Microsoft Word - 450 2023.docx Comparison of caries removal using Carisolv or a conven2onal slow speed rotary instrument on a group of children aged 4-14 years in private specialized clinic in Baghdad Vol 11 No 1 (2023) DOI 10.5195/d3000.2023.450 h#p://den*stry3000.pi#.edu Comparison of caries removal using Carisolv or a conventional slow speed rotary instrument on a group of children aged 4-14 years in private specialized clinic in Baghdad Nidhal Ali1, Abduloma Ali1, Istabraq Baker1 1Al-Mustafa University College, Dentistry department Abstract Carisolv is the only NaOCl-based chemical-mechanical caries removal product that is currently available on the market with a pH 11. Par2cipants in the study who had primary caries lesions on their teeth were divided into two groups. The experimental group received chemical-mechanical treatment with Carisolv® gel (N=54) whereas the control group received tradi2onal treatment model- by drilling and excava2on (N=47). Children who were par2cipa2ng in the study had at least two primary caries lesions in the same group of teeth and were being treated by a pediatric den2st at a specialty dental clinic. Children with two or more iden2cal caries lesions in the same set of teeth took part in this study. Using Carisolv® gel on one of the selected teeth (the experimental tooth), while drilling and excava2ng the other tooth as usual, both the experimental and control teeth were placed on the leN side of the jaw. It was successful in geQng the parents of the children to agree to have them par2cipate in the study. Using Carisolv® gel, we conducted a clinical comparison of the tradi2onal and chemical-mechanical approaches in this study. The aim of this research was to compare a chemical-mechanical approach of caries removal with rotary instruments for children's deciduous and permanent teeth using Carisolv® gel and determine whether anesthesia is required. KEYWORDS: Dental Caries; Preven2on; Clinical Trial; Fluoride Cita9on: Ali, N et al. (2023) Comparison of caries removal using Carisolv or a conven9onal slow speed rotary instrument on a group of children aged 4-14 years in private specialized clinic in Baghdad Den9stry 3000. 1:a001 doi:10.5195/d3000.2023.450 Received: February 18, 2023 Accepted: April 10, 2023 Published: April 21, 2023 Copyright: ©2023 Ali, N et al. This is an open access ar9cle licensed under a Crea9ve Commons AUribu9on Work 4.0 United States License. Email: Dr.nidhal_dental@almustafauniversity.edu.iq Introduction A significant issue in pediatric dentistry is dental caries. The interaction of environmental, behavioral, and host factors lead to the development of this complex disease. It causes the organic portion of the tooth's structure to be destroyed and its inorganic component to become demineralized [1]. The typical caries removal, which frequently results in discomfort especially in children, is uncomfortable for many patients and requires anesthetics when using rotary instruments [2]. Anesthetic use may be limited under similar circumstances as those with allergies, anxiety, or other illnesses. Due to children's greater sensitivity to pain than adults, the standard dental treatment for teeth might be problematic for young patients [3]. Drilling can harm the tooth pulp, hence an alternative approach to caries removal is desirable. Carisolv® is a chemo-mechanical caries eradication technique that protects healthy tooth tissue. Comparison of caries removal using Carisolv or a conven2onal slow speed rotary instrument on a group of children aged 4-14 years in private specialized clinic in Baghdad Vol 11 No 1 (2023) DOI 10.5195/d3000.2023.450 h#p://den*stry3000.pi#.edu Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART), air abrasion, laser, sono abrasion, and chemical-mechanical caries removal (CMCR) are some of the numerous techniques that are included in it [4]. Chemical-mechanical caries removal (CMCR) is a minimally invasive procedure that uses a chemical substance to remove the diseased dentin. The healthy dental structure is also preserved using this technique, preventing patient discomfort and pulp irritation. This method of caries eradication relies on dissolving rather than drilling. This method excavates soft carious dentin using chemical agents and atraumatic mechanical force [5]. The sole NaOCl-based chemical- mechanical caries removal agent that is currently commercially marketed is Carisolv. Carisolv, the most recent iteration of the NaOCl-based chemical-mechanical agents, was released in 1998 by Medi Team Denta- lutveckling AB, Göteborg, Sweden. The advantage of Carisolv over Caridex is that it does not need to be heated and does not need a particular delivery system because it comes in a gel form [6]. Material and Methods Children who were participating in the study had at least two primary caries lesions in the same group of teeth and were being treated by a pediatric dentist at a specialty dental clinic. The protocol of this study was approved by the Ethics Committee of (651). Children with two or more identical caries lesions in the same set of teeth took part in this study. Using Carisolv® gel on one of the selected teeth (the experimental tooth), while drilling and excavating the other tooth as usual, Both the experimental and control teeth were placed on the left side of the jaw. It was successful in getting the parents of the children to agree to have them participate in the study. The study's participants (teeth with primary caries lesions) were split into two groups: the experimental group (N=54) underwent chemical- mechanical treatment with Carisolv® gel, and the control group (N=47) underwent a traditional treatment model by drilling and excavation. Results Results are summarized in Tables 1 through 5. Caries experience in the study participants. Experimental group Total caries lesions Deep caries Total Age 4 - 6 18 14 32 Groups 6 - 14 15 7 22 Total 33 21 54 Control group Total caries lesions Deep caries Total Age 4 - 6 14 32 Groups 6 - 14 7 22 Total 21 54 Table 1: Age and diagnosis of patients. Comparison of caries removal using Carisolv or a conven2onal slow speed rotary instrument on a group of children aged 4-14 years in private specialized clinic in Baghdad Vol 11 No 1 (2023) DOI 10.5195/d3000.2023.450 h#p://den*stry3000.pi#.edu Frequency Symptom Pain 12 Other 12 No complaints 25 Unpleasant taste and smell 3 Pain and unpleasant taste 2 Total 54 Frequency Anesthetic use yes 9 no 45 Total 54 Frequency Anesthetic use yes 15 no 32 Total 47 Frequency Use of drill yes 31 no 23 Total 54 Discussion A primary goal of dental researchers looking for potential alternatives to current conventional approaches in the area of pediatric dentistry has always been the development of new techniques for eliminating caries. Using CarisolvTM gel, we conducted a clinical comparison of the traditional and chemomechanical approaches in this study. Carisolv® can be used as an alternative in many situations, particularly when treating children, apprehensive patients, and patients with allergies. It is, however, unable to completely replace rotational instruments for the elimination of caries. Participants perceived that the length of treatment to be shorter with Carisolv®. On the other hand, because anesthesia was used, which takes 5–10 minutes to be effective, the overall drilling procedure may take longer. Due to the operators' insufficient training and experience, the working time with Carisolv® in our study may have been longer. The frequency of complaints of discomfort decreased more than two- fold when Carisolv® gel was used, proving that this procedure is far less unpleasant than the standard drilling method. Almost half of the patients Table 2: Complaints within chemical-mechanical treatment group. Table 3: Use of anesthetics in the chemical-mechanical treatment group. Table 5: Use of drill in the chemical-mechanical treatment group. Table 4: Use of anesthetics in the traditional treatment (control) group. Comparison of caries removal using Carisolv or a conven2onal slow speed rotary instrument on a group of children aged 4-14 years in private specialized clinic in Baghdad Vol 11 No 1 (2023) DOI 10.5195/d3000.2023.450 h#p://den*stry3000.pi#.edu who used this approach reported no concerns. Additionally, it might be argued that the chemical-mechanical technique completely lacked disagreeable tastes and odors. References 1. Hamama HH, Yiu CK, Burrow MF. Caries management: a journey between black's principals and minimally invasive concepts. Int J Oral Sci. 2015;2(8):120– 125.doi: 10.19070/2377-8075- 1500026. 2. Rao, D., Panwar, S. and Narula, H. An in-vivo comparaWve evaluaWon of the efficacy of two different papain based chemo- mechanical caries removalagents in primary molars’. (2020) ‘InternaWonal Journal of ScienWfic Research, 9(3), pp. 43–45. 3. Hegde, S. et al. Clinical efficiency of three caries removal systems: Rotary excavaWon, carisolv, and papacarie. (2016), Journal of DenWstry for Children. 4. Showkat, N. et al. Minimal Invasive DenWstry: Literature Review’, Journal of Current Medical Research and Opinion. 2020. 3(09). doi: 10.15520/jcmro.v3i09.340. 5. Hamama H, Yiu C, Burrow M. Current update of chemomechanical caries removal methods. Aust Dent J. 2014;59(4):446–456. doi: 10.1111/adj.12214. 6. Ericson D, Zimmerman M, Raber H, Gotrick B, Bornstein R, Thorell J. Clinical evaluaWon of efficacy and safety of a new method for chemo-mechanical removal of caries. Caries Res 1999;33:171– 177.