id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentence	flesch	summary	cache	txt
absel-509	Hansen, Katharine; Hansen, Randall S.	Employment Interview Preparation: Assessing the Writing-To-Learn Approach	2014	9	.pdf	application/pdf	7524	355	44	145 Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, Volume 33, 2006 Table 1 Interview Results Comparing Writing-to-Learn Participants with Participants with No Written Preparation Interview evaluations used a scale of 1-5 (1=lowest; 5=highest) Evaluation Criterion Mean Interview Preparation (N = 38) Mean No Preparation (N =29) Confidence 4.14 3.67 Evidence of Preparedness for Interview 3.91 3.60 Relevance of Response Content (address question asked) 3.89 3.74 Thoroughness of Response Content (detailed, yet concise) 3.91 3.57 Delivery of Responses (natural, not over-rehearsed) 4.01 3.59 Chi Square Analy Evaluation Criterion Confidence Evidence of Preparedness for Interview Relevance of Response Content (address question Thoroughness of Response Content (detailed, yet Delivery of Responses (natural, not over-rehearsed Students in interview prep group, n=38; s CONCLUSIONS Based on the possible trend indication of the study, well as the extant literature dealing with intervi preparation and writing-to-learn, we still conjecture relationship between written interview preparation a interview success. Research by Perry and Goldberg (1998) suggests that interview preparation is important because when recruiters were asked about college students they interviewed, interviewing skills surpassed the students’ background or experience in recruiter assessments of the likelihood that their companies would consider hiring a given student.	cache/absel-509.pdf	txt/absel-509.txt