�� Vol. 43. No. 1 March 2010 Special considerations for orthodontic treatment in patients with root resorption haru S. anggani Department of Orthodontic Faculty of Dentistry, University of Indonesia Jakarta - Indonesia abstract Background: Ort��d�ntic treat�ent needs g��d c�nsiderati�n es�ecially ���en t�ere are �n�av�ra�le c�nditi�ns ��r �rt��d�ntic treat�ent, s�c� as �eri�d�ntal diseases �r t��t� ��it� r��t res�r�ti�n. R��t res�r�ti�n s���ld n�t �ec��e ���rse d�e t� �rt��d�ntic treat�ent., All risk �act�rs s���ld �e eli�inated �e��re �rt��d�ntic treat�ent is started. Ot�er��ise, t�e g�al �� �rt��d�ntic treat�ent c��ld �e di��ic�lt t� ac�ieve �eca�se �� ���r dental and �r �ral �ealt�. Purpose: ��e ��r��se �� t�is st�dy ��as t� learn ��re a���t �ec�anical �act�rs t�at c��ld ���rsen t�e r��t res�r�ti�n t�at �as already �een t�ere �r even �r�v�ke r��t res�r�ti�n t� devel�� d�ring �rt��d�ntic treat�ent. reviews: Res�r�ti�n �� dental r��t s�r�ace is t�e c�nditi�n in ���ic� ce�ent�� is de�raved and t�e da�age c��ld als� incl�de dentin �� dental r��t. �t can �cc�r eit�er ��ysi�l�gically �r �at��l�gically d�e t� s��e ca�ses. ��e �cc�rrence �� t�e r��t res�r�ti�n is s�s�ected �eca�se �� t�e �i�l�gical �act�r, t�e t��t� c�nditi�n, t�e s����rtive tiss�e and t�e �ec�anical �act�rs. Pan�ra�ic �-ray ���ic� r��tinely �sed t� s����rt diagn�se in �rt��d�ntic cases, can detect r��t res�r�ti�n in general, alt���g� s��eti�es �eria�ical �-ray ��it� �arallel tec�niq�e is needed t� en�ance t�e diagn�sis. Be��re starting a treat�ent, t�e risk �act�rs t�at s�s�ected as t�e ca�ses �� r��t res�r�ti�n s���ld �e eli�inated, t��s t�e �ec�anical treat�ent can �e calc�lated. Conclusion: Ort��d�ntic treat�ent in �atient ��it� r��t res�r�ti�n s���ld n�t escalate t�e r��t res�r�ti�n ���ic� already �cc�rs. ��e treat�ent s���ld �e d�ne e��ectively �y �sing ��ti�al ��rces. Giving disc�ntin�ed ��rces and av�iding intr�si�n and t�rq�e ��ve�ents c��ld red�ce t�e risk �act�rs �� r��t res�r�ti�n. Key words: R��t res�r�ti�n, �rt��d�ntic treat�ent abstrak latar belakang: Keadaan gigi dan jaringan �end�k�ng yang k�rang �eng�nt�ngkan �agi �era��atan �rt�d�ntik �endaknya �e���t��kan �er�atian ekstra �ara klinisi. K�ndisi terse��t �isalnya adanya �enyakit �eri�d�ntal ata���n adanya gigi dengan res�r�si akar. Pera��atan �rt�d�ntik yang dilak�kan �endaknya tidak �ena��a� �ara� res�r�si akar yang tela� ada se�el��nya. Se�el�� �e��lai �era��atan, sel�r�� �akt�r yang did�ga se�agai �akt�r resik� di�ilangkan terle�i� da��l�. Se�aliknya, t�j�an �era��atan �rt�d�ntik akan s�lit dica�ai aki�at ��r�knya keadaan gigi dan jaringan �end�k�ngnya. tujuan: �e��elajari le�i� ja�� �engenai �akt�r �ekanik yang da�at �enye�a�kan res�r�si akar ata� �a�kan �e��er�ara� terjadinya res�r�si akar yang tela� ada aki�at �era��atan �rt�d�ntik. tinjauan pustaka: Res�r�si �er��kaan akar gigi adala� k�ndisi r�saknya jaringan se�ent�� akar gigi yang da�at �erlanj�t �ingga ke jaringan dentin akar gigi. Res�r�si akar da�at terjadi secara �isi�l�gis ata� �at�l�gis. �erjadinya res�r�si akar ini did�ga karena adanya �akt�r �i�l�gis, k�ndisi gigi dan jaringan �end�k�ng serta adanya �akt�r �ekanik. F�t� r�nsen �an�ra�ik yang r�tin dig�nakan se�agai �en�njang diagn�sa �ada �era��atan �rt�d�ntik da�at �endeteksi secara ���� adanya res�r�si akar, �eski��n terkadang di��t��kan ��t� r�nsen �eria�ikal teknik �aralel �nt�k �e��erjelasnya. Se�el�� �e��lai �era��atan, �akt�r resik� yang did�ga se�agai �enye�a� terjadinya res�r�si akar �endaknya di�ilangkan le�i� da��l�, �ar� ke��dian �e��erti��angkan �i��ekanika �era��atan �rt�d�ntik. Kesimpulan: Pera��atan �rt�d�ntik �ada �asien dengan res�r�si akar �endaknya tidak �e��er�ara� res�r�si akar yang tela� ada. Pera��atan yang dilak�kan �ar�sla� see�ekti� dan see�isien ��ngkin Review Article �� Dent. J. (Maj. Ked. Gigi), Vol. 43. No. 1 March 2010: 35-39 dengan �engg�nakan gaya yang ��ti�al. Selain it� �e��erian gaya secara disk�ntiny� dan �eng�indari �e��erian gaya intr�si dan t�rq�ing da�at �eng�rangi terjadinya res�r�si akar gigi. Kata kunci: Res�r�si akar gigi, �era��atan �rt�d�ntik C�rres��ndence: Haru S. Anggani, c/o: Bagian Ortodonsia, Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Indonesia. Jl. Salemba Raya no. 4 Jakarta, Indonesia. E-mail: haruanggani@yahoo.com occurs as the result of biological, dental, periodontal, and mechanical factors.9,10 Age is one of biological factors that are considered playing role in the occurrence of dental root resorption. This issue has been studied a lot by many researchers, but the results differs from each other.10–14 Besides age, sex is also considered as risk factor in occurrence of dental root resorption, but it is still a controversial issue.9,11,14 The other biological risk factor suspected having relationship with dental root resoprtion is genetic. In 1997, Harris et al.9 found that genetic has a susceptibility relation with root resorption in 103 pair of siblings whom were treated with the same technique with one orthodontist. Although the pattern of hereditary remains unclear. Al Qawasmi et al.15 found that low production of IL-1b cytokines inflammatory protein is considered to play role with dental root resoprtion. Systemic condition is also presumed having a relationship with dental root resoption.16 Systemic condition is also presumed having a relationship with dental root resorption.16 Whereas, the local factor considered having relationship with dental root resorption is the unfavorable periodontium, such as the condition of traumatic occlusion, parafunctions, and bad habit including tongue thrusting and nail biting.1,17,18 In those condition, periodontium receives continuous excessive loading, which lead to the damage of cementum and the exposure of underlying dentin.1 Another local factor that is the adjacent impacted tooth. Rimes et al.19 studied about resorption of incisive caused by impacted canine and the result showed that the resorption has tendency to occur extensively, reaches the two third of apical and causes symptoms to patients.20 The form of apical portion could also play role in the occurrence of dental root resorption. Lavender and Malmgren cit. Nigul and Jomagi14 divided the form of dental root into 5 categories which are: normal, short, dilacerated, pipette like, and blunt. Similarly, Mirabella and Artun22 classified the form of apical portion into 6 types that are: normal, blunt, eroded, pointed, curved, and cork like. Tooth with more root length is more susceptible to resorption because it needs more force to be moved and the movement of the root is also greater during tipping and torque movements. Beside, traumatic tooth is suspected having greater risk to root resorption compared to non-traumatic tooth.8,23 Meanwhile, a vital tooth has greater risk to root resorption compared to a non-vital tooth that has undergone endodontic treatment.22,24. Reitan cit. Graber1 stated that an endodontically treated tooth has harder dentin compared to a vital tooth. It may explain why an endodontically introduction The goals of orthodontic treatment are to achieve harmonic relations among teeth and jaws, and to attain good esthetic without neglecting healthy condition of periodontium.1 It could be achieved only if the patient has healthy general condition, dental, and periodontium. However, some patients come with unfavorable conditions for orthodontic treatment. For example, there is a periodontal disease or a tooth with root resorption.2,3 Dental root resorption can occur either physiologically or pathologically.4 It should be considered by practitioners in order not to escalate the root resorption that already occurs before an orthodontic treatment begins.5 If a patient with root resorption look for orthodontic treament, the treatment should be done without increasing the root resorption. Ideally, practitioner could detect it before starting the orthodontic treament and eliminate the risk factors that can be suspected to promote root resorption. Beside that, the mechanotherapy should be considered to prevent the worsening of root resorption that already occurs. Since a practitioner must take all known measures to prevent the root resorption before orthodontic treatment starts, the purpose of this study was to learn more about mechanic factors that could worsen the root resorption that has already been there or even provocating root resorption to develop during orthodontic treatment. the types of root resorption Resorption of dental root surface is the condition in which cementum is depraved and the damage could also include dentin of dental root. It can occur due to osteoclast and cementoclast activities.6 Based on the degree of severity, dental root resorption could be classified into 3 types which are surface resorption, inflammatory resorption, and replacement resorption.7 Graber divided dental root resorption into superficial resorption of root surface and apical root resorption.1 Malmgren et al.8 divided root resorption into 4 types: irregular contour of dental root, apical resorption less than 2 mm, apical resorption 2 mm to a third of root length, and root resorption more than a third of previous root length. risk factors of dental root resorption Superficial resorption of root surface is caused presumptively by some factors. This type of resorption is developed by an imbalance between resistance capacity and repairing ability of periodontal tissues toward forces received by dental root and presumptively ��Anggani: Special considerations for orthodontic treatment treated tooth has less resorption. It also occurs in teeth with incomplete root formation because they have thick predentin layer.24,25 Another factor suspected to play role in surface root resorption is mechanical factor of orthodontic treatment. The consideration of the magnitude of forces, the methods of force applying, the duration and the direction of forces influence the occurrence of dental root resorption.1,6,10,26,27 Besides the magnitude of forces, the methods of force applying is one of the factors suspected to trigger dental root resorption. There are 3 known methods of force applying: continuing, interrupted or intermittent.26,28 A factor that is not less important is duration of orthodontic force. It is equivalent with the longevity of treatment.29,30,31 Another mechanical factor that can cause root resorption is the types of dental movement. It is stated that intrusion and torque are the most frequent movements causing dental root resorption.1,32,33 Pathophysiology of dental root resorption Dental cementum is an independent tissue; unlike bone, cementum does not involve in metabolic process such as calcium homeostatic. The process of resorption of dental root surface is developed by imbalance between resistance capacities and repairing ability of periodontal tissues toward forces applied to dental root surface.9 The process of root resorption is an elimination of hyalinization zone.1,7 Hyalinization is a process marked with the presence of cellular and vascular changes that cause degeneration to cells and vascular structures. If this condition persists, necrotic tissues and hyalinization zone will be formed. Hyalinization zone would be self- eliminated by body and at that time the resorption would occur.1,6,7,27,33 the detection of dental root resorption The detection of dental root resorption can be performed by some methods, some of them are through radiography, histology, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) or micro computed tomography (Micro-CT). Histological detection, SEM, or micro CT could only be done in extracted tooth.33,35 Lateral cephalogram and panoramic x-rays are routinely used prior to orthodontic treatment. However, sometimes additional radiographs are required, such as dental, periapical, occlusal photos, and other projections.10,11,26 Periapical radiograph gives more accurate details, less distortion and less error in superimposition compared to panoramic and lateral cephalogram. By periapical projection, pathologic condition in periapical tissue could be seen in more detail compared to panoramic projection.36,37 McNicol cit. Brezniak and Wasserstein12 stated that the most favorable radiograph technique in detecting root resorption is periapical with parallel technique. Geometrically, the result is accurate and it is the most preferable technique for observing root resorption, as shown in the picture below.36 discussion Some mechanical factors of orthodontic treatment are related to the increase of the risk of surface root resorption. So it is easy to understand that to perform orthodontic treatment at a patient with dental root resorption as special considerations are needed. Orthodontic treatment should be done without enhancing the severity of resorption. Before discussing about the management of root resorption, early detection is necessary to be completed first. Routine panoramic x-rays used as supporting diagnostic tool for orthodontic cases could show the appearance of existing root resorption, although additional periapical radiograph is necessary to be indicated.11,36,37 Orthodontic treatment could be performed without deteriorating the existing root resorption. It was stated that local risk factor should be eliminated first and afterward the magnitude, the direction, and the duration of force applied and mechanics used should also be considered.1,3,6,7 The magnitude of forces applied should be light. The light force can be achieved by reducing friction, space closing with non-sliding mechanic, or by adding anchorage teeth.23,26 Sliding mechanism produces kinetic friction which will produce higher orthodontic forces.38,39 A number of studies have observed the influencing factors toward frictional force. Some of them are the material of the bracket, the design of bracket slot, the material of wire, the sectional form of wire, the diameter of wire, and the ligation used.38,41 It was stated that stainless steel bracket has lower friction compared to ceramic bracket because the surface of the ceramic is coarser than of stainless steel. Moreover, the design with larger intra-bracket distance and self ligating bracket has lower friction.27,42,43 Besides bracket selection, another factor influences frictional force is orthodontic wire. It is stated that nickel titanium wire has coarser surface than stainless steel. However, the greatest friction is obtained from beta titanium wire.27 Round wire has lower friction than square form. Smaller wire has smaller fiction too. The friction produced could be reduced by ligating wire to bracket technique. Ligation using elastomer rubber gives higher friction compared to ligation using wire.38,39 Another effort to reduce friction can be seen from the method of space closing. The post extraction space closing process could be performed by sliding or non-sliding mechanics. According to Profitt,26 the non-sliding method gives lower friction compared to the sliding one. However, the development of brackets nowadays based on sliding mechanic movement. To minimize the friction, modification to bracket, wire or ligation methods are performed. The principle to produce light force can be achieved by adding anchorage to anchoring side so that the force applied to the tooth which is going to be moved is relatively low toward the anchoring teeth.27 �� Dent. J. (Maj. Ked. Gigi), Vol. 43. No. 1 March 2010: 35-39 Another consideration in orthodontic treatment of tooth with root resorption is the method of force application. Continuous force application is more susceptible for producing root resorption compared to intermittent method. In intermittent method, cementum tissue has an opportunity to do self repairing and to prevent the occurrence of more severe resorption. The cementum repair occurs after force application is stopped and starts from periphery area of resorption because of cementoblast migration.1 Acar et al.44 observed the effect between continue and discontinue techniques in force application toward root resorption and they stated that the discontinue force application has less resorption area compared to the continue method. The duration of force application is proportional with the longevity of orthodontic treatment performed. The presence of root resorption occurring in the beginning of the treatment indicates that the tooth has root resorption risk towards orthodontic treatment. The regular radiograph x-rays is necessary to monitor root resorption occurred.1 Orthodontic treatment in patient with existing dental root resorption should be done as efficiently as possible.29,30 Harry et al.29 stated that the duration of force application factor is more crucial than the magnitude of force applied. In their study, it was found that with applied force as big as 40–60 gram in the day of 14, it was started to show small area of root resorption; in the day of 35, bigger zone of resorption was seen; and so did in the day of 200. The result showed that the extent of root resorption goes bigger as duration of force increasing. Another thing that should be noticed in orthodontic treatment with dental root resorption is the types of tooth movement. It is reported that the movement conducts with avoiding intrusion in teeth with existing root resorption.2,3 Sometimes intrusion and torque movement cannot be avoided in treating certain cases. Graber et al.1 asserted that intrusion and torque can be performed with minimal force along with resting phases in the interval. Intrusion with light force would be more effective. One of the methods of intrusion is using intrusion arch. It gives intrusion effect to anterior teeth as well as extrusion effect to molar tube. The important mechanical factors in intrusion are the magnitude of forces, the constant force, the point of force applying and the molar tip back moment.27 Besides the consideration of the magnitude of force applied, the point of force application is another factor that is needed to be considered. If the force is applied to the center of resistance then pure intrusion force will be produced; but if the force is applied though bracket attaching to tooth, the moment of force will emerge. The usage of intrusion arch with chinch back in molar will avoid flaring in anterior teeth that is caused by the moment.27 According to the third law of Newton, the usage of intrusion arch has is a contributory effect to the third molar, that is tip back moment of molar. It could be advantageous in class II molar relation, but in class I molar relation, anticipation should be performed by adding anchorage in molar teeth.27 Although theoretically the force should be applied as light as possible, but practically it is difficult for clinician to measure the magnitude of force applied to teeth. Yet, in the market, the tool that is able to measure the magnitude of force is already available; it is known as stress and tension gauge. The tool has two ends with hook or fork like forms. On the body of the tool, there is a line scale which shows the magnitude of force. Stress and tension gauge is used by hooking one of its end to the orthodontic wire, or to other orthodontic appliances, followed by counting the number of lines seen on the tool. On the 16 oz gauze, there are 16 lines, each line represents 1 oz. The importance of prevention is avoiding deterioration of the existing root resorption. The point is that the magnitude of force applied should be as light as possible. It can be achieved by reducing friction which could be attempted by selecting the types of bracket, wire and closing technique, applying ligating method, and adding anchorage. It is important to remember that the intermittent method of force application is the safest one because it gives a chance for cementum tissue to do self repairing so that the duration of treatment can be controlled by scheduling dental visits in order to allow roots to rest. In addition, it is necessary to measure the magnitude of force and if it is possible to posses the tool used for measuring the magnitude of force that is already available in the market. It is concluded that panoramic x-ray which is routinely used to support diagnosis in orthodontic cases, can detect root resorption in general, although sometimes periapical x-ray with parallel technique is needed to enhance the diagnose. Besides the importance of early detection, for patient who already has root resorption as the result of local factor, the orthodontic treatment should eliminate the factor so it should not escalate the root resorption that already occurs. In this case, the force should be applied as light as possible and discontinuous force is recommended to give opportunity for cementum tissue to do self repairing and to prevent the occurrence of more severe resorption. The orthodontic treatment also should be performed as effective and as efficient as possible. Intrusion and torque forces give risk in root resorption caused by the great stress in apical part of a tooth. references 1. Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL, Vig KWL. Orthodontics. CurrentOrthodontics. Current principles and technique. 4th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Inc; 2005. p. 4, 209–11, 263–6. 2. Hisano M, Ohtsubo K, Chung CJ, Nasution F, Soma K. Vertical control by combining a monoblock appliance in adult class III over closure treatment. Angle Orthod 2006; 76(2): 226–35. 3. Kokich VG. Orthodontic and non-orthodontic root resorpion: Their impact in clinical dental practice. J Dent Educ 2008; 72(8): 895–902. 4. Harris EF, Robinson QC, Woods MA. An analysis of causes apical root resorption in patients not treated orthodontically. Quintessence Int 1993; 24: 417–28. ��Anggani: Special considerations for orthodontic treatment 5. Lupi JE, Handelman CS, Sadowsky C. Prevalence and severity of apical root resorption and alveolar bone loss in orthodontically treated adults. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996; 109(1): 28–37. 6. Bishara SE. Textbook of orthodontics. Philadelphia: Saunders Company; 2001. p. 463–75. 7. Brezniak N, Wasserstein A. Root resorption after orthodontic treatment: Part 2. Literature review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1993; 103(2): 138–46. 8. Malmgrem O, Goldson L, Hill C, Orwin A, Lundberg M. Root resorption after orthodontic treatment of traumatized teeth. Am J Orthod 1982; 82(6): 487–91. 9. Harris EF, Kineret SE, Tolley EA. A heritable component for externalA heritable component for external apical root resorption in patients treated orthodontically. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop1997; 111: 301–9. 10. Brezniak N, Wasserstein A. Root resorption after orthodontic treatment: Part II. Literature review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1993; 103(1): 62–6. 11. Sameshima GT, Sinclair PM. Predicting and preventing root resorption: Part I. diagnostic factors. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2001; 119(5): 505–10. 12. McFadden WM, Engstrom C, Engstrom H, Anholm JM. A study of the relationship between incisor intrusion and root shorthening. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1989; 96(5): 390–6. 13. Beck BW, Harris EF. Apical root resorption in orthodontically treated subjects: analysis of Edgewise and light wire mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994; 105(4): 305–61. 14. Nigul K, Jagomagi T. Factors related to apicalroot resorption of maxillary incisor in orthodontic patient. Baltic Dental and Maxillofacial Journal 2006; 8(3): 76–9. 15. Al-Qawasmi RA, Hartsfield JK Jr, Everett ET, Flury L, Liu L, Foroud TM, Macri JV, Roberts WE.Genetic predisposition to external apical root resorption. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2003; 123(3): 242–52. 16. Verna C, Dalstra M, Melsen B. Bone turnover rate in rats does not influence root resorption induced by orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 2003; 25: 359. 17. Harris EF, Butler ML. Patterns of incisor root resorption before and after orthodontic correction in cases with anterior openbite. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992; 101(2): 112–9. 18. Lee RY, Artun J, Alonzao TA. Are dental anomalies risk factors forAre dental anomalies risk factors for apical root resorption in orthodontic patients? Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1999; 116: 197–95. 19. Rimes JR, Mitchell CNT, Willmot DR. Maxillary incisor root resorption in relation to the ectopic canine: a review of 26 patients. Eur J Orthod 1997; 19(1): 79–84. 20. Saldarriaga JR, Patino MC. Ectopic eruption and severe root resorption. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2003; 123(3): 259–65. 21. Heimisdottir K, Bosshardt D, Ruf S. Can the severity of root resorption be accurately judged by means of radiograph? A case report with histology. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2005; 128(1): 106–9. 22. Mirabella AD, Artun J. Risk factors for apical root resorption of maxillary anterior teeth in adult orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995; 108(3): 48–55. 23. Linge L, Linge BO. Patient characteristics and treatment variables associated with apical root resorption during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1991; 99(1): 35–43. 24. Spurrier SW, Hall SH, Joondeph DR, Shapiro PA, Riedel RA. A comparison of apical root resorption during orthodontic treatment in endodontically treated and vital teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990; 97(2): 130–4. 25. Hendrix I. Carels C, Kuijpers-Jagtman A, Van’t Hof M. A radiographics study of posterior apical root resorption in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop1994; 105: 345–9. 26. Proffitt. WR. Contemporary orthodontic. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: CV Mosby Company; 1999. p. 296–315, 345–7. 27. Nanda R. Biomechanics and esthetic strategies in clinical orthodontics. Missouri: Elsevier Inc; 2005. p. 135, 28–9, 140–3, 199–208. 28. Singh. Text book of orthodontics. New Delhi: JBM Publisher; 2004. p. 208–9. 29. Harry MR, Sims MR. Root resorption in bicuspid intrusion. A scanning electron microscope study. Angle Orthod 1982; 52: 235–58. 30. Kurol J,Owman-Moll P, Lundgren D. Time Related root resorption after application of a controlled continuous orthodontic force. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996; 110: 303–10. 31. Smale I, Artun J, Behbehani F, Doppel D, Van Hof M, Kuijpers- Jagtman A. Apical root resorption 6 months after initiation of fixed orthodontic appliance therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2005; 128: 57–67. 32. Costopoulos G, Nanda R. An evaluation of root resorption incidet to orthodontic intrusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996; 109: 543–8. 33. Chan E, Darendiler MA. Physical properties of root cementum: part 7. Extent of root resorption under areas of compresion and tension. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2006; 129: 504–10. 34. Jimenez-Pellegrin C, Arana-Chavez VE. Root resorption in human mandibular first premolars after rotation as detected by scanning electron microscopy. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2004; 126: 178–85 35. Wierzbicki T, El-Bialy T, Aldaghreer S, Li G, Doschak M. Analysis of orthodontically induced root resorption using micro-computed tomography (micro-ct). Angle Orthod 2008; 79: 91–6. 36. Leach HA, Ireland AJ, Whaites E J. Radiology: Radiographic diagnosis of root resorption in relation to orthodontics. Br Dent J 2001; 190: 16–22. 37. Sameshima GT, Asgarifar KO. Assessment of root resorption and root shape: periapical vs panoramic films. Angle Orthod 2000; 71: 185–9. 38. Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Ricciardi A, Scribante A, Klersy C, Auricchio F. Evaluation of friction of stainless steel and esthetic self-ligating brackets in various bracket-archwire combination. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2003; 124: 395–406. 39. Hain M, Dhopatkar A, Rock P. The effect of ligation method on friction in sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2003; 123: 416–22. 40. Southard TE, Marshall SD, Grosland NM. Friction does not increase anchorage loading. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2007; 131: 412–4. 41. Braun S, Bluestein M, Moore K, Benson G. Friction in perspective. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1999; 115: 19–27. 42. McDonald F, Toms AP. A scanning electron microscopic investigation of ceramic orthodontic bracket. Saudi Dental Journal 1990; 2(3): 91–5. 43. Jeena AK, Duggal R, Mehrota AK. Physical properties and clinical characteristic of ceramic bracket: a comprehensive review. Trends Biomater Artif Organs 2007; 20(2): 101–15. 44. Acar A, Canyurek U, Kocaaga M, Erverdi N. Continous vs. discontinous force application and root resorption. Angle Orthod 1999; 69: 159–63. HistoryItem_V1 TrimAndShift Range: all pages Trim: cut bottom edge by 8.50 points Shift: none Normalise (advanced option): 'original' 32 1 0 No 789 202 None Up 0.0000 0.0000 Both AllDoc CurrentAVDoc Smaller 8.5039 Bottom QITE_QuiteImposingPlus2 Quite Imposing Plus 2 2.0a Quite Imposing Plus 2 1 0 54 53 54 1 HistoryItem_V1 TrimAndShift Range: all pages Trim: extend top edge by 8.50 points Shift: none Normalise (advanced option): 'original' 32 1 0 No 789 202 None Up 0.0000 0.0000 Both AllDoc CurrentAVDoc Bigger 8.5039 Top QITE_QuiteImposingPlus2 Quite Imposing Plus 2 2.0a Quite Imposing Plus 2 1 0 54 53 54 1 HistoryItem_V1 TrimAndShift Range: all odd numbered pages Trim: cut right edge by 2.83 points Shift: none Normalise (advanced option): 'original' 32 1 0 No 789 202 None Up 0.0000 0.0000 Odd AllDoc CurrentAVDoc Smaller 2.8346 Right QITE_QuiteImposingPlus2 Quite Imposing Plus 2 2.0a Quite Imposing Plus 2 1 0 54 52 27 1 HistoryItem_V1 TrimAndShift Range: all odd numbered pages Trim: extend left edge by 2.83 points Shift: none Normalise (advanced option): 'original' 32 1 0 No 789 202 None Up 0.0000 0.0000 Odd AllDoc CurrentAVDoc Bigger 2.8346 Left QITE_QuiteImposingPlus2 Quite Imposing Plus 2 2.0a Quite Imposing Plus 2 1 0 54 52 27 1 HistoryItem_V1 TrimAndShift Range: all even numbered pages Trim: cut left edge by 2.83 points Shift: none Normalise (advanced option): 'original' 32 1 0 No 789 202 None Up 0.0000 0.0000 Even AllDoc CurrentAVDoc Smaller 2.8346 Left QITE_QuiteImposingPlus2 Quite Imposing Plus 2 2.0a Quite Imposing Plus 2 1 0 54 53 27 1 HistoryItem_V1 TrimAndShift Range: all even numbered pages Trim: extend right edge by 2.83 points Shift: none Normalise (advanced option): 'original' 32 1 0 No 789 202 None Up 0.0000 0.0000 Even AllDoc CurrentAVDoc Bigger 2.8346 Right QITE_QuiteImposingPlus2 Quite Imposing Plus 2 2.0a Quite Imposing Plus 2 1 0 54 53 27 1 HistoryList_V1 qi2base