Dermatology: Practical and Conceptual Original Article | Dermatol Pract Concept. 2023;13(3):e2023190 1 Vitamin D Levels in Children During Winter and the Relationship Between Sunscreen and Sun Protection Behaviors Burcu Tugrul1, Hatice Gamze Demirdag2, Aysin Hanli Sahin3 1 Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Department of Dermatology, Ankara, Turkey 2 Private Practice, Dermatology Clinic, Ankara, Turkey 3 Health Science University, Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Ankara, Turkey Key words: vitamin D, sunscreens, sun protection, vitamin D deficiency, vitamin D status in children Citation: Tugrul B, Demirdag HG, Hanli Sahin A. Vitamin D Levels in Children During Winter and the Relationship Between Sunscreen and Sun Protection Behaviors. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2023;13(3):e2023190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5826/dpc.1303a190 Accepted: March 4, 2023; Published: July 2023 Copyright: ©2023 Tugrul et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial License (BY-NC-4.0), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/, which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited. Funding: None. Competing Interests: None. Authorship: All authors have contributed significantly to this publication. Corresponding Author: Hatice Gamze Demirdag, Private Practice, Dermatology Clinic, Ankara, Turkey. E-mail address: demirdaggamze@gmail.com The parents patients in this manuscript have given written informed consent to the publication of their case details. Introduction: Sunlight is the major source of vitamin D, thus, the use of sunscreens could result in vitamin D insufficiency or deficiency. Objectives: Our study aimed to assess serum vitamin D levels in healthy children aged 0-18 years in the winter season and determine the association between sunscreen use and sun protection behaviors on vitamin D status. Methods: The demographic data, clothing style, skin type, history of sunburn, history of visiting sea- side towns in summer, sun protection behaviors including sunscreen use, wearing sunglasses and hats, and further detailed information about sunscreen use were recorded. Vitamin D status was assessed by measuring blood levels of total 25(OH)D during winter. ABSTRACT 2 Original Article | Dermatol Pract Concept. 2023;13(3):e2023190 Introduction The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency among different pediatric age groups was evaluated by sev- eral studies and high percentages of hypovitaminosis D were reported worldwide [1-3]. Exposure of the skin to sunlight is the major source of vitamin D. Only some food including oily fish such as salmon, swordfish, tuna, cod liver oil, and sun- dried mushrooms naturally contain adequate vitamin D [3]. Vitamin D-fortified milk and orange juice provide another food source for vitamin D [5]. The main reason for vitamin D deficiency is inadequate exposure to sunlight [1-6]. When the human skin is exposed to sunlight, most of this UVB radiation is absorbed in the epidermis and most vitamin D is produced in the living cells in the epidermis [7,8]. Sun- light exposure-induced vitamin D synthesis is influenced by many important variables including the season of the year, time of day, latitude, altitude, air pollution, skin color, age, area of skin exposed, clothing habits, sunscreen use, sunlight passing through glass and plastic, and aging [8,9]. Sun protection is widely recommended from childhood to prevent both melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer as ultraviolet radiation (UVR) causes sunburn and UVR is defined as a carcinogen. Sunscreens were designed to absorb solar UVB radiation. Concerns have been expressed about the negative effects of limiting UVB exposure on vitamin D status because vitamin D production is associated with direct sunlight exposure [7,10]. The role that sunscreens play in reducing vitamin D synthesis is still unclear [1]. Although experimental studies suggest a theoretical risk that sunscreen use may affect vitamin D, there are no randomized controlled trials or longitudinal studies reporting that sunscreens sig- nificantly suppress cutaneous vitamin D synthesis [9,11]. There are only limited real-life studies evaluating the re- lationship between sunscreen use and serum levels of vitamin D in children in the recent literature. Less is known about the association between other recommended sun protection behaviors (such as wearing a hat and sunglasses) and vitamin D levels. Objectives Our study aimed to assess serum vitamin D levels in healthy children aged 0-18 years in the winter season and determine the association between sunscreen use and sun protection be- haviors on vitamin D status. Methods The study was conducted in dermatology and pediatrics out- patient clinics between December 2021 and March 2022 in a Training and Research Hospital in Ankara. The study period was chosen as winter, with minimum ultraviolet exposure in the middle region of Türkiye, taking into account the differences in serum levels of vitamin D that may be shown by the season and sun exposure. Institutional review board protocol approval was obtained from the hospital ethics and scientific committee (Approval date: 08.07.2021, Decision number: 2021-07/1273), and written informed consent was obtained from the parents of all the children. This research was conducted in compliance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The participants in this study were randomly selected from Caucasian children who were admitted to pediatric outpatient clinics for routine examinations. Healthy children aged 0-18 years, both girls and boys, were enrolled in the study. Adolescence is the life stage between childhood and adulthood, between the ages of 10 and 19 years; our study groups are classified according to age groups as children aged under 10 years, and adolescents as age 10 years and older. The demographic data, clothing style, history of sunburn, history of visiting seaside towns to swim in summer, and sun protection behaviors including sunscreen use and wearing sunglasses and hats were obtained from each parent and child through face-to-face interviews. Detailed information about Results: Three hundred seventy-six children (172 boys and 204 girls) with a mean age of 128.38±56.39 months were enrolled. The mean serum level of 25(OH)D was 15.32±8.64 ng/mL. The mean values of vitamin D were associated with age, sex, traditional clothing style, having a sunburn history, and sunscreen use (P < 0.05). Adolescents and girls had vitamin D deficiency and inadequacy more than younger children and boys (P < 0.05). Sunscreen use in the adequacy group was lower than in the inadequacy and deficiency groups (P = 0.001). There was no significant difference between vitamin D status according to the sunscreen details (sun protection factor, product source, season, and body areas) (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Sunscreen use appears to reduce vitamin D levels measured in winter. Children, especially girls and adolescents, should be exposed to sufficient sunlight to maintain normal serum vitamin D levels. Vitamin D supplementation should be given to children, especially during winter. Original Article | Dermatol Pract Concept. 2023;13(3):e2023190 3 sunscreen use, whether sunscreen products were bought from pharmacies or supermarkets, sun protection factor (SPF) levels (SPF ≤ 30 or SPF 50), applying sunscreen to the face and/or body, and applying sunscreen in the summertime, sunny days or all seasons were also recorded. The weight and height of the participants were assessed using a standard pro- tocol, and body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg)/height (m)2. The clothing style of participants who wore long sleeves and pants/skirts all year was expressed as tradi- tional clothing. The children’s skin color was classified us- ing the Fitzpatrick skin phototype classification, which was based on the skin’s response to ultraviolet light [12]. Vitamin D status is assessed by measuring blood levels of total 25(OH)D. Serum levels of 25(OH)D were measured us- ing a Roche Cobas E601 Modular Diagnostic System. Data were recorded from the laboratory results in the hospital data system. We used the widely used cut-off points as suggested by Munns et al [13]. According to their criteria, vitamin D de- ficiency was defined as a serum 25(OH)D level of <12 ng/mL (<30 nmol/L) and insufficiency as a 25(OH)D level between 12 and 20 ng/mL (30-50 nmol/L). Twenty-five(OH)D levels >20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L) were accepted as adequate. The exclusion criteria were intake of vitamin D supple- ments during the previous year, risk factors for the develop- ment of vitamin D deficiency, known metabolic bone disease, diseases or medicines known to affect vitamin D or calcium metabolism, acute diseases during the past two months, and chronic health conditions, e.g., diabetes mellitus, obesity. Ad- ditionally, children with excessively high and toxic levels of 25(OH)D were excluded. Statistical Analysis Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Pack- age for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows version 20.0 software package. Descriptive statistics are presented as numbers and percentages for categorical variables, and mean ± standard deviation and minimum-maximum values for numerical variables. In the analysis of numerical data, com- pliance with normal distribution was examined using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, and because all numerical vari- ables did not show normal distribution, the Mann-Whitney U test was used in the comparison of two independent groups, and the Kruskal-Wallis H test was used in the com- parisons of more than two groups. Analyses of categorical variables were performed using the Chi-square test. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results After 44 children who were under supplement treatment were excluded, the study group consisted of 376 children (172 boys and 204 girls) with a mean age of 128.38 ± 56.39 months and median age of 132 (min 9-max 216) months. The mean serum level of 25(OH)D was 15.32 ± 8.64 ng/mL. The mean BMI of the children was 19.22 ± 10.99 kg/m2 and the median was 18.66 kg/m2. The percentages of data and comparisons of demographic data and mean values of vita- min D are presented in Table 1. The most seen skin type was Fitzpatrick type 4 with 50%. Fitzpatrick skin types 1 and 6 were not found in the study group. Some 12.5% of children had a history of sunburn, and 4.8% wore traditional cloth- ing. Nearly 60% of the children regularly visited a seaside town in summer, 64.4% of children wore a hat under the sun, and 31.1% wore sunglasses. More than half of the chil- dren (58.5%) did not use sunscreens. The mean values of vitamin D were low in children aged over 10 years old, girls, those who wore traditional clothing, had a sunburn history, and sunscreen users (P < 0.05). Table 2 presents the details of sunscreen use in the group that used sunscreen; 55% of the group preferred sunscreens with SPF ≤30. Sunscreen products were bought almost equally from both pharmacies and supermarkets. Of the children who used sunscreen, half used sunscreens only in summer and nearly 95% of children applied sunscreen both to the face and body. There was no significant difference between the details of sunscreen use and vitamin D levels (P > 0.05). Vitamin D deficiency was recorded in 33.5% (N = 126) of the children and inadequacy was in 46% (N = 173). Seventy-seven (20.5%) patients had adequate levels of vitamin D. There was a significant difference among age groups and sex in terms of adequacy of vitamin D (P = 0.003 and P < 0.001, respectively). Adolescents and girls had vi- tamin D deficiency and inadequacy more than younger children and boys. There was a statistically significant differ- ence in terms of vitamin D levels according to sunscreen use (P = 0.001). The rate of sunscreen use in the adequacy group was lower than in the inadequacy and deficiency groups. There was no significant difference between vitamin D de- ficiency/inadequacy/adequacy groups according to the sun- screen SPF, product source, in which season sunscreen was used, and areas of the body it was used (P > 0.05) (Table 3). Conclusions The present study evaluated the relationship between vita- min D status and sun protection behaviors and sunscreen use in a Turkish pediatric series. It revealed that 79.5% of the patients had deficient and inadequate levels of vitamin D. Adolescents, girls, and sunscreen users had lower serum lev- els of vitamin D causing deficiency and inadequacy. History of sunburn and traditional clothing had only a lowering 4 Original Article | Dermatol Pract Concept. 2023;13(3):e2023190 Table 1. Demographic data and vitamin D levels in the study group (N = 376). N (%) Vitamin D Mean±SD P value Age, years <10 >=10 153 (40.7) 223 (59.3) 17.49±10.58 13.93±6.54 <0.001 Gender Male Female 172 (45.7) 204 (54.3) 16.64±8.27 14.32±8.73 0.001 Skin type Type 2 Type 3 Type 4 Type 5 29 (7.7) 119 (31.6) 188 (50.0) 40 (10.6) 15.47±5.14 15.75±10.43 15.26±8.19 14.80±6.18 0.772 Clothing style Veiled Normal 18 (4.8) 358 (95.2) 11.53±5.30 15.58±8.68 0.023 History of sunburn Yes No 47 (12.5) 329 (87.5) 12.95±5.95 15.73±8.85 0.020 History of visiting seaside in summer regularly Yes No 224 (59.6) 152 (40.4) 15.06±7.36 15.86±10.13 0.792 Wearing a hat Yes No 242 (64.4) 134 (35.6) 15.06±7.11 15.97±10.76 0.864 Wearing sunglasses Yes No 117 (31.1) 259 (68.9) 14.58±6.85 15.74±9.25 0.484 Sunscreen usage Yes No 156 (41.5) 220 (58.5) 14.13±6.54 16.27±9.70 0.030 SD = standard deviation. Table 2. The details of sunscreen usage in the group using sunscreen (N =156) and vitamin D levels. N (%) Vitamin D Mean±SD P value Sunscreen SPF SPF 30/less than 30 SPF 50 86 (55.1) 70 (44.9) 14.37 ± 6.23 13.84 ± 6.95 0.625 Usage season Only summer Sunny days All seasons 84 (53.8) 35 (22.4) 37 (23.7) 13.51 ± 6.14 14.01 ± 5.48 15.67 ± 8.10 0.337 Product source Market Pharmacy 79 (50.6) 77 (49.4) 13.67 ± 6.22 14.61± 6.96 0.385 Areas used Only face Face and body 8 (5.1) 148 (94.9) 17.48 ± 7.53 13.95 ± 6.47 0.149 SD = standard deviation; SPF = sun protection factor. Table 3. Vitamin D deficiency, inadequacy, and adequacy according to demographic characteristics, sun protection behaviors and sunscreen details. Deficiency <12 (N =126) N (%) Inadequacy 12- 20 (N=173) N (%) Adequacy >20 (N=77) N (%) P value Age, years <10 >=10 42 (27.5) 84 (37.7) 67 (43.8) 106 (47.5) 44 (28.8) 33 (14.8) 0.003 Gender Male Female 50 (29.1) 76 (37.3) 71 (41.3) 102 (50) 51 (29.7) 26 (12.7) <0.001 Skin type Type 2 Type 3 Type 4 Type 5 8 (27.6) 36 (30.3) 67 (35.6) 15 (37.5) 17 (58.6) 57 (47.9) 81 (43.1) 18 (45) 4 (13.8) 26 (21.8) 40 (21.3) 7 (17.5) 0.737 Clothing style Veiled Normal 9 (50) 117 (32.7) 7 (38.9) 166 (46.4) 2 (11.1) 75 (20.9) 0.279 History of sunburn Yes No 19 (40.4) 107 (32.5) 24 (51.1) 149 (45.3) 4 (8.5) 73 (22.2) 0.090 History of visiting seaside in summer regularly Yes No 72 (32.1) 54 (35.5) 112 (50) 61 (40.1) 40 (17.9) 37 (24.3) 0.130 Wearing a hat Yes No 81 (33.5) 45 (33.6) 110 (45.5) 63 (47) 51 (21.1) 26 (19.4) 0.921 Wearing sunglasses Yes No 42 (35.9) 84 (32.4) 51 (43.6) 122 (47.1) 24 (20.5) 53 (20.5) 0.777 Sunscreen usage Yes No 53 (34) 73 (33.2) 85 (54.5) 88 (40) 18 (11.5) 59 (26.8) 0.001 Sunscreen details in suncreen usage group (n=156) Deficiency <12 (N=53) N (%) Inadequacy 12- 20 (N=85) N (%) Adequacy >20 (N=18) N (%) P value Sunscreen SPF SPF 30/less than 30 SPF 50 27 (31.4) 26 (37.1) 49 (57) 36 (51.4) 10 (11.6) 8 (11.4) 0.743 Usage season Only summer Sunny days All seasons 32 (38.1) 10 (28.6) 11 (29.7) 44 (52.4) 22 (62.9) 19 (51.4) 8 (9.5) 3 (8.6) 7 (18.9) 0.432 Product source Market Pharmacy 27 (34.2) 26 (33.8) 47 (59.5) 38 (49.4) 5 (6.3) 13 (16.9) 0.105 Areas used Only face Face and body 1 (12.5) 52 (35.1) 5 (62.5) 80 (54.1) 2 (25) 16 (10.8) 0.277 SPF = sun protection factor. 6 Original Article | Dermatol Pract Concept. 2023;13(3):e2023190 Conflictingly, Pulungan et al [27] found no significant differ- ence between vitamin D insufficient and vitamin D sufficient children related to types of clothing, among whom all girls wore hijabs (long sleeves, long skirts, and headscarves). Vitamin D levels were lower in children with a sun- burn history; however, no significant difference was found between vitamin D deficiency, inadequacy, and adequacy among children with a sunburn history. Having sunburn pre- viously may direct to more sun protection behaviors, there- fore, vitamin D levels may decrease. Linos et al found that sunscreen was more frequently used in subjects who were more likely to get sunburn [29]. To protect against UVR, almost all medical associations and societies recommend seeking shade during midday hours and wearing protective clothing, a hat with a wide brim, and sunglasses, besides using broad-spectrum sunscreens [29,30]. Although there was no relationship between vitamin D lev- els and wearing a hat and sunglasses, sunscreen users had lower levels of serum vitamin D. Wearing a sunhat or using sunscreen was not associated with lower vitamin D status in some studies [10,29]. In Hansen et al study, seeking shade and wearing protective clothing were significantly associated with lower vitamin D status in adults but not in children [10]. In another study, Danish school children who used hats rarely/never had 12.1 nmol/L higher vitamin D levels com- pared with school children who always/often used hats [31]. There is no clear relationship between vitamin D concentra- tions and sun exposure guidelines because, in real life, there is no certainty if children pay attention to sun protection [6]. Sunscreens limit the absorption of UVB radiation over the skin and applying sunscreens is encouraged in time to prevent sunburn, skin aging, and skin cancer development [9,32]. Us- ing sunscreens and their effect on vitamin D synthesis still seems to be confusing. Some studies showed that sunscreen agents caused a defect in the cutaneous synthesis of vitamin D [33-35]. Sunscreen use on the entire body blocked ultra- violet-induced vitamin D synthesis, if >19% of total body surface area was not applied with sunscreen, vitamin D lev- els increase significantly [35]. Similarly, Holick et al reported that daily application of sunscreen with SPF 8 on all sun-ex- posed body areas decreased vitamin D production by the skin [3]. Individuals with low sun exposure and regular use of sunscreens had an odds ratio of hypovitaminosis D [21]. Some studies found that sunscreens did not prevent the pro- duction of sufficient vitamin D. Vitamin D production can be reduced by the strict use of sunscreens at recommended con- centrations of 2 mg/cm2; however, their inadequate applica- tion (<2mg/cm2), mostly done by average users, does not lead vitamin D deficiency [5,9]. Marks et al [36] concluded that sufficient exposure to the sun was achieved during the Aus- tralian summer to allow adequate vitamin D production in subjects who regularly applied sunscreens. Farrerons et al [37] effect on mean serum levels of vitamin D but not the ade- quacy of vitamin D status in children. The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency observed varied from 24% to 99% in different studies and regions [14,15]. In Türkiye, the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency for children was 39.8% in a meta-analysis review [4]. In this study, vita- min D deficiency was found similarly at 33.5%. In a study with children aged 6-9 years, according to values measured throughout the year, vitamin D deficiency was observed in 5.6% of children and insufficiency in 18.6% [16]. We found a deficiency in 27.5% and inadequacy in 43.8% of those aged less than 10 years. The higher rate in our results may be due to the season. The study was conducted in winter when most children stay indoors. The average temperature in An- kara is 1.4°C and the mean duration of sunshine is 3 hours per day during winter [17]. Researchers found that vitamin D levels increased in summer [15,18] and decreased in win- ter [16,19-22]. Outdoor physical activities are also limited in winter. Thus, vitamin D deficiency continues to be a severe problem, especially in non-sunny seasons. Vitamin D deficiency increased with age in our study. In recent studies, older children and adolescents had lower median vitamin D levels than younger children, compatible with our results [6,15,18,22-25]. In the current study, the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in adolescents was 65.1% and insufficiency was 58.1%. By contrast, the prevalence of low concentrations of 25(OH)D in adolescents was found as 75% in Feketea et al study [6]. In adolescents from Kuwait, 81% and 15% of adolescents were vitamin D deficient or vi- tamin D insufficient, respectively [24]. Vitamin D deficiency was highly prevalent (61.6%) in Qatari adolescents aged 11-16 years. Older skin seems to synthesize less vitamin D than younger skin [23]. The serum levels of vitamin D were significantly lower among girls compared with boys in our study, in line with most other studies [14,15,18,19,22-26]. In contrast to these results, some studies found no significant difference be- tween the sexes in mean levels of vitamin D [6,16,21,26,27]. Al-Taiar et al. supposed that an indoor lifestyle might be more common in girls and may exacerbate vitamin D defi- ciency [24]. Taking into account this sex disparity, improving vitamin D levels among adolescents should focus on girls by supporting safe sunlight exposure and/or intake of vitamin D-rich foods and supplements [24]. We found lower mean vitamin D levels in children who wore traditional clothing. Vitamin D status was affected by a covered style of dress that prevented exposure to direct sun- light [4,10,14]. Vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency were found more common among Turkish adolescent girls, par- ticularly those wearing concealing clothing [28]. In Sherief et al study among healthy Egyptian adolescents, all females were wearing hijabs and all had vitamin D deficiency [8,14]. Original Article | Dermatol Pract Concept. 2023;13(3):e2023190 7 reported in self-reports of these behaviors in questionnaires and intervention research [40]. In conclusion, keeping the risk of sunburn and skin can- cer in mind, children should benefit from the sun adequately during the winter. Special attention should be given to girls and adolescents because they have more vitamin D inade- quacy and deficiency. Vitamin D supplementation should be given to children, especially during winter. Further studies including vitamin D measurements from various cities and all seasons are required to clarify the effects of sun-protective behaviors on vitamin D levels. References 1. Nair R, Maseeh A. Vitamin D: The “sunshine” vitamin. J Phar- macol Pharmacother. 2012;3(2):118-126. DOI: 10.4103/0976- 500X.95506. PMID: 22629085. PMCID: PMC3356951. 2. Ramasamy I. Vitamin D metabolism and guidelines for vitamin D supplementation. Clin Biochem Rev. 2020;41(3):103-126. DOI: 10.33176/AACB-20-00006. PMID: 33343045 PMCID: PMC7731935 3. Holick MF, Matsuoka LY, Wortsman J. Regular use of sunscreen on vitamin D levels. Arch Dermatol. 1995;31(11):1337-1339. DOI: 10.1001/archderm.131.11.1337. PMID: 7503584.. 4. Alpdemir M, Alpdemir MF. Vitamin D deficiency status in Tur- key: A meta-analysis. Int J Med Biochem. 2019;2:118-131. DOI: 10.14744/ijmb.2019.04127 5. Kannan S, Lim HW. Photoprotection and vitamin D: a re- view. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2014;30 (2-3):137-145. DOI: 10.1111/phpp.12096. PMID: 24313629. 6. Feketea GM, Bocsan IC, Tsiros G, Voila P, Stanciu LA, Zdrenghea M. Vitamin D status in children in Greece and its relationship with sun- screen application. Children (Basel). 2021;8 (2):111. DOI: 10.3390 /children8020111. PMID: 33562659. PMCID: PMC7914486. 7. Holick MF. Sunlight, UV radiation, vitamin D, and skin cancer: how much sunlight do we need? Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1268: 19-36. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-46227-7_2. PMID: 32918212. 8. Wacker M, Holick MF. Sunlight and Vitamin D: A global per- spective for health. Dermatoendocrinol. 2013;5:5(1):51-108. DOI: 10.4161/derm.24494. PMID: 24494042. PMCID: PMC3897598. 9. Norval M, Wulf HC. Does chronic sunscreen use reduce vitamin D production to insufficient levels? Br J Dermatol. 2009;161 (4):732-736. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09332.x. PMID: 19663879. 10. Hansen L, Tjønneland A, Køster B, et al. Sun exposure guidelines and serum vitamin D status in Denmark: The StatusD Study. Nutrients. 2016;8 (5):266. DOI: 10.3390/nu8050266. PMID: 27164133. PMCID: PMC4882679. 11. Neale RE, Khan SR, Lucas RM, Waterhouse M, Whiteman DC, Olsen CM. The effect of sunscreen on vitamin D: a review. Br J Dermatol. 2019;181: (5):907-915. DOI: 10.1111/bjd.17980. PMID: 30945275. 12. Fitzpatrick TB. The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol. 1988;124: (6):869-871. DOI: 10.1001/archderm.124.6.869. PMID: 3377516. 13. Munns CF, Shaw N, Kiely M, et al. Global consensus recommen- dations on prevention and management of nutritional rickets. showed that 1,25(OH)2D levels did not change significantly in either the sunscreen user group or the control groups with the season of the year. Serum 25(OH)D concentrations in winter decreased by 17–40% in sunscreen users and by 31–35% in the controls. The use of sunscreen was not asso- ciated with vitamin D deficiency even when analyses were restricted to adult subjects using sunscreens with SPF >15 or SPF >30 [29]. Some studies showed that the use of oral vitamin D supplements was associated with higher vitamin D levels compared with sunlight exposure [38,39]. Most (65%) observational studies found no association between sunscreen and vitamin D concentration [33]. Results from existing trials and observational studies support the low risk. In this current study, children who used sunscreens had low adequate vitamin D levels. In the sunscreen users group, SPF, product source, season, and body areas were not related to vitamin D status. Mortensen et al [31] found a tendency towards a negative effect on serum 25(OH)D with the use of sunscreen having SPF ≥30, which became significant with parental education or week of measurement. Contrary to our results, Feketea et al [6] found higher vitamin D levels in children who used sunscreens than in those who did not. Pulungan et al [27] showed that more healthy children from 7-12 years of age in the vitamin D sufficient group did not use sunscreen (59 versus 27, P = 0.02), but this finding was inconsistent with their multivariate analysis. Several longitu- dinal studies of sunscreen users and controls showed similar end-of-summer levels of vitamin D, indicating that infre- quent sunscreen use or sufficient amounts of UVB passed the sunscreen barrier and/or unprotected skin parts might also contribute to this result [30]. The measurement times of vita- min D levels in winter months may play a role in low vitamin D levels regardless of the sunscreen use details in this study. Because it is thought that visiting seaside towns to swim in summer may affect the sun exposure time, this question was asked of participants. No relationship was found be- tween visiting seaside towns and vitamin D levels. Some studies showed that the duration of time spent under the sun was longer in children with vitamin D sufficiency [23,27]. Outdoor physical activity and/or total time spent out- side were not questioned in the present study, which may affect vitamin D levels. In a study, autumn vitamin D status in 4–8-year-old Danish children was associated with phys- ical activity habits [31]. Seasonal changes for vitamin D levels that allow seasonal comparisons were not researched in this study. Seeking shade, one of the recommended sun protection behaviors in guidelines, was not questioned of the families. Staying in the shade was found to be related to lower vitamin D status [29]. The sunscreen use details and sun protection behaviors were evaluated according to the self-reports of parents. However, validation of self-reported sun protection habits has been evaluated and confidence was 8 Original Article | Dermatol Pract Concept. 2023;13(3):e2023190 children in Indonesia, a sun-rich country. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2021;26 (2):92-98. DOI: 10.6065/apem.2040132.066. PMID: 33412749. PMCID: PMC8255856. 28. Hatun S, Islam O, Cizmecioglu F, et al. Subclinical vitamin D deficiency is increased in adolescent girls who wear conceal- ing clothing. J Nutr. 2005;135: (2):218-222. DOI: 10.1093 /jn/135.2.218. PMID: 15671216. 29. Linos E, Keiser E, Kanzler M, et al. Sun protective behaviors and vitamin D levels in the US population: NHANES 2003-2006. Cancer Causes Control. 2012;23: (1):133-140. DOI: 10.1007 /s10552-011-9862-0. PMID: 22045154. PMCID: PMC3718293. 30. Wulf HC, Philipsen PA. Improving photoprotection and im- plications for 25(OH)D formation. Anticancer Res. 2020;40: (1):511-518. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13979. PMID: 31892606. 31. Mortensen C, Mølgaard C, Hauger H, Kristensen M, Dams- gaard CT. Sun behaviour and physical activity associated with autumn vitamin D status in 4-8-year-old Danish children. Public Health Nutr. 2018;21 (17):3158-3167. DOI: 10.1017 /S1368980018002094. PMID: 30189911. 32. Whiteman DC, Neale RE, Aitken J, et al; Sunscreen Summit Pol- icy Group. When to apply sunscreen: a consensus statement for Australia and New Zealand. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2019;43: (2):171-175. DOI: 10.1111/1753-6405.12873. PMID: 30681231. 33. Matsuoka LY, Ide L, Wortsman J, MacLaughlin JA, Holick MF. Sunscreens suppress cutaneous vitamin D3 synthesis. J Clin En- docrinol Metab. 1987;64 (6):1165-1168. DOI: 10.1210/jcem- 64-6-1165. PMID: 3033008. 34. Matsuoka LY, Wortsman J, Hanifan N, Holick MF. Chronic sunscreen use decreases circulating concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D: a preliminary study. Arch Dermatol. 1988;124: (12):1802-1804. PMID: 3190255. 35. Matsuoka LY, Wortsman J, Hollis BW. Use of topical sunscreen for the evaluation of regional synthesis of vitamin D3. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990;22: (5 Pt 1):772-775. DOI: 10.1016/0190- 9622(90)70107-s. PMID: 2161436. 36. Marks R, Foley PA, Jolley D, Knight KR, Harrison J, Thompson SC. The effect of regular sunscreen use on vitamin D levels in an Australian population. Results of a randomized controlled trial. Arch Dermatol. 1995;1311(4):415-421. PMID: 7726582. 37. Farrerons J, Barnadas M, Rodríguez J, et al. Clinically pre- scribed sunscreen (sun protection factor 15) does not decrease serum vitamin D concentration sufficiently either to induce changes in parathyroid function or in metabolic markers. Br J Dermatol. 1998;139 (3):422-427. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365- 2133.1998.02405.x. PMID: 9767286. 38. Reid SM, Robinson M, Kerr AC, Ibbotson SH. Prevalence and predictors of low vitamin D status in patients referred to a tertiary photodiagnostic service: a retrospective study. Photo- dermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2012;28 (2):91-96.DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0781.2011.00644.x. PMID: 22409712. 39. Cho SH, Yun JM, Lee JE, Lee H, Joh HK, Cho B. Comparison of two strategies to increase serum vitamin D levels in a real-world setting: Sunlight exposure and oral supplementation. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 2021;67: (6):384-390. DOI: 10.3177 /jnsv.67.384. PMID: 34980716. 40. O’Riordan DL, Nehl E, Gies P, et al. Validity of covering-up sun-protection habits: Association of observations and self-report. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;60 (5):739-744. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2008.12.015. 17. PMID: 19278750. PMCID: PMC3715114. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101:, (2):394-415. DOI: 10.1210/ jc.2015-2175. PMID: 26745253. PMCID: PMC4880117. 14. Sherief LM, Ali A, Gaballa A, et al. Vitamin D status and healthy Egyptian adolescents: Where do we stand? Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100:(29):e26661. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026661. PMID: 34398026. PMCID: PMC8294863. 15. Meral G, Güven A, Uslu A, et al. The prevalence of vitamin D de- ficiency in children, adolescents and adults in a sample of Turkish population. Ethno Med. 2016;10:249-254. DOI:10.1080/09735 070.2016.11905494. 16. Hocaoğlu-Emre FS, Sarıbal D, Oğuz O. Vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency according to the current criteria for children: Vitamin D status of elementary school children in Turkey. J Clin Res Pe- diatr Endocrinol. 2019;11:(2):181-188. DOI: 10.4274/jcrpe.gale- nos.2018.2018.0272. PMID: 30592191. PMCID: PMC6571535. 17. Accessed on 01 May 2023 from: https://mgm.gov.tr/veride- gerlendirme/il-ve-ilceler-istatistik.aspx?k=A 18. Türe E, Müderrisoğlu S, Acı R, Çubukçu M, Arslanbek Erdem M. Evaluation of vitamin D levels in adolescents, and children according to age, sex, and seasonal characteristics. Ankara Med J. 2020;2:380-6. DOI: 10.5505/amj.2020.70893. 19. Byun EJ, Heo J, Cho SH, Lee JD, Kim HS. Suboptimal vitamin D status in Korean adolescents: a nationwide study on its prev- alence, risk factors including cotinine-verified smoking status and association with atopic dermatitis and asthma. BMJ Open. 2017;7: (7):e016409. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016409. PMID: 28698345. PMCID: PMC5541452. 20. Gordon CM, DePeter KC, Feldman HA, Grace E, Emans SJ. Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among healthy adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158 (6):531-537. DOI: 10.1001 /archpedi.158.6.531. PMID: 15184215. 21. Vierucci F, Del Pistoia M, Fanos M, et al. Vitamin D status and predictors of hypovitaminosis D in Italian children and adolescents: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Pediatr. 2013;172: (12):1607-1617. DOI: 10.1007/s00431-013-2119-z. PMID: 23959324. 22. Yao TC, Tu YL, Chang SW, et al; PATCH study group, Huang JL. Suboptimal vitamin D status in a population-based study of Asian children: prevalence and relation to allergic diseases and atopy. PLoS One. 2014;9: (6):e99105. DOI: 10.1371/journal. pone.0099105. PMID: 24892430. PMCID: PMC4043968. 23. Bener A, Al-Ali M, Hoffmann GF. Vitamin D deficiency in healthy children in a sunny country: associated factors. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2009;60: Suppl 5:60-70. DOI: 10.1080/09637480802400487. PMID: 18946796. 24. Al-Taiar A, Rahman A, Al-Sabah R, Shaban L, Al-Harbi A. Vitamin D status among adolescents in Kuwait: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2018;8: (7):e021401. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021401. PMID: 30068613. PMCID: PMC6074625. 25. Manios Y, Moschonis G, Hulshof T, et al. Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency among schoolchildren in Greece: The role of sex, degree of urbanisation and seasonality. Br J Nutr. 2017;118: (7):550-558. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114517002422. PMID: 28965512. 26. Gordon CM, DePeter KC, Feldman HA, Grace E, Emans SJ. Prev- alence of vitamin D deficiency among healthy adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158: (6):531-537. DOI: 10.1001 /archpedi.158.6.531. PMID: 15184215. 27. Pulungan A, Soesanti F, Tridjaja B, Batubara J. Vitamin D in- sufficiency and its contributing factors in primary school-aged