� Vol. 45. No. 1 March 2012 Orthodontic treatment considerations in Down syndrome patients Sianiwati Goenharto Department of Orthodontics Faculty of Dentistry, Airlangga University Surabaya - Indonesia abstract Background: Down syndrome is an easily recognized congenital disease anomaly, a common autosomal chromosomal anomaly with high prevalence of malocclusion. Orthodontic treatment demand should be high but it seems difficult to be done because of specific condition of disability. Purpose: The purpose of this literature review was to discribe the orthodontic problems found in Down syndrome patients and several consideration that shoud be done to treat them. reviews: Many studies report the high prevalence of malocclusion among people with Down syndrome. There is a greater frequency of clas III relationship, crossbite, crowding and also open bite. Several problems might appear in the treatment because of dental, medical, mental, and behavioural factor. Conclusion: It is concluded that orthodonic treatment can be performed in Down syndrome patient, although several difficulties may appear. Good consideration in mental, behavior, medical and also dental condition will influence whether the treatment will success or not. Special care and facilities will support the orthodontic treatment. Key words: Down syndrome, orthodontic, malocclusion abstrak latar belakang: Sindroma Down adalah suatu kelainan congenital yang mudah dikenali, merupakan kelaian kromosom autosomal yang cukup banyak terjadi, dengan prevalensi maloklusi cukup tinggi. Seharusnya permintaan akan perawatan ortodonti juga tinggi meskipun tampaknya sulit dilakukan karena adanya kondisi ketidakmampuan/cacat yang spesifik. tujuan: Tujuan studi pustaka ini adalah untuk menggambarkan problem perawatan ortodonti pada penderita sindroma Down dan pertimbangan apa yang sebaiknya diambil untuk mengatasi masalah tersebut. tinjauan pustaka: Banyak penelitian melaporkan tentang prevalensi maloklusi yang tinggi pada penderita sindroma Down. Maloklusi yang sering dijumpai adalah relasi klas III, gigitan silang, berdesakan dan juga gigitan terbuka. Problem dapat terjadi saat perawatan ortodonti karena adanya faktor dental, medis, mental dan tingkah laku penderita. Kesimpulan: Disimpulkan bahwa perawatan ortodonti masih dapat dilakukan pada penderita sindroma Down meskipun dengan beberapa kesulitan. Pertimbangan mental, tingkah laku, kondisi medis sistemik dan kondisi dental, akan mempengaruhi hasil perawatan. Tindakan dan fasilitas khusus diperlukan untuk menunjang suksesnya perawatan ortodonti pada penderita sindroma Down. Kata kunci: Down syndrome, ortodonti, maloklusi Correspondence: Sianiwati Goenharto, c/o: Departemen Ortodonsia, Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Airlangga. Jl. Mayjend. Prof. Dr. Moestopo No. 47 Surabaya 60132, Indonesia. E-mail: sianiwati.goenharto@yahoo.id Literature Review introduction Down syndrome is the most common clinically recognizable syndrome characterized by generalized physical and mental deficiencies. It was firstly reported in 1866 by John L. Down and the prevalence is variative, in between 1 in 7501 and 1 in 1250 live births.2 Statistic in United States showed an increasing prevalence, currently observed at 11.8 per 10,000 births.3 The prevalence increases with the age of the mother.4 In Indonesia, �Goenharto.: Orthodontic treatment considerations in Down syndrome patients nowadays there are approximately 300,000 people with Down syndrome, whereas in Jawa Timur every year there are 689 Down syndrome patients. In 1959 LeJeune, Gautier dan Turpin found the association between Down syndrome and chromosome 21.5 Normal person has 46 chromosomes, but 95% Down syndrome patients have extra chromosome #21. Nondisjunction problem makes total chromosome become 47; therefore it is also known as trisomy #21.6-8 There is a typical mongoloid appearance and virtually all patients have learning disabilities.7 Forty percents of Down syndrome patients can be accompanied with congenital heart problem such as mitral valve prolapse (MVP). Other medical conditions are upper respiratory tract infections, hepatitis, leukemia and even that 100% of person with Down syndrome over 35 years old develop neurological signs of Alzheimer disorder. Besides, there are still problem of speech and hearing, eye problem, and epilepsy.4 The prevalence and the variety of malocclusion on Down syndrome patients have already been studied. Study on 112 subjects with Down syndrome was found 92% of the subjects had malocclusion. Class III malocclusion was most frequently observed (43.8%). Crowding and unilateral cross bite were found in 15% of the subjects respectively. Bilateral cross bite was present in 5.4% of the subjects.9 Study on 57 children with Down syndrome in Mexico also found that the prevalence of anterior open bite was 31.6%.10 Down syndrome patients are like other normal children, who need orthodontic treatment. Parents of Down syndrome children in France often have difficulties to access oral health care and the patients are less likely to receive dental services.11 On the other hand, Down syndrome is categorized to a person with disabilities, so they need special management. Down syndrome often accompanied with systemic problem besides the malocclusion itself which require special attention. The systemic disease can influence the orthodontic treatment, but the orthodontic treatment can worsen the general condition. Another problem is the mental retard condition and behavior disorder that can disturb the communication between the patient and dentist. Motivation to treatment usually not come from the patient but from the parents, so support from the surrounding people should be always provided. Because of that, several considerations must be taken during the treatment so the goal can be achieved. The purpose of this literature study was to describe the problems of orthodontic treatment for Down syndrome patients and several considerations that should be taken to overcome the problem, so treatment result can be obtained and the patient can get a better life. dental problem on down syndrome patients Generally, Down syndrome patients have several dental problems. It is important how they can get good oral hygiene. Study about the oral health condition of individuals with Down syndrome in Nigeria showed that the subjects had poorer oral hygiene, with no significant sex difference. This condition need frequent oral health assessment and routine treatment is expected to be done.12 Study of dental treatment needs of 300 children (aged 9–13 years) with disabilities in Melbourne found that 41 % of them required simple treatment; including caries treatment, periodontal therapy and oral health promotion.13 Dental anomaly is often found in Down syndrome patient. The incidence is about 73%. Congenital missing teeth is about 10x times more common in individuals with Down syndrome than in general population.14,15 with a higher frequency in males than in females. Agenesis occurred more frequently in mandible than in maxilla and most oftenly on the left side. The main components in the pattern of agenesis observed in Down syndrome are supposed to be related to the peripheral nervous system and abnormal cartilagenous tissue.15 Research through longitudinal panoramic radiograph in Canada showed that hypodontia was found in 92% of samples when third molars were considered and in 56% when third molars were not considered. The most frequently agenetic teeth were maxillary and mandibular third molars, maxillary lateral incisors, mandibular second premolars, mandibular incisors, maxillary second premolars, and maxillary second molars. Hypodontia was more prevalent and severe in females.3 Another study in Netherland found 59.6% of 114 Down syndrome patients had missing teeth. Absence of both mandibular central incisors was a high predictor for oligodontia. Congenital heart disease and hypothyroidism are parameters involved in tooth agenesis.16 The incidence of canine impaction is ten times higher than normal individual.17 Delayed eruption of teeth is often occured, with an abnormal sequence. Primary teeth may not appear until the age of two, with complete dentition delayed until age 4 or 5. Some primary teeth are then retained in some children until they are 14 or 15.6 Abnormality in tooth formation such as microdontia (35-55%) is also seen in people with Down syndrome. Crowns tend to be smaller, and roots are often small and conical, which can lead to tooth loss from periodontal disease. Severe illness or prolonged fevers can lead to hypoplasia and hypocalcification.6,18 Taurodontism is also found in Down syndrome patients with the prevalence of 0,54–5,6%.19 It is characterized by a large pulp chamber and it is most commonly seen in molars.20 Malocclusion on down syndrome patients Compare with general population, malocclusion in Down syndrome patients is more frequent, more severe and more skeletally based which can adversely affect functions.21 Malocclusion is often found in Down syndrome patients particularly because of delayed eruption of permanent teeth and underdevelopment of maxillary arch, leading to poor positioning of teeth.6 Study on 136 Chilean children with Down syndrome, showed a higher frequency � Dent. J. (Maj. Ked. Gigi), Vol. 45. No. 1 March 2012: 6–11 of malalignments in both the deciduous and permanent dentitions. The frequency was higher in the permanent teeth than in deciduous dentition. Higher frequency of malalignment was found in the upper central incisor, lateral incisor, and canine regions.22 The maxilla of Down syndrome patients showed hypoplasia in the vertical plane and the sagittal plane. Sagittal maxillary growth is relatively constant from the age of 8 to 18 years, with an average increase of 0.12 mm/year measured at the level of point A. In the vertical plane it grows at an average rate of 0.62 mm/year and 0.70 mm/year, measured at the level of the anterior nasal spine and posterior nasal spine respectively.2 Down syndrome may affect the size and shape of the palate. Palatal length, width, and height were significantly influenced.23 The palate of Down syndrome patients may appear highly vaulted and narrow, due to the unusual thickness of the sides of the hard palate. This thickness restricts the amount of space the tongue can occupy in the mouth and affects the ability to speak and chew.18 This V shaped palate is caused by deficient development of the midface, and it affects the length, height, and depth of the palate, but rarely affects the width.6 Cephalometric measurement held in Canada showed the reduced dimension height of maxilla and mandible, short teeth, maxilla and mandible, forward rotation of maxillary and mandibular plane that lead to deep bite and mandibular prognatism.3 The characteristic of muscle hypotonia is found on perioral muscles, lip and chewing muscles and a protruding tounge, followed by active tounge protrusion or tounge thrush.24 A small oral cavity with a relatively large and fissured tongue leads to mouth breathing, which is a common cause of chronic periodontitis, xerostomia,18 drolling, angular cheilitis and halitosis.6 The prevalence of malocclusion on Down syndrome patients is quite high. Meštrović et al.,9 found 92% children with Down syndrome had malocclusion, whereas study on 112 Down syndrome patients in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil showed a prevalence of malocclusion was 74%; cause by vertical and transversal occlusal alteration. Age, nail or finger biting habit, mouth posture, and cold or sore throat were the variables associated with the peavalence of malocclusion in these subjects.25 Maxillary anteroposterior hypoplasia makes 54% of Down syndrome patients have Angle class III tendencies.17 Craniofacial dysplasia that has already occured at birth, become more severe with increasing age. An anterior open bite and class III malocclusion may be due to proclination of the incisor, under-development of the maxilla and a more anterior position of the hypoplastic mandible.26 Posterior crossbite occurred in 65% of patients due to maxillary transverse hypoplasia. A smaller maxilla also contributes to an open bite, poor positioning of the teeth and increases periodontal disease and dental caries. This finding is accordingly with study of Meštrović et al.,9 who found class III malocclusion, crowding and anterior or posterior cross bite. Systemic and mental problems in down syndrome patients About 40-50 % of the children with Down syndrome are born with a congenital heart disease, but most of them had received surgical correction within the first few years of life. The decrease in number of T cells can affects the immune system and contributes to a higher rate of infections and makes greater incidence of periodontal diseases, stomatitis, oral candida infection and gingivitis.19 History of the patients should be examined thoroughly. Patients can be asked to fill the questionnaire about their general health, because Down syndrome is often related to other health problems such as epilepsy, diabetes, leukemia, hypotiroidism,19 and also seven times higher as hepatitis virus carrier.6 Down syndrome patients have variation in intelligence condition. There are some patients with an IQ above 69, but the most typical is moderate or severe retardation (IQ 20-50).4 In early infancy they are in the range of low typical development, IQ decreases in the first decade of life and in adolescent years cognitive function reaches a plateau that continues into adulthood. Children with Down syndrome have more behavioral and psychiatric problems than other children. There are 17.6% of individuals with Down syndrome aged less than 20 years have a psychiatric disorder, most frequently a disruptive behavior such as hyperactivity disorder, oppositional disorder or aggressive behavior. Firstly, the parents are disappointed when they found their newborn is diagnosed with Down syndrome. However, within a few months, they become attached, because child with Down syndrome is happier and more loveable.5 Other problems are speech and language difficulties that affect communication, although research showed that there in no association existed between speech disorders and anterior open bite in Down syndrome Mexican children.10 There is individual variation in the delay of language acquisition in children with Down syndrome. Patients have great difficulty in communicating with people who do not know them well and their ability to develop the relationship with society is limited. Parents, patient’s family or caregiver will be able to help reaching better communication with the patients. It is important that the dentist communicate directly with the patient in order to build a level of trust to improve their confidence. Maybe it will need more time for explaining the orthodontic procedure, but if Down syndrome patients has already willing to be treated and trust the operator, they can be cooperative.19 discussion A child with Down syndrome is a handicapped child with disabilities and special needs. Actually there should be a high orthodontic treatment need for Down syndrome patients because of an increased prevalence and severity of malocclusion.21 Nevertheless, orthodontic services for �Goenharto.: Orthodontic treatment considerations in Down syndrome patients the handicapped have generally been neglected,27 although handicapped children including Down syndrome patients are able and willing to undergo orthodontic treatment.28 Orthodontic treatment held in special need child is different with normal child; especially if the child has systemic disorder and mental problems. The treatment procedures need to be simplified, so it will be possible to be done. Treatment objective for Down syndrome patients should be the same as that of normal patients, although the treatment plan may need to be adapted to each individual’s condition.29 It is often found that the parents have highly motivated to seek the orthodontic treatment for their children, because they want the best for their children i.e. better appearance, better oral hyhiene to gain better quality of life. Motivation from the patiens themselves is often not clear. It must be realized that there is still possibility of treatment failure due to patient’s limitation. In this condition, maybe the objective must be changed from ideal condition to compromise, only to achieve esthetic improvement in order the child can be easily accepted in social community.30 Another treatment objective is to overcome the narrow palate which can influence the general health. It is reported that there was positive improvement on oral motoric and articulation function31 and also there was significant orofacial function increase after treatment with palatal plate.32 To several persons, orthodontic treatment will be beneficial, but to another persons may be not. Nevertheless, Down syndrome is not always a contra indication to orthodontic treatment. Orthodontic treatment still can be done in selected patients. If it has been decided to do orthodontic treatment, attention must not directed towards the malocclusion itself, but several considerations and good care should be taken particularly if accociated with systemic, mental and behavior condition of the patients. During orthodontic treatment there may be systemic condition that affects the oral environment. Child’s health history and clinical descripsion should be well recorded and remembered to acknowledge the sensitivity of the patients. About half of the children with Down syndrome are born with a congenital cardiac anomaly.14 Orthodontist should be aware about the sign and symptom manifestation in oral cavity that probably associated with specific disease. Sometimes multidiciplinary approach is necessary to prevent bacterial endocarditis. There are always some possibilities of infections such as upper respiratory tract infections, hepatitis, epilepsy, leukemia, and other conditions, so medical consultation with the internist and pediatrist should always be done. Premedication like antibiotic prophylaxis, vitamin and improved immune response are needed to be done. Mental condition of the patients may be the most important factor that influences orthodontic treatment procedures. Parent’s agreement may be advantageous to support their psychological condition. Parent’s ability to collaborate with the orthodontist is usually helpful for successful completion of treatment.28 It is important to always remember the wise advice that: “A person with a disability is still just a person who deserves to be treated with dignity and respect. We should never assume someone doesn’t understand what we are saying because they don’t speak as well as we do”.17 Based on that advice, better communication with the patients should be achieved. The hearing loss experienced by many of these individuals should be taken into consideration when communicating with the patient. Good doctor-patient relationship will increase the confidence level of the patients to overthrough the difficult time during orthodontic treatment. Behaviour disorder is often a problematic in treating Down syndrome patients because of lack of understanding, increased apprehension, short attention, and limited tolerance.21 Communication to the patients with Down syndrome who usually has intelegency below average should be always developed, so good doctor-patient relation can be achieved. To overcome the communication problem, every phase shoud be done slowly, in order not to shock the patients. Every step that will be done should be explained clearly with tell-show-do technique, so the children brave enough to experience the treatment. In every step, operator should always think about the comfort of the patients. Maybe they require more chairside time and there will be an increased number of appointments. Orthodontic treatment can be done if the patient is cooperative. This behavior is needed because orthodontic treatment is multivisit and need a long periods. The patients should keep their appointment to control, keep their oral hygiene well, and avoid hard and sticky child.28 Patient’s ability to keep their oral hygiene is required to gain good treatment result. It is advised to take frequent drink or oral rinse to minimize the dry mouth sensation. Caries frequency in Down syndrome patients can be minimized with preventive measures such as fluoride topical application, fissure sealant, fluoride tooth paste suggestion and non cariogenic food and beverage consumption. Parents and caregivers play an important role in keeping good oral hygiene, maintaining the diet and consumption pattern, and going to the dental office to get routine treatment.6 Failure in keeping oral hygiene can increase the possibility of gingival hyperplasia, periodontal disease, and bacterial endocarditis risk. Orthodontic treatment is started with impression and radiographic taking. The first problem is how to get the study models. Down syndrome patients often have strong gag reflex due to tounge condition (macroglossia) and anciety or phobia. This condition usually can be overcome with simple explanation and good communication.21 Impression must be taken as quick as possible, with fast set type or low viscosity impression material. This kind of material needs skillful and fast working operator. Failure in the first impression may increase the difficulty to get the second impression and so on. If it is not possible, impression can be taken under conscious sedation, intravenous sedation or even with general anesthesia. �0 Dent. J. (Maj. Ked. Gigi), Vol. 45. No. 1 March 2012: 6–11 Panoramic radiograph is considered to be useful for orthodontic assessment. However, it requires patient’s cooperation, the patients stay still minimally during the rotation of the tube of the panoramic radiographic machine. Down syndrome patients often have difficulty to stay still because of uncontrolled head and limb movements. Problems will also arise if frightened child shoud be restricted in a cephalostat since it will increase their fear and even generate panic. Periapical photo maybe more difficult to obtain since the film must be held intra orally during the x-ray exposure and this procedure may be uncomfortable and increase the anciety of the patients. In certain cases, computed tomography (CT) scan can be performed under sedation.21 Generally, orthodontic appliance is bulky, uncomfortable and painful. On the other hand, the appliance needs day-to- day maintenance.28 These conditions will make the patients reluctant wearing the appliance. The treatment should be planned in a simple way, not in a hurry to reach the goal, slowly but sure to get the improvement. It was reported that orthodontic treatment problems with fixed appliances were more difficult than with removable appliances. Treatment period with fixed appliance was harder on 47% patients, compared with 11.8% removable appliance users.28 The problems of wearing removable orthodontic appliances are mastication and speech difficulties. It is beneficial that adjustment of removable orthodontic appliances can be done extra orally. Furthermore, oral health maintaining is better with removable orthodontic appliances. Successful orthodontic treatment with removable orthodontic appliances has already reported by Becker and Shapira.33 In severe malocclusion cases, combination treatment with fixed appliance may be needed. From the doctor’s point of view, orthodontic treatment with fixed appliance is hard to be done. The patients should sit in dental chair for a long enough periods of time and the teeth must be dry during bracket placement. Sedation or general anesthesia will make the procedures easier to be done, as started by Jackson in 1967.30 The problem is that the equipments for sedation are rarely provided in dental private practice. It should be done in a clinic or more sophisticated hospital. It will be easier if bracket placement is done indirectly, since it can be accurate and the process will be less time consuming. Thus, the most time consuming step shoud be done out of the mouth including steps in dental laboratory. Light forces should be given to move the teeth. It’s not advisable to give heavier forces, since it will make the patient more uncomfortable. Straight wire technique can be chosen because it has minimal wire changes. Treatment with self ligating bracket is also beneficial since it can reduce the visiting time and no ligature wire or elastomeric modules make teeth brushing easier to be done. Maintaining oral hygiene is more difficult with fixed than with removable orthodontic appliances. Because of that reason, it is recommended for Down syndrome patients to wear removable orthodontic appliance rather than fixed appliances. Fixed appliances should be worn only in limited period. Besides of that, bonding procedure must be done correctly so it is not easily debond. Replacement of bracket will difficult and need more time.21 Activation, wire changing, and other procedures can give unpleasant sensation because of many instruments used inside the mouth. Fixed appliance is the only choice of treatment for non cooperative Down syndrome patients, since the patients are unable to remove the appliance by their own efforts. Nevertheless, the immature condition can make the patients do something that damage the appliance, so it can not work properly and even hurt the oral mucosa. After active treatment has finished, retention period is needed in order to maintain the treatment result. In children with skeletal discrepancies, or with large tongue, non elimited bad habits, treatment result can not be maintained and tends to relapse. To achieve long period of stability, removable retainer can be used, but it depends on the willingness of the patient to wear it. Retainer such as Hawley retainer, wraparound, or clear retainer can be used.34,35 If the cooperation is doubtful, it is better to use permanent retainer such as bonded lingual retainer. In cases with hypodontia, if there are still residual spaces after the treatment is completed, prosthodontic approach is needed for planning the suitable denture. Succsessful orthodontic treatment is not only increase the estethic factor but also improve the other function including swallowing, speech and mastication. Failures can occur because of unpredicted condition such as: the patients become ill, uncontrolled behavior and inadequate oral hygiene.21 It is recommended to remove the appliance in these conditions, although the treatment result has not achieved yet in order to prevent further negative effects. It is concluded that orthodontic treatment still can be done on selective Down syndrome patients, although some difficulties may occur. Medical, mental and behavior condition besides the malocclusion itself will affect the treatment result. Several considerations, skillful orthodontist and chairside, specific effort and facilities such as sedation equipment and well trained operator are needed to gain the treatment objectives. references 1. Kliegman RM, Behrman RE, Jenson HB, Stanton BF. Nelson textbook of pediatrics. 18th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2007. p. 507–9. 2. Alió J, Lorenzo J, Iglesias MC, Manso FJ, Ramírez EM. Longitudinal maxillary growth in Down syndrome patients. Angle Orthod 2011; 81(2): 253–9. 3. Suri S, Tompson BD, Atenafu E. Prevalence and patterns of permanent tooth agenesis in Down syndrome and their association with craniofacial morphology. Angle Orthod 2011; 81(2): 260–9. 4. Southern Association of Institutional Dentist (SAID). Down syndrome: A review for dental professionals. Self-study course. Module 3. Available from: http://www.saiddent.org/modules/ 11module3.pdf. Accessed July 12, 2011. ��Goenharto.: Orthodontic treatment considerations in Down syndrome patients 5. Roizen NJ, Patterson D. Down’s syndrome. The Lancet 2003; 361: 1281–9. 6. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR). Practical oral care for people with Down syndrome. Available from: http://www.nichd.nih.gov NICHDInformationResourceCenter@ mail.nih.gov. Accessed August 15, 2011. 7. Scully C, Welbury R, Flaitz C, de Almeida OP. A color atlas of orofacial health and disease in children and adolescents. 2nd ed. St Louis: Martin Dunitz; 2002. p. 214. 8. Cawson RA, Odell EW. Cawson’s essentials of oral pathology and oral medicine. 7th ed. Edinburg: Churchill Livingstone; 2008. p. 419–21. 9. Me≥trovi S, Mik≥i M, ≠tefana -Papi J, Stipetic J. Prevalence of malocclusion in patients with Down’s Syndrome. Acta Stomatologica Croatica 2002; 36(2): 239–41. 10. Lopez-Perez R, Borges-Yanez A, Lopez-Morales M, anterior open bite and speech disorders in children with Down syndrome. Angle Orthod 2008; 78(2): 221–7. 11. Allison PJ, Hennequin M, Faulks D. Dental care access among individuals with Down syndrome in France. Special Care in Dentistry 2000; 20(1): 28–34. 12. Oredugba FA. Oral health condition and treatment needs of a group of Nigerian individuals with Down syndrome. Down Syndrome Research and Practice 2007; 12(1): 72–6. 13. Desai M, Messer LB, Calache H. A study of the dental treatment needs of children with the abilities in Melbourne, Australia. Aust Dent J 2001; 46(1): 41–50. 14. Norderyd J, Kling-Karlberg M. Orthodontic treatment strategies in five patients with Down syndrome, congenital heart defect, and oligodontia. Available from: www.lj.se/index.jsf?childId=4748&no deId=25819&nodeType. 15. Russell BG, Kjær I. Tooth agenesis in Down syndrome. Arch Oral Biol 1993; 38(1): 85–9. 16. Reuland-Bosma W, Reuland MC, Bronkhorst E, Phoa KH. Patterns of tooth agenesis in patients with Down syndrome in relation to hypothyroidism and congenital heart disease: an aid for treatment planning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137(5): 584–9. 17. Musich DR. Orthodontic intervention and patients with Down syndrome: The role of inclusion, technology, and leadership. Angle Orthod 2006; 76: 734–5. 18. Desai SS, Flanagan TJ. Orthodontic considerations in individuals with Down Syndrome: A case report. Angle Orthod 1999; 69(1): 85–8. 19. Pilcher ES. Dental care for the patient with Down syndrome. Down Syndrome Research and Practice 1998; 5(3): 111–6. 20. Nawa H, Oberoi S, Vargervik K. Taurodontism and Van der Woude syndrome. Is there an association?. Angle Orthod 2008; 78(5): 832–7. 21. Becker A, Chaushu S, Shapira J. Orthodontic treatment for the special needs child. Semin Orthod 2004; 10: 281–92. 22. Ondarza A, Jara L, Bertonati MI, Blanco R. Tooth malalignments in chilean children with Down syndrome. J Periodontol 1993; 55(4): 466–71. 23. Dellavia C, Sforza C, Orlando F, Ottolina P, Pregliasco F, Ferrario VF. Three-dimensional hard tissue palatal size and shape in Down syndrome subjects. Eur J Orthod 2007; 29(4): 417–22. 24. Limbrock GJ, Fisher-Brandies H, Avalle C. Castillo-Morales orofacial therapy: Treatment of 67 children with Down syndrome. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 1991; 33(4): 296– 303. 25. Oliveira ACB, Paiva SM, Campos MR, Czeresnia D. Factors associated with malocclusions in children and adolescents with Down syndrome. Am J Orthop Dentofac Orthop 2008; 133(4): 489. 26. Fisher-Brandies H, Cephalometric comparison between children with and without Down’s syndrome. Eur J Orthod 1988; 10 (1): 255–63. 27. Rao DB, Hegde AM, Munshi AK. Malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need of handicapped individual in South Canara, India. International Dental Journal 2003; 53: 13–8. 28. Becker A, Shapira J, Chaushu S. Orthodontic treatment for disabled children-A survey of patient and appliance management. J Orthod 2001; 28: 39–44. 29. Khan R, Abdallah AI, Antony VV. Down syndrome: A case report. The Orthodontic Cyber Journal 2009 January. 30. Chadwick SM, Asher-McDade C. The orthodontic management of patients with profound learning disability. Br J Orthod 1997; 24: 117–25. 31. Backman B, Grever-Sjolander AC, Holm AK, Johansson I. Children with Down syndrome: Oral development and morphology after use of palatal plates between 6 and 18 months. Int J Paediatr Dent 2003; 13(5): 327–35. 32. Carlstedt K, Henningsson G, Dahllof G. A four-year longitudinal study of palatal plate therapy in children with Down syndrome: Effects on oral motor function, articulation and communication preferences Acta Odontol Scand 2003; 61(1): 39–46. 33. Becker A, Shapira J. Orthodontics for handicapped child. Eur J Orthod 1996; 18: 55–67. 34. Yanez EER, White L, Araujo RC, Galuffo AMG, Yanez SER. 1001 tips for orthodontics and its secrets. Miami: Amolca; 2007. p. 312–51. 35. Staley RN, Reske NT. Essentials of orthodontics diagnosis and treatment. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011. p. 239–52.