DR [Dermatology Reports 2011; 3:e14] [page 33] Bacterial colonization of psoriasis plaques. Is it relevant? Eva Marcus, Diana Demmler, Andreas Rudolph, Matthias Fischer Department of Dermatology and Venerology, HELIOS Klinikum Aue, Aue, Germany Abstract Bacterial colonization was investigated ret- rospectively in patients with plaque psoriasis (n=98 inpatient treatments, n=73 patients). At least one pathogen was found in 46% of all cases. Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequent bacterium. Bacterial colonization of psoriasis plaques could be relevant in individ- ual cases. The exacerbation of Psoriasis vulgaris can be caused by various triggers.1 While bacterial infiltration of afflicted skin is known to be a trigger factor in chronic inflammatory der- matoses such as atopic dermatitis,2 the bacter- ial flora of psoriasis plaques and their possible importance have received only little attention thus far. The bacterial smears of lesional skin per- formed routinely on admission to our clinic were examined retrospectively for all psoriasis patients. The observation period was 16 months. The data of n=98 inpatient treatments (n=73 patients) were assessed, whereby n=56 patients were treated once, n=12 patients twice and n=5 patients underwent repeated in- patient treatments. Overall, n=45 (46% of all psoriasis cases) had colonization of the psori- asis plaques with pathogenic bacteria, where- by gram-positive bacteria were found most fre- quently (Figure 1). Of these patients with pathogenic colonization, n=22 had one pathogen, while n=18 of those examined had two bacteria and n=5 three or four different bacteria. Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus agalactiae, Enterococcus faecalis, Klebsiella pneumoniae and oxytoca, Acinetobacter baumannii, Proteus mirabilis, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Serratia marcescens, Acinetobacter lwoffii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli were identified as pathogenic bacteria. The most prevalent bacterium was Staphylococcus aureus (n=31). Clinically, the plaques covered with pathological bacterial flora were in part erosive. The PASI on admission for patients with pathological colonization was 16.1 versus 14.0 in patients without proof of bacterial colo- nization or resident flora (not significant (t- Test)). The patients admitted two or more times showed a change in bacterial coloniza- tion in eleven cases without any regular pat- tern. There was a change between gram-posi- tive and gram-negative colonization, as well as new colonization of previously-sterile plaques with various pathogenic bacteria. However, in three cases, colonization with Staphylococcus aureus was no longer present on re-admission (sterile finding in each case). These three patients did not receive any antimicrobial treatment between their in-house treatments. One woman developed erysipelas of the abdominal wall out of a navel plaque with colo- nization by Staphylococcus aureus (Figure 2). Nearly half of the patients examined had colonization of the psoriasis plaques with (potentially) pathogenic bacteria. Examina - tions to date of the bacterial flora in psoriasis have concentrated on the proof of Staphylo - coccus aureus and found a prevalence of up to 64% in lesional skin of patients with plaque psoriasis.3,4 Corresponding to this, Staphylo - coccus aureus has also been found as the most prevalent bacterium in patients with superin- fected pustular psoriasis.5 The frequency of 46% bacterial colonization in the group we examined was lower than that reported in the literature, but it showed a considerably broad- er spectrum of pathogens, especially including gram-negative bacteria. In most patients, the pathogens appear as (transient) colonization or superinfection. This is supported by the lack of difference in the PASI scores on admission and the chang- ing flora in patients admitted more than once. Nonetheless, bacterial colonization may have systemic and local effects. For example a superantigen effect has been described in pso- riasis especially for Staphylococcus aureus, the most-frequently found bacterium.3,4 Enterotoxins seem to play an important role in this superantigen activity.4 Moreover, trigger- ing of psoriasis by Streptococci is known.1,6 On the other hand, local effects on single colo- nized plaques might be possible, since the clinical picture with crusting and erosive sur- face indicates an immunoresponse. Local infections of psoriasis plaques are usually pre- vented by high concentrations of antimicrobial peptides.7 Nonetheless this barrier seems to be breached in single cases. In the group of patients we examined, one woman developed erysipelas which began clinically in the area of a psoriasis plaque. This shows that systemic infections from local bacterial colonization could not be prevented in individual cases in spite of an overexpressed innate immune sys- tem in psoriasis. Additional investigations are needed to bet- ter estimate the clinical relevance of coloniza- tion and potential breaches of the innate immune system in psoriasis patients. Dermatology Reports 2011; volume 3:e14 Correspondence: Matthias Fischer, HELIOS- Klinikum Aue, Department of Dermatology and Venerology, Gartenstraße 6, D-08280 Aue, Germany. E-mail: matthias.fischer@helios-kliniken.de Key words: psoriasis, bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus, trigger. Conflict of interest: the authors report no con- flicts of interest. Received for publication: 8 June 2011. Accepted for publication: 12 july 2011. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY- NC 3.0). ©Copyright E. Marcus et al., 2011 Licensee PAGEPress, Italy Dermatology Reports 2011; 3:e14 doi:10.4081/dr.2011.e14 Figure 1. Distribution of bacterial infec- tion of psoriasis plaques. Mix= Combination of gram-positive and gram- negative pathogens. Figure 2. Erysipelas of the abdominal wall starting from an umbilical psoriasis plaque with proof of Staphylococcus aureus. No n- co mm er cia l u se on ly [page 34] [Dermatology Reports 2011; 3:e14] References 1. Schön MP, Boehncke WH. Psoriasis. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1899-912. 2. Brook I. Secondary bacterial infections complicating skin lesions. J Med Microbiol 2002;51:808-12. 3. Balci DD, Duran N, Ozer B, et al. High prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus culti- vation and superantigen production in patients with psoriasis. Eur J Dermatol 2009;19:238-42. 4. Tomi NS, Kränke B, Aberer E. Staphylococcal toxins in patients with pso- riasis, atopic dermatitis, and erythroder- ma, and in healthy control subjects. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005;53:67-72. 5. Brook I, Frazier EH, Yeager JK. Microbiology of infected pustular psoriasis lesions. Int J Dermatol 1999;38:579-81. 6. Herbst RA, Hoch O, Kapp A, et al. Guttate psoriasis triggered by perianal streptococ- cal dermatitis in a four-year-old boy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000;42:885-7. 7. Harder J, Schröder JM. Psoriatic scales: a promising source for the isolation of human skin-derived antimicrobial pro- teins. J Leukoc Biol 2005;77:476-86. Case Report No n- co mm er cia l u se on ly