Dermatology: Practical and Conceptual Research Letter | Dermatol Pract Concept. 2023;13(3):e2023160 1 Can Cemiplimab Become a Life-Changer in Xeroderma Pigmentosum? Maria Boziou1, Dimitrios Dionyssiou2, Dimitrios Dionyssopoulos3, Elizabeth Lazaridou1, Aimilios Lallas4, Zoe Apalla1 1 Second Dermatology Department, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece 2 Department of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece 3 Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece 4 First Dermatology Department, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece Key words: immune checkpoint inhibitors, cemiplimab, xeroderma pigmentosum, squamous cell carcinoma, melanoma Citation: Boziou M, Dionyssiou D, Dionyssopoulos D, Lazaridou E, Lallas A, Apalla Z. Can Cemiplimab Become a Life-Changer in Xeroderma Pigmentosum?. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2023;13(3):e2023160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5826/dpc.1303a160 Accepted: December 9, 2022; Published: July 2023 Copyright: ©2023 Boziou et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial License (BY-NC-4.0), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/, which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited. Funding: None. Competing interests: None. Authorship: All authors have contributed significantly to this publication. Corresponding author: Maria Boziou, MD, Agiou Pavlou 76, Thessaloniki, Greece tel:+302313323274 E-mail: mariaboziou@gmail.com Introduction Xeroderma Pigmentosum (XP) is a rare inherited autosomal recessive disease, resulting in defective repair of the ultravio- let radiation induced DNA damage. Prognosis of xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) is unfavorable, with most patients dying from metastatic skin cancer before the age of 30. Management is extremely challenging and includes strict avoidance of sun exposure, close monitoring and early thera- peutic interventions. Cemiplimab is an anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibody, approved for advanced nonmela- noma Skin Cancers (NMSCs) and tested also for melanoma. Taking into account the spectrum of malignancies appearing in the context of XP, anti-PD-1 antibodies may represent the ideal treatment choice [1-8]. Case Presentation A 29-year-old female with XP was referred to our onco- dermatology, multidisciplinary unit for management. The pa- tient had undergone numerous surgical excisions in the past. Upon clinical examination, apart from extensive freckling and numerous actinic keratoses, we identified two atypical melanocytic lesions compatible with melanoma and multiple basal (BCC) and squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) (Figure 1). CT scan of chest, upper/lower abdomen and brain MRI were unremarkable. We decided to proceed with an “en-bloc” resection of the skin of the forehead, due to the extreme cancer burden, plus resection of the second atypical melanocytic lesion of the lower face. Histologic examination of the forehead skin 2 Research Letter | Dermatol Pract Concept. 2023;13(3):e2023160 showed a fully regressed melanoma, two SCCs and nine BCCs. The second melanocytic lesion was diagnosed as tu- moral melanosis. Breslow thickness could not be defined due to full regression. A combination of photodynamic therapy(PDT), sequen- tially to 5% imiquimod cream, plus 10mg of daily oral ac- itretin, as a prophylactic modality, were used. However, the locally advanced SCC of the eyelid that invaded the conjunc- tiva posed a serious therapeutic dilemma, since its surgical removal would inevitably lead to eye loss. Considering the limitations of the surgery, the concomitant presence of a sec- ond large SCC involving the right nasolabial fold and the overall NMSCs burden in the cancerized areas, we decided to set the patient under treatment with cemiplimab. After 1.5 year of systemic treatment with cemiplimab, there is a remarkable response (Figure 2), with excellent tol- erance and the treatment is still ongoing. Conclusions XP is an ideal model for studying effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) on skin malignancies, especially when i0074 comes to the treatment of advanced SCCs and BCCs, coexisting with melanoma. Carrying out a literature review, we retrieved eight individuals with XP treated with ICIs, with only one of them receiving cemiplimab (Table 1). Overall, as in our patient, individuals receiving ICIs demon- strated a constant response of locally advanced and meta- static tumors of both origins, epithelial and melanocytic. Tolerability and safety were satisfactory as in our patient. The particularity of the current case is the concomitant presence of unresectable NMSCs and two melanomas, which is a common scenario in the context of XP. ICIs, due to their dual therapeutic effect on both, epithelial and melanocytic skin cancers, may open a new therapeutic horizon, changing the so far unfavorable fate of XP patients. Figure 1. Extreme photodamage, with multiple freckles, two mela- nomas (arrows) and numerous Nonmelanoma Skin Cancers on the face, including two advanced squamous cell carcinoma, one at the right lower eyelid and one at the right nasolabial fold. Figure 2. The patient after 1.5 year of cemiplimab initiation. We ob- serve complete clinical response, not only of the unresectable squa- mous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the right lower eyelid, but also of the non-resected SCC involving the right nasolabial fold, as well as of the multiple smaller Nonmelanoma Skin Cancers of the facial skin. Research Letter | Dermatol Pract Concept. 2023;13(3):e2023160 3 Ta b le 1 . O u tc o m es o f u se o f im m u n e ch ec k p o in t in h ib it o rs i n x er o d er m a p ig m en to su m p at ie n ts R e fe re n ce s A g e / S e x Tu m o r (I C Is t a rg e t) S it e IC I u se d O u tc o m e o f ta rg e t tu m o r O u tc o m e o f co e x is ti n g tu m o rs IC I d e ri v e d A E s A d d it io n a l tr e a tm e n t R u b at to e t al [ 1 ] 1 9 /F N o n o p er ab le , m et as ta ti c SC C R ig h t o rb it al a n d n as al c av it y w it h l ym p h n o d e m et as ta si s C em ip li m ab 3 5 0 m g ev er y 3 w ee k s P ar ti al r es p o n se R eg re ss io n o f N M SC s, A K D ia rr h ea R ad io th er ap y A m er i et a l [2 ] 1 8 /F N o n o p er ab le S C C L im b u s o f ri gh t ey e P em b ro li zu m ab 2 m g/ k g ev er y 3 w ee k s C o m p le te re sp o n se N o r es p o n se o f fa ci al B C C s - - A m er i, et  a l [2 ] 1 9 /M N o n o p er ab le S C C R ig h t o rb it al a n d n as al c av it y P em b ro li zu m ab 2 m g/ k g ev er y 3 w ee k s P ar ti al r es p o n se - - - A m er i et a l [2 ] 2 0 /F i) M et as ta ti c M el an o m a ii ) N o n o p er ab le SC C i) M U P ii ) M ax il la ry s in u s i) Ip il im u m ab 1 0 m g/ k g ev er y 3 w ee k s ii ) P em b ro li zu m ab 1 4 0 m g/ m o n th i) N o ta b le re sp o n se ii ) N o ta b le re sp o n se t il l ra d io gr ap h ic p ro gr es si o n - - - H au sc h il d e t al [ 3 ]. 3 5 1 /M M et as ta ti c M el an o m a L ef t ch ee k w it h m u lt ip le p u lm o n ar y, l ym p h n o d e an d ri gh t in fr ao rb it al m et as ta se s P em b ro li zu m ab 2 m g/ k g ev er y 3 w ee k s 9 0 % r eg re ss io n o f th e la rg es t lu n gm et as ta si s. C o m p le te re gr es si o n o f th e o th er s. R eg re ss io n o f al m o st a ll N M SC s, A K R ed d is h sw el li n g o f th e ri gh t o rb it a, in fl am m at o ry ra sh i n s u n - d am ag ed s k in , m il d i tc h in g - D ei n le in e t al [ 4 ] 4 8 /F M et as ta ti c SC C L ef t ti gh t w it h a b d o m in al , in gu in al a n d l ef t su p ra cl av ic u la r ly m p h n o d e m et as ta se s P em b ro li zu m ab 2 m g/ k g ev er y 3 w ee k s Si gn ifi ca n t re gr es si o n o f al l m et as ta se s N o im p ro ve m en t o n so la r le n ti gi n es - M et as ta ti c su p ra cl av ic u la r ly m p h ad en ec to m y C h am b o n e t al [ 5 ] 6 /F i) Sa rc o m at o id ca rc in o m a ii )S C C Sc al p w it h b o n e ly ti c le si o n s, va sc u la r, m en in ge al c o n ta ct an d s u p er io r sa gi tt al s in u s in vo lv em en t i) N iv o lu m ab 3 m g/ k g ev er y 2 w ee k s ii ) N iv o lu m ab m o n th ly & C et u x im ab 2 5 0 m g/ m 2 /w ee k , 3 w ee k s o u t o f 4 6 5 % R eg re ss io n o f th e Sa rc o m at o id ca rc in o m a. N o re sp o n se t o S C C A p p ea ra n ce o f tw o i n va si ve M el an o m as o n th e sc al p . M u lt ip le cu ta n eo u s, l ip , to n gu e tu m o rs - C h em o th er ap y (5 F U , C is p la ti n ), su rg er y T ab le 1 c o n ti n u es 4 Research Letter | Dermatol Pract Concept. 2023;13(3):e2023160 R e fe re n ce s A g e / S e x Tu m o r (I C Is t a rg e t) S it e IC I u se d O u tc o m e o f ta rg e t tu m o r O u tc o m e o f co e x is ti n g tu m o rs IC I d e ri v e d A E s A d d it io n a l tr e a tm e n t Sa lo m o n e t al [ 6 ] 1 7 /M M et as ta ti c M el an o m a Sc al p w it h l iv er a n d p u lm o n ar y m et as ta se s P em b ro li zu m ab 2 m g/ k g ev er y 3 w ee k s P ar ti al re sp o n se o f al l m et as ta se s, l o n g la st in g d is ea se st ab il iz at io n R eg re ss io n o f N M SC s, A K V it il ig o id d ep ig m en ta ti o n o n s u n -e x p o se d ar ea s - St ei n ec k e t  al [ 7 ]7 7 /F M et as ta ti c SC C R ig h t si d e o f th e fa ce sp re ad in g to t h e ri gh t sp h en o id b o n e, t h e ca ve rn o u s si n u s, t h e ri gh t ca ro ti d a rt er y, th e su rr o u n d in g ti ss u es , th e ly m p h n o d es & t h e le p to m en in ge al P em b ro li zu m ab 2 m g/ k g ev er y 3 w ee k s R ed u ct io n o f tu m o r si ze , re so lu ti o n o f le p to m en in ge al sp re ad , l o n g la st in g d is ea se st ab il iz at io n R es p o n se o f m o st o f th e o cu lo cu ta n eo u s le si o n s. M il d p ro gr es si o n o f a ri gh t co rn ea l SC C - - M o m en e t al [ 8 ] 3 2 /M C u ta n eo u s an gi o sa rc o m a L ef t ey eb ro w w it h m et as ta ti c p u lm o n ar y, p er ic ar d ia l, m ed ia st in al , p le u ra l, su b m an d ib u la r, h ep at ic & b o n e d is ea se P em b ro li zu m ab 2 0 0 m g/ k g ev er y 3 w ee k s C o m p le te re sp o n se o f th e p u lm o n ar y & b o n e m et as ta se s, al m o st c o m p le te re sp o n se o f th e ca rd ia c & p er ic ar d ia l d is ea se , re gr es si o n o f th e h ep at ic , su b m an d ib u la r & p le u ra l le si o n s - - R ad io th er ap y A E s = a d ve rs e ev en ts ; A K = a ct in ic k er at o se s; B C C = b as al c el l ca rc in o m a; F = f em al e; I C I = i m m u n e ch ec k p o in t in h ib it o r; M = m al e; M U P = m el an o m a o f u n k n o w n p ri m ar y; N M SC s = n o n -m el an o m a sk in ca n ce rs ; SC C = s q u am o u s ce ll c ar ci n o m a. Ta b le 1 . O u tc o m es o f u se o f im m u n e ch ec k p o in t in h ib it o rs i n x er o d er m a p ig m en to su m p at ie n ts ( co n ti n u ed ) Research Letter | Dermatol Pract Concept. 2023;13(3):e2023160 5 References 1. Rubatto M, Merli M, Avallone G, et al. Immunotherapy in Xe- roderma Pigmentosum: a case of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma treated with cemiplimab and a literature review. Oncotarget. 2021;12(11):1116-1121. DOI: 10.18632/oncotar- get.27966. PMID: 34084285. PMCID: PMC8169062. 2. Ameri AH, Mooradian MJ, Emerick KS, et al. Immunotherapeu- tic strategies for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma prevention in xeroderma pigmentosum. Br J Dermatol. 2019;181(5):1095- 1097. DOI: 10.1111/bjd.18144. PMID: 31102460. 3. Hauschild A, Eichstaedt J, Möbus L, et al. Regression of mel- anoma metastases and multiple non-melanoma skin cancers in xeroderma pigmentosum by the PD1-antibody pembrolizumab. Eur J Cancer. 2017;77:84–87. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.02.026. PMID: 28365530. 4. Deinlein T, Lax SF, Schwarz T, Giuffrida R, Schmid- Zalaudek K, Zalaudek I. Rapid response of metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma to pembrolizumab in a patient with xeroderma pigmentosum: Case report and review of the literature. Eur J Cancer. 2017;83:99–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.06.022. PMID: 28734147. 5. Chambon F, Osdoit S, Bagny K, Moro A, Nguyen J, Réguerre Y. Dramatic response to nivolumab in xeroderma pigmentosum skin tumor. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2018;65(2). DOI: 10.1002/ pbc.26837. PMID: 28988442. 6. Salomon G, Maza A, Boulinguez S, et al. Efficacy of anti- programmed cell death-1 immunotherapy for skin carcinomas and melanoma metastases in a patient with xeroderma pigmen- tosum. Br J Dermatol. 2018;178(5):1199-1203. DOI: 10.1111 /bjd.16270. PMID: 29274233. 7. Steineck A, Krumm N, Sarthy JF, et al. Response to Pem- brolizumab in a Patient With Xeroderma Pigmentosum and Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma. JCO Precis Oncol. 2019;3:PO.19.00028. DOI: 10.1200/PO.19.00028. PMID: 32923855. PMCID: PMC7446378. 8. Momen S, Fassihi H, Davies HR, et al. Dramatic response of met- astatic cutaneous angiosarcoma to an immune checkpoint inhib- itor in a patient with xeroderma pigmentosum: whole-genome sequencing aids treatment decision in end-stage disease. Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud. 2019;5(5):a004408. DOI: 10.1101 /mcs.a004408. PMID: 31645345. PMCID: PMC6824248.