechanisms have historically been
put in place in order to maintain a homosocial environment and to protect various gay
scenes from acts of homophobia, violence and surveillance. In Montreal, for instance,
before moving east in the early 1980s, many of the city’s west-end gay establishments along
Stanley, Peel and the lower Main were targeted in the 1970s during “une campagne de
nettoyage préolympique”, as Remiggi writes (1998: 276). Although the “cleaning” was not
exclusively directed at Montreal’s gay bars, these establishments faced consistent harassment
and surveillance by the State throughout much of the 1970s and into the early 1980s.
When Drouin first started to DJ at Parking Nightclub in the early 2000s, the
abovementioned mixing at Overdose was not yet present. In its original incarnation, Overdose
was much more geared towards gay men and was first established around another DJ
(Frigid), who specialized in glam rock and 1990s alternative music. According to Drouin,
when she was initially brought in to DJ once per month at Parking, the Thursday night
was “originally very, very queer and very glam”. I asked Drouin how she eventually started
running Overdose and this is how she responded:
I saw that the night was going down, and I thought to myself, this has got to be
something else. So why not, why don’t I take over. I’ve worked in bars before, I’ve done
nights, I’ve done promotion and I know how the system works and the electroclash
sound is obviously picking up, so why not push it a little bit further. So I sat down with
the owners and I made a business proposal. I basically explained what I would do and
the people I would hire.
Building on her previous experiences DJing and working at Bluedog as a bartender,
promoter and manager, Mini would go on to perform two full nights per month, which
generally meant spinning for four hours at a time. She would also alternate between inviting
one international DJ (e.g., Ellen Allien, Richie Hawtin, Felix Da Housecat) and one local
guest DJ per month, and thereby beginning the process of acting as a mentor to younger
DJs in Montreal. Additionally, Drouin handled all of the bookings, hired much of the bar
staff and brought in all of the people for the promotions team, which was initially funded
and supported by the proprietors of Parking. Cover charges typically ranged from $5–$10
throughout the seven years that Mini ran the night, with anywhere from 350–1200 people
coming through the club on any given Thursday.
Drouin also created a mix CD to both pull together and articulate some of the disparate
styles that form electroclash—from rock to more techno-inspired dance musics—in
Dancecult 8(1)38
addition to using the mix as a strategic promotional tool, drawing attention to her new
conception of the Overdose night and to her emerging practice as a DJ. Drouin personally
burned all copies of the mix CD before distributing them to retail stores, bars and to other
DJs throughout downtown Montreal. As she puts it, the mix was a “turning point” for the
new “mixed” Overdose night:
I made a mix for people to discover what the sound of the night was going to be. And
I got that printed and then distributed in all of the music shops and all of the clothing
stores in Montreal. But the CD was originally just for promo, in order to get people
involved in my nights.
In this way, a mix CD operates as a branding tool for Drouin and other DJs where the real
gains are perhaps better understood in relation to accumulating a certain level of cultural
status or capital within a scene, rather than directly gaining economic profits through
CD sales and distribution. Drouin’s mix CD was primarily distributed free of charge and
functioned as a way to establish a relationship with an audience through a mutually agreed
upon set of aesthetic conventions and desires.
Drouin realized that her Overdose night at Parking might be sustainable when the mix
was launched and performed as a live DJ set:
The night we did the launch of the CD . . . there was water dripping on us and people
were going crazy. It was also the turning point, where we actually knew what the sound
was, and where we actually got to know the crowd. On the mix CD there was Miss
Kittin, Felix Da Housecat, some more underground things, and I think it had Peaches
and Gonzales in there as well.
What is perhaps most interesting about the above remarks is the implicit understanding
that the success or failure of a recorded mix is largely determined by the response from
an audience and the degree to which a DJ is able to maintain an audience for future
performances and gigs. Without a strong response from an audience, a mix CD very quickly
becomes just another form of discarded ephemera collecting dust on shelves, apartment
floors and computer hard drives. Additionally, it is important to point out that for Drouin,
ADULT.’s track “Nausea”, released by the Detroit label Ersatz Audio in 2000 and included
on the mix CD, best represents electroclash, which she describes as “bitchy, square, fully
synthetic music with a loud, obnoxious singer over it, singing with a lot of attitude”.
Yet, just as Drouin’s Overdose emerged as one of the most successful electronic dance
music nights in Montreal—in part, because of the heavy rotation of electroclash—a stylistic
shift was required to sustain the party. One of the consequences of spinning the latest EDM
styles and bringing internationally known DJs to perform at Overdose once every month,
is that it puts the night, and Montreal’s electroclash scene in general, directly in contact
with the shifting cycles of electronic dance music, which is marked by a “rapidity of cyclical
change” (Straw 1991: 382). Staying relevant and maintaining a connection vis-à-vis these
quickly changing cycles and international dance music culture as a whole requires a local
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GqfwIKAMoE
Madden | DJ Mini and Montreal’s Vulgar Dance Music 39
party night like Overdose to constantly shift its stylistic focus by incorporating related
emerging sounds that are gaining popularity elsewhere. Towards the mid-2000s, electroclash
was shortened to electro and the vulgar stylizations were replaced by a more pronounced
techno-oriented and instrumental sensibility (Madden 2012).
EDM dance floors began to pushback against the perceived vulgarity of electroclash,
as the celebrated glamour, ambiguity, rock orientations and sexuality of the genre were
interpreted as stylistic adornments lacking in substance, especially in relation to the more
austere historical authenticity of techno. Music journalist Martin Turenne, for instance,
reported in Exclaim! (“Canada’s music authority”) that with electroclash, electronic
dance music “has been overtaken by style mavens with little concern for the intricacies of
their new found pet sound” (2006). In a similar vein, Brent Luvaas argues that ultimately
“the point” of electroclash “is a glamour-obsessed, nostalgic exhibition put on by people
more concerned with style than substance” (2006: 173). Progressively, the vocally driven
sounds of Peaches’ “Fuck the Pain Away” and Miss Kittin & The Hacker’s “Frank Sinatra”
played at the turn of the millennium were ousted on dance floors by more techno-leaning
instrumental cuts like Alter Ego’s “Rocker”, which was released in 2004.
This international techno-shift meant that Drouin and the other local DJs performing at
Overdose had to incorporate more techno-sounding styles into their sets or risk appearing
out of touch with the most current cycles and styles of electronic dance music. As Drouin
suggests:
For me, eventually, when electroclash started fading away a little bit and people were
kind of tired of hearing that sound, obviously, to keep the night going I moved into a
more techno, straight up, four-on-the-floor sound. . . . It was a really slow transition.
Originally, the first three years were very rock and more queer, and eventually the
night moved into more of a Berlin sound, a little bit more tech-house, a little bit more
techno and towards the end it was pretty much techno.
However, moving in more of a techno direction in the mid-2000s also caused Overdose
to slowly recede into the local electronic dance music scene as one of many techno nights
littered throughout various neighbourhoods in the city. As a musical form that was very
personality-driven, electroclash allowed a DJ persona to develop in an extravagant fashion
that was not so easily available with techno. Not only did Drouin have to reestablish her
“signature sound” and look, as she refers to it, the DJ had to further develop skill sets, such as
studio production, in order to continue making a living as a performing musical practitioner,
given that Overdose slowly started making less and less money. As she emphasizes, “eventually
I realized that if I want to survive, I have to make more music. And I decided to make an
album”. As the night began declining in popularity in the late 2000s, it became clear to
Drouin that Overdose would again need to be totally relaunched and reconceptualized to
remain operating at Parking. One of the drawbacks of hosting a party night in such a large
club, which holds well over five hundred people at any given moment, is that the venue
needs to be close to capacity for the night to seem successful and profitable. Unfortunately,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zp3nURYsedg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GeLw1iFoXho
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqafcAWlHQ0
Dancecult 8(1)40
the moment that Drouin realized that Overdose needed this complete restaging was also
the moment that she lost the desire to continue running the night. Being a locally oriented
professional DJ keeps one tethered to the circuits of the city, and after seven years of DJing
in Montreal and Quebec, Drouin wanted to spend more time traveling and working in the
studio as a producer and spend less time booking other DJs for a club night.
By 2007, as Overdose became less and less economically profitable, the infrastructural
support needed to run the weekly party night was slowly taken away by the people who
owned Parking. Additionally, around this time club owners in Montreal and elsewhere
became increasingly weary of investing in street level promotions teams as these networks
progressively moved to online social media sites such as Facebook. Mini’s initial business
plan for the night, which included funding for a promotions team and materials, was no
longer maintained as it was most likely a tenuous agreement from the beginning. From
2002–2007, a significant amount of the promotional budget was allotted for designing and
printing flyers that would be distributed hand-to-hand by a street team of promoters to
other nightclubs, scene actors, schools and retail stores. This form of street level promotional
activity was necessary in order to keep any night going, Overdose or otherwise. However,
when the budget was cut, the proprietors of Parking expected Drouin and her team to
carry out the same labour commitments of the previous five years, including spending five
nights per week handing out flyers to nightclub patrons. Once the budget was defunded
by Parking it also became much more difficult for Mini to foster relationships with both
local and international DJs who might potentially spin at the Thursday night. This meant
that Overdose would slowly lose its position in Montreal as a meeting point of local and
international EDM culture, and by 2009, the weekly ended.
Conclusion
For professional DJs working in local or international circuits of electronic dance music,
the entrepreneurial aspects of sustaining a career, such as running a label or creating and
sustaining a weekly party night, rarely mix well with the more creative aspects of the practice,
such as performing and studio production. Maintaining the weekly Overdose night for over
seven years and booking all of the DJs and performers, in addition to hiring a promotional
team, amongst other duties, requires that “70 percent of your life becomes dedicated to
that”, as DJ Mini puts it. Luckily for Drouin, and unlike the experiences of many other
women DJs working throughout the Western world (see Rodgers 2010), she was able to
continually meet and interact with queer networks of other DJs, producers and mentors
who were willing to share their knowledge of the craft and their musical equipment in
times when she needed some form of support. At the beginning of her career in music,
Drouin was helped by the aforementioned amateur DJ and manager of Bluedog. Likewise, a
professional DJ assisted her in developing more advanced DJ techniques, while introducing
her to DJ possibilities in Montreal’s Gay Village and hiring her in the record store that he
owned. As she incorporated more studio-based production as part of her practice in the
early-to-mid-2000s, Drouin received private sound design lessons for three years from her
Madden | DJ Mini and Montreal’s Vulgar Dance Music 41
manager’s friend, leading up to the release of her first album, Audio Hygiene (2006). As
Drouin emphasizes: “after three years, we finally had an album ready. The album was a trial-
and-error process, with a lot of different genres coming in and out at the same time, because
I had the time to experiment”.
In the years since Overdose, Mini has made numerous pragmatic decisions in order to
continue her professional musical practice as a DJ and producer as she no longer has an
ongoing weekly site to rely on. This is not uncommon for DJs and other musical practitioners
hoping to establish life-long professional careers in music and creative production. For
Drouin, these decisions entail reconsidering the musical genres she incorporates when
spinning, the styles of music she produces in the studio, who she collaborates with and the
range of gigs she agrees to accept. Since 2009, Mini has expanded her musicing to include
more corporate events (e.g., retail store openings, fashion shows and corporate sponsored
parties), sound, visual and interface design. She now uses DJ Mini as a brand identity,
rather than solely as a DJ moniker, to encompass all of the skills—artistic, educational and
entrepreneurial—that she has developed in her nearly twenty-year career. In 2012, Drouin
independently released a second full-length album of original tracks entitled Espace Temps,
while broadening her mentoring to include educational and musical workshops for kids in
Montreal.
Lastly, this article attempts to challenge some of the more dominant understandings
of electronic dance music through mapping some of the ways that Montreal operates as
a centre of electronic music production and consumption. North American (and Anglo)
understandings of dance music tend to follow a selective evolutionary path, with an ongoing
fascination with the United States’ three urban centres of dance music and their relationship
with certain parts of Western Europe, most notably London, Berlin and Paris: Chicago,
known as the “birthplace” of house music, in reference to the music played at the club
Warehouse in the city during the early 1980s; Detroit, known for its techno associations
and the Belleville Three ( Juan Atkins, Derrick May and Kevin Saunderson), whose techno
dance music sounds launched in the UK on the 1988 Virgin Records compilation, Techno:
The Dance Sound of Detroit (Thornton 1995: 74); and New York, where American disco
first emerged from David Mancuso’s Love Saves the Day party in 1970, the ensuing parties
at the Loft in the NoHo district of Manhattan (Lawrence 2003), and nightclubs like the
Sanctuary on West 43rd Street (Fickentscher 2000: 26). Because of this Anglo-American
centricity, important dance music centres such as Italy, Spain and Quebec, which very
likely produced as many disco records as Miami and New York, rarely receive attention
in histories of disco and electronic dance music. Interestingly, as Straw contends, disco’s
“roots in southern France and Italy are just as long as those in the United States, even if
the former are seen as less heroically subcultural” (2008: 125). This text argues that part of
this omission in the historical record is due to Montreal’s continued fascination with the
more vulgar aspects of electronic dance music, from the orchestral-infused disco of the late
1970s and early 1980s to the hypersexual rock stylizations of electroclash at the turn of the
millennium and beyond.
Dancecult 8(1)42
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Andra McCartney, Brian Fauteux and Jonathan Sterne for
insightful comments on earlier iterations of this article. Many thanks to Dancecult reviewers
for such generous feedback.
Notes
1 In addition, I attended nearly one party night per month between 2001–2006, Overdose being
the event I frequented the most, where I was able to develop numerous ongoing relationships
and conversations with party attendees, DJs, promoters and other scene actors.
2 Grenier, drawing directly from the work of Straw (1991), points out that although largely
Francophone oriented, Quebec emerged out of the international crisis as a “pluralistic musical
space” in the 1980s, “within which a range of musical practices coexist, interacting with
each other within a variety of processes of differentiation, and according to widely varying
trajectories of changes and cross-fertilization” (Straw, quoted in Grenier 1993: 222).
3 Line Grenier, email to author, 14 September 2012.
4 The Main refers to Montreal’s boulevard Saint-Laurent, which has historically operated as a
line dividing Montreal’s Anglophone population to the west and Francophone population to
the east. Martin Allor (1997) writes that over the course of the twentieth century, “the Main
has been a kind of liminal zone where the cultural geography of linguistic, ethnic and class
differences has intersected with the successive developments of leisure-cultural practices and
cultural industry equipment” (44).
5 Evelyne Drouin, interview with the author, 30 December 2011. All further citations are from
this interview.
References
Allor, Martin. 1997. “Locating Cultural Activity: The ‘Main’ as Chronotope and Heterotopia”.
Topia 1(1): 42–55.
Cohen, Sara. 1997. “Men Making a Scene: Rock Music and the Production of Gender”. In Sexing
the Groove: Popular Music and Gender, ed. Sheila Whiteley, 17–36. New York: Routledge.
Farrugia, Rebekah. 2012. Beyond the Dancefloor: Female DJs, Technology and Electronic Dance
Music Culture. Chicago: Intellect.
Fikentscher, Kai. 2000. “You Better Work!”: Underground Dance Music in New York City.
Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press.
Florida, Richard. 2011. “The Changing Geography of Pop Music”. The Atlantic. 17 February:
(accessed 26 February 2015).
http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2011/02/the-changing%09geography-of-pop-music/71341/
http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2011/02/the-changing%09geography-of-pop-music/71341/
Madden | DJ Mini and Montreal’s Vulgar Dance Music 43
Gavanas, Anna and Rosa Reitsamer. 2013. “DJ Technologies, Social Networks and Gendered
Trajectories in European DJ Cultures”. In DJ Culture in the Mix: Power, Technology, and
Social Change in Electronic Dance Music, eds. Bernardo Alexander Attias, Anna Gavanas and
Hillegonda C. Reitveld, 51–77. New York and London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Girard, Stéphane. 2011. “(Un)originality, Hypertextuality and Identity in Tiga’s ‘Sunglasses at
Night’”. Popular Music 30(1): 105–25. .
Grenier, Line. 1993. “The Aftermath of a Crisis: Quebec Music Industries in the
1980s”. Popular Music 12(3): 209–27. .
Katz, Mark. 2006. “Men, Women, and Turntables: Gender and the DJ Battle.” Musical Quarterly
89(4): 580–99. .
Kruse, Holly. 2003. Site and Sound: Understanding Independent Music Scenes. New York: Peter
Lang.
Lawrence, Tim. 2004. Love Saves the Day: A History of American Dance Music Culture, 1970–
1979. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
———. 2011. “Disco and the Queering of the Dance Floor”. Cultural Studies 25(2): 230–43.
.
LeBlanc, Larry. 2001. “Indies Thrive on Burgeoning Electronica in Canada as Genre Reaches the
Mainstream”. Billboard, 23 June: 78–9.
Luvaas, Brent. 2006. “Re-producing Pop: The Aesthetics of Ambivalence in Contemporary
Dance Music”. International Journal of Cultural Studies 9(2): 167–87. .
Maari, Frédéric. 2009. “De l’organisation au déroulement d’événements rave à Montréal: etude des
mécanismes de régulation sociale”. Master’s Thesis (Criminology), Université de Montréal.
Madden, David. 2012. “Cross-dressing to Backbeats: The Status of the Electroclash Producer and
the Politics of Electronic Music”. Dancecult: Journal of Electronic Dance Music Culture 4(2):
27 –47. .
Marsh, Charity. 2006. “‘Understand us before you end us’: Regulation,
Governmentality, and the Confessional Practices of Raving Bodies”. Popular Music 25(3):
415–30. .
Remiggi, Frank William. 1998. “Le Village gai de Montréal: entre le ghetto et l’espace identitaire”.
In Sortir de l’ombre: Histoires des communautés lesbienne et gaie de Montréal, eds. Irène
Demczuk and Frank William Remiggi, 269 –89. Montréal, QC: VLB Editeur.
Reitsamer, Rosa. 2011. “The DIY Careers of Techno and Drum ‘n’ Bass DJs in Vienna”.
Dancecult: Journal of Electronic Dance Music Culture 3(1): 28–43. .
Rodgers, Tara. 2010. Pink Noises: Women on Electronic Music and Sound. Durham, NC: Duke
University Press.
Straw, Will. 1991. “Systems of Articulation, Logics of Change: Scenes and
Communities in Popular Music”. Cultural Studies 5(3): 368–88. .
———. 1993. “The Floor, The Booth and the Wall: Dance Music and the Fear of Falling”. Public
8: 169–82.
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261143010000681
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261143000005687
https://doi.org/10.1093/musqtl/gdm007
https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2011.535989
https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877906064029
https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877906064029
https://doi.org/10.12801/1947-5403.2012.04.02.02
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261143006001000
https://doi.org/10.12801/1947-5403.2011.03.01.02
https://doi.org/10.12801/1947-5403.2011.03.01.02
https://doi.org/10.1080/09502389100490311
https://doi.org/10.1080/09502389100490311
Dancecult 8(1)44
———. 2004. “Cultural Scenes”. Society and Leisure 27(2): 411–22. .
———. 2005. “Pathways of Cultural Movement”. In Accounting For Culture: Thinking Through
Cultural Citizenship, eds. Caroline Andrew, Monica Gattinger, M. Sharon Jeannotte and Will
Straw, 183–97. Ottawa, ON: University of Ottawa Press.
———. 2008. “Music From the Wrong Place: On the Italianicity of Quebec Disco”. Criticism
50(1): 113–32. .
Straw, Will and Douglas Tallack, eds. 2009. Global Cities/Local Sites. Melbourne: Melbourne
University Publishing/Universitas 21, U21 e-book.
Stahl, Geoff. 2001. “Tracing out an Anglo-Bohemia: Musicmaking and the Myth of Montreal”.
Public 22(23): 99–121. .
Stolarick, Kevin and Richard Florida. 2006. “Creativity, Connections and Innovation: A Study
of Linkages in the Montréal Region”. Environment and Planning A. 38(10): 1799–817.
.
Taylor, Jodie. 2008. “The Queerest of the Queer: Sexuality, Politics and Music on the Brisbane
Scene”. Continuum 22(5): 647–61. .
———. 2009. “Spewing Out of the Closet: Musicology on Queer Punk”. In Musical Islands:
Exploring Connections Between Music, Place and Research, eds. Elizabeth Mackinlay, Brydie
Leigh Bartleet and Katelyn Barney, 221–41. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.
———. 2010. Playing it Queer: Popular Music, Identity and Queer World-making. Bern: Peter
Lang.
———. 2012. “Scenes and Sexualities: Queerly Reframing the Music Scenes Perspective”.
Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies 26(1): 143–56. .
Thornton, Sarah. 1995. Club Cultures: Music, Media and Subcultural Capital. Cambridge: Polity
Press.
Turenne, Martin. 2006. “Sliding Down the Surface Electro-clash: Your 15 Minutes Are Up”.
Exclaim!, 1 January: (accessed 25 February 2016).
Weheliye, Alexander G. 2002. “‘Feenin’: Posthuman Voices in Contemporary Black
Popular Music”. Social Text 20(2): 21–47. .
Whiteley, Sheila and Jennifer Rycenga, eds. 2006. Queering the Popular Pitch. New York:
Routledge.
Discography
Adult. 2000. “Nausea”. Nausea. Ersatz Audio (12-inch): EZ–014.
.
Alter Ego. 2004. “Rocker”. Rocker. Skint Records (12-inch): Skint 103.
.
Mini. 2006. Audio Hygiene. NRG Komrads (CD): NRGK 001.
.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07053436.2004.10707657
https://doi.org/10.1080/07053436.2004.10707657
https://doi.org/10.1353/crt.0.0054
https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839407967-010
https://doi.org/10.1068/a3874
https://doi.org/10.1080/10304310802311626
https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2011.538471
https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2011.538471
http://exclaim.ca/Features/PointOfView/sliding_down_surface-electro clash_your_15_minutes_are
http://exclaim.ca/Features/PointOfView/sliding_down_surface-electro clash_your_15_minutes_are
https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-20-2_71-21
http://www.discogs.com/ADULT-Nausea/release/12616
http://www.discogs.com/Alter-Ego-Rocker/release/338153
http://www.discogs.com/Mini-AudioHygiene/release/827660
Madden | DJ Mini and Montreal’s Vulgar Dance Music 45
Miss Kittin and the Hacker. “Frank Sinatra”. First Album. International Deejay Gigolo Records
(CD Album): Gigolo 75.
.
Peaches. 2000. “Fuck the Pain Away”. The Teaches of Peaches. Kitty-Yo (CD Album):
KY00033CD.
.
Tiga. 2000. Mixed Emotions (Montreal Mix Sessions Vol. 5). Turbo (CD): MARCD-013.
.
Tiga and Zyntherius. 2001. “Sunglasses at Night”. Sunglasses EP. International Deejay
GigoloRecords (12-inch): Gigolo 80.
.
http://www.discogs.com/Miss-Kittin- e-HackerFirst-Album/ release/20345
http://www.discogs.com/Peaches- e-Teaches-Of-Peaches/release/50236
http://www.discogs.com/Tiga-Mixed-Emotions-Montreal-Mix-Sessions-Vol-5/release/1052
http://www.discogs.com/Tiga-Mixed-Emotions-Montreal-Mix-Sessions-Vol-5/release/1052
http://www.discogs.com/Tiga-Zyntherius%09Sunglasses-EP/release/18500