2018 Vol. 11 No. 1 NIDCAP Federation International (NFI) Founded in 2001, the NFI is an international, non-profit membership organization. The NFI encourages highly attuned implementation of the Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP) for all intensive, special care and newborn nurseries around the world. The NFI serves as the authoritative leader for research, development, and dissemination of NIDCAP, and for the certification of trainers, healthcare professionals, and nurseries in the NIDCAP approach. Developmental Observer The Official Newsletter of the NIDCAP® Federation International “When I approach a child, [the child] inspires in me two sentiments – tenderness for what [the child] is and respect for what [the child] may become.” Louis Pasteur NIDCAP Trainers Meeting Abstract Edition Dear Readers, Welcome to the Third Abstract Edition of the Developmental Observer. In this issue, we publish the abstracts presented at our 28th Annual NIDCAP Trainers Meeting in Ed- monton, Canada, October 21-24, 2017. The peer review process led by NIDCAP Trainer Linda Lacina, MSN, RN, HN-BC selected abstracts for presentation based on their relevance, innovation, results, insightfulness and overall clarity and content. Abstracts include: Newborn Intensive Care Nursery (NICN) Initiatives (“Baby Love Letters”, free parental parking, family mentor program, rounding with parents, and surgi- cal NICU skin to skin care); Education (foundational neurodevelopmental care program, Positive Oral Experiences Training, sleep care nursing educational program, NIDCAP mentored educational program); Research (neurobehavioral profile preterm and full- term comparisons, maternal administration of the EDIN Pain Scale, and neurobehavioral disorganization); and Beyond the NICN (Newborn Bridge Clinic, developmental care, and parental support). This body of work reflects our members’ and their colleagues’ wealth of knowledge, scientific curiosity, experience and creativity. We are enriched by learning from one another as we continue to evolve our NIDCAP model and its implementation for future generations. The Developmental Observer’s Editors welcome your comments and feedback. Developmentally yours, The Editors Developmental Observer Table of Contents Introduction ............................................... 1 Abstracts .................................................... 2 Meetings and Conferences .................... 23 NIDCAP on the Web ................................ 25 ABSTRACT EDITION Participants from our 28th Annual NIDCAP Trainers Meeting (October 21-24, 2017) in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 2 • 2018 • Developmental Observer An Enhanced Dynamic and Interactive Mentored Educational Program to Teach NIDCAP Principles in the Critical Care Setting Kathi Frankel, Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia Background Clinical and basic science evidence support early intervention as being protective of the developing brain of hospitalized infants. This support can also be stabilizing and nurturing for families as they encounter the healthcare environment. The purpose of this project is to disseminate the most current developmental practices to rehabilitation professionals working in the critical care environ- ment of infants, address consistency of care, and standardize the provision of assessment, treatment and support to infants and families. Objective • Test the effectiveness of an enhanced teaching method that tailors Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP) instruction to individual healthcare professionals. Methods A structured model for creating training programs and involving the five steps of Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation and Evaluation (ADDIE) was used by a NIDCAP Professional (KF) to guide and individualize learning in a mentored peer-to- peer training environment. Non-NIDCAP trained therapists (Physical, Occupational and Speech Therapy trainees) were given pre-mentoring, interim, and post-mentoring surveys to assess perceptions and gaps of knowledge in NIDCAP principles. Trainees completed interim and post-mentoring surveys of the mentor based on the principles of reflective supervision. Survey results were used throughout the intervention period to improve implementation. Knowledge gaps were discussed with each trainee to facilitate an individualized approach to learning. The NIDCAP evaluation form was used to identify coping versus worrisome infant behaviors and how those behaviors would affect the trainee’s interactions with the infant, family and staff. Once permission was obtained from staff to observe an episode of care, the mentor and trainee participated in a series of three bedside observational assessments led and facilitated by the mentor. Sessions included an interactive discussion between mentor and trainee regarding assessment of the physical environment while providing real-time descriptions of infant behaviors related to staff interactions and impact of the environment. At least one of the observation sessions occurred with the infant’s family present. NIDCAP training mate- rials were used to guide and structure the peer-to-peer discussion. Learners were guided in the use of a structured format (AMSAS – Autonomic/Motor/State/Attention/Self-regulation) to formulate a NIDCAP evaluation and goals. Conclusions Use of a structured, yet individualized training model that includes peer-to-peer interactions at the bedside with ongoing bi-direction- al mentor-trainee feedback has the potential to improve parent- infant development within a critical care setting by accelerating adoption of NIDCAP principles. This mentored instructional ap- proach may also increase healthy working relationships and create new champions for family-centered developmental care. References 1. Lee YW, Lin HL, Tseng HL, Tsai YM, Lee-Hsieh J. Using training needs assessment to develop a nurse preceptor-centered training program. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing. 2017; May 1;48(5):220-229. 2. Als H, Lester BM, Tronick E, Brazelton TB. Toward a research instrument for the assessment of preterm infants’ behavior (APIB). In Fitzgerald HE, Lester BM, Yogman MW (eds.), Theory and Research in Behavioral Pediatrics, Vol 1. New York: Plenum, 35-63, 1982. 3. Als H. Self-regulation and motor development in preterm infants. In Lockman J, Hazen N (eds.), Action in Social Context. Perspectives on Early Development. 1989; New York: Plenum Press, 65-97. Statement of Financial Support Kathi Frankel has no financial relationships with commercial entities to disclose. A semi-annual publication of the NIDCAP Federation International ©2018. The statements and opinions contained in this newsletter are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not necessarily of the NIDCAP Federation International. Articles from the Developmental Observer, duly acknowledged, may be reprinted with permission. Please contact us at: developmentalobserver@nidcap.org. Senior Editor Diane Ballweg, MSN, APRN, CNS, RNC-NIC Associate Editors Deborah Buehler, PhD Sandra Kosta, BA gretchen Lawhon, PhD, RN, CBC, FAAN Associate Editor Jeffrey R. Alberts, PhD for Science Contributions We would like to thank all of our individual donors for their generous support of the NFI and its continuing work. Developmental Observer Developmental Observer • 2018 • 3 Jessica Bowen and Jean Powlesland University of Illinois Medical Center at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois Background In supporting the relationship between parents and their baby, it’s important for providers in the newborn intensive care unit (NICU) to understand how parents view their baby. Research shows a parent’s view of their child will impact how they interact and how they parent. Many parents start to imagine and attach to their baby while the baby is still in the womb. This time is shortened for NICU parents, sometimes nearly in half. It is critical to understand how a NICU parent views their child, how they imagine who the baby already is and to help them create a rich and full understanding of their child’s strengths and chal- lenges in the NICU and beyond. As we support NIDCAP, the University of Illinois (UI) Health NICU created Baby Love Let- ters written from the voice of the newborn to help parents bond, understand and support their baby while in the NICU. Objectives • Help parents develop an understanding of their infant’s unique experience in the NICU. • Support parents to feel confident interacting and bonding with their baby. • Provide a sentimental, informational and easy to use tool for parents to foster the emerging parent-infant relationship and support development of their baby. Methods The UI Health NICU piloted the Baby Love Letter program in January 2017 by crafting templates using Parenting Based on the Developmental Progression of Preterm Infants (Children’s Medical Ventures 2006) as a guide. Distinct from NIDCAP observations, the templates are written in the first person from the baby to his/ her parent(s). The baby’s primary therapist, using a synactive theo- ry approach, individualizes the templates. The letters are provided to the family as well as entered into the electronic medical chart. Since January, parents with a baby born at 29 weeks and younger were invited to receive a love letter every two weeks. All parents, 17 families with 21 babies, opted to receive the letters. Oral feedback regarding the experience of receiving the letters was obtained during hospitalization. Quantitative data was also gath- ered near discharge using a survey designed to capture the mother’s attitude towards her child and her feelings of closeness to her child as well as her role as a mother. During this initial period, two babies in the program died. The letters may be a valuable resource in grieving and remain a keepsake for these families. Conclusions The goal of the Baby Love Letters is to help parents see their baby as a unique being, and support them in their parenting role. Oral feedback from parents during their NICU stay included: • A mother of twin boys stated she would like to frame the first letter because it was the first thing she received signed by both her boys. Later, this mother said she used the letters to help engage the anxious father, who at first was skeptical because the letters were writ- ten in the “baby’s voice”, but now he really likes them, especially how they are individualized to each baby. The mother used the letters that discussed skin-to-skin holding with him to help him build the confidence he needed to provide kangaroo care. • Another mother posted the first letter on Facebook and proudly reported it received 107 likes. She was excited to have her friends and family read the letter from her very small 26 week baby girl. The mother expressed gratitude, saved the letters in a scrapbook, and reads the letters often, although she reported they make her cry “in a good way.” The mother waits to open her letters until her baby’s father is with her, like a ritual. He usually reads the letters out loud to her. Results of the written surveys given at discharge were evalu- ated. At this time, six surveys have been collected. All mothers’ either Agreed or Strongly Agreed on the following statements: • I feel secure taking the responsibility of caring for my baby (e.g., changing diapers, bathing, tucking into bed). • I feel my baby likes to have contact with me in the form of touch, voice, scent, eye contact (all separate questions). • It was easy for me to assume my role as a mother. Additional feedback: • Please describe your experience receiving love letters from your baby: • “I LOVED THEM! Even though I know it wasn’t from her literally, it felt like everything she would say. I always felt warm reading them and they were a huge help in getting me through.” • “Oh my God I loved the letters. They were amazing.” • “I liked it. It was a good experience because I learned things I didn’t know she would like - like she likes her head rubbed!” • “I enjoyed reading them. They helped me feel like I was included in his development. It provided great ideas and clues regarding the things he was going through. Although I know other mothers receive the same letter or are very similar, it felt very personal and went according to my son’s development.” NICU Baby Love Letters Christyn Davis reading a love letter from her daughter, Cailynn Continued on page 11 4 • 2018 • Developmental Observer Newborn Bridge Clinic to Support Infant Transition Home gretchen Lawhon, Clinical Nurse Scientist/NIDCAP Master Trainer, West Coast NIDCAP and APIB Training Center, San Francisco, California, U.S.A Background High risk and premature infants are discharged from the newborn intensive care unit (NICU) when they consistently gain weight, maintain their body temperature, are able to eat by mouth, have had their medical problems addressed with a plan of care, their parents and family are comfortable with the care required and the discharge teaching has been completed. The decision for discharge home is individualized to best meet the needs of the infant within the context of his or her family’s readiness. Despite this, often parents feel this is an anxious and difficult time. The current follow up program, in collaboration with a nearby large hospital system, provides periodic develop- mental check-ups for infants discharged from the NICU. Parents can arrange for this service through their pediatrician or family medicine physician. The typical schedule begins at three months corrected age. For example, if an infant was born at 28 weeks gestation (three months early), their first visit with the Neona- tal Follow-up Program may be when they are six months old in chronologic age. The majority of infants are discharged from the NICU by the time of their original due date and some are dis- charged even sooner, perhaps a month earlier if they are doing well and have met discharge criteria. This leads to a situation of fami- lies, having experienced tremendous therapeutic support for weeks and months in the NICU, being discharged home with a gap of three to four months before they may begin newborn follow up. Objectives • Infants and families receive support during the transition from hospital to home and community. • Parents gain greater understanding of their infant’s behavior with anticipatory guidance for caregiving to enhance matura- tion and development while strategizing ways to support the infant’s vulnerability. • The neurobehavioral assessment, the Assessment of Preterm Infant Behavior (APIB), will be performed every two to four weeks to monitor the infant’s emerging neurobehavioral orga- nization and self-regulation, as well as the parents’ increasing degree of both competence and confidence in parenting. • The infant’s primary care provider will be supported with consultation and expertise to monitor the infant’s transition. Implementation This Newborn Bridge Clinic is a new innovative approach to “mind the gap” and support infants and families as they leave the hospital and transition home during the three to four months before they will be seen in a newborn follow up clinic. The Clinic provides neurobehavioral assessment for screening and interven- tion, and medical co-management of the infant’s medical needs in collaboration with the infant’s primary health care provider. The Bridge Clinic begins within the NICU with the forma- tion of supportive relationships to be continued through the transition to home and the community. The physicians, clini- cal nurse scientist and nutritionist facilitate this transition and provide the crucial safety net for those with complex medical conditions. Infants born prematurely and/or who have special medical or social problems are seen in the Bridge Clinic one to two weeks after discharge and at intervals ranging from one to four weeks depending on the specific needs until they enter the current neonatal follow up program in collaboration with the larger collaborative hospital. Individualized care is provided through the multidisciplinary team assessing the infant’s health, nutrition, growth, tempera- ment and development as well as the parents’ degree of comfort and ability to provide nurturing care especially around the issues of feeding, sleeping and crying. Parents are supported in gaining both confidence and competence in providing the sometimes very complex medical needs for these fragile infants. The provi- sion of positive reinforcement of parenting and anticipatory guidance supports families in their transition from the newborn intensive care unit to their home and community. The Bridge Clinic provides written summaries to communi- cate with the infants’ primary medical care providers following each clinic visit and collaborate as needed to supplement their primary medical care. This may involve referrals for visiting nurses, early intervention and other programs within the family’s community. Management of the special medical needs of these infants’ (e.g., medications, feeding problems, chronic conditions such as lung disease, apnea monitor care) and ongoing devel- opmental assessment and intervention assures the infant’s best growth and development. Summary Success of the Bridge Clinic will be evaluated through statistics and measurements including: • Number of infants seen in the Bridge Clinic. • Rate of rehospitalization within the first six months following discharge from the NICU. • Summary scores of the neurobehavioral evaluation (APIB) to show increasing maturation and neurobehavioral organization. • Growth patterns of the infants. • Parent engagement measured through the NICU Parent Risk Evaluation and Engagement Model and Instrument (PREEMI). • Successful entry into the traditional newborn follow-up pro- gram at three months corrected age. Statement of Financial Support The Newborn Bridge Clinic received financial support from the Innovators’ Circle Program of the Abington Health Foundation. gretchen Lawhon has no financial relationships with commercial entities to disclose. Developmental Observer • 2018 • 5 Background Parental stress impairs parents’ ability to interact optimally with their infants and may lead to poor child developmental out- comes.1 One of the most recommended suggestions for support- ing parents’ roles as caregivers is parent participation in medical rounds.2 Some gaps have been demonstrated, however, between the goals of family centered care and its actual practice.3 There is debate about the pros and cons of facilitating parental participa- tion in the newborn intensive care unit (NICU) and in rounds, with most reports not providing a clear determination of best practice.4 Most of these studies were conducted in the United States, Australia, and a large number of countries in northern Europe. Nevertheless, the incorporation of family centered care is not widely used in the countries of southern Europe.5 Objectives The hypotheses of the study was that implementation of a new model for including families in medical rounds based on family-centered care in the NICU, the adapted family-centered care model (AFCR), will not decrease parent satisfaction, will not increase parent stress, and will improve professional satisfaction compared to the traditional rounding model (TR). The primary aims of the study were to compare the level of stress and the degree of family satisfaction, as well as the degree of professional satisfac- tion between both models of rounds. The secondary aim was to define the characteristics of parents who chose the AFCR model. Methods In April 2016, the new AFCR rounding model, which included parent involvement, was implemented in the NICU. From this moment on, parents could willingly choose to participate in clin- ical rounds. Data collection was performed between June 2016 and December 2016 with surveys given to parents and profes- sionals. Prior to implementation of the AFCR model, prospec- tive data collection was also performed from October 2015 to March 2016, when parent participation in medical rounds (TR model) was nonexistent. Three groups of parents were defined: those who decided to participate willingly in rounds (group 1), those who decided not to participate in rounds when they had the possibility to participate in this (group 2), and the parents of the previous period in which they didn’t have the possibil- ity to participate in rounds (group 3). Three groups of profes- sionals were also defined: those professionals whose parents of their patients decided to participate in rounds (group A), those professionals whose parents decided not to participate in rounds when they had the possibility to participate (group B), and those professionals of the previous period whose parents did not have the opportunity to participate in rounds (group C). The study was performed in a level IIIC NICU with 900 admissions per year and an affiliated NIDCAP Training Cen- ter. All resident doctors, assistant physicians and nurses were offered participation in the study. Parents were included if their newborn was in the NICU at least seven days, parents agreed to participate in the study and signed the informed consent. Parents were excluded from the study if there was a language barrier and/ or if they were less than 18 years old. When an infant had been in the NICU at least one week, both parents were offered an assessment. The assessment con- sisted of two questionnaires: the Parental Stress Scale: Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (PSS:NICU)6 and the Neonatal Instrument of Parent Satisfaction (NIPS)7, as well as additional questions about education and demographic data. Both questionnaires were completed twice: on the seventh day of hospitalization and on the day of discharge from the intensive care room. A ques- tionnaire was distributed to staff on the day of discharge. Results Recruitment included 47, 26 and 63 parents (Groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively) and 37, 29 and 63 professionals (Groups A, B and C, respectively). Response rates were 87.2% for parents and 78.5% for professionals. There were no significant differences in anxiety or satisfaction between the three groups of parents. The profession- al Group A had higher scores on the satisfaction scales than Group B (4.38 ± 0.64 vs 3.97 ± 0.68, p = 0.04). The parents of Group 1 had baseline anxiety scores generated by alarms higher than those of Group 2 (8.73 ± 4.55 vs 10.79 ± 4.74, p 0.04). Parents showed significantly higher scores in three of the five questions about the utility of the new model for parents than the professionals. Conclusion Implementation of a rounding model that allows participation of parents in a NICU does not increase parental stress or decrease family satisfaction. This practice increases professional satisfac- tion and was not perceived to further inhibit clinical discus- sion or teaching in clinical rounds. The parents who were more stressed by the sounds and the alarms of the unit preferred to participate in medical rounds. References 1. Davis L, Edwards H, Mohay H, Wollin J. The impact of very premature birth on the psycho- logical health of mothers. Early Human Development. 2003; 73:61–70. 2. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Hospital Care, Institute for Patient- and Family Centered Care. Patient- and family-centered care and the pediatrician’s role. Pediatrics. 2012; 129:394–404. 3. Dunn M, Reilly M, Johnston A, Hoopes R Jr, Abraham M. Development and dissemination of potentially better practices for the provision of family-centered care in neonatology: The family-centered care map. Pediatrics. 2006; 118:S95–S107. The Impact of a New Model for Rounding with Parents on Families and Professionals Salvador Piris1, María López Maestro1, Bárbara Muñoz1, Javier de la Cruz2 and Carmen Pallas1 1 Neonatology Unit, 12 de Octubre Hospital, Madrid, Spain 2 Epidemiology, Unit 12 de Octubre Hospital, Purificación Sierra Psychology University UNED, Madrid, Spain 6 • 2018 • Developmental Observer Background Sensory experiences of infants in the newborn intensive care unit (NICU) are vastly different from those that are biologically ex- pected. The NICU environment can adversely impact the preterm infant’s rapidly developing brain.1–3 Subsequent alterations in the preterm infant’s cognitive, physiological, emotional, and social development may persist beyond the NICU.1,4–6 Engaging parents in learning their vulnerable infant’s unique abilities and challenges enhances the quality of parent-child relationships, which is critical for optimal neurodevelopmental outcomes.7–12 Skin-to-skin care (SSC) promotes parental participation, strengthens the family role in the care of the fragile infant in the NICU, decreases parental feelings of helplessness, and increases responsiveness to the infant’s behavioral communication.13,14 Improved neurodevelopmen- tal outcomes, autonomic functioning, quality of sleep, growth, physiological stability, and attenuated stress and pain responses are associated with SSC for preterm infants.15–17 The evidence for SSC is primarily drawn from preterm or healthy term newborns. Despite growing recognition of similar adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes for infants born around term requiring surgery shortly after birth,18–21 there is limited lit- erature specifically discussing the use of SSC in this population. Interventions are needed to address potentially modifiable risk factors. Surgical infants may not be able to be held in traditional SSC. Factors related to their specialized care make providing SSC challenging including wires, tubes, machinery, surgical wounds, environmental constraints of the unit, perceived fragility of the infant, and uncertainty of the safety or feasibility of SSC. Parent touch techniques provided in a responsive and synchronous pat- tern can attenuate infant stress responses and improve parent-child interactions, thus improving family resiliency and functioning beyond the NICU.11, 22–24 Support for alternative interventions promoting parent touch may be an important sustainable link in helping these infants achieve optimal neurodevelopmental progress in the surgical NICU and beyond. Objectives • Outline implementation of an initiative focusing on SSC and alternative touch methods within the context of a develop- mental care program in a surgical NICU. • Discuss educational strategies used during implementation. • Describe adaptations necessary for success within a surgical NICU. • Highlight challenges experienced during implementation. • Outline plans for evaluation. Approach Prior to December 2016, SSC was infrequently and inconsis- tently practiced in this unit. The multidisciplinary initiative was implemented over three months in an 18-bed level III NICU that cares for newborns transferred from other facilities with sur- gical and/or cardiac conditions pre- and post-operatively. When unable to be held in traditional SSC, the initiative encouraged parental alternative touch methods including: (a) cradle holds with skin contact, (b) side-lying SSC, (c) skin contact while infant is in bed using arm encirclement, and (d) responsive par- ent touch such as supporting finger grasps or hand swaddling based on infant behavioral communication. Although seemingly simple, SSC and alternative touch methods were difficult to inte- grate into the highly technological, rapid-turnover NICU. Paired with the intensive monitoring and medical support provided to the infants, the physical environment and staff attitudes also presented as challenges. A systematic and adaptive approach was necessary to address the unit’s challenges and staff apprehensions, by allowing ample opportunity for engagement, discussion, and critical reflection. A multidisciplinary team created a comprehensive SSC package. Pictorial and written tools were developed for staff and parents prior to implementation. Parent resources, created with input from the parent advisory council, outlined the benefits of SSC, introduced safety guidelines, and provided a description of both traditional SSC holding and alternative touch methods. Staff guidelines paralleled parent resources, with greater depth and complexity. These tools were used to facilitate discussion and ongoing review between staff and parents. Staff and family collaboratively determined the most appropriate and feasible method of SSC based on a holistic assessment of the infant. These team discussions also addressed perceived barriers and determined any modifications needed to ensure safety and Implementing Skin-to-Skin Care and Alternative Touch Methods in a Surgical Newborn Intensive Care Unit Valerie Levesque1, Krystal Johnson1, Amy McKenzie2, Andrea Nykipilo1, Barbara Taylor1, Andrea Goldsmith1 and Chloe Joynt3 1 NICU, Stollery Children’s Hospital, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 2 Respiratory Therapy, Stollery Children’s Hospital, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 3 NICU, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Stollery Children’s Hospital, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 4. Maestro M, Melgar A, De la Cruz J, Perapoch J, Mosqueda R, Pallás C. Cuidados centrados en el Desarrollo. Situación en las unidades de Neonatología de España. Anales De Pediatria. 2004; 81:232-40. 5. Pallás CR, Losacco V, Maraschini A, Greisen G, Pierrat V, Warren I et al. Parental involve- ment and kangaroo care in European neonatal intensive care unit: A policy survey in eight countries. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. 2012; 13:568-77. 6. Miles MS, Funk SG, Carlson J. Parental Stressor scale: Neonatal intensive care unit. Nursing Research. 1993; 42:148–152. 7. Mitchell-Dicenso A, Guyatt G, Paes B, Blatz S, Kirpalani H, Fryers M, Hunsberger M, et al. A new measure of parent satisfaction with medical care provided in the neonatal intensive care unit. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1996; 49:313–318. Developmental Observer • 2018 • 7 comfort. Journal articles addressing SSC and touch were posted to the online staff communication forum. Although attempts to engage staff in online critical analysis of the articles were difficult, staff engaged in dialogue about article content during education sessions. Low-fidelity mannequins were used to conduct SSC and standing transfer simulations to support staff in learning to navigate the challenging physical constraints of the environment and problem-solve issues that may arise in a safe and anticipatory manner. Once approximately one-third of staff had participated, simulations were no longer deemed necessary by staff. The focus changed from simulations to learning through peer mentorship, with multidisciplinary SSC champions guiding the team in- the-moment. Those comfortable and supportive of the initiative acted as champions for knowledge translation, modelled the safety and efficacy of the initiative, and began to foster this as a socially acceptable change in practice. A questionnaire will be distributed to staff to assess atti- tudes and perceptions surrounding the integration of SSC and alternative touch methods into practice. An audit tool is being developed to assess SSC and alternative touch frequency and to capture challenges experienced by staff and parents. Results will guide continual improvement and future direction. Summary The initiative was applied systematically due to the medical complexity and high acuity of the tenuous patient population, the human and material resources needed to facilitate SSC, the challenging physical environment, and staff apprehensions. The healthcare team’s clinical judgment was respected in establishing the balance of the infant’s medical care with the equally impor- tant neurodevelopmental and social-emotional needs to deter- mine the most appropriate and feasible type of touch over time, which fostered participation in the initiative. The fluidity and adaptability in the initiative was critical to providing responsive, infant-centered, and family-inclusive care at all stages of the infant’s illness and convalescence. Adoption of these practices has not been fully embraced by all staff. Continued efforts must fo- cus on supporting staff integration of SSC and touch as essential, routine components of care. It is anticipated the benefits of SSC for cardiac and surgical infants will parallel those observed in the preterm and healthy term populations. Delineating neurodevelopmental outcomes specifically attributed to SSC and alternative touch methods may be challenging given the many potential confounders. Future re- search and discussion regarding the impact of these interventions on the neurodevelopmental outcomes of infants in the surgical NICU is warranted. References 1. Graven SN, Browne J V. Sensory development in the fetus, neonate, and infant: Introduction and overview. Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews. 2008; 8(4):169-172. 2. VandenBerg KA. Individualized developmental care for high risk newborns in the NICU: A practice guideline. Early Human Development. 2007; 83(7):433-442. 3. Als H, Duffy FH, McAnulty GB, et al. Early experience alters brain function and structure. Pediatrics. 2004; 113(4):846-857. 4. Saigal S, Doyle LW. An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood. Lancet. 2008; 371(9608):261-269. 5. Burnett AC, Scratch SE, Anderson PJ. Executive function outcome in preterm adolescents. Early Human Development. 2013; 89(4):215-220. 6. Marlow N, Wolke D, Bracewell MA, Samara M, for the EPICure Study Group. Neurologic and developmental disability at six years of age after extremely preterm birth. New England Journal of Medicine. 2005; 352(1):9-19. 7. Reynolds LC, Duncan MM, Smith GC, et al. Parental presence and holding in the neonatal intensive care unit and associations with early neurobehavior. Journal of Perinatology. 2013; 33(8):636-641. 8. Laing S, McMahon C, Ungerer J, Taylor A, Badawi N, Spence K. Mother–child interaction and child developmental capacities in toddlers with major birth defects requiring newborn surgery. Early Human Development. 2010; 86(12):793-800. 9. Als H, Gilkerson L. The role of relationship-based developmentally supportive newborn intensive care in strengthening outcome of preterm infants. Seminars in Perinatology. 1997; 21(3):178-189. 10. Welch MG, Firestein MR, Austin J, et al. Family nurture intervention in the neonatal inten- sive care unit improves social relatedness, attention, and neurodevelopment of preterm infants at 18 months in a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2015; 56(11):1202-1211. 11. Craig JW, Glick C, Phillips R, Hall SL, Smith J, Browne J. Recommendations for involving the family in developmental care of the NICU baby. Journal of Perinatology. 2015; 35,S1:S5-S8. 12. Landry SH, Smith KE, Swank PR. Responsive parenting: Establishing early foundations for social, communication, and independent problem-solving skills. Developmental Psychology. 2006; 42(4):627-642. 13. Conde-Agudelo A, Díaz-Rossello JL. Kangaroo mother care to reduce morbidity and mortal- ity in low birthweight infants. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews. 2016; (8):CD002771. 14. Nyqvist KH, Anderson GC, Bergman N, et al. Towards universal kangaroo mother care: Recommendations and report from the first European conference and seventh international workshop on kangaroo mother care. Acta Paediatrica. 2010; 99(6):820-826. 15. Feldman R, Rosenthal Z, Eidelman AI. Maternal-preterm skin-to-skin contact enhances child physiologic organization and cognitive control across the first 10 years of life. Biological Psychiatry. 2014; 75(1):56-64. 16. Charpak N, Tessier R, Ruiz JG, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of kangaroo mother care versus traditional care. Pediatrics. 2017; 139(1):e20162063. 17. Baley J, Newborn Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Skin-to-skin care for term and preterm infants in the neonatal ICU. Pediatrics. 2015; 136(3):596-599. 18. Wernovsky G. Current insights regarding neurological and developmental abnormalities in children and young adults with complex congenital cardiac disease. Cardiology in the Young. 2006; 16(S1):92-104. 19. Freed DH, Robertson CMT, Sauve RS, et al. Intermediate-term outcomes of the arterial switch operation for transposition of great arteries in neonates: Alive but well? Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2006; 132(4):845-852.e2. 20. Alton GY, Robertson CMT, Sauve R, et al. Early childhood health, growth, and neurodevel- opmental outcomes after complete repair of total anomalous pulmonary venous connection at 6 weeks or younger. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2007; 133(4):905-911.e3. 21. Laing S, Walker K, Ungerer J, Badawi N, Spence K. Early development of children with major birth defects requiring newborn surgery. Journal of Paediatric and Child Health. 2011; 47(3):140- 147. 22. Feldman R, Singer M, Zagoory O. Touch attenuates infants’ physiological reactivity to stress. Developmental Science. 2010; 13(2):271-278. 23. Westrup B, Sizun J, Lagercrantz H. Family-centered developmental supportive care: A holistic and humane approach to reduce stress and pain in neonates. Journal of Perinatology. 2007; 27(S1):S12-S18. 24. Browne J V, Talmi A. Family-based intervention to enhance infant-parent relationships in the neonatal intensive care unit. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 2005; 30(8):667-677. Statement of Financial Support Valerie Levesque, Krystal Johnson, Amy McKenzie, Andrea Nykipilo, Barbara Taylor, Andrea Goldsmith, and Chloe Joynt have no financial relationships with commercial entities to disclose. 8 • 2018 • Developmental Observer Background In September 2013, the 20 bed Level II newborn intensive care unit (NICU) at South Health Campus (SHC) opened. This hos- pital is unique in Calgary in that the mission statement of the care provided at the hospital is based on four pillars of innovation, wellness, collaborative practice and patient/family centered care. These pillars are well aligned with the principles of NIDCAP. Most NICUs in Alberta do not have dedicated full time equiva- lent (FTE) positions for occupational therapy (OT) or physical therapy (PT) services and provide care only by consultation. In accordance with the mission statement of SHC, pediatric OT and PT roles were developed, and dedicated positions were allocated for both of these allied health professionals. In December 2015, a 0.6 FTE OT was hired, followed by a 0.5 FTE Physical Therapist in July 2016. Their roles were to support the NICU and the two outpatient Pediatric Clinics for consultation including feeding, musculoskeletal conditions and plagiocephaly. Additionally, these therapists, in conjunction with the site lead neonatologist, agreed to pilot a program in the NICU beginning in November 2016. For this program, the therapists assess all babies born at less than 34 weeks gestation and weighing less than 1500 grams using the Test for Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) prior to discharge at approximately 36 weeks post-menstrual age (PMA). The NICU therapists also supported the outpatient Pediatrics Clinic where some NICU graduates are seen by parent choice, usually due to proximity to their home. Parents were encouraged to ask for de- velopmental support if needed; the pediatrician made referrals to OT and PT when indicated. The therapists also started a develop- mental play group for families who were receiving individual care. Parents attended every two weeks for six sessions. The play group allowed for more frequent visits, while being more financially and time efficient for the therapists. Objectives • Use the TIMP as a framework for assessing motor devel- opment in the NICU and post-discharge for babies with increased risk for developmental delay. • Educate parents about typical development and how to pro- mote motor development through play. • Provide a seamless model of developmental care from NICU to home. • Highlight opportunities for developmental play at home. Approach All babies born less than 34 weeks gestation weighing less than 1500 grams were offered a TIMP assessment which was done at approximately 36 weeks PMA at the earliest, and was typi- cally done in the week prior to discharge home. If the baby was discharged home over a weekend and the assessment was missed, it could be completed in the Pediatric Clinic post-discharge if they were referred to the Pediatric Clinic at SHC. If they had a community pediatrician, this was not possible. Parents were encouraged to be present for the assessment. After the assessment, the age equivalent score was provided to the parents as well as some specific developmental suggestions for play, based on the assessment results. A general developmen- tal play handout was developed and provided to the caregiver and reviewed to ensure understanding. Parents were given the therapist contact information and were encouraged to contact therapists if there were further questions or concerns. Babies who attended the Pediatric Clinic also had the op- portunity to be involved with a biweekly play group. All allied health professionals were available to consult at the play ses- sions, with PT and OT present at every play session. The play group offered not only the opportunity for discussion about motor development, but was also helpful to parents in access- ing community services, forming relationships and establishing a support network. Parents’ evaluations of the playgroups were very positive. TIMP results and parent evaluation forms from the playgroup were collected. Conclusion Initially, there was no defined role for either the OT or PT to participate in daily care in the NICU other than for specific con- sultations for feeding, musculoskeletal conditions (e.g., club foot, brachial plexus injury) or plagiocephaly concerns. This program at the SHC site highlights the importance of developmental care in promoting motor development for preterm and very low birth weight infants not only in the NICU, but also after discharge home. Parents are gaining a greater understanding about the importance of developmental play from a very early age, as well as how to understand the foundational nature of achieving de- velopmental milestones. Parents are also supported in providing developmentally appropriate play opportunities for their children and help foster improved parent-child interaction. References 1. Campbell SK & Hedeker D. Validity of the test of infant motor performance for discriminat- ing among infants with varying risk for poor motor outcome. Journal of Pediatrics. 2001;139 (4):546-551. 2. Rose RU & Westcott SL. Responsiveness of the test of infant motor performance (TIMP) in infants born preterm. Pediatric Physical Therapy. 2005(17):219-224. 3. Noble Y & Boyd R. Neonatal assessments for the preterm infant up to 4 months corrected age: a systematic review. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology. 2012(54):129-139. 4. Dusing SC, Brown SE, Van Dres CM, Thacker LR & Hendricks-Munoz KD. Supporting play From TIMP to Toddler: Developmental Care from NICU to Home Allison Massey1 and Anna Wiens2 1 Pediatric Physical Therapist, South Health Campus, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada 2 Pediatric Occupational Therapist, South Health Campus, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada Developmental Observer • 2018 • 9 Background Having a preterm or full-term baby in the NICU is a stressful and emotional time for families. Often the most effective family support comes from connecting with other families who have had a similar lived experience. Such peer support has been a pri- ority of the Stollery Children’s Hospital’s NICU Family Advisory Care Team (FACT) since its inception in 2010. Objective • Create a NICU Family Mentor Program Methods Following success of the Stollery Family Bedside Orientation Pro- gram, a one-to-one bedside peer support program on an inpatient pediatric unit, the NICU Family Mentor Program was created in the 69 bed, non-surgical NICU in June, 2016. The program was designed to further a culture of patient and family centered care, by supporting families in providing care for their infant and engaging with their child’s healthcare team through meaningful interactions between inpatient families and peer mentors. Family Mentors are recruited through the Stollery Patient & Family Centered Care (PFCC) Network and through a Facebook page for NICU graduates. Interested parents are considered for the Family Mentor role if they had experience with a child in the NICU and can commit 10-12 volunteer hours per month over a year. Family Mentors complete eight hours of training and an interview with the Stollery PFCC Coordinator to learn more about peer mentoring and explore their readiness to support families at the bedside. Training includes in-class instruction and role playing activities which emphasize peer mentor skills and attributes, such as: • Strong listening and communication skills. • Awareness of the role and of the responsibilities and boundar- ies of a peer mentor. • Ability to support families by using inclusive language and without passing judgment, creating emotional dependency or influencing family decisions. • Ability to recognize when it is necessary to debrief or ask for help from a Stollery PFCC staff member or a health care professional. All Family Mentors are brought on as hospital volunteers which requires completing criminal record and vulnerable sector clearances, reference checks, baseline health screening, and signing a confiden- tiality agreement before interacting with families. Novice Family Mentors complete their first three volunteer shifts in tandem with a veteran Family Mentor before independently visiting families. Family Mentors visit inpatient families at their infant’s bedside every two weeks and engage them by being a listening presence and having open, honest, judgement free conversations fostering strength, empowerment and hope in the inpatient family. At the beginning of each shift, Family Mentors check in with the charge nurse or unit social worker to learn which families are new to the unit and could benefit from a visit. Other pertinent information is also shared at this time. This profes- sional oversight helps prevent Family Mentors from accidentally entering into emotionally volatile or intense situations requiring conduct and expertise beyond the scope of their role. Family Mentors begin each visit by introducing themselves and the Family Mentor Program. They emphasize their role as non-medical staff available to provide a listening presence for families. As well as acting in this role, Family Mentors aim to enhance family knowledge with information about: • The unit and hospital environment. • Best practices for patient safety. • How to participate in a child’s care and care team. A formal evaluation of the Family Mentor Program will soon be available. Anecdotal evidence collected from inpatient families and staff members indicate the program has had a posi- tive effect. Many families indicated their appreciation of Family Mentor visits and one staff member remarked, “It’s good to see Family Mentors here. We have lots of new families who could use a visit.” Expanding the program to provide peer support for breastfeeding mothers and for families on the antepartum unit is currently being explored. Conclusion The Family Mentor Program is a promising model supporting families in their role of actively caring for their infant children and participating in their health care decisions. Through this program, one-to-one bedside peer support has become a comple- mentary but essential resource available to families navigating what at times can be a complex and challenging experience. Statement of Financial Support The authors have no financial relationships with commercial entities to disclose. Implementation of a Newborn Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Family Mentor Program Christie Oswald1 and Sarah Topilko1 1 Coordinator of Patient & Family Centered Care, Stollery Children’s Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada exploration and early development intervention from NICU to home: A feasibility study. Pediatric Physical Therapy. 2015:(27):267-274. 5. Dusing SC, Lobo MA, Lee H-M, & Galloway JC. Intervention in the first weeks of life for infants born late preterm: A case series. Pediatric Physical Therapy. 2013(25):194-203. Statement of Financial Support Allison Massey and Anna Wiens have no financial relationships with commer- cial entities to disclose. 10 • 2018 • Developmental Observer Introduction Preterm babies in the NICU are exposed to acute and chronic pain. Parents are concerned about the pain of their baby and this concern is associated with a higher level of parental stress. Parents want greater involvement in infant pain prevention and management. The EDIN scale is used by nurses to evaluate prolonged pain and includes only behavioral items routinely ob- served by parent and nurse caregivers during everyday care (e.g., quality of sleep, facial expression, body movements, interaction with the caregivers, consolability). Objectives • Primary objective: Evaluate the feasibility of parental involve- ment in the use of the EDIN scale by comparing EDIN scores, contemporaneously and blindly recorded by the at- tending nurse (EDIN-N) and by the mother (EDIN-M). • Secondary objective: Assess the level of mother’s stress at the time of NICU discharge by the administration of the Parental Stress Scale (NICU). Methods Study Design An experimental clinical prospective monocentric study design was employed in a level 3 NICU that provides NIDCAP-based care and is open 24 hours a day to parents. Inclusion criteria en- compassed newborns receiving pain assessment using the EDIN scale according to NICU protocol and for whom informed consent was obtained. Non-Italian native-speaking mothers and mothers unable to stay for at least four hours with their baby during at least one of the three nursing shifts (morning, after- noon or night shift) were excluded. Study Phases Within the first week of hospitalization, the mother or both parents met with two NIDCAP professionals and one nurse. During this meeting, the booklet, “How to help our children to prevent stress and pain in the NICU”, supported by multime- dia materials subsequently given to parents, was used to show parents how to recognize pain with special attention to the items of the EDIN score and how help to relieve pain. Within one week following the first meeting, a second meeting was proposed to reinforce the information and to clarify doubts. At discharge the mother’s stress level was measured by a psychologist using the Parental Stress Scale (NICU). Data collection and analysis Maternal and newborn data were collected and recorded in an Excel database file. The type of respiratory support, sedation, sur- gery, venous lines, feeding mode, postnatal age, and any painful maneuvers were also recorded. Data were analyzed by statistical package SPSS 13.0. Non-parametric statistics were used to ana- lyze EDIN scores that did not fit normal distribution. An alpha error < 5% was considered significant. Results Here we present preliminary data on 179 EDIN scores that were contemporaneously recorded by nurses and mothers (8) in twelve newborns at a mean postnatal age of 34±15 days of life (range 11 to 70). Mean birth weight of recruited newborns was 1300±500 grams. Overall, both EDIN-N (median 0, range 0-3) and EDIN-M (median 2, range 0-12) were below the thresh- old of pain. EDIN-M were significantly higher compared with EDIN-N (Mann-Whitney test, P=0.000, fig. 1). The difference between EDIN-M and EDIN-N is shown in fig. 2. In 24% of cases, EDIN-M and EDIN-N were identical, in 64% of cases EDIN-M was higher than EDIN-N, and only in 12% of cases EDIN-N was higher than EDIN-M. EDIN-M, but not EDIN-N, showed a positive significant correlation with painful maneuvers performed during the period of EDIN score recording (Spearman’s rho, P=0.041). EDIN-N, but not EDIN-M were significantly lower (P=0.02 for EDIN-N) in the morning compared with the afternoon. The mother’s level of stress measured by the Parental Stress Scale at discharge was not statistically different from a score ob- tained from a comparable group of 14 mothers (71±15.6 versus 60.56 ±16.1, P=0.02) studied before the beginning of this study protocol. Conclusions Mothers willingly agreed to participate in the study and their level of stress at discharge was comparable with that of mothers not participating at the study. Even when both median EDIN-N and EDIN-M were below the threshold of pain, mothers’ scores The EDIN Pain Scale Administered by Mothers in the Newborn Intensive Care Unit (NICU): Validation of a New Pain Assessment Model Natascia Simeone1, Elena Baudassi2, Sara Grandi2, Francesca Fabbri1, Tania Pesaresi3, Marco Salonia4, Sandra Lazzari5, Anna Tarocco2, Alessandra Montesi6, Elisa Facondini6 and Gina Ancora2,7 1 RN, NIDCAP Professional, NICU, Ospedale Infermi, Rimini, Italy 2 Neonatologist, NICU Ospedale Infermi, Rimini, Italy 3 Staff Registered Nurse, NICU Ospedale Infermi, Rimini, Italy 4 Family Representative, NICU, Ospedale Infermi, Rimini, Italy 5 Nurse Manager, NICU, Ospedale Infermi, Rimini, Italy 6 Psychologist, NICU, Ospedale Infermi, Rimini, Italy 7 Chief of Neonatology, NICU, Ospedale Infermi, Rimini, Italy Developmental Observer • 2018 • 11 were more modulated compared with nurses’ scores. More- over, EDIN-M scores correlated more with painful procedures. Nurses, but not mothers, attributed lower pain scores during the morning compared with the afternoon shift, maybe underscoring signs of pain and stress during hours with higher level of activity. Our data confirm those reported by other authors who suggested an ‘‘institutional insensitivity’’ of health professionals to signs of stress and pain in infants, with health professionals becoming slightly habituated to patient pain signs due to extended exposure. References 1. Debillon T, Zupan V, Ravault N, Magny JF, Dehan M. Development and initial validation of the EDIN scale, a new tool for assessing prolonged pain in preterm infants. Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal Edition. 2001; 85(1):F36-41. 2. Franck LS, Oulton K, Nderitu S, Lim M, Fang S, Kaiser A. Parent involvement in pain man- agement for NICU infants: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2011; 128(3):510-8. 3. Gale G, Franck LS, Kools S, Lynch M. Parents’ perceptions of their infant’s pain experience in the NICU. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2004; 41(1):51-8. 4. Montirosso R, Fedeli C, Del Prete A, Calciolari G, Borgatti R; NEO-ACQUA Study Group. Maternal stress and depressive symptoms associated with quality of developmental care in 25 Italian Neonatal Intensive Care Units: a cross sectional observational study. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2014; 51(7):994-1002. 5. Pillai Riddell RR, Craig KD. Judgments of infant pain: the impact of caregiver identity and infant age. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 2007; 32(5):501-11. 6. Vinall J, Miller SP, Synnes AR, Grunau RE. Parent behaviors moderate the relationship be- tween neonatal pain and internalizing behaviors at 18 months corrected age in children born very prematurely. Pain. 2013; 154(9):1831-9. Statement of Financial Support All authors have no financial relationships with commercial entities to disclose. FIGURE 1. FIGURE 2. • Parental examples of “Three words to describe your baby”: º Silly, quiet, explorer º Strong, beautiful, blessing º Feisty, precious, demanding º Mighty, determined, responsive (aware, receptive) References 1. Cherry A, Blucker R, Thornberry T, Hetherington, C, Mccaffree M A, & Gillaspy S. Postpartum depression screening in the neonatal intensive care unit: Program development, implementation, and lessons learned. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2016;59. 2. Gillaspy S, Tahirkheli N, Cherry A, Mccaffree M A, & Tackett A. Postpartum depression on the neonatal intensive care unit: current perspectives. International Journal of Women’s Health. 2014;975. 3. Griffin T & Celenza J. Family-Centered Care for the Newborn: The Delivery Room and Beyond. 2014; New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company, LLC. 4. Guillaume S, Michelin N, Amrani E, Benier B, Durrmeyer X, Lescure S, Caeymaex L. Parents’ expectations of staff in the early bonding process with their premature babies in the intensive care setting: A qualitative multicenter study with 60 parents. BMC Pediatrics. 2013:18. 5. Kearvell H & Grant J. Getting connected: How nurses can support mother/infant attachment in the neonatal intensive care unit. Australian Journal Of Advanced Nursing. 2010;27(3):75. 6. Paul C & Salo FT. The Baby as Subject: Clinical Studies in Infant-Parent Therapy. 2014; London: Karnac. 7. Slate A. Keeping the Baby in Mind: A Critical Factor in Perinatal Mental Health. Zero to Three. June/July 2001;10-16. 8. Orzalesi M & Aite L. Communication with parents in neonatal intensive care. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2011;24(Sup1):135-137. 9. Twohig A, Reulbach U, Figuerdo R, Mccarthy A, Mcnicholas F & Molloy E J. Supporting Preterm Infant Attachment and Socioemotional Development In The Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Staff Perceptions. Infant Mental Health Journal. 2016;37(2):160-171. Statement of Financial Support Jessica Bowen and Jean Powlesland have no financial relationships with com- mercial entities to disclose. NICU Baby Love Letters Continued from page 3 12 • 2018 • Developmental Observer Background Inconsistency in the application of neurodevelopmentally sup- portive practices continue to be reported in the literature with implementation described as sporadic, variable from setting to setting as well as from one professional to the next.1 Founda- tional education is recognized as a core component supporting the provision of care,2 yet clinicians frequently do not receive adequate training to differentiate the nuances of infant behav- ioral communication nor to implement practice change associ- ated with neuroprotective care.3 A gap continues to exist between high level specialist neurodevelopmental care training and the capacity for this training to be offered in all newborn settings. Foundational training programs offer an opportunity to train a broad population and establish a framework for specialization. Objectives • Identify the value for NIDCAP Training Centers to facilitate foundational developmental care education programs. • Consider how foundational education programs can help support practice change. Methods In 2017 a center in Australia implemented a foundational neuro- developmental care program designed and delivered by certified NIDCAP Professionals. The program is presented as an interac- tive 1.5 day workshop. Six essential themes are explored in the program which embraces a relationship-based approach to care. The themes include: • Development: Fetal and infant growth and development and the influence of experience on development. • Observation: The importance of seeing and responding to the baby in clinical practice. • Family: Family participation is essential for the successful implementation of neuroprotective care. • Reflection: Self-knowledge and learning through experience. • Systems: Strengths and challenges in work environments. • Evidence: Best available evidence to support neuroprotective care. Since its commencement in February 2017, 66 neona- tal unit staff (refer to figure one) have attended the program. Feedback from the program has been overwhelmingly supportive with expansion of the program in June 2017 to other states in Australia and to New Zealand. Program attendees were surveyed and asked to identify their level of confidence on a five-point Likert scale in delivering individualized developmentally sup- portive care prior to and immediately post completion of the training. Forty eight (72%) of the 66 attendees completed the survey. Nurses indicated the overall lowest level of confidence in delivering developmentally supportive care prior to undertaking the program 3.5/5 (average confidence level). Fifty two percent of respondents indicated a one point increase in confidence after completing the program, with 12% identifying a two point increase and 33% not identifying an effect on their confidence levels. The overall program was rated as very good by 81% of re- spondents with the remaining 18% rating the program as good. Eighty one percent of respondents identified they were likely to implement components from the program in their clinical practice or work environment. One hundred percent found the program content relevant to their profession and role in the newborn unit. Following completion of the program, participants are enrolled in a Graduate Group and sent a monthly newsletter and journal articles to promote ongoing engagement. A follow-up survey was circulated to program graduates three months after program completion to explore translation of program concepts to clinical practice and clinician/unit based promotion of prac- tice change. Two units in the follow up survey had implemented unit based developmental care work groups (Pediatric Intensive Care and Pediatric Cardiac Unit) to address practice inconsis- Implementing a Foundational Newborn Neurodevelopmental Education Program: One Center’s Experience Nadine Griffiths1, Kaye Spence1, Inga Warren2 and Monique Oude Reimer-vanKilsdonk3 1 Clinical Nurse Consultant, Grace Centre for Newborn Care, Sydney Children’s Hospital Network (Westmead) Australia 2 Senior NIDCAP Trainer affiliated with the UK NIDCAP Training Center, UCLH, London, UK 3 Registered Nurse and NIDCAP Consultant, Sophia NIDCAP Training Centre, Children’s Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands FIGURE 1. Outlines program attendance numbers for professional groups Developmental Observer • 2018 • 13 tencies and promote evidence based practice. A speech therapy department reviewed positioning of infants during procedures and incorporated supportive positioning techniques identified in the program. Respondents identified, ‘I personally have noticed a significant change in my daily nursing practice already’, ‘I see babies in ways I hadn’t noticed before’ and ‘this should be a program all staff in neonatal units attend’. Conclusions Implementation of a robust foundational neurodevelopmen- tal education program was found to reinvigorate staff interest in developmentally supportive practice, dispel myths and link evidence to clinical care, promote NIDCAP and raise the profile of a training center and its staff while also providing financial revenue to support maintenance of the center. References 1. Milette I, Martel MJ, Ribeiro da Silva M & Coughlin McNeil M. Guidelines for the institu- tional implementation of developmental neuroprotective care in the neonatal intensive care unit. part A: Background and rationale. A joint position statement from the CANN, CAP- WHN, NANN and COINN. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research. 2017; 49(2):46-62. 2. Milette I, Martel MJ, Ribeiro da Silva M & Coughlin McNeil M. Guidelines for the institu- tional implementation of developmental neuroprotective care in the neonatal intensive care unit. part B: Recommendations and justification. A joint position statement from the CANN, CAPWHN, NANN and COINN. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research. 2017; 49(2):46-62. 3. D’Agata AL, Sanders MR, Grasso DJ, Young EE, Cong X & McGrath JM. Unpacking the burden of care for infants in the NICU. Infant Mental Health Journal. 2017; 38(2):306-317. Statement of Financial Support Nadine Griffiths, Kaye Spence, Inga Warren, and Monique Oude Reimer-van Kilsdonk have no financial relationships with commercial entities to disclose. Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP) The Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP), originated in 1984 by Heidel- ise Als, PhD, is the only comprehensive, family centered, evidence-based approach to newborn developmental care. NIDCAP focuses on adapting the newborn intensive care nursery to the unique neurodevelopmental strengths and goals of each newborn cared for in this medical setting. These adaptations encompass the physical environment and its components, as well as, the care and treatment provided for the infant and his or her family, their life-long nurturers and supporters. Assessment of Preterm Infants’ Behavior (APIB) The Assessment of Preterm Infants’ Behavior (APIB) (Als et al., 1982) is a comprehensive and systematic research based neurobehavioral approach for the assessment of preterm and fullterm newborns. The APIB provides an invalu- able diagnostic resource for the advanced level clinician in support of developmental care provision in a nursery. NIDCAP Nursery Program The NIDCAP Nursery Program provides a comprehensive resource for the self- evaluation by a nursery system of its strengths and goals for integration of NIDCAP principles into all aspects of their functioning. Highly attuned implementa- tion of NIDCAP care for infants and their families, as well as for the staff, in a developmentally supportive environment is a goal as well as a process. External review and validation by the NFI may be sought when a nursery feels it has achieved this distinction. Nurseries that have achieved NIDCAP Nursery certification serve as a model and an inspiration to others. For information on the nursery self-assessment resources as well as the certification process and its eligibility requirements, please see: www.nidcap.org; and/or contact Rodd E. Hedlund, MEd, NIDCAP Nursery Program Director at: nnacpdirector@nidcap.org or 785-841-5440. The Gold Standard for Excellence in Newborn Individualized Developmental Care What All Newborn Infants and Their Families Deserve www.nidcap.org 14 • 2018 • Developmental Observer Neurobehavioral Disorganization (NBD) as a result of Targeted Newborn Echocardiography (TNE) in extremely preterm infants – a pilot study Asma Nosherwan1,2, Kumar Kumaran1,2 and Juzer M. Tyebkhan1,2 1 Stollery Children’s Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 2 University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Background Stress is a disturbance of the dynamic equilibrium between body systems and environment. Repeated stress, inherent in the new- born intensive care unit (NICU), is related to negative conse- quences for extremely preterm infants. Various tools are available to identify stressful responses to caregiving in the NICU. These tools could also help clinicians reduce the stress of various inter- ventions. Stress is inferred from the observation of neurobehav- ioral disorganization (NBD), although the different tools differ in their ability to recognize subtle signs of NBD. The Synactive Theory of Development provides a framework whereby changes in infant neurobehavior can be interpreted in the context of on- going interventions.1 The Newborn Individualized Developmen- tal Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP®) model of caregiv- ing is based on the Synactive Theory and requires caregivers to be observant of these subtle signs of NBD. Targeted Neonatal Echocardiography (TNE) is frequently used for cardiovascular management of extremely preterm infants. Methods to help infants experience less pain and stress during TNE include oral sucrose or sucking on a pacifier with or without facilitated tucking.2 It has been suggested that TNE is neither painful nor disruptive for preterm infants,3 however, our observations of very preterm infants undergoing TNE were that it often caused profound NBD, leading to this pilot study. Objective • Document NBD caused by TNE in extremely preterm infants. Methods A convenience sample included preterm infants born at less than 28 weeks gestational age, who underwent TNE when investigators were available. Infants were assessed using the NIDCAP® Natural- istic Observation and were video recorded before, during and after TNE. Neurobehavioral functioning and pain assessments were carried out using the Assessment of Behavioral Systems Organiza- tion (ABSO),4 the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain (BIIP),5 and the Astrid Lindgren and Lund Children’s Hospital Pain and Stress Assessment - Neonatal (ALPS-Neo).6 All TNE’s were per- formed by one investigator trained in TNE (AN). All neurobehav- ioral assessments were performed by another investigator certified in NIDCAP and APIB (Assessment of Preterm Infants' Behavior) (JMT). Bedside caregivers were not guided to provide neurobehav- ioral facilitation, but were free to provide whatever support they felt necessary. Mission The NFI promotes the advancement of the philosophy and science of NIDCAP care and assures the quality of NIDCAP education, training and certification for professionals and hospital systems. Adopted by the NFI Board, April 29, 2017 Vision The NFI envisions a global society in which all hospitalized newborns and their families receive care in the evidence-based NIDCAP model. NIDCAP supports development, enhances strengths and minimizes stress for infants, family and staff who care for them. It is individualized and uses a relationship-based, family-integrated approach that yields measurable outcomes. Adopted by the NFI Board, October 20, 2017 Developmental Observer • 2018 • 15 Results Seven infants born at 26 weeks or earlier were included in the study. Age at time of TNE varied from four days to five weeks. ABSO and ALPS-Neo scores indicated fairly high degrees of NBD at baseline. NIDCAP observations indicated NBD in- creased during and after TNE, although the numerical value of the scoring systems used for this study did not change signifi- cantly. For example: a) ABSO scores for Autonomic /Motor/State were values of 8/8/8 pre-TNE, increasing to 9/9/9 both during and post- TNE. b) ALPS-Neo scores were a value of 10 pre-TNE and remained 10 and 10 during and post-TNE. c) BIIP scores were difficult to assign accurately, as facial behav- iors which are a key part of this scoring were often not well seen due to bedding, TNE operator’s hands and/or the probe. Most babies entered the AA state (severe autonomic and motor dysregulation leading to removal from the sleep-wake state continuum) during TNE and many did not recover from the AA state post TNE. The BIIP does not include the AA state in its descriptors. ABSO and ALPS-Neo do include AA state, but many babies were already at scores of 10, the maximal possible score, for reasons such as motor flaccidity; thus moving into the AA state did not increase their score. Conclusions a) More attentive, individualized supportive care is required at baseline for very preterm infants in the NICU, given the high scores reflective of pre-TNE NBD. b) TNE was associated with increased NBD in the extremely preterm infant, which was often due to the infant entering the AA state. c) The scoring systems used in this pilot study were not sensitive enough to accurately portray the increased NBD. The following actions will be considered in the future: 1) Determine the most accurate method of documenting NBD during TNE, keeping in mind assessment methods should recognize the AA state as that of profound NBD. 2) Disseminate results to clinicians using TNE in their practice. 3) Provide caregiver support tailored to individualized, dynamic neurobehavioral status during TNE as this may prevent the severe NBD that was observed. The recently published Valid- ity and Reliability of the Evaluation of Intervention Scale (EVIN tool) may be useful as a means of providing such facilitation, and will be the subject of further study.7 References 1. Als H. Toward a synactive theory of development. Infant Mental Health Journal. 1982; 3(4):229-243. 2. Potana NT, Dongara AR, Nimbalkar SM, Patel DV, Nimbalkar AS, Phatak. Oral sucrose for pain in neonates during echocardiography. Indian Pediatrics. 2015;52(6):493-497. 3. Lavoie PM, Stritzke A, Ting J, Jabr M, Jain A, Kwan E, Chakkarapani E, Brooks P, Brant R, McNamara PJ, Holsti L. RCT of use of oral glucose with or without gentle facilitated tucking of infants during neonatal echocardiography. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0141015. 4. Als H. Assessment of behavioral system’s organization. NIDCAP Federation International, 2006. 5. Holstii L & Grunau RE. Initial validation of the behavioral indicators of infant pain (BIIP). Pain. 2007; 132(3):264-272. 6. Lundquist P, Kleberg A, Edberg AK, Larsson BA, Hellstrom-Westas L, Norman E. Develop- ment and psychometric properties of the Swedish ALPS-Neo pain and stress assessment scale for newborn infants. Acta Paediatrica. 2014;103(8):833-839. 7. Warren I, Hicks B, Kleberg A, Ellahoo J, Anand KJ, Hickson M. Validity and reliability of the evaluation of intervention scale: preliminary report. Acta Pediatrica. 2016;105(6):618-622. Statement of Financial Support The authors have no financial relationships with commercial entities to disclose. The NFI thanks its current sponsor, Dr. Brown's for their continued support which helps the NFI raise global awareness of the need for NIDCAP care and enhances opportunities to develop educational programs to broaden the reach of this care to more and more NICU professionals and the ‘preterm families’ they serve. For decades, parents have relied on Dr. Brown’s® products to make sure their babies receive the best nutrition from the start, including longtime- favorite Natural Flow Bottles that help reduce feeding problems like colic, spit-up, burping and gas. Now, the new Dr. Brown’s® Medical product line extends the same Dr. Brown’s® healthy benefits to families with babies who have feeding issues, in addition to the medical professionals who play a critical role in infant development. Our Current Sponsor 16 • 2018 • Developmental Observer Background The burden of stress the human body endures during critical periods of development is postulated as having implications in the development of later life mental health and physical illnesses.1-3 Risks from early life developmental adversity are linked to later life illnesses and diseases of the cardiovascular and endocrine systems, as well as mental health illness.4-8 An early life stress experience that often receives inadequate attention, yet may be of consider- able later life consequence, is the caregiving environment of the newborn intensive care unit (NICU). While NICU care is often lifesaving, the intensity and chronicity of these experiences are evolutionarily unexpected and occur during a period of develop- mental vulnerability. Stress exposure from necessary care in the newborn intensive care unit (NICU) can have profound effects on infant brain development. Interpreting neurodevelopmental effects from adverse early life experiences in the NICU can be challenging. Objectives • Explore whether established term infant neurobehavioral profiles may be used to characterize a preterm NICU infant cohort. • Examine the potential of longitudinal NICU stress exposure to further discriminate profiles. Methods A sample of 41 preterm NICU infants, previously described in the primary study,9 was analyzed for stress exposure and neurodevel- opmental functioning. The primary study explored the relation- ships between neurodevelopmental outcomes at NICU discharge, FKBP5 genotype and NICU stress exposure. An established algo- rithm was applied to investigate membership of preterm infants at near term age within three neurobehavioral profiles. Total 21-day and weekly average stress were also examined and found to be cor- related to infant neurobehavioral profiles. Descriptive demographic data and stress data were ana- lyzed using IBM© SPSS® Statistics, version 22.0. The NNNS neurobehavioral profiles were analyzed using the algorithm in R statistical software.10 Finally, multivariate analysis was used to discriminate the probability of NISS stress scores by week (week one, week two, week three) to predict if the preterm profiles were similar to the healthy infant profiles. Results There were significant differences in the distribution of member- ship within the developmental profiles between preterm infants and healthy full-term infants. An interaction was found between the membership with the three profiles and time within mean range of stress value. Using Pearson Chi-Square test, there was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.02) in the distribution of neurobehavioral profiles between the sample of preterm NICU infants and the comparison to the healthy full-term infant sample from the Sucharew study11. While statistically significant results were not detected (p = 0.11) for preterm infants in the mean value for 21 days of stress across the three profiles, the mean stress score was lowest for the preterm infants categorized into Profile 1 (social/easy-going) and the highest mean stress scores for infants categorized into Profile 2 (hypotonic). There was a statistically significant interaction (p = 0.03) between the three neurobehavioral profiles and the mean value of weekly average stress. Conclusions Preterm infants’ neurobehavioral functioning may be classified with these neurodevelopmental profiles to better understand the influence of early life experiences. Interestingly, the comparison of preterm profiles to the term profiles identified by Sucharew et al.,11 demonstrates a reversed yet near exact matched percent- age of Profile 1 (easy-going) and Profile 2 (hypotonic), while the Profile 3 (difficult) percentage remains consistent between the two groups. Stress exposure in the NICU has the potential to discriminate NNNS profile membership. References 1. Shonkoff JP, Garner AS, Siegel BS, et al. The lifelong effects of early childhood adversity and toxic stress. Pediatrics. 2012; 129(1):e232-e246. 2. Daskalakis NP, Bagot RC, Parker KJ, Vinkers CH, de Kloet ER. The three-hit concept of vulnerability and resilience: towards understanding adaptation to early-life adversity outcome. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013; 38(9):1858-1873. 3. McLaughlin KA, Sheridan MA, Alves S, Mendes WB. Child maltreatment and autonomic nervous system reactivity: identifying dysregulated stress reactivity patterns using the biopsy- chosocial model of challenge and threat. Psychosomatic Medicine. 2014; 76(7):538-546. 4. Goosby BJ, Cheadle JE, McDade T. Birth weight, early life course BMI, and body size change: chains of risk to adult inflammation? Social Science & Medicine. 2016; 148:102-109. 5. Kemppainen KM, Ardissone AN, Davis-Richardson AG, et al. Early childhood gut micro- biomes show strong geographic differences among subjects at high risk for type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015; 38(2):329-332. 6. Johnson S, Wolke D. Behavioural outcomes and psychopathology during adolescence. Early Human Development. 2013; 89(4):199-207. 7. Godfrey KM, Costello PM, Lillycrop KA. The developmental environment, epigenetic bio- markers and long-term health. Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease. 2015; 6(5):399-406. 8. Heindel JJ, Balbus J, Birnbaum L, et al. Developmental origins of health and disease: integrat- ing environmental influences. Endocrinology. 2015; 156(10):3416-3421. 9. D'Agata AL, Walsh S, Vittner D, Cong X, McGrath JM, Young EE. FKBP5 Genotype and early life stress exposure predict neurobehavioral outcomes for preterm infants. Developmental Psychobiology. 2017; 59(3):410-418. 10. Team RC. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. 2015; https://www.R- project.org. 11. Sucharew H, Khoury JC, Xu Y, Succop P, Yolton K. NICU network neurobehavioral scale profiles predict developmental outcomes in a low-risk sample. Paediatric and Perinatal Epide- miology. 2012; 26(4):344-352. Statement of Financial Support The authors have no financial relationships with commercial entities to disclose. Comparison of Established Neurobehavioral Profiles for Healthy Infants to Preterm NICU Infants Amy D’Agata1,2, Stephen Walsh1, Dorothy Vittner1,3 and Jacqueline M. McGrath1,3 1 University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA 2 University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA 3 Connecticut Children’s Medical Center, Hartford, Connecticut, USA Developmental Observer • 2018 • 17 Background Parental presence and active participation in caregiving improves both short- and long-term outcomes for preterm infants requir- ing NICU care.1,2 Parents with higher levels of engagement also experience benefits, including lower rates of depression, reduced levels of stress, increased confidence in parenting and responsive- ness to infant cues, and improved attachment to their infant when compared to parents whose NICU presence is limited.3,4 The provision of free parking is one means of helping parents to be active partners in the care of their infant. It is also one of sev- eral accessibility interventions described in the NIDCAP Nurs- ery Assessment and Certification Program’s (NNACP) Nursery Assessment Manual.5 There has been limited research into this intervention to date.6 No association has been found between the provision of free parking, increased parental presence, and length of stay but there are confounding variables which limit the ap- plicability of this particular study. Objectives • Provide rationale for the following: o Active parental participation in care should be considered part of the treatment provided for preterm infants. o Facilitating parents’ presence in the NICU should be a high priority objective for improving care and outcomes. o Free parking is one method which may increase parental presence and participation in care. • Describe strategies used in our attempts to acquire free park- ing for parents. • Describe the work in progress and our plans to achieve this goal. Methods A previous attempt to secure free parking was made in 2011 during the first World Prematurity Day. Presentations were given on this topic and a petition was signed by families and staff at all NICU sites across the city. Unfortunately, systemic changes at senior management levels meant the petition was not presented to the appropriate authorities and free parking was not made available for families. This initiative became a priority project in 2016 for our NICU Family Advisory Council Team (FACT), which includes parents and staff working on various initiatives through a pro- gressive and collaborative approach. Our first task was to gather data regarding parking use and parental perceptions. Parents are currently eligible for discounted monthly parking passes for sale at $71CAD. This compares to the daily parking charge of $14.25CAD. We performed a cross-sectional survey of parents with infants admitted in two level 3 NICUs. Survey Results: Of 51 families who completed the survey: • 38 (74.5%) used the hospital parkade regularly during their infant’s hospitalization. • 25 (65.8%) of those parents paid for parking by the month at some point. • At least one parent spent an average of 7.3 hours per day with their infant (range 2-24 hours). • The cost of parking affected the duration of time spent with their infant for at least one parent in 14 (34.1%) families. • The cost of parking affected the frequency of visits to the NICU for at least one parent in 12 (29.3%) families. Participants stated obtaining monthly passes was compli- cated, given the unexpected and emergent obstetrical admission for some. They also described the parking office as difficult to find, located outside of the main hospital, and having restrictive hours of operation. In addition to this survey, free parking has been discussed in several other forums, leading to this topic be- ing placed on our hospital’s Operational Plan and Priority list of key issues. We have also partnered with the Pediatric Cardiology FACT to form a joint working group to address this subject. Conclusion We identified parking is a barrier to parental presence and active participation in care of their infant. A joint working group was created to carry this initiative forward. The joint working group will: • Establish criteria for free parking and a consistent process for distribution of passes. • Investigate sources of funding, including corporate and foun- dation sponsorship. • Streamline the parking process and work towards an elec- tronic parking system. • Plan an audit to determine whether free parking increases pa- rental participation in care and improves outcomes for infants and families. • Plan an economic evaluation to determine whether free park- ing leads to overall cost savings to the health care system. Free Parking for Parents of Infants in the Newborn Intensive Care Unit (NICU): A Collaborative Approach with Families J Ryan Yuen, Catherine Ward, Kim Tilley, Laura Hess, Jag Bhogal and Juzer M Tyebkhan Stollery Children’s Hospital and Royal Alexandra Hospital Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada 18 • 2018 • Developmental Observer Background Preterm infants often require additional care and support after discharge and are at higher risk of neurodevelopmental dis- abilities.1-3 Parents of preterm infants have a higher risk for short and long-term mental health issues (anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder) during newborn intensive care unit (NICU) stays and following discharge.1-3 These issues can negatively impact the parent-infant dynamic.1-4 The period im- mediately following NICU discharge is critical for parents as they navigate from the highly supportive NICU environment to an often-isolated home environment.1-3 Objective • Investigate parental perceptions of supports and services avail- able following NICU discharge, including an exploration of how existing services could be improved and what commu- nity supports are perceived to be lacking. Methods A qualitative descriptive research design with secondary analysis was employed using two study groups: 1) 13 participants (11 mothers and 2 fathers; 2 couples) with preterm infants born at less than 32 weeks gestational age and, 2) 14 participants (8 mothers and 6 fathers; 6 couples) with preterm infants born at 32-37weeks gestational age. At the time of the study, the infants were 3-12 months post-discharge. A combination of purposeful and convenience sampling was used. Individuals participated in focus groups with a semi-structured question guide. Thematic analysis of the data was conducted. (See figure 1) Results Two main themes were identified in the groups: Parenting Outside the Norm & Imagining Supportive Communities (Figure 1). The themes spanned the continuum of parental expe- rience from the NICU to home to community. Parents perceived their experiences of loss, fear, separation and trauma made them vulnerable to mental illness. They, how- ever, often did not see their health as a priority, particularly after discharge when their infant’s interests were consistently placed above their own. “…You tend to ignore yourself… I’ll deal with me later.” (Parent 1, Mother, FG 2). Encouragement from NICU staff to seek out support was looked upon favorably. “It really feels like you can’t talk to anybody else, when you are in the NICU…” (Parent 4, Mother, FG1, GP1). Participants identified peer and emotional support as a need in the NICU and community. Parents reported self-imposed social isolation because of fears of illness and the lack of under- standing of people who had not experienced preterm birth. “…when you come home you kind of start to process all those feelings and… the trauma of feeling like not knowing if your baby’s going to live, you know. And that’s… something that other moms don’t necessarily understand, that sort of trauma.” (Parent 2, Mother, FG 1, GP1). Belonging to support groups helped parents by providing them with hope, encouragement and reassurance; by build- ing their confidence, validating their concerns and providing concrete advice for specific questions. Some found this “experi- ential knowledge” was “…more useful than [coming from] a health expert” (Parent 3, Mother, FG 1) to address “…specific mom-type questions” (Parent 2, Mother, FG 1). Parents often perceived community services to lack expertise in preterm infants. “…he was 2.5 months old and I took him to public health for a Support for Parents of Preterm Infants Post-NICU Discharge JM Toye1,2,6, X Qiu3,4, T Alvadj-Korenic2,5, K Long1, A Reichert1,2 and K Staub6 1 Stollery Children’s Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 2 University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 3 Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 4 University of Toronto, Department of Pediatrics, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 5 Women & Children’s Health Research Institute, Canada 6 Canadian Premature Babies Foundation • Design further studies to identify other barriers to parental participation in care of their infant and interventions to remove these barriers. References 1. Jefferies AL. Kangaroo care for the preterm infant and family. Paediatrics and Child Health. 2012; 17(3):141–143. 2. Flacking R, Lehtonen L, Thomson G, Axelin A, Ahlqvist S, Moran VH, Ewald U, Dykes F. Closeness and separation in neonatal intensive care. Acta Paediatrica. 2012; 101(10):1032-1037. 3. Ionio C, Colombo C, Brazzoduro V, Mascheroni E, Confalonieri E, Castoldi F, Lista G. Moth- ers and fathers in NICU: The impact of preterm birth on parental distress. European Journal of Psychology. 2016; 12(4):604-621. 4. Larsson C, Wågström U, Normann E, Thernström Blomqvist Y. Parents’ experiences of discharge readiness from a Swedish neonatal intensive care unit. Nursing Open. 2017; 4(2):90-95. 5. Smith K, Buehler D, & Als H. Nursery Assessment Manual. 2008, rev 2011, Boston, Mass: NIDCAP Federation International, Inc. June 2011. http://nidcap.org/wp-content/up- loads/2013/11/NNCCS-Manual-7Jul11.pdf. 6. Northrup TF, Evans PW, Lillie ML, Tyson JE. A free parking trial to increase visitation and im- prove extremely low birth weight infant outcomes. Journal of Perinatology. 2016; 36(12):1112- 1115. Statement of Financial Support J Ryan Yuen, Catherine Ward, Kim Tilley, Laura Hess, Jag Bhogal and Juzer M Tyebkhan have no financial relationships with commercial entities to disclose. Developmental Observer • 2018 • 19 weight and he was down a little bit. And they were like, maybe it was because of his umbilical cord. I was like, he is 2.5 months old – his umbilical cord fell off at 2 weeks old - like read the chart! You know, it was frustrating. So I stopped taking him in altogether and got myself a scale at home … it was really frus- trating to deal with people who didn’t get the preemie thing.” (Parent 3, Mother, FG3, GP1). Lastly, some fathers perceived the NICU environment to be predominately maternal-oriented. Conclusions The study findings provide insight into the support parents need following discharge. Peer and emotional support were identi- fied as particular areas of need. Further studies that focus on strengthening existing community resources and integrating peer support are recommended. References 1. Boykova M. Transition from hospital to home in preterm infants and their families. The Jour- nal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing. 2016; 30(3):270-272. 2. Brecht CJ, Shaw RJ, St John NH, Horwitz SM. Effectiveness of therapeutic and behavioral in- terventions for parents of low-birth-weight premature infants: A review. Infant Mental Health Journal. 2012; 33(6):651-665. 3. Howe TH, Sheu CF, Wang TN, Hsu YW. Parenting stress in families with very low birth weight preterm infants in early infancy. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 2014; 35(7):1748-1756. 4. Adama EA, Bayes S, Sundin D. Parents' experiences of caring for preterm infants after discharge from Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A meta-synthesis of the literature. Journal of Neonatal Nursing. 2016; 22(1):27-51. Acknowledgments We applied the SDC approach for the sequence of authors. We are grateful for the funding and mentorship of Dr. Shoo Lee from Mount Sinai Hospital and for the expertise and study promotion from the Canadian Premature Babies Foundation. We are thank- ful to the Edmonton Neonatal Research Group for assistance in recruitment and Alberta Health Services for the facilities to conduct our research. This research was facilitated by the Women and Children’s Health Research Institute through the generous support of the Stollery Children's Hospital Foundation. Statement of Financial Support The authors have no financial relationships with commercial entities to disclose. FIGURE 1. 20 • 2018 • Developmental Observer Background All infants have important sleep needs, and those born prema- turely have their own unique set of sleep habits and needs that are different from those of a full-term baby. Sleep is essential for organizing and maturing the brain in premature infants; it also plays a role in maintaining the natural balance between different nervous system centers. Dr. Heidelise Als' Synactive Theory and the NIDCAP model of care were presented at the 1st International NIDCAP Workshop held in Al-Zahara Hospital in Isfahan, Iran in October 2013. Objective • Assess the effect of a sleep care educational program on the nurses’ knowledge and practice in the Newborn Intensive Care Nursery (NICN). Methods In this quasi experimental pre-post test study structured into three stages, 35 nurses working in a NICN in Isfahan, Iran, were included. The newborn sleep care educational program included oral presentation sessions with questions and answers followed by nurses’ exposure to sleep posters and booklets in the NICN. Data was collected by a nurses’ knowledge questionnaire hav- ing shown validity and reliability through content validity and internal consistency respectively. The questionnaire consisted of 40 multiple choice questions asked prior to, immediately after, and one month after the education program was implemented. Nurses’ practice was evaluated prior to and one month after the educational intervention using a 15 multiple choice question- naire. Data was analyzed by descriptive and inferential statistics using the SPSS16 software. Results Results revealed the mean score of nurses’ knowledge imme- diately and one month after the educational intervention was significantly increased as compared to prior to the intervention, 33.33(4.4) vs. 19.33 (4.1) (P < 0.001). The score of nurses’ prac- tice was slightly improved following the educational intervention although it did not show any significant differences (P = 0.07, 42.6 (7.6) vs. 45.1 (7.8)). Conclusions According to the results of this study, this method of education could lead to a significant increase in nurses’ knowledge; however it did not significantly improve their practice. This may be due to the low number of educational sessions; therefore, we recom- mended to NICN administration to invest in a long-term con- tinuous educational program on premature infants’ sleep care to enhance nurses’ performance. Lastly, this education may result in nurses’ support to create a quiet environment to promote good sleep in premature infants and improve their brain development, as well as to decrease infants’ developmental problems due to insufficient sleep in the noisy and crowded NICN with excessive handling and distracting procedures by staff. According to the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), premature infants may sleep for as many as 22 hours a day, but only for about an hour at a time. Also according to the NIDCAP model, states of consciousness (sleep & awake) are an important component in the NICN. Nurses have an important role in cre- ating a quiet environment in which premature infants have the greatest opportunity for good sleep and improved brain develop- ment. We recommend the NICN administration continues their efforts to improve nurses’ knowledge and practice by scheduling appropriate sleep care educational programs as long-term con- tinuing education. References 1. Hockenberry MJ, Wilson D, Wong DL. Wong’s Essentials of Pediatric Nursing [Book on CD ROM]. 9th ed. USA: Elsevier; 2011:493-4. 2. Als H. Newborn individualized developmental care and assessment program (NIDCAP): New frontier for neonatal and perinatal medicine. Journal of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine. 2009; 2:135-47. 3. Kenner C, Mcgrath J. Developmental Care of Newborns & Infants [Book on CD ROM]. Ari- zona: Catherine Albright Jackson; 2004:43-50. 4. Ludington Hoe SM, Johnson MW, Morgan K, Lewis T, Gutman J, Wilson PD, et al. Neuro- physiologic assessment of neonatal sleep organization: Preliminary results of a randomized, controlled trial of skin contact with preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2006;117:909-23. 5. Allen KA. Promoting and protecting infant sleep. Advances in Neonatal Care. 2012;12:288-91. 6. Duran R, Ciftdemir NA, Ozbek UV, Berberoglu U, Durankus F, Süt N, et al. The effects of noise reduction by earmuffs on the physiologic and behavioral responses in very low birth weight preterm infants. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 2012;76:1490-3. 7. Tarullo AR, Balsam PD, Fifer WP. Sleep and infant learning. Infant and Child Development. 2011;20:35-46. 8. Verklan MT, Walden M. Core Curriculum for Neonatal Intensive Care Nursing [Book on CD ROM]. 4th ed. USA: W.B. Saunders, Elsevier; 2010:210-4. 9. Westrup B. Newborn individualized developmental care and assessment program (NIDCAP) – Family centered developmentally supportive care. Early Human Development. 2007;83:443-9. 10. Laudert S, Liu WF, Blackington S, Perkins B, Martin S, Macmillan York E, et al. Implement- ing potentially better practices to support the neurodevelopment of infants in the NICU. Journal of Perinatology. 2007;27 Suppl 2:S75-93. The Effect of a Sleep Care Educational Program on Nurses’ Knowledge and Practice in Newborn Intensive Care Nursery (NICN) Marzieh Hasanpour1, Fatemeh Farashi 2, Majid Mohammadizadeh 3 and Zahra Abdeyazdan 4 1 NIDCAP Professional, Pediatric and Newborn Intensive Care Nursing Department, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran 2 Student Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran 3 Department of Neonatology, Medical School, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran 4 Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran Developmental Observer • 2018 • 21 Background The Royal Alexandra Hospital (RAH) is a tertiary perinatal center with an annual delivery rate of more than 7,000 births. The newborn intensive care unit (NICU) promotes family- centered care, minimizing parent-infant separation and pro- moting breastfeeding. Preterm infants, however, often receive parenteral nutrition for extended periods of time and experience delayed initiation of oral feedings including breastfeeding. One of the reasons for this is staff reluctance to orally feed infants on non-invasive breathing support such as nasal continuous posi- tive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment. Early initiation of oral feeding is associated with increased breastfeeding success, and oral feeding while on CPAP has been safely applied in Canada and internationally.1 Currently the RAH NICU does not have an oral feeding guideline. A retrospective chart review of infants less than 33 6/7 weeks gestation discharged from the RAH NICU in 2014 indicated fewer than 10% were exclusively breastfed on discharge. Only 50% of infants exclusively received breast milk, 25% were exclusively formula fed and 25% were fed a combina- tion of breast milk and formula. Objectives • Implement an oral feeding guideline to promote Positive Oral Experiences Training (POETri) for infants receiving respiratory support and thereby increase breastfeeding rates at discharge. • Decrease the age of preterm infants’ first nuzzle at the breast. • Decrease the age of the first breast feeding for preterm infants. Method The POETri team used the QI steps of Plan, Do, Study, and Act. We created, piloted, and revised a data collection and auditing form to identify baseline data, current gaps, and targets as well as track project progress and outcomes. Baseline data were collected on 91 preterm infants born at less than 29 weeks to guide imple- mentation of POETri. Time to first nuzzle and first breastfeeding were identified as occurring much later than expected; these were identified as initial targets to achieve the longer-term goal of increased breast feeding rates at discharge. The Feeding Babies in SINC (Safe, Individualized Nipple- Feeding Competence) algorithm was developed in Calgary as a QI Project over the last five years and is being adopted in several NICUs in Canada and the United States.1 Our Team collabo- rated with the team in Calgary in reviewing and selecting the algorithm for piloting in Edmonton. Training workshops were held with POETri team members and 20 NICU clinical team members were identified as “POETri Champions”. Orientation POETri – Positive Oral Experiences Training: A quality improvement project to foster oral skill development in preterm infants Matt Hicks on behalf of the POETri Steering Committee, Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada 11. Jan JE, Asante KO, Conry JL, Fast DK, Bax MC, Ipsiroglu OS, et al. Sleep health issues for children with FASD: Clinical considerations. International Journal of Pediatrics. 2010;2010. pii: 639048. 12. Calciolari G, Montirosso R. The sleep protection in the preterm infants. Journal of Maternal- Fetal Neonatal Medicine. 2011;24 Suppl 1:12-4. 13. Miyazaki MY, Caliri MH, dos Santos CB. Knowledge on pressure ulcer prevention among nursing professionals. Revista Latino-Americana Enfermagem. 2010;18:1203-11. 14. Mohammed SR, Bayoumi MH, Mahmoud FS. The effect of developmentally supportive care training program on nurses’ performance and behavioral responses of newborn infants. Egypt: Pediatric Nursing Faculty of Nursing Benha University; 2014. 15. Ahmed GE, Mohammad HA, Assiri MH, Ameri AN. Effect of instructional sessions on nurses’ and doctors’ knowledge and practice regarding developmental care in NICU in Abha City. Journal of Education and Practice. 2013;4:49-58. 16. Goudarzi Z, Tefaq MR, Monjamed Z, Memari A. Impact on the knowledge and practice of neonatal special care for training nurses in pediatric units. Journal of Hayat. 2004;10:25 31. 17. Ahmed AH. Breastfeeding preterm infants: An educational program to support mothers of preterm infants in Cairo, Egypt. Pediatric Nursing. 2008;34:125-30, 138. 18. Liaw JJ, Yang L, Chang LH, Chou HL, Chao SC. Improving neonatal caregiving through a developmentally supportive care training program. Applied Nursing Research. 2009;22:86-93. 19. Hadian Shirazi Z, Kargar M, Edraki M, Ghaem H, Pishva N. The effect of instructing the prin- ciples of endotracheal tube suctioning on knowledge and performance of nursing staff working in neonatal intensive care units. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2010;9(4):365-370. 20. Day T, Wainwright SP, Wilson Barnett J. An evaluation of a teaching intervention to improve the practice of endotracheal suctioning in intensive care units. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2001;10:682-96. 21. Godarzi Z, Rahimi O, Khalesi N, Soleimani F, Mohammadi N, Shamshiri AR. The rate of developmental care delivery in neonatal intensive care unit. Iran Journal of Critical Care Nurs- ing. 2015;8:117-24. Acknowledgments The authors wish to express their gratitude to all nurses of the NICN in Al-Zahara Medical Center in Isfahan for their generous consent to take part in the study. They also express appreciation to the Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center and Vice Chancellery for Research at Isfahan University of Medical Sci- ences for funding the reported thesis and research project (No: 393760) and for their support of this study. Statement of Financial Support The authors have no financial relationships with commercial entities to disclose. 22 • 2018 • Developmental Observer lunch and learn sessions were provided to bedside nurses to train staff in the POETri Project and SINC algorithm. A pilot of the POETri program was then conducted for two months with 20 infants born at less than 29 weeks gestation. Team members used the SINC algorithm to teach nurses and parents to recognize feeding engagement and disengagement cues. Results There was a high degree of concern and discomfort with the idea of feeding infants on CPAP and non-invasive respiratory support. It took much longer than anticipated to introduce the POETri project and concept of feeding on CPAP to the bedside staff and increase their level of comfort to the point that the POETri project could proceed. Collaboration with the team from Calgary was crucial in increasing the comfort of staff mem- bers with the concept of POETri and SINC. The POETri project encouraged team-orientated decision making on progression through the SINC algorithm. Infant- driven strategies and clearly outlined algorithms provide clar- ity and predictability related to care to all team members and parents and encourages communication. There can be a tendency to change the feeding method back to prior practice if infants are viewed as not progressing as quickly as desired. Infants, who transitioned to the current unit standard of semi-demand feeding methology when they are not ready, had recurrent episodes of regurgitation and greater vari- ability in volume intake as compared with infants who advanced more systematically through the SINC algorithm (see Figure 1). Key results of the POETri pilot: • The first feeding for 100% of the infants in the POETri group occurred at the breast versus 40% in the pre-POETri group. • First nuzzle at the breast occurred at an average earlier age of 786.3 hours in the POETri group as compared to 1454.2 hours in the pre-POETri group. This means mothers could put their babies to the breast to nuzzle four weeks earlier in the POETri group. • First oral feeding at the breast occurred at an average earlier age of 1118.4 hours in the POETri group as compared to 1477.0 hours in the pre-POETri group. This means mothers could have their babies feeding at the breast 15 days earlier in the POETri group. Conclusions The POETri project supported parents to be more involved in the care of their babies and to engage in nuzzling at the breast a month earlier. For the mother of a baby born at 24 weeks, this is the difference between having the first opportunity to have her baby nuzzle at six weeks of age rather than ten weeks. There is a much higher rate of transfer from the RAH NICU to intermediate care NICUs than is commonly recog nized. Projects aimed at attaining a specific outcome by discharge may need implemented across a region rather than at one site. In subsequent iterations of this QI project, the rate of breastfeeding at discharge will be ascertained once the algorithm is introduced to all NICUs in the Edmonton radius for transfers. References 1. Dalgleish SR, Kostecky LL & Blachly N. Eating in “SINC”: Safe individualized nipple- feeding competence, a quality improvement project to explore infant-driven oral feeding for very premature infants requiring noninvasive respiratory support. Neonatal Network. 2016; 35(4):217-227. Acknowledgements The author acknowledges the members of POETri group, W. Rea, and N. Lifeso. This work was supported by a grant from Alberta Health Service’s Quality Improvement Fund. Statement of Financial Support Matt Hicks and the members of the POETri Steering Committee have no financial relationships with commercial entities to disclose. V o lu m e o f fe ed s (m Ls ) Corrected Gestational Age (weeks) Individual consecutive feeds over time * direct breast feeding opportunities FIGURE 1. Typical pattern of feedings for an infant using the SINC algorithm and changed to semi-demand feedings at 38 weeks post-menstrual age (PMA). Developmental Observer • 2018 • 23 About World Prematurity Day Celebrated internationally on November 17th, World Prematurity Day (WPD) acknowledges the journeys of preterm infants and their families as well as raises awareness of the challenges faced by children born preterm and their families. Purple is the symbolic color of WPD representing sensitivity and individuality, two of the characteristics of the premature infant. Please Join Us In honor of World Prematurity Day 2018 the NIDCAP Federation International (NFI) invites you to pay tribute to newborns, and to their families, nursery staff and hospitals around the world who provide essential NIDCAP care. It is not too early to begin planning for your WPD 2018 celebrations. A popular way to spread the word is through the purple illumination of landmarks in your communities and the purple illumination of hospital websites. The National NIDCAP Training Center in Boston, Massachusetts has arranged for the lighting of the Zakim Bridge which is traversed by tens of thousands of people every day, and the NFI hopes that each training center will arrange for a similar marking of the day whether it be the lighting of a bridge, a government building, your hospital’s website, your NICU’s webpage, or your community’s local newspaper (print or electronic version). Please consider contacting the programs in your communities that can execute such “illuminations”. Other suggestions for celebrating the day: • Send the NFI’s WPD information sheet to your local news agencies to inspire a story about preterm birth; • Sponsor activities for the parents of preemies in your newborn intensive care units and/or your communities; • Coordinate an educational workshop for your NICU staff on the sensitivities and individuality of preterm infants; We encourage you to mark World Prematurity Day in your own special way. NFI Celebrates World Prematurity Day November 17, 2018 Sheraton Porto Hotel & Spa Rua Tenente Valadim, 146, 4100-476 Porto, Portugala Annual NFI Membership Meeting Sunday, October 21, 2018 1:30PM – 3:30PM Sheraton Porto Hotel & Spa Rua Tenente Valadim, 146, 4100-476 Porto, Portugal Hosted by the São João NIDCAP Training Center, Porto, Portugal (By Invitation Only) The 29th Annual NIDCAP Trainers Meeting October 20-23, 2018 http://nidcap.org/en/nfi-news/world-prematurity-day-2018/ 24 • 2018 • Developmental Observer Developmental Observer The Official Newsletter of the NIDCAP® Federation International To download the Developmental Observer please go to: nidcap.org 2018 Vol. 11 No. 1 NIDCAP Federation International (NFI)Founded in 2001, the NFI is an international, non-profit membership organization. The NFI encourages the implementation of developmental care and assures the quality of the Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP) approach in all intensive, special care and newborn nurseries around the world. The NFI serves as the authoritative leader for research, development, and dissemination of NIDCAP, and for the certification of trainers, healthcare professionals, and nurseries in the NIDCAP approach. Developmental Observer The Official Newsletter of the NIDCAP® Federation International ““When I approach a child, [the child] inspires in me two sentiments – tenderness for what [the child] is and respect for what [the child] may become.” Louis Pasteur NICU Baby Love Letters The NFI’S Annual Abstract Issue In this issue, we publish the abstracts presented at our 28th Annual NIDCAP Trainers Meeting in Edmonton, Canada, October 21-24, 2018. The peer review process led by NIDCAP Trainer Linda Lacina, MSN, RN, HN-BC selected abstracts for presentation based on their relevance, innovation, results, insightfulness and overall clarity and content. Abstracts include: Newborn Intensive Care Nursery (NICN) Initiatives (“Baby Love Letters”, free parental parking, family mentor program, rounding with parents, and surgical NICU skin to skin care); Education (foundational neurode- velopmental care program, Positive Oral Experiences Training, sleep care nursing educational program, NIDCAP mentored educational program); Research (neu- robehavioral profile preterm and full-term comparisons, maternal administration of the EDIN Pain Scale, and neurobehavioral disorganization); and Beyond the NICN (Newborn Bridge Clinic, developmental care, and parental support). This body of work reflects our members’ and their colleagues’ wealth of knowledge, scientific curiosity, experience and creativity. We are enriched by learning from one another as we continue to evolve our NIDCAP model and its implementation for future generations. The Developmental Observer’s Editors welcome your comments and feedback. Jessica Bowen and Jean Powlesland University of Illinois Medical Center at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois Background In supporting the relationship between parents and their baby, it’s important for providers in the newborn intensive care unit (NICU) to understand how par- ents view their baby. Research shows a parent’s view of their child will impact how they interact and how they parent. Many parents start to imagine and attach to their baby while the baby is still in the womb. This time is shortened for NICU parents, sometimes nearly in half. It is critical to understand how a NICU parent views their child, how they imagine who the baby already is and to help them create a rich and full understanding of their child’s strengths and challenges in the NICU and beyond. As we support NIDCAP, the University of Illinois (UI) Health NICU created Baby Love Letters written from the voice of the newborn to help parents bond, understand and support their baby while in the NICU. Objectives • Help parents develop an understanding of their infant’s unique experience in the NICU. Continued on page 2 Table of ContentsIntroduction ............................................... 1 Abstracts .................................................... 1 Meetings and Conferences .................... 18 NIDCAP on the Web ................................ 20 ABSTRACT EDITION Christyn Davis reading a love letter from her daughter, Cailynn NIDCAP Federation International Board of Directors and Staff 2017–2018 President Deborah Buehler, PhD NIDCAP Master Trainer APIB Trainer Associate Director, West Coast NIDCAP and APIB Training Center email: deborahbuehler@comcast.net Vice President James M. Helm, PhD NIDCAP Senior Trainer Director, Carolina NIDCAP Training Center email: jhelm@wakemed.org Treasurer Gloria McAnulty, PhD National NIDCAP Training Center email: gloria.mcanulty@childrens.harvard.edu Secretary Dorothy Vittner, RN, PhD Senior NIDCAP Trainer email: dorothy.vittner@uconn.edu Heidelise Als, PhD NIDCAP Founder, Past President 2001-2012 Senior NIDCAP Master Trainer APIB Master Trainer Director, National NIDCAP Training Center email: heidelise.als@childrens.harvard.edu Nikk Conneman, MD Senior NIDCAP Trainer Director, Sophia NIDCAP Training Center email: n.conneman@erasmusmc.nl Mandy Daly, Dip. H Diet and Nutrition, ACII, DLDU Family Representative, Dublin, Ireland email: mandy.daly@yahoo.co.uk gretchen Lawhon, PhD, RN, CBC, FAAN Past President 2012-2016 NIDCAP Master Trainer email: premieg@gmail.com Juzer Tyebkhan, MD NIDCAP Trainer Director, Edmonton NIDCAP Training Centre email: juzer.tyebkhan@albertahealthservices.ca Björn Westrup, MD, PhD Director, Karolinska NIDCAP Training & Research Center email: bjorn.westrup@karolinska.se Rodd E. Hedlund, MEd Director NIDCAP Nursery Assessment and Certification Program NIDCAP Trainer email: nnacpdirector@nidcap.org Sandra Kosta, BA Executive Director of Administration and Finance email: sandra.kosta@childrens.harvard.edu http://nidcap.org/en/nfi-news/developmental-observer-the-official-newsletter-of-the-nfi/ Developmental Observer • 2018 • 25 NIDCAP on the Web To learn more about the NFI and its programs please visit us at www.nidcap.org Please visit the NFI’s YouTube Channel to watch videos about NIDCAP (in 13 languages) and the NNACP. www.youtube.com/user/NIDCAPFI The NFI NIDCAP Blog offers observations from many different perspectives on NIDCAP and its implementation, such as NIDCAP and APIB training, Nursery Certification, the science behind the approach, the family experience with NIDCAP, the NFI, and much more. We encourage you to visit the NIDCAP Blog and to leave comments for our bloggers and our NIDCAP community in general. If interested in becoming a guest blogger please contact Sandra Kosta at sandra.kosta@nidcap.org. Follow us on all of our social media platforms: Like Us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow our posts on Pinterest Connect with colleagues on LinkedIn Watch our videos on You Tube Read and participate on our NIDCAP Blog http://nidcap.org/blog/ https://www.facebook.com/nidcap https://twitter.com/NIDCAP https://www.pinterest.com/nidcap/ https://www.linkedin.com/company/nidcap-federation-international https://www.linkedin.com/company/nidcap-federation-international https://www.youtube.com/user/NIDCAPFI http://nidcap.org/blog/ http://nidcap.org/blog/ https://www.facebook.com/nidcap https://www.youtube.com/user/NIDCAPFI https://twitter.com/NIDCAP http://nidcap.org/blog/ https://www.pinterest.com/nidcap/ https://www.linkedin.com/company/nidcap-federation-international www.nidcap.org N I D C A P T R A I N I N G C E N T E R S by order of establishment Become a Member of the NFI The NFI has expanded opportunities for membership. Please join us! For more information and the online application form, visit our website at: www.nidcap.org or email us at nfimembership@nidcap.org National NIDCAP Training Center Boston Children’s Hospital and Brigham and Women’s Hospital Boston, Massachusetts, USA Director: Heidelise Als, PhD Contact: Sandra M. Kosta, BA email: nidcap@childrens.harvard.edu Sooner NIDCAP Training Center (inactive) University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA Director: Andrea Willeitner, MD West Coast NIDCAP and APIB Training Center University of California San Francisco San Francisco, California, USA Director and Contact: Kathleen VandenBerg, PhD Associate Director: Deborah Buehler, PhD email: vandenbergka@yahoo.com Carolina NIDCAP Training Center WakeMed, Division of Neonatology Raleigh, North Carolina, USA Director and Contact: James M. Helm, PhD email: jhelm@wakemed.org Karolinska NIDCAP Training and Research Center Astrid Lindgren Children’s Hospital at Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm, Sweden Director: Stina Klemming, MD Co-Director: Björn Westrup, MD, PhD Contact: Ann-Sofie Ingman, RN, BSN email: nidcap@karolinska.se French NIDCAP Center Medical School, Université de Bretagne Occidentale and University Hospital Brest, France Director: Jacques Sizun, MD Co-Director and Contact: Nathalie Ratynski, MD email: nathalie.ratynski@chu-brest.fr Sophia NIDCAP Training Center Erasmus MC-Sophia Children’s Hospital Rotterdam, The Netherlands Director: Nikk Conneman, MD Co-Director and Contact: Monique Oude Reimer, RN email: nidcap@erasmusmc.nl Centro Latinoamericano NIDCAP & APIB Fernández Hospital Fundación Dr. Miguel Margulies and Fundación Alumbrar Buenos Aires, Argentina Director and Contact: Graciela Basso, MD, PhD email: basso.grace@gmail.com UK NIDCAP Centre Department of Neonatology, University College Hospital, London, UK Director: Neil Marlow, DM FMedSci Contact: Gillian Kennedy, MSc, OBE email: gillian.kennedy@uclh.nhs.uk Children’s Hospital of University of Illinois (CHUI) NIDCAP Training Center University of Illinois Medical Center at Chicago Chicago, Illinois, USA Director: Beena Peters, RN, MS Contact: Jean Powlesland, RN, MS email: jpowlesl@uic.edu NIDCAP Cincinnati Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center Cincinnati, Ohio, USA Director: Michelle Shinkle, MSN, RN Contact: Linda Lacina, MSN email: nidcap@cchmc.org The Brussels NIDCAP Training Center Saint-Pierre University Hospital Free University of Brussels Brussels, Belgium Director: Inge Van Herreweghe, MD Co-Director: Dominique Haumont, MD Contact: Delphine Druart, RN email: delphine_druart@stpierre-bru.be NIDCAP Norway, Ålesund Training Center Ålesund Hospital, Ålesund, Norway Director: Lutz Nietsch, MD Contact: Liv Ellen Helseth, RN email: nidcap@helse-mr.no The Barcelona-Vall d’Hebron NIDCAP Training Center Spain Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron Barcelona, Spain Director and Contact: Josep Perapoch, MD, PhD email: jperapoc@vhebron.net Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre NIDCAP Training Center Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre Madrid, Spain Director: Carmen Martinez de Pancorbo, MD Contact: María López Maestro, MD email: nidcap.hdoc@salud.madrid.org St. Joseph’s Hospital NIDCAP Training Center St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center Phoenix, Arizona, USA Co-Directors: Bonni Moyer, MSPT and Marla Wood, RN, BSN, MEd Contact: Windy Crow email: windy.crow@dignityhealth.org Italian Modena NIDCAP Training Center Modena University Hospital, Modena, Italy Director: Fabrizio Ferrari, MD Contact: Natascia Bertoncelli, PT email: natafili@yahoo.com Danish NIDCAP Training and Research Center Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus N, Denmark Director and Contact: Hanne Aagaard, RN, MScN, PhD Co-Director: Eva Jörgensen, RN Newborn and email: hanne.aagaard@skejby.rm.dk São João NIDCAP Training Center Pediatric Hospital at São João Hospital Porto, Portugal Director: Hercília Guimarães, MD, PhD Co-Director and Contact: Fátima Clemente email: saojoaonidcap@chsj.min-saude.pt NIDCAP Germany, Training Center Tübingen Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany Universitätsklinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin Director: Christian Poets, MD PhD Contact: Natalie Broghammer, RN email: natalie.broghammer@med.uni-tuebingen.de French NIDCAP Center, Toulouse Hôpital des Enfant Toulouse, France Director: Charlotte Casper, MD, PhD Co-Director and Contact: Sandra Lescure, MD email: lescure.s@chu-toulouse.fr Australasian NIDCAP Training Centre Westmead, Australia Co-Directors: Alison Loughran-Fowlds MBBS, DCH, FRACP, PhD and Kaye Spence AM, RN, MN Contact: Nadine Griffiths email: SCHN-NIDCAPAustralia@health.nsw.gov.au Edmonton NIDCAP Training Centre Stollery Children’s Hospital Royal Alexandra Site Edmonton, AB, Canada Co-Directors: Andrea Nykipilo, RN and Juzer Tyebkhan, MB Contact: Trina Cruz email: NIDCAPEdmonton@ahs.ca http://nidcap.org/en/about-us/membership-overview/