Vol 51 No 4 Okt-Des 2018.indd 210210 The evaluation of mandibular bone density in chronic periodontitis models Yuliana Mahdiyah Da’at Arina,1 F. Ferdiansyah,2 and Mohamad Rubianto3 1Department of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Jember, Jember – Indonesia 2Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Dr. Soetomo General Hospital, Surabaya – Indonesia 3Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya – Indonesia ABSTRACT Background: Bone density, an important factor in functional bone quality, can affect the success of implant osteointegration or orthodontic treatment. A number of studies report that chonic periodontitis constitutes one risk factor of osteoporosis characterized by low bone mineral density and that the mandible is susceptible to osteoporosis. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate mandibular bone density in animal subjects suffering from chronic periodontitis. Methods: 40 male Wistar rats were divided into four chronic periodontitis groups and four control groups (each group n=5). As chronic periodontitis models, the subjects were injected with 2×109 CFU/ml of Porphyromonas gingivalis in the sulcular gingiva, whereas control group members were injected with normal saline. After 2, 3, 4 and 6-week injection periods, the subjects were sacrificed and radiographic examination of the mandibular bone subsequently performed. Mandibular bone density was evaluated by histometric analysis. Results: The mandibular bone density in members of the chronic periodontitis group was significantly lower than those of the control group (p<0.05). The reduced mandibular bone density in the chronic periodontitis group was in line with the protracted bouts of periodontitis. Conclusion: Reduced mandibular bone density was found in the chronic periodontitis model. The longer the duration of a bout of chronic periodontitis, the greater the reduction in mandibular bone density. Keywords: chronic periodontitis; mandibular bone density; Porphyromonas gingivalis Correspondence: Yuliana Mahdiyah Da’at Arina, Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Jember. Jl. Kalimantan 37, Jember 68121, Indonesia. Email: yulianamahdiyah@gmail.com Research Report INTRODUCTION Bone density is an important factor determining functional bone quality, with lower mandibular bone density impairing both implant osteointegration and orthodontic treatment. During dental implant therapy, bone quality should be evaluated because of its importance as a predictor of implant osseointegration. There are many factors that influence successful implant osseointegration, including bone mineral density. Poor bone quality, characterised by a thin cortex, sparse trabeculae or altered trabecular architecture, eventually results in poor implant stabilization and longer osseointegration.1 Osteoporosis, a form of bone disturbance characterised by low bone mineral density, constitutes a condition negatively affecting bone quality. The jawbones, particularly the mandible, can be affected by osteoporosis which decreases mandibular bone density.2 In addition to bone mineral density, trabecular bone structure can be evaluated as a means of determining bone quality. A dense mandibular alveolar trabecular pattern in a dentate subject represents a reliable indicator of normal bone mineral density, while a sparse trabecular pattern confirms low bone mineral density.3 Chonic periodontitis has been reported as one of the risk factors relating to osteoporosis since the increasing severity of periodontitis exacerbates susceptibility to the condition.4 Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) 2018 December; 51(4): 210–215 Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) p-ISSN: 1978-3728; e-ISSN: 2442-9740. Accredited No. 32a/E/KPT/2017. Open access under CC-BY-SA license. Available at http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/index.php/MKG DOI: 10.20473/j.djmkg.v51.i4.p210–215 mailto:yulianamahdiyah@gmail.com http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/index.php/MKG http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/j.djmkg.v51.i4.p210-215 211 Arina, et al./Dent. J. (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) 2018 December; 51(4): 210–215 Chronic periodontitis constitutes a severe infectious disease resulting in inflammed supporting tissues of the teeth, progressive attachment loss and bone loss.5 Considerable research has been conducted into the relationship between periodontitis and osteoporosis. However, to date, the results remain inconclusive. Several studies found a positive correlation between chronic periodontitis and osteoporosis, while others did not. The investigation conducted by Lafzi et al.6 indicated that the bone mineral density of patients suffering from chronic periodontitis is lower than those afflicted with gingivitis. The mandibular bone density found in individuals with chronic periodontitis was significantly lower than that of healthy individuals.7 However, another study reported that no correlation existed between chronic periodontitis and osteoporosis.8,9 Therefore, understanding the nature of mandibular bone density in cases of chronic periodontitis remains a crucial research topic. Consequently, the aim of this study was to evaluate the mandibular bone density in a subject suffering from chronic periodontitis that had been induced by a local injection of Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis). MATERIALS AND METHODS This study constituted a true experiment incorporating a completely randomized design. Its experimental procedures were all performed under a protocol approved by Ethical Clearance Certificate Number 017/HRECC.FODM /II/ 2017, issued by the Ethical Committee of the Faculty of Dental Medicine at Universitas Airlangga. The protocol to develop a model of chronic periodontitis was based on previous study with minimal modification.10 The bacterial suspension was prepared by means of the following procedure. P. gingivalis (ATCC 33277, MediMark, France) was cultured at 37°C on trypton soya agar (TSA) plates with 10% sheep blood, supplemented with 0.4 μl/ml vitamin K and hemin in an oxygen-free atmosphere (80% nitrogen, 10% carbon dioxide and 10% hydrogen). After 14 days of growth on TSA, certain P. gingivalis colonies were selected and a solution of 2x109 CFU/ml in 100 μl of 0,9% sodium chloride subsequently prepared for immediate use. Gram’s method was applied to confirm the purity of the colonies. Chronic periodontitis was induced in Wistar-strain Rattus novergicus subjects by injection of P. gingivalis into the gingiva. 3-4 month-old male subjects (n = 40), each 200-220 grams in weight, were randomly divided into four periodontitis groups and four control groups, each containing five members. The periodontitis group subjects were injected three times a week at 2-day intervals with 0.05 ml live P. gingivalis at a concentration of 2109 CFU/ml into the buccal and lingual subgingival sulcus area between the first and second left mandibular molar. The injection involved the use of a tuberculin disposable syringe (OneMed, Indonesia) with a 30 gauge needle (BD PrecisionGlideTM Needle, USA). Control group members were injected with normal saline in accordance with the periodontitis group protocol. For the duration of the experiment, the subjects were housed in plastic cages, fed a standard laboratory diet and provided with water ad libitum. The periodontitis and control group subjects were sacrificed during the 2nd., 3rd., 4th. and 6th. weeks following injection. The mandibular specimens were harvested and fixed in normal buffer formalin. Radiographic examination was performed to evaluate the alveolar bone resorption as a clinical symptom of chronic periodontitis. The sample was confirmed as a case of chronic periodontitis if alveolar bone resorption was present in the interproximal area between the first and second molar. Furthermore, the mandibular specimens were decalcified in 10% ethylenediamine-tetra-acetic acid (EDTA) at pH 7, which was replaced twice a week during a period of 6-8 weeks until the process was completed. The decalcified specimens were subsequently submitted to routine histologic processing and embedded in paraffin. In order to facilitate histologic descriptive analysis, each sample was sliced into 5 mm continuous sections in the mesial-distal direction and prepared for haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. Histologic analysis was performed on mandibular bone from the mesial section of the first molar mesial root and the distal section of the second molar distal root. The mandibular bone density was considered to be the percentage of trabecular bone volume calculated by dividing the trabecular bone area by the total bone area, including the trabecular bone and bone marrow. All examination procedures involved the use of a Nikon H600L light microscope at 100x magnification fully equipped with a DS Fi2 300 megapixel digital camera and calibrated image processor using Nikkon Image System software. Two examiners unsighted as to the allocation of samples and subjects to specific groups performed this analysis with the average of two sets of results being calculated as the data of each sample. Data was presented in the form of a mean ± SD. The differences between the mandibular bone density of groups were analysed using one-way ANOVA followed by an LSD post hoc test. The data was considered statistically significant when the p value was less than 0.05. RESULTS The result of radiographic examination showed there to be alveolar bone resorption in the interproximal area between the first and second molar in all periodontitis group members which was confirmed as a chronic periodontitis model (Figure 1). The alveolar bone crest resorption was found in the 2-week periodontitis group and the alveolar bone resorption was greater in line with the injection period. The mandibular bone density of all control groups was not significantly different. The average mandibular bone density of the periodontitis groups was lower than that of Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) p-ISSN: 1978-3728; e-ISSN: 2442-9740. Accredited No. 32a/E/KPT/2017. Open access under CC-BY-SA license. Available at http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/index.php/MKG DOI: 10.20473/j.djmkg.v51.i4.p210–215 http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/index.php/MKG http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/j.djmkg.v51.i4.p210-215 212Arina, et al./Dent. J. (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) 2018 December; 51(4): 210–215 the control groups (Table 1), but the difference between the 2-week periodontitis group and control group was not significant. The mandibular bone density between the 3, 4 and 6-week periodontitis and control groups was significantly different (p<0.05). The mandibular bone density in the periodontitis groups was more reduced than that in the control groups. The greatest reduction occurred in the 6-week periodontitis group (Table 1). The reduced mandibular bone density coincided with the injection periods (Figure 2). The longer the period during which injections were administered, the lower the mandibular bone density. The mandibular bone density of the 4 and 6-week periodontitis groups was significantly lower than that of the 2-week group (p<0.05). A significant difference existed between the respective mandibular bone density of the 3 and 6-week periodontitis groups (p<0.05). However, no significant differences were observed between the 3 and 4 -week periodontitis groups or between the 4 and 6 -week periodontitis groups. The histological feature of the mandibular bone density in the periodontitis and control groups is presented in Figure 3. The histological feature of the control groups was a dense and compact trabecular bone, whereas the bone marrow was narrow. This result was similar to the histological feature of the 2-week periodontitis group. In the 3, 4 and 6-week periodontitis groups, the bone marrow was wider and greater in quantity, while in the trabecular bone it was narrow. This sparse trabecular bone in the periodontitis groups is considered to have a lower mandibular bone density than that of the control groups. DISCUSSION Bone density is an important factor influencing functional bone quality. Reduced mandibular bone density will impair implant osteointegration or orthodontic treatment. Certain diseases are known to reduce bone density, including osteoporosis which can affect the mandibular bone. An association exists between osteoporosis and periodontitis4,6,7 and it is assumed that chronic periodontitis not only causes reduced alveolar bone height, but also reduced bone density. Therefore, in this study, the mandibular bone density of a subject which had suffered from chronic periodontitis for a protracted period was evaluated. Animal subjects have long been used to investigate the pathogenesis of periodontitis, because studies involving humans are limited due to the diffi culty of controlling the pathogenesis of periodontal disease.11 Rats were employed as research subjects because the periodontal anatomy of their molar region shares several similarities with that of humans.12 An study of periodontal disease in animals plays an important role in facilitating the study of defi ned aspects of periodontitis, including: pathogenesis, the development and progress of disease.11 There are certain methods of initiating experimental periodontitis, including: ligature, injection of a bacterial or pathogenic component, and oral gavage.12 In this study, a model of chronic periodontitis as occurs naturally in humans was induced by localized injection of live P. gingivalis. P. gingivalis has been identifi ed as one major periodontal pathogen of chronic periodontitis.13 About 40–100% of adults affl icted by A B C D E F G H Figure 1. Representative radiographic images of the mandibular bone in the chronic periodontitis model. A greater degree of alveolar bone resorption occurs in the periodontitis groups compared to the control groups. The 2-week periodontitis group presented resorption in the alveolar bone crest (red arrow) (E), a greater degree of resorption occurring in the 3-week periodontitis group (F), increased resorption at 4 weeks (G) and the highest level in the 6-week periodontitis group (H). The control group at 2, 3, 4 and 6 weeks is shown in images A,B,C and D respectively. Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) p-ISSN: 1978-3728; e-ISSN: 2442-9740. Accredited No. 32a/E/KPT/2017. Open access under CC-BY-SA license. Available at http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/index.php/MKG DOI: 10.20473/j.djmkg.v51.i4.p210–215 http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/index.php/MKG http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/j.djmkg.v51.i4.p210-215 213 Arina, et al./Dent. J. (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) 2018 December; 51(4): 210–215 Figure 2. The mandibular bone density of the chronic periodontitis model at various injection times. A B C D E F G H Figure 3. A histological section of mandibular bone in the periodontitis and control groups (x100). The trabecular bone of the control group after 2 weeks (A), 3 weeks (B), 4 weeks (C) and 6 weeks (D) showed significant density. The 2-week periodontitis group demonstrated the same pattern as the 2-week control group (A). The sparse trabecular bone with wider bone marrow (black arrow) was present in periodontitis groups at 3 weeks (F), 4 weeks (G) and 6 weeks (H). Table 1. The percentage of mandibular bone density in a chronic periodontitis model Average (nGroup ±SD) p 2 week 58.43 (±9.18)5Control d 0.000* 5Periodontitis 55.41 (±9.84)cd Control3 week 57.06 (±3.17)5 d 47.64 (±4.37)5Periodontitis bc Control4 week 55.97(±5.55)5 d 42.22 (±6.66)5Periodontitis ab 6 week Control 54.60 (±5.03)5 cd Periodontitis 5 36.25 (±4.37)a *significant at α=0.05 a,b,c,d the same superscript showed no difference between groups Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) p-ISSN: 1978-3728; e-ISSN: 2442-9740. Accredited No. 32a/E/KPT/2017. Open access under CC-BY-SA license. Available at http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/index.php/MKG DOI: 10.20473/j.djmkg.v51.i4.p210–215 http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/index.php/MKG http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/j.djmkg.v51.i4.p210-215 214Arina, et al./Dent. J. (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) 2018 December; 51(4): 210–215 periodontitis have been infected by these opportunistic bacteria.14 This research confi rmed a reduction in alveolar bone height of the periodontitis groups compared with that of the control group following injection of live P. gingivalis (Figure1). Alveolar bone crest resorption was detected in the 2-week periodontitis groups and increased over time. The results reported here were similar to those of the research conducted by Han et al.15 and Zhang et al.16 indicating that P. gingivalis infection results in increased bone resorption. Numerous reviews explain the bone resorption mechanism in periodontitis. In short, the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and other bacterial toxins can stimulate the immune cells and osteoblast to release proinfl ammatory cytokines IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, prostaglandin E2, komponen MMPs and to increase the RANKL/OPG ratio that regulates the proliferation, differentiation and activation of osteoclast resulting in bone resorption.17 P. gingivalis LPS, lipids and metabolic products have been reported as possessing the ability to modulate RANKL and/or OPG expression in osteoblasts to stimulate osteoclastogenesis.15 In many reports, alveolar bone loss can be detected as early as two weeks after the fi nal oral bacterial infection or three weeks after initiating infection,18 although the study conducted by de Molon et al.11 found that oral infection through P. gingivalis was ineffective at inducing alveolar bone resorption compared with the ligature model. The different strains, concentration of P.gingivalis used in the study and the length of the experimental period may explain the variability of the research results. In this study, subjects were injected with 100μl live-P.gingivalis at a concentration of 2×109 CFU/ml a total of eighteen times, while in the research conducted by Molon et al. 11 subjects were infected fi ve times with 1×109 CFU/ml. This investigation demonstrated that chronic periodontitis resulted in both reduced alveolar bone height and bone density, while a reduction in mandibular bone density was observed in the periodontitis group (see Table 1). The sparse trabecular bone was observed in the 3-week, 4-week and 6-week periodontitis groups (Figure 3) and indicated lower mandibular bone density.3 The lowest bone density was that of the 6-week periodontitis group. This reduced mandibular bone density increased progessively during the period of the experiment (Figure 2). This study indicated that chronic periodontitis not only reduces alveolar height, but also bone density, thereby paralleling the fi ndings of a clinical study completed by Tonguc et al.7 that the mandibular bone mineral density of subjects suffering from periodontitis was signifi cantly lower than that of the periodontally healthy subjects. A study of animal subjects conducted by Zhang et al.16 demonstrated signifi cantly decreased residual alveolar bone volume and mineral density in P. gingivalis-infected animals compared with sham infected controls. Similar to the alveolar bone resorption which appeared in radiographic images, the reduction in mandibular bone density among periodontitis group members was found to be greater in more prolonged periods. The 6-week periodontitis group presented the largest reduction in mandibular bone density. However, although reduced mandibular bone density was detected in the 2-week periodontitis group, a signifi cant difference was found early in the 3-week periodontitis group. From this result, it can be assumed that in chronic periodontitis, alveolar crest resorption occurs earlier than reduced bone density. Nevertheless, further study is required to confi rm the validity of this assumption. The mechanism of reduced mandibular bone density in chronic periodontitis has yet to be clearly explained, although there is theoretical uncoupling between bone destruction and remodelling. Increased osteoclastic destruction, decreased osteoblastic formation, or a combination of the two will reduce bone density.19 In addition to P. gingivalis possessing the ability to stimulate osteoclastogenesis, the components of P. gingivalis can inhibit the differentiation and osteogenesis of osteoblasts, thereby impeding alveolar bone formation.20 Several potential questions emerge from the results of this study, for example, whether the mechanism of reduced bone density is the same as that of alveolar resorption, which bone cells play a dominant role in that mechanism and whether a specific cytokine determining the timing of reduced bone density exists. This study successfully showed that chronic periodontitis reduced mandibular bone density which was also found to occur during orthodontic tooth movement. However, in the latter case, the reduced bone density recovered to its pre-orthodontic treatment level.21 It was interesting to investigate whether the reduced mandibular bone density caused by chronic periodontitis can be repaired following periodontal treatment, or whether it will be continue even if bacterial infection has been cured. However, based on result of this study, mandibular bone density examination is recommended for chronic periodontitis patients, especially those due to receive a dental implant or planning orthodontic treatment. The role of mandibular bone density in chronic periodontitis remains a critical topic for investigation. Futher studies should explore the mechanism that promotes a reduction in mandibular bone density as a result of chronic periodontitis, particularly in order to discover the key molecule or cytokine in the pathogenesis of reduced mandibular bone density. Such investigation would support the prevention and treatment of reduced mandibular bone density caused by chronic periodontitis. In conclusion, reduced mandibular bone density was found to have occurred in a chronic periodontitis model which suggests that the condition constitutes a risk factor in osteoporosis. The longer the periods of chronic periodontitis, the greater the reduction in mandibular bone density. Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) p-ISSN: 1978-3728; e-ISSN: 2442-9740. Accredited No. 32a/E/KPT/2017. Open access under CC-BY-SA license. Available at http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/index.php/MKG DOI: 10.20473/j.djmkg.v51.i4.p210–215 http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/index.php/MKG http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/j.djmkg.v51.i4.p210-215 215 Arina, et al./Dent. J. (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) 2018 December; 51(4): 210–215 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The authors express their gratitude to the Directorate of Research and Community Service, Directorate General of Research and Development Enhancement, Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education, Republic of Indonesia (Research Contract Number: 058/SP2H/LT/ DRPM/2018) for its financial support of this research. REFERENCES 1. Newman MG, Takei HH, Klokkevold PR, Carranza FA. Carranza’s clinical periodontology. 12th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2015. p. 706-22. 2. Yuce HB, Toker H, Ozdemir H, Goze F. Effects of two experimental models of osteoporosis on alveolar bone: histopathologic and densitometr ic study. Oral Health Dent Manag. 2014; 13(4): 915– 20. 3. Jonasson G, Billhult A. Mandibular bone structure, bone mineral density, and clinical variables as fracture predictors: a 15-year follow-up of female patients in a dental clinic. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013; 116(3): 362–8. 4. Lohana M, Suragimath G, Abbayya K, Varma S, Zope S, Kale V. A study to assess and correlate osteoporosis and periodontitis in selected population of Maharashtra. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015; 9(6): ZC46-50. 5. Newman MG, Takei HH, Klokkevold PR, Carranza FA. Carranza’s clinical periodontology. 12th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2015. p. 309-20. 6. Lafzi A, Amid R, Kadkhodazadeh M, Ahrara F. Is there any association between systemic bone mineral density and clinical manifestations of periodontal disease? J Periodontol Implant Dent. 2012; 4(2): 49–55. 7. Tonguç MÖ, Büyükkaplan UŞ, Fentoğlu Ö, Gümüş BA, Çerçi SS, Kırzıoğlu FY. Comparison of bone mineral density in the jaws of patients with and without chronic periodontitis. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2012; 41(6): 509–14. 8. Brennan-Calanan R M, Genco R J, Wilding GE, Hovey K M, Trevisan M, Wactawski-Wende J. Osteoporosis and oral infection: independent risk factors for oral bone loss. J Dent Res. 2008; 87(4): 323–7. 9. Guiglia R, Di Fede O, Lo Russo L, Sprini D, Rini G-B, Campisi G. Osteoporosis, jawbones and periodontal disease. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013; 18(1): e93–9. 10. Kusumawardani B, Arina YMD, Purwandhono A. Evaluation of the placental development and fetal growth in a pregnant rat model induced by periodontal disease. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015; 122(S1): 9–10. 11. de Molon RS, de Avila ED, Boas Nogueira AV, Chaves de Souza JA, Avila-Campos MJ, de Andrade CR, Cirelli JA. Evaluation of the host response in various models of induced periodontal disease in mice. J Periodontol. 2014; 85(3): 465–77. 12. Oz HS, Puleo DA. Animal models for periodontal disease. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011; 2011: 1–8. 13. How KY, Song KP, Chan KG. Porphyromonas gingivalis: an overview of periodontopathic pathogen below the gum line. Front Microbiol. 2016; 7: 1–14. 14. Mysak J, Podzimek S, Sommerova P, Lyuya-Mi Y, Bartova J, Janatova T, Prochazkova J, Duskova J. Porphyromonas gingivalis: major periodontopathic pathogen overview. J Immunol Res. 2014; 2014: 1–8. 15. Han X, Lin X, Yu X, Lin J, Kawai T, LaRosa KB, Taubman MA. Porphyromonas gingivalis infection-associated periodontal bone resorption is dependent on receptor activator of NF-kB ligand. Infect Immun. 2013; 81(5): 1502–9. 16. Zhang W, Ju J, Rigney T, Tribble G. Porphyromonas gingivalis infection increases osteoclastic bone resorption and osteoblastic bone formation in a periodontitis mouse model. BMC Oral Health. 2014; 14: 1–9. 17. Hienz SA, Paliwal S, Ivanovski S. Mechanisms of bone resorption in periodontitis. J Immunol Res. 2015; 2015: 1–10. 18. Graves DT, Li J, Cochran DL. Inflammation and uncoupling as mechanisms of periodontal bone loss. J Dent Res. 2011; 90(2): 143–53. 19. Sims NA, Martin TJ. Coupling the activities of bone formation and resorption: a multitude of signals within the basic multicellular unit. Bonekey Rep. 2014; 3: 1–10. 20. Di Benedetto A, Gigante I, Colucci S, Grano M. Periodontal disease: linking the primary inflammation to bone loss. Clin Dev Immunol. 2013; 2013: 1–7. 21. Yu J-H, Huang H-L, Liu C-F, Wu J, Li Y-F, Tsai M-T, Hsu J-T. Does orthodontic treatment affect the alveolar bone density? Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95(10): 1–10. Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) p-ISSN: 1978-3728; e-ISSN: 2442-9740. Accredited No. 32a/E/KPT/2017. Open access under CC-BY-SA license. Available at http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/index.php/MKG DOI: 10.20473/j.djmkg.v51.i4.p210–215 http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/index.php/MKG http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/j.djmkg.v51.i4.p210-215