DR [page 4] [Dermatology Reports 2018; 10:7660] Clinical evaluation of Morgellons disease in a cohort of North American patients Melissa C. Fesler,1 Marianne J. Middelveen,2 Raphael B. Stricker1 1Union Square Medical Associates, San Francisco, CA, USA; 2Atkins Veterinary Services, Calgary, AB, Canada Abstract Morgellons disease (MD) is a dermato- logical condition characterized by aberrant production of keratin and collagen fibers in skin. Although infection with Borrelia burgdorferi, the causative agent of Lyme disease (LD), has been associated with MD, relatively few studies have hitherto provid- ed epidemiological evidence regarding this association. A cohort of 1000 seropositive North American LD patients was evaluated for the presence of MD. Patients were diag- nosed with MD based on detection of microscopic fibers in skin lesions or under unbroken skin. Demographic and clinical features of MD patients were analyzed, and laboratory testing for tickborne coinfections and other infectious agents, was performed. Subjective and objective features of MD were analyzed using statistical methods. Of 1000 seropositive LD patients, 60 (6%) were diagnosed with MD. Of these 60 patients, 75% were female and 78% pre- sented in the late disseminated stage of MD. All 60 patients (100%) were seropositive for B. burgdorferi infection. Tickborne coinfections in these patients included Babesia spp (62%), Bartonella and Rickettsia (25% each), Ehrlichia (15%) and Anaplasma (10%). Helicobacter pylori was detected in 12% of MD patients. In all, 77% of MD patients had one or more coinfec- tions. This study confirms recent findings that MD occurs in a limited subset of LD patients. The clinical and genetic determi- nants of MD in LD patients require further study. Introduction Morgellons disease (MD) is a dermato- logical condition characterized clinically by the presence of multicolored microscopic fibers in skin lesions or lying under unbro- ken skin.1-7 The disease is associated with overproduction of keratin and collagen in cutaneous tissue. Historically, MD has been misclassified as a delusional disorder due to its sometimes bizarre symptomatology in patients who present with claims of colorful fibers or parasites protruding from or crawl- ing within the dermis. In contrast, recent peer reviewed publications demonstrate that MD is a true somatic illness associated with Borrelia infection, and not a delusional dis- order.1-7 Other studies have shown that a similar dermopathy occurs in cattle and dogs, providing further evidence that MD is a dermatological condition associated with spirochetal infection.8,9 The spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi is the etiologic agent of Lyme disease (LD). According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), there are more than 300,000 newly diagnosed cases of LD each year in the USA,10 making it the fastest growing epidemic of our time.11 LD is twice as common as breast cancer,12 six times more common than HIV/AIDS,13 20 times more common than hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection,14 and 30 times more com- mon than tuberculosis in the USA.15 Unfortunately, a large number of LD cases go either undiagnosed or misdiagnosed, resulting in chronic infection and potential complications associated with the tickborne disease, including MD.6,16 Although previous studies have shown a strong clinical association between LD and MD,2,3,5-7 few studies have provided epidemiological data for MD. Recently, Mayne evaluated a cohort of Australian patients and found that 6% of seropositive Lyme patients were positive for MD based on skin microscopy.17 This publication was the first to provide an epidemiological assessment of MD as related to LD. To date, there are no similar studies regarding the prevalence of MD in North America. Other studies have implicated tickborne coinfec- tions and Helicobacter pylori infection in the etiology of MD.18,19 The present study is the first to analyze the prevalence and clinical characteristics of MD in a cohort of North American patients with LD drawn from a single med- ical practice. Materials and Methods Patients and data collection Patients were recruited from a medical practice located in San Francisco, CA, spe- cializing in the diagnosis and treatment of tickborne diseases. All patients were resi- dents of North America. Informed consent for data collection was obtained from each patient, and the anonymous data collection protocol was approved by the Western Institutional Review Board (WIRB), Puyallup, WA. Patients were included in the study if they met the diagnostic criteria for MD through identification of fibers visible in skin lesions or under unbroken skin using a hand-held microscope, as previously described.1-6 MD classification based on the duration of disease (early versus late) and the extent of skin involvement (localized versus disseminated) was performed as pre- viously described.5 All subjects were required to have LD testing and tickborne coinfection testing through a single laboratory, and they were required to have repeat testing to confirm the diagnosis of LD. Prior antibiotic treat- ment was not an excluding factor. Subjective data including a thorough histo- ry was obtained during the initial patient encounter. Objective data including physi- cal findings and laboratory testing was col- lected during each patient visit and through various laboratories. Laboratory assessment Testing for tickborne diseases was per- formed through IGeneX Laboratory in Palo Alto, CA. IGeneX is a high-complexity testing laboratory that has Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) certification. Seropositivity for LD and tickborne coinfections was based on Dermatology Reports 2018; volume 10:7660 Correspondence: Raphael B. Stricker, 450 Sutter Street, Suite 1504, San Francisco, CA 94108 USA. Tel.: 415.399.1035 - Fax: 415.399.1057. E-mail: rstricker@usmamed.com Key words: Morgellons disease; Lyme dis- ease; Borrelia burgdorferi; Spirochetes; Dermopathy; Borrelial dermatitis. Acknowledgements: the authors thank our patients for participating in the study. We also thank Dr. Jae Brodsky for statistical analysis. Funding: supported in part by a grant from the Lindorf Family Foundation, Newark, OH, USA. Conflict of interests: the authors declare no conflict of interests. Received for publication: 27 February 2018. Accepted for publication: 16 March 2018. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). ©Copyright M.C. Fesler et al., 2018 Licensee PAGEPress, Italy Dermatology Reports 2018; 10:7660 doi:10.4081/dr.2018.7660 No n- co mm er cia l u se on ly [Dermatology Reports 2018; 10:7660] [page 5] standard laboratory interpretation criteria, as previously described.20 Serological test- ing for Helicobacter pylori infection was performed through various laboratories using standard assays.21 To evaluate companion diagnostic fea- tures of tickborne diseases, CD57 natural killer (NK) cell subset testing was per- formed by Bioreference Laboratories (Elmwood Park, NJ) or LabCorp, Inc. (Burlington, NC).22 Testing for complement protein C4a, a marker of inflammation, was performed by National Jewish Health Laboratory in Denver, CO.23 Low CD57 NK cells and elevated C4a levels are com- mon in LD patients.22,23 Statistical analysis was performed using R statistical software version 3.2.5 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). The Student t-test was used for parametric variables and the Pearson correlation coefficient r was used for non-parametric variables. Results A total of 1000 patients (665 females and 335 males) who were residents of North America and seropositive for LD were screened for the study. Patients ranged in age from 22 months to 93 years. Of this total, 62 were diagnosed with MD. Two patients were excluded from the study. One subject never returned after the first visit and the other never received follow-up test- ing, although the subject tested positive for tickborne coinfections. A total of 60 patients were included for data analysis. MD tended to be more common in women, with a 3:1 female-to-male ratio (P=0.001), as shown in Table 1. The median age of MD patients was 52 years, with an age range of 26-75 years, as shown in Figure 1, and there was no statistical differ- ence in age between men and women (P=0.2), as shown in Figure 2. More than three-quarters of MD patients (78%) were diagnosed with late disseminated MD at presentation, as shown in Table 2, and the most common patient symptoms are shown in Table 3. The three most common symp- toms were musculoskeletal pain, fatigue and insomnia; the next most common were cognitive impairment and depression, fol- lowed by hypothyroidism, anxiety and neu- ropathy. Coinfection testing to evaluate other Article Table 1. Sex of MD patients. MD was more common in women with a 3:1 female-to- male ratio (P=0.001). Sex Number (n) Percent (%) Female 45 75 Male 15 25 Table 2. Clinical classification of MD patients based on Reference 5. MD Number Percent Classification (n) (%) Early localized MD 5 8 Early disseminated MD 4 7 Late localized MD 4 7 Late disseminated MD 47 78 Table 3. Symptoms noted in MD patients. Symptoms Number Percent (n) (%) Musculoskeletal symptoms 56 93 Fatigue 53 88 Insomnia 48 80 Cognitive impairment 30 50 Depression 30 50 Hypothyroidism 20 33 Anxiety 20 33 Neuropathy 20 33 Figure 1. Age of MD patient cohort. Each bar represents a two-year span. Frequency rep- resents the number of individuals who fall within the reported two-year span. The median age was 52 years with a range of 26 to 75 years. Figure 2. Sex versus age in MD patient cohort. Wings represent the age range for men and women. Each box represents the standard deviation for each sex. Bars represent the mean age for each sex. There was no statistical difference in age between men and women (P=0.2). The female patients (mean: 51.2 years) had a tendency to be slightly older than the male patients (47.9 years). The standard deviations of the two groups were similar (12.2 years and 14.4 years) and the shape of their distributions were of similar symmetry. A two-sample t-test with an alternative hypothesis of the male mean less than the female mean had a t-statistic of 0.7942 and P-value of 0.218 (21 degrees of freedom). No n- co mm er cia l u se on ly infectious agents in the etiology of MD was performed on all patients, and the docu- mented coinfections are listed in Table 4. In our 60 MD patients, 30 (50%) were seropositive for Babesia duncani, 7 (12%) for Babesia microti, 15 (25%) for Bartonella henselae, 15 (25%) for Rickettsia spp., 9 (15%) for Ehrlichia, 6 (10%) for Anaplasma, and 7 (12%) were seropositive for Helicobacter pylori. While 23% of MD patients had no coinfection, 33% had a single coinfection and 44% had multiple coinfections (Table 5). Examination of companion diagnostic tick- borne disease testing in the MD cohort revealed that 66% had decreased CD57 NK cells and 33% had increased C4a levels. A lower CD57 NK level correlated with a higher C4a inflammatory marker level in a non-linear manner (r=0.02), as shown in Figure 3. Discussion According to the CDC, approximately 329,000 cases of LD are diagnosed each year in the USA (10). In our cohort of North American LD patients, we found that 6% had MD (Table 1). Based on these numbers, there may be at least 19,740 annual cases of MD in the USA (MD prevalence = 6%; MD incidence =19,740). Considering cumula- tive rates of LD over the past 20 years, there may be approximately 5,304,500 total cases of LD in the USA, corresponding to a total of at least 318,270 cases of MD. At this rate, and as a reference, MD is slightly more common than HCV infection, 1.5 times more common than pediatric cancer and almost three times more common than amy- otrophic lateral sclerosis in the USA.14,24,25 Patients were more likely to present with late disseminated MD in our cohort (Table 2), and systemic symptoms that often accompany LD were common (Table 3). Many of these symptoms tended to precede the onset of MD skin lesions. Tickborne coinfections including Babesia spp (62%), Bartonella and Rickettsia (25% each), Ehrlichia (15%) and Anaplasma (10%) were found in patients with MD (Table 4), and Helicobacter pylori infection was detected in 12% of MD patients. More than three-quarters of patients had at least one coinfection (Table 5), and it is unclear if these coinfections serve as a trigger or exac- erbate the condition. Studies have found Helicobacter pylori and Bartonella in tissue biopsies of MD patients,18,19 and further studies are needed to investigate the role of coinfections in MD severity and presenta- tion. Our study confirms that there is a greater tendency for women to develop MD, and the 3:1 female predominance exceeds the 2:1 female predominance of LD in our cohort.2,26 Savely and Stricker2 previ- ously showed that women are more likely to develop this dermopathy in conjunction with LD, reflecting the fact that certain dis- ease processes may be recognized more fre- quently in women due to an exaggerated response to infection.26 Women also tend to be more meticulous with dermatologic care, and increased awareness of skin changes could account for a female predominance of the disease. Genetic factors may also play a role in MD. Preliminary genetic studies have demonstrated nine genes with signifi- cant sequence variation in MD patients (Sapi E, University of New Haven, unpub- lished observation 2017). There was no dif- ference in age at presentation between men and women, although men tended to present at a slightly younger age (Figures 1 and 2). As noted above, patients were more likely to present with late disseminated MD (Table 2). Since MD apparently represents a dermatopathological spectrum associated with LD, it is possible that many individuals do not realize they have the dermatological condition until later in its course, when more symptoms are present and/or more skin lesions appear. As in the case of LD, few practitioners diagnose and treat MD, and patients may have a difficult time obtaining treatment during the early stages of the disease.27 Consequently, there may be a greater tendency to seek medical care only after the disease worsens. Future studies are required to evaluate and confirm MD epidemiological data obtained in this study. Larger sample sizes should be examined and direct methodolo- gy such as culture, immunohistochemistry and molecular testing, should be performed to confirm the tickborne disease etiology of Article Figure 3. CD57 NK versus C4a levels in MD patient cohort. Established normal range for the CD57 NK subset is 60-360 cells/uL. Established normal C4a level is <2830 ng/mL. A lower CD57 NK level correlated with a higher C4a inflammatory marker level in a non- linear manner (r=0.02) for this cohort. Table 4. Variety of coinfections found in MD patients. Infection Number Percent (n) (%) Borrelia burgdorferi 60 100 Babesia duncani 30 50 Babesia microti 7 12 Bartonella henselae 15 25 Rickettsia spp. 15 25 Ehrlichia 9 15 Anaplasma 6 10 Helicobacter pylori 7 12 Table 5. Number of coinfections in MD patients. Coinfections Number Percent (n) (%) 0 14 23 1 20 33 2 18 30 3 4 7 4 4 7 [page 6] [Dermatology Reports 2018; 10:7660] No n- co mm er cia l u se on ly [Dermatology Reports 2018; 10:7660] [page 7] MD. Furthermore, genetic susceptibility for MD should be evaluated, and additional animal studies in dogs, cattle and other models should be conducted to determine the prevalence of MD in association with spirochetal infection and genetic factors in animal and human populations. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first study that documents the prevalence and clinical characteristics of MD in North American patients. The study confirms recent findings that MD occurs in a limited subset of LD patients, and other tickborne coinfections were inconsistently associated with MD. The clinical and genetic determinants of MD in LD patients require further study. References 1. Savely VR, Leitao MM, Stricker RB. The mystery of Morgellons disease: infection or delusion. Am J Clin Dermatol 2006;7:1-5. 2. Savely VR, Stricker RB. Morgellons disease: Analysis of a population with clinically confirmed microscopic sub- cutaneous fibers of unknown etiology. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 2010;3:67-78. 3. Middelveen MJ, Burugu D, Poruri A, et. al. Association of spirochetal infec- tion with Morgellons disease. F1000Res 2013;2:25. 4. Harvey WT, Bransfield RC, Mercer DE, et al. Morgellons disease, illumi- nating an undefined illness: a case series. J Med Case Rep 2009;3:8243. 5. Middelveen MJ, Bandoski C, Burke J, et. al. Exploring the association between Morgellons disease and Lyme disease: identification of Borrelia burgdorferi in Morgellons disease patients. BMC Dermatol 2015;15:1. 6. Middelveen MJ, Stricker RB. Morgellons disease: a filamentous bor- relial dermatitis. Int J Gen Med 2016;9:349-54. 7. Middelveen MJ, Fesler MC, Stricker RB. History of Morgellons disease: from delusion to definition. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 2018;11:71- 90. 8. Middelveen MJ, Stricker RB. Filament formation associated with spirochetal infection: a comparative approach to Morgellons disease. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 2011;4:167-77. 9. Middelveen MJ, Rotaru GM, McMurray JL, et al. Canine filamentous dermatitis associated with Borrelia infection. J Vet Sci Med Diagn 2016;5:6. 10. CDC. How many people get Lyme dis- ease? Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/lyme/stats/human- cases.html Accessed: March 30, 2017. 11. Stricker RB, Middelveen MJ. Sexual transmission of Lyme disease: challeng- ing the tickborne disease paradigm. Expert Rev Anti Ther 2015;13:1303-6. 12. CDC. Breast cancer statistics. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/ cancer/breast/statistics/ Accessed: March 30, 2017. 13. CDC. HIV in the United States: at a glance. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/over view/ataglance.html Accessed: March 30, 2017. 14. CDC. Viral hepatitis: Statistics & sur- veillance. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/hepatitis/statis- tics/. Accessed: March 30, 2017. 15. CDC. Tuberculosis (TB). Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/tb/statistics/ Accessed: March 30, 2017. 16. Stricker RB, Johnson L. Lyme disease: the promise of Big Data, companion diagnostics and precision medicine. Infect Drug Resist 2016;9:215-9. 17. Mayne PJ. Clinical determinants of Lyme borreliosis, babesiosis, bartonel- losis, anaplasmosis and ehrlichiosis in an Australian cohort. Int J Gen Med 2014;8:15. 18. Bandoski C. Evidence for the presence of human pathogens Borrelia and Helicobacter in Morgellons patients’ skin samples. Presented at: 7th Annual Medical-Scientific Conference on Morgellons Disease; March 29-30, 2014; Austin, TX. Available from: http://www.thecehf. org/cheryl-bandos- ki.html Accessed: September 30, 2016. 19. Allen L, Saylor-Hefley C. Morgellons under investigation: identification of associated microorganisms by molecu- lar analysis of epithelial samples. Presented at: 7th Annual Medical- Scientific Conference on Morgellons Disease; March 29–30, 2014; Austin, TX. Available from: http://www.thece- hf.org/resources/OSU%20_2015%20_ Research.pdf Accessed: September 30, 2016. 20. Shah JS, Du Cruz I, Narciso W, Lo W, Harris NS. Improved sensitivity of Lyme disease Western blots prepared with a mixture of Borrelia burgdorferi strains 297 and B31. Chronic Dis Int 2014;1:7. 21. She RC, Wilson AR, Litwin CM. Evaluation of Helicobacter pylori immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgA, and IgM serologic testing compared to stool anti- gen testing. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2009;16:1253-5. 22. Stricker RB, Winger EE. Decreased CD57 lymphocyte subset in patients with chronic Lyme disease. Immunol Lett 2001;76:43-8. 23. Stricker RB, Savely VR, Motanya NC, Giclas PC. Complement split products C3a and C4a in chronic Lyme disease. Scand J Immunol 2009;69:64-9. 24. National Cancer Institute. Childhood cancers. Available from: https://www.cancer.gov/types/child- hood-cancers Accessed: October 30, 2017. 25. CDC. Prevalence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis — United States, 2012–2013. Surveillance Summaries 2016; 65:1–12. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/6 5/ss/ss6508a1.htm. Accessed October 30, 2017. 26. Stricker RB, Johnson L. Gender bias in chronic Lyme disease. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009;18:1717-8. 27. Johnson L, Aylward A, Stricker RB. Health care access and burden of care for patients with Lyme disease: a large United States survey. Health Policy. 2011;102:64–71. Article No n- co mm er cia l u se on ly