Harris 2010.5 61 Tooth-formation standards for the primary teeth are quite scarce, largely because these teeth begin developing in utero where analysis is complicated and because dental researchers have avoided dealing with very young children, especially where irradiation is involved. A singular exception, due in large part to the tireless efforts of Arthur B. Lewis, is the analysis of primary tooth mineralization in children between birth and about 16 years of age (Moorrees et al., 1963a). While data from the earliest-forming teeth, the incisors, are unavailable, Moorrees, Fanning and Hunt (1963a) reported on the formative stages and the later exfoliation of three primary tooth types, specifically the canine, first and second molars in the mandible. This report, in the American Journal of Physical Anthropology, accompanies these authors’ better-known study of the permanent dentition (Moorrees et al., 1963b). Their study of the primary teeth has been useful in several studies, but the authors chose to present their data in graphical form only, which has been an impediment to using the data statistically. In hopes that these tabulated data will be more useful to others, I have converted the graphical data into more applicable tables of medians and standard deviations. To my knowledge, these are the only published data on the tooth mineralization of primary teeth that span the relevant postnatal age interval (neonates up to school age). Comparable radiographic data were collected in the Bolton-Brush Study (Cleveland, Ohio) as reviewed by Behrents (1985) and in the Child Research Council (Denver, Colorado) as reviewed by McCammon (1970), but these radiographs do not seem to have been analyzed to develop tooth-formation data. Demirjian and colleagues (e.g., Demirjian et al., 1982) also collected the needed data from their longitudinal study of French- Canadian children in Montreal, though these data do not Technical Note: Primary Tooth Mineralization and Exfoliation Ages Calculated from the Moorrees-Fanning- Hunt Study Edward F. Harris Department of Orthodontics, University of Tennessee, Memphis ABSTRACT Staging of the formation of teeth and shedding of the primary teeth are particularly useful for age estimation of archaeological and forensic specimens, as well as for gauging whether a child’s tempo of maturation is progressing within normal limits. Staging can be done using radiographs or with direct inspection of dental remains. Standards for the primary dentition are scarce, but obviously needed for young children. This note provides tables, by sex, of the normative ages of the mineralization of three mandibular tooth types (c, m1, m2) as well as of root resorption and times of shedding of these tooth types. The data are transformed from charts developed by Moorrees, Fanning and Hunt (1963 Am J Phys Anthropol 21:99-108). Conversion to numeric form is intended to aid in using these data for statistical comparisons. Dental Anthropology 2010;23(2):61-65. Stage Code Tooth Mineralization Coalescence of cusp C co Cusp outline complete C oc Crown ½ complete Cr ½ Crown ¾ complete Cr ¾ Crown complete Cr c Initial root formation R i Initial cleft formation Cl i Root length ¼ R ¼ Root length ½ R ½ Root length ¾ R ¾ Root length complete R c Apex ½ closed A ½ Apex closure complete A c Tooth Exfoliation One-fourth root reorption Res ¼ One-half root resorption Res ½ Three-Fourths root resorption Res ¾ TABLE 1. The stages of tooth formation and resorption developed by Moorrees and coworkers seem to be published. In contrast, there are several studies that report on the eruption ages of the primary teeth (e.g., Falkner, 1957; Infante, 1974; Delgado et al., 1975; Tanguay et al. 1986), based either on direct intraoral examinations or on serial dental casts (Moorrees, 1959). Correspondence: Edward F. Harris, Department of Orthodontics, University of Tennessee, Memphis 38163 E-mail: eharris@uthsc.edu 62 Formation Girls Boys Stage median sd median sd Primary canine C co • • • • C oc 0.1 0.09 0.2 0.09 Cr ½ 0.3 0.10 0.3 0.10 Cr ¾ 0.5 0.12 0.5 0.12 Cr c 0.7 0.14 0.7 0.14 R i 0.9 0.15 0.8 0.16 R ¼ 1.1 0.17 1.0 0.17 R ½ 1.3 0.20 1.3 0.20 R ¾ 1.8 0.25 1.9 0.25 R c 2.1 0.27 2.0 0.26 A ½ 2.5 0.32 2.5 0.32 A c 3.0 0.36 3.1 0.37 Primary first molar C co • • • • C oc • • • • Cr ½ 0.1 0.09 0.2 0.09 Cr ¾ 0.2 0.10 0.3 0.09 Cr c 0.3 0.11 0.5 0.12 R i 0.6 0.12 0.6 0.13 Cleft 0.6 0.12 0.7 0.14 R ¼ 0.6 0.14 0.8 0.15 R ½ 0.9 0.16 0.9 0.16 R ¾ 1.1 0.18 1.2 0.19 R c 1.3 0.19 1.3 0.20 A ½ 1.5 0.22 1.7 0.24 A c 1.8 0.25 2.0 0.26 Primary second molar C co • • • • C oc • • 0.2 0.09 Cr ½ 0.2 0.10 0.3 0.10 Cr ¾ 0.5 0.12 0.5 0.12 Cr c 0.7 0.14 0.7 0.14 R i 0.9 0.16 0.9 0.16 Cleft 1.0 0.16 1.0 0.16 R ¼ 1.3 0.20 1.3 0.21 R ½ 1.6 0.22 1.9 0.23 R¾ 1.9 0.26 2.0 0.21 R c 2.0 0.27 2.0 0.27 A ½ 2.4 0.30 2.4 0.31 A c 2.8 0.35 3.1 0.37 1Statistics are the median chronologic age and its standard deviation (sd). These norms were developed from serial x-rays taken on 136 boys and 110 girls from among those enrolled in the Fels Longitudinal Study, Yellow Springs, Ohio. TABLE 2. Median ages (years), by sex, for stages of mandibular primary tooth formation1 THE DATA As stated in their article, Moorrees et al. (1963b) collected data from the Fels Longitudinal Study located in Yellow Springs, Ohio (Roche, 1992). This is one of the premiere longitudinal growth studies in the world, following children from birth into biological adulthood. The Fels study had its inception in 1929, and from then until the early 1960s (when Moorrees and coworkers collected their data), between 500 and 600 children had been enrolled (Roche, 1992). Lateral and oblique headfilms (radiographs) were taken at 3-month intervals during the first year of life and at 6-month intervals thereafter (Moorrees et al., 1963a). These planar radiographs were an efficient means of visualizing all of the teeth with one or two films; this was in the era before panoramic films were available (Graber, 1966). Experience suggests that the researchers focused on the mandibular teeth because the tooth images are clearer in this arch, whereas the maxillary images are overlain with complex bony shadows. Strong intercorrelations between stages of homologous teeth in the two arches (Moorrees and Reed, 1954; Kent et al., 1978) can be used as an argument for restricting attention to just one arch. Moorrees et al. state that their standards are based on the serial radiographic records of 136 boys and 110 girls. Moorrees and coworkers thought the charts that they developed were most useful for clinical application. For a single case, this might be true. I used Photoshop CS3 to measure high-quality scans of he charts and then transformed these measurements back to decimal years. (Comparable tabulations of permanent tooth formation E.F. HARRIS Fig. 1. Sketches of the 3 stages of primary tooth root resorption used byMoorrees, Fanning and Hunt (1963a). 4 1 1 2 3 4 resorption resorption resorption single- rooted multi- rooted 63 Girls Boys Stage median sd median sd Canine Res ¼ 4.93 0.45 6.08 0.55 Res ½ 7.26 0.65 8.41 0.74 Res ¾ 8.73 0.76 9.79 0.84 Exfoliation 9.53 0.83 10.64 0.92 First molar, mesial root Res ¼ 4.90 0.45 5.45 0.49 Res ½ 7.25 0.64 7.58 0.68 Res ¾ 8.85 0.77 9.41 0.82 Exfoliation 10.12 0.87 10.79 0.93 First molar, distal root Res ¼ 5.17 0.48 6.39 0.58 Res ½ 7.68 0.66 8.35 0.73 Res ¾ 9.75 0.81 10.01 0.87 Exfoliation 10.12 0.87 10.79 0.93 Second molar, mesial root Res ¼ 6.09 0.55 6.65 0.59 Res ½ 8.31 0.73 8.61 0.74 Res ¾ 10.02 0.87 10.42 0.90 Exfoliation 11.13 0.96 11.67 1.00 Second molar, distal root Res ¼ 6.95 0.62 7.45 0.65 Res ½ 8.61 0.76 9.51 0.82 Res ¾ 9.95 0.87 11.08 0.95 Exfoliation 11.12 0.96 11.64 1.00 TABLE 3. Median ages (years), by sex, for stages of mandibular primary tooth resorption and exfoliation PRIMARY TOOTH RESORPTION standards [Moorrees et al., 1963b] are available in Harris and Buck, 2002.) THE RESEARCHERS As an aside, it is interesting to note the serendipity (synergism) of Moorrees, Fanning, and Hunt’s collaboration. Moorrees (b. 1916 – d. 2003) certainly had a knowledgeable interest in development of the dentition (see, e.g., Moorrees, 1959), and he was in a position at the Forsyth Dental Infirmary (Harvard School of Dental Medicine) to coordinate the study (Moorrees, 1993; Peck and Will, 2004). Elizabeth Fanning (b. 1918 – d. 2007) was trained in Australia as a dentist (Townsend, 2007), and she brought her expertise in scoring tooth-mineralization stages. Beginning with her thesis (Fanning, 1960), Fanning developed elaborate grading systems; these have generally been eschewed by subsequent workers as too detailed to allow high intraobserver reliability in their hands. However, if mastered, these stages of short duration provide fine-grained analysis. Ed Hunt (b. 1922 – d. 1991) a physical anthropologist at Harvard University had research interests in growth and development, but he also had a strong background in quantitative methods (Baker, 1992), and he was the team member who actually calculated the probit analyses (e.g., Finney, 1971) that yielded the median ages at each stage of tooth formation and of exfoliation. The collaboration involved Moorrees overseeing the study, Fanning scoring the tooth stages from the films, and Hunt calculating the statistics. The unsung hero in this scenario is Arthur B. (“Buzz”) Lewis, a dental specialist in orthodontics, who maintained a private practice as well as an appointment on the orthodontic faculty at Ohio State University throughout his professional life. Lewis also was a research associate at the Fels Research Institute for a full half-century (Mayerson, 1996), and most dental anthropologists will recall his numerous publications with Stanley Garn. Lewis is the man responsible for taking the dental radiographs of the participants at Fels, with X-rays taken every 3 months for the first year, then at 6-month intervals after that. Without the radiographs of these infants—a considerable undertaking in itself—there would have been no data to collect. PRIMARY TOOTH FORMATION The original charts record two sequential processes, one is the formation of these three primary teeth (c, m1, m2) that begin mineralization as early as the second trimester (Lunt and Law, 1974) and continue till about 3 years of age. The second process, some years later, occurs during the “second transition” of dental development (van der Linden and Duterloo, 1976), when these primary teeth are exfoliated and replaced by the permanent canine and premolars in each quadrant. Shedding of these primary teeth occurs between 9 and 11 years of age, with subsequent emergence of the successors. Moorrees et al. used the same 12 stages of tooth mineralization as they used elsewhere to score the permanent teeth (Moorrees et al. 1963b). One additional stage (cleft formation) was used to note the interradicular area of multi-rooted teeth. The interval from about 2 ½ years (when all 20 primary teeth have emerged into occlusion) to about 6 years of age (when the permanent first molar emerges) is viewed as the interval of the intact primary dentition. These data (Tables 1, 2) show that these three teeth begin their resorptive processes by about 5 years of age (somewhat later in boys) when the canines and first molars initiate root resorption. This is, of course, some years before exfoliation. Histologically, osteoclasts are congregated and mature ahead of the successor’s dental sac (Wise et al., 1999, 2002, 2008), and these multinucleated cells remove the bone and deciduous tooth roots ahead of the replacement tooth. Timely resorption of the primary tooth’s root is necessary for normal eruption of the permanent tooth. The biochemical signaling for lysis is from the dental follicle of the permanent successor. This is why, when the successor is congenitally absent, exfoliation of the primary tooth is delayed, often for many years though roots still tend to 64 E.F. HARRIS resorb albeit slowly (e.g., Haselden et al., 2001; Nordquist et al. 2005; Bjerklin et al., 2008). Primary tooth mineralization progresses more rapidly than in the permanent successors, and this is reflected in smaller overall sizes, thinner tissue components, and lower enamel and dentin densities (e.g., McDonald, 1978; Wilson 1989; Hunter, 2000). The Moorrees charts (Table 2) show that about half of the crowns are mineralized in utero, so their staging is missed even when radiographs are taken at birth. Results show that girls progress faster than boys. Differences are small and not significant statistically (based on univariate comparisons of 95% confidence limits), but younger median ages in girls are widespread across the data. Parenthetically, this raises the interesting question of ethnic and environmental influences on rates of development. Assessed multivariately, Tanguay and coworkers (1986) found earlier tooth primary emergence for boys, though other studies have reported different results, generally no discernible sex difference (Demirjian, 1978). The first molar is particularly fast-forming. It completes crown formation (amelogenesis) by about 4 months after birth and roots are apexified by 2 years of age. The other two tooth types form more slowly, with average crown completion at about 0.7 years (~ 8 months), and with root completion (A c ) by 3 years of age. TOOTH EXFOLIATION Shedding of these teeth occurs between about 10 and 11 years of age (Table 3), which is consistent with conventional mnemonics that these primary teeth are shed and their successors emerge around the 2-year interval of the second transition (van der Linden and Duterloo, 1976) Interestingly, resorption of the roots of these primary teeth begins several years earlier. Resorption is noted on the canine and first molar by about 5 years of age. Three stages of root resorption were scored, along with exfoliation as the ultimate event (Fig. 1). Initial evidence (R¼) of resorption occurs late, between 6 and 7 years of age, for the second molar. Durations of the exfoliation process can be gauged by comparing the earliest evidence of root loss (R¼) to when the tooth actually is lost. The process takes 4 to 5 years on the average, but somewhat less for the canine (~ 4 years) than the two molars. Fanning’s attention to detail allows us to see that the mesial root of the molars resorb faster than the distal root. This may be due to the mesial crown tip of molars (e.g., Dempster et al. 1963), so the mesial root is under greater compression when the molar is under pressure. This cause is speculative, but precocity of the mesial root attaining resorption stages is consistent across the data. Table 3 also discloses the strong trend for girls to shed these teeth ahead of boys. Normal shedding of a primary tooth involves lysis of the roots and of the bone ahead of the succeeding tooth (Wise and King, 2008), so the female precedence that has long been known for permanent tooth emergence (Hurme 1949) is part and parcel of this process. OVERVIEW This note presents tabled statistics for three primary mandibular tooth types (c, m1, m2) with regard to their mineralization (Table 2) and their subsequent resorption (Table 3). Tables are transformed from the graphs produced Fig. 2. Plots of the median ages of primary tooth resorption. Girls tend to be developmentally ahead of boys, though the patterns of change and the sequencing are similar in the two sexes. Mesial root of m1 tends to be the first of these three teeth to exhibit resorption, while the distal root of m2 is the last to resorb. Sequencing coincides with the high prevalence of cases where m1 exfoliates earlier than m2 (and the first premolar emerges earlier than the second). 65PRIMARY TOOTH RESORPTION by Moorrees et al. (1963a) with the intent of making the data more usable for statistical applications. LITERATURE CITED Baker PT. 1992. Obituary: Edward Eyre Hunt, Jr. (1922- 1991). Am J Phys Anthropol 89:123-125. Bjerklin K, Al-Najjar M, Kårestedt H, Andrén A. 2008. Agenesis of mandibular second premolars with retained primary molars: a longitudinal radiographic study of 99 subjects from 12 years of age to adulthood. Eur J Orthod 30:254-261. Behrents RG. 1985. In search of truth for the greater good of man: a chronological account of the Bolton-Brush growth studies. Cleveland: Bolton Study Press of Case Western Reserve University. Delgado H, Habicht JP, Yarbrough C, Lechtig A, Martorell, R, Malina R, Klein R. 1975. Nutritional status and the timing of the deciduous tooth eruption. Am J Clin Nutr 28:216-224. Demirjian A. 1978. The dentition. In: Human growth, Vol 2. postnatal growth. Falkner F, Tanner JM, eds. New York: Plenum Publishers, p 413-444. Demirjian A, La Palme L, Thibault HW. 1982. La Croissance staturo-ponde’rale des Enfants Canadiens-Francais de la Naissance a 36 Mois. Union Med Can 112:153-163. Dempster WT, Adams WJ, Duddies RA. 1963. Arrangement in the jaws of the roots of the teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 67:779-797. Falkner F. 1957. Deciduous tooth eruption. Arch Dis Child 32;386-391. Fanning EA. 1960. A longitudinal study of tooth formation and root resorption. D.D.S. thesis, University of New Zealand. Finney DJ. 1971. Probit analysis, 3rd ed. Cambridge, Great Britain: Cambridge University Press. Graber TM. 1966. Panoramic radiography. Angle Orthod 36:293-311. Harris EF, Buck A. 2002. Tooth mineralization: a technical note on the Moorrees-Fanning-Hunt standards. Dental Anthropology 16:15-20. Haselden K, Hobkirk JA, Goodman JR, Jones SP, Hemmings KW. 2001. Root resorption in retained deciduous canine and molar teeth without permanent successors in patients with severe hypodontia. Int J Paediatr Dent 11:171-178. Hunter ML. 2000. Erosion of deciduous and permanent dental hard tissue in the oral environment. J Dent 28:257-263. Hurme VO. 1949. Ranges of normalcy in the eruption of permanent teeth. J Dent Child 16:11-15. Infante PF. 1974. Sex differences in the chronology of deciduous tooth emergence in White and Black children. J Dent Res 53:418. Kent RL Jr, Reed RB, Moorrees CF. 1978. Associations in emergence age among permanent teeth. Am J Phys Anthropol 48:131-142. Lunt RC, Law DB. 1974. A review of the chronology of calcification of deciduous teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 89:599-606. Mayerson M. 1996. In memoriam: Arthur B. Lewis (1909- 1996). Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 110:329. McCammon RW. 1970. Human growth and development. Springfield: Charles C Thomas, Publisher. McDonald RE. 1978. Dentistry for the child and adolescent, 3rd ed. St Louis. CV Mosby, p 39-44. Moorrees CFA. 1959. The dentition of the growing child: a longitudinal study of dental development between 3 and 18 years of age. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Moorrees CF. 1993. Reflections on an academic career in teaching and research. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 104:516-522. Moorrees CFA, Fanning EA, Hunt EE Jr. 1963a. Formation and resorption of three deciduous teeth in children. Am J Phys Anthropol 21:99-108. Moorrees CFA, Fanning EA, Hunt EE Jr. 1963b. Age variation of formation stages for ten permanent teeth. J Dent Res 42:1490-1502. Moorrees CF, Reed RB. 1954. Biometrics of crowding and spacing of the teeth in the mandible. Am J Phys Anthropol 12:77-88. Nordquist I, Lennartsson B, Paulander J. 2005. Primary teeth in adults—a pilot study. Swed Dent J 29:27-34. Peck S, Will LA. 2004. In memoriam: Coenraad F.A. Moorrees, 1916-2003. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 125:396-398. Roche AF. 1992. Growth, maturation and body composition: the Fels Longitudinal Study, 1929-1991. Cambridge, Great Britain: Cambridge University Press. Tanguay R, Buschang PH, Demirjian A. 1986. Sexual dimorphism in the emergence of deciduous teeth: Its relationship with growth components in height. Am J Phys Anthropol 69:511-515. Townsend G. 2007. Comments. Dental Anthropology 20:25-27. van der Linden FPGM, and Duterloo HS. 1976. Development of the human dentition. Hagerstown: Harper and Rowe Publishers. Wilson PR. 1989. Mineralization differences between human deciduous and permanent enamel measured by quantitative microradiography. Arch Oral Biol 34:85-88. Wise GE, Frazier-Bowers S, D’Souza RN. 2002. Cellular, molecular, and genetic determinants of tooth eruption. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 13:323-334. Wise GE, Huang H, Que BG. 1999. Gene expression of potential tooth eruption molecules in the dental follicle of the mouse. Eur J Oral Sci 107:482-486. Wise GE, King GJ. 2008. Mechanisms of tooth eruption and orthodontic tooth movement. J Dent Res 87:414-434.