
































Microsoft Word - 94-104_253


ISSN 2744-1741 
Defense and Security Studies  Review Article 
Vol. 4, 2023, pp.94-104 
https://doi.org/10.37868/dss.v4.id253 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) that allows others 
to share and adapt the material for any purpose (even commercially), in any medium with an acknowledgement of the work's 
authorship and initial publication in this journal. 

 94 

 
 
Hezbollah and Russian intelligence collaboration: a complex nexus  
 
Anastasios-Nikolaos Kanellopoulos 1*, 
1 Department of Business Administration, Athens University of Economics and Business, Greece 
 
 

*Corresponding author E-mail:   ankanell@aueb.gr   

Received: Oct. 20, 2023 
Revised: Nov. 8, 2023 
Accepted: Nov. 9, 2023 
Online: Nov. 13, 2023 

Abstract 
This paper delves into the intricate relationship between Hezbollah, the Shiite 
militant organization based in Lebanon, and Russian Intelligence Agencies (RIA). 
The collaboration between Hezbollah and RIA represents a complex interplay of 
geopolitical interests, regional dynamics, and strategic objectives. The paper 
examines the historical context of their relationship, the motivations behind their 
cooperation, the nature of their interactions, and the implications for regional and 
global security. Drawing upon a multidisciplinary approach that combines 
insights from Political Science, International Relations, Intelligence studies, and 
Middle Eastern studies, provides a comprehensive analysis of this collaboration. 
It also explores the broader implications for the Middle East, Russia's role in the 
region, and the challenges it poses to international efforts to counter terrorism and 
promote stability. 

© The Author 2023. 
Published by ARDA. 

Keywords: Hezbollah, Russian Intelligence, Iran, Israel, South America, Africa 

1. Introduction  

The collaboration between Hezbollah, the Shiite militant organization based in Lebanon, and RIA has 
emerged as a complex and intriguing aspect of the geopolitical landscape in the Middle East. Hezbollah, 
founded in the early 1980s, has evolved into a powerful regional actor with a dual identity as a political party 
and a militant group. Its historical ties to Iran and Syria have significantly shaped its regional presence and 
influence [1]. 

RIA, notably the Federal Security Service (FSB) and the Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU), have expanded 
their activities in the Middle East, positioning Russia as a key player in regional affairs. The collaboration 
between Hezbollah and RIA reflects a convergence of interests, primarily centered on counterterrorism efforts 
and regional stability. 

This paper seeks to provide a comprehensive analysis of the Hezbollah-Russia collaboration. It explores the 
historical context of their relationship, the motivations driving their cooperation, the nature of their 
interactions, and the implications for regional and global security. It also considers the broader implications 
for the Middle East, Russia's role in the region, and the challenges it poses to international efforts to counter 
terrorism and promote stability. 

2. Research method 

The present study is a Review article, that serves as an in-depth exploration of the existing body of literature 
concerning Hezbollah, RIA, and their collaborative interactions. It underscores the paramount importance of 



 DSS Vol. 4, 2023, pp.94-104 

95 

synthesizing a wide spectrum of source materials, encompassing academic studies, government reports, policy 
documents, and media sources, to facilitate a holistic comprehension of this intricate subject matter. By 
incorporating academic studies, this review establishes a scholarly foundation for comprehending the 
historical evolution, ideological underpinnings, and operational intricacies of both Hezbollah and RIA. The 
inclusion of government reports and policy documents contributes a policy-oriented perspective, offering 
insights into the strategic implications and security ramifications of their associations, while also illuminating 
the responses of relevant state actors. 

2.1    Hezbollah: the Shiite militant organization 

Hezbollah, whose name translates to "Party of God" in Arabic, is a Shiite Islamist organization with its roots 
firmly embedded in the tumultuous history of Lebanon and the wider Middle East. Its journey from a 
fledgling revolutionary militant group to a dominant political force within Lebanon is a tale marked by 
conflict, resilience, adaptation, and complex regional dynamics. 

2.1.1 Foundations amid civil strife: 1982-1990 

Hezbollah's origins can be traced back to the early 1980s when Lebanon was embroiled in a protracted civil 
war and under Israeli occupation. This period of intense turmoil provided fertile ground for the emergence of 
Shiite resistance movements, including Hezbollah. Inspired by the Iranian Revolution of 1979 and supported 
by Iran's revolutionary ideology, the group was founded in the aftermath of Israel's invasion of Lebanon in 
1982 [2]. 

Initially, Hezbollah's primary objective was to resist the Israeli occupation and contribute to the expulsion of 
foreign forces from Lebanese territory. Drawing from a wellspring of religious fervor, the organization 
engaged in acts of violence against Israeli military targets, garnering both popular support among Lebanon's 
Shiite community and condemnation from international actors. The 1983 bombings of the U.S. Embassy and 
Marine barracks in Beirut, which resulted in significant casualties, highlighted Hezbollah's militant tactics and 
its readiness to employ suicide bombings. 

2.1.2 Transition to political power: 1990s 

The early 1990s marked an important, pivotal period in Hezbollah's evolution as Lebanon attempted to 
emerge from the ashes of civil conflict. The Taif Agreement of 1989, which ended the civil war, paved the 
way for political reforms and power-sharing arrangements. Hezbollah, sensing the changing political 
landscape, embarked on a strategic shift towards becoming a recognized political entity while maintaining its 
military capabilities [3]. 

In 1992, Hezbollah participated in Lebanon's parliamentary elections for the first time, securing a notable 
presence within the Lebanese political system. Simultaneously, it continued its resistance efforts against 
Israeli forces in South Lebanon, earning admiration as a defender of Lebanese sovereignty, especially among 
the Shiite population [4]. 

2.1.3 Resistance and regional dimensions: 2000s 

The year 2000 marked a significant victory for Hezbollah when it successfully pressured Israel to withdraw its 
troops from South Lebanon, claiming it as a victory for the "resistance." This achievement bolstered the 
group's reputation as a formidable force and established it as a key player in Lebanese politics [2]. 

Hezbollah's regional influence also expanded during this period, particularly through its alliance with Iran and 
Syria. Its involvement in regional conflicts, including the support for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's 
regime in the Syrian Civil War, positioned it as a critical actor in the broader Middle East. Additionally, the 
group's military capabilities continued to grow, backed by Iranian support and bolstered by its experience in 
asymmetric warfare [4]. 

2.1.4 2006 War with Israel: consolidation of power 



 DSS Vol. 4, 2023, pp.94-104 

96 

One of the defining moments in Hezbollah's history occurred in 2006 when a conflict erupted between the 
group and Israel. Sparked by the abduction of Israeli soldiers by Hezbollah, the war resulted in widespread 
destruction in Lebanon and significant casualties on both sides. Despite the devastation, Hezbollah claimed a 
propaganda victory, depicting its resilience and ability to withstand a powerful adversary [2]. This conflict 
solidified Hezbollah's status as a formidable military force and further entrenched its role in Lebanese politics. 
Domestically, it capitalized on the war's aftermath, participating in Lebanese governments and parliamentary 
elections. The group's "two-track" strategy, maintaining its military capabilities while engaging in political 
processes, proved effective in securing both popular support and political influence [5]. 

2.1.5 2010s and beyond: regional influence and challenges 

In the 2010s, Hezbollah continued to navigate the intricate web of regional politics, particularly in the context 
of the Syrian Civil War. Its military intervention in Syria in support of the Assad regime exposed it to 
criticism, both regionally and internationally, while also reinforcing its alliance with Iran [6]. At the same 
time, Hezbollah's social services and charity networks played a crucial role in providing for Lebanon's Shiite 
population, contributing to its popularity and influence within its community. However, this dual identity as a 
militant group and a provider of social services posed complex challenges and dilemmas for the organization. 

In recent years, Lebanon has experienced a series of political and economic crises, with widespread protests 
against political corruption and mismanagement. Hezbollah, as a significant political force in the country, has 
faced mounting pressure to address these issues and address the demands of the Lebanese people. 

2.1.6 Hezbollah's ideological foundations 

Hezbollah's ideological foundations are deeply rooted in Twelver Shiite Islam, a branch of Islam that holds 
the belief in twelve divinely appointed Imams after the Prophet Muhammad [2]. The organization's ideology 
is characterized by several key principles: 

 Wilayat al-Faqih: At the core of Hezbollah's ideology is the concept of "Wilayat al-Faqih," which 
translates to "Guardianship of the Jurist." This doctrine, propagated by Iran's Ayatollah Ruhollah 
Khomeini, asserts that an Islamic jurist (faqih) holds ultimate authority over the state, acting as the 
spiritual and political guide. Hezbollah's adherence to this doctrine aligns it closely with Iran's 
theocratic system. 

 Resistance: Central to Hezbollah's ideology is the principle of resistance, both against foreign 
occupation and perceived oppressors. This principle is rooted in the historical experience of Shiite 
communities in Lebanon, who faced marginalization and persecution. 

 Anti-Israel stance: Hezbollah's staunch anti-Israel stance is a cornerstone of its ideology. It views the 
Israeli state as an illegitimate occupier of Palestinian and Lebanese lands, and its armed struggle 
against Israel is justified on religious and nationalistic grounds. 

 Social justice: While primarily known for its military activities, Hezbollah also emphasizes social 
justice and the provision of social services to its constituents, particularly within Lebanon's Shiite 
community. This combination of military and social roles sets Hezbollah apart as both a militant 
group and a political party. 

2.1.7 Hezbollah's strategic objectives 

Hezbollah's objectives have evolved over time, reflecting its dynamic role in Lebanese and regional politics 
[2]. Its primary objectives can be summarized as follows: 

 Resistance against Israel: Hezbollah's foremost objective is the liberation of Lebanese territory, 
specifically the Shebaa Farms and Kfar Shuba Hills, which it considers occupied by Israel. Its military 



 DSS Vol. 4, 2023, pp.94-104 

97 

wing, the Islamic Resistance, is dedicated to this cause, and it has engaged in multiple conflicts with 
Israel, including the 2006 war [4]. 

 Political influence: Hezbollah aims to maintain and expand its political influence within Lebanon. It 
participates in the Lebanese government and parliament, where it holds significant power and 
represents the Shiite community. 

 Regional engagement: Hezbollah's regional engagement extends to support for allies such as Syria's 
Assad regime and close cooperation with Iran. Its regional objectives include countering Sunni 
extremism and enhancing Shiite influence [7]. 

 Social services: Hezbollah provides an array of social services, including healthcare, education, and 
financial assistance, primarily to Lebanon's Shiite population. These services contribute to its 
popularity and maintain a social welfare infrastructure. 

2.1.8 Hezbollah's organizational structure 

Hezbollah's organizational structure is a meticulously designed system that reflects its dual identity as a 
militant organization and a political party within Lebanon. This intricate structure enables Hezbollah to exert 
influence across multiple domains, both domestically and regionally. At its helm is the Secretary-General, 
currently Hassan Nasrallah, who wields significant authority and serves as the organization's primary 
spokesperson. Beneath this top leadership tier is the Shura Council, a high-level decision-making body 
responsible for strategic planning and oversight [8]. 

Hezbollah's Executive Council manages its daily operations and oversees specialized committees, each 
dedicated to distinct functions such as military operations, political engagement, and social services. The 
military wing, known as the Islamic Resistance, is central to Hezbollah's identity and serves as its armed 
force. Highly trained and well-armed, the Islamic Resistance is responsible for conducting cross-border 
attacks against Israel and safeguarding the organization's military capabilities. 

The political wing of Hezbollah operates within Lebanon's formal political institutions, with elected 
representatives in parliament and cabinet members in the government. This political presence grants 
Hezbollah significant influence in Lebanese politics, particularly within the Shiite community, and allows it to 
shape policies and decisions [9]. Hezbollah's social services sector is equally vital; it operates an extensive 
network of hospitals, schools, and charities that provide essential support to Lebanon's Shiite population. This 
multifaceted approach, combining military might with social welfare initiatives, enhances Hezbollah's support 
base and bolsters its legitimacy [10]. 

Hezbollah also maintains a sophisticated media and propaganda apparatus that disseminates its messages and 
activities through various channels, including television, radio, and social media. This media wing plays a 
crucial role in shaping public perception and maintaining cohesion among its supporters. Overall, Hezbollah's 
organizational structure is characterized by hierarchical leadership, tight internal cohesion, and a well-
balanced integration of political, military, and social elements. This dynamic structure enables Hezbollah to 
exert influence on both domestic and regional fronts, contributing to its enduring prominence in the complex 
geopolitics of the Middle East. Understanding this intricate organizational design is essential for 
comprehending the organization's multifaceted role and its impact on Lebanon's political landscape and 
regional dynamics [11]. 

2.2   Russian Intelligence: A strategic apparatus 

2.2.1 Overview of Russian intelligence agencies 

The Russian Federation boasts a formidable and complex array of intelligence agencies that play pivotal roles 
in shaping domestic and international affairs. These agencies are renowned for their operational prowess and 



 DSS Vol. 4, 2023, pp.94-104 

98 

the extent of their reach, reflecting Russia's longstanding commitment to intelligence gathering, espionage, 
and covert operations. While several intelligence agencies operate within Russia, some of the most prominent 
ones include the Federal Security Service (FSB), the Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU), and the Foreign 
Intelligence Service (SVR). 

Federal Security Service (FSB): The FSB is Russia's primary domestic intelligence agency, responsible for a 
wide range of security functions within the country. Its mandate includes counterterrorism, 
counterintelligence, cyber defense, border security, and monitoring political dissent. The FSB's influence 
extends to domestic surveillance and intelligence gathering, making it a powerful entity in domestic politics 
and national security. It is worth noting that the FSB's roots can be traced back to the KGB, the Soviet-era 
intelligence agency, which was disbanded after the collapse of the Soviet Union [12]. 

Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU): The GRU is Russia's military intelligence agency and is renowned for 
its clandestine operations, espionage, and special forces capabilities. Unlike the FSB and the SVR, which 
focus on domestic and foreign intelligence respectively, the GRU primarily serves the Russian Armed Forces 
[13]. Its missions encompass gathering military intelligence, conducting covert operations, and supporting 
Russian military activities worldwide. The GRU has earned notoriety for its alleged involvement in 
cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and efforts to undermine foreign governments, making it a focal 
point of international scrutiny [14]. 

Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR): The SVR is Russia's primary foreign intelligence agency and specializes 
in collecting intelligence from abroad. Its primary mission is to gather information on foreign governments, 
organizations, and individuals, as well as to engage in covert operations to further Russian interests 
internationally. The SVR plays a crucial role in Russia's foreign policy, providing decision-makers with 
critical intelligence assessments and supporting diplomatic efforts. While its operations are generally more 
discreet compared to the GRU, the SVR has faced allegations of interference in foreign elections and 
espionage activities on multiple occasions. 

These intelligence agencies are part of a broader Intelligence community in Russia, which also includes 
specialized agencies such as the Federal Protective Service (FSO) responsible for protecting high-ranking 
officials, and the Federal Drug Control Service (FSKN) involved in combating drug trafficking. Additionally, 
Russia's Intelligence agencies often work in coordination with each other and have well-established ties to the 
Kremlin, allowing for effective information-sharing and policy alignment [15]. 

The RIA community's capabilities and activities have drawn significant international attention and concern, 
particularly in the context of allegations of election interference, cyberattacks, and espionage operations. 
Understanding the roles and functions of these intelligence agencies is crucial for comprehending Russia's 
approach to national security and its broader geopolitical strategies on the global stage. 

2.2.2 Russian intelligence regional presence, collaborations, and strategy 

RIA, renowned for its clandestine prowess and historical significance, maintains a robust regional presence 
and engages in strategic collaborations across the globe. These agencies, deploy their expertise to protect 
Russia's national interests, project power, and influence geopolitical outcomes. Their regional focus extends 
from neighboring states to far-flung regions, encompassing Europe, the Middle East, Asia, and beyond. Their 
strategic collaborations are designed to counter adversaries and bolster Moscow's standing in an increasingly 
complex and competitive world [16]. 

In the European theater, RIA has a long-standing history of involvement in espionage activities. The SVR, 
responsible for foreign intelligence, maintains an extensive network of agents and assets across Europe. It 
closely monitors the activities of NATO, the European Union, and individual member states, seeking to gain 
insights into their decision-making processes and policy directions. This information is vital for Russia's 
strategic planning and diplomatic maneuvering. Additionally, the GRU, with its specialization in military 



 DSS Vol. 4, 2023, pp.94-104 

99 

intelligence, has a strong presence in Europe, particularly concerning the Baltic states, Ukraine, and the 
Balkans. The GRU plays a crucial role in supporting pro-Russian separatist movements and conducting cyber 
operations, as demonstrated in Ukraine. 

Moving eastward, RIA have intensified their efforts in the Middle East and North Africa. This region holds 
immense significance due to its vast energy reserves and its role as a battleground for regional and global 
powers. The SVR and the FSB, in coordination with the Russian Ministry of Defense, have established close 
ties with the Syrian government, providing military support and intelligence assistance to President Bashar al-
Assad's regime. This has allowed Russia to maintain a strategic foothold in the Middle East and expand its 
influence across the region. Furthermore, RIA collaborate with Iran and support proxy groups in Yemen, 
enhancing their ability to shape events in this volatile region. 

In Asia, Russia's intelligence agencies focus on strengthening ties with countries that share its vision of a 
multipolar world order. The Russian government, led by President Vladimir Putin, seeks to counterbalance 
Western influence in the region by collaborating with China, India, and Central Asian states. The SVR and the 
FSB work closely with their counterparts in these countries to exchange intelligence, counter terrorism, and 
combat cyber threats. This strategic collaboration not only advances Russian interests but also challenges the 
dominance of Western intelligence agencies in the region. 

Beyond regional presence and collaborations, RIA employ a multifaceted strategy that combines traditional 
espionage, cyber operations, and disinformation campaigns to achieve their objectives. One notable example 
is Russia's interference in the 2016 United States presidential election, which brought the extent of its 
capabilities into the global spotlight. The GRU's cyber unit, known as APT28 or Fancy Bear, allegedly hacked 
the Democratic National Committee's emails, revealing sensitive information that influenced the election 
narrative. This operation showcased Russia's proficiency in hybrid warfare, blending cyberattacks with 
information warfare to disrupt and shape political landscapes. 

In addition to cyber operations, disinformation campaigns orchestrated by RIA have become a potent tool in 
influencing public opinion and destabilizing adversaries. The Internet Research Agency (IRA), a Kremlin-
linked troll farm, is notorious for its efforts to spread disinformation and sow discord on social media 
platforms during the 2016 U.S. election and other events worldwide. Such activities not only create confusion 
but also exploit existing fault lines within target societies, amplifying divisions and weakening the social 
fabric of rival nations. 

Furthermore, RIA employ a tactic known as "active measures" to manipulate foreign governments and 
organizations covertly. These measures involve the use of espionage, covert influence, and propaganda to 
advance Russia's interests while obscuring its involvement. For example, the SVR's "illegals" program, 
exposed in 2010, revealed a network of deep-cover spies living under false identities in the United States and 
other Western countries. These operatives conducted espionage activities and gathered sensitive information, 
all while maintaining the facade of ordinary citizens [12]. 

2.3   The historical context of Hezbollah and Russian intelligence collaboration 

The collaboration between Hezbollah, the Lebanon-based Shiite militant group, and RIA is a complex and 
multifaceted relationship that has evolved over several decades. To understand this collaboration, it is crucial 
to delve into the historical context that has shaped their interactions. 

Hezbollah's origins trace back to the chaotic and turbulent landscape of Lebanon in the 1980s. This period was 
marked by a protracted civil war, Israeli occupation of southern Lebanon, and the presence of various 
sectarian militias vying for control. In this milieu, Hezbollah emerged as a Shiite resistance movement with 
strong ideological ties to Iran's theocratic regime. Iran, eager to establish a Shiite bulwark against Israel and 
promote its revolutionary ideals, became a key patron of Hezbollah, providing it with financial, military, and 
ideological support [17]. 



 DSS Vol. 4, 2023, pp.94-104 

100 

At the same time, the Soviet Union was in the midst of its twilight years, with the Cold War era winding 
down. The dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 saw the emergence of the Russian Federation under the 
leadership of Boris Yeltsin. During this period, RIA, including the Federal Security Service (FSB) and the 
Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff of the Armed Forces (GRU), underwent significant 
transformations. They sought to adapt to a new global order characterized by multipolarity and an evolving 
security landscape. 

The historical context of the collaboration between Hezbollah and RIA begins to take shape in the late 1990s 
and early 2000s. This period witnessed a series of events that laid the foundation for their interaction. First, 
Hezbollah consolidated its position in Lebanon, transforming from a guerrilla group into a political and 
military force with significant influence in Lebanese politics. Second, Russia, under Vladimir Putin's 
leadership, embarked on a more assertive foreign policy agenda, seeking to regain its status as a major global 
player. As part of this strategy, Russia aimed to strengthen its presence in the Middle East, a region where it 
had historical ties dating back to the Soviet era [18]. 

One critical turning point in the Hezbollah-Russia relationship was Russia's involvement in the Syrian 
conflict, which began in 2015. Hezbollah had long maintained close ties with the Syrian regime of Bashar al-
Assad, viewing it as a crucial ally in the region. When Russia intervened militarily to support Assad, it created 
a common strategic interest between Moscow and Hezbollah: the preservation of the Syrian regime and the 
containment of Islamist extremist groups, including ISIS. This shared goal became the catalyst for deeper 
collaboration [19]. 

RIA, notably the GRU, found themselves working alongside Hezbollah in Syria. While their immediate 
objectives aligned in Syria, the collaboration also extended to intelligence-sharing and coordination. 
Hezbollah's expertise in the region, including its knowledge of local actors and terrain, complemented Russia's 
military operations. RIA benefited from Hezbollah's human intelligence assets and local networks, which 
provided valuable insights into the evolving dynamics of the Syrian conflict. 

Another dimension of their collaboration emerged in the realm of counterterrorism. Both Hezbollah and 
Russia faced threats from Islamist extremist groups operating in Syria and the broader Middle East. Hezbollah 
had extensive experience in combating groups like Al-Qaeda and its affiliates. RIA sought to harness this 
expertise in their efforts to neutralize terrorist threats, both regionally and globally. Their cooperation included 
sharing information on extremist networks, intelligence analysis, and joint operations [20]. 

Furthermore, the collaboration between Hezbollah and RIA took on a covert dimension, particularly in the 
realm of arms transfers and logistics. Reports suggest that Hezbollah may have received weapons and support 
from Russian sources, facilitated through clandestine channels. While the exact extent and nature of this 
covert collaboration remain shrouded in secrecy, it underscores the multifaceted nature of their relationship. 

3. Results and discussion 

3.1.   The potential of collaboration in South America 

The potential collaboration between Hezbollah and RIA in South America is a matter of concern and 
speculation within the international intelligence community. While there is no concrete evidence to suggest a 
direct and formal alliance between these two entities in the region, it is essential to analyze the factors that 
could influence such collaboration, as well as the potential implications for South America's security and 
geopolitical landscape [3]. 

First and foremost, it is crucial to understand the motives that might drive Hezbollah and RIA to explore 
cooperation in South America. Hezbollah, known for its global reach and willingness to form alliances with 
sympathetic actors, has a history of establishing networks beyond the Middle East. South America has a 
significant Shiite Lebanese diaspora, which offers Hezbollah a potential source of financial support and 



 DSS Vol. 4, 2023, pp.94-104 

101 

recruits. Moreover, the region's porous borders and weak governance structures could provide fertile ground 
for Hezbollah's fundraising and logistical activities, particularly in the illicit drug trade. Russia, on the other 
hand, has been seeking to expand its influence in various regions, including South America, as part of its 
efforts to counterbalance Western dominance. Collaborating with Hezbollah could allow Russia to gain 
leverage in a region traditionally considered within the sphere of influence of the United States [21]. 

One area where collaboration between Hezbollah and RIA could manifest is in the realm of cyber warfare. 
Both entities have demonstrated their capabilities in the cyber domain. Hezbollah, with support from its 
Iranian sponsors, has engaged in cyber activities, including hacking and disinformation campaigns. RIA, such 
as the GRU, have been accused of orchestrating cyberattacks in various parts of the world. In South America, 
these two entities could share expertise and resources, potentially targeting critical infrastructure, government 
institutions, or financial systems. Such cyber collaboration could have significant destabilizing effects and 
pose a threat to regional cybersecurity. 

Another aspect to consider is the potential convergence of interests in the illicit economy. South America has 
long been a hub for drug trafficking, with various criminal organizations operating in the region. Hezbollah 
has been accused of involvement in the drug trade to finance its activities, and Russia has a history of 
exploiting illicit networks to advance its interests. Collaboration in this arena could involve intelligence 
sharing, money laundering, or even joint operations to protect drug routes and maximize profits. Such 
collaboration could undermine the rule of law and fuel criminal enterprises, further destabilizing the region 
[22]. 

Additionally, the political landscape in South America presents opportunities for Hezbollah and RIA to 
collaborate. Some countries in the region have experienced political instability and anti-Western sentiments, 
creating an environment in which these actors may find common cause. Russia has sought to build alliances 
with governments that are critical of the United States, and Hezbollah has used political influence to gain 
support among Shiite communities and sympathetic political factions. The convergence of their interests could 
lead to cooperation in influencing domestic politics, shaping policy decisions, or even supporting like-minded 
political movements [17]. 

3.2   The potential of collaboration in Africa 

The potential collaboration between Hezbollah, the Lebanese Shiite militant group, and RIA in Africa is a 
topic that raises concerns and speculation among experts and policymakers. While there is no concrete 
evidence to confirm a direct and formal alliance between these two entities on the African continent, it is 
essential to explore the factors that could influence such collaboration and consider the potential implications 
for Africa's security, geopolitics, and regional stability [3]. 

One of the factors that could drive Hezbollah and RIA to explore collaboration in Africa is the region's 
increasing strategic importance. Africa's vast resources, including minerals, energy reserves, and agricultural 
lands, have attracted the interest of global powers seeking to secure their access to these valuable assets. 
Russia, under President Vladimir Putin's leadership, has been eager to expand its influence in Africa as part of 
its broader strategy to counterbalance Western dominance. Hezbollah, with its global reach and connections, 
may see opportunities to align with Russian interests on the continent [23]. 

Additionally, both Hezbollah and RIA have demonstrated their capabilities in the realms of unconventional 
warfare and asymmetric tactics. Hezbollah, with support from Iran, has honed its skills in guerrilla warfare, 
terrorism, and proxy conflicts in the Middle East. Russia, through its intelligence agencies like the GRU, has 
engaged in hybrid warfare tactics, including disinformation campaigns, cyberattacks, and support for 
paramilitary groups. These shared expertise areas could provide a basis for collaboration, as both entities seek 
to leverage their skills in a region characterized by conflicts, instability, and weak governance. 



 DSS Vol. 4, 2023, pp.94-104 

102 

One area where collaboration might manifest is in the field of intelligence sharing and analysis. RIA, with 
their extensive global reach, could provide Hezbollah with valuable information on African governments, 
regional dynamics, and emerging security threats. This intelligence could assist Hezbollah in identifying 
potential partners, allies, or opportunities for expanding its influence on the continent. In return, Hezbollah's 
networks and expertise could support RIA efforts to gather information, track extremist groups, and protect its 
interests in Africa [24]. 

The evolving security landscape in Africa also presents potential opportunities for collaboration. The 
continent faces a range of security challenges, including terrorism, organized crime, and insurgency 
movements. Hezbollah has experience in asymmetric warfare and has been accused of providing training and 
support to various militant groups in the Middle East. RIA, likewise, have engaged in counterterrorism 
operations and have supported governments in conflict zones. Their collaboration could involve coordinating 
efforts to combat common threats, such as Islamist extremist groups operating in Africa, thereby enhancing 
regional security. 

Moreover, Africa's political terrain, marked by diverse governments, shifting alliances, and fragile states, 
offers opportunities for Hezbollah and RIA to exert influence. Both entities have a history of manipulating 
political processes and supporting like-minded factions. Hezbollah has sought to gain political influence in 
Lebanon and beyond, while Russia has pursued strategic partnerships with governments that align with its 
interests. In Africa, their collaboration might involve supporting sympathetic political actors or influencing 
political outcomes to advance their shared goals. 

4. Conclusions 

In conclusion, the examination of the potential collaboration between Hezbollah and RIA reveals a complex 
and multifaceted nexus that exists within a rapidly changing global landscape. While there is no definitive 
evidence to confirm a direct and formal alliance between these two entities, various factors suggest that their 
interests may converge in regions of strategic importance, such as the Middle East, South America, and 
Africa. Hezbollah's global reach, expertise in asymmetric warfare, and connections to Iran provide it with a 
unique set of capabilities and interests, while Russia, under President Vladimir Putin's leadership, seeks to 
expand its influence and counterbalance Western dominance on the international stage. 

The potential areas of collaboration span from intelligence-sharing and analysis to cyber warfare, asymmetric 
tactics, and influence operations. Both entities have demonstrated their capabilities in these domains and may 
find opportunities to align their interests in regions where conflicts, instability, and weak governance prevail. 
However, numerous obstacles and risks, including the presence of Western intelligence agencies, local 
dynamics, and potential backlash, could deter or limit the extent of their collaboration. 

The implications of such collaboration, if it were to materialize, would extend beyond the regions of interest 
to impact global security, stability, and the balance of power. It would raise concerns about the potential 
exacerbation of conflicts, destabilization of regions, and threats to cybersecurity. As such, international 
stakeholders, including governments, regional organizations, and intelligence agencies, must remain vigilant 
and proactive in monitoring, analyzing, and countering any activities that may pose a threat to peace and 
security. 

In an era marked by increasing uncertainty, shifting alliances, and emerging security challenges, 
understanding and addressing the potential collaboration between non-state actors like Hezbollah and state 
actors like Russia is essential. This complex nexus underscores the evolving nature of international relations, 
where traditional and non-traditional actors alike seek to advance their interests in an interconnected and 
rapidly changing world. It is incumbent upon the global community to adapt and respond effectively to these 
dynamics, prioritizing diplomacy, conflict prevention, and the protection of international norms and values to 
maintain global stability and security. 



 DSS Vol. 4, 2023, pp.94-104 

103 

Declaration of competing interest  

The author declares that   has no known financial or non-financial competing interests in any material 
discussed in this paper. 

Funding information  

No funding was received from any financial organization to conduct this research. 

References 

[1]  M. Levitt, “1. The Party of God Is Born,” in Hezbollah the global footprint of Lebanon’s party of god, 
Washington: Georgetown University Press, 2015. 

[2]  D. Avon, A.T. Khatchadourian, and J. M. Todd, “Part I: The ‘Party of God’: An Itinerary (1982– 2009),” 
in Hezbollah: A history of the “party of god,” Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012. 

[3]  M. Levitt, Hezbollah the global footprint of Lebanon’s party of god, Washington: Georgetown 
University Press, 2015. 

[4]  S. Haddad, “A survey of Lebanese Shi’i attitudes towards Hezbollah,” in Small Wars & Insurgencies, 
vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 317–333, 2005. doi:10.1080/09592310500221286. 

[5] “Lebanon’s army faces rising pressure over Hezbollah,” Emerald Expert Briefings, 2018. 
doi:10.1108/oxan-db236768. 

[6]  Z. Kızılkaya, “Morality of Hezbollah’s conflicts with Israel,” in Critical Studies on Terrorism, vol. 12, 
no. 3, pp. 371–394, 2019. doi:10.1080/17539153.2019.1573037. 

[7] O. Seliktar and F. Rezaei, Iran, Revolution, and Proxy Wars.  Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG 
2020, pp. 21–56, 2019. 2021. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-29418-2_2. 

[8]  M. Koss, “The Lebanese Hezbollah,” Resistance, Power, and Conceptions of Political Order in Islamist 
Organizations, London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 45–93, 2018. 
doi:10.4324/9781315104867-3. 

[9]  E. Azani, “Hezbollah as a player in the Lebanese political arena-mutual influences,” Hezbollah: The 
Story of the Party of God, New York: Palgrave Macmillan pp. 137–173, 2011. 
doi:10.1057/9780230116290_6. 

[10]  “Hezbollah Strategic Shift: a global terrorist threat,” U.S. Government Publishing Office, 
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-113hhrg80122/html/CHRG-113hhrg80122.htm (accessed 
Oct. 20, 2023). 

[11]  F. Dionigi, Hezbollah, Islamist Politics, and International Society. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 
2015. 

[12]  R. E. Kanet, Routledge Handbook of Russian Security. Routledge: Abingdon, Oxon, 2019. 
[13]  K. P. Riehle, “Russian covert operations: Using history to establish motivations and bounds,” in 

Intelligence and National Security, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 737–744, 2020. 
doi:10.1080/02684527.2020.1794302. 

[14]  D. V. Gioe, “Cyber Operations and useful fools: The Approach of Russian Hybrid Intelligence,” in 
Intelligence and National Security, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 954–973, 2018. 
doi:10.1080/02684527.2018.1479345. 

[15]  K. P. Riehle, Russian Intelligence: A Case-Based Study of Russian Services and Missions Past and 
Present. National Intelligence Press, Bethesda, MD, 2022. 

[16]  D. D. Adamsky, “The impact of the Russian operation in Syria on Hezbollah’s operational art: A 
hypothesis,” in Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 414–430, 2018. 
doi:10.1080/1057610x.2018.1471971. 

[17]  A. Daher, “On the origins of Hezbollah,” Hezbollah, London: Hurst & Company, pp. 17–38, 2019. 
doi:10.1093/oso/9780190495893.003.0002. 



 DSS Vol. 4, 2023, pp.94-104 

104 

[18]  T. Nizameddin, “Squaring the middle east triangle in Lebanon: Russia and the Iran-syria-hezbollah 
nexus,” in Slavonic and East European Review, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 475–500, 2008. 
doi:10.1353/see.2008.0125. 

[19]  D. D. Adamsky, “The impact of the Russian operation in Syria on Hezbollah’s operational art: A 
hypothesis,” in Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 414–430, 2018. 
doi:10.1080/1057610x.2018.1471971. 

[20]  E. Stepanova, “Russia and conflicts in the Middle East: Regionalisation and implications for the West,” 
in The International Spectator, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 35–57, 2018. doi:10.1080/03932729.2018.1507135. 

[21]  S. Kelly, “Hezbollah is operating in Latin America. What does that mean for the U.S.?,” The Cipher 
Brief, https://www.thecipherbrief.com/hezbollah-is-operating-in-latin-america-what-does-that-mean-for-
the-us (accessed Oct. 20, 2023). 

[22]  “Hezbollah in Latin America - Implications for U.S. Homeland Security,” U.S. Government Publishing 
Office, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-112hhrg72255/html/CHRG-112hhrg72255.htm 
(accessed Oct. 20, 2023). 

[23] A. Toulu, “The Iranian revolutionary apparatus and Hezbollah in West Africa,” Hudson, 
https://www.hudson.org/node/44280 (accessed Oct. 20, 2023). 

[24] “Hezbollah Strategic Shift: a global terrorist threat,” U.S. Government Publishing Office, 
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-113hhrg80122/html/CHRG-113hhrg80122.htm (accessed 
Oct. 20, 2023). 


