age of Professor Royce. This reminds one of St. Thomas's fam- ous argument for the existence of God. “It has been asked,” says St. Thomas, “if there is a God, whence comes Evil? We should rather conclude thus: If there is Evil there is a God, for Evil would have no existence with- out order in the Good, the privation of which is Evil. But there would not be this order if God did not exist.” Professor Royce holds that Job's problem is insoluble upon Job's presup- position, which is that God is an external creator and ruler, for in this case God is either cruel or helpless. Only when one regards God as the essence and fulness of all Being, abso- lutely one with humanity, suffering in its pain and triumphing in its victory, can there be any satisfactory solution of the problem. God is not the Infinite One beyond the finite imper- fections, but the being whose unity determines the very constitution, the tension and relative disharmony of the finite world, and so the ex- istence of Evil is not only consistent with the perfection of the universe, but is necessary for the very existence of that perfection. To the student of Hegel, this theory of the justification of Evil is not new ; nor does Pro- fessor Royce offer it as such. The merit of the essay is that the most difficult of problems is handled in a clear and masterly way, and the solution given is in accordance with the views of some of the ablest thinkers of the present time. Professor Royce again states his fundamental theory in an essay on “Tennyson and Pessim- ism.” He defends the position that “Locksley Hall Sixty Years After,” although artistically inferior to the first “Locksley Hall,” is ethi- cally higher, and, contrary to general opinion, far more satisfactory. The complaint is made by the author that while Tennyson is one of the most devout of men, he gives as his ideal some- thing that can be realized only through a more or less complete separation from the world of con- crete life. The God in whom Tennyson believes is a God that hides himself, or shows himself only on rare or romantic occasions to the devout. In no sense is he the God of the present. He is the God of the future. This is shown in the first “Locksley Hall.” The young man is in the old romantic world on a quest for the ideal. He has nothing to do with the commonplace. His business is important, but vague and inde- scribable. Its prominent feature is that it takes him away from earthly relations to move forward, and neither he nor anyone else knows exactly where. This romantic idealism Pro- fessor Royce claims leads eventually to pessim- ism; and the pessimism of the second “Locks- ley Hall,” so far as it is pessimistic, is the explicit statement of what is implied in the first. The thought is, Unless God is here, how do you know he is elsewhere? Unless the present has divine meaning, What proof is there of a far-off divine event? It is the recognition of this thought, and the absence of a vain roman- ticism, that gives a value to the later poem. For here Tennyson recognizes that if this is God's world, then these struggles, sins, striv- ings, and loves must be the expression of God's will: a truth which Browning repeats over and over again. Like various other forms of Evil, pessimism is not to be regarded as a final ill. On the contrary, “the best man is the one who can see the truth of pessimism, can absorb and transcend that truth, and can be nevertheless an optimist, not by virtue of his failure to recognize the evil of life, but by virtue of his readiness to take part in the struggle against this evil.” One of the most interesting, as well as most original, of these essays is “The Case of John Bunyan.” The religious experiences of the great writer, as given in his remarkable Con- fessions, “Grace Abounding to the Chief of Sinners,” are summarized by Professor Royce, and then interpreted, not in terms of the soul and its relation to God, but in the language of the latest school of empirical psychology. The story of Bunyan's religious life offers a rare object-lesson to the student of normal and ab- normal mental processes. Bunyan was what psychologists would call a good visualizer. He was also an expert in the dialectics of the inner life, and a born genius as to the whole range of language functions, good and bad. Describing his early youth, he tells us that he frequently felt himself tempted to curse and swear, or speak some grievous thing against God. These and other insistent morbid impulses—such as wavering hopes, gloomy doubts and question- 1899.] THE TXIAL 123 º ings, all of which Bunyan subsumes under the name Tempter — are more or less inhibited by other automatic mental processes, the result of a close study of the scriptures; for a text con- demning or encouraging was sure to come to his mind whenever the oath came to his lips or the doubt to his consciousness. A chaos of motor processes was the result. Noting these and similar trains of morbid association, Pro- fessor Royce follows them through their various stages, as reported in the wonderfully clear and definite autobiography, marking the corre- spondence between periods of low physical con- dition and certain religious depressions. Finally the great change came, when, under a skilful self-imposed mental regimen, Bunyan had no return of the more deeply systemized disorders, although always a prey to elementary insistent temptations and depressions. The study of Bunyan's Case is of value as typical of morbid processes which have gone on in many brains less exalted than that of Bunyan without Bun- yan's power of vivid description. While Pro- fessor Royce has chosen to state the case in psychological terms, he is careful to say that this does not in any wise impair its worth as an ethical study; for the problem to Bunyan was one of moral struggle, a struggle in which he came out victorious, recognizing in his victory the value of the Tempter as well as the Com- forter. The remaining essays in the volume bear upon other aspects of the relation of Good and Evil, and serve to illustrate the author's funda- mental theory that Evil is essential to the real- ization of Good; that it is the living strife in the midst of which and by which God main- tains Himself in the world. CAROLINE K. SHERMAN. THE annual volume for 1898 of the “Proceedings and Addresses” of the National Educational Association has just been published under the editorship of Mr. Irwin Shepard, secretary of the Association, and preserves for the members all of the papers and discussions of the meeting held last July in the national capital. It is a thick octavo of more than eleven hundred pages, and the contents relate to almost every conceivable phase of the educational problem. An elaborate index makes these contents readily available for reference. We should add that a considerable section of the volume is devoted to the Chattanooga meeting, held in February, of the Department of Superintendence. The papers here printed are, of course, greatly varied in their value, and we cannot help wishing that the general effect were not quite so scrappy — that the longer papers might be longer, and many of the shorter ones suppressed alto- gether. RECENT FICTION.” “Ashes of Empire” is the third in order of pub- lication of the series of romances in which Mr. Robert W. Chambers has sought to write a pictur- esque history of the Année Terrible. Its predeces- ..sors are “The Red Republic” and “Lorraine.” It will be followed by a fourth, dealing with the oper- ations of the Army of the Loire. We are compelled to say that “Ashes of Empire” is distinctly the poorest, as “Lorraine” is distinctly the best, of the three books thus far published. The author's inven- tion seems to be flagging, and his sentimentalism to have become exaggerated. Still, the gift of romantic story-telling is his in so marked a degree that one may derive a good deal of pleasure from the new book, which begins with the news of Sedan and the escape of the Empress, tells the pitiful story of the siege, and ends with the entry of the victorious Prussians into the capital. Meanwhile, we are made to realize by ominous mutterings the gather- ing of the storm soon thereafter to break in the Commune, of which Mr. Chambers has already written in “The Red Republic.” Upon a previous occasion, in speaking of these books, we have had to regret the author's propensity to disfigure them by the introduction of caricatures of some of the best of Frenchmen. But the prejudices hitherto made manifest in the treatment of Thiers and Gambetta and Hugo seem feeble in comparison with that now excited by Renan, who is caricatured in the present volume so offensively that one feels nothing but disgust for a novelist who could so per- *AsHEs of EMPIRE. A Romance. By Robert W. Cham- bers. New York: Frederick A. Stokes Co. THE RoAD To PARIs. A Story of Adventure. By Robert Neilson Stephens. Boston: L. C. Page & Co. THE Count's SNUFF-Box. By George R. R. Rivers. Boston: Little, Brown, & Co. A HERALD of THE WEST. By Joseph A. Altsheler. New York: D. Appleton & Co. MANDERs. By Elwyn Barron. London: John Macqueen. THE Associate HERMITs. By Frank R. Stockton. New York: Harper & Brothers. ExILED For Liese MAJESTÉ. By James T. Whittaker. Cincinnati: Curts & Jennings. WITH Bought Swords. A Tale of a Spanish-American Republic. New York: M. F. Mansfield & Co. THE BATTLE of THE STRoNg. A Romance of Two King- doms. By Gilbert Parker. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin & Co. HER MEMORY. By Maarten Maartens. New York: D. Appleton & Co. THE CHANGELING. A Novel. By Sir Walter Besant. New York: Frederick A. Stokes Co. THE ADVENTURERs. A Tale of Treasure Trove. By H. B. Marriott Watson. New York: Harper & Brothers. THE RED AxE. By S. R. Crockett. New York: Harper & Brothers. GRACE O'MALLEY, PRINCEss AND PIRATE. By Robert Machray. New York: Frederick A. Stokes Co. AdventurEs of THE ComTE DE LA MUETTE DURING THE REIGN of TERROR. By Bernard Capes. New York: Dodd, Mead & Co. THE ScourtGE of God. A Romance of Religious Persecu- tion. By John Bloundelle-Burton. New York: D. Appleton & Co. 124 [Feb. 16, THE DIAL vert the truth. This blot so darkens “The Ashes of Empire” that its real merits are likely to be overlooked. “The Road to Paris” is a long one, if we take the new romance by Mr. R. N. Stephens for a guide and cicerone. The story begins at Culloden with the flight into exile of the hero's father. The hero. himself is born in the wilds of Pennsylvania, in time to grow up into a Revolutionary soldier, and take part in the fray on Bunker's Hill. He then, after escaping from imprisonment, joins the expedition to Quebec, and makes the long march through Maine to the St. Lawrence. In Quebec he appears as a spy, escapes detention, and gets carried away to England as a prisoner of war under the supposition that he is somebody else. Ethan Allen is one of his fellow-prisoners upon this unwilling voyage. Escaping from his English prison, he becomes in turn a strolling juggler, a gardener's assistant, and a fine gentleman of the town in Bath and London. Newgate, Vauxhall, and Hyde Park all make his acquaintance, and, after a surprising series of intrigues and adventures, he finds his way across the Channel in a smuggling boat, and seems at last to be really upon the road to Paris, the goal of his boyhood's ambition. But before he enters the city, he becomes engrossed in a sentimental episode with the precocious young daughter of Necker (who was afterwards to become the author of “Corinne”), and is also unwillingly mixed up in an organized plot for the assassination of that famous Minister. In consequence of all this, our hero's first entrance into Paris makes him a guest of the Bastille, where he languishes in captivity for a year or so. Escap- ing again (he always escapes), he makes his adven- turous way into Germany, and becomes a personage at the court of Hesse-Cassel. Here he takes part in a conspiracy against the Landgraf, barely escapes with his life, and carries off his lady-love in triumph to Paris, which he really enters at last in the fashion to be desired. The lady in the case, it should be added, has figured in his life both in New England and in Quebec, so we know she is bound to appear at the end and make his story all that a romance should be. Here, indeed, is a tangled skein of ad- venturous experiences, and the reader hardly knows, when all is over, whether to admire the more the author's easy and animated narrative manner, or the astonishing ingenuity displayed by him in mak- ing so many historical scenes and situations take part in the shaping of the hero's destiny. Mr. Elwyn Barron, who some years ago left America for an English sojourn of indefinite dura- tion, is now favorably recalled to the memory of his old circle of readers by what may fairly be called one of the most charming novels of the sea- son. “Manders” is a Europeanized production, — almost as much so as the later stories of Mr. Henry Harland, which it somehow suggests, and it strik- ingly illustrates, when compared with Mr. Barron's earlier writing, the broadening influences of life in the great centres of European civilization. Manders is the name of a little boy, and he is ostensibly the hero of the story, but in fact he interests us less than his widowed mother — a professional model in the Quarter—and her vacillating but not unsym- pathetic lover, an American art student of ample means. Mr. Barron's success with his heroine is akin to Du Maurier's success with a certain girl whom we need not name: it is the successful por- trayal of a woman who remains pure at heart amid surroundings that at least are not encouraging to purity. There is also an American heroine of pro- nounced and attractive type, besides the necessary complement of minor characters. The author has shown much skill in realizing these figures for us, besides doing it in a style that is excellent on its own account. He has a form of expression that is crisp and effective, subtly humorous upon occasion, but always ready to rise to the demands of a seri- ous situation. The book is not exactly a strong one, but it is exceptionally pleasing, and it rings true. As every reader of Mr. Stockton's books is aware, the stories that they tell cannot possibly be retold in abstract. “The Associate Hermits” is no exception to this rule, and an outline of its plot would give no notion whatever of the quaint humor, the nov- elty of situation, and the general whimsicality, which make this book a worthy companion of its many predecessors. About the only idea that can be de- tached without losing its essential flavor is the one with which the story opens—the idea of a newly- wedded couple who, instead of starting on a wed- ding journey themselves, persuade the parents of the bride to do it for them. This is as Stocktonian a notion as can be; to tell what follows shall be his affair, not ours. Two historical romances which stand rather above the usual level of merit have for their subject the War of 1812. Mr. George Rivers, the author of “The Count's Snuff-Box,” has taken the episode of the Henry letters for a starting-point, and the “Count” of the title-page is the imposter who posed as one Edward de Crillon upon that critical occa- sion. Mr. Rivers supplements what is known his- torically of that imposter by embellishments of the usual romantic sort, and makes an agreeable story of the whole affair. The scene is laid partly on the shore of Buzzard's Bay and partly in Washington, the burning of the capital by a horde of British ruf- fians affording a thrilling climax to the work. The burning of Washington also appears in “A Herald of the West,” by Mr. Joseph Altsheler, but midway in this case, for the Battle of New Orleans provides the climax. Mr. Altsheler's book is more closely historical than the one before mentioned, and those who have read his two earlier romances of American history do not need to be told that he is a writer of real power. In these days, which are witnessing a recementation of the ties that should and must bind together the English-speaking peo- ples, we are apt to forget how real were the griev- ances that brought on the War of 1812. These the author recalls to us in plain terms, with perhaps just 1899.] THE DIAL 125 a touch of the bitterness that should by this time have disappeared altogether, but certainly with no harboring of the old rancor. The story is well-knit, varied of interest, thrilling upon occasion, and dis- tinctly to be praised. “Exiled for Lèse Majesté” is a taking title for a book, and when a glance at the pages shows it to be a story of Russian despotism and imprisonment in Siberia, a certain pleasurable anticipation is aroused. But the expectation is doomed to disap- pointment upon further examination, for the story proves but a tenuous thread upon which the author hangs a heavy burden of miscellaneous information concerning all subjects under the sun (and others). Interminable conversations of a semi-didactic sort are the substance of the book, while the romantic interest is lost like a rivulet in the desert. We can- not help being amused at the audacity of the writer in making his characters discuss (in the time of Nicholas — that is, in the early fifties) such subjects as Darwinism and the marvellous growth of Chicago, and quote from FitzGerald's Omar and the later poems of Longfellow. No such trifling matter as an anachronism is going to stand in the way of this writer's fancy; if he wishes to point a moral, he is evidently not to be deterred by any consideration of what the mere facts will justify. “With Bought Swords” is a Spanish-American romance of revolution and intrigue, in which the author has by no means made the most of his mate- rials. The effect is too sketchy to be in any way impressive. Over and over again, situations that might have been worked up excitingly are merely hinted at, and one follows the story with some dif- ficulty. We fear that this book must be character- ized as a bit of amateurish effort undeserving of serious attention. Those who expected the new novel by “Maarten Maartens” to be a work of such elaborate interest as “My Lady Nobody” or “God's Fool” will be disappointed. It is so long since the author last came before the public that such an expectation was reasonable, but instead of fulfilling it, he now pre- sents us with what is little more than a sketch. The book is called “Her Memory,” and is the study of a man's sorrow when bereft of a beloved wife, and left to face an existence made solitary save by the presence of the little girl who is left him. How the passionate soul of the man rebels, and how the first poignancy of grief gradually becomes tempered into endurance, how the lives of both father and child develope under the influence of the tender memory that remains to them, and how existence in the end comes once more to take on its wonted aspect; all these things are imparted to our sympathies rather than to our intellect by the writer's graceful art. Few novelists have so marked a temperament as this Anglicized Dutchman of genius, and the tempera- ment is such as to suggest Thackeray in more than one way, although there is back of it no such wealth of intellectual resource as was possessed by the author of “Vanity Fair” and “Henry Esmond.” “Her Memory” is a welcome visitor to our table, but we cannot help wishing that it were ampler in dimen- sions and richer in content. “In any case this tale has no claim to be called a historical novel,” says Mr. Gilbert Parker in a note appended to “The Battle of the Strong.” We shall take the liberty of qualifying this assertion to a certain extent. Admitting the fact that the char- acters concerned are wholly the creations of the author, it must yet be said that a novel may be historical even if no actor on the stage of actual history treads its boards. The setting must be taken into account, the manners and customs depicted, the truthfulness to the larger historical facts of the period and the place concerned. In these particu- lars, the book is a historical novel in a high and fine sense, just as Victor Hugo’s “Les Misérables” is a historical novel, and would remain one without its description of the battle of Waterloo. There are more reasons than one for the suggestion, in the present connection, of the great French masterpiece. It is made inevitable by the fact that Mr. Parker's book is a romance of Jersey, for no one may write of the Channel Islands without suggesting the writer who lived among them during nearly twenty years' voluntary exile. There are, furthermore, among Mr. Parker's pages not a few which in manner, in epic breadth of treatment, and in poetic envisage- ment of an impressive scene or situation, constantly recall to the mind this or that page of “Quatre-Vingt- Treize" and “Les Travailleurs de la Mer.” Nor is the comparison an unworthy one, for Mr. Parker here approves himself to be of the great race of story- tellers, and has produced a work that must be reck- oned among the masterpieces of recent fiction. The scene is Jersey, for the most part, although an im- portant section of the romance takes us to the Duchy of Bercy, and the time that of the Revolution. The island itself remains almost undisturbed during these stormy years, but echoes from Paris, and La Vendée, and the high seas where English and French are pitted against each other, reach the scene from time to time, and bring the action into relief against an impressive historical background. Still, its inter- est, which runs the entire gamut from the lightest comedy to the deepest tragedy, is essentially domes- tic, and concerns the lives of a few Jerseymen and Jerseywomen. Among these the heroine, Guida de Landresse, shines like a star in the purity of her womanhood, and about her are grouped three men who love her—one less than his ambition, another with a too dumb and dog-like devotion, a third, to whose life her gracious presence gives renewed no- bility of purpose, and who wins her in the end, after she has sounded all the depths of grief, and felt to the full the chastening influence of suffering. The story is one in which strength and sweetness are so subtly commingled that each intensifies the other. Mr. Parker has made judicious use of a vast amount of material collected for his work. The history, the customs, the dialect, the folk-lore, and the insti- tutions of the island are drawn upon most effectively. 126 [Feb. 16, THE DIAL and when the climax is reached, it is an ancient legal formula that provides the keynote to an intensely dramatic situation. When the wronged Guida appeals for justice to the Cour d'Héritage, it is with the old Norman cry: Haro, haro / a l'aide, mon Prince, on me fait tort / The effect, as con- trived by Mr. Parker, is simply overwhelmning. We might go on almost indefinitely in praising this book—which is an advance upon even “The Seats of the Mighty”—but enough has been said to make it clear that here is a work to be reckoned with, and to persuade our readers of the pleasure that is in store for them. Sir Walter Besant has written so many novels that some of them must be poorer than the others, and there is no doubt that “The Changeling ” is one of the least successful of them all. It is more discursive than usual, more obviously artificial, and has more resort to situations and coincidences of the kind that strain the credulity. It tells of a mother who, losing her infant child, seeks to spare its father the grief of the loss by putting another child in the vacant place. How this sin finds her out after many years, and how the history of the substituted child proves heredity to be stronger than environment, are the two main themes of this story, which is rather bewildering in its complications, and unim- pressive in its outcome. A few months ago, we noticed an extraordinary romance entitled “The Lake of Wine,” by Mr. Bernard Capes. It will possibly be remembered that this title was derived from the fanciful name of a great ruby, for the discovery and possession of which many men ventured (and some of them lost) their lives. In reading “The Adventurers,” by Mr. Marriott Watson, we find the same story, in its gen- eral outline, retold. The treasure in this case is gold and not jewels, but otherwise the similarity is strik- ing. There is an ancient country house in England, and the treasure which it conceals is eagerly con- tended for by the owner of the house and the des- perate gang of cutthroats who have learned of its existence. In both cases, also, the hiding-place of the treasure is as unknown to the one party as to the other. The chief difference is in the style of the two narratives, for that of “The Adventurers ” is as plain and straightforward as that of “The Lake of Wine’’ is affected and tortuous. It is a rather daring thing, for either writer, thus to have framed in the setting of the nineteenth century conditions in a civilized country an action so full of lawlessness and bloody violence that it belongs rather to Turkey or to the sixteenth century. The story is certainly interesting, and its plot is mostingeniously contrived. In “The Red Axe,” Mr. Crockett departs from his wonted scenes and his well-worn Scots, to write of the robber barons of mediaeval Germany. For once, he has for us no moss-hags and no stern Cov- enanters, but instead, Gothic towers and ruthless bands of the rough riders of several centuries ago. The book is very “bluggy.” The hero is the son of the hereditary justiciar to the Dukes of the Wolf- mark, and is himself called upon, in the due course of events, to take up the axe of the executioner. Thrills occur upon nearly every page of this story, which is so swift in its action that one gasps for breath in trying to keep up with it. There is a love- story, too, as tender as any that the author has imagined, and, altogether, the book affords much exciting entertainment. “Grace O'Malley, Princess and Pirate” is surely a fetching title, and the covers of the book add pic- torial effect to verbal by a poster-portrait of the heroine. The story turns out to be a wild history of love and revenge in Elizabethan Ireland, with the historical figure of the Earl of Desmond set among those drawn by the writer from his imagina- tion. The story is related in the first person, and with the usual affectation of an archaic form of speech. But, despite the author's endeavor, his book is a rather dull one, and he misses the romantic touch of which such men as Mr. Bloundelle-Burton, for instance, know the secret so well. The “Adventures of the Comte de la Muette dur- ing the Reign of Terror” is an interesting romance of a rather conventional sort, which tells how an aristocrat, by means of disguise, escaped massacre, and how he also saved the life of a fair aristocratic damsel, who naturally became his wife when their adventures were over. It is a picturesque and thrilling narrative, with the proper infusion of sen- timent, studied from the memoirs of the period, and told with considerable dramatic effect. Mr. Bloundelle-Burton is rapidly taking the place, if he has not already taken it, that clearly belongs to him among writers of historical romance. Few, if any, of his living fellow-workers in this field have a finer sense of the requirements of this form of fiction, or a better equipment for its production. In “The Scourge of God,” he has taken for his theme the Huguenot persecutions that followed the Revo- cation. The scene is laid among the Cévennes, and the desolation wrought in that fair region by the Most Christian King's endeavor to stamp out a pestilent heresy is pictured with vivid and terrible effect. The monarch who was so justly called the “Scourge of God” does not appear personally in these pages, and the “femme funeste et terrible” at whose behest he acted appears only in two brief scenes; but, in a certain sense, these two personages dominate the history, and their figures ever loom up in the background of the imagination. The story is one of the best in style, construction, information, and graphic power, that have been written in recent years. WILLIAM MoRTON PAYNE. A “History of the World from the Earliest Histor- ical Time to the Year 1898,” is the title of a volume prepared by Mr. Edgar Sanderson for “The Concise Knowledge Library” (Appleton). One rather gasps at the thought of such a book, but series have to exist, and volumes must be made to fit them. Mr. Sanderson is a careful historical scholar, and his book commands approval. 1899.] THE DIAL 127 BRIEFS ON NEW BOOKS. New England There are some things that would letters and lead one to keep separate in the ***** mind Mr. W. C. Lawton's “New England Poets” (Macmillan) and Mrs. Harriet H. Robinson’s “Loom and Spindle” (Crowell). The latter book will be of value to the economist and the historian: Mr. Carroll D. Wright, who contri- butes an Introduction, adds his authority on this point. The former, as will be inferred by the read- ers of Mr. Lawton's recent book on Homer, will be useful mainly to the literary student. But the two books came to us at the same time, and they con- nect themselves in our mind. Mr. Lawton's book is a good statement of the position and the work of Emerson, Hawthorne, Longfellow, Whittier, Lowell, and Holmes. Mrs. Robinson's is a very interest- ing account of the life and characteristics of the Lowell mill-girls half a century ago. Mr. Lawton, as one may see from his title, emphasizes the idea that these poets were New England poets: that their lives and work was conditioned by their being born and living in New England. Now, New En- gland in the middle of this century was certainly not all factory-life in Lowell,—and yet the change is not very severe from Lucy Larcom's “New England Girlhood " to Dr. Edward Everett Hale's “New England Boyhood.” It is not that Emerson and Holmes, for instance, were of the stock of which mill-hands were made. But the old families from which they sprang never held themselves very far above the old families from which the mill-girls came, and in very many forms of thought and modes of feeling they never separated themselves at all. Everywhere the same church, the same school, the same town-meeting served for both, and much the same careers were open to both. The Brahmin caste was really not a caste, properly speaking, at all, for it never shunned communion with others. Of course these poets were of the picked New En- gland stock, picked over in some cases for genera- tions. That is true; but who picked them, and for whom were they picked? Who was it that was to understand them,--who did understand them, if it comes to that? Not more the mill-girls of Lowell than the students of Harvard, doubtless; but who were they? The old Lowell factory-life is especially interesting because particular circumstances gave the opportunity for presenting in great purity the type of New England, the worker, the worshipper, the lover of the things of the mind. This is seen in Mrs. Robinson's book, which is of these two the more interesting, for it deals with matters which are to the most of us half familiar; it opens a door into the past, as Lowell says, into a room that we have heard of but never entered; it tells us of a life eminently characteristic and now wholly passed away. But its interest, to us at least, is greatly heightened by the fact that it enables us to read the other book so much more understandingly. We rather wish that Mr. Lawton had been able to read it before writing his own book. It makes one under- stand, better than before, all the six that he writes of except Hawthorne, and perhaps even Hawthorne. They are rightly called “New England ” poets. But what is, or rather was, New England? That is something which we need not try to say just here. There are a hundred books to answer those that cannot remember, but the list will not be complete until it includes Mrs. Robinson's simple record of a phase long gone forever. France to-day, convulsed by the Dreyfus matter, presents a curious, a humiliating, yet a not altogether hopeless spectacle of national retrogression: curious to the social pathologist, humiliating to the opti- mistic champion of free institutions, not altogether, or indeed by any means, hopeless to those who understand the transient and superficial character of these periodic outbreaks of French, or per- haps more accurately speaking, Parisian hysteria. Broadly speaking, the Dreyfus case and the popular hallucinations attending it are the result of the momentary ascendency of forces which the Revolu- tion overthrew but unhappily could not extirpate. There were diseased parts in the national body which the rude and sometimes misapplied surgery of the soi-disant regenerators of France failed to cut away, and which could not have been quite cut away by far more skilful operators. Now a portion of the poisonous virus has worked its way to the surface; and the civilized world looks on in amaze- ment at the spectacle of Jesuitry, bigotry, caste- tyranny, working their infamous will on an innocent man, quite as in the days of Calas and La Barre; while a populace that a decade ago celebrated the centenary of the fall of the Bastille stands by ap- plauding and supporting the outrage. Unhappily, there is now no Voltaire to smite the evil. But the mind of France is saner and her conscience more sensitive than in the days when the “intellectuals” of Voltaire's century fought the battle against the foes of right and reason that M. Zola and his col- leagues are fighting to-day; and there is good ground of hope that Frenchmen are even now shaking off the degrading hallucination that condemns the un- happy Dreyfus and the heroic Picquart to shame and torture, while the reptilian Esterhazy and the monstrous Drumont go unwhipt of justice. If there be to-day any rational being, outside of France, who is still unconvinced of the fact that Esterhazy is the man who ought to be where Dreyfus is, that he is the writer of the bordereau and the seller to the German attaché of the military secrets therein listed, we earnestly commend to him Mr. F. C. Conybeare's concise and conclusive little book entitled “The Dreyfus Case” (Dodd). Through the presentation of documents, facsimiles of handwriting, etc., and through its well-marshalled history of the successive stages and phases of the case, it puts beyond the shadow of a doubt the facts of the innocence of Dreyfus and the guilt of Esterhazy. The volume France as elucidated by the Dreyfus case. 128 [Feb. 16, THE DIAT, is well furnished with portraits of the chief actors in this remarkable cause célebrè, beginning with the noble Picquart (one of the brightest names in the annals of contemporary France), and ending with Esterhazy, whose vice-seared face is a safe passport to the material hell of his antiquated faith. Admirable productions of their kind are the “University Addresses” de- livered before the students of the University of Glasgow by the late Principal John Caird, and now reprinted by the Macmillan Co. in a neat volume of 380 odd pages, under the editorial supervision of Professor Edward Caird of Balliol College, Oxford. The addresses here collected are of two kinds: those customarily delivered by Prin- cipal Caird at the beginning of each session, on some subject connected with the studies of the Uni- versity, or on the life and work of some great author with whose name one or other of these studies is representatively connected; and those addresses on some general topic of University Education which Principal Caird was in the habit of delivering to the graduates at the end of the session, after the graduation ceremonies. Of the former and more important class of addresses, the volume contains twelve. Of the graduation addresses, only two are given: “The Personal Element in Teaching,” and “General and Professional Education.” Principal Caird, in one notable passage, pays a tribute to the universities of Scotland that may be quoted here as suggesting a useful ideal not, we think, kept so fully in view as it should be in the great educational foundations of our own country: “It is the glory of our Scottish universities that they have never been made places of education for a class, that no costly arrangements render access to them possible only for the rich, and that when once he has crossed their doors a young man finds himself in a community where intellectual resource is the only wealth that wins re- spect, brain power the only power that tells, and where honor and distinction await the ablest and worthiest, and await these alone.” This special tribute which Principal Caird felt in conscience justified in paying to the universities of his own country applies, we think, with equal justice to those of Germany and France. That any superiorities other than those of mind and character should, in an institution of learning, be the marks of its acknowledged aris- tocracy, seems anomalous enough; but we fear the anomaly is not unknown in republican America. Educators especially should find these sane and earnest addresses useful and stimulating. We confess we find little in Mr. G.W. Steevens’s “With Kitchener to Khar- tum” (Dodd) that seems to us to justify the lavish encomiums heaped upon it by the higher class of English reviews. We can easily see why the ordinary newspaper should laud Mr. Stee- ven's book to the skies; for it contains just the sort of “hot stuff” that the ordinary newspaper has been University addresses by Principal Caird. The recent bloody business in the Sudan. for the past year or so especially desirious of get- ting, and would have at almost any price. If war should break out to-morrow (which God forbid!) the enterprising owners of our “live up-to-date.” newspapers might well put Mr. Steevens's book into the hands of the “bright young men” they pro- posed sending to the front, and say to them: “This is the kind of thing we want.” Mr. Steevens's book, in fine, is a clever and well-spiced piece of war-time reporting, made in a hurry on the spot and meant for immediate home consumption: but it is nothing more than that. Its vogue with the British public is easily explained. The Sirdar is just now the British public's especial hero, and Mr. Steevens tells what he did and lauds him without stint or reserva- tion for doing it; the British public, too, is for the first time in a quarter of a century or more unques- tionably in a fighting mood, and Mr. Steevens's battle-pictures give it much the same sort of grati- fication that our own public gets from “kineto- scope” views of the more crucial and historic pugi- listic events. Reading Mr. Steevens's cheery and often even jocular account of the Sudan campaign is almost as good (or as bad) as seeing the thing itself. Mr. Steevens has the knack of describing things vividly, and we don't mean to carp at him for giving his employers and the public their money's worth of gore and grewsomeness. But he might, it would seem, without loss of cash or credit, have written less flippantly, and with a more apparent sense of the fact that this tragic, if perhaps una- voidable, Sudan business—this scientific butchery of a half-armed mob of half-savage religionists — is a dark and deplorable episode in the history of the territorial conquests of Western civilization. Mr. Steevens, we are glad to note, appears to recog- nize the fact that, when the day of Omdurman was done, the palm of valor lay, not (broadly speaking) with the men who had been behind, but with those who had been before, the guns. The volume is supplied with maps and plans, and serves to convey a tolerably good idea of General Kitchener's meth- ods of dealing with the problem his predecessors had so egregiously failed to solve. Probably there is but one religious foundation in this country whose his- tory, adequately told, would require more than a duodecimo volume of three or four hundred pages. That one is the Parish of Trinity Church, New York City. It is a notable parish in many respects. Its annals are closely connected with those of the city in which it exists. The du- ties and responsibilities of its rector are greater than those of some of the bishops. It celebrated its bicentennial in 1897, and the elegant volume set- ting forth the proceedings in the nine churches com- prised in this immense city parish seems to have whetted the appetite of the parishioners for more history. So records running back to the early years of the seventeenth century have been ransacked, and the Rev. Dr. Dix, Rector, has begun the prepa- Parochial history extraordinary. 1899.] THE DIAL 129 º ration of a complete history of the parish. The result thus far is a royal octavo volume of over 500 pages, bringing the narrative down to 1783,- that is to say, down to the close of the Revolutionary War and the opening of the history of the parish under new ecclesiastical relations. All this is given with the promise of an indefinite number of volumes in the future to bring the history down to the pres- ent time. The history is considerably more than a transcript of musty records. It contains some val- uable contributions to general history. The author (who, because the task of research was necessarily committed to others, modestly claims to be merely an editor) is not a thresher of old straw. He pur- sues an independent course, corrects some errors which have crept into general history, notably con- cerning the character of Governor Fletcher and that of Leisler; and even corrects errors into which he confesses himself to have been drawn in previous historical writings. The volume is handsomely printed, and illustrated with full-page portraits and facsimiles of documents. The publishers (G. P. Putnam's Sons) announce that 750 copies of this edition have been printed for sale. A volume on “The Rivers of North America” (Putnam) is offered mod- estly by its author, Professor Israel C. Russell of the University of Michigan, as a “read- ing lesson for students” of physiography or geology. It proves to be a well-digested thesis upon the effects of rivers in fashioning the surfaces of the regions where they are generated or through which they flow. Each drop of aerial water does its work, infinitesimal though it may be. With its fellows, it takes certain substances into solution; others it holds in suspension; manifold more it pushes along, as, in obedience to gravity, it pursues its devious way toward a distant sea, ever wearing the chan- nels through which it flows. Even if, sooner or later, it should be lifted again by evaporation, it will have contributed something, if it be only to lay down in another place the atom which its solvent power seized elsewhere. In time, such drops will have carved the mountains, filled and seamed the valleys, eroded the cañons, and transformed all the contours of the earth's surface; in time, no coun- teracting upheaval occurring, they will have re- moved all elevations, and restored old ocean's vast and solitary reign. Professor Russell's logical and lucid treatment of his subject makes his “reader” attractive for both scientist and layman. — Another volume from the same publishers, “Earth Sculp- ture,” by Professor James Geikie of the University of Edinburgh, describes the configuration of the earth's surface as the resultant of every variety of physical activity, whether working internally or externally. The work includes the results of the latest geological surveys, notably those within the western half of the United States. The author has addressed the great body of intelligent readers not professionally versed in geology. Two recent books on Physiography. Mrs. Elizabeth Wormeley Latimer's “Scrap-Book of the French Revolu- tion” (McClurg) is made up of ma- terial gotten together by the author in the course of her work as a lecturer on the French Revolution. The book is frankly a compilation, and as such it has the distinctive merit that its contents are to a considerable extent drawn from unfamiliar and comparatively inaccessible sources. Of especial interest are the excerpts from the series of mono- graphs on the events of the Revolution published in the Paris “Figaro” during the years 1893, 1894, and 1895. The volume opens with some rather interesting reminiscences of an American, Thomas Waters Griffith, who resided in Paris from 1791 to 1799, and was an eye-witness of many dra- matic Revolutionary episodes. He saw, for instance, both Louis XVI. and his unhappy consort passing through the streets on their way to the scaffold— the former in “court-like dress’’ in “a handsome coach,” the latter in “a common cart” like an or- dinary malefactor, and attracting comparatively little attention from the populace. It is greatly to be regretted that Mr. Griffith was not a keener ob- server, or, at least, that he did not more fully realize the great historical and dramatic interest of the remarkable scenes he skims over so carelessly in his too cursory narrative. Mrs. Latimer's book contains a good deal of curious, suggestive reading, and deserves its popularity. There are twenty-nine portraits in half-tone, including an interesting one of the Rev. Eleazer Williams, the alleged “lost Dauphin,” whose singular story is given in the closing chapters on “Louis XVII.” Scrap-book of the French Revolution. Mr. A. G. Newcomer is one of those professors of rhetoric who believe that a writer should consider first what he would say, and only when that is settled should he consider what particular words to use. This obvious view is not common among our writers on rhetoric, although Mr. Newcomer’s “Elements of Rhetoric" (Holt) is by no means the only book in recent years which has been based upon it. The older writers — Professor Bain, for instance, or Professor A. S. Hill—prefer to begin with a study of words. The latter especially did great things in the cause of diction. Their influence has been such that most people (even in college faculties) think that there is no rhetorical fault worse than misspell- ing or bad grammar: such, at least, are the only faults ever mentioned. The newer practise is really not new : it has the authority of every rhetorician who ever put pen to paper, from the days of Korax and Tisias down to the time that Dr. George Camp- bell, with his speculations on Good Usage, knocked the classical rhetoric into a cocked-up hat, so far as authority was concerned. We do not mean that Mr. Newcomer is a neo-Aristotelian, or any other such creature: his earlier book, which had some- thing to do in bringing about the change of heart that is gradually taking place, was a very simple ** The New Rhetoric.” 180 [Feb. 16, THE DIAL talk to schoolboys and schoolgirls as to what they could write about best. It said nothing about Aris- totle: but then, it had nothing of Campbell either. The present work, founded on the right theory, and the result of individual work of some years on the right lines, has a great deal in it that is direct and practical. We are glad to see it, and hope we may help it a bit toward a wide circulation. It has been long years since a thor- oughly up-to-date one-volume Bible Dictionary made its appearance. The numerous discoveries of recent years in Bible lands and adjacent lands, the new investigations in Bib- lical archaeology and in Biblical criticism, have de- manded a re-writing of nearly every article in the Bible Dictionaries of a quarter of a century ago. Professor John D. Davis of Princeton Theological Seminary, with the coöperation of two of his col- leagues, Drs. Warfield and Purves, and after three years of incessant labor, has produced the book that is needed (Westminster Press, Philadelphia). It is a volume of 800 pages, covering the whole range of Biblical themes, and of the First Book of Maccabees. It aims to confine itself to facts, and to facts of the Scriptures and of records and things which throw light on the Bible. It very wisely leaves out spec- ulation about the Bible, which is usually short-lived and always of uncertain value. It is amply, almost profusely, illustrated with pictures, not of the imag- ination, but of the actual things themselves. Several up-to-date maps, based on the most recent discov- eries and authorities, were prepared especially for this work. The articles are well-proportioned in length and fulness of treatment. Their position is that, not of a hide-bound conservative, but of a pro- gressive and safe leader in the interpretation of the facts of the Bible. The up-to-date character, the fulness of illustration, the wealth of maps, the pro- gressive position, and the cheapness of the volume ought to make this the one-volume Dictionary of the Bible for many years to come. In “The Wonderful Century " (Dodd), Mr. Alfred Russel Wallace discusses in two aspects the scientific achievements of the century now closing. In one group he enumerates the theoretical discoveries with the practical invention resting thereupon. His list includes twelve examples of the first — such as the conservation of energy, organic evolution, the ground theories of chemistry; and twelve of the second—as railways, telegraphs, photography, and the use of anaesthetics and antiseptics. With this list he compares all the discoveries of preceding ages, of which he names fifteen — as gravitation and the circulation of the blood, the art of printing, the mariner's compass, and the telescope. In a con- trasted group of what he calls the failures of the century, the author enumerates subjects as to which he insists that the scientific world has fallen into lamentable errors, either by underrating or by A new one-volume Bible Dictionary. A review of the century. wholly ignoring their real significance and value, as in the neglect of phrenology and the opposition to hypnotism and psychical research; or by over- valuing what he holds to be delusive and mischiev- ous, as vaccination and militarism, which latter he calls the curse of civilization. The book has an interest as illustrating the excursions of a distin- guished naturalist into fields outside of his specialty. The first part of it almost any well-informed scien- tist might have written; the second part scarcely any such person would have written. We are glad to have an English Ferdinand - - Brunetière translation, and one which has been in English. made with unusual skill, of M. Ferdinand Brunetière’s “Manual of the History of French Literature” (Crowell). The work is so masterly an example of such a history, so solid in its scholarship and so attractive in its setting-forth, that it is valuable both on its own account and as a model of how such a thing ought to be done. The plan is rather original. The text is a philosophical essay in the author's familiar manner, while the erudition is relegated to the footnotes which occupy about half of each page. The author calls his work “an application of the doctrine of Evolution to the history of a great literature.” The translation bears the assumed name of “Ralph Derechef.” Sixteen portraits illustrate the volume. —We are glad also to welcome in this connection the volume of “Brunetière's Essays in French Literature,” selected and translated by Mr. D. Nichol Smith, and imported by Messrs. Charles Scribner's Sons. The volume includes seven of the author's most characteristic essays, and a special preface written by him for this translation. Sir Edward W. Hamilton's thought- ful and commendably temperate monograph on Gladstone (Scribner) has the prima facie recommendation of being from the pen of a man who knew the great statesman well for nearly forty years, and was closely asso- ciated with him during a considerable portion of that period. Sir Edward aims to convey to his readers a just notion of Mr. Gladstone the man, through describing some of his intellectual powers, characteristics, and accomplishments, some of his ways, aims, and objects, his likes and dislikes, and his general turn of mind. The little book is well worth reading, and while it cannot be said to throw any special new light on Mr. Gladstone's singularly complex character, its observations are in general just, well-weighed, and discriminating. A minor biography of Gladstone. It would have been singularly im- proper to have had a “Famous Scots” series without a life of Sir William Wallace: scarcely a Scot is more famous. Yet it was no easy task to write that life. Too little is known of Wallace, for one thing; and for another, too little is known by the general reader of the history and general life of Scotland at the be- Biography of a famous Scot. 1899.] THE IDIAL 131 ginning of the fourteenth century. At any rate, one gets but a hazy notion of the hero or of his oppor- tunity, in the volume by Professor Murison (im- ported by Scribner). The chief figure is shadowy; the circumstances are like those of a dream. The result may be imagined: killings and burnings, victories and defeats, plottings and betrayals, we get a confused vision of such matters, but no clear understanding. This volume is hardly as interest- ing as most of the series, a matter not entirely chargeable to the author. It gives us something of an account of a simple and violent career in a troub- lous and complicated time. We think most readers will know more of Wallace after they have read it than before; but further it would be rather hard to go in the way of praise. M. de Saint-Amand’s “The Court of the Second Empire, 1856–1858." (Scribner) is a rather exceptionally animated and interesting number of the sub-series of this brilliant writer's popular historical studies now current. The three years bridging the time from the Crimean War to the Italian war of 1859 form the epoch covered in this book. The salient episodes treated are the coronation of the Czar Alexander II., the Orsini attempt, and the diplo- matic preludes to the war which led immediately to the liberation from Austrian rule of northern Italy. Separate chapters are devoted to Walewski, De Morny, and Cavour. There are four portraits. Court of the Second Empire. BRIEFER MENTION. “The More Excellent Way” (Oxford University Press) is a volume of brief selections in verse and prose, all relating to the “Life of Love,” compiled by the Hon. Mrs. Lyttelton Gell. The very wide range of au- thors represented would seem to bear out the statement that “a poet without love were a physical and moral impossibility.” The selections are admirably classified under appropriate readings, and have been chosen with great art and taste. Less, however, is to be said for the taste of the publishers. The combination of dark blue cover with pale-green edges makes a homely exte- rior; the same combination within, used for type and decorative designs, makes a striking but not beautiful printed page. Mr. W. E. H. Lecky's “Democracy and Liberty” (Longmans) has just passed into a second edition, and the author avails himself of the opportunity thus pre- sented to discuss, in a special introduction of some fifty pages, “the experience of the last eventful years.” In the light of this experience, the outlook seems even gloomier than it did before, and the new introduction, to say nothing of the book itself, is far from cheerful reading. But the problems which it raises are to be solved only by facing them bravely and squarely; and no writer of our time brings to their discussion a more penetrative insight or a riper wisdom. Judging from the example we have seen, the novel “Color Prints” of Miss Pamela Colman Smith should meet with considerable favor. The term “print” as applied to these pictures seems to us ill-advised and misleading, as it naturally suggests the use of litho- graphy or some other method of mechanical reproduc- tion. In reality, the outline only of the picture is printed, this being then filled in by hand in water-color and retouched by the artist. The colors are chosen with taste, and are carefully applied, and the effect of the finished work is both artistic and pleasing. Five sub- jects have been issued, varying in price from two to five dollars each,-remarkably cheap, when the amount of work involved is considered. The prints are pub- lished by Mr. R. H. Russell. Mr. Austin Dobson's fondness for the eighteenth cen- tury is shown once more in his volume of “Miscellanies” (Dodd). Nearly all of its thirteen papers concern them- selves with books or authors of that period—as Gold- smith, Steele, Dr. Johnson, Gay; others have to do with London of that date or earlier. “Old Whitehall,” with a reduced ground-plan of the Royal Palace as it was in the year 1680, and “Changes in Charing Cross,” looking back to the time of Queen Elizabeth, are chapters to delight the antiquary; for of Dobson, as of his favorite Goldsmith, it may be said, “He touches nothing that he does not adorn. A fifth edition of the late Professor Martin’s “briefer course” in “The Human Body,” revised by Dr. George Wells Fitz, has just been published by Messrs. Henry Holt & Co. The work still has the perfunctory chapter on narcotics, without which it could not be used in the schools of a number of States, but Dr. Fitz takes pains to state that this chapter “is retained against the best judgment of the reviser, who believes that the questions involved are ethical and not physiological.” The book is, of course, aside from this defect, one of the best elementary manuals of human anatomy and physiology that have ever been written. In another text-book of the same subject, written by Dr. E. Franklin Smith, and published by Mr. William R. Jenkins, the chapter on narcotics volunteers the delightful statement that “tee- total drinks” contain from six to fourteen per cent of alcohol, coming somewhere between claret and cham- pagne in the list. - “Where to Educate,” published by Messrs. Brown & Co., Boston, is described as “a guide to the best private schools, higher institutions of learning, etc., in the United States.” It is a volume of nearly four hundred pages, and is edited by Miss Grace Powers Thomas. She sup- plies a good deal of information that may give the book value for reference, but she has not always been on her guard. Among the Illinois institutions which are included we find, to our amazement, one of the chief offenders in the matter of fraudulent degrees, the estab- lishment which more than any other has led to the pro- posed legislation which we discuss in the editorial pages of this issue. Miscellaneous reading-books for the young are of all sorts nowadays. Among the more recent of them we mention “Uncle Robert's Geography” (Appleton), ed- ited by Mr. F. W. Parker and Miss Nellie L. Helm; “Our Country's Flag and the Flags of Foreign Coun- tries” (Appleton), by Dr. Edward S. Holden; “Poetry of the Seasons” (Silver), compiled by Miss Mary I. Lovejoy; “Historic Boston and Its Neighborhood” (Appleton), by Dr. Edward Everett Hale; “Heroes of the Middle West” (Ginn), by Mrs. Mary Hartwell Catherwood; and “First Steps in the History of Our Country” (Silver), by Messrs. W. A. Mowry and A. M. Mowry. 132 [Feb. 16, THE DIAL LITERARY NOTES. “Paul et Virginie,” edited by Professor Oscar Kuhns, is one of the latest of the French texts published by Messrs. Henry Holt & Co. A teacher's manual of “United States History in Elementary Schools,” by Mrs. L. L. W. Wilson, is published by the Macmillan Co. “Plane and Solid Germany,” by Dr. James Howard Gore, is an elementary text-book, just published by Messrs. Longmans, Green, & Co. “The Attic Theatre,” by Mr. A. E. Haigh, has passed into a second and considerably enlarged edition, which comes to us from Mr. Henry Frowde of the Oxford Clarendon Press. A “Critique of Some Recent Subjunctive Theories,” by Mr. Charles Edwin Bennett, forms No. IX. of the “Cornell Studies in Classical Philology,” published by the Macmillan Co. “A Complete Latin Grammar,” by Professor Albert Harkness, is the final product of many revisions and much teaching experience. The American Book Co. are the publishers. “The Rig-Veda Mantras in the Grhya Sutras” is a doctor's dissertation prepared for the Johns Hopkins University by Mr. Edwin W. Fay, and published at Roanoke, Virginia. As a valentine to their friends, the “Brothers of the Book” have issued a beautifully-printed leaflet con- taining Mrs. Rosamund Marriott-Watson's poem, “Old Books, Fresh Flowers.” “The Principles of Agriculture” (Macmillan), by Mr. L. H. Bailey, is a “text-book for schools and rural societies,” written from the widest knowledge of its subject, and admirably adapted for its purpose. Miss Bertha Ellen Lovewell has edited “The Life of St. Cecilia” from a number of Middle English manu- scripts, and the monograph is published by Messrs. Lamson, Wolffe, & Co. in the series of “Yale Studies in English.” Miss Emma Helen Blair has prepared a valuable “Annotated Catalogue of Newspaper Files in the Library of the State Historical Society of Wisconsin.” The work, which is a pamphlet of nearly four hundred pages, ap- pears as a state publication. “A Short History of France” and “A Short His- tory of Germany,” both by Miss Mary Platt Parmele, are now published by Messrs. Charles Scribner's Sons in new editions, uniform with the similar volumes upon England, Spain, and the United States. Messrs. Allyn & Bacon publish two volumes of En- glish texts: “Select Essays and Poems” of Emerson, edited by Miss Eva March Tappan; and “Three Nar- rative Poems” (“The Ancient Mariner,” “Sohrab and Rustum,” “Enoch Arden”), edited by Mr. George A. Watrous. Mr. F. C. Burnand, the editor of “Punch,” has con- sented to write a series of articles giving personal remi- miscences of most of the authors and artists connected with that famous periodical during the last twenty-five years. The articles will appear in the “Pall Mall Magazine.” A series of “Ethno-Geographic Readers” (Heath), by Mr. Frederick Starr, is to consist of three volumes — “Strange Peoples,” “American Indians,” and “How Men Do.” The first and third of these are still in pre- paration, but the second has been issued, and proves to be a very readable account of the North American Indian, written in simple language, and attractively illustrated. The reading-lesson should be welcome to the boy who takes it from such a book as this. The late A. H. Green of Oxford left the manuscript of an unfinished text-book of elementary geology, and his widow commissioned Mr. J. F. Blake to prepare it for publication. The result is a volume called “First Lessons in Modern Geology,” published by the Oxford University Press. The publishers of the Old South Leaflets have just issued two numbers entitled respectively “Lafayette in the American Revolution” and “Letters of Washington and Lafayette.” The publication is most timely in view of the Lafayette monument, the gift of the American people, to be erected in Paris next year. Mr. John B. Dunbar has edited Cooper's “The Last of the Mohicans,” for the series of “Standard English Classics" published by Messrs. Ginn & Co. It makes an attractive volume of more than five hundred pages, and the boy who has it for a school-book will surely think that his lot is cast in pleasant places. “The Technology Review” is a new quarterly peri- odical published by the Association of Class Secretaries of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. It is mod- elled rather closely upon the “Harvard Graduates Mag- azine,” which amounts to saying that it is a dignified and creditable production which we shall welcome to our table. The volume of “Studies in American History” just published by Mr. J. H. Miller, Lincoln, Nebraska, includes the ten pamphlets of “source extracts” made by Mr. Howard W. Caldwell, which we have mentioned from time to time as they have come to us, and for which we are happy to find a word of renewed com- mendation. “The Uncommercial Traveller,” with four illustra- tions by Mr. Harry Furniss, has been added to the hand- some “Gadshill” edition of Dickens, imported by Messrs. Charles Scribner's Sons. The spirit of Cruik- shank and “Phiz" seems to have caught successfully by Mr. Furniss in his pictures, the frontispiece portrait being especially good. Pending the construction of a new and modern build- ing, which will be planned to meet the needs of their constantly increasing business, the Western Methodist Book Concern will occupy the large corner store of the Edson Keith Building, Wabash Avenue and Monroe Street, a region that seems likely to become the “book- sellers' row” of Chicago. “The World's Painters and their Pictures” (Ginn), by Mr. Deristhe L. Hoyt, is an elementary descriptive and historical manual intended for school use. It is little more than a compendium of the barest facts and the most condensed critical judgments, supplied with enough process illustrations to save the text from being absolutely meaningless to a young student. The total destruction by fire of Messrs. A. C. McClurg & Co.'s fine Chicago bookstore, which occurred on the 12th inst., is an event not measurable by the money loss alone, although this approaches the sum of half a million dollars. The store was renowned as one of the largest and best in the world, and its vast stock con- tained many rare items that cannot be replaced, auto- graph copies, books in exquisite foreign bindings, treas- ures of the bookhunter and bibliophile, by whom the 1899.] THE I)IAL 183 loss will be especially deplored. We are glad to an- nounce that the firm already occupies new quarters at the corner of Wabash Avenue and Monroe Street, one square south of the old location. We have received from the Century Co. the two bound volumes of “St. Nicholas” for 1898, as well as the volume of the “Century Magazine” for the half- year ending last October. There is a good deal of war in these volumes, which is natural enough, but there are also other features of interest, including (as far as the “Century” volume is concerned) Dr. Mitchell's “Fran- çois” and a half dozen of Mr. Cole's superb wood- engravings. The death of Archibald Lampman, on the tenth of this month, at the early age of thirty-eight, is no small loss to Canadian literature and English poetry. His two volumes, “Among the Millet” and “Lyrics of Earth,” together with his many contributions to the periodicals, gave him a high place among that remark- able group of young Canadian poets whose work has made us here in the United States look somewhat search- ingly to our own laurels. Professor William Morris Davis, with the aid of Mr. William Henry Snyder, has prepared a school “Physical Geography” which is published by Messrs. Ginn & Co. It is a volume of ordinary dimensions—not the extra- ordinary ones that used to be associated with text-books of this subject–very abundantly illustrated, and thor- oughly praiseworthy in its presentation of theories and facts. The name of Professor Davis, indeed, is all the guarantee of excellence that such a work needs. That readable literary magazine, “The Bookman,” announces the publication in its pages of Mr. Paul Leicester Ford's historical novel of the American Rev- olution, “Janice Meredith,” the first instalment to ap- pear in the March number. This story has already, we believe, been running for several issues in “Collier's Weekly.” The “syndicate” method of publication, it would thus appear, is to be extended to the monthly magazines, – a doubtful experiment, as it seems to us. A considerable quantity of French lyrical poetry, in which the most recent singers are fairly represented, is given us in the volume of “French Lyrics” which Professor Arthur Graves Canfield has edited for Messrs. Henry Holt & Co. Upwards of sixty poets are included, with an average of four pieces each, although the space given to Hugo, Lamartine, Musset, Leconte de Lisle, and M. Sully-Prudhomme makes this statement one to be taken with allowances. The book is excellent in every way—in taste, scholarship, and sense of propor- tion. The Committee on Libraries and Schools of the National Educational Association is at present engaged in collecting materials for a report to be made next July. The subjects under consideration include the preparation of graded lists of books suitable for chil- dren, the correlation of public library and school work, normal school work in the use of books by teachers, and other related topics. There is a wide field of usefulness before this Committee, and the coöperation of all inter- ested persons is solicited by the chairman, Mr. J. C. Dana, Springfield, Mass. Messrs. G. P. Putnam's Sons announce the publica- tion of “The American Anthropologist,” a new quar- terly journal established under the auspices of the anthropological section of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. The Board of Editors comprises such men as Messrs. D. G. Brinton, F. W. Putnam, W. H. Holmes, Franz Boas, and J. W. Powell —in a word, the most distinguished American scholars in this branch of science. Each number will contain two hundred pages of text and illustrations. Four dol- lars is the annual subscription. The Association of Collegiate Alumnae has recently added to its publications a “Magazine Number” which we have examined with much interest. No announce- ment is made of its continuation as a serial publication, but we wish that such an undertaking might prove prac- ticable, for a monthly, or even a quarterly, periodical of this character would be a welcome addition to our edu- cational literature. The contributors include such women as Mrs. Alice Upton Pearmain, Miss Abby Leach, Miss Marion Talbot, Miss Emily James Smith, Miss M. Carey Thomas, Miss Louise Brownell, and Mrs. Paul Shorey. Mrs. Shorey's interesting paper upon “The Collegiate Alumnae and the Public Schools of Chicago.” affords a typical illustration of the sort of work the Association is doing, good unobtrusive work of a kind that might accomplish much for the betterment of public education. The publication is issued from Richmond Hill, New York. LIST OF NEW BOOKS. [The following list, containing 65 titles, includes books received by THE DIAL since its last issue.] HISTORY. The Story of France. From the earliest times to the Con- sulate of Napoleon Bonaparte. By Thomas E. Watson. Wol. I., To the End of the Reign of Louis XV. 8vo, gilt top, uncut, pp. 712. Macmillan Co. $2.50. The Story of the Civil War. ByJohn Codman Ropes, LL.D. Part II., The Campaigns of 1862. With maps and plans, large 8vo, uncut, pp. 475. G. P. Putnam's Sons. $2.50. America in Hawaii: A History of United States Influence. in the Hawaiian Islands. By Edmund Janes Carpenter. { "sº gilt top, uncut, pp. 275. Small, Maynard & 1.50. Second Annual Report of the Historical Manuscripts Com- mission of the American Historical Association. Large 8vo, uncut, pp. 679. Government Printing Office. Paper. Rhode Island and the Formation of the Union. By Frank Greene. Bates, Ph.D. Large 8vo, uncut, pp. 226. “Columbia College Studies.” Macmi Co. Paper. A Short History of France, and A Short History of Ger- many. By Mary Platt Parmele. 12mo. Charles Scrib- ner's Sons. Each, 60 cts. net. BIOGRAPHY AND MEMOIRS. My Inner Life: Being a Chapter in Personal Evolution and Autobiography. By John Beattie Crozier. Large 8vo, uncut, pp. 562. Longmans, Green, & Co. $4.50 John Sullivan Dwight, Brook-Farmer, Editor, and Critic of Music. By George Willis Cooke. With portrait, 8vo, uncut, pp. 297. Small, Maynard & Co. $2. GENERAL LITERATURE. A History of English Romanticism in the Eighteenth Century. By Henry A. Beers. 8vo, gilt top, uncut, pp. 455. Henry Holt & Co. $2. Plains and Uplands of Old France: A Book of Verse and Prose. By Henry Copley Greene. Illus., 16mo, gilt top, uncut, pp. 139. Small, Maynard & Co. $1.50. Théophile: A Miracle Play. By Henry Copley Greene. With frontispiece, 16mo, uncut, pp. 32. Small, Maynard & Co. $1. net. Fireside Fancies. By Beulah C. Garretson. 16mo, gilt top, uncut, pp. 220. J. B. Lippincott Co. $1.25. Adobeland Stories. By Werner Z. Reed. pp. 179. Richard G. Badger & Co. $1. If Tam O'Shanter'd Had a Wheel, and Other Poems and Sketches. By Grace Duffie Boylan. Illus., 12mo, uncut, pp. 222. E. R. Herrick & Co. $1.25. 12mo, uncut, 134 THE DIAL [Feb. 16, NEW EDITIONS OF STANDARD LITERATURE. Complete Works of Robert Browning, “Camberwell ?” edition. Edited by Charlotte Porter and Helen A. Clarke. In 12 vols., with photogravure frontispieces, 24mo, gilt tops. T. Y. Crowell & Co. Boxed, $9. Eighteenth Century Letters. Edited by R. Brimley Johnson. In 2 vols., with phot vure portraits, 12mo, gilt tops, uncut. Henry Holt º: Per vol., $1.75 met. The Virginians. By W. M. Thackeray. “Biographical” edition, with Introduction by Anne Thackeray Ritchie. Illus., 8vo, gilt top, uncut, pp. 809. Harper & Brothers, $1.75. POETRY. Wessex Poems, and Other Verses. By Thomas Hardy; illus. by the author. 8vo, gilt top, uncut, pp. 210. Harper & Brothers. $1.75. Along the Trail: A Book of Lyrics. By Richard Hovey. 16mo, pp. 115. Small, Maynard & Co. $1.50. FICTION. The Open Question: A Tale of Two Temperaments. By C. E. Raimond. 12mo, pp. 523. Harper & Brothers. $1.50. The Wheel of God. By George Egerton. 12mo, pp. 364. G. P. Putnam's Sons. $1.; paper, 50 cts. Windyhaugh. By Graham Travers (Margaret G. Todd, M.D.). 12mo, pp. 418. D. Appleton & Co. $1.50. The Archdeacon. By L. B. Walford. 12mo, pp. 274. Longmans, Green, & Co. $1.50. God's Prisoners. By John Oxenham. 12mo, pp.314. Henry Holt & Co. $1.25. A Writer of Books. By George Paston. 12mo, pp. 344. D. Appleton & Co. $1.; paper, 50 cts. Sundown Leflare. Written and illustrated by Frederic Remington. 12mo, pp. 115. Harper & Brothers. $1.25. That Gay Deceiver! By Albert Ross. 12mo, pp. 306. G. W. Dillingham Co. $1.; paper, 50cts. Van Hoff; or, The New Faust. By Alfred Smythe. 12mo, pp. 322. G. W. Dillingham Co. Paper, 50 cts. TRAVEL AND DESCRIPTION. Spinifex and Sand: A Narrative of Five Years' Pioneering and Exploration in Western Australia. By the Hon. David W. Carnegie. Illus., large 8vo, gilt top, uncut, pp. 454. M. F. Mansfield & Co. $5. A Gold Hunter's Experience. By Chalkley J. Hambleton. 16mo, gilt top, uncut, pp. 116. Chicago: Privately printed. SCIENCE. The History of Mankind. By Professor Friedrich Ratzel; trans. from the 2d German edition by A. J. Butler, M.A.; with Introduction by E. B. Tylor, D.C.L. Vol. III., completing the work. Illus, in colors, etc., large 8vo, gilt top, pp. 599. Macmillan Co. $4. The Foundations of Zoëlogy. By William Keith Brooks, Ph.D. Large 8vo, uncut, pp. 339. “Columbia Univer- sity Biological Series.” Macmillan Co. $2.50 met. A Guide to the Study of the Geological Collections of the New York State Museum. By Frederick J. H. Merrill, Ph.D. Illus., º 8vo, pp. 262. Albany: University of the State of New York. Paper, 40 cts. POLITICAL, SOCIAL, AND ECONOMIC STUDIES. Democracy and Liberty. By William Edward Hartpole ky. New edition; in 2 vols., 12mo, gilt tops, uncut. Longmans, Green, & Co. - Democracy: A Study in Government. By James H. Hºp. Ph.D. 12mo, pp. 300. Charles Scribner's Sons. 1.50. Slav or Saxon: A Study of the Growth and Tendencies of Russian Civilization. By William Dudley Foulke. Sec- ond edition, revised; 12mo, pp. 141. “Questions of the Day.” G. P. Putnam's Sons. $1. Social Settlements. By C. R. Henderson. 18mo, pp. 196. New York: Lentilhon & Co. 50 cts. History of State Banking in Maryland. By Alfred Cook- man Bryan, Ph.D. Large 8vo, uncut, pp. 144. “Johns Hopkins University Studies.” Paper. THEOLOGY AND RELIGION. The Study of Holy Scripture: A General Introduction. By Charles Augustus Briggs, D.D. Large 8vo, pp. 688. Charles Scribner's Sons, gº net. Religion in Greek Literature: A Sketch in Outline. By Lewis Campbell, M.A. Large 8vo, uncut, pp. 423. Long- mans, Green, & Co. $5. The Kingdom (Basileia): An Exegetical Study. By George Dana Boardman. 8vo, pp.348. tº: Sons. $2. Morality as a Religion: An Exposition of Some First Prin- ciples. By W. R. Washington Sullivan. 12mo, uncut, pp. 296. Mºin Co. $2. The Conception of Priesthood in the Early Church and in the Church of England: Four Sermons. By W. Sanday, D. 12mo, uncut, pp. 128. Longmans, Green, & Co. $1. Suggestive Illustrations on the Gospel of John. By Rev. §: Nºt D.D. 12mo, pp. 543. E. R. Herrick & o, $1.25. ARCHITECTURE. – MUSIC. The Georgian Period: Being Measured Drawings of Colo- nial Work. By various architects. In three parts, large 4to. Boston: Am. Architect and Building News Co. $9. By the Way: Being a Collection of Short Essays on Music and Art in General. By William Foster Apthorp. In 2 vols., 18mo, uncut. Copeland & Day. $1.50. REFERENCE. General Index to the Library Journal, Wols. 1–22 (Sep- tember 1876, to December, 1897). Large 8vo, pp. 130. New York: The Library Journal. Where to Educate: A Guide to the Best Private Schools and Higher Institutions of Learning in the United States. Edited by Grace Powers Thomas. Illus., large 8vo, pp. 382. Boston: Brown & Co. $3. EDUCATION.—BOOKS FOR SCHOOL AND COLLEGE. Discussions in Education. By Francis A. Walker, Ph.D.; edited by James Phinney Munroe. Large 8vo, uncut, pp. 342. Henry Holt & Co. $3. net. German Higher Schools: The History, Organization, and Methods of Secondary Education in Germany. By James E. Russell, Ph.D. 8vo, pp. 455. Longmans, Green, & Co. $2.25. The World's Painters and their Pictures. By Deristhe L. Hoyt. Illus., 12mo, pp. 272. Ginn & Co. $1.40. The Principles of Agriculture: A Text-Book for Schools and Rural Societies. Edited by L. H. Bailey, Illus., 16mo, pp. 300. “Rural Science Series.” Macmillan Co. $1.25. The Human Body: A Text-Book of Anatomy, Physiology, and Hygiene. By H. Newell Martin, D.Sc. #ifth edition, revised by George Wells Fitz, M.D. Illus., 12mo, pp. 408. Henry Holt & Co. $1.20. Elements of Rhetoric: A Course in Plain Prose Composition. By Alphonso G. Newcomer. 12mo, pp. 382. Henry Holt & Co. $1. French Lyrics. Selected and edited by Arthur Graves Canfield. 16mo, pp. 382. Henry Holt & Co. $1. Sainte-Pierre's Paul et Virginie. Edited by Oscar Kuhns. 16mo, pp. 160. Henry Holt & Co. 50 cts. Elements of Grammar and Composition. By E. Oram Lyte, A.M. 12mo, pp. 224. American Book Co. 50 cts. American Indians. By Frederick Starr. Illus., 12mo, pp. 227. D. C. Heath & Co. 45 cts. A Primary Arithmetic. By A. R. Hornbrook, A.M. 12mo, pp. 253. American Book Co. 40 cts. Elementary English, By E. Oram Lyte, A.M. Illus., 12mo, pp. 160. American Book Co. 35 cts. Coleridge's Ancient Mariner, etc. Edited by Tuley Francis Huntington, A. M. With portrait, 18mo, pp. 109. Mac- millan Co. 25 cts. MISCELLANEOUS. The Attic Theatre: A Description of the Stage and Theatre of the Athenians, and of the Dramatic Performances at Athens. By A. E. Haigh. M.A. Second edition, revised and in part rewritten. Illus., large 8vo, uncut, pp. 420. Oxford University Press, $3.10. Li Livres du Gouvernement des Rois: AXIIIth Century French Version of Egidio Colonna's Treatise "De º: ine Principum,” Now First Published from the Kerr MS. Edited by Samuel Paul Molenaer, A.M. With frontispiece, 8vo, gilt top, uncut, pp. 461. Macmillan Co. $3. net. Studies in International Law. By Thomas Erskine Hol- land, D.C.L. Large 8vo, uncut, pp. 314. Oxford Univer- sity Press. $2.60. THE DIAL 3 &tmi-ſºlonthlg 3ournal of 3Literarg Criticism, HBigtuggion, amb Information. THE DIAL (founded in 1880) is published on the 1st and 16th of each month. TERMs of SUBscRIPTION, 82.00 a year in advance, postage prepaid in the United States, Canada, and Merico; in other countries comprised in the Postal Union, 50 cents a year for extra postage must be added. Unless otherwise ordered, subscriptions will begin with the current number. REMITTANCEs should be by draft, or by express or postal order, payable to THE DIAL. SPECIAL RATEs to CLUBs and for subscriptions with other publications will be sent on application; and SAMPLE Copy on receipt of 10 cents. Advertisng RATEs furnished on application. All communications should be addressed to THE DIAL, 315 Wabash Ave., Chicago. MARCH 1, 1899. No. 305. Vol. XXVI. CONTENTS. - page THE LITERARY LIFE . . . . . . . . . . 143 LITERARY STANDARDS. R. W. Conant . . . 145 COMMUNICATIONS . . . . 147 School Legislation for Large Cities and Small. Aaron Gove. The Renaissances in Japan. Ernest W. Clement. An English Version of “Barbara Freitchie.” J. G. M. “Death to the Spanish Yoke.” THE MEMORIALS OF LORD SELEORNE. E. G. J. 149 THE SECOND YEAR OF THE CIVIL WAR. Charles H. Cooper . . . . . . . . . . . 151 THE FUNCTIONS AND REVENUES OF GOVERN- MENT. Mar West . . . . . . . . . . . 153 TWO GREAT. EVANGELISTS. Hiram M. Stanley 154 TRAVEL IN MANY LANDS. Ira M. Price . . . 156 Conway's With Ski and Sledge.—Hyne's Through Arctic Lapland. – Robertson's Chitral. — Mrs. Armstrong-Hopkins's Within the Purdah. — Little's Through the Yangtse Gorges. – Rathborne's Camp- ing and Tramping in Malaya.--Stoddard's A Cruise under the Crescent. – Rose's With the Greeks in Thessaly.— Burrows's The Land of the Pigmies. Alexander Jessup. BRIEFS ON NEW BOOKS . . . . . . . . . . 158 More history of the Royal Navy.—Story of the Union of Italy. — “Trimalchio's Dinner.” — Twelve cen- turies of British history.-C. A. Dana's Recollections of the Civil War.—Newly discovered early poems of Shelley.—Social life and requirements in the British Army.—Modern German culture.— Growth and curi- osities of South London. — Foundations and mutual relations of the sciences. – American essays and ad- dresses.—Historic Pilgrimages in New England. — With De Soto in Florida. BRIEFER MENTION . . . . . . . . . . . . 162 LITERARY NOTES . . . . . . . . . . . . 163 TOPICS IN LEADING PERIODICALS . . . . . 163 LIST OF NEW BOOKS . . . . . . . . . . . 164 THE LITERARY LIFE. There are many deserving persons to whom “The Pen and the Book” — for thus is Sir Walter Besant's latest pronouncement entitled — will bring cheer. They are the persons who fondly imagine themselves to be leading, wholly or in part, the Literary Life, yet who find the public looking somewhat askance at their pro- fession, and inclined to subject their pretensions to a considerable discount. They are haunted by the fear that their efforts will be disparag- ingly dubbed journalism; or, even if it be ad- mitted that they produce what are to outward seeming books, that the harsh world will clas- sify these productions among the biblia a-biblia of Charles Lamb's famous catalogue. Smart- ing under such cynical thrusts, these worthy souls may take heart again at the words, “When, therefore, we speak of the Literary Life, it should include all those who produce literature.” And, lest any modest scribbler should still be in doubt as to whether this definition is catholic enough to cover his own product, the assurance quickly follows: “I include the whole of current printed work— good and bad, the whole production of the day — whatever is offered.” Being thus con- vinced that he is leading the Literary Life — of which he may even have had no suspicion up to this time — our supposititious writer will be pleased to read a little farther on, that “the Literary Life may be, in spite of many dangers and drawbacks, by far the happiest life that the Lord has permitted mortal man to enjoy.” This is warming to the cockles of the heart, and he would be a morose penman indeed who could fail to catch something of the glow of the author's cheery optimism. Sir Walter's roseate imagination is at its best when he is engaged in a statistical presentation of the reading public, or when he is contrasting the Literary Life of the eighteenth century with that of the nineteenth or twentieth. “Look here, upon this picture, and on this,” he seems to say as he pens the following contrasted passages: “Come back with me for a moment to the middle of the eighteenth century. . . . Everybody proclaimed in some way or other by his appearance the nature of his calling: and everybody enjoyed in this way such dignity and respect as belonged to his calling. How did the poet appear? He was to be seen every day and all day 144 [March 1, THE DIAL long: he haunted the coffee-houses, the eating-houses, and the taverns of Fleet Street and its neighborhood. Alone among men he had no uniform. Yet he could be recognized by his rags. Everybody knew the company of wits in the tavern: they were notoriously, horribly poor; notoriously they had neither principles nor honour; nor dignity: for a guinea, it was said, they would write satires, epigrams, anything for or against either side or anybody. Since the people only saw the ragged side, they supposed that the whole army was in rags; it seemed to them the only profession whose normal or customary condition was one of rags. “Let us consider next what is the kind of life led daily by the modern man of letters—not a great genius, not a popular author: but a good steady man of letters of the kind which formerly had to inhabit the garrets of Grub Street. This man, of whom there are many— or this woman, for many women now belong to the pro- fession—goes into his study every morning as regu- larly as a barrister goes to chambers; he finds on his desk two or three books waiting for review; a MS. sent him for an opinion; a book of his own to go on with – possibly a life of some dead and gone worthy for a series; an article which he has promised for a magazine; a paper for the “Dictionary of National Biography’; perhaps an unfinished novel to which he must give three hours of absorbed attention. This goes on, day after day, all the year round. There is never any fear of the work failing as soon as the writer has made himself known as a trustworthy and an attentive workman. The literary man has his club: he makes an income by his labour which enables him to live in comfort, and to ed- ucate his children properly. Now, this man a hundred years ago would have been — what you have seen—an object of contempt for his poverty and helplessness: the cause of contempt for Literature itself.” The picture thus outlined for us of the life of the professional literary worker of our own times is certainly a pleasant one, and it does not seem to us overdrawn, except possibly as to the practical certainty of continuous employ- ment. It is, however, a life that is possible only in a very small number of the largest centres of population and publishing enterprise. In the United States, for example, it is unques- tionably possible in New York, precariously possible in about three other cities, and prac- tically impossible anywhere else. If Sir Walter works no great wonders with his descriptions, he certainly does with his figures. We may possibly allow his estimate that twenty thousand persons in England are to-day, wholly or in part, leading the Literary Life, although to do this the words “in part" must receive much emphasis, since the census returns show less than six thousand actually classified as authors, editors, and journalists. For the United States, we should have nearly to double these figures; and we reflect, not without amusement, that even the lesser num- ber provided by the census must include the editors of country newspapers and the compilers of city directories. Still, we may admit that in this country forty thousand persons may pos- sibly, at some time or other, do some kind of writing for publication in books or periodicals. But when we come to Sir Walter's notion of the reading public, the imagination fairly balks at the figures offered for our acceptance. First of all, he estimates that in 1750 the “possible readers or inquirers after new books” numbered thirty thousand in the three kingdoms. Eighty years later, in 1830, this number may have increased to fifty thousand. So far, so good. These figures are certainly conservative enough. But when the author contemplates the reading public that to-day awaits the new English books, he loses the sense of proportion. Because one hundred and twenty millions of people all over the earth are able to read the English language, he assumes that most of them are eagerly fol- lowing the literary developments of the period. For seventy years ago, he will allow only one person in about five hundred to have been “interested in new books.” Now, owing to the spread of popular education, he thinks of the whole five hundred (including children in arms) as readers. In other words, while mak- ing excessive reductions for the earlier years selected for comparison, he allows no deductions at all for the present and the future. This statement will seem so astonishing as to need a quotation in verification. Here it is: “In fifty years' time, unless some check — some everwhelming national disaster — happens to this country, or the United States, or to our colonies, the population of the English-speaking race will be more than doubled. There will be at least two hundred and fifty millions — all of them, on an average, far better educated than at the present moment, and all readers of books.” We are willing to allow an enormous increase in the present ratio of readers to non- readers, as compared with the ratio of 1830; but if the latter be taken as one to five hundred, the former can hardly be taken as larger than twenty-five to five hundred. The sort of arithmetic wherewith Sir Walter seeks to enhance the opportunities of the Lit- erary Life of the present day must be illus- trated more specifically. We are willing to be liberal, and to accept, for example, the conclu- sions of the following sentence: “Sixty years ago there was no Chicago at all: now there is a city with two million inhabitants, of whom one-half are decently educated and read books, and quite one hundred thousand are interested in new literature.” Observe, however, that this 1899.] THE IXIAL 145 is a ratio of only one to twenty, as compared with the author's ratio for 1830, and is a very different thing from the claim that nearly everybody belongs to the audience upon which a new writer can count. This is simply an appeal from Philip drunk with optimism to Philip sober in the presence of facts. But we cannot find much sobriety in the author's no- tions of the number of readers to be reckoned for each individual copy of a book or periodical. He actually counts an average of twenty readers for every copy of a magazine and five hundred for every copy of a book. To say that these estimates are wild is to use moderate language. One of the most popular of our American monthlies some years ago claimed a million readers on the strength of an average circu- lation of two hundred thousand copies. We thought this claim of five readers to a copy excessive, and the publishers obviously went as far as they dared in making it. But Sir Walter would give them four millions of readers instead of a poor single million. As for the five hun- dred readers that Sir Walter counts for each copy of a popular novel, we must insist upon a discount of at least ninety-five per cent. Twenty-five readers would be a generous esti- mate, and we doubt if a circulating-library copy ever got up to the five hundred mark. Most books would be in tatters after going through the hands of one hundred, or at the most two hundred, readers. It is evident that the above remarks are not to be taken as a review of “The Pen and the Book.” Indeed, we have not touched upon its main contents, which embody an elaborate setting-forth of the commercial aspect of author- ship, although we may take up this subject in the near future. As a champion of the writer in his relations with the publisher, Sir Walter has been a stout fighter for many years past, and in this book he presents the results of a thorough, practical investigation of the methods of publishing and the cost of producing books. He has made many enemies by his work in this field, and his assertions have occasioned a great deal of acrimonious debate. We have read a considerable quantity of this controversial mat- ter, and are bound to say that Sir Walter is armed cap-a-pie to meet his assailants, and that he usually has the best of the argument. We also wish to say that writers inexperienced in deal- ing with publishers will find profitable reading in “The Pen and the Book,” to say nothing of the pleasure to be got from its skilful literary pre- sentation of a subject of much general interest. LITERARY STANDARDS. When and where is to appear the true Prophet of the Literati, - he who is to stand and cry, Behold the ideal taste, the perfect writer, the Ultimate Authority | We hear much about the “best literary taste,” and the conscientious toilers of the pen, those who have not yet reached the comfortable conclu- sion that they know it all, spend many an anxious hour in self-examination, more or less illuminated by the feeble “glims” of favorable or adverse critics. What a help and comfort it would seem to be, alike to writers, readers, and publishers, if some literary Mahomet might arise to declare with con- vincing power, “There is but one Standard, and I am its Prophet !” Then all of us — or at least all afflicted with a conscience — might give o'er the weary search for the ideal, for we would know just what to write about and how ; and readers who valued their mental and moral status would know just what to read; and the world's shelves would groan no more under the load of books which infal- lible publishers have brought to an ill-conceived birth. But would we? Even though a literary angel should come from Heaven with unimpeachable cre- dentials, would it make any appreciable difference? Would the number of false and foolish books be seriously diminished? Would the millions leave off soddening their none too nimble wits in a steep of sickly sentiment and vapid thought? I fear not. And yet every writer who has high ideals, and has, besides, the saving grace to feel dissatisfied with his own accomplishment, has moments when he longs for one clear, sure voice amid the cackle of conflicting criticism, one bright, fixed polestar in the uncertain sky. He has tasted the “classics,” only to be more fully persuaded how wisely and wittily Mark Twain has described them. He sam- ples modern models, only to find many men, many minds. Each author has his constituency of ad- mirers; to others he is either indifferent or alto- gether anathema. One is too psychological, another is all “fight and love” stories; one is naughty with- out being nice, another too nice to be either naughty or interesting; here one discusses “problems,” there it is a problem that he is discussing; this one ser- monizes, that scandalizes; one is too smart, another too simple; this one buries his little grain of thought in a bushel of verbiage, that one sends forth the children of his brain too scantily clothed for de- cency; alike in the dense air of realism and in the rarified air of hyper-idealism we gasp for breath: and so it goes. In such a state of things, what is the writer and reader to do who is ambitious to improve his style and cultivate his taste: is he to go with the crowd, calling all things good which others call good, or is he to lay himself open to the charge of conceit and presumption by daring to exercise his independent judgment, even of the Immortals? Is it all a delu- sion, anyhow, this talk about higher and lower 146 THE DIAL [March 1, taste, – the distinction being as valid as that well- known difference between orthodoxy and hetero- doxy? If there is no absolute standard, how shall one taste be higher or another lower P Perhaps, after all, it is only a matter of time, circumstance,— and luck. - Worse yet, the past sheds no light on the present or the future. The books which delighted the fathers excite in us either distaste or the very gentle interest of the “classicist.” Books change and we change with them; but is it up or down? In short, is there any real literary evolution? There is but one way out of this fog of other people's tastes and opinions: to see that our ques- tion is only one phase of a much larger one. That question is world-wide and world-old: Pontius Pilate was not the first to ask it; it knows no bounds of time or space. The whole literary, moral, and social order, nay, even the universe itself, ravels out into a pitiful reductio ad absurdum unless we assume the existence of an Absolute Standard of truth and beauty. This is a necessity, not of reli- gion only, but of sanity as well. A second postulate is equally imperative: the soul of man is made in the image of that Standard, and its normal growth is along the lines of eternal verities. These two postulates being granted, things begin to clear up. Now we are less anxious to know what A, B, and C think of the thoughts we have written, than to know they are true. Now we can go on bravely and hopefully, our only concern being the normal development of that germ of the Infinite within us. Now we know that all distortions of truth, all affectations of beauty, being violations of eternal laws, must come to naught; whatever vogue they may have at first, they are ephemerae. But the path, though clearer, is still far from easy. Eternal vigilance is the price of sanity. The beginnings of error are as infinitesimally insidious as the microscopic germs which infect the body; and the mind has a fatal facility for repeating an error once begun, until it becomes a bias, then a habit, and finally a characteristic. Life is a Sisy- phean task of sifting and weighing, of making errors and correcting them, but ever “approximat- ing nearer and nearer to the limit of the variable,” as the mathematicians say. That limit is Perfect Judgment. That is the goal and rest of all this fitful fever. In all this struggle to approximate the truth, of course the wise will not neglect the help to be derived from others’ taste and judgment; but once the evi- dence on any point is all before us, it is ourselves who must decide. Of course we shall make mistakes,— that, all are bound to do in any case; but better sometimes wrong than always servile. Let us go forward bravely, in the full assurance that the laws of our being are the laws of Infinite Right. But there is one essential condition, without it there is no progress and no sanity: we must be abso- butely honest with ourselves. How can he know truth who lies even to his own soul! He (or she) who, for love of gain or fame, cajoles himself to believe that wrong is right; who, for pride or con- ceit of opinion, will not allow himself to see his error; who twists the truth to fit a story or a theory; who from love of ease seeks not to know the truth, or stifles it for fear of others' criticism, -none such need ever hope for perfect judgment or perfect taste. Truth is the oxygen of the soul. While they im- agine they are clever, they are fools, for they are asphyxiating their own souls to an eternal death. But would not the subjection of all literature to the test of truth be a long step backward, reducing us to sermons and scientific theses? By no means,—even granting that sermons and theses are invariably ves- sels of truth. Broadly speaking, all literature which makes for the betterment of man, either directly, or indirectly through saneful wit and humor, is true literature. It need not be professedly moral, but its influence must not be immoral. To that extent, Tolstoi is right. All literature which presents ideas with which the facts do not agree; which excites silly, morbid, or vulgar feelings and aspirations; which makes a jest of that which is sacred, shame- ful, or revolting; which vulgarizes by too great familiarity with vulgarity; which makes the wrong appear the better reason; which apotheosizes vice or calls buffoonery humor, – all such literature, of infinite variety of shade and grade, is either dis- tinctly vicious or at best is trashy. No wonder that such fatal and fantastic notions of life and happi- ness shock the world by working out their logical and inevitable conclusions in crime and suicide from the flood of trash literature continually poured forth, even through our public libraries, to glut the morbid appetite of those least able to discriminate. But is there any best literary style? The best style is any style which best subserves the ends of true literature. It is a mistake to take for granted that there is no longer room for originality in style, treatment, or subject. Well worked though the field now seems to be, there are doubtless undiscov- ered tracts of virgin soil only awaiting the pioneer pen to laugh back with as rich a harvest, as has ever yet been seen. To the fathers, who found per- fect satisfaction in “Rasselas ”or “The Vicar of Wakefield,” it doubtless seemed that the Ultima Thule of popular literature had been reached; now those literary superlatives are relegated to the dig- nified and dubious limbo of “classics.” The varia- tions of the written thought, as of all things human, are the variations of the human soul; and they are infinite. Three examples out of many illustrate this point of originality: Carlyle, Emerson, Kipling. Each had an independent mind, which, boldly desert- ing the trodden paths, struck out for itself into the woods an original line of thought and style. At first the world, always shy of truth in unaccustomed guise, refused to follow; now it hails them gladly to Parnassus. But these were geniuses. Verily; yet we who, 1899.] THE DIAL 147 alas, are only common clay, may profit by their ex- ample. We too are free to try new paths in style and subject; perchance even we can find something to write about fresher than the worn-to-death rela- tion of the sexes, and tell it in a best way of our own devising. Mr. Stephen Crane made the attempt gallantly enough, but only half-successfully. His well-praised, well-execrated little book holds a few gems of expression which glisten like diamonds in a dreary waste of sand. Mr. Crane's psychology is positively painful; but in “The Red Badge of Courage” he really struck a new lead in flashlight word-pictures which is worth developing; some day the man or woman is coming who will do it, if he does not. Poets are born, publishers are made: writers must be both born and made. None need lose heart, for none can say what is in him until he has done his best. But right here is the danger point. That Best is no Jonah's gourd, but a plant of slowest growth, fed by thought, study, and experience,— mayhap watered by tears and watched with care, only to bloom as the westering shadows lengthen. But whether or no it bloom in this world is a minor matter; the great matter is, Have we written our- selves down as a part of the Truth and the Beauty which are Eternal? “Let each paint the thing as he sees it, for the God of things as they are.” R. W. ConANT. COMMUNICATIONS. SCHOOL LEGISLATION FOR LARGE CITIES AND SMALL. (To the Editor of THE DIAL.) Recent and current school legislation for cities is rightfully attracting attention. With the illustration of the Cleveland law and its six years of trial, sufficient evidence is presented of the efficacy of at least some of the changes thereby accomplished. The discussion and presentation of the subject so far contemplates and provides for the conduct of schools in large cities only. The measures presented by the Chicago Commission, also of the Detroit Committee, are quite similar. In a general way, the belief that they suggest needed reforms is generally accepted. For the thirty cities in the country reported by the Commissioner of Education as exceeding one hundred thousand population, the propo- sition stated must be accepted as pointing to a more efficient school administration. Provision for these thirty cities, if applicable to them alone, leaves nearly six hundred other cities with a population exceeding eight thousand, the schools of which are all at least of equal importance to the country with those of these great cities. It will be found that the two chief features of the proposed reform are: first, the divorce of the board of education from executive duty, and confining it to leg- islation; second, the placing of the direct personal responsibility where a strict account for acts can be de- manded and easily given. While it is possible that the framers of the proposed legislation have in mind primarily, as the Chicago Com- mission announces, that organization which shall be best for a given city, it will be found that a city which for any reason is unable to provide and maintain two dis- tinct departments in administration — namely, business and educational—if the board confine itself to legisla- tion, can unite the two under one executive officer. The superintendent of schools in smaller cities is able, or should be able, to execute not only efficiently on the educational side but also on the business side. Observa- tions of several smaller cities in the country illustrate that where this has been the practice for a series of years the schools have been accorded a measure of reputable standing. While modifications will be de- manded of the Detroit, St. Louis, or Chicago plan, for cities of fifty thousand people, they will be slight; but the erection of divers departments in other than large cities will bring embarrassment financially, and ulti- mately an unsatisfactory outcome. As Dr. Hinsdale said in your last issue, it may be that no single type of system will follow the present interest in this subject. To my mind it is reasonably certain that a general type of management of schools in cities will be found to existere long, not only in the thirty great cities of more than one hundred thousand people, but also in the cities of less size. It is not so great a misfortune that thought and study has been exclusively for the great communities; but, after all, if a commission similar to the Chicago Commission should undertake to formulate a plan for cities in the neighborhood of fifty thousand people, more communities would be directly benefitted than at present. AARON Gove. Denver, Colo., Feb. 20, 1899. THE RENAISSANCES IN JAPAN. (To the Editor of THE DIAL.) It is a trite but none the less true saying, that “his- tory repeats itself.” The capture of Constantinople by the Turks in the fifteenth century scattered the learned men of the East and their learning over the West, and produced throughout Europe a Renaissance whose vast influence has never yet been accurately measured, and which was undoubtedly one of the chief elements in modern civilization. Again, it was Tartar hordes, which, about two hundred years later, overthrew the reigning native dynasty of China, and unwittingly produced in the neighboring land of Japan a Renaissance which led ultimately to the Restoration of 1868, and was evidently one of the chief elements in the civilization of New Japan. For, as the Greek scholars, fleeing from Con- stantinople, took refuge in various countries of Europe, likewise many patriotic Chinese scholars fled from their native land and took refuge in Japan. Or, as the fugi- tive Greek savants stirred up throughout Western Eu- rope a revival of learning, in like manner the fugitive Chinese scholars aroused in Japan a deeper interest in Oriental learning. The influence exerted in Japan by the learned Chi- nese refugees, especially by one named Shu Shun-sui, was considerable. This one man was in 1665 invited by Mitsukuni, the famous Prince of Mito, to take up his abode with that clan. The Mito Prince was at the time engaged in the preparation of the “Dai Nihon Shi,” or “Great Japanese History,” which “had so powerful an influence in forming the public opinion which now up- 1 holds the Mikado's throne”; and he invited the assist- ance of at least one of these Chinese scholars in correcting this work, which was written in Chinese. And although there is no positive evidence that this assistance extended 148 THE DIAL [March 1, beyond textual correction, yet it is not at all improbable that even this slight opportunity was utilized for teach- ing loyalty to the central authority. But, besides the direct and indirect literary work of these learned refugees, we must not lose sight of the deeper interest which, by their very presence, was nat- urally aroused in the study of Chinese literature and philosophy. It is, of course, a difficult matter to trace clearly the extent of such influence; but it is generally admitted by those who have studied the subject, that the presence of Chinese literati in Japan did give a greater impetus to learning. It is, indeed, true that the revival of learning had, before their arrival, begun un- der the auspices of Iyeyasu himself, who, after he had conquered a peace, reorganized the Empire on the fuedal basis, and practically settled upon the policy of seclu- sion and crystallization, “determined also to become the architect of the national culture.” He encouraged study, especially of the Chinese classics, and stimulated education. It is, therefore, no wonder that the Chinese savants received a warm welcome; and it seems, under the circumstances, as if they had “come to the king- dom for such a time as this.” But this Renaissance had a still wider influence, which extended even to political affairs. There were, in fact, three lines along which the Japanese were gradually led back to Imperialism. One line was Confucianism, which taught loyalty; another was historical research, which exhibited the Shogun as a usurper; and a third was the revival of Pure Shinto, which accompanied or followed the second. But the Japanese so modified Chinese Confucianism as to substitute loyalty for filial duty as the most important element. “The Shinto and the Chinese teachings became amalgamated in a common cause, and thus the philosophy of Chu Hi, mingling with the nationalism and patriotism inculcated by Shinto, brought about a remarkable result.” To change slightly the figure used above, the Japanese were led over three roads from Feudalism to Imperialism. There was the broad and straight highway of historical research: on the right side, generally parallel with the main road, and often running into it, was the path of Shinto; on the opposite side, making frequently a wide detour to the left, was the road of Confucianism; but eventually all these roads led to Kyoto and the Emperor. It seems as if, with the aid of Chinese savants, the famous Mito Prince, Mitsukuni, the “Japanese Maece- nas,” a scholar himself and the patron of scholars, set on foot a Renaissance in literature, learning, and poli- tics, and has been appropriately styled “the real author of the movement which culminated in the Revolution of 1868.” And the effects of this Renaissance are still being felt in another Revival of Learning, this time along Occidental lines. To what will this new Revival lead 7 ERNEST W. CLEMENT. Tokyo, Japan, Feb. 1, 1899. AN ENGLISH VERSION OF * BARBARA FREITCHIE.” (To the Editor of THE DIAL.) In his admirable work on “Stonewall Jackson and the American Civil War,” the author, Colonel Hender- son, says of his hero: “So general was the belief in his stern and merciless nature, that a great poet did not hesitate to link his name with a deed which, had it actu- ally occurred, would have been one of unexampled cruelty. Such calumnies as Whittier's ‘Barbara Frit- chie,” etc. (Vol. I, p. 80.) The point is not important—but one wonders where the “calumny” is in Whittier's poem, or what sort of a version of it circulates in England. The poem merely says that when Jackson rode up the street of Frederick City at the head of his troops, and “the old flag met his sight,” he ordered his men to blaze away at it, which they did; but later, when the owner of the flag, Dame Barbara, appeared on the scene and snatched the fallen flag, and leaned far out o'er the window-sill and shook it forth with a royal will, Jackson announced that any- one who touched a hair of her gray head should die like a dog, or words to that effect. The facts on which the poem is based have been dis- puted, and the whole thing is perhaps a little apochry- phal; but it is hard to see where the “unexampled cruelty” would come in, were everything actually true that is stated in the poem. J. G. M. Cleveland, Ohio, Feb. 24, 1899. “DEATH TO THE SPANISH YOKE.” (To the Editor of THE DIAL.) Apropos of the various discussions of war poems that have appeared in THE DIAL, I would like to call your attention to one which has no greater defects than many which have been exploited as the war poems of the cen- tury. Its publication was anonymous. The verses contain, at least, elements of what Stev- enson calls “the fervid participation of the moment.” Whether they exhibit any marked poetic talent, the reader may judge for himself. ALEXANDER JESSUP. Westfield, Mass., Feb. 16, 1899. [Our correspondent's letter makes us anxious to have it understood that the discussions, and not the war poems, are what have appeared in THE DIAL. We print this war poem, however, and with it the lines from which it is clumsily and impudently cribbed, in order that “the reader may judge for himself” as to its “poetic talent,” and especially its quality of “fervid participation of the moment” which our correspondent discerns in it. It is a hard thing to say of our Jingo poetry, that this is no worse than most of it; but we fear it is true. We do not wonder it was published anonymously.—EDR. DIAL.] American Jingo poet. Where shall the Spaniards rest, Whom our shots sever, From all that life holds best Parted forever? Where our shots thickly fly, Death is their pillow, As all true Spaniards die, Under the billow. There on Manila bay Cool waters are laving, There on the crested spray Our shots are paving Death to the Spanish yoke, Parted forever, Never again to wake, Never, oh never! Her wings shall the sea-bird flap O'er the false-hearted, Their * blood the waves shall ap Ere life be parted; Shame and dishonor sit By their side ever, Victory shall hallow it Never, oh never! sir WALTER scort. Where shall the lover rest, Whom the fates sever, From his true maiden's breast Parted forever? Where thro' groves deep and high Sounds the far billow, Where early violets die Under the willow. There through the Summer day Cool streams are laving; There while the tempests sway Scarce are boughs waving; There thou thy rest shall take Parted forever, Never again to wake, Never, oh never ! Her wing shall the eagle flap O'er the false-hearted, His * blood the wolf shall ap Ere life be parted; Shame and dishonor sit By his grave ever, Blessing shall hallow it Never, oh never! * 1899.] THE TXIAL 149 Čbe #tto $ochs. THE MEMORIALs of LORD SELBORNE.* The concluding instalment, in two sizable volumes, of the late Earl of Selborne’s “Me- morials” is mainly a restatement of the author's views on the major public questions which arose during the period covered (1865–1895), and an explanation of his professional and official courseregarding them. Some of the chapters are rather freely diluted with matter that will inter- est Lord Selborne's relatives and closer friends rather than the public at large; but the volumes on the whole may safely be pronounced solid and informing, if not especially animated or graphic, additions to the large and growing stock of reminiscences of Victorian times. Lord Sel- borne's gifts and temperament were hardly such as to qualify him to shine as a writer of memoirs of the lighter personal and reminiscential order, a species of writing in which many a social trifler equipped with a lively pen and a taste for gossip might easily have excelled him. Of chat about notable contemporaries, therefore, the volumes will seem to many readers to con- tain disappointingly little. That Lord Selborne, where the subject was an imposing one and where his sympathies were deeply engaged, was no mean hand at painting a portrait and defining a character, his strong and refreshingly independent characterization of Gladstone conclusively shows. Now that Mr. Lecky has, in a recent preface, calmly pro- nounced “the texture of Mr. Gladstone's intel- lect” to have been of the “commonplace” order, we may confidently look to see the inev- itable reactionary tide of disparagement of the Grand Old Man of liberalism and parliament- ary manoeuvre fairly set in. Much evil has of course been spoken of Mr. Gladstone in the past by his political foes, who, not content with attacking his policy, have impugned his motives, and even attempted to injure his character by the foulest aspersions. But detraction of that sort is politics, not criticism; and we suspect that the recent verdict of Mr. Lecky himself regarding the quality of Mr. Gladstone's intel- lect is tinged by his known opinion of the quality of Mr. Gladstone's measures, more especially his Irish agrarian measures; for it is difficult for even a philosopher to admit that a *MEMORIALs, PERsonAL AND PoliticAL, 1865–1895. By Roundell Palmer, Earl of Selborne. In two volumes. With portraits, New York: The Macmillan Co. fruit he happens to personally dislike can spring from any but an inferior and weakly tree. Lord Selborne disagreed pretty sharply with Mr. Gladstone on some points, almost from the first years of their connection; and he was very far from keeping pace with his early oracle and paragon in the latter's dramatic yet gradual and deliberate advance from the one extreme to the other of British opinion. This advance (the term is perhaps open to criticism as a question-begging one) Lord Selborne, who had himself gathered caution and conservatism with ripening years in the usual and normal way, must have inwardly regarded as a sort of intel- lectual and political Rake's Progress on the part of the once “rising hope” of all that was venerable and established in England. Nor does he refrain from using language of some bitterness when he comes to speak of the clos- ing phase of Mr. Gladstone's career. If it be true, says Lord Selborne, that down to the end of June, 1886, Gladstone “kept the great con- troversy on the heights,” it was certainly not long afterwards that he ceased to do so, his power of self-persuasion affecting his moral judgments in a way that would have been deemed impossible in earlier years. In the con- stant stress and turmoil of electioneering since 1886, in which he played the leading part, there was little to remind men of the Gladstone of old, save the old eloquence, energy, and daunt- less courage, qualities more remarkable than ever when displayed by the man past eighty. “A new “transmigration of spirit” came over him; he accepted it with as much alacrity and apparent self- satisfaction as if it had always been so; he invested it with the authority of his age, his name, his character; and under its influence the statesman was transformed into the demagogue. Mr. Parnell became, for four years, until he himself broke the spell, the special object of his admiration; and other violent spirits of the ‘League' were glorified as heroes and martyrs. . . . He became the apologist of the methods by which his new allies carried on their warfare against landlords and the law in Ireland. . . . All sorts of schemes for parliament- ary interference with rights of property, and with the freedom of capital and labor, budded and blos- somed under the capacious shelter of the new Liberal “umbrella,” not without a sanguine hope that, in the good time coming, they would be entertained by the great leader “with an open mind': and there was no ‘plain speaking’ to discourage that hope. What the final issue of these things may be, cannot be foretold; but if it should be the decay and degradation of British states- manship, and the triumph of anarchical forces, hostile to the life of freedom, “while they shout her name,” Mr. Gladstone will have contributed to it more than any other man.” Searching history for a parallel to Mr. Glad- stone's peculiarities as a statesman, Lord Sel- 150 [March 1, THE DIAL borne hits, not infelicitously, upon the Emperor Joseph II., as drawn by Mr. Lecky. “Ambitious, fond of power, and at the same time restless and impatient, his mind was to the highest de- gree susceptible to the political ideas that were floating through the intellectual atmosphere of Europe; and he was an inveterate dreamer of dreams. Large, compre- hensive, and startling schemes of policy, — radical changes in institutions, manners, tendencies, habits, and traditions,— had for him an irresistible fascination.” Impatient of opposition to his opinion of the moment, Mr. Gladstone's opinions were in a constant and continuous state of flux and de- composition. His view of any given question of importance was changing, even while he was maintaining it with the zeal and apparent con- viction of a prophet. “With great appearance of tenacity at any given moment, his mind was apt to be moving indirectly down an inclined plane.” Mr. Gladstone could be quoted against Mr. Gladstone on almost any leading or funda- mental public question whatever. To find a powerful and convincing plea against what Mr. Gladstone was urging to-day, you had only to turn back to what Mr. Gladstone was urging yesterday. Agrarian schemes that yesterday were stigmatized as “rapine” and “plunder” were extenuated and even justified to-day as quite excusable and useful moves in a patriotic Plan of Campaign. “Boycotting,” that in 1882 was denounced as “combined intimida- tion, made use of for the purpose of destroying private liberty of choice by fear of starvation, —inflicting ruin, and driving men to do what they did not want to do, and preventing them from doing what they had a right to do,” be- came, after 1886, under the magic of Mr. Glad- stone's faculty of self-persuasion and matchless dialectic, mere “exclusive dealing,” or a form of trades-unionism that was “the only available weapon for the Irish people, in their weakness and poverty, against the wealthy and powerful.” It would be easy to go on quoting from the tale of Mr. Gladstone's thousand and one “magnificent inconsistencies” (as his hardier admirers called them) in proof of the, to our thinking, not very damaging fact that the au- thor of them was as different as could be from the more common type of man who goes through life a complacent slave to the faith he was born in. But Lord Selborne's strictures clearly go deeper than the charge of mere inconsistency. If we are to accept his view unreservedly (which we do not), Mr. Gladstone became in his later years of political activity “a demagogue,” an inflamer of popular animosities, of class hatreds and class cupidities, – all this for the sake of personal popularity and party advan- tage. He degenerated into a sort of “Sand Lots” haranguer of genius, the more dangerous because of his genius. He was not honest, either with himself or with others. “He had a wonderful power of not seeing what he did not like. He was a master of the art of throwing dust into the eyes of those who were proper subjects for that operation; and he could practise it not less skil- fully upon himself.” Let us turn for a moment to the lights of Lord Selborne's by no means altogether or intention- ally disparaging portrait of his former chief. The secret of Mr. Gladstone's great popularity he finds in the opinion generally entertained of the purity of his motives, the elevation of his character, in his sympathy with the people and desire for their good, rather than in his energy, eloquence, and intellectual gifts. Humanity turned to him naturally, as to a friend, as to one who felt more than other men of like gifts and station the common kinship of all. “His private life was indeed without a flaw. . . . He preferred misconstruction to missing opportunities of doing good. . . . His interests were wide and cosmo- politan; his acquirements were multifarious, and all at his command. He was a lover of music, poetry, the drama, and the fine arts. . . . He spoke more than one European language almost as easily as his own. He was very high, if not first, in the first rank of modern orators;—an orator of the diffuse florid kind, Ciceronian rather than Demosthenic, lofty when dignity was neces- sary, and at all times fluent and animated; abounding in illustration and metaphor; every word in the right place, every sentence well turned.” American readers will be particularly inter- ested in Lord Selborne's account of the “Alabama’” arbitration. He was consulted professionally by his government during the negotiations prior to the Treaty of Washington, and he acted as counsel for Great Britain be- fore the Geneva Tribunal. The maltreatment of this country by the British authorities dur- ing the Civil War, in the matter of the Con- federate privateers, is now res adjudicata and admitted and deplored matter of history. But Lord Selborne, with an advocate's obstinacy, still endeavors to put America in the wrong. If we won our case at Geneva it was mainly through our bluster and chicane, through the bias of arbitrators, through the generous for- bearance of Great Britian, – that is the spirit of his contention. He intimates that our nego- tiators at the outset felt the importance of “either complicating the question by irrelevant issues, or to some extent prejudicing it by the terms of reference.” He hints darkly at the “wiles and subtleties” of the American law- 1899.] THE DIAL 151 yers, at the “loaded dice” with which America was allowed by the Rules to “play the game of hazard.” With a wooden insensibility to the essential fact that in the eyes of America the trial at Geneva was symbolic, - that America stood at the bar of the Tribunal, not as a mere claimant of so many dollars and cents in a suit for damages, but to demand moral satisfaction and moral reparation in the sight of the world for a great wrong, — Lord Selborne sneers at the feeling injected into the American “Case.” Its tone, he complains, “was acrimonious, totally wanting in international courtesy.” Perhaps it was. Perhaps the American “Case” was es- sentially such that not to state it in strong language would be tantamount to not stating it at all. Perhaps a nation still smarting under the recollection of the jeers, contumely, and material damage inflicted upon it by a “neu- tral” power, while its own hands were tied by civil war, was justified in revealing a sense of wrong even in a formal statement of its griev- ances. The question is often asked, “Why does America dislike England?” and ingenious ex- planations are offered. But there is a plain and sufficient answer to that question, and that is, “Because England has shown in the past so often and so offensively that she disliked America.” She never showed it so conclusively as during our Civil War, when our difficulties absolved her from the immediate need of cau- tion. The “Alabama’’ incident was but a flagrant episode in the painful story of the atti- tude toward us of the British Government and the British cultured and influential classes dur- ing that period. Russia alone stood our friend, our friend in need; and to forget that now would be the blackest ingratitude. What was the “Alabama”? Let us answer that question in the words of a distinguished Englishman, Mr. W. E. Forster, the friend and colleague of John Bright, who stood the eloquent champion of the North, while Mr. Gladstone was complacently proclaiming that Jefferson Davis “had made an army, had made a navy, and, more than that, had made a na- tion.” Said Mr. Forster: “The ‘Alabama’ was a British ship, built by British ship-builders, and manned by a British crew; she lured prizes to destruction under a British flag, and was paid for by money borrowed from British cap- italists.” All the logic-chopping and learned technicalities of Lord Selborne at Geneva could not obscure those facts. During her two-years cruise the “Alabama” took some seventy North- ern vessels, and literally drove our commerce from the seas. As an English historian says: “She went upon her destroying course with the cheers of English sympathizers and the rapturous tirades of English newspapers glorifying her. Every misfortune that befell an American merchantman was received in this country with a roar of delight.” Let us add that when the “Alabama,” in her first encounter with an antagonist of any- thing like her own class and armament, was shot to pieces after a brief engagement, her fate was mourned sincerely and patriotically by a chagrined British public. It was the last action between a British and an American vessel. The student of the questions of church and law reform dealt with in these concluding vol- umes will find Lord Selborne's reflections thereon of no little value. The correspondence with which the work is freely interspersed is of fair interest, and the author's occasional devia- tions from the dignified, if somewhat diffuse, exposition of his own political views into the lighter paths of reminiscence will be welcomed by the average reader. The editing has been conscientiously done by Lady Sophia Palmer, Lord Selborne's daughter and literary trustee. The volumes are notably well made and con- tain several portraits. E. G. J. THE SECOND YEAR OF THE CIVIL WAR.” Mr. Ropes is giving to the world what seems likely to be the standard history of our great Civil War. As we took occasion to say when his first volume appeared, he approaches his work in the spirit of a historian and not as an advocate of any general or any policy. Now that a third of a century has elapsed since the close of the war, the leading actors have all passed off the stage, and the country has en- tered upon a new era of its history, there seems to be no reason why a really impartial and authoritative narrative of that period cannot be written; and there is much to warrant the opinion that Mr. Ropes has produced that nar- rative in its broad lines and its general judg- ments of individuals and of movements and campaigns. The volume opens with the startling victory at Forts Henry and Donelson, which broke the Confederate line and recovered Kentucky and Tennessee for the Union. The incapacity of *THE STORY OF THE Civil WAR. By John Codman Ropes. Volume II. The Campaigns of 1862. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons. 152 THE DIAL [March 1, General Halleck is shown at the outset, and continuously through the whole volume. It becomes clear that he undertook this campaign recklessly, without the knowledge of his supe- riors and without the coöperation of his asso- ciate commanders in the West. Mr. Ropes asserts that Halleck “had no scheme in his mind,” and that jealousy was a probable mo- tive of his precipitate action. The administra- tion was planning a campaign in East Tennes- see; Halleck was afraid that his command would be absorbed in that of Buell, so he plunged into his campaign and compelled the government to follow his lead. It was probably the wisest move he could make; but the man- ner of making it, and the way in which it was followed up, deserve the severest censure. The next step shows the “great reckless- ness” of General Grant at Pittsburg Landing. It was known to him and to his superior officer, General Halleck, that the enemy was near in great force; yet the army was retained in an exceedingly faulty position, with no outposts, no preparation to receive the enemy, no line of battle or defense. The various camps were established without system or plan of coöpera- tion. “All the well-known maxims of war applicable to such a position were absolutely unheeded by General Grant. Probably there never was an army encamped in an enemy's country with so little regard to the manifest risks which are inseparable from such a situa- tion.” The Union generals estimated the ene- my's forces at eighty thousand, against forty thousand of their own forces; yet they were blissfully unexpectant of an attack, and when it came it was a complete surprise. Grant was not on the field for several hours after the en- gagement opened, and even after he came every general acted for and by himself. He is de- clared to have been at that time “incapable of assuming the entire control and direction of a great battle,” and “not equal to an emergency of this magnitude.” The opportune arrival of Buell's troops enabled Grant to win a great victory the second day; but then came his lamentable failure to follow up and destroy the demoralized enemy. There was no reason why he should not have done so, but “he utterly failed to seize the opportunity,” “he entirely failed to rise to the height of this occasion.” If he had done what he might have done, the Confederacy would have been irretrievably weakened by the annihilation of one of its two great armies. Evidently, Grant had not yet found himself. We cannot follow the interesting discussion of the several campaigns of the eventful year of 1862, and must content ourselves with stat- ing a few of Mr. Ropes's judgments of men and events. It is interesting to contrast his estimates of the leading Federal generals with those of the enemy. Those of the North, with the simple exception of Buell, are shown to have been failures more or less complete. Hal- leck, McClellan, Pope, and Burnside make a poor showing beside A. S. Johnston, J. E. Johnston, and Lee. The appointment of Hal- leck, though the natural one at the time, was as bad as could have been made. He was without insight to detect the crisis of a campaign, or energy to strike when the moment of advan- tage came. He is shown, in this impartial nar- rative, as a weak man, self-confident, greedy of power, ready to assume responsibility, unwill- ing to coöperate generously with his associates, guilty of disastrous blunders. He was not a soldier by temperament or ability, though he had written a highly esteemed.book on the art of war and was accounted an authority on mili- tary questions. In his discussion of General McClellan and the famous Peninsular Campaign, Mr. Ropes is much less harsh than most writers, though the General's weaknesses are plainly indicated. His constitutional slowness, his excessive cau- tion, his inability to estimate his enemy's power and his consequent failure to take advantage of his opportunities to strike a fatal blow, - all these well-known defects are clearly shown. But his skill as a tactician and organizer, and as a leader of men, are also set forth; and though his career as a whole is shown to be a failure, and his defects the cause of the loss of many thousands of lives and of the prolonga- tion of the war, the reader feels that full jus- tice has been done him. He, too, had oppor- tunities, during this eventful year, to inflict a fatal blow upon the enemy; but he failed to use these opportunities, and hundreds of thou- sands of lives were the penalty of his incompe- tency. As for Pope and Burnside, there is no need of taking space to show that Mr. Ropes agrees with all other writers in declaring them almost absurdly incompetent for the high posi- tions to which they were appointed. So, while the administration was groping about for competent leaders for its armies, it was training them, at fearful cost, for future victories. Meanwhile, the civilians at the head of the government, having little confidence in their military agents, interfered and directed, 1899.] THE DIAL 153 and made the bad conditions worse. It is a sad story, but may as well be frankly told. The Confederates, on the other hand, were able to find at the outset competent leaders for their armies. These, too, made blunders, and many of them; but they were able men, and used the forces committed to them wisely and on the whole successfully. Of General Lee Mr. Ropes says: “In intellect it may be doubted whether he was supe- rior to the able soldier whom he succeeded; . . . but in that fortunate combination of qualities — physical, mental, and moral — which go to make up a great com- mander, General Lee was unquestionably more favored than any of the leaders of the Civil War. . . . Lee's position was unique; no army commander on either side was so universally believed in — so absolutely trusted. Nor was there ever a commander who better deserved the support of his government, and the affection and confidence of his soldiers.” Lee was undoubtedly reckless, astonishingly so, in his operations during this year, and gave many opportunities to his enemies. But he knew the calibre of the men opposed to him, and that he could take liberties with them which he could not have taken with competent generals; and the results justified his reckless boldness. He depended greatly, too, on his able subordinates, especially Stonewall Jack- son, who never but once failed him. A portfolio of excellent maps accompanies the volume. We shall look with interest for Mr. Ropes's next volume, which will deal with the stirring campaigns of Chancellorsville and Gettysburg in the East and Wicksburg in the West. CHARLEs H. CoopFR. THE FUNCTIONS AND REVENUES OF GOVERNMENT.” The word “finance” has been persistently used in English, both in everyday usage and to some extent even in the works of economic writers, as a general term referring rather indefinitely to the whole range of monetary and commercial affairs. But the Science of Finance, in the more correct sense in which Professor Adams uses the term, has to do only with pub- lic expenditures and public income, and the relations necessarily involved in their consid- eration; it “undertakes an analysis of the wants of the State and of the means by which those *THE SCIENCE of FINANCE. An Investigation of Public Expenditures and Public Revenues. By Henry Carter Adams, Ph.D., LL.D., Professor of Political Economy and Finance at the University of Michigan. (American Science Series— Advanced Course). New York: Henry Holt & Co. wants may be supplied.” Problems of money, currency, and banking, which have to do merely with the mechanism by which financial opera- tions are carried on, are not admitted to a place in the science; much less are questions of “private financiering,” such as have to do with the management of business corporations. It was natural enough that the same word should be popularly applied to the revenues of states and cities and to the funds of private corpora- tions, but this double use of the word has led to no little confusion. Nearly all writers on the Science of Finance devote comparatively little attention to expendi- tures, or else neglect that side of the subject altogether; and the result in either case is un- satisfactory. It would seem that public expendi- tures, considering the variety and importance of the objects for which they are incurred, might well receive even more attention than the man- ner of meeting them; but the science of public expenditures is as yet undeveloped, except as a mere introduction to the study of revenues. Professor Adams has, indeed, done not a little to develop it, first in his “Relation of the State to Industrial Action” and to some extent in his “Public Debts,” and now in his more comprehensive “Science of Finance.” He says that “the Science of Finance has no opinion respecting the question of the proper limit of public duties,” but his actual treatment of the subject is by no means so inadequate as this disclaimer might lead one to expect. A few passages by way of illustration: “It is futile to urge disarmament, and the consequent extinction of the military budget, so long as there con- tinues to be a conflict of legal ideas. . . . It is no acci- dent that the first approach to a successful tribunal for the arbitration of international disputes should rest upon negotiations for a treaty between England and the United States, for these peoples practise the same sys- tem of jurisprudence. Their theory of rights, and the method by which they aim to enforce those-rights, are the same. A standing international tribunal resting on agreement between England and Russia, however, or between the United States and China, is beyond the range of reasonable expectation at the present time; for it is only upon the basis of a common system of juris- prudence that a system of international law can be developed which shall render the preparation for war unnecessary.” “A local government may very properly enter upon a more comprehensive line of activities than the national government, since the more restricted the territory over which a government has jurisdiction, the greater likeli- hood will there be of community of interests among its citizens.” “It seems probable, when one regards the social evils wrought by corporations in certain industries of collec- tive interests, that local governments at least will ex- 154 THE DIAL [March 1, pand rather than contract the sphere of government administration.” “It is essential for the modern State to support pub- lic instruction, because there is no other way to guard against the fading of its own ideals through the rise of an aristocracy of learning. It is natural that institutions that look to the wealthy for further endowments should be influenced in their administration by the interests of the wealthy class; . . . and it requires no great insight to perceive that the final result of exclusive reliance upon private benefactions for any phase or grade of ed- ucation will be that the instruction provided will not only reflect the interests of a class, but will be confined to a class. . . . A State which aims to perpetuate de- mocracy cannot decline to make ample provision at public expense for all phases and forms of education. In no other way can a system of public instruction, which is by far the most potent agency in shaping civilization, be brought to the support of democracy.” Again, we are told that the normal law of public expenditures for the enforcement of fac- tory legislation, and for public commissions, is that such expenditures will continue to increase until industrial development has run its course, or until the character of government itself shall have been changed by some great upheaval; that governments must continually increase the amount of money at the disposal of their statis- tical service; that expenditures for forestry, irrigation, and public improvements for the ben- efit of commerce will also increase with the growth of society; but that, on the other hand, expenditures for the protective functions of the State, as distinguished from its developmental functions, tend to decrease in proportion as the protective service of the State succeeds. There is here at least the foundation of a science of public activities. Professor Adams rejects the statistical method of studying public expenditures, and confines himself to a theoretical discussion, because the former could not be satisfactorily applied, and because the latter is essential in any case. But besides the a priori method on the one hand and the purely statistical method on the other, there is the historical-comparative method, which is often applied to particular problems of public economy, and might be employed in developing the science as a whole. A theoret- ical treatment, even when so philosophical as that of Professor Adams, is not wholly satis- factory, because the considerations which de- termine governmental action are of an eminently practical nature, and may easily vary from place to place; while at the same time a merely statistical study would not be enough, chiefly because the more important results of govern- mental action are incapable of quantitative measurement. Neither political philosophy nor statistics, therefore, ought to be expected to determine what are the proper functions of government. The consideration of public revenues also involves a study of certain governmental activ- ities, which Professor Adams classifies into industries undertaken for the purpose of secur- ing revenue, those in which revenue is incidental to service, and those undertaken primarily for service; and for each class a distinct rule is given for the adjustment of charges. The main division of the work, however, is devoted to Taxation. Here, after elucidating the princi- ples, and approving progressive rates as being most in accordance with individual ability, the author devotes a chapter to “Suggestions for a Revenue System.” He would assign to the federal government the taxation of interstate commerce, in addition to the customs and ex- cise duties; to the States he would give taxes on the business of corporations, other than interstate commerce, and on inheritances; and to the local governments he would assign taxes on land, on professional incomes, on licenses, and on municipal franchises. The theoretical basis of this proposed arrangement is that each government should tax those industries with which it holds some fundamental or constitu- tional relation. Twelve years ago Professor Adams wrote that “one of the chief difficulties under which we in this country suffer, in our endeavors to solve the problem of monopolies, arises from the fact that our publicists and statesmen pro- ceed in profound ignorance of the meaning and purpose of the science of finance.” For that ignorance they have no longer any excuse. MAX WEST. TWO GREAT EVANGELISTS.* An evangelist, in a broad sense, is one with a gospel message who goes about rousing men to a higher and better life. Matthew Arnold was a literary evangelist, proclaiming every- where by word of voice and pen the gospel of literary culture. Henry Drummond, as is evi- dent from Dr. George Adam Smith's masterly biography, was above all else a Christian evan- gelist, filled with a glowing love, who stirred men of all circles and conditions, by voice and printed word. But Drummond's greatest work *THE LIFE of HENRY DRUMMond. By George Adam Smith. New York: Doubleday & McClure Co. NEwMAN HALL, AN AUTobiography. Illustrated. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell & Co. 1899.] THE DIAL 155 was with the educated classes, and particularly with college students; and the movements which he set on foot with them are still powerful and progressive. Drummond's sincerity, open- mindedness, intellectuality, and sympathy with science, made him the friend and helper of vast numbers whose religious life was being troubled by doubts suggested by science. The enormous success of his “Natural Law in the Spiritual World,” and of many of his Addresses, lay in his identifying Nature with Christianity, and showing the natural foundation of Christianity as a law of love. From whichever side we take Drummond's position, as either naturalistic Christianity or Christianized naturalism, it was a gospel of a reconciliation of science and relig- ion which appealed very powerfully to his read- ers and hearers. “To Henry Drummond, Christianity was the crown of the evolution of the whole universe. The drama which absorbed him is upon a stage infinitely wider than the moral life of man. The soul, in its battle against evil, in its service for Christ, is no accident or exception, thrown upon a world all hostile to its feeble spirit. But the forces it represents are the primal forces of the universe; the great laws which modern science has unveiled sweep- ing through life from the beginning work upon the side of the man who seeks the things that are above.” Professor Smith opens his work with a strong sketch of the man in his winning personality. “We watched him, our fellow-student and not yet twenty-three, surprised by a sudden and a fierce fame. Crowds of men and women in all the great cities of our land hung upon his lips, innumerable lives opened their secrets to him, and made him aware of his power over them. When his first book was published, he, being then thirty-three, found another world at his feet; the great of the land thronged him; his social opportunities were boundless; and he was urged by the chief states- man of our time to a political career. This was the kind of a trial which one has seen wither some of the finest characters, and distract others from the simplicity and resolution of their youth. He passed through it unscathed; it neither warped his spirit nor turned him from his accepted vocation as a teacher of religion. . . . There was a never a glimpse of a phylactery nor a smudge of unction about his religion. He was one of the purest, most unselfish, most reverent souls you ever knew, but you would not have called him a saint. The name he went by among younger men was “The Prince'; there was a distinction and a radiance upon him that compelled the title.” While Professor Smith cannot easily and nat- urally call a man who plays cricket and bil- liards and enjoys a good cigar a “saint,” yet he compares Drummond's influence to that of a mediaeval saint. He was the confessor of multitudes of men and women of all classes. “They brought him alike their mental and phys- ical troubles. Surest test of a man's love and holiness, they believed in his prayers as a remedy for their dis- eases and a sure mediation between their sinful souls and God. It is with a certain hesitation that one asserts so much as this, yet the evidence in his correspondence is indubitable; and as the members of some great churches are taught to direct their prayers to the fam- ous saints of Christendom, so, untaught and naturally, as we shall see, more than one have since his death found themselves praying to Henry Drummond.” Professor Smith traces and emphasizes Drum- mond's progress from the strict orthodoxy of his early life to his later more enlarged and liberal views by which his evangelism gained power with men of high education and thought. Evolutionary Science and Biblical Criticism came to have great weight with him, and he gave up verbal inspiration, and found in rev- elation an evolution. A clear account is given of Drummond's evangelism in Glasgow, with Moody and San- key, and among British, American, and Aus- tralian students. This book also includes letters and diaries of travel in America, Africa, and the new Hebrides. These are often bright and vivid, as in this African sketch: “At Zomba, on the Sabbath, we had a service for the natives—the real “Missionary Record 'kind of a thing; white men with Bibles under a spreading tree, sur- rounded by a thick crowd of naked natives. We sang hymns from a hymn-book in the native tongue to Scotch psalm-tunes, and then spoke through an interpreter. Unfortunately, the service was brought to rather an abrupt conclusion. I had just finished speaking when a tremendous shriek rose from the crowd, and the con- gregation dispersed in a panic in every direction. A hugh snake had fallen from the tree right into the thick of them. A bombshell could not have done its work faster, but no one was hurt, and the beast disappeared like magic beneath some logs. The snakes rarely do harm, and I have never heard of a serious case.” While we cannot say that this book is over- eulogistic, yet we miss the marks of common and weak humanity. Drummond does not ap- pear to have had a redeeming vice; we should have felt better satisfied to have known, say, that at least once in his life he got angry and swore profanely. Peter and Paul and all the saintly characters of Scripture have their fail- ings, but Drummond stands out in these pages as an admirable and perfect Crichton. But, after all, we are glad to believe that here is the highest type of Christian knight, sans peur et sans reproche, an ideal soul, earnest, tender, true, of noblest spirituality and deepest sincer- ity. But we cannot esteem Drummond a great man, nor yet that he attained his full stature and maturity. We feel that here was a prom- ising tree forced to too early and abundant fruitage, and so exhausted for the most mature and permanent work. Professor Smith has 156 [March 1, THE I) LAL certainly given us an able and interesting his- tory of an eager, high-wrought soul, plunged in the vortex of our later nineteenth century life, moved by most manifold currents, and yet attaining a most noble and useful life. Another great evangelist, who resembled Drummond in his power of Christian love, but was more narrow in his interests and straighter in his orthodoxy, was Newman Hall. We have from his pen a chatty and pleasant “Autobi- ography,” in which he seeks to keep out of “the track of ordinary religious memoirs” in not speaking exclusively of his public career and religious experience, but also speaking freely of himself in all his relations with the men of his time, and narrating incidents of all kinds. He tells a number of first-rate stories, two of which we must quote. At Ferriby, - “The old parish clerk one Sunday surprised the con- gregation by announcing, in his usual monotone, “Let us sing to the praise and glory of God, a psalm of my own composing — a psalm of my own composing!' . . . In a family of my church was a devoutly-behaved dog, which regularly occupied its accustomed seat at family prayers, and remained motionless till the “Amen” at the close. One day when I was conducting the service, I read the fifth chapter of the Revelation, and when I came to the fourteenth verse, “And the four beasts said Amen!’ the dog jumped from his chair and began bark- ing as usual, as if all were over. This was too much for the assembly’s gravity; host and hostess, servants and friends, could not prevent laughter blending with barking, and the service ended with the dog’s “Amen.’” Dr. Hall gives a chapter to Gladstone, which throws some light on that statesman's character. There is also interesting mention of his ac- quaintance with John Bright, Lord Shaftes- bury, Dean Stanley, Spurgeon, and others. Newman Hall's pastorates, both in Hull and London, were thoroughly evangelistic in their nature. It was at Hull that he composed the tract “Come to Jesus,” which has circulated by the million. During the Civil War, Dr. Hall was influential as a friend of the North, and his American evangelizing tours, of which he gives a sketch, will be recalled by many. The mild and gentle spirit, the fervid and simple piety, of the author pervades his book, which is of interest on many accounts, and has consid- erable value for the religious historian. HIRAM. M. STANLEY. Messrs. Houghton, Mifflin & Co. have put together into a bound volume the six pamphlets of the “River- side Literature Series” which constitute the “College Requirements in English for Careful Study” for the coming three years. Milton, Shakespeare, Addison, Burke, and Macaulay are the authors selected for this ingenious form of torture. TRAVEL IN MANY LANDS.* Arctic exploration has received a new impetus within the last decade. The ice-bound lands in the frigid zones have suddenly assumed a new import- ance. Sir Martin Conway's experiences in Spitz- bergen since the beginning of 1896 have done much to set us right in our estimate of that country. The results of his first adventures, in 1896, were em- bodied in his “First Crossing of Spitsbergen.” The present volume, “With Ski and Sledge over Arctic Glaciers,” is to be regarded as an appendix to that account. In company with Mr. E. J. Garwood, a geologist and photographer, and two Norwegians, this undaunted Englishman set out to investigate many of the tremendous glaciers, ice fjords, and lofty snow and ice mountains of this arctic land, four hundred miles north of North Cape, and unin- habited by any permanent population. To read the crisp account of their tramps over ice gorges and chasms, through blinding snowstorms, and on their ski, or snowshoes, is close akin to enjoying the same experiences. An expert's popular descrip- tion of the movements of a great glacier, and of its final crash into the waters of the bay, is a bit of exceedingly good reading. The important result of this brief two months' trip was the determination of the fact that Spitsbergen is not, as held by earlier explorers, covered with an ice-sheet. This term does not describe the condition of things in arctic lands, and should be expunged from the geograph- ical vocabulary. The so-called ice-sheets are merely glacial and mountain areas on either side of water- sheds tending toward the sea. Neither do glaciers excavate great valleys, as popularly held. The familiar, easy method of telling his story inspires confidence in the author's knowledge and his ability to arrive at sound conclusions. *WITH SK1 AND SLEDGE ovKR ARCTIC GLACIERs. With Map and Illustrations. By Sir Martin Conway. New York: M. F. Mansfield. THRough ARCTIC LAPLAND. With Map and many Illus- trations. By Cutcliffe Hyne. New York: The Macmillan Co. CHITRAL: The Story of a Minor Siege. With Maps and thirty-two half-tone Illustrations. By Sir George S. Robert- son, K.C.S.I. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. WITHIN THE PURDAH : Personal Reminiscences of a Med- ical Missionary in India. Illustrated. By S. Armstrong- Hopkins, M.D. New York: Eaton & Mains. THROUGH THEYANGTsK GoRGEs: or, Trade and Travel in Western China. With Map and Illustrations. By Archibald John Little, F.R.G.S. New York: Imported by Charles Scribner's Sons. CAMPING ANDTRAMPING IN MALAYA: Fifteen Years’ Pio- neering in the Native States of the Malay Peninsula. With Map and Illustrations. By Ambrose B. Rathborne, F.R.G.S. New York: The Macmillan Co. A CRUISE UNDER THE CREscENT: From Suez to San Marco. With Illustrations in the Text. By Charles Warren Stoddard. Chicago: Rand, McNally & Co. WITH THE GREEks IN THEssaLY. With twenty-three Illustrations by W. T. Mand, Maps and Plans. By W. Kin- naird Rose. Boston: L. C. Page & Co. THE LAND of THE PIGMIEs. Profusely Illustrated. By Captain Guy Burrows; with an Introduction by Henry M. Stanley. New York: T. Y. Crowell & Co. 1899.] THE DIAL 157 In “Through Arctic Lapland” we have the nar- rative of two daring Englishmen who set sail from London to test their adventurous spirits in the far north. They land at Vardø, on the north coast of Finland, in early summer. Their goal is the Gulf of Bothnia, four hundred miles overland toward the south. To discourage them at the outset, they find that in the summer no route of travel exists in that direction; in fact, the frequency of lakes and swamps makes such an adventure next to impossible. But the doughty Englishmen push ahead, secure short-route guides, travel double the straight-line distance, wade through swamps, row across lakes, float down rivers, tramp through forests, until, weary yet wiser men, they hail the sails of a Swedish ves- sel in the northernmost harbor of Bothnia. These polyglot and much-travelled travellers show a prodi- gious amount of pluck in enduring hardships, man- aging obstreperous Lapps and Finns, fighting mill- ions of vicious musquitos, and keeping good-natured through it ill. The customs and habits of the peo- ples of that almost solitary country are told in a humorous and spicy narrative by Mr. Cutcliffe Hyne, amply illustrated by the sketches of Mr. Hayter, the author's companion. Chiträl is located on the Chiträl river, one of the sources of the Indus river, up in the district of the Hindu Kush mountains. “The dominant note of Chiträl,” says Sir George S. Robertson, author of “Chitrál, the Story of a Minor Siege,” “is bigness combined with desolation; vast, silent mountains cloaked in eternal snow, wild glacier-born torrents, cruel precipices, and pastureless hillsides where the ibex and the markhor find a precarious subsistence.” Down deep in the gorges of these oppressive and ever-present mountains resides a restless and wretched population of natives, controlled almost wholly by the devotees of Mohammed. The con- test for sovereignty among the native claimants to the throne precipitated a revolution in the winter of 1894–95. Chiträl is almost on the borderland between British India and Afghanistan, and was under the protectorate of England. The assassina- tion of the local ruler led to an attempt by the ruler at Kabul to assume control of the district. The British Indian troops which had gone to the rescue were defeated, driven within their fort, and besieged for nearly two months. In the meantime, detach- ments of native soldiers under English officers were hurrying, in the dead of winter, from the north and from the south to rescue their comrades. Some of these men were ambushed, others were taken by treachery, and still others suffered untold hardships in crossing snow-capped and snow-bound mountains. The besieged gallantly held out, through great suf- fering, until the approach of English troops caused the flight of the besiegers and the rescue of the be- sieged. This is a thrilling and tragical story, told in chaste and forceful language by the commander in the siege. Its political significance gives it a value which far outranks that of ordinary books of war or of travel. The far-reaching influence of a medical mission- ary, especially that of a wise woman, among the vast populations of India, is shown with surprising effect by Dr. Armstrong-Hopkins in her book en- titled “Within the Purdah.” The down-trodden, hopeless condition of woman, not only in the secluded harems of princes but in open air everyday life, is enough to make one either pessimistic or actively energeticin inaugurating new means of relief. While the British government has done much to mitigate the deadly power of vicious customs, there is a wide chasm between the woman of India and ordinary comfort and freedom. This book shows where Great Britain and other enlightened nations can accom- plish marvels for this caste-enslaved and suffering people. The native princes can be won by shrewd- ness and skill of the right kind to banish heartless and harmful rites, and to order themselves and their subjects according to higher principles of govern- ment and human right. The Yangtse is to China what the Mississippi is to the United States. It drains the heart of China, embracing an area of 600,000 square miles, with a population of about 180,000,000 of as industrious and peaceful a people as are to be found on the earth's surface. This area is now known as the “British sphere of influence.” Its great river is navigable by the largest ocean steamers as far as Hankow — six hundred miles inland; then for five hundred more by steamboats to Ichang. From this point upwards it is almost one succession of gorges and rapids, through a most picturesque and wild country, though densely populated. English trade on the banks of this river has reached enormous proportions. Ten years ago, Professor A. J. Little, author of “Through the Yangtse Gorges,” excited his influence to push navigation farther up stream. After the China-Japanese war he succeeded in se- curing concessions of various kinds. Within the past year he has himself conducted a steamer through several dangerous series of rapids five hundred miles above Ichang to Chung-king, the highest point of steam navigation yet reached. In addition to a clear and concise narrative of the methods of navi- gation and difficulties encountered on the way, Mr. Little shows by statistics the wonderfully rich re- sources of this inland empire, this river empire. The power of English diplomats and merchants is seen in every gain made in the confidence of the China- man. The book is full of rare incidents observed by a wide-awake scholarly Englishman. The Malay peninsula proper, extending south- ward from Indo-China, is 850 miles long by 210 in its widest part, —between 10°30' N. and 1° 22' N. Its territory embraces about 82,000 square miles, and its population is about 1,400,000. Its most noted seaport is Singapore. Fifteen years in the jungles, on the mountain sides, and in the malarial plains of this little-known peninsula, form the basis of Mr. Rathborne's book on “Camping and Tramp- ing in Malaya.” In his brief preface, the author acknowledges that he is more skilled in the use of 158 [March 1, THE DIAL the parang, to cut his way through the jungles, than in the use of the pen. Mr. Rathborne takes his own method of telling his story. He describes with great detail many of his numerous tramps and trips back and forth through the peninsula and along its shore lines. Mingled with this description of the immediate occurrences of his trip, we find frequently little scraps of early history—as in the case of Malacca, – accounts of curious habits of the wild animals of the jungles, illustrated by some experi- ence of his own, and of the character of the natives. Incidentally, the resources, the products, the mixed population, the dangers, and the prospects of the country receive ample mention. The lack of good roads, the thickness of the forests, the lurking wild beasts, and the enemies of human life, on the land and in the air, tested the patience and endurance of this Briton. The English government, though able to do much for the natives, has not lived up to its opportunity (p. 126). It has not suppressed, but rather has encouraged by licensing, some of the worst vices in the land. In spite of these things, the British forces have suppressed the state of an- archy of two decades ago, and are gradually lifting the natives up to a higher plane of living. The whole story is enlivened by vigorous illustration. Mr. Charles Warren Stoddard’s “Cruise under the Crescent” is a chatty record of his tour along the conventional route of travellers to Syria. In a very familiar, off-hand style, he describes his jour- ney from Port Said to Jerusalem, to Damascus, to Baalbek, to Beirut, to Athens, to Stamboul, and so on. The text is besprinkled with sketches, many of them giving quite an adequate idea of the thing represented. The observations of the author show in an interesting way the impressions made upon the acute mind of an intelligent traveller. The Greco-Turkish war was short, sharp, and de- cisive. But its results cannot be measured. Many shrewd and acute correspondents were on the field to note for permanent preservation the events of each day. Mr. Rose, author of “With the Greeks in Thessaly,” must have been, we judge, among the best of these. This compact little volume testifies to his activity and descriptive power. He was the special war correspondent of Reuters, London, and consequently had the best of opportunities for close observation on the field. The political matters dis- cussed are based, says the author, upon information of men who were close to the political movements of the day. The narrative preserves with great faithfulness the exact form in which it was written in the heat of conflict. The plans and maps help one to secure a very vivid picture of that sudden and, to the Greeks, disastrous plunge of the Turk- ish army into Thessaly. Central Africa has not ceased to be of genuine interest, both to the diplomat and to the anthro- pologist. In the heart of that Dark Continent are many unexplored regions and unsolved mysteries. Captain Burrows, author of “The Land of the Pig- mies,” had many facilities, as an officer in the em- ploy of Belgium, for wide observation. The char- acter of the native tribes in different districts of the Congo Free State are extremely interesting. The cannibal natives are not all extinct, but rather flour- ish, though in the presence of the white man they endeavor to conceal their custom. The pigmies of Central Africa, though occupying but small space in this volume, are a unique little people, whom Cap- tain Burrows had good opportunities for studying. Many of the real problems of Central African trade are yielding to the introduction of the railroad and its increasing activities. Enough illustrations are inserted in this book to make it a picture-volume of Central African peoples and customs. IRA. M. PRICE. BRIEFS ON NEW BOOKS. With Volume III., now ready, Mr. William Laird Clowes's monumental and lavishly equipped history of “The Royal Navy’’ (Little, Brown, & Co.) passes the half-way stage in its progress toward completion in the forthcoming fifth volume. The sufficiently comprehensive and liberal lines on which the work was projected we have already set forth somewhat fully in our review of the opening instalment (THE DIAL, Sept. 1, 1897). The present volume covers the civil history of the Navy, the major and minor operations of its military history, and the record of voyages and discoveries, during the period 1714– 1792, inclusive. The contributors are Mr. William Laird Clowes, Mr. L. Carr Laughton, Sir Clements R. Markham, and Captain A. T. Mahan — Captain Mahan's quota occupying about a third of the vol- ume, and treating in that admirable naval writer's usual masterly way of the major operations of the War of the American Revolution. Owing to the unexpected length of some of the articles, the editor has been compelled to reserve Mr. W. H. Wilson's chapter on the minor operations of the Revolution for inclusion in the volume next forthcoming. Mr. Clowes takes occasion to allude in his preface in laudatory terms to the recent exploits of the Amer- ican Navy at Santiago and “Manilla” (as he elects to spell it), and to indicate a hope that when the British sailor's turn at the laurels shall come he will be found in no way inferior to his “brothers of the New World.” It is to be feared that the British sailor's professional anxiety to emulate the recent achievements of these same long lost and newly dis- covered American “brothers” may prove a not inconsiderable stumbling-block in the way of disarm- ament projects and peace ideals generally. Mr. Clowes's work is not, and cannot reasonably be expected to be, quite impeccable in point of minor errors of detail that might have been rectified by searching and constant reference to original sources. We are inclined to admit the reasonableness of his plea that “to be content with nothing short of abso- lute completeness and finality in an undertaking of More history of the Royal Navy. 1899.] THE DIAL 159 this kind” would involve the drawback that “neither the initiator, nor, after his death, any of his suc- cessors, would live long enough to finish the work.” On the whole, the volumes thus far are so much fairer, more accurate, and more comprehensive than any former presentation of British naval history that only critics of the captious sort will fail to be truly grateful for them. The numerous illustrations are well selected and handsomely executed, and there is an index to each volume. Mr. W. J. Stillman, since his retire- Story of - - - the Union ment from active service as Italian of Italy. correspondent of the London “Times,” has engaged himself busily in certain long-projected literary undertakings. One of these — the preparation of his memoirs — will doubtless result in a book of the most readable sort, a book the appearance of which we anticipate with much pleas- ure. Meanwhile, Mr. Stillman has already com- pleted another task which he was peculiarly well- fitted to perform, and tells us, in a new volume of the “Cambridge Historical Series,” the thrilling story of “The Union of Italy” (Macmillan). Hav- ing made this statement, we hasten to qualify two of the words which it contains. Mr. Stillman is certainly well-fitted to write of the Risorgimento, but prejudice and the disillusionment of advancing years have conspired to impair his powers of judg- ment; the story itself is certainly thrilling, but Mr. Stillman’s narrative is so matter-of-fact that it would hardly help anyone unacquainted with the great action which it chronicles to understand the Italian poems of Mrs. Browning and Mr. Swinburne. Still, we are much indebted to the author for what he has done. He was a close observer of at least the later phases of the revolutionary movement, in which he himself all but participated, and he has had a wide acquaintance with the men who were conspicuous in that movement. Admiration for Cavour has unfortunately had upon him the effect that it has had upon some other historians of the period: it has made him grossly unfair to Mazzini, unfair mainly in the negative way of saying little about him, but occasionally unfair in the more un- pleasant ways of innuendo and contemptuous char- acterization. That the Union of Italy was far more the work of Mazzini than of Cavour is a proposition that we hold to be beyond question, and no history of that achievement in which Mazzini does not ap- pear as the central figure can be more than a his- tory of its externals. Professor Harry Thurston Peck has done much for classical scholarship, and at the same time has shown a breadth of culture and a versatility of mind very commendable in this day of intense specialization. His latest production — in the shape of a book at least—is a translation of Petronius into very ver- nacular English (Dodd, Mead & Co.), with a con- siderable amount of editorial accompaniment. In ** Trimalchio’s Dinner.” his introduction, the editor has sketched briefly the history of prose fiction in Greece and Rome. Prose fiction, as opposed to theological myth, derives from the beast fable, which is purely oriental in its origin. The romance, historical and of adventure, the novel of character, the novel of pastoral life, all find their beginnings here. Lost to Western Europe in the Dark Ages, these tales, blended with the traditions of the Teutonic peoples, found their way into the “Gesta Romanorum,” that “perfect mirage of odds and ends,” the connecting link between the fiction of classic times and the fiction of to-day. Following this, we have a brief characterization of Petronius, a history of the “Satira,” and a word of criticism, or rather encomium, which closes with this dictum : “To seek a fitting parallel for his strangely brilliant fiction, we must pass over the intervening centuries and find it only in our own century and in the lit- erary art of modern France.” As a third feature of the introduction, Professor Peck gives us a note of presentation to Trimalchio himself, with a hint of the riches in store for us. This very fittingly leads to the dinner itself, where we have game made out of pork, and peacock eggs cut from pastry. The extravagant luxury of the table is typical of an age when wealth came easily and the appetites were men's gods. “Trimalchio's Dinner” is valuable as a picture of the life of the Roman bourgeoisie. In Trimalchio himself, we have the Roman freedman who has accrued vast wealth suddenly. Proud of his estates, well-meaning, generous to a fault, boast- ful of his libraries in Greek and Latin, ignorant of the very forms of his own tongue, he is a veritable snob. To the scholar, the original, in the many little details of life, is of archaeological value; and the text offers much of linguistic interest to the gen- eral reader as well. The book closes with a valu- able bibliography of the primitive forms of fiction, of Greek and Roman fiction, of Roman life in the time of Petronius, of the text and translations. The translation is well done, and the rollicking humor of the original is sustained throughout. The Latin slang finds equivalents in English which are cer- tainly effective, although at times rather startling. The illustrations are very helpful, and the entire make-up of the book is commendable. A satisfactory review of Sir James H. Ramsay’s “Foundations of England” (Macmillan) would require a mono- graph in itself if the points of interest to the eager historical student were to be adequately noted and commented upon. The work is an authoritative narrative, in two large volumes, of the history of England from 55 B.C. to 1154 A. D. It is author- itative in the sense that not a fact is given nor an opinion expressed for which the writer does not cite volume and page of the book or document from which he has drawn his material. The style is in no way remarkable, nor is there any novelty of method to attract the reader of history who looks for striking characterizations; but for reference Twelve centuries of British history. 160 [March 1, THE DIAL purposes, for convenience to the student in discov- ering quickly what the best scholarship has deter- mined in regard to the institutions of any particular period, the work is simply invaluable. It will be a standard work of reference in every college library in the country. A point of somewhat unusual inter- est is the location fixed upon for the battle of Mons Grampius, or Groupius, as the author prefers to call it. The view taken is that in the year 84 A.D. Agricola advanced from Ardoch to Perth, from Perth to Coupar Angus, and from Coupar Angus to Delvine, situated on the north bank of the river Tay some thirty-five miles northeast of Stirling. This site agrees perfectly with the details of the battle as given by Tacitus, and explains the neces- sity for the curious cavalry manoeuvre which decided the day in favor of the Roman army. The jutting promontory of the Redgale Braes made it impossi- ble for the Roman cavalry, after its first charge on the Caledonian left, to wheel round the rear of the enemy's position, and compelled it to pass back of the Roman infantry in order to make the final and decisive charge against the right. Two excellent maps accompany the description of this battle. The war articles by Charles A. Dana, recently published in one of the mag- azines, have been gathered into a comely volume entitled “Recollections of the Civil War” (Appleton). When read as a whole they prove to be fascinating in the pungency of the style and the clear directness of the story-telling. The book is also important as a contribution to the his- tory of the time, for the author's official position took him into the heart of things, and he has secured the accuracy which is apt to be wanting in reminiscences, by reference to his almost daily reports of what he saw and heard. Mr. Dana joined Grant's army in March, 1863, commissioned to act as representative in the field for the Secretary of War, and to report everything that should be of interest to the govern- ment at Washington. He was with the armies through the whole Wicksburg campaign, through the Chattanooga campaign from September to Decem- ber, and through the Wilderness campaign of 1864. During the intervals between these campaigns, and during the last year of the war, he was in service in the War Department at Washington, in intimate relations with the leading men, especially President Lincoln and Secretary Stanton. The mere state- ment of these opportunities will show what the book must be, written by a journalistic genius like Mr. Dana. Its interest is all the greater from the ab- sence of any formal narrative of the author's ser- vice and adventures. He passes over the details, giving striking incidents, brief character sketches, interesting anecdotes, and vivid descriptions of such events as the battles of Chickamauga and Chat- tanooga, and Grant's death-grapple with Lee in the Wilderness. His chapter on Lincoln and his Cab- inet is one of the most satisfactory studies of the great War President yet put into print, while nearly C. A. Dana's Recollections of the Civil War. the whole book is an indirect study of Stanton and Grant. The book is one of the most readable, as well as authentic, of those pertaining to the Civil War. - warly discovered It is a curious feeling with which one early poems takes up the “all but facsimile re- of Shelley. print,” just published by Mr. John Lane, of the “Original Poetry by Victor & Cazire.” Forty years ago Dr. Richard Garnett discovered, in a rare periodical named “Stockdale's Budget,” that a volume with the above title had been published by Shelley in 1810, and that subsequently, after a few copies had gone into circulation, the youthful poet had destroyed the greater part of the edition. For these forty years the possibility of unearthing one of the few copies that escaped destruction had hovered, as an elusive dream, over the fancies of Shelleians in particular and bibliophiles in general. At last a copy came to light, bound up with other pamphlets in a book that had come down from the library of the Rev. C. H. Grove, a brother of the Harriet Grove to whom many of the poems were addressed. To Dr. Garnett appropriately fell the task of editing a reprint of this unique copy, and the result is now before us, enriched by an editorial preface. These pieces, written at the age of eighteen, add nothing to Shelley's poetical reputation, and indeed the most striking thing about them is the way in which they illustrate the fact that a great poet may begin his career in the most unpromising way. But they add a necessary chapter to the poet's life, and it is a great satisfaction to have discovered what seemed so hopelessly lost. We have read a certain amount of carping comment upon this republication, to the general effect that it does no honor to the poet's memory; but this seems to us curiously beside the point. Dr. Garnett puts the matter in a nutshell when he says of the question whether the book should have been reprinted, that “the question ap- pears pertinent, but only to the uninitiated.” It certainly does not appear pertinent to us, and we shall not discuss it. Such a book as “Social Life in the British Army” (Harper) serves two useful ends. In Great Britain it is a manual of etiquette and social usage, aiding those ambitious of prestige in the Household Brigade in learning what to do, to be, and to wear; in Amer- ica it points out the marked differences between that European army which is most like our own, and the small but useful body of our fellow-citizens which many Americans vaguely dread under the title of “a standing army.” Nothing but such a book as this, written by “A British Officer,” and illustrated by Mr. R. Caton Woodville from drawings made on the spot, could accent these differences, and ac- cent them in a manner which leaves us better satis- fied with our own military establishment. We learn that a man must have an independent income of no mean size if he is to hold his own in one of the “crack” British regiments, the maintenance of a Social life and requirements in the British Army. 1899.] | THE IXIAL 161 stable for official duties in the cavalry comprising also a number of polo ponies and racing horses, with an occasional hunter, the original outlay run- ning up into several thousands of dollars or their British equivalents. Though England maintains several military academies of the highest efficiency, many of her officers pass through the hands of a military “coach,” and, by undergoing a somewhat severe examination, enter as commissioned officers directly from civilian life. To obtain a commission in the most desirable regiments, ascertained wealth and social position are essentials; and the traditions of the corps take the place of the American's edu- cation at West Point in maintaining the reputation of the army. It is evident that much can be said in argument between systems so diverse. The book is interestingly written, and replete with detail. The man of culture of the present day — as distinguished from the scholar, the scientist, the philosopher on the one hand, and the artist or the amateur on the other — probably owes more to contemporary France than to contemporary Germany. He has more of it in him. Certainly taking the whole century, French literature and French painting have been more stimulating than German; French pol- itics and French life have been on the whole inter- esting to more people than German. We think this is so in America, in spite of the large German element with us; in spite of the number of our own people, students and artists, who have worked in Germany; in spite of the influence of German music and musicians, of German philosophy and German scholarship. You will find a dozen who read a French novel to one who reads a German novel, a dozen plays from the French to half a dozen from the German, a dozen travellers familiar with Paris to one who knows Berlin. But it is this verything, to our mind, that gives a particular value to Professor Kuno Francke's “Glimpses of Mod- ern German Culture” (Dodd). It is a book which may serve to open the way to a great many who are now unaware how wonderfully rich is Germany to- day in books, pictures, music, political ideas, in things which when once known are as keenly inter- esting to the cultivated mind as anything that can be found in France. Without going into compari- sons, a lover of French painting and poetry may find something new and worth while in the pictures of Boecklin and Thoma, in the poems of Johanna Ambrosius and Gustav Falke. And if anyone insists on comparing, we may say that there are no French dramatists superior to Hauptmann and Sudermann (Mr. Francke would probably add Wil- denbruch, but we should not), no political forces in France more interesting than Bismarck and the Social Demokratie. As to music and scholarship, nothing need be said except just to mention them in filling out the idea of what is included in the phrase “Modern German Culture.” So far as de- tails are concerned, we differ here and there from Modern German culture. Mr. Francke : as to “The Sunken Bell,” for in- stance, we hesitate to agree entirely, as to Bismarck we are very doubtful, as to Wildenbruch we heartily disagree. There are naturally differences of opin- ion in such things: Mr. Francke probably would have more to say for his views than appears here, had he the occasion. In these essays he had to say his say in small compass, for the papers are rather short, many of them having been articles in “The Nation” and other periodicals. We have been somewhat exercised of late over breakfast-books. If a man breakfasts alone, has a little time over his breakfast and does not read the daily paper just then, he will hardly find a better moment in the day for a little reading. But of course it is not every book that will do: one must select pretty carefully. We rather think that Mr. Francke's book would be a pleasant breakfast companion for a fortnight: the essays are short and suggestive. Afterwards one may go back to Gibbon’s “Mem- oirs,” or Landor's “Conversations,” or any other old stand-by. Growth and curiosities of South London. Sir Walter Besant has taken a nota- ble interest in the history of what is now London. He has already writ- ten two volumes on London and Westminster, de- scriptive of the origin and growth of those ancient places, with their part in the modern London. He now offers a volume on “South London” (Stokes). It is not strictly a history, but a series of seventeen chapters selected out of a vast mass of material on the subject. He begins with Southwark marsh, and takes up the growth of the place, the customs of the people, numerous tragical and humorous incidents in the life of those clashing times, and the growth in the political ideas of his forefathers. This is all done in the pleasing and graceful style of Mr. Besant. The vividness and reality of the scenes described are heightened by a great number of choice illustrations, a result of the skill of Mr. Percy Wadham. Londoners, and Londoners' descendants, will find in this luxurious volume ample fascination for several hours of very pleasurable reading. In “The Groundwork of Science” (Putnam), Professor St. George Mivart discusses the common foun- dation of all the sciences and the relationships exist- ing between them. Epistemology is the science of the sciences. After an enumeration of the sciences, notable for some very proper omissions, his specific topics are the objects and the methods of science; the physical, psychical, and intellectual antecedents of science; the relation of science to language; the causes of science, and the nature of its groundwork. The work is timely and is eminently suggestive. It is itself an example of the clearness of thought and of diction which should characterize all scientific discussions. From the conclusion we quote, as a fitting dominant chord: “The action of an all- pervading but unimaginable intelligence alone affords us any satisfactory conception of the uni- Foundations and mutual relations of the sciences. THE DIAL [March 1, verse as a whole, or of any single portion of the cosmos which may be selected for exclusive study.” —A work of somewhat similar purpose, issued by the same publishers, is “The Sphere of Science,” by Professor Hoffman of Union College. After open- ing his subject by a method not widely different from that used by Dr. Mivart, Dr. Hoffman gives less attention to the purely metaphysical construc- tion of an ideal edifice in which the various sciences shall appear in their true and intimate relationships, and more to the share which each has in the devel- opment of human knowledge in its present stage of forwardness. Particular interest attaches to the author's discussions of the limitations of science, and his resumé of the recent progress made in vari- ous directions. The works of Dr. Mivart and Dr. Hoffman are in a large degree complementary, and may well be read together. Dr. Mellen Chamberlain, whose essay on “The Revolution Impending” is so valuable a feature of the Revolu- tionary history gathered into Winsor's “Narrative and Critical History of America,” presents, under the leading title “John Adams” (Houghton), a series of essays and addresses which deal mainly with American history and American leaders. Be- sides the second President, Josiah Quincy and Daniel Webster are considered in appreciative sketches. Constitutional and institutional questions are discussed, along with critical estimates of the results of historical study as shown in the volumes by Professor McMaster and Mr. Palfrey. In the collection of seventeen papers much insight into life is shown, and many thoughts are crystallized into words for the inspiration of those who welcome each addition to the store of volumes of essays bear- ing upon American character and history. American essays and addresses. New England history is an appar- ently exhaustless fountain. However much may be studied, some new phase continually presents itself for examination, and the apparently trivial things of daily life in the olden time may be so described as to make enter- taining and profitable reading. “Historic Pilgrim- ages in New England” (Silver, Burdett & Co.) is one of a rapidly increasing class of books given to details of the homes and the customs of Americans. The familiar plan of answering the questions of a bright young companion is adopted, and much that is valuable information is thus set forth. There are many illustrations, some of them uncommon, some very familiar; and the book will serve to while away more than one hour with the fathers of New England. Historic Pilgrimages in New England. Those gay armored knights under De Soto must have cut a queer figure, roaming through the forests and swamps of the southern country in search of gold, or perhaps with a faint hope of finding the fabled fountain of perpetual youth. There was little of With De Soto in Florida. actual accomplishment for Spain, but there was a great deal of romance, which culminated, perhaps, in the death of the leader of the expedition and his midnight burial in the river which so often is asso- ciated with his name. “De Soto in the Land of Florida” (Macmillan) is a very interesting book, in the preparation of which Miss Grace King has shown the same skill she manifested in “New Or- leans” and in that story of Bienville which finds place in the “Makers of America” series. It is not too difficult for the pleasure and profit of youth, nor is it so simple in narration as to fail to attract the special student of American history. BRIEFER MENTION. “Harper's Scientific Memoirs” is the name given to a new series of small books which aim to publish, in careful English translations, what may be called the original documents of science. Professor Joseph S. Ames is to be the general editor of the series. The following two volumes have appeared: “The Free Ex- pansion of Gases” and “Prismatic and Diffraction Spectra.” The former comprises papers by Gay-Lussac, Joule, and Thomson; the latter the classical papers of Joseph Fraunhofer. A few of the titles promised for early publication are: “Röntgen Rays,” “Solutions,” “Properties of Ions,” and “The Wave Theory of Light.” “The Shifting and Incidence of Taxation” (Macmil- lan), by Professor Edwin R. A. Seligman, has just passed into a second edition, which has given the authoran oppor- tunity to subject the work to a thoroughgoing revision. It is so changed, both in its historical and positive parts, as to be practically a new volume. Among the altera- tions may be noted the fuller treatment of the early English literature of the subject, the addition of a chap- ter on the physiocrats, the rewriting of the chapter on the mathematical theory, the closer study of import duties and stamp taxes, and the added index and bibli- ography. The work is thus made far more valuable than before, and a still greater credit to American scholarship in this difficult field. “Bible Stories” is the title of a supplementary vol- ume of “The Modern Reader's Bible” (Macmillan). Like the rest of the series to which it belongs, this vol- ume is prepared by Mr. Richard G. Moulton. It is announced as a “children's number" of the series, and contains stories from the Old Testament only. A sim- ilar volume of New Testament stories is in course of preparation. A much bigger book which deserves mention in the same connection is Mrs. Harriet S. B. Beale’s “Stories from the Old Testament for Children” (Stone). Here the stories are frankly retold in simple language, as in Lamb's “Tales from Shakespeare,” whereas Mr. Moulton's volume does not depart (except for omissions) from the revised scriptural text. “The Arte or Crafte of Rhethoryke,” by Leonard Cox, who was a preacher and schoolmaster in the reigns of Henry VIII. and Edward VI., is the first text-book of rhetoric in the English language. The date of its first edition is uncertain, but it cannot have been far from 1530. It is now reprinted under the editorship of Dr. Frederic Ives Carpenter, with notes and a learned introduction, and appears as a highly acceptable addition to the series of “English Studies” published under the auspices of the University of Chicago. 1899.] THE DIAL 163 LITERARY NOTES. The Macmillan Co. publish a volume of selections from Pope's “Iliad,” edited by Mr. Albert H. Smyth for school use. Miss Beatrice Harraden, it is reported, will soon make a second visit to the United States, with California for her objective point. “Der Letzte,” a story by Herr von Wildenbruch, edited by Dr. F. G. G. Schmidt, is published by Messrs. D. C. Heath & Co. Mr. William Dudley Foulke's “Slav or Saxon” (Put- nam), already twelve years old, now appears in a revised edition. It is one of the “Questions of the Day,” just as before. A selection of “Scènes de Voyages de Victor Hugo” (Holt), edited by Mr. Thomas Bertrand Bronson, makes a very attractive little volume for school use. The ex- tracts are from “Le Rhin.” “The Story of the Cotton Plant,” by Mr. F. Wilkin- son, is the latest addition to “The Library of Useful Stories,” published by Messrs. D. Appleton & Co., and already numbering more than a dozen neat volumes. The series of articles on “Successful Houses,” which have been appearing for some time in the pages of “The House Beautiful,” are now published in a hand- somely-illustrated volume by Messrs. Herbert S. Stone & Co. The first monthly number of “A Kipling Note Book,” devoted to “illustrations, anecdotes, bibliographical and biographical facts anent this foremost writer of fic- tion,” is published by Messrs. M. F. Mansfield & A. Wessels. Lessing’s “Minna von Barnhelm,” edited by Mr. A. B. Nichols, is published by Messrs. Henry Holt & Co., and has the unusual feature (for a school book) of a series of twelve illustrations from the etchings by Chodowiecki. “Our Nation's Peril: Social Ideals and Social Pro- gress” is the title of a pamphlet by Dr. Lewis G. Janes, just published by Messrs. James H. West & Co. It is a scholarly and philosophical protest against the pre- vailing spirit of imperialism. A new novel by Count Tolstoy is to be published in May. English readers will be more fortunate than Russian, for they will get the complete work, whereas it is reported that the Russian censor will reduce it by one-third for home consumption. Hereafter there is to be a special American edition of “The Statesman's Year Book.” The section upon the United States will be greatly enlarged, thereby making what has always been an indispensable work of reference even more indispensable than before. Mr. Carroll D. Wright will be the American editor and the Macmillan Co. the publishers. In emulation of the plays of the “Hasty Pudding Club” at Harvard and the “Students' Opera Company” at Columbia, the students of the University of Chicago will present a musical comedy entitled “The Deceitful Dean,” on the evening of March 10, at the University Gymnasium. The play has been written by local Uni- versity talent, and the parts will be taken by fifty persons. The “Bulletin of the New York State Museum ” for last November (a government publication) is “A Guide to the Study of the Geological Collections of the New York State Museum,” prepared by Dr. Frederick J. H. Merrill. It is a very valuable work for students and teachers of geology, having over one hundred full- page photographic plates. To put it within the reach of schools, it is supplied at the merely nominal price of forty cents. In sending out this publication for review, there goes with it the following note, which is so sug- gestive of what other States might do that it deserves reproduction: “The present director and his associates are without exception warmly interested in securing a more active coöperation of the Museum and its staff with the teachers of science in the colleges and schools of the State, which the peculiar circumstances of the Museum have heretofore made impracticable, and will be very glad of suggestions from teachers in any insti- tution in the University. Science teachers ought to feel some measure of responsibility for notifying the Museum of matters of interest in their locality and act- ing as associate or honorary members of the Museum staff, the scientific officers of which will in turn be glad, as far as practicable, to visit schools where their ser- vices are requested, and give advice and suggestions regarding collections, field work, and other matters of interest.” TOPICS IN LEADING PERIODICALS. March, 1899. Alexander, John W. Harrison S. Morris. Scribner. Alexander's Victory at Issus. B. I. Wheeler. Century. British Experience in Governing Colonies. James Bryce. Cent. Cable-Cutting at Cienfuegos. C. McR. Winslow. Century. Chavannes, Puvis de. Marie L. Van Worst. Pall Mall. Chinese Physicians in California. W. M. Tisdale. Lippincott. Cranks and their Crotchets. John Fiske. Atlantic. Cuba. Joseph A. Nunez. Lippincott. Cuban Reconstruction, Young Leaders in. Review of Reviews. Dickens Suppressed Plates. G. S. Layard. Pall Mall. Egypt, Sketches in. C. D. Gibson. Pall Mall. Eliot, Pres., as Educational Reformer. W. De W. Hyde. Atlan. English Characteristics. Julian Ralph. Harper. Farmer's Balance-Sheet for 1898. F. H. Spearman.Rev. of Revs. Faure, M. Felix. Review of Reviews. Forrest, Major-General, at Brice's Cross-Roads. Harper. Fort Dearborn Massacre, The. Simon Pokagon. Harper. Hoar, Senator, Reminiscences of. Scribner. House, Modern City, Building of. Russell Sturgis. Harper. Imperialism, an Estimate. Owen Hall. Lippincott. Indian Prince, Court of an. R. D. Mackenzie. Century. Kaiser, The, in Palestine. Frederick Greenwood. Pall Mall. Kindergarten Child—after the Kindergarten. Atlantic. Las Guasimas, Battle of. Theodore Roosevelt. Scribner. Literature of Middle West. Johnson Brigham. Rev. of Revs. Literature, Vital Touch in. John Burroughs. Atlantic. London Lawyer, Recollections of a. G. B. Smith. Lippincott. Manila, Capture of. Maj.-Gen. F. W. Greene. Century. Mendicity as a Fine Art. Francis J. Ziegler. Lippincott. Otis, Maj.-Gen. E. S. W. C. Church. Review of Reviews. Philippine Types and Characteristics. Review of Reviews. Philippines, Native Population of. Caroy Mora. Rev. of Revs. Politics, Higher, A Wholesome Stimulus to. Atlantic. Porto Rico, Condition of. W. H. Ward. Review of Reviews. Railway Service, Heroes of the. Century. Sherman, General, Diary of his Tour of Europe. Century. Spanish Capital, Scenes in the. Arthur Houghton. Century. Southern Mountains, Our Contemporary Ancestors in. Atlan. Theatre, Business of a. W. J. Henderson. Scribner. Theatre, Upbuilding of the. Norman Hapgood. Atlantic. War Censor, Experiences of a. Grant Squires. Atlantic. “Winslow,” The, at Cardenas. J. B. Bernadou. Century. Woman, Modern, with Social Ambitions. Robt. Grant. Scrib. Writers that are Quotable. Bradford Torrey. Atlantic. 164 [March 1, THE DIAL LIST OF NEW BOOKs. [The following list, containing 59 titles, includes books received by THE DIAL since its last issue.] GENERAL LITERATURE. Letters of Robert Browning and Elizabeth Barrett Barrett. 1845–1846. With Prefatory Note by R. Barrett Browning and Notes, by F. G. Kenyon, Explanatory of the Greek Words. In 2 vols., with portraits and facsimiles, 8vo, gilt tops, uncut. Harper & Brothers. $5. Mysteries of Police and Crime : A General Survey of Wrongdoing and its Pursuit. By Major Arthur Griffiths. In 2 vols., large 8vo, gilt tops, uncut. G. P. Putnam's Sons. $5. Three Studies in Literature. By Lewis E. Gates. uncut, pp. 211. Macmillan Co. $1.50. The Physician: An Original Play in Four Acts. By Henry Arthur Jones. 16mo, pp. 114. Macmillan Co. 75 cts. Thoughts. By Ivan Panin. Revised and augmented edition; 24mo, pp. 124. Grafton, Mass.: Published by the author. BIOGRAPHY. Life of General George Gordon Meade, Commander of the Army of the Potomac. By Richard Meade Bache. Illus. in photogravure, etc., 8vo, gilt top, uncut, pp. 596. Henry T. Coates & Co. $3. NEW EDITIONS OF STANDARD LITERATURE. The Temple Classics. Edited by Israel Gollancz, M.A. New vols.: Homer's Iliad, trans. by Chapman, 2 vols.; History of the Holy Graal, trans. by Sebastian Evans, 2 vols.; Marcus Aurelius, 1 vol.; Little Flowers of St. Francis, newly trans. by T. W. Arnold. Each with photo- gravure frontispiece, 24mo, gilt top, uncut. Macmillan Co. Per vol., 50 cts. BOOKS OF VERSE. Poems of Expansion. By John Savary. F. Tennyson Neely. Some Verses. By Helen Hay. 16mo, uncut, pp. 72. H. S. Stone & Co. $1. - 16mo, 12mo, pp. 129. FICTION. - Ragged Lady. By William Dean Howells. Illus., 12mo, pp. 359. Harper & Brothers. $1.75. The Heart of Denise, and Other Tales. By S. Levett Yeats. With frontispiece, 12mo, pp. 272. Longmans, Green, & Co. $1.25. The Story of Old Fort Loudon. By Charles Egbert Crad- dock. Illus., 12mo, pp. 409. Macmillan Co. $1.50. Short Rations: Short Stories. By Williston Fish. Illus., 12mo, pp. 192. Harper & Brothers. $1.25. The Knight of the Golden Chain. By R. D. Chetwode. 12mo, pp. 311. D. Appleton & Co. $1.; paper, 50 cts. Mammy's Reminiscences, and Other Sketches. By Martha S. Gielow. Illus., 12mo, pp. 109. A. S. Barnes & Co. $1. TRAVEL AND DESCRIPTION. The Porto Rico of To-Day: Pen Pictures of the People and the Country. By Albert Gardner Robinson. Illus., 12mo, pp. 240. Charles Scribner's Sons. $1.50. Roman Africa: Archaeological Walks in Algeria and Tunis. By Gaston Boissier; authorized English version by Ara- bella Ward. With maps, 12mo, uncut, pp. 344. G. P Putnam's Sons. $1.75. The Cruise of the Cachalot: Round the World after Sperm Whales. By Frank T. Bullen, First Mate. Illus., 12mo, pp. 379. D. Appleton & Co. $1.50. THEOLOGY AND RELIGION. A Manual of Patrology: Being a Concise Account of the Chief Persons, Sects, Orders, etc., in Christian History up to the Period of the Reformation. By Wallace Nelson Stearns, A.M.; with Introduction by J. H. Thayer, D.D. Large 8vo, pp. 176. Charles Scribner's Sons. $1.50 net. The Profit of the Many: The Biblical Doctrine and Ethics of Wealth. By Edward Tallmadge Root. 12mo, pp. 321. F. H. Revell Co. $1.25. Lights and Shadows of American Life. By Rev. A. C. Dixon, D.D. 12mo, pp. 197. F. H. Revell Co. $1. “Wherein 7": Melachi’s Message to the Men of To-Day. By Rev. G. Campbell Morgan. 12mo, pp. 131. F. Revell Co. 75 cts. Stories from the Old Testament for Children. By Harriet S. B. Beale, 8vo, gilt top, uncut, pp.409. H.S.Stone & Co. Old Testament Bible Stories. Edited by Richard G. Moulton. 24mo, uncut, pp. 310. “Modern Reader's Bible.” Macmillan Co. 50 cts. Mountain Tops with Jesus: Calls to a Higher Life. B Rev. Theodore L. Cuyler, D.D. 24mo, pp. 74. #. Revell Co. 25 cts. Why I Am Not an Infidel. By Robert Nourse. With por- trait, 12mo, pp. 62. F. H. Revell Co. Paper, 15 cts. SCIENCE. Essay on the Bases of the Mystic Knowledge. By E. Récéjac ; trans. by Sara Carr Upton. 8vo, pp. 287. Charles Scribner's Sons. $2.50. Experimental Morphology. By Charles Benedict Daven- port, Ph.D. Part Second, Effect of Chemical and Physical Agents upon Growth. Illus., 8vo, uncut, pp. 225. Mac- millan Co. $2. net. A History of Physics in its Elementary Branches. Includ- ing the Evolution of Physical Laboratories. By Florian Cajori, Ph.D. 8vo, uncut, pp. 323. Macmillan Co. $1.60net. A Short History of Astronomy. By Arthur Berry, M.A. Illus., 16mo, pp. 440. Charles Scribner's Sons. $1.50 net. Lectures on the Evolution of Plants. By Douglas Houghton Campbell, Ph.D. Illus., 12mo, pp. 319. Mac- millan Co. $1.25. ECONOMIC STUDIES. The Shifting and Incidence of Taxation. By Edwin R. A. Seligman. Second edition, completely revised and en- º: 8vo, gilt top, uncut, pp. 337. Macmillan Co. 3. net. Friendly Visiting among the Poor: A Handbook for Charity Workers. By Mary E. Richmond. 16mo, pp. 225. Macmillan Co. $1. EDUCATION.—BOOKS, FOR SCHOOL AND COLLEGE. Essays on the Higher Education. By George Trumbull Ladd. 12mo, pp. 142. Charles Scribner's Sons. $1. net. A Laboratory Manual of Astronomy. By Mary E. Byrd, A.B. 8vo, pp. 273. Ginn & Co. $1.35. A History of Greece for High Schools and Academies. By George Willis Botsford, Ph.D. 8vo, pp. 381. Macmillan Co. $1.10. College Requirements in English for the Years 1900, 1901, 1902. 12mo. Houghton, Mifflin & Co. Lessing's Minna von Barnhelm. Edited by A. B. Nichols. Illus., 16mo, pp. 163. Henry Holt & Co. 60 cts. Hugo's Scènes de Voyages. Edited by Thomas Bertrand Bronson, A.M. 24mo, gilt top, uncut, pp. 277. Henry Holt & Co. 50 cts. Saintine's Picciola. Trans. and edited by Abby L. Alger. 12mo, pp. 166. Ginn & Co. 40 cts. George Eliot's Silas Marner. Edited by W. Patterson Atkinson, A.M. 16mo, pp. 202. Allyn & Bacon. 40 cts. Through the Year: Supplement School Reading. By Anna M. Clyde and Lillian Wallace. Books e and Two; each illus., 8vo. Silver, Burdett & Co. Per vol., 36 cts. - Rosegger's Die Schriften des Waldschulmeisters. Ed ited by Laurence Fossler. With frontispiece, 16mo pp. 158. Henry Holt & Co. 40 cts. German Sight Reading. By Idelle B. Watson. pp. 41. Henry Holt & Co. 25 cts. Molière's Le Bourgeois Gentilhomme. Edited by F. M. Warren. With portrait, 12mo, pp. 128. D. C. Heath & Co. 30 cts. Public School Mental Arithmetic. By J. A. McLellan, A.M., and A. F. Ames, A.B. 16mo, pp. 138. Macmillan Co. 25 cts. Pope's Iliad. Edited by Albert H. Smyth. With portrait, 24mo, pp. 169. Macmillan Co. 25 cts. Wildenbruch's Der Letze. Edited by F. G. G. Schmidt, Ph.D. With portrait, 12mo, pp. 73. D. C. Heath & Co. 25 cts. Cleveland's Historical Readers. By Helen M Cleveland. Book I., Period of Discovery and Exploration in America. Illus., 12mo, pp. 131. Benj. H. Sanborn & Co. 25 cts. Our New Possessions. Large 8vo, pp. 32. American Book Co. Paper, 10 cts. 16mo, THE DIAL % $emi-ſāonthlg 3ournal of 3Literarg Criticism, HBiscussion, amb Information. THE DIAL (founded in 1880) is published on the 1st and 16th of each month. TERMs or SUBscRIPTION, 82.00 a year in advance, postage prepaid in the United States, Canada, and Mexico; in other countries comprised in the Postal Union, 50 cents a year for extra postage must be added. Unless otherwise ordered, subscriptions will begin with the current number. REMITTANCEs should be by draft, or by express or postal order, payable to THE DIAL. SpecIAL RATEs to CLUBs and for subscriptions with other publications will be sent on application; and SAMPLE Copy on receipt of 10 cents. AdvKRTIsING RATEs furnished on application. All communications should be addressed to THE DIAL, 315 Wabash Ave., Chicago. No. 306. MARCH 16, 1899. Vol. XXVI. CONTENTS. PAGE AUTHOR AND PUBLISHER . . . . . . . . 187 COMMUNICATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . 189 American Variants of Nursery Classics. Charles Welsh. Was Poe Mathematically Accurate? Albert H. Tolman. The Machine Theory of History. James F. Morton. LEWIS CARROLL OF WONDERLAND. E. G. J. 191 ARISTOTELIANISM AND THE MODERN SPIRIT. William A. Hammond . . . . . 193 SIR RICHARD BURTON'S POSTHUMOUS PAPERS. Josiah Renick Smith . . . . . . 196 HISTORICAL TREASURE TROVE. James Oscar Pierce . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197 FAITH AND FANTASY. John Bascom . . . . . 198 Mrs. Humphry Ward's New Forms of Christian Education. — Wenley's The Preparation for Chris- tianity.— Bishop Potter's Addresses to Women En- gaged in Church Work. — Halstead's Christ in the Industries. – Wace's The Sacrifice of Christ.— Andrews's Christianity and Anti-Christianity. - Welldon's The Hope of Immortality. BRIEFS ON NEW BOOKS . . . . . . . . . A survivor of the great Indian Mutiny. — The Ger- man Emperor in private life.--Fur Trading on the Upper Missouri...—A builder of Great Britain's colo- nial policy.—A general index to the Library Journal —Vase paintings as illustrating Greek tragedy.-An English biography of Mirabeau.-The prose of a poet laureate. — Afternoons in a college chapel. – The lampblack school of biography. — A plea for the Seminoles. BRIEFER MENTION . . . . . . . . . . . 203 ANNOUNCEMENTS OF SPRING BOOKS . . . . 204 LITERARY NOTES . . . . . . . . . . . . 210 AUTHOR AND PUBLISHER. In our last issue, occasion was had to say something of “the literary life” as seen through the colored spectacles of Sir Walter Besant; and it was hinted that the commercial aspects of authorship, as viewed by that doughty defender of the claims of literary property, might pro- vide us with another subject for discussion, drawn, like the former, from Sir Walter's recent volume, “The Pen and the Book.” Since Mr. Kipling is happily on the road to recovery from his severe illness, and since no other matter of pressing importance just now looms above the bookman's horizon, we may as well as anything else take our own hint, and say a few words upon a subject that it is no longer possible, thanks to Sir Walter's activities, for a literary journal to ignore. Just six years ago, we took for a subject of editorial discussion the work done for men of letters by the English Society of Authors and its distinguished chairman, and were happy to pay our tribute of commendation to the helpfulness and thoroughgoing character of that work. Since then, both the Society and its quondam chairman have been pegging stead- ily away at their rather ungrateful task, and the persistence with which they have impressed upon the public the fundamental principles that should govern authors in their business rela- tions has had an easily appreciable effect, al- though the work of enlightenment is as yet by no means complete. That these missionary labors still have much to accomplish is evident, not merely from Sir Walter's regretful admission that, in spite of all that has been said upon the subject, “au- thors as a rule know nothing” about the busi- ness side of their profession, but particularly from the “draft agreements” issued last sum- mer by a representative committee of English publishers. This document was so amazing in its pretensions, so obviously grasping in its claims, that even those authors least inclined to be combative were startled out of their easy acquiescence in the existing order of relations between publishers and authors, and began to ask themselves if, after all, there might not be something worth their attention in this discus- sion about the conditions of publication which 188 [March 16, THE DIAL they had hitherto regarded as so much noisy and hollow clamor. The Society of Authors must have chuckled rather audibly at seeing the enemy thus play into their hands, for no publication of the Society itself had ever af. forded so powerful a support to its position as this unabashed statement of what the publish- ers claimed as fairly due to themselves. As Sir Walter says: “Whether these agreements are eventually with- drawn or modified, or not, they will remain as a proof that nothing that has been said as to the rapacity of publishers as a class comes anywhere near the truth, if this committee is representative. Every possible open- ing for a fresh claim is eagerly seized upon: all the charges and accounts, according to these agreements, are to be over-stated as a right: percentages of any- thing the publisher pleases are to be added: all sums of money received are to be treated as belonging to the publisher, less whatever royalties he may choose to give : all rights whatever are to be theirs: they even claim as their own the dramatic and translation rights!” Sir Walter's indictment against English publishers is thus sustained, as far as some of its counts are concerned, by the admission of the publishers themselves. His accusation is stated in the following general terms, which, we need hardly add, he fortifies by matters of actual fact that have come to his knowl- edge. “I have no hesitation whatever in alleging as a sim- ple fact that has been brought home to me by ten or twelve years of investigation into the commercial side of literature, that many publishers, including some of the great houses, have made it their common practice to take secret percentages on the cost of every item : to charge advertisements which they have not paid for : and in this manner to take from the proceeds of the book very much more than they were entitled to do by the agreement.” Now these charges are very serious, and are not to be disposed of by calling people names. Whatever may be thought of Sir Walter's judgment — and that seems to us not infre- quently at fault—no one can seriously impugn his veracity, and we have no hesitation in ac- cepting anything which he reports as fact, whether it be the treatment of an author in some particular case, or the actual estimates given for cost of production, or the detailed statement of some “custom of the trade” which is used by publishers for the purpose of increasing their share of the profits at the ex- pense of the helpless writer of books. Few authors realize the number of distinct rights which they possess in their books. In the case of a novel, at least, there are no less than eight rights from which an English au- thor, if his vogue be considerable, may expect some gain. They are the English and Ameri- can serial rights, the English and American volume rights, the colonial and continental rights, and the rights of translation and dram- atization. If an author is not wary, he is warned that his publisher will slip into the contract some innocent appearing clause where- by some or all of these rights are transferred without their original possessor's fully realiz- ing what he is about. Certainly, an author should take expert advice in such a matter, just as he would take it in a realty transaction. The conveyancing of literary property, as of any other, calls for skill and special knowledge, which are not possessed by one man of letters in a dozen. The production of a book is a business en- terprise in which an author and a publisher are jointly interested, and the fundamental question of all is that of an equitable distribu- tion of whatever profits may result from the enterprise. We all know what publishers say when this question is raised. The burden of their plea is the risk that they perforce incur, the uncertainty of human affairs in general and of book-publishing in particular, the heavy miscellaneous expenses of their business, and the thousand and one cares of which they re- lieve the author. If they have acquired the art of saying these things suavely and impres- sively, they soon reduce the average author to a condition of mind in which he is disposed to accept gratefully, as so much unmerited largess, anything that may be offered him, and to depart from the interview with the feeling that publishers are the most benevolent of men. Now, there is something in all of these considerations; there is more, for example, than Sir Walter is willing to allow. Nevertheless, he does the cause of letters good service by hold- ing a brief for the helpless author-plaintiff, and by subjecting the claims of the publisher-defend- ant to a closer scrutiny than his client is in a position to give them. There is a good deal of the bogy element in the average publisher's talk about risk. Publishers of experience usually know enough about their business to avoid tak- ing many real risks, although their pretended risks are numerous. If it is practically certain that a thousand copies of any book of the ordin- ary sort will find purchasers, there is no risk in its publication. The author may be allowed a ten per cent royalty, and enough will remain to make a fair profit for the publisher. Now, the large publishing houses do not accept many 1899.] THE DIAL 189 books for which this moderate sale is not a prac- tical certainty, and the profits of one reasonably successful book will make up for the loss incurred through a number of the occasional ventures that do not sell to the extent of even a thousand copies. As for the division of the profits, Sir Walter is of the opinion that one- third to the publisher and two-thirds to the author, after charging up all legitimate ex- penses, would be an equitable apportionment. If we do not go so far as this, and are content to claim that author and publisher should share equally, it will still be evident that the royalty of ten per cent, customary in this country for the majority even of fairly successful authors, does not give them anything like half the profits arising from their books. The sales have only to reach two or three thousand to make this a very one-sided arrangement, as will be evident enough from an inspection of Sir Walter's fig- ures, or of any similar figures based upon the conditions of production in this country. In fact, we need in the United States some such missionary work as has been done by him in conjunction with the Society of Authors in En- gland, and their activities should stimulate a similar movement among ourselves. Perhaps we may profit by their example to the extent of avoiding the bitterness of feeling that has been engendered in English publishing circles, but the interests of American authorship need to be championed with the same zeal and dis- tinguished ability. The “method of the future,” Sir Walter believes and emphatically declares, is to be the method which treats the publisher as an agent working upon commission, “who will take none but commission books, who will take his com- mission, and no more.” This suggestion has been received with much derision by Sir Wal- ter's publisher critics, and some of them have gone so far as to characterize it as absurd if not impossible. But its champion has abund- ant facts at his disposal in support of the propo- sition, and discussion of the subject has just brought him a very effective ally in the person of Mr. Herbert Spencer, who speaks of Sir Walter's proposed method as “that which I have pursued for the last fifty years, and with the most satisfactory results.” More than a score of years ago, Mr. Spencer testified before the Copyright Commission that by this plan he received about thirty per cent (of the published price) upon a first edition of one thousand copies, and more than forty per cent upon sub- sequent editions printed from plates. COMMUNICATIONS. AMERICAN VARIANTS OF NURSERY CLASSICS. (To the Editor of THE DIAL.) The old nursery rhymes and jingles, children's play- ing games, etc., which have been current in baby-land for hundreds of years, have, like every other kind of folk-lore, been subject to all sorts of variants or cor- ruptions, call them what you will; and the standard text always cited in disputed readings is that of Halli- well — an English authority. But our own distinctly developing national charac- teristics, local influence, and the cosmopolitan admix- tures in American life, have had their effect upon these Nursery Classics, and not only has a whole group of distinctively American variants grown up, but a very great number of fresh additions to nursery and child-lore have been made since the first “Mother Goose” was reprinted in this country. A number of friends all over the States are helping in the collection of new material of this kind, and if any of your readers are sufficiently interested in the subject to take the trouble to write down any of the nursery rhymes and jingles with which they may be familiar, and send them to me, especially those they know to be local or distinctly American, they may help to bring to light much that would otherwise escape, and will aid in the most interesting work of showing how far America has gone in the direction of evolving a National Nursery Literature of its own. CHARLES WELSH. 67% Wyman Street, Jamaica Plain, Boston, Mass. March 5, 1899. WAS POE MATHEMATICALLY ACCURATEP (To the Editor of THE DIAL.) I wish to comment upon two sentences in the inter- esting article of Mr. Charles Leonard Moore in THE DIAL of Jan. 16, entitled “The American Rejection of Poe’’: “Poe, a logic machine, was absolutely incapable of those pleasing flaws and deficiencies which allow other people to have a good opinion of themselves. He always added up true.” Probably most persons would think of “The Gold- Bug” as the best illustration of the accurate working of Poe's mind. The celebrated “cryptograph” there found solves itself all right, I presume. There are some mathematical statements in this story, however, which seem to me impossible. The negro, Jupiter, is compelled by his master, William Legrand, to climb “an enormously tall tulip- tree, which . . . far surpassed . . . all other trees which I had then ever seen, in the beauty of its foliage and form, in the wide spread of its branches, and in the general majesty of its appearance.” The first great branch was “some sixty or seventy feet from the ground.” Jupiter is told to pass by six large limbs on a particular side of this tree, and to climb out upon the seventh. This last proves to be a dead branch, but capable of bearing the negro's weight, and he climbs “mos' out to the eend.” Here he discovers a skull nailed to the limb. Legrand tells him to use the “gold- bug,” tied to the end of a string, as a plumb-line, drop- ping it through “the left eye of the skull.” A peg is driven into the ground at the precise spot where the beetle falls. Legrand then fastened one end of a tape- measure “at that point of the trunk of the tree which was nearest the peg, . . . unrolled it till it reached the 190 THE DIAL [March 16, peg, and thence further unrolled it, in the direction already established, . . . for the distance of fifty feet.” About the spot thus obtained as a centre, the three as- sociates excavated a pit four feet in diameter to the depth of seven feet, but found nothing. It was then discovered that Jupiter had dropped the beetle through the wrong eye. The next time it fell at “a spot about three inches” from the previous point. “Taking, now, the tape measure from the nearest point of the trunk to the peg, as before, and continuing the extension in a straight line to the distance of fifty feet, a spot was in- dicated, removed by several yards from the point at which we had been digging.” The impossibility of the statement italicized will be at once apparent. If the skull was found ten feet away from the trunk of the tree — was it not farther ?— the centre of the new circle for digging was about six times three inches from the point about which they dug at first. If the skull were only five feet from the trunk, the second point for digging would be about thirty-three inches from the first. The journey of the three associates to the place where the chest was discovered lay “through a tract of country excessively wild and desolate.” After travel- ling “for about two hours,” they “entered a region infinitely more dreary than any yet seen. It was a species of tableland, near the summit of an almost in- accessible hill, densely wooded from base to pinnacle, and interspersed with huge crags that appeared to lie loosely upon the soil. . . . Deep ravines, in various di- rections, gave an air of still sterner solemnity to the scene.” The chest found contained “rather more than four hundred and fifty thousand dollars” in gold coins of various nations, “estimating the value of the pieces, as accurately as we could, by the tables of the period.” The gold dollar of the United States weighs 254-5 grains, and there are 7,000 grains in the avoirdupois pound. Gold coin to the value of $450,000 would weigh, roughly stated, about 1,655 pounds. Poe tells us that the weight of the other valuables in the chest “ex- ceeded three hundred and fifty pounds avoirdupois,” not including “one hundred and ninety-seven superb gold watches.” This makes the total weight of treasure over 2,000 pounds. The three companions, unexhausted by their journey and prolonged digging, carried home one-third of this treasure in the solid chest over the route indicated above. They reached their hut “in safety, but after excessive toil, at one o'clock in the morning.” After a rest of one hour, they set off, “armed with three stout sacks,” to secure the remaining two- thirds of the booty. They got back to the hut with this, “just as the first faint streaks of the dawn gleamed from over the treetops in the East.” On the second re- turn journey, if my estimates “add up true,” each of the three must have carried about 450 pounds of gold and gems. Certainly, at the time of this achievement, Poe — who tells the story as if himself the third party in the enterprise—had not weakened his bodily powers by dissipation. In “The Murders in the Rue Morgue” we read: “On the hearth were two or three long and thick tresses of gray human hair, also dabbled with blood, and seeming to have been pulled out by the roots.” Later in the story, the infallible Dupin says: “You saw the locks in question as well as myself. Their roots (a hideous sight!) were clotted with fragments of the flesh of the scalp —sure token of the prodigious power which had been exerted in uprooting perhaps half a million of hairs at a time.” (The italics are mine.) The Bible suggests that God alone can accurately number the hairs upon the human head; but I cannot think that it would have involved any impiety if Poe had made his partial estimate in this passage a little more reasonable. Let us disabuse our minds, then, of the notion that Poe always “adds up true.” Poe's fame is secure, though he can never be popu- lar. His was essentially an original mind: he was a lit- erary discoverer, and the world does not often forget its discoverers. His message is mainly, perhaps, to literary craftsmen. Whether we think of the detective story; of the scientific romance, since carried further by Jules Werne and others; of what I can only call “the short- story of atmosphere”; of certain fundamental truths in “the philosophy of composition”; of the true theory of English versification, since elaborated by Sidney Lanier; or of Poe's own peculiar type of intensely musical poetry, with its fascinating use of tone-color, parallelism, and repetition—we can say, I believe, with substantial truth, that he was “. . . . the first that ever burst Into that silent sea.” ALBERT H. Tolman. The University of Chicago, March 6, 1899. THE MACHINE THEORY OF HISTORY. (To the Editor of THE DIAL.) Will you permit me a word with reference to that “machine theory” of history to which Dr. Hinsdale, in your issue of Feb. 16, justly takes exception? History is a science, and should be scientifically studied. Sci- ence is concerned with facts. The facts respect the nature, action, evolution, and effects of substances and forces. The facts of history have regard to men, and ought to exhibit the action, development, and progres- sive influence of the forces of his nature. We wish to learn from history what man has done, and why he has done certain things. As in a natural science we learn the significance of phenomena from their causes and effects, so in history we find the meaning of man's actions in his character, the motives that control or direct his movements. Only in this way can we make a just estimate of an actor's career, and gain trustworthy and valuable instruction from the experience of those who have preceded us. What signified the deeds of a Pericles, an Alexander, a Marcus Aurelius, or a Caracalla? Do we find the mean- ing of their lives in the isolated phenomena called their acts, without inquiring whether these were laudable or culpable? In some cases, perchance, two persons of opposite character did like things. Did their doings have the same significance and influence? If we wished to direct our life by theirs, should we simply ask what things they did? The reciter of acts and occurrences is merely a diar- ist, an annalist, or a compiler. The historian, worthy of the name, is not a mere collector of political or social phenomena. He must form judgments of men and re- late their acts to their character. He must be judicial, and must know the conclusions of science in its promi- nent departments; for he should tell us not merely what men have done, but what their lives have meant. JAMEs F. MoRTON. Andover, N. H., March 3, 1899, 1899.] THE DIAL 191 Čbe #tto $ochs. LEWIS CARROLL OF WONDERLAND.” That was a sensible bit of advice given to “Lewis Carroll” in a letter from his occa- sional publisher, Mrs. Gatty, in 1867, in which, after complimenting her correspondent on the quality of a sketch about to appear in her mag- azine, the lady went on to say: “One word more. Make this [story] one of a series. You have great mathematical abilities, but so have hundreds of others. This talent is peculiarly your own, and as an Englishman you are almost unique in pos- sessing it. If you covet fame, therefore, it will be, I think, gained by this.” “Lewis Carroll” (as perhaps not a few read- ers may even to-day need to be reminded) was the pen-name of the Reverend Charles L. Dodgson, Mathematical Lecturer at Christ Church, Oxford, and an author of repute in the abstruse field mildly disparaged by Mrs. Gatty. For a period covering almost the last half-century, he belonged to “The House,” scarcely ever leaving it; and, says his biogra- pher (himself of Christ Church), “I, for one, can hardly imagine it without him.” While attending closely to his professional studies and duties, he early began relaxing his mind and indulging his natural bent in writing humorous verses for “The Comic Times,” a London imi- tator of “Punch,” which soon after became merged in a new venture, “The Train’’; and it was in “The Train’” (of May, 1856) that his future famous pseudonym, “Lewis Car- roll,” first appeared. Under the date July 4, 1862, there is a very interesting entry in the Diary: “I made an expedition up the river to Godstow with the three Liddells; we had tea on the bank there, and did not reach Christ Church till half-past eight. . . . On which occasion I told them the fairy-tale of ‘Alice's Adventures Underground,’ which I undertook to write out for Alice.” It was on this summer afternoon that Mr. Dodgson improvised for the amusement of the three little girls who accompanied him those adventures in “Wonderland,” which were later re-written for publication by the advice of George Macdonald, who had seen the story in the original manuscript as written out by the narrator for Miss Alice Liddell. “Alice’” herself (now Mrs. Reginald Hargreaves) gives the following pleasant account of the momen- tous excursion up the Thames: “Most of Mr. Dodgson's stories were told to us on river expeditions to Nuneham or Godstow, near Oxford. My eldest sister was “Prima,’ I was “Secunda,” and “Tertia” was my sister Edith. I believe the beginning of ‘Alice' was told one summer afternoon when the sun was so burning that we had landed in the meadows down the river, deserting the boat to take refuge in the only bit of shade to be found, which was under a new- made hayrick. Here from all three came the old peti- tion, “Tell us a story,’ and so began the ever delightful tale. Sometimes to tease us Mr. Dodgson would stop suddenly and say, “And that's all till next time.” “Ah, but it is next time,’” would be the exclamation from all three; and after some persuasion the story would begin afresh. Another day, perhaps, the story would be begun in the boat, and Mr. Dodgson, in the middle of telling a thrilling adventure, would pretend to go fast asleep, to our great dismay.” On July 4, 1865, just three years after the memorable row up the river, Miss Liddell re- ceived the first presentation copy of “Alice's Adventures in Wonderland,” the second copy going to Princess Beatrice. In 1867 Mr. Dodgson published his book on “Determinants,” and we can fancy the sur- prise of the Christ Church undergraduates when they learned that “Lewis Carroll” of “Wonderland” was none other than their pre- ceptor of the lecture hall and author of that learned treatise. In 1857 Mr. Dodgson first met Tennyson, whom he thus describes: “A strange shaggy-looking man; his hair, moustache, and beard looked wild and neglected; these very much hid the character of the face. He was dressed in a loosely fitting morning coat, common grey flannel waist- coat and trousers, and a carelessly tied black silk hand- kerchief. His hair is black; I think the eyes too; they are keen and restless — nose aquiline — forehead high and broad—both face and head are high and manly. His manner was kind from the first; there is a dry lurk- ing humor in his style of talking.” Mr. Dodgson's faculty for seeing things in a funny or extravagant light is illustrated by his amusing descriptions of Berlin, which place he visited while on a continental tour with Dr. Liddon. “. . . Wherever there is room on the ground [they] put either a circular group of busts on pedestals, in consultation, all looking inwards—or else the colossal figure of a man killing, about to kill, or having killed (the present tense is preferred) a beast; the more pricks the beast has, the better,-in fact, a dragon is the cor- *THE LIFE AND LETTERs of LEwis CARRoll (Rev. C. L. Dodgson). By Stuart Dodgson Collingwood. Illustrated. New York: The Century Co. * “And ever, as the story drained The wells of fancy dry, And faintly strove that weary one To put the subject by, “The rest next time ’ — ‘It is next time!’ The happy voices cry.” (From verses prefacing the “Wonderland.”) 192 [March 16, THE DIAL rect thing, but if that is beyond the artist he may con- tent himself with a lion or a pig. The beast-killing principle has been carried out everywhere with a relent- less monotony, which makes some parts of Berlin look like a fossil slaughter-house.” Early in 1869 Mr. Dodgson's “Phantas- magoria” was published, and a few days later the first chapter of “Behind the Looking- Glass” was sent to the press. In 1871 the lat- ter story appeared, and at once scored a huge success. “I can say with a clear head and conscience” (wrote Henry Kingsley to the au- thor) “that your new book is the finest thing we have had since “Martin Chuzzlewit’.” “Jabberwocky,” Mr. Collingwood says, was at once recognized as “the best and most original thing in the book”; and we learn, as to the origin of this (to our thinking) rather silly production, that it was composed as a contri- bution to a game of “verse-making ” at an evening party. Much may be risked with a public that accepts rhymed gibberish as humor; and in 1876 Mr. Dodgson put forth his “ Hunt- ing of the Snark,” a chef-d'oeuvre of sheer nonsense over which John Bull grinned for a twelvemonth. By the Browning Clubs “The Snark” was rapturously hailed as a godsend in the way of a new repository of hidden mean- ings, until the author set speculation of that sort at rest by calmly announcing that his poem had no meaning at all. “I’m very much afraid,” he wrote to an anxious elucidator of poetic rid- dles in America, “that I did n't mean anything but nonsense,”— thus closing forever a most promising field of research. In 1879 appeared Mr. Dodgson's most elabo- rate mathematical work, “Euclid and His Mod- ern Rivals,” an original book in its way, cast in dramatic form, and relieved by humorous touches in the author's happier and saner vein. In 1883 occurred his controversy with the “trade,” in the course of which appeared his pamphlet on “The Profits of Authorship.” Touching the publisher's share of the spoils, he wrote: “The publisher contributes about as much as the bookseller in time and bodily labor, but in mental toil and trouble a great deal more. I speak with some personal knowledge of the matter, having myself, for some twenty years, inflicted on that most patient and painstaking firm, Messrs. Macmillan & Co., about as much wear and worry as ever publishers have lived through. The day when they undertake a book is a dies nefastus with them. . . . I think the publisher's claim on the profits is on the whole stronger than the bookseller's.” “A Tangled Tale,” one of the best of Mr. Dodgson's books, and a most quaint and de- lightful medley of fun and mathematics, came out in 1885. A brief quotation will show the whimsical turn of the humor. “Balbus ” (a tutor) and his pupils go in search of lodgings, and one of the party, after the usual questions, anxiously inquires of the landlady “if the cat scratches.” “The landlady looked round suspiciously, as if to make sure the cat was not listening. “I will not deceive you gentlemen,” she said. “It do scratch, but not with- out you pull its whiskers | It'll never do it,” she re- peated slowly, with a visible effort as if to recall the exact words of some written agreement between herself and the cat,” “without you pulls its whiskers l’ “Much may be excused in a cat so treated,” said Balbus as they left the house and crossed to No. 70, leaving the landlady curtseying on the doorstep, and still murmuring to her- self, as if they were a form of blessing – ‘not without you pulls its whiskers'!” Mr. Dodgson's next book was “The Game of Logic" (1887), an elementary method for children, rendered palatable by such quaint syllogisms as “No bald person needs a hair-brush; No lizards have hair: No lizard needs a hair brush.” “Sylvie and Bruno" was issued in 1889, and its sequel “Sylvie and Bruno Concluded ” fol- lowed four years later. In this work, Mr. Collingwood says, are embodied the ideals and sentiments most dear to the author. It is didac- tic in aim, written with a definite purpose of turning its writer's influence to account in en- forcing neglected truths; but it falls short of the fresh and spontaneous “Alice” books as a work of art — considerably short of them, we think. Mr. Dodgson died at Guildford Rectory, on January 14, 1898, and he lies in Guildford Churchyard, under a white cross bearing the name “Lewis Carroll”—surely one, in a spe- cial sense, to conjure with. “Lewis Carroll” may be numbered with those writers of our day who have added a new note to literature; therefore his books have that in them which is likely to win them readers for many years to come. “Alice in Wonderland ” may well prove to be one of the world's books whose freshness time cannot stale. Mr. Collingwood's Life leaves with us the wholesome impression of a singularly pure and engaging character, and no lover of “Lewis Carroll” should fail to read it. The book is a pretty one, richly illus- trated, mainly with photographic plates of Mr. Dodgson's friends, including portraits of Ten- nyson, Alice Liddell, Hunt, Millais, the Ros- settis, Tenniel, Ellen and Kate Terry, Mr. Ruskin — the last, one is constrained to hope, a bad likeness. E. G. J. 1899.] THE DIAL 193 ARISTOTELIANISM AND THE MODERN SPIRIT.” It is true, Aristotelianism has been shorn of its authority as an officially sanctioned system of philosophy and science, — a species of au- thority, however, contradictory to the spirit of that system and of its originator. It is no longer the official philosophy of the academic world, or even of the Roman court as in the days of the Scholastics. But had the free, inquiring, progressive spirit of Aristotle lived amongst the Scholastics, he would unquestion- ably have been an anti-Aristotelian. He would have joined the ranks of his historical adver- saries. Authority, in the sense of a binding or school dogma, is a fetich to which Aristotle never paid homage. On the other hand, there is another form of authority still left to him, namely, the authority which proceeds from the prestige of a great reputation and from intrinsic reasonableness of doctrine. It cannot be gain- said that there is a cogency merely in a great name or reputation which forces or tends to force assent. The popular ascription of supe- riority to any man carries with it the conces- sion of authority in that particular reference. It is a type of hero-worship, in which we now- adays reserve to ourselves the democratic free- dom of electing our authorities in terms of our own prejudices. Generally speaking, we have in philosophy and science no authority foisted on us, save what comes from the officialdom of popular opinion, or, in certain circles, from ecclesiast- ical tradition. Belief in the possibility of an absolute exorcism of the supposed evil spirit of authority is merely the hallucination of a man who sees visions. And even if such exorcism were possible, there is ground for reasonable doubt whether it would be desirable. The spirit of trust, of reverence for authority, and the con- tentment of a conservative mind, are real safe- guards to the direction of development. Mere motion is not always progress, and radicalism is not a synonym of advancement. Against excesses of radicalism and the spirit of mere mobility we are equipped with a wholesome counter-instinct of reverence for the traditional and of caution in revolutionary measures. The early years of the struggle of modern science under the influence of Bacon and the anti-Scholastics are often characterized as a *ARIsroTLE AND THE EARLIER PERIPATETICs. Being a translation from Zeller's Philosophy of the Greeks, by B. F. C. Costelloe, M.A., and J. H. Muirhead, M.A. In two volumes. New York: Longmans, Green, & Co. revolt against the bondage of Aristotelianism and as emancipation from the errors of that system. To such a degree is this true, that writers are often disposed to blame Aristotle personally and to regard him as the arch-enemy of progress. In view of this attitude on the part of modern critics of the progress of sci- ence, it is curious to note the fact that Aristotle a year before he died fled from Athens owing to an indictment for heresy and ultra-progres- siveness; while the progressive liberals of the Baconian era bring an indictment against him as the inspiring genius of the ultra-conservatives. Thus, owing to the immense change in the Zeitgeist, diametrically opposite charges are brought against the same philosopher. The truth is that Aristotle is not to be meas- ured by the use made of a part of his system by the Roman Catholic Church, but by the advancement in science made by him over his own predecessors and by the intrinsic worth of his own philosophy; i.e., he is to be measured both by reference to his historical environment and the then contemporary state of science, as well as by the test of the reasonableness and suggestiveness of his doctrines. He is in no- wise chargeable with the stagnation of the middle ages, unless we are to censure the mag- nitude of his genius for reducing Europe dur- ing these long centuries to almost abject intel- lectual slavery. The fault was not in the master, but in the slave. Further, we cannot rationally pass censure on him for not having observed that which can be seen only by the aid of a microscope or other instrument of modern invention. It is mainly by virtue of instru- mental equipment, the collection of large bodies of material, the organized coöperation of sci- entists, and the increased facilities for record and distribution of results of investigations, that modern science has triumphed over the ancient, and not by virtue of any superior intellectual endowment or acumen. On the other hand, where modern science has gained in intension it has lost in extension. It is, to be sure, satisfied with this sacrifice of the quan- titative for the qualitative. At the time Aris- totle wrote, the methods of the exact sciences were not known. One would, therefore, expect to find him most successful in ethics, politics, and metaphysics; and this we find to be true, although modern scientists have bestowed un- measured praise on his work in the investiga- tion of nature. This praise is due mainly to the fact that he clearly saw the superior value of the objective over the subjective method in 194 [March 16, THE DIAL natural science, and saw it in spite of the well- nigh complete bondage of his contemporaries to a priori speculation. For this reason certain modern scientists have bestowed on the Stagirite praise as exag- gerated as were the denunciations of Bacon, Ramus, or Luther. Between the unqualified detraction on the one hand, mere dreary ex- posure of mistakes, and the inordinate praise and impossible eulogies on the other, Zeller maintains a sobriety of criticism which forces the reader's confidence. Cuvier, on the con- trary, commenting on the “History of Ani- mals,” says: “I cannot read this book without being ravished with astonishment. Indeed, it is impossible to conceive how a single man was able to collect and compare the multitude of particular facts implied in the numerous gen- eral rules and aphorisms contained in this work, and of which his predecessors never had any idea.” Buffon, speaking of the same work, says: “Aristotle's ‘History of Animals’ is perhaps even now the best work of its kind; he probably knew animals better and under more general views than we do now.” Even George H. Lewes, who quotes the foregoing passages from “The French Historians of Na- ture,” and who has the strong anti-metaphys- ical bias of Positivism and is usually a severe critic of Aristotle, in speaking of Aristotelian- ism in general, says: “His [Aristotle's] attain- ments surpassed those of every known philos- opher; his influence has only been exceeded by the great founders of religions.” St. George Mivart goes the length of saying (“Contem- porary Evolution,” p. 179) : “What is needed, and what evolution will in fallibly bring about, is not a return to a philosophy, but a return to the philosophy. For if metaphysics are possi- ble, there is not, and never was or will be, more than one philosophy, which, properly under- stood, unites all speculative truths and elimi- nates all errors: the philosophy of the philoso- pher—Aristotle.” Romanes, who cannot be accused of having any bias for Aristotle, says: : “Whether we look to its width or to its depth, we must alike conclude that the range of Aris- totle's work is wholly without a parallel in the history of mankind.” (“Contemporary Re- wiew,” Wol. 59, p. 276.) Luther, whose attacks on Aristotle exhibit an animus which one would expect, usually denounces him in toto, but in one passage (Bd. lxii., p. 262, Erlangen ed.) he concedes Aristotle's excellence in ethics, while, in a high-handed way, he summarily and unexplainedly condemns his philosophy of na- ture: “Aristoteles ist der besten Lehrer einer in Philosophia morali, wie man ein fein züchtig ăusserlich Lebenführen soll; in naturali Phil- osophia tauger nichts.” Again: “Derweise Mann Aristoteles schleusset fast dahin, es sei die Welt von Ewigkeit gewesen. Da muss man je sagen, er habe gar nichts von dieser Kunst gewusst” (Bd. xxiii., p. 241). This denunciation was all because Aristotle's cos- mical theories, especially that of the eternity of the world, conflicted with the Lutheran the- ology. Between the exaggerated praise of Buffon and the exaggerated denunciation of Luther, there is, as usual, a truer middle ground. While Aristotle's works teem with scientific blunders, they are also filled with fundamental and epoch-making truths, and it is not an over- statement of historical fact to say that no spirit in the progress of civilization has exerted so profound an influence on the life of science as Aristotle. In the pre-scholastic centuries this influence was exerted mainly through the trea- tises on Logic; but from the time of Thomas Aquinas the introduction of natural science into the Western world by the Arabs, the entire body of the Aristotelian canon was known to European scholars. It must not be supposed that Aristotelianism is at the present moment extinct. The religious system of John of Damascus, which is founded on Aristotle's log- ical and metaphysical doctrines, is to this day recognized as the standard of orthodox dogmatic theology in the Greek Church, while in the Roman Catholic Church under the pa- tronage of the present Pope, Leo XIII., the influence of the Aristotleian Aquinas is espe- cially in the ascendant. So that Aristotelian- ism is still a living and vital element in these two immensely potent forces of the Greek and Roman ecclesiastical organizations. The height of Aristotle's influence was reached in the twelfth century, at which time he dominated the best educated and most subtle minds of Europe. In the early part of that century the Arabs of Spain became the masters of the schoolmen, and through Averroes (Ibn Raschd) made themselves powerful factors in the contemporary civilization; but the Spanish Aristotelianism stood for pantheism in which all special providence was denied. This doc- trine was formally repudiated by the Latin Church, and in 1270 was anathematized by the Bishop of Paris. Besides Thomas Aquinas, Albert the Great was a leading figure in the Aristotelianism of that century, and a little 1899.] 195 THE DIAL later Dante was moulded in the study of the Stagirite. In his vision in the fourth canto of the “Paradiso” he speaks thus of il maestro: “When I had lifted up my brows a little The master I beheld of those who know Sit with his philosophic family. All gaze upon him and do him honor.” (iv. 131, Longfellow's Translation.) During the Renaissance the “Ethics” and “Politics” were widely read. In the seven- teenth century Aristotle's influence waned, owing to the tendency in the new natural sci- ence to independent observation. Again, at the beginning of the present century we find an important revival of Aristotelian studies innder the leadership of Trendelenburg. . It is the beginning of a period characterized by the rise of historical criticism and the wane of dog- matism, whose direction was largely given by Lessing, himself a devoted student of Aristotle. In the early decades the Berlin Academeny of Sciences issued the great standard quarto edi- tion of all the works, including “Scholia,” etc., on which was employed the flower of Ger- many's scholarship; in the thirties, Barthé- lemy Saint-Hilaire began his monumental French version, which he lived to complete after sixty years of labor interrupted at intervals by civic duties. Grote, the historian, left us the torso of two volumes that illustrate even more than his other writings his splendid industry. It was this work, to which Grote was devoting the last years of his failing health but perennial enthusiasm, that induced him to decline a peer- age of the United Kingdom offered in the pre- miership of Gladstone. Besides the foregoing, a large number of volumes on particular parts or aspects of Aris- totle's system have appeared in Germany, France, and England, but nothing has been published during the century of more consid- erable moment for Aristotelian studies than the two volumes of Zeller now before us, giving as they do a systematic exposition of the sig- nificance and content of the whole of the Peri- patetic philosophy, with a critical estimation of its value and defects, and an account of its external history. One is especially glad to have it in English, for we have nothing whatever that satisfies this lacuna in our literature. Zeller is, without exception, the most skilful interpreter of Greek philosophical ideas that ever put pen to the subject, and it will be many a long year before his work is antiquated. He has a rare combination of fine critical acumen, power of lucid and orderly statement, just dis- crimination of the values of evidence, immense patience for detail, astounding range and pre- cision of learning, and withal a judicial spirit in the handling of controversial matter. He rejects without flinching all interpretations inspired by harmonistic tendencies, however skilfully they may rescue Aristotle's consist- ency and relieve him from the charge of con- tradiction; and everywhere he maintains a rigidly conscientious attitude toward the canons of evidence. Although he does not underesti- mate the profound intrinsic significance of the Aristotelian system or its great influence on the processes of civilization, he never attempts to smoothe away difficulties by forced explana- tions. He has the courage to leave these dis- crepancies as they are. The translators have done skilful work in giving us a really English treatise, which brings the reader scarcely a suggestion of its foreign source. Zeller never fails to make his state- ments in clear, unmistakable sentences, very unlike the usual treatise that comes from Ger- man scholars. His manner of writing is akin to that of the Anglo-Saxon genius; and his translators have been, for this reason, the more easily able to provide an English version which might well have been originally an English Classic. The volumes have a value of the first order. One is almost disposed to think of them as definitive in their method of structure, while their subject-matter is indubitably of lasting interest. The ultimate problems of philosophy may still be awaiting their satisfactory solution, and men of science have now and again decried the attempt as impossible; yet, as Kant says in the Kritik der reinen Vernunft (Max Müller's trans., p. xxxi.) : “It is vain to assume a kind of artificial indifferentism in respect to inquiries the object of which cannot be indifferent to human nature.” The teachings of Aristotle are of both historical and present interest. In certain disciplines, the important thing is not the state of contemporary science, but the per- sonality of the thinker. In ethics, e.g., the deliverances of great spirits are not so much affected by the conditions of science as by the temperament of the man, the character of his will, and the energy of his feeling and vision. The utterances of such spirits on subjects of this kind do not become obsolete. What was said by Socrates, Aristotle, Marcus Aurelius, and Jesus, on the nature of the moral life is in the main universally applicable, and not pe- culiar to conditions of time or place. In questions where one is concerned with the 196 THE I) LAL [March 16, immutable principles of human nature, the deliverances of men who have had a genius for morality (men may have a genius for morality as much as for mathematics) are as little sub- ject to obsoletism as the Homeric epics, the creations of Dante, or the divine forms of Gothic art. And these problems of the human spirit and its relation to the conduct of life and to the nature and knowledge of reality, although they may be most difficult of solu- tion, none the less they do lie nearest to the heart. The answers we find to such ques- tions amongst the Greeks, and particularly in Aristotle, are marked by the rigor of original- ity, clear, simple, without artificiality. Greece, to use an idea of Trendelenburg's, is not our gray antiquity so much as the fresh youth of our spirit. p WILLIAM A. HAMMOND. SIR RICHARD BURTON’s POSTHUMOUS PAPERS.* When Richard Burton died at Trieste in 1890, the world lost an intrepid explorer, a keen observer, and a polyglot scholar. His ad- venturous career was unique in the nineteenth century, and will find no successor in the twen- tieth. He had ranged the habitable globe— the Orient and tropics by preference; and had studied anthropology at first-hand, with an unsurpassed equipment for his work. In him were united English tenacity, Anglo-Saxon restlessness, a gift for languages like that of Mezzofanti, and a certain trampling brusque power of description that always seemed confi- dent of winning by the mere fascination of its material. Burton was a “much-neglected traveller”; what honors he had came late; and the posthum- ous honor which may come from this triad of essays will hardly add to his varied fame, though in certain respects they are faithful suggestions of the man. In addition to the forty-eight works published during his life, there were left at his death some twenty MSS., the publication of which was placed absolutely within the dis- cretion of his widow, Lady Burton. She pub- lished her “Life of Sir Richard Burton,” and editions of his “Arabian Nights,” “Catullus,” and “Il Pentamerone”; and was arranging for the publication of others, when she died *THE JEw, THE Gypsy, AND EL Islam. By Sir Richard F. Burton. Edited by W. H. Wilkins. Chicago: Herbert S. Stone & Co. (March, 1896); and the MSS.—with the dis- cretion — were entrusted to Mr. Wilkins. The three papers now brought together by Mr. Wilkins are of unequal merit. The first one, “The Jew,” is an unfavorable criticism upon the most persistent race in history: its steadily anti-Semitic spirit would delight the soul of Pastor Stoecker or the Jew-baiting pop- ulace of Paris. Burton's various Eastern con- sulates enabled him to know the Jews of the Orient widely and well; but his attempt to de- fend the atrocities against the Jews of the Middle Ages by the suggestion of previous greater atrocities committed by them is gratu- itous. The chapter on the Talmud is interest- ing; but the mingled absurdity and vindictive- ness of its anti-Gentile teachings are shown up with a relish which is unpleasant to contem- plate. The truth is that none of us, as nations, can turn over the leaves of our darker youth without wincing ; and it is unfair to erect the police reports of the Levant into a studied indictment of a race whose achievements and services to civilization are conceded by all who read history with untrammelled judgment. “The Gypsy” is an attractive ethnological study, for the writing of which Burton was admirably well-equipped, even if he had not in his veins that infusion of Romany blood with which he was generally credited. Its merits are somewhat impaired by a lack of proportion: nearly half of the 150 pages being a polemic against the claims of M. Paul Bataillard to priority in identifying the Gypsies with the Jat of the banks of the Indus. This, as well as the comparative word-lists, can naturally be of interest to very few outside the ranks of experts in “Chinganology.” But the chapters devoted to a survey of the “children of out-of-doors” in the various continents, whether called Gitano, Zigeuner, Tzigane, or Jat, are really fascinat- ing, and could have been written by no one else. Burton penetrated everywhere, was under- stood of the Gypsies in all lands, and learned their traditions and character with a complete- ness approached by no other Englishman, ex- cept, perhaps, his great contemporary, George Borrow. “El Islam,” the third in this group of studies, is an essay of about sixty-five pages. It was written, as Mr. Wilkins tells us, about 1853, soon after that daring and successful pilgrim- age to Mecca which made Burton famous. It is a sympathetic apologia for the “Saving Faith ”; and the tone is, on the whole, both moderate and philosophic. With Burton's 1899.] THE DIAL 197 usual lack of perspective, however, nearly two- thirds of the paper is given to a resumé of the other great religions displaced by Islamism in the Orient; and the author has thus left him- self only about twenty-five pages in which to establish his proposition. He sets himself the task of correcting what he believes to be the four most popular errors of the time (i.e., 1858) in regard to El Islam. These are, in his own words, as follows: I. “It is determined to be merely a receptive faith, and therefore adapted only to that por- tion of mankind whose minds, still undeveloped and uncultivated, are unripe for a religion of principles.” The author affirms this to be “partly correct of the corrupted, untrue of the pure, belief; it will somewhat apply to the tenets of the Turks and Persians, but not to those of the first Muslims and the modern Wahabis.” II. “Men object that The Saving Faith is one of pure sensuality.” This is refuted by a summary of the numerous injunctions of the Koran, condemning nearly all the pleasures of this life; followed by the claim that “those who best know El Islam, instead of charging it with sensuality, lament its leaven of asceticism. They regret to see men investing these fair nether scenes with mourning hues; ‘the world is the Muslim's prison, the tomb his stronghold, and Paradise his journey's end.” But this could not be otherwise. Asceticism and celibacy are the wonted growth of hot and Southern cli- mates, where man appears liable to a manner of religious monomania.” III. “The third error is that the Founder of the Saving Faith began his ministry as an en- thusiast and ended it as an impostor.” Burton's answer to this is substantially the tu quoque, claiming for Mohammed the full measure of sincerity conceded to other Founders. IV. “The fourth error is that Muhammad, unable to abolish certain superstitious rites and customs of the ancient and Pagan Arabs, incor- porated them into his scheme, and thus propi- tiated many that before avoided him.” In the author's answer to this, which is too long to quote entire, we are prepared for his “conclu- sion of the whole matter,” as follows: “Muhammad's mission, then, was one purely of re- form. He held that four dispensations had preceded his own, and that his object was to restore their pristine purity. But the Adamical had been obsoletized by the Noachian scheme; and this by the Mosaic, which, in its turn becoming defunct, had left all its powers and pre- rogatives to Christianity; thus also the latter dispensa- tion, in the fulness of time, had been superseded by the revelations of the Saving Faith. All the past was now effete and abrogated. All the future would be mere imposture; for his was the latest of religions, he the Soul of the Prophets.” The book, it should be added, is beautifully printed and bound; is provided with an index; and has a finely etched portrait of Sir Richard Burton, from the painting by Lord Leighton. JosLAH RENICK SMITH. HISTORICAL TREASURE TROVE.” The historian who records the recent mani- festations of good-will and esteem between Great Britain and the United States should give prominent place to the restoration to Mass- achusetts, in 1897, of the original manuscript of Governor Bradford's History of “Plimoth Plantation.” No later occurrence between the two peoples, though in itself more sensational, can testify more unequivocally of an undercur- rent of mutual respect and affection than the romantic episode of this restoration. This record of a chapter in our early history is the candid and dignified statement, by one of the foremost actors, in language modest and unaf- fected, of that dramatic movement in the evo- lution of modern freedom which made the Pilgrims from eastern England the first found- ers of a newer England on the Western con- tinent. It is the contemporaneous recital, by one of themselves, of the successive acts for several decades of that Pilgrim company whose career has made a wonderful impress upon the history of the world, and of whom it was well said by Governor Wolcott, in his address ac- knowledging the receipt of the precious volume: “In the varied tapestry which pictures our national life, the richest spots are those where gleam the golden threads of conscience, cour- age, and faith, set in the web by that little band.” The Bradford manuscript is a spontaneous revelation of that conscience, courage, and faith; and as such, it is held dear in the affec- tions of all Americans. Lost to us for nearly a hundred years, it was found in the archives of the established church of that nation which has so often been represented as our hereditary enemy. After thirty-seven years of unsuccess- ful attempts to recover it, the patient and affa- ble solicitations of Senator Hoar and Ambas- *BRADFord's HISTORY OF “PLIMOTH PIANTATION.” From the original manuscript. Printed by order of the Gen- eral Court, Boston, 1898. 198 [March 16, THE DIAL sador Bayard succeeded. Good-will was in- voked, rather than diplomacy, and it awoke an answering chord of good-will in Great Britain: the ecclesiastical authorities in the mother-land surrendered to the commonwealth of Massa- ghusetts the custody of her heirloom, the sur- render being accompanied by conditions so little burdensome as to evince the sincere es- teem which prompted it. The story of the loss, the search, and the recovery is told in the intro- duction to the handsome reprint of the old man- uscript which the commonwealth has recently issued. This history was printed in 1856 from a copy which had been secured in England, so that its contents are already known to historical stu- dents. The present issue is, however, timely, and will be welcomed by American readers. It is a verified representation of the text of Gov- ernor Bradford, retaining all the variations of his independent spelling. Facsimiles of a few pages of his manuscript form appropriate illus- trations to the text. While this edition does not pretend to compete, in the esteem of anti- quarians with the elaborate edition which repro- duces the whole manuscript in facsimile, it will find high place with the reading public, by virtue of its clear typography and its well- ordered index. The quaint and almost archaic style of Brad- ford's prose is far from tiresome, and he is so faithful an annalist, and so free from undue self-assertion, as to give to his unfashionable diction a charm of its own. The faith, hope, and courage of that band of adventurous pil- grims shine through his pages, tempered by a charity which lends to the whole narrative a tone of impartiality characteristic of true his- tory. Important episodes are often illustrated by copies of original documents, as in the cases of the Mayflower Compact, the articles of the New England confederation, and much of the correspondence between the Pilgrims and the adventurers. Such writings give us history from original sources; and imprints like this of writings of that class are appreciated and read with avidity by that largely increasing public who are delving in early American an- nals, and are daily finding new episodes of mar- vellous interest in our Colonial experiences. JAMES OSCAR PIERCE. MR. WILLIAM ARCHER, the well-known English dra- matic critic, is shortly to visit the United States for the purpose of writing a series of articles on “The Stage in America.” The articles will appear in what is now an international magazine, the “Pall Mall.” FAITH AND FANTASY.” Faith, from the very nature of the case, is espe- cially exposed to becoming fantasy. Faith deals with the deeper implications of our sensuous life. The unseen and eternal are open to it. This ex- ploration, slipping the restraints of experience, is especially liable to become fanciful. Hardly another doctrine could have so opened the doors of imagina- tive thought—of reason winged by fancy—as the assertion that absolute truth is contained in Scrip- ture, and is open to any man's unfolding. The processes of each mind are thus given a final author- ity which needs no correction from the flow of events. Religious truth is made independent of that com- prehensive scheme of things of which it is a part. The rationalistic fancy of the ill-trained spirit meets with no check from the moral experience of the world, and with no instruction from the historical unfolding of our spiritual life. The lesson of events is lightly set aside in behalf of an immature render- ing of the fundamental conditions and principles of our being. Faith suffers the disparagement of fancy, because it takes no pains to steady itself by an accumulative rendering of the spiritual events of the world. We are disposed to accept as the keynote of the present criticism the brief discourse on “New Forms of Christian Education,” by Mrs. Humphry Ward. Not because the religious thought of the world is ready to fall into harmony under it, but because it best presents the true constructive centre, subject to which the unison of faith is to be reached. Mrs. Ward summarizes her own view of Christian Edu- cation with much distinctness. Thus, she says in conclusion: “Each of those relations and duties may, if we will, be connected with the beloved and sacred name of him who stands both by inherent genius and by the irrevo- cable choice of men at the head of the spiritual life of Europe, and still bequeaths even to our far-off genera- tions the maintenance and spread of his work. All things may be done to God in Christ; and that our chil- dren should learn from us so to do them is the task of Christian education. Only in the patient struggle to fulfil it week by week, and day by day, till the educa- tion of childhood merges in the sterner education of ‘maturity, can we hope, parent and child, teacher and taught, for the growth which alone is true life—growth in that temper at once of self-surrender and indomitable *NEw ForMs of CHRISTIAN EDUCATION. By Mrs. Hum- phry Ward. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell & Co. THE PREPARATION For CHRISTIANITY. By R.N. Wenley. Chicago: Fleming H. Revell Co. ADDREsses to Wom EN ENGAGED IN CHURCH. WoRK. By the Right Reverend the Bishop of New York. New York: E. P. Dutton & Co. CHRIST IN THE INDUSTRIEs. By William Riley Halstead. Cincinnati: Curts & Jennings. THE SACRIFICE of CHRIST. By Henry Wace, D.D. New York: The Macmillan Co. CHRISTIANITY AND ANTI-CHRISTIANITY. By Samuel J. Andrews. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons. THE Hope of IMMoRTALITY. By the Rev. J. E. E. Welldou. New York: The Macmillan Co. 1899.] THE TXIAL 199 hope, which yields all that man has and does, his forms of faith, no less than the grosser claims of self and flesh, to the action of the indwelling, all-transforming God, whereof the chief representative in history is Jesus Christ.” The address seems to us to be more pervaded by the sense of loss than by that of gain. Our attention is drawn rather to the salvage that attends upon a disastrous wreck than to the pure metal which comes forth when the dross has been purged from the ore in a refining process. The certainty of faith is greater, not less, when its data have been subjected to the most thorough sifting of experience. Only then are the breadth and inescapable force of our inferences apparent. The second book on our list, “The Preparation for Christianity,” lies in line with this correction of belief by the history of its development. “The atmosphere of our lives was created by Him, far more completely than the majority of us are even vaguely aware; our institutions have been molded by His spirit; our most effective ideals centre in Him; and upon His career and all its consequences rests our hope for eternity. These are not opinions, but facts capable of no dispute whatsoever, simply because they are his- torical, and have been becoming more and more of the essence of history for nigh two thousand years. Conse- quently, no Christian can have a firmer foundation for his faith than that which rests immovable upon the his- torical influence issuing from the life of Christ” (p. 22). We are glad of a new work from Professor Wenley. His thought is wont to be free and stimulating. The purpose of the present volume is to trace the converging influences of Grecian, Jewish, and Ro- man civilization on Christianity. Any adequate treatment is exceedingly difficult. The theme read- ily lends itself to the intense and vague. The book has marked excellences. The criticism we should be most inclined to make is that the discussion is too purely one of ideas, – a tracing of the intel- lectual and spiritual inheritance that has come down to us. The thought would have been made more definite, and at the same time more comprehensive, if the social life of which these ideas were the fer- ment—the social life which limited them and was limited by them—had been more fully given. This would have been in keeping with an introductory chapter in which the author lays strong emphasis on the unity of our lives in society. The entire theme, however, is like a rich and widely branching mine to be worked by many in many generations. Our author returns from his exploration with his own treasures. “Addresses to Women Engaged in Church Work” is a small volume made up of a few brief lectures—waifs of stimulus and guidance in an ac- tive life. They lay little claim to literary form, but they are full of that earnest spiritual temper which renders the words and acts of Bishop Potter so valuable. The themes are of a character fitted to renew thought and impulse. The author of “Christ in the Industries” ex- plains his purpose at once. “It is written for busy people, who have no time for an extended treatise, and perhaps no tastes for the details of sociological study, and yet would like to keep abreast of modern movements, and of the new applications of Chris- tian thought.”. The volume lies in the line of this intention. Its subjects are: “The Dignity of Labor,” “Social Transformations,”“Some Friends of Labor,” “Industrial Problems,” “The Future of Labor in America.” The volume is plain, whole- some bread, which should, in one form or another, be on every man's table. “The Sacrifice of Christ” is another effort to soften the colors in which orthodox belief has painted the death of Christ, and to give them a more subdued and natural expression. So far it is a response—one that has often been made—to that deepening impression by which the whole procedure of salvation becomes growth under the wide uni- versal conditions of physical and spiritual law. So far, we may feel disposed to commend the treatise, and yet we must think that a little more of the same process leaves only the faintest outline of the old conception. It is replaced by a less definite, but far more glorious, vision of spiritual life steadily unfolding within itself. “Christianity and Anti-Christianity” is a much belated volume. A title more immediately disclos- ing the purpose of the book would have been “Christ and Anti-Christ.” Of all the fancies which have fastened on Christian faith, few have been more per- sistent and more misleading than that of Anti-Christ. The primary purpose of the author is to bring for- ward this shattered and discarded image, pad it into shape once more with the errors and alleged errors of science, literature, and social life, and set it up as a menace to unbelievers, and an historic landmark on the road to the New Jerusalem. That he does his work with more moderation than is wont to belong to this kind of effort, is but scant atonement for un- dertaking it at all. No labor could be more futile than one designed to crowd the truly prosperous events of our spiritual life off from their present natural basis and force them back on the out-worn uninstructive and unreal conceptions associated with Anti-Christ. “The Hope of Immortality” is another evidence both of faith and of the want of faith. If by faith we mean the rational hold of the mind on truths which cannot be proved, yet seem to it deeply involved in the facts before it, then no doctrine makes a more direct appeal to faith than that of immortality. The mind that has slight hold of the underlying principles of the spiritual world will always accept this belief with hesitancy. Those who find the foundations of religious doctrine dis- turbed by the changing currents of speculation will begin at once to distrust the full consummation of faith expressed in immortality. It is not strange then that many are striving to restore to the eye those spiritual forces that find their completion in a 200 [March 16, THE DIAL future life. “The Hope of Immortality” is a sys- tematic, methodical treatise. It moves leisurely and comprehensively. It treats of the nature, history, and value of this belief; of its evidence under two aspects, external and internal; and of the amplifi- cations of the belief by Christianity. It is not quite sufficiently touched by the spiritual temper of our time. It is still possessed by sonvictions which have somewhat lost their hold. This is seen in the weight it gives to the internal evidence, the nature of the spirit. It lays emphasis on its indiscerptible char- acter. This argument implies more knowledge than we have of the nature of spirit, and proves quite too much. On the other hand, the author does not sufficiently amplify and enforce the moral argument. As physical predictions fail us, spiritual predictions gain power. The spirit of the book is of the best. John BAscom. BRIEFS ON NEW BOOKS. Colonel Edward Wibart gives an extremely interesting account of his personal experiences in India during the Mutiny, in his “The Sepoy Mutiny” (imported by Scribner). At the time of the outbreak Colonel Vibart was a young subaltern in a regiment of na- tive infantry occupying cantonments two miles to the northwest of Delhi. He is now the sole surviving officer of that garrison. When the news reached the cantonments of the riots in the city following the arrival there of the mutinous sepoys from Meerut, detachments were sent out to quell the disturbance; but it soon became evident that the native troops were disaffected, as they offered no resistance to the mutineers, suffering them to murder the Eu- ropean officers before their eyes and even joining in the bloody work. Colonel Wibart with his regiment proceeded to the Cashmere Gate, which they occu- pied, and in the fortified enclosure of which he and the other European officers presently found them- selves entrapped and besieged by a bloodthirsty band of native soldiery composed largely of their own men, who deserted en masse as soon as free- dom of choice between their European masters and their revolted fellow-countrymen was clearly offered to them. The position of the little group of besieged English, whose numbers had been in the meantime increased by the addition of several refugees, among them four ladies, from Delhi, soon became desper- ate. Their place of refuge was a trap, and flight was the sole alternative to death and mutilation at the hands of the now everywhere victorious muti- neers. The escape of Colonel Wibart and his com- panions from the Cashmere Gate into the open country seems little short of miraculous, and we have read few tales of similar adventure more thrill- ing than the recital of the subsequent wanderings from village to village through a roused and hostile country of this little band of fugitives. The sepoys A survivor of the great Indian Mutiny. were at times hot on their trail and in plain sight from their places of hiding, and they were more than once in imminent danger of violence at the hands of disaffected townspeople. Occasional instances of kindness at the hands of compassionate natives are grateful to read of; and but for the offices of these dusky good Samaritans whose char- itable hands offered the starving and exhausted fugitives furtive gifts of milk and chupatties, Colonel Vibart and his companions would certainly never have lived to tell the tale of their flight from Delhi. That tale is told modestly and directly; and to it is added an account of the author's subsequent share in the siege of Delhi, and in the operations at Cawn- pore and Lucknow. Colonel Wibart saw the dead bodies of the three princes summarily slain by Hodson, whose action in thus taking the law into his own hands he mildly condemns as “a most inju- dicious act”! We should call it plain murder— essentially a military lynching, and not a whit better morally than the sepoy atrocities for which it was a reprisal. There is no evidence whatever that the princes shared in the massacre of Europeans in Delhi; and a British officer who, after the siege was over and the victory won, deliberately slew his help- less and unresisting prisoners in cold blood and with his own hand, simply put himself on a level with Nana Sahib, and stained the for the most part glo- rious record of the suppression of the Bengal Mu- tiny. Colonel Wibart's book contains some interest- ing plates, some of them from photographs dating back to the period treated. Two supplementary chapters, by P. W. Luke and Colonel Mackenzie, the one giving the “true version” of the so-called “fateful telegram” popularly believed to have saved India, the other narrating the particulars of the Meerut outbreak, are given; and there is some interesting supplementary matter in the Appendix. The temperate and judicial tone of The German Emperor in M. Maurice Leudet's chatty book, private life. “The Emperor of Germany at Home” (Dodd, Mead & Co.), is to be commended. As a Frenchman, M. Leudet has not forgotten Sedan, and he plainly looks forward to a day of reckoning with Germany; but he speaks by no means unkindly of the Germans, and not disrepect- fully of their Emperor. To his view William II. is an ambitious, somewhat flighty, yet clever and versatile young man, who believes that a King's business is to be a King, and not the ward of a Chancellor or the mandatory of a majority. That William is vain, with a pompous, peacock species of vanity, that prompts him to sun himself in the public eye in raiment of gorgeous hues and infinite variety, M. Leudet does not deny; but he scouts the notion that the erratic young ruler is a mere empty megalomaniac — the neurotic “William the Witless” of the more irreverent English journals. William's particular b8te noire is England; and against her he would combine Russia, Germany, and France — a scheme which M. Leudet regards with 1899.] 201 THE TOIAL much disfavor. Republican America, with its irrev- erent notions of royalty and its habit of jeering at the pretensions and theoretical sacrosanctity of Consecrated Persons in general, William naturally dislikes, regarding her politics and her pork with a jealous and hostile eye. To M. de Blowitz he once observed: “I fear on one side the danger of a cer- tain invading and continued extension with which Europe is threatened by one of her races” (the English, thinks M. Leudet), “armed with all the resources which civilization puts and will put at the service of her ambition; and on the other side I fear the intervention of the New World, which is beginning to develope appetites from which it has been up to now free, and which will before long wish to interfere in the affairs of the Old World and to meet half way the ambitions, always waking, which are stirring around us.” The famous tele- gram to old Krüger, and the doings of “Brother Henry” at Manila, may be taken as some evidence of the sincerity of the above manifesto. All in all, the Emperor of Germany appears in M. Leudet's pages to be, politically considered, a personage whose demise the world in general will in all probability regard with an equanimity bordering on satisfaction. He is temperamentally a disturbing factor whose elimination will make for European stability. M. Leudet's book contains a good deal of detailed de- scription of the Berlin royal family and ménage, drawn largely from a recently published German book on the successor of Frederick III., by Herr Oscar Klaussmann. To show the reader William II. in private life is M. Leudet's aim, though political questions are pretty freely touched upon through- out. Judging from the pictorial display in this book, the Emperor has, among other eccentricities, a mania for getting himself photographed. Following “The Journal of Jacob Fowler,” lately issued in the “Amer- ican Explorers Series” (F. P. Har- per), we now have “Forty Years a Fur Trader on the Upper Missouri,” by Charles Larpenteur. The author was a Frenchman who made his way direct from France to the Upper Missouri in 1833, in the palmy days of trapping and fur-trading in the vast region extending to the Rocky Mountains; and in this region he remained until his death, in 1872, most of the time in the service of the American Fur Company. His personal narrative is an admirable mirror of the trapping and fur-trading life on both its savage and civilized sid