almost alone has preserved for us the very form and pressure, we are immeasurably in his debt. There are few things that we know as well as what it was to be a boy in a Missouri country town, a futile skirmisher in the early days of the Civil War, and a traveller on the lower Mississippi, few 306 [May 1, THE DIAI, bygone types that are as real to us as the miners and stage-coach drivers and politicians and bar- room loaf era of the untutored West of the mid- century. The writings in which these things have been preserved for us are Mark Twain's best, be- cause they are his raciest and least self-conscious. The next best group of his books is provided by "The Innocents Abroad," "A Tramp Abroad," and "Following the Equator," the three extensive records of unconventional travel. Yet in these the touch of sophistication is seen, and becomes progressively pronounced with each succeeding narrative. The second is not as good as the first, and the third is distinctly weaker than the second, more artificial in its conception and more forced in its humor. When the author transplanted himself to the East for permanent residence in the seventies, he aban- doned the primal sources of his inspiration, and never developed others of comparable import- ance. Going farther and farther afield in search of fresh material, he illustrated anew the myth of Antaeus, and displayed a pitiable weakness. Over some of his later flounderings in the alien elements of literary criticism, history, and met- aphysics, it were best discreetly to draw a veil. There was in him a streak of the Philistine which might have remained undetected had he "kept to his last," but which was sharply revealed when he infringed upon the domain of intellectual and scholarly concerns. The present is not, however, the best occasion for dwelling upon Mark Twain's limitations, or for emphasizing the ephemeral character of a considerable part of his work. A fair share of that work, at least, stands upon a level so high as to be in no danger of passing out of sight. Up to an advanced point in his career, he grew steadily in power and wisdom; his sympathies became ever broader and deeper, and his expres- sive faculty kept pace with the larger demands that were made upon it. From the exuberant journalist who gave us entertainment in his earlier days he developed into something like a sage to whom we came to look no less for counsel than for amusement. We learned to detect in his homely speech the movings of a fine spirit, instinct with the nobler promptings of democ- racy, hating shams and ostentatious vulgarity, gentle and gracious in its quieter moods, but fanned to burning indignation when facing some monstrous wickedness, such as the corruption of our political life, or the dastardly act of the American soldier in the Philippines who be- trayed his rescuer and shamelessly boasted of the shameful deed, or the infamy of the royal libertine who distilled a fortune from the blood of the miserable natives of the Congo. Even more than by his strictly literary work, he earned our gratitude for the brave words which he spoke upon such themes as these, words that cleared the moral atmosphere and made us see things in the light of naked truth. Nor should we, in our tribute to the man, forget the silent heroism with which he endured loss of fortune in his advancing years, and shouldered the burden of a debt incurred by the rascality of his associates, a debt for which he was only indirectly responsible, and which he might have evaded without serious impairment of his reputation. The strenuous labors of the years of lecturing and writing which enabled him to discharge in full the shadowy obligations which he then assumed took their toll of his vitality, but won for him an esteem higher than is ever the reward of the artist alone. This action ranks with the similar examples set by Scott and Curtis; it is one of those shining deeds that reveal the man himself, in contradis- tinction to the works by which most men of creative genius are contented to be known. The attitude of criticism toward Mark Twain as a writer has undergone a slow but complete change during the past thirty years. From being thought of simply as a "funny man," of the kin of Josh Billings and Artemus Ward, he has gradually come to be recognized as one of our foremost men of letters. This is a pro- foundly significant transformation of opinion, and to account for it fully would require a more careful analysis than we here have space to undertake. The recognition has been unduly delayed, partly because so much of his output has been utterly unworthy of his best self, and partly because his work in its totality is of so nondescript a character. The conventional way to distinction in literature is by the fourfold path of the poem, the play, the novel, and the essay. Occasionally, also, an historian compels literary recognition. But Mark Twain was neither a poet nor a playwright nor an historian. He was hardly a novelist, either, for his share in " The Gilded Age " does not seriously count, and his work in the form of fiction is not remarkable as story-telling pure and simple. If we are to group him at all, it must be with the essayists, using that term elastically enough to include with him our own Irving, and such Englishmen as Swift and Carlyle. We must either do this, or fall back upon the sui generis solution of the problem. Again, if we make a subdivision of the essayist class forthe humor- 1910.] 307 THE DIA1, ists alone, we encounter the difficulty offered by our obstinate association of that terra with mere fun-making and the appeal to the lighter inter- ests of human nature. Obviously, our subdi- vision must take yet another step, and admit that, on the one hand, there are humorists who make us laugh and have hardly any other influence over us, and humorists who are also creative artists, and critics of life in the deeper sense, and social philosophers whose judgments are of weight and import. If we are to classify Mark Twain at all, it must be with the latter distinguished company ; and his title to kinship with the three English writers above mentioned, and even with such alien prototypes as Aristo- phanes and Rabelais and Cervantes, is at least not scornfully to be put aside. BJORNSTJERNE BJORNSON. The survivor of the Norwegian Dioscuri — if a classical similitude he permissible in the case of two such sturdy Goths as Ibsen and BjOrnson— closed his eyes in Paris on the 26th of April. His death- bed was surrounded by the members of his family, and he passed peacefully away after an illness of many months. A less vigorous frame would not have gone through the crisis of last February, when his death was hourly expected. At that time, the critical journals of the world (The Dial included) paid their respects to his tame, and he had the unusual experience of living to read (if he cared for such entertainment) an extensive collection of what were, to all intents and purposes, his obitu- ary tributes. His life was continued well along into his seventy-eighth year; and few lives have been so worthily lived, or made so helpful to human kind. His nation ( become a nation largely through his efforts) mourns him as it mourned Ibsen, but with a difference; for he inspired love in no less measure than respect, and was a national figure in a deeper and more intimate sense than was ever his famous compeer. And the world mourns with Norway, for he has been a figure of cosmopolitan significance since that time in the seventies when his outlook became broadened, and he plunged into the main current of the stream of modern thought. Politics, sociology, science, education, and religion, have all been enriched by his activities and his intuitions. Yet it is probably as the singer of the people's songs, and as the artist who portrayed their simple lives and vivified their heroic and legendary past, that his fame will chiefly endure. Other ages will have new problems to face, and new prophets will arise to give guidance for their solution; but the poet of "Ja, vi elsker" and "Over de Hoje Fjelde," the creator of "SynnOve Solbakken" and "Arne," the restorer of Sigurd Slembe and Olaf the Holy, is reasonably sure of immortality. THE INTERREGNUM IN AMERICAN LITERATURE. "Authors, do not read your contemporaries," was the sage advice of Matthew Arnold. Authors, do not write about your contemporaries, is perhaps a better counsel, and one which I have tried to follow. I used to read my contemporaries religiously, — and I ought to have had a pension for my efforts in this line. But I did not think I could serve them or the public by criticising them, and for a good while I have busied myself with the things which I know are abiding. But even to one who sports his oak to the present, a great silence outside may become audible, a great vacancy may make itself felt. I suppose everyone is agreed that we have in literature no recognized kings or princes of the blood, no glittering court which fixes all eyes. And that we had such regali- ties in the past, powers that were potent in their own day, is also recognized. What has come over us? The late Thomas Bailey Aldrich, master of a magic flute, said, in a letter dated in 1891, that for the next twenty years poetry was going to have a hard time in America. Never was there a truer prophecy. But why? The commonly received explanation is the materi- alism of the age, which in turn is due to the great advances in the physical sciences and to the enormous increase in wealth. Such explanation leaves me unconvinced. Mankind is always, in the main, material—is chiefly concerned with getting a living and having a good time. And other ages have equalled ours in scientific discovery, and, propor- tionally, in wealth. No recent material discovery is on the same plane with the finding of America and the establishment of the rotundity of the earth. No late scientific hypothesis equals the Copernican theory or the law of gravitation. No modern inven- tion is so far-reaching in consequences as the inven- tions of printing, of the mariner's compass, or of gunpowder. And in the ages which saw these marvel- lous developments of science and discovery, religion and imagination, literature and art creation, walked abreast of the other activities of man. People did not stop going to church, or singing love or festal songs, or recounting the heroic legends of their race, because of Columbus or Galileo or Guttenberg, or Newton. If anything, the achievements of these men stimulated the mind of the world. There is perhaps more plausibility in the wealth theory. Wealth, really, only respects wealth; and intellect, really, only respects intellect. The person- ages of the two camps do not come together very well. And of late the masses, dazzled by money and its uses, have weakened in fealty to intellect and turned their whole worship to the Golden Calf. But rich men have often stood by literature and art. The traditions of the English aristocracy, for instance, have always been to foster these—to the extent, at least, of buying books and objects of art. And rich nations have often gone art mad. The Athenians 308 [May 1, did not become an art people until they acquired the spoils of the Persian War — until they won the gardens of the Cyclades, the commerce of the Mediterranean. No,—nations like individuals must be born with certain faculties or tendencies. "What is the best way to become beautiful?" asked a young girl of her doctor. "Well, my dear, the best way I know is to be born pretty." Perhaps America was behind the door when the fatal gift of beauty was given out. But these are large considerations, and may be tossed about in a good many ways. It is better to come down to the actually appraisable tendencies and influences that have made for what at least seems to be a period of comparative dulness and poverty in American literature. The preaching and practice of the dogmas of realism may account for some part of our weakness. I have never been able to attach much importance to the fanciful labels of classic, romantic, realistic, symbolic, and the like, which writers give them- selves and fight for. There is a real distinction between the different forms of literature, between tragedy and comedy, the novel and the play, narra- tive and lyric poetry. But all literature is based on human nature, on the spectacle of the world, on the thoughts and dreams of men. The reports of these things differ according to the talents of the authors, but not by any set formulas. The Agamemnon is just as real as the last novel founded on the same theme of the unfaithful wife. So while our doctri- naires have filled our ears with the fury of their words, I do not believe they have done much harm beyond withdrawing writers too much from what Rossetti called " fundamental brain-work " and mak- ing them trust too much to observation. Miss Ellen Terry, in her Autobiography, says that when she first played Ophelia she went to the madhouse for models. But she found that she had to imagine first and observe afterwards. That, I judge, is really the law of all art. You must know what you want to do, and then take from nature the materials for doing it. A more important cause for our comparative failure in pure literature is the American appetite for the didactic. Other and perhaps sounder nations are content to take part of their instruction in life from art, to absorb it from the examples in great literature. But with us nothing will do but the direct hortatory word. Dean Swift left his money to the Irish people to found a madhouse,— "To prove by one satirio touch No nation needed it so much." Possibly American authors have expended the exchequer of their intellects on the didactic, for a similar reason. Everyone preaches in America — our Presidents, the presidents of our colleges, maga- zine editors, and so on down the line. No wonder the clergy are overslaughed. They don't get half a chance. The word is taken from their mouths. Now the critic would be a fool indeed who would decry the province and power of the didactic in literature, or deny the nobility and usefulness of the works it has brought forth. Two poets so important and opposed as Pope and Wordsworth are liege subjects of the Lord of Didacticism. And our own Emerson holds his titles from the same hand. To me it seems, however, that all these men are takers of second prizes. In pure literature, didacticism should be the sauce, not the piece de resistance. The business of literature of the central type is to depict life — life real, great, grotesque, charming, ridiculous; life ideal, noble, and beautiful. And an overplus of moralizing spoils both the truth and beauty of the picture. Men of letters can afford to leave the direct preaching and enforcement of morals to the clergy, who are trained and paid to do such work. If Beauty is the beginning of literature, tragedy is its culmination. It is certain that we do not love tragedy to-day in America. We put it aside as something black and unpleasant and intruding, like cockroaches or the cimex lectutarius. That we had the feeling for it, the stern joy in it, in the past, is also sure. We read and applauded our great writers who explored the heights and abysses of human nature, who faced all the horrors and deaths of spirit and body, and rose above them, winged, ex- alted, victorious. As long as we refuse to deal with such losses and gains of life, we doom our literature to mediocrity. Some of our critics explain our deficiency in great- ness by the irreverence of our minds, by the lowness and vulgarity of our humor. Now I do not think our humor is irreverent enough or low enough or vulgar enough for that. Perhaps our humorists have not got it in them; but more probably they, like Dr. Holmes, do not dare to be as funny as they can. Public opinion compels them to be decent- Wit can be as genteel as it pleases; but great humor — the world-upsetting kind — can hardly exist with- out grossness. It is the foil to the noble side of life, and what is the use of a foil which tries to look as much as possible like its principal. Matthew Arnold, Puritan and precisian as he really was, has some coarse though not gross scenes in his Friend- ship's Garland — and his whole heart went out in critical approval of Burns's " Jolly Beggars " and the bestialities of Faust and Aristophanes. He knew what literature was, and always declined to accept dishwater or weak tea as efficient substitutes. Of our own men, Irving in the past was not afraid to be low. Of course all the great humorists of the world—Aris- tophanes, Boccaccio, Cervantes, Rabelais, Moliere, Shakespeare, Sterne, Fielding, Goldsmith, Burns, Goethe, and Heine — have been utterly contemptuous of decency and the proprieties when they wanted to give the reality of the animal side of human life. The magazines, — taking them in full — have done a good deal to depress the vitality and destroy the originality of our recent literature. A novel writer has his direct appeal to the public, but for the poet, essayist, or short-story writer, the maga- zine has been the only path of access. This has placed a great power and responsibility in the edi- THE DIAL. 309 tor's hands. But for the most part these miscellanies are commercial undertakings. To pay, they must appeal to a wide public; and to reach this public they must give it what it understands and can appre- ciate. There must therefore be an inevitable level- ling down that there may be some uplift. I have no doubt that the editors do their best to reconcile lit- erature with an appeal to the masses. But their best, a little way off, does not loom large. I remem- ber once being shut up alone in a house with a com- plete set of one of our oldest and most respected magazines. It was in a little inn on the top of Mount Mansfield; and for several days the fog hung over the mountain, so that I could not get about. Never mind, I thought, there is solace within! But as I turned over volume after volume of the magazine, and realized the mediocrity of the verses, the dul- ness of the essays, the tameness of the domesticated variety of the short-story, my soul grew dark within me, and I took my chances in the fog outside. The late Charles A. Dana is reported to have said that he edited the New York "Sun" for an audi- ence which was thirteen years old. Now my last indictment of our lateliterature is that it has been edited for women, who have been its main readers. Women, like the pretty realism which reproduces the everyday facts of their lives. With their practical instincts and craving for authority, they approve of didacticism, which seems to them plain good-sense. Although playful and witty, they have no great turn for humor, and coarseness disgusts them. They are in themselves the best exponents of Beauty, but they are by no manner of means the Beauty worshippers that men are. Their plastic sense is naturally weak, and hardly extends beyond an appreciation of pretty gew- gaws; so that the form, color, picture, music of verse makes little appeal to them. What they demand in poetry is sentiment and emotion. Tragedy hurts them; it was the women who fainted when the Eumenides of vEschylus rushed upon the stage. They do not see the good of the crimes, horrors, and vio- lence necessary in tragic work. Of course these are sweeping charges, and they are open to many excep- tions; but in the large they are true. And certainly men do not want any general reformation in feminine nature in these respects. We are fairly content with women as they are. But if we are going to relegate altogether to them the reading of books, literature will of course follow the lines suited to their tastes and instincts. Mr. Aldrich's period of probation is nearly past. After its twenty years wandering in the desert, Poetry may at last be coming to the Promised Land. In prose there are signs of a leavening and lighten- ing of the vast soggy mass of realism, didacticism, and sentiment. Real creative imagination, real humor, real wit, begin to be apparent. But Poetry, with its balanced wings of sense and spirit, is the true angel that must move the waters. Until we believe in Poetry again, we shall not be saved. Charles Leonard Moore. CASUAL COMMENT. The public library's vast accumulation of trash — for such, in sober truth, much of our cur- rent literature will hereafter be adjudged to be — may well give us pause. At the recent dedication of the new building of the Pennsylvania Historical Society, Mr. Charles Francis Adams took occasion to utter a warning against the indiscriminate pres- ervation of printed matter. "I venture a confident opinion," he declared, "that the world of scholar- ship would be in no wise appreciably poorer if one- half, and that the larger half, of the printed matter now accumulated in our public libraries could to- morrow be obliterated — swept clean out of exist- ence." With a book production yearly increasing, it is no wonder that library buildings designed to serve the needs of a century to come prove inade- quate in a quarter of that time, or even in less. Yet who can anticipate the verdict of posterity on our present literary output, and so decide what ought to be kept and what discarded? The now familiar expedient (urged by Dr. Eliot) of providing a storage room or building for at least the temporary deposit of all likely candidates for oblivion, thus relieving the groaning shelves of the book-stack, is worth considering, even though the storage of inac- tive books is far more expensive than their summary destruction. The responsibility of deciding, peri- odically, what portion of a library's possessions should be committed to the flames is obviously greater than most librarians would care to assume. But to cull out, now and then, a few authors to be sent to the morgue, there to await a more or less remote posterity's mandate for their decent burial, would be a less serious matter; and at any moment a book thus provisionally offered as a prey to dumb forgetfulness could, on second thought, be restored to the warm precincts of the cheerful day and per- haps put once more into lively circulation. The whole problem, however, is so serious, so increas- ingly serious, that no off-hand solution of it is pos- sible. Happily, like so many other diseases, this bibliothecal congestion will tend to work out its own cure, and it will be some time yet before our library book-stacks actually scrape the sky. Over-capitalization in literature — in the printed page — is a matter on which a few timely words may be said; as also a few words on under- capitalization. Capitals are a precious asset in the printer's art, and not to be treated frivolously. The reaction against the excessive and unmethodical capitalization of two centuries ago has itself been followed by something of a reaction in favor of the initial capital letter; and most effective that upper- case bit of type often proves as a mark of emphasis. But familiarity breeds contempt, and the reader ceases to be impressed as soon as the sprinkling of capitals turns into a steady down-pour. There is one use of the capital letter that has often seemed to us 310 [May 1, THE DIAL an abuse, though it has excited no general comment. In quoting a German word, of the noun-class, why should we feel obliged to conform invariably to the German rule and distinguish the word with a capital? It is well enough to write Kaiser and Konigreieh and Vaterland with large initials if one chooses; but when it comes to beirMeider and bleistift and tintenfass, they deserve no such distinction at our hands, whatever the practice of the Teuton. Con- trariwise, merely • because the French (and the library-school graduates) write their book-titles with only an initial capital, unless proper names occur, why should we discard the old and approved usage of capitals for all nouns and other important words in the title? Excessive economy — parsimony, in fact — in the use of upper-case letters has long marked the typography of a leading New England newspaper whose reputation is national. There is a story that when a new compositor on this paper asked what rule to follow in the use of capitals, he was instructed by a fellow-compositor to confine their use to the founder of Christianity and the founder of the paper. The journal in question indulges in such eccentricities as "Bunker hill," "Connecticut river," "New haven railroad company," "Standard oil trust," and " the social democrat party," and in a late issue made the surprising statement, "We have crossed the rubicon." A small river, in truth, is the Rubicon, but surely of sufficient importance in Roman history to deserve a large initial letter. In this matter, as in so many others, there is a reason- able middle way between the extremes of excess and abstinence which the trained taste should find it not hard to follow. "How to Live on Twenty-four Hours a Day" is the effective title of a little book by Mr. Arnold Bennett, written some years ago, but practically discovered in America in the wake of the recent popularity of "The Old Wives' Tale." Many of the characters in Mr. Bennett's novels are of the type that "muddle along " and call it living; and he understands with peculiar completeness the common- place person's attitude (or lack of attitude) toward life, — the sleepy, unthinking acquiescence in its conditions, dominated by a wish — not poignant enough to operate as a motive, but too strong to make real contentment possible — that he had "more time " for the things that count. "More time," says Mr. Bennett, is one of a very few things that nobody can get. You can neither buy, beg, nor lose your quota of time. No matter how shamefully you misuse one hour, another undeviatingly follows. The thing to do, then, is to cease wishing for the impos- sible, and to realize that if you work, let us say, eight hours, and sleep seven or eight, you still have eight or nine hours a day in which to live, with mind as well as body. In the little book above referred to, and in a similar collection of articles on "The Reasonable Life," Mr. Bennett makes trenchant suggestions on the vitalizing of dull, purposeless evenings, the utilizing of time spent in getting to and from work, the application to the quickening and development of the mind of the ideas that are rife nowadays about physical culture. He proposes no spectacular scheme of self-cultivation; "slow and sure" is his motto. But most of his readers will be perplexed indeed to know what becomes of those extra eight or nine hours, and will be inclined to try Borne of Mr. Bennett's simple expedients for filling one or two of them. Mr. Galsworthy's dramatic theme has always been justice to the under dog. Recently he has used "Justice " as the title of a play which, in grim sim- plicity of motive and action and in utter absence of stage conventions and dramatic "effects," is even less theatrical, if possible, than his three plays that have preceded it. The brief is strong just because it makes no pretension to being unassailable. Its unfolding has been followed with the tensest interest at the Repertory Theatre in London, and it is said that Mr. Winston Churchill, after listening atten- tively through a performance, immediately instituted several reforms in prison management suggested by the experiences of the hero, FaJder, who is "sent up " for three years for raising a cheque. He does raise the check, his motive being a desire to free a woman friend from the tyranny and abuse of a cruel husband. Whether he was at the moment crazed by love and worry, is the legal point at issue; the vital one being whether the law is justified,—for the boy's life is ruined, and incidentally the woman's, before justice has run its course. A fussy old bar- rister's clerk with a heart furnishes the humor, with- out which this "slice of life" would be unbearably grim. The very restrained style of the play is hard on the reader — and on the actor too, at the same time that it furnishes him with his great opportunity. • • • The power of the apt phrase can hardly be overestimated. The late Professor Sumner of Yale declared in his last book that "an educated man ought to be beyond the reach of suggestion from advertisements, newspapers, speeches, and stories." Nevertheless, a live man must and will react on his environment, and the seductions of clever adver- tisements, adroit headlines, persuasive speeches, and interesting stories must be resisted if they are not yielded to; they cannot leave an intelligendy alert person absolutely indifferent. Hence the pow- erful influence exerted by men who can put thoughts that breathe into words that burn. How many a man and woman has been moved to the expression, wise or unwise, of righteous indignation by that little phrase of Burke's " a limit at which forbearance ceases to be a virtue," or has been taught patience by that other phrase of his, "Custom reconciles us to everything"! "A wise and salutary neglect" has been the salvation of many young persons wholly ignorant of their debt to the coiner of the phrase. Franklin's assertion that "there never was a good war or a bad peace" has contributed, who knows how much, to international harmony, as his equally 1910.] 311 THE DIAL, famous saying that "in this world nothing is certain but death and taxes" has helped many of us to bear philosophically the vicissitudes of our lot. That there is a one best way, or supremely effective way, to state an important truth, who that has picked up a few of the immortal phrases of literature and of proverbial philosophy can doubt? • • • The steady demand for the favorite old books reveals an element of strength and perma- nency that is in encouraging contrast with the insatiate craving for the latest popular novelty in literature. Recent investigation has proved that, with the Bible and Shakespeare heading the list of constant sellers, Scott (especially his "Ivanhoe "), Hawthorne (" The Scarlet Letter" first and fore- most), Thackeray ("Vanity Fair" particularly), and Dickens (both in "Pickwick" and "David Copperfield "), are in large and unflagging demand. Lew Wallace's "Ben Hur" still appeals strongly to book-buyers, and is said, perhaps with some exag- geration, to bring in about forty thousand dollars a year to the author's family. Strikingly inferior is the popularity of both his earlier novel "The Fair God" and his later effort "The Prince of India." An encouraging symptom is the large public demand for the leading poets, Longfellow outdistancing all competitors in this country, with Whittier in second place. Tennyson and Browning also have each' a strong following, and the sale of FitzGerald's "Omar," since the expiration of copyright twenty years ago, has been such as would have struck the modest translator (or adaptor, rather) dumb with amazement. • • • The possibilities of the 'prentice pen are delightfully unrestricted. What new and epoch- making contribution the young writer shall make to literature, it rests with himself to determine. A striking proof of the young and unknown author's power to command attention, and to win sure reward for good work well done, was lately furnished in London, where a publisher, Mr. Andrew Melrose, had offered a handsome prize of two hundred and fifty guineas for the best novel submitted in open competition. One hundred and sixty manuscripts were offered, and were passed upon by three com- petent judges — Mrs. Flora Annie Steel, Miss Mary Cholmondeley, and Mrs. Henry de la Pasture; and the winning novel, " A Marriage under the Terror," is found to be a " first performance " as a novel, the writer, "Patricia Wentworth," having produced hitherto only short stories. Sanguine expectations of a brilliant success for "A Marriage under the Terror " are entertained. The printer's art as a branch of liberal culture, or at least of business education, is now made a subject of university instruction at Harvard. A course in the history of printing is offered in the Fine Arts department, and a course on the technique of printing is given in the recently established Busi- ness School. The materials and processes — paper, ink, type, printing machinery, and so on — are to be studied under the tuition of experts. An advanced course, including visits to various printing-houses, and exercises in preparation of copy, proof-reading, catalogue-making, and other details of printing and publishing, is also in prospect. If the art of printing can thus be restored to something like its dignity and importance in the days of the Elzevirs and the Aldines, possibly we may be consoled for the loss sustained in the process by Virgil and Cicero, Homer and Sophocles and Plato. Certainly it is a far cry from the Greek, Latin, and mathematics of the old-time college to the multitudinous and more or less "practical" courses and schools of the modern university. Of interest to Stratford visitors this sum- mer will be the forthcoming "Catalogue of the Books, Manuscripts, Works of Art, Antiquities, and Relics, at present exhibited in Shakespeare's Birthplace," issued by the trustees of said birthplace for the use of that large fraction of the touring public which yearly pays its tribute of curiosity and cash to the fa- mous town on the Avon. The catalogue is described as containing sixty-one illustrations of objects on exhibition, among them being facsimiles of Shake- speare signatures and of title-pages to early editions of his works, with occasional literary and historical annotations. COMM UNICA TION. PROFESSOR AGASSIZ AND THE CARNEGIE FUND. (To the Editor of Tub Dial.) I find on page 264 of your issue of April 16 a state- ment in regard to my lifelong friend Dr. Alexander Agassiz, which in justice to him and to the Carnegie Scientific Institution of Washington needs to be cor- rected. The statement is, in substance, that Agassiz was offered $75,000 for conducting some deep-sea soundings on condition that the enterprise should be known as the Carnegie-Agassiz Expedition, and that he declined the offer and found the money elsewhere. Together with Dr. John Billings, I spent a night with Mr. Agassiz and arranged that we should offer him $50,000 from the Carnegie Fund to enable us to place several men of science on his exploring vessel, who would carry on researches somewhat different from those in which he expected to be engaged. There was no condition made as to the name of the expedition, which was always mentioned in the papers of the Car- negie Scientific Institution as the " Agassiz Expedition," and never had associated with its title even the name Carnegie. Some time before the expedition started, Mr. Agassiz made up his mind that he preferred to carry on the expedition without assistance; and as it was so arranged, we of the Carnegie Institution took no part in his ven- ture. It is therefore not true that he was offered $75,000, and that he promptly declined; and untrue that any condition as to a name for the enterprise was attached to the offer of assistance. Weir Mitchell. Philadelphia, April 21, 1910. 312 [May 1, THE DIAL The "Hoosier Schoolmaster" Revealed.* Probably nearly every reader of " The Hoosier Schoolmaster " — that pioneer in a school of fic- tion that has had a numerous following, though none of the zealous imitators has yet imperilled the supremacy of the original model — has been inclined to regard the Schoolmaster's experiences as the more or less faithful autobiography of the writer. It is therefore likely to surprise many readers of Mr. George Cary Eggleston's " Recol- lections of a Varied Life" to learn that not Edward, but his younger brother George, the author of these " Recollections," was the School- master so well depicted in the novel. Edward Eggleston's feebleness of health debarred him from active pursuits and constrained him to turn, not unwillingly, to his pen as a means of sup- port; and it was his brother's pedagogic diffi- culties and triumphs at Riker's Ridge, in Indiana, that appealed to the novelist's fancy, and at a critical moment rescued from failure and bankruptcy that excellent old story-paper, "Hearth and Home." Sundry homely details characteristic of Hoosier life in the fifties, told with the convincing force of actual experience, are now added to the necessarily embroidered account of that life as given in the story. Mr. George Cary Eggleston calls himself, near the close of his volume, "an extempora- neous writer" — the sort of writer developed by the stress and strain of metropolitan jour- nalism; and his brisk narrative has all the excellences, and not many of the defects, of the trained journalist. The reader is spared all introductory or genealogical matter, and all that is of a family nature or of interest chiefly to the writer himself. Plunging into the midst of things, Mr. Eggleston tells us, rapidly and effectively, what sort of a life he has led since his birth at Vevay, Indiana, seventy years ago, and what kind of persons, celebrated or obscure, he has had intercourse with in his varied, and, for a man of letters, rather eventful, course. His family is of Virginia extraction, and in the Old Dominion he himself passed a few of his adolescent years and received the latter part of his academic training. His enthusiasm for things and persons Virginian, well known to readers of his romances, finds additional warm expression in these retrospections, wherein also •Recollections of a Varied Life. By George Cary Eggleston. New York: Henry Holt & Co. he not unnaturally deplores the passing of the old order, the displacement of the Southern planter by the Yankee farmer, and the invasion of the cotton-mill and all the unloveliness of factory life where once were to be enjoyed the courtliness and the leisure of the broad-acred Virginia plantation. So warmly did the young Eggleston espouse the cause of his adopted State that when the Civil War broke out there seems not to have been the slightest hesitation on his part which side of the quarrel to make his own. Enlisting early and serving to the end, the young caval- ryman evidently found his life in the field much to his taste; at least he treats us to very little of the horrors of war, but to not a few agree- able pictures of the freedom and adventure he enjoyed during those four years of campaigning. Of his life in general in the South, and of the peculiar virtues of Southerners, he has much to say which, in its warmth of eulogy, taxes the reader's credulity. But he earnestly protests that he is not exaggerating, and it is certainly far pleasanter to believe than to doubt him. He must, however, have been placed in somewhat exceptional surroundings if one may judge from such passages as the following. "Both the young men and the young women read voluminously — the young men in part, perhaps, to equip themselves for conversational intercourse with the young women They both read polite literature, but they read history also with a diligence that equipped them with independent convictions of their own, with regard to such matters as the conduct of Charlotte Corday, the characters of Mirabeau, Dan ton, and Robespierre, the ungentlemanly treatment given by John Knox to Mary Queen of Scots, and all that sort of thing. Indeed, among the Virginia women, young and old, the romantic episodes of history, ancient, medueval, and modern, completely took the place, as subjects of conversation, of those gossipy personalities that make up the staple of conversation among women generally." Soon after the close of the war, young Mr. Eggleston removed to Illinois, and thence to Mississippi, where he began and ended his brief and unstimulating experience of the law as a profession. Forsaking this, "in the profoundest disgust," for journalism, and for literature in a wider sense, he betook himself, with wife and child, to New York and secured work as a reporter on the Brooklyn "Union," of which Theodore Tilton was then editor, having recently left "The Independent." The enterprise and what he himself calls the "cheek" of the would-be journalist are illustrated by his very first con- tribution to his newspaper. While waiting for his first assignment he wrote an article and sent it in to Mr. Tilton, who liked it and printed it 1910.] 313 THE DIAL as a "leader." Throughout Mr. Eggleston's "varied life," he has manifestly had a happy faculty for landing always on his feet and for making a success of whatever he has undertaken. He says of himself that he has always been "intensely in earnest," and that may help to explain his unfailing effectiveness in any activity claiming his attention. Among the many famous men, chiefly men of letters, with whom Mr. Eggleston has had deal- ings, professional or friendly, Bryant is one whom we are glad to be made better acquainted with from the personal anecdotes of the great editor's assistant on the "Evening Post." Con- troverting Lowell's commonly-accepted descrip- tion of him in "A Fable for Critics," where he appears as cold and unresponsive by nature, Mr. Eggleston says: "The lack of warmth usually attributed to Mr. Bryant I found to be nothing more than the personal reserve common to New Knglanders of culture and refinement, plus an excessive personal modesty and a shyness of self-revelation and self-intrusion which is usually found only in young girls just budding into womanhood. Mr. Bryant shrank from self-assertion even of the most impersonal sort, as I never knew any other human being to do. He cherished his own opin- ions strongly, but he thrust them upon nobody. His dignity was precious to him, but his only way of assert- ing it was by withdrawal from any conversation or com- pany that trespassed upon it. Above all, emotion was a sacred thing, not to be exploited or even revealed. In ordinary intercourse with his fellow-men he hid it away as one instinctively hides the privacies of the toilet. He could no more lay his feelings bare to common scrutiny than he could have taken his bath in the presence of company. In the intimate talks he and I had together during the last half-dozen years of his life, he laid aside his reserve, so far as it was possible for a man of his sensitive nature to do, and I found him not only warm in his human sympathies, but even passionate." Mr. Eggleston's long experience as literary editor gives weight to his opinion in matters of literary ethics. His judgment concerning anonymity in literary criticism is apparently reflected in what he quotes from Bryant under this head. "I regard an anonymous literary criticism," said the poet on one occasion to Mr. Eggleston, "as a thing quite as despicable, unmanly, and cowardly as an anonymous letter. It is something that no honorable man should write, and no honorably conducted newspaper should publish." It is true that most of the reviews in the "Post" were unsigned in Bryant's day (as now), but he maintained that in letting it be generally known who was the literary editor of that journal he had removed the stigma of anonymity from them. As Mr. Eggleston devotes most of his chap- ters to those early days of young hope and boundless possibilities with which he entered on his life-work, there is no lack of stimulus and freshness in his pages. In writing his first book, a manual entitled " How to Educate Yourself," for "Putnam's Handy Book Series," he says that he had the advantage of comparative youth and of that self-confident omniscience which only youth can have. "I knew everything then," he continues, "better than I know any- thing now, so much better, indeed, that for a score of years past I have not dared open the little book, lest it rebuke my present ignorance beyond my capacity to endure." The account of his early good-fortune in being solicited to write "A Rebel's Recollections" for "The Atlantic," and of the genesis of various other works from his pen, with the record of his busy life as a journalist in New York, is full of interest. The chapters are short, and the reader's attention is gladly given to their brisk recital of incident and anecdote. The writer's brief closing description of his working habits is likely to be of help to young followers of lit- erature or journalism. The " extemporaneous" element in the book, while freeing it from any evidence of labor, any smell of the lamp, betrays itself less admirably in an occasional mark of carelessness, as in the use of compte as the French form of count, and in the neither French nor English seigniors. There are no pictures in the volume, not even a frontispiece portrait of the author. Something of Bryant's " shyness of self-revelation and self-intrusion " has indeed been shown by Mr. Eggleston in this respect as in others ; and who shall say his book is not all the better for it? Percy F. Bicknell. Some English Romantic Poets.* Current essays in literary criticism are numer- ous enough, but it is a rare volume which really takes its readers further along than they were before. It is therefore with pleasure that we take account of Mr. Arthur Symons's sub- stantial volume of criticism on certain British poets who in their time contributed to the modern development of natural feeling and the feeling for nature in English poetry. It is a book over which the discerning reader will felicitate himself as he reads, and the literary student — even though a critic — grow decor- ously enthusiastic as he writes. There are, of course, spots upon which criti- * The Romantic Movement in English Poetbt. By Arthur Symons. New York: E. P. Dutton and Co. 314 [May 1, THE DIAL cism may light. There is, first of all, a disap- pointment in store for those who take the volume in hand with expectations naturally aroused by the title. The book is not a treatise upon the Romantic Movement at all. In his preface the author explains that he does not use the term in its usual historical sense. There is, from his point of view, nothing in this development of English poetry so definite as a conscious " move- ment." In the Tractarian Movement, for exam- ple, there was a definite aim which set many minds working together. "No such thing ever happened in the creation of literature." These romanticists among the poets were comrades, to be sure, but not colleagues; they should there- fore be studied as individuals. And so in the bulk of the volume we find a collection of criti- cal estimates in which some eighty or ninety versifiers are considered in chronological order, and in which a valuation is placed upon their work. A brief Introduction, of less than twenty pages, contains all that Mr. Symons cares to say about what we usually term the Romantic Movement; and here he defines the phrase as meaning " simply the reawakening of the imag- ination, a reawakening to a sense of beauty and strangeness in natural things, and in all the im- pulses of the mind and senses. That reawaken- ing was not always a conscious one." Nor will the plan of selection adopted by the critic in his choice of poets for consideration com- mend itself to everyone. No method of limitation could be more arbitrary. The year 1800 is fixed upon as a centre for Mr. Symons's chronological compasses, and the sweep of his instrument in- cludes all the romantic poets who, born previous to that year, survived it. As fate arranged, there- fore, it is John Home (1722-1808) who heads the list of these romanticists, since he chanced to be the oldest British versifier who survived the century; and it is Thomas Hood (1799-1845) who closes the list, because, apparently, no other romantic poet claims the closing year of the century as that of his birth. However, it is for Mr. Symons to write of whom he pleases, and it is hardly worth while to quarrel with him for thus excluding from his pages the earlier leaders in the movement — Gray, Cowper, Thomson, and Burns. Of Burns, to be sure, the author does have a few suggestive words to say in his Introduction, but he gives no adequate study of the Scotch poet. Quibbling aside, there is abundance of inter- esting material in these pages. It is worth while, perhaps, just to have one's memory refreshed regarding the significance of those half-forgotten if not altogether unknown names. Who was John Home, for example? Little of his work has survived his own day, yet two lines in his play of " Douglas " were familiar to us when we were schoolboys: "My name is Norval; on the Grampion Hills My father feeds his flocks; a frugal swain." And here appears Dr. Erasmus Darwin (1731- 1802), physician, natural philosopher,and didac- tic poet, the distinguished grandsire of the more distinguished Charles; with his "Loves of the Plants " and his " Temple of Nature," in whom Imagination mated with Science, producing some strange results. Describing a statue of Lot's wife in the salt-mines of Cracow, he notes: "Cold dews condense upon her pearly hreast, And the hig tear rolls lucid down her vest." John Wolcott (1735-1803) follows, more easily recognized under the pen-name of " Peter Pindar " — with his "desultory way of writing, A hop and step and jump way of inditing." William Combe (1741-1823) is another writer whose name rests upon the memory with less weight than that of "Dr. Syntax," the pseu- donym under which he wrote. It now occurs to us that in our youth we curiously studied over two or three volumes of Dr. Syntax's "Tours," but it is a surprise to learn that this gentleman was the author of some eighty publi- cations, of which none has really survived. If the names already cited are unfamiliar, those of a little group of women contemporary with these men are still alive. Here are Mrs. Barbauld and Joanna Baillie; and Hannah More, of pious memory, whose sacred dramas, we are assured, are "still readable on a dull afternoon." It may well be that few now read the verses which these ladies wrote; but this can hardly be said of Carolina, Lady Nairne (1766- 1845), whose lilting songs — "The Laird of Cockpen," "Caller Herrin'," and "The Land o' the Leal" — make their appeal to-day as freshly as when first written. It was Lady Nairne, by the way, whose "admiration of Burns showed itself in the desire to publish a ' purified' edition of his songs"; but whose practical good sense led her to see that some of the ploughman's best poems "wouldn't be purified," and finally to abandon the scheme. There is an interesting note upon the two sisters, Ann and Jane Taylor, joint authors of "Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star," which contains the following comment. It will strike an American ear oddly enough. "The talents of Jane were more considerable than those of Ann. She is something what Longfellow would like to have been; but her art is far above his." 1910.] 315 THE DIAL, There is not much space for personal history in these severely condensed paragraphs of critical comment, but Mr. Symons has found room here and there for a few details. The reader is often touched by their pathos. There was Robert Bloomfield, a country boy, and afterward a tailor in a London garret. There he wrote rural tales, ballads, and nature poems; thirty thousand copies of "The Farmer's Boy" were sold in three years; he was lionized and patronized, and then left to die in poverty. "Had he lived longer he would probably have gone mad." Robert Tannahill worked at a loom in Paisley all his life, making his songs as he worked, bike Hans Sachs on his cobbler's bench. He went "melancholy-mad," burned his manuscripts, and drowned himself in the river. George Beattie, the crofter's son, who wrote much about" grisly ghaists " and " whinnering goblins," shot himself because of disappointment in love. On the other hand, there was the experience of William Nicholson, son of a Galloway carrier, who be- came a peddler, printed his own poems and took them about in his pack. "He went to fairs as singer and piper; then took to drink, and a new gospel which he wanted to preach to the King; but, coming back unsatisfied, became a drover." Most romantic of all, perhaps, was the career of James Hogg, " the Ettrick Shepherd," who began at seven by herding cows on the hills of Selkirk. At twenty he could not write the alphabet; but at twenty-six he began to make up verses in his head. Having heard "Tam O'Shanter" recited by a half-daft person, he resolved to be a poet and to fill Burns's place in the world. And he did become a poet — a poet of such pretensions that Mr. Symons de- votes ten pages of comment to his work. The general reader of this book will turn with natural interest to those sections which deal with the greater poets — Wordsworth, Scott, Cole- ridge, Byron, Shelley, and Keats. And here Mr. Symons's critical strength is most forcibly recog- nized. His discussion of Wordsworth's poetical quality is one of the best that has been written. "Sincerity was at the root of all Wordsworth's merits and defects; it gave him his unapproachable fidelity to nature; and also his intolerable fidelity to his own whims. Like Emerson, whom he so often resembled, he respected all intuitions; but, unlike Emerson, did not always distinguish between a whim and an intuition." Such is the critic's point of view as indicated at the beginning of the section. In his criticism of individual poems, therefore, he consistently deprecates the "Laodamia" as "an attempt to be classic." "Here Wordsworth would be Greek as the Greeks were, or rather as they seem to us, at our distance from them, to be; and it is only in single lines that he suc- ceeds, all the rest of the poem showing an effort to be something not himself. Thus this profoundly natural poet becomes for once, as Matthew Arnold has noted, 'artificial' in a poem which has been classed among his masterpieces." It is interesting to find that Mr. Symons him- self considers "The Leech-Gatherer " (0^'Reso- lution and Independence ") to be Wordsworth's "greatest, as it is certainly his most charac- teristic," poem. This assertion, while perhaps unconventional, is altogether consistent, and to many a lover of that realistic, homely, yet eloquent parable, it is exceedingly gratifying. Ideally characteristic of the poet this composi- tion surely is; among the compositions typical of Wordsworth, which other is more admirable than this? Of Scott, the critic says: "The novelist died . . . in 1825; but the poet committed suicide, with Harold the Dauntless, in 1817." For Sir Walter's poetry he has no admiration and scant patience. "Scott's verse [his long poems] is written for boys, and boys, generation after generation, will love it with the same freshness of response . . . Byron usually fol- lows Scott in the boy's head, and drives out Scott, as that infinitely greater, though imperfect, force may well do. Shelley often completes the disillusion. But it is well, perhaps, that there should be a poet for boys, and for those grown-up people who are most like boys; for those, that is, to whom poetry appeals by something in it which is not the poetry." Byron, he declares " has power without wisdom, power which is sanity, and human at heart, but without that vision which is wisdom." Byron's ennui "was made up of many elements, but it was partly of that most incurable kind which comes from emptiness rather than over-fulness; the ennui of one to whom thought was not sat- isfying, without sustenance in itself, but itself a cause of restlessness, like a heady wine drunk in solitude." In writing of Shelley, Mr. Symons says: "There are two kinds of imagination, that which embodies and that which disembodies. Shelley's is that which disembodies, filling mortal things with unearthly essences or veiling them with unearthly raiment. Words- worth's imagination embodies, concentrating spirit into man, and nature into a wild flower." Keats is described as the artist "to whom art is more than life, and who, if he realises that 'Beauty is Truth, Truth Beauty,' loves truth for being beautiful and not beauty for its inner- most soul of spiritual truth." These passages are fairly illustrative of our author's critical attitude. His comments are 316 [May 1, THE DIAL incisive, sound, and stimulating. Originality of view and definiteness of judgment are stamped on every dictum. It is not necessary to add that Mr. Symons writes with the pen of a literary artist, but it is proper to say that half the pleasure derived from the book is due to this fact. Felicitous phrases and terse epigrams brighten the paragraphs and illuminate the criticism. "Thus, Setebos, storming because Mephistopheles Gave him the lie, Said he'd 'blacken his eye,' And dashed in his face a whole cup of hot coffee-lees." This illustrates what Mr. Symons terms the "cascading of cadences" in "The Ingoldsby Legends." In describing the songs of Tanna- hill, he speaks of "that almost inarticulate jingle and twinkle which goes with the genuine gallop of the Scottish tongue." "Pope," he says, " is the most finished artist in prose who ever wrote in verse." Again: "Where other poets use reality as a spring-board into space, Blake uses it as a foothold on his return from flight." This is indeed a book which reflects the posi- tive personality of a brilliant mind. It is not without eccentricities of opinion, nor are its judgments infallible; but it is a volume thor- oughly worth while. It really takes its reader further on. W- E. Simonds. A Classic of Biological Literature.* In 1900 appeared the introductory part of the first volume of the original German edition of Hugo De Vries's mutationstheorie. This work has recently been translated into English with the title, " The Mutation Theory: Experiments and Observations on the Origin of Species in the Vegetable Kingdom." Volume I., "The Origin of Species by Mutation," has already been issued. If not epoch-making, this work in the original edition was at least epoch-marking. In conjunction with the then recently rediscov- ered work of the Austrian monk, Gregor Mendel, regarding the method by which characters are inherited, the ideas of De Vries served to stimu- late investigators all over the world to undertake experimental studies of the basic problems of organic evolution. No period of anything like equal length in the history of biology has * The Mutation Theory: Experiments and Observa- tions on the Origin of Species in the Vegetable Kingdom. By Hugo De Vries. In two volumes, translated by J. B. Farmer and A. D. Darbishere. Volume I., Origin of Species by Mutation. Chicago: The Open Court Publishing Co. approached the last decade in respect to the quantity of reliable experimental data collected regarding the factors of evolution and their operation. The Darwinian and neo-Darwinian schools of evolutionary thought, in the very na- ture of the case, did not stimulate experimental lines of investigation. Their teaching was that the progressive changes of organic structure and function which we call evolution are things which proceed by the slow and gradual accumulation of exceedingly minute variations by a process of natural selection. But if it takes centuries to make any definite progress in evolution, what chance might a graduate student yearning for a doctorate, or a university instructor struggling for an increase in salary and rank, be supposed to have of getting anywhere in an experimental study of evolution? Vita brevis est; and one was much surer of " results" by embarking upon a speculative discussion of the relation of exist- ing animals and plants to hypothetical primitive forms, assumed to have been acted upon by a hypothetical environment, or some similar sub- ject. To De Vries, perhaps more than to any other man, is due the credit of having brought about an entire change of the prevailing viewpoint in regard to the study of evolution. He saw clearly that the only way to get the investigation of evolution out of the slough of metaphysical despond in which it had so long floundered was precisely by the application of the experimental method to its problems. Through a long period of years he carried on a most brilliant and thor- ough experimental investigation aimed at the determination of how new varieties and species are as a matter of fact actually produced. The results of this investigation are embodied in the book under review. It is a substantial and enduring work of reference, rather than a popu- lar treatise. Its place in the library is beside Darwin's "Origin" and " Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication." The first volume of " The Mutation Theory" is divided into two parts. The first part is occu- pied with a critical review of current theories of evolution, particularly those relating to the effect of selection. This is followed by a pre- sentation of the author's theory of the origin of species by mutation. Part II. contains the detailed account of De Vries's experiments and observations regarding the production of new elementary species in the evening primrose (Oenothera). The general result of this work is to demonstrate that new species have arisen in this genius suddenly by the appearance of a new 1910.] 317 THE DIAL form which thereafter breeds true, and does not revert to the parent form. This process is called mutation, by the author. It is contended that evolution in general has proceeded by such dis- continuous steps, rather than by the gradual accumulation of minute variations. De Vries makes no denial of the importance of natural selection, but believes that its chief function is not to create, but rather to determine which mutations shall survive in the struggle for exis- tence. The limitations of the Mutation Theory as a general theory of Evolution must be settled by future investigation; but there can be no doubt that this masterly work of De Vries's will long rank as a classic of biological literature. Raymond Pearl. An American Soldier and Mystic* A remarkable character is revealed in the Diary of General Ethan Allen Hitchcock, extracts from which have been edited by the veteran author and journalist W. A. Croffut, and published under the title " Fifty Years in Camp and Field." The Diary covers almost the whole of the active life of General Hitch- cock. It was begun soon after his graduation from West Point in 1817, and the last entry was made more than fifty years later. It gives information upon Hitchcock's life while in- structor and commandant at West Point, where he trained many of the prominent Civil War generals; upon his services on the Western frontier, in the Seminole Wars in Florida, and in the Mexican and Civil Wars. The work is not only a source of information about Hitch- cock himself, but a side-light thrown upon the public matters and policies of the time. The editor tells us that the hundreds of volumes of the Diary are filled mainly with Hitchcock's notes on his reading and with his own philo- sophical reflections, while only slight space is given to the details of his army life. However, somewhat more is said in the Diary about public questions of the day. In selecting material for publication the editor has omitted all except the most striking of the philosophical reflections, and has printed the more interesting personal notes and the comments on public matters and men. The Diary discloses an interesting character— a soldier well read in all the branches of litera- • Fifty Years in Camp and Field. Diary of Major- General Ethan Allen Hitchcock, U.S.A. Edited by W. A. Croffut, Ph.D. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons. ture, philosophy, and science; a scholar who was an accomplished military organizer and execu- tive; a philosopher of inquisitive mind, who, while he sat in courts-martial, inspected armies, or commanded districts," took more pleasure in the infinite than in the finite, in metaphysics than in physics, in the occult than in the obvious." But it was chiefly as a soldier that the world knew General Hitchcock. He tells us that he went into the military profession, not because he was attracted to it, but because his people thought it to be the proper vocation for the grandson of the hero of Ticonderoga. Yet he was one of the most accomplished of American soldiers, as the positions held by him indicate. And probably no other good soldier was ever quite so independent in speech and with pen, so nearly insubordinate at times. The entries in the Diary show that he was a frequent " protest- ant" against the rulings or policies of command- ing officers, of the War Department, and of the President. And his protests were usually effec- tive. At times he must have been very trouble- some. The Diary mentions a dozen instances of issues between Hitchcock and some superior authority. He was sent by the West Point authorities to protest against President Andrew Jackson's interference with the discipline of cadets, and he roundly scolded " Old Hickory." He openly said that the Seminole Indians were cruelly treated, defrauded, and lied to by the government officials, and insisted that only a policy of conciliation would succeed in pacifying Florida, that he " never did believe in Harney's method of dealing with Indians — to hang them wherever they were found—but in friendly over- tures." In Florida he was finally given leave to try his plan; and it succeeded. In the West he made much trouble for the politicians, but saved the Winnebagoes and the Cherokees from being defrauded and despoiled. General Hitchcock read aright the signs of American expansion in the Southwest. As early as 1836 he predicted the annexation of Texas, the war with Mexico, and a later disso- lution of the Union. He condemned both the Texan War and the Mexican War as being caused by American greed for land. Stationed, in 1836, on the Texan frontier, he came to the conclusion that the Texan War for indepen- dence was only a land-grabbing movement inspired from Washington. His Diary relates the story of the solitary individual who was making his way with long strides across Ken- tucky, with long rifle on shoulder and bullets in his belt. Someone asked him, " Where are 318 [May 1, THE DIAL, you going?" "To Texas." "What for?" »'To fight for my rights." In Hitchcock's opinion, most "rights" on the Texan frontier were of this kind. In his note-books he recorded: "I am puzzled what to do. I regard the whole of the proceedings in the Southwest as being wicked as far as the United States are concerned. Our people have provoked the war [1836] with Mexico, and are prosecuting it not for 'liberty' but for land. And I feel averse to being an instrument for these purposes. "Our people ought to be damned for their impudent arrogance and domineering presumption! It is enough to make atheists of us all to see such wickedness in the world, whether punished or unpunished. "We have certain intelligence that J. K. Polk is elected President over Henry Clay. ... I look upon this as a step toward annexation of Texas first, and then, in due time, the separation of the Union." He criticized the government for the policy leading up to the Mexican War, for claiming the Bio Grande as the boundary, and for its treatment of Scott and Taylor; but when the war actually began he took a prominent part in it, and became so interested that he quit read- ing and writing philosophy — the first time and the last time that such a thing happened in his life. As an historical document, the Diary is of most value for the light it will give the future historians of the Mexican War. It is a genuine inside view. The comments and information about Taylor, Scott, and other generals, about the battles and the campaigns of the war, the conditions in Mexico and the politics in the army, will be worth much to the investigator in this unpromising field. It is here, too, that the Diary is fullest. For the Civil War period it is less valuable. There are some good things about the political methods of the War Depart- ment, and some sharp criticism of the confused military policies that were evolved at Washing- ton by civilians. Of Secretary Stanton, Hitch- cock recorded this opinion: "He has no general principles of action. He decides a point one way one day, and a week later, forgetting his decision and having no definite principles to go by, he decides the same point another way. He authorizes a particular proceeding, and, within a week perhaps, the circumstances being exactly the same, he flies into a passion with someone for having followed his first decision." Here and there throughout the book we gain glimpses of Hitchcock's peculiar personality. He mentions "my abomination—a card-table"; when others were drinking, he retired to his room "and thought about infinity"; at Fort Jesup, when the officers had the choice of attending a horse-race or going to a gander- pulling, Hitchcock "took up the Meditations Marcus Aurelius Antoninus, that heathen of Spinoza." He did not swear, he read much, he was quiet; he liked music extravagantly, and played on the flute. It is easy to see that with the generally uncultured officers of the twenties and thirties he could not be a favorite. Under date of February 16,1835, he gives this glimpse of life at an army outpost. "I am in a peculiar situation here. I do not wish to depreciate the merits of my brother officers, but it is certain that their habits if not their tastes are differ- ent from mine, and, while a majority of them congre- gate and either play cards or smoke or drink or all three together, I am left in solitude or compelled to choose between those resorts and the company of the few ladies there are at the Prairie. ... I am certainly out of place here. My life is calculated to make me an object of envy and hate to most of those around men. In the first place, I do not join in any of the vices of the garrison — not one. I neither drink, play cards, nor even indulge in the smallest license of lan- guage. Next, I am disposed to literature, and some- times indicate that I read or think; and it is mostly in a field unexplored by others. I visit the ladies, and am almost the only officer who does visit the ladies; and this is calculated to move to jealousy." But as the quality of the army officers improved, Hitchcock became more reconciled, and even found a few congenial spirits who preferred Plato and Spinoza to gambling and drinking. Like his grandfather, Hitchcock was an inde- pendent thinker about matters of religion. Soon after finishing his West Point course, he began his philosophical studies. He explained in his Diary that, having begun to doubt the stories of Jonah and Balaam's Ass, he endeavored to find out "what a certain class of men called philo- sophers thought of God and man and life." Thenceforward philosophy was his religion,— "a faith freed," he said, " from the gross super- stitions which give so many religions of the world a forbidding aspect." He kept standing orders for works on philosophy with booksellers in the United States and London, and he read all that could be had on the subject. Wherever he went he carried his books, until he reached California, when he sold them to the City of San Francisco to form the beginning of the present Mercantile Library. A typical entry in his Diary says: "My box of books has come — nearf 200 worth, including Behman, Cudworth, Napier, Niebuhr's Rome, Scaliger, Bentham, Strauss, and the Bhagavat Gita." In his old age he became interested in the works of the alchemists and in the hermetic philosophy which would find hidden meanings in mediaeval writings. During the Civil War he published several books on the hermetic philosophy. Of all the philosophers, he was most impressed by Spinoza, 1910.] 319 THE DIAL "that God-intoxicated man." Hitchcock him- self was Spinoza-intoxicated. He had editions of Spinoza's Ethics in French, German, and Latin, in addition to five manuscript copies in English, three of which he had made himself. Yet he " still felt a want," and made another translation. "I find myself more in harmony with Spinoza," he wrote, "than with any other man, dead or alive." And Philosophy was to him "the first and foremost blessing in the world." Walter L. Fleming. Chicago Before the Fire.» Chicagoans who have memories long enough to be worth mentioning relate most of their recollections to the year of the Great Fire. The year 1871 is our A. U. C; local history since that date has an orderly and documented development, while the happenings of earlier days have a legendary tinge and seem so im- mensely remote that we almost wonder if they ever could have been true. The city that we know is a palimpsest, and the older record has become so completely obliterated that its recon- struction, even in imperfect form, involves toil- some effort and difficult mental readjustment. Yet the span is a brief one, as history reckons; and even The Dial, with its thirty-year period this day rounded out, covers it by more than three-fourths. Holding to the past by this and other bonds, we have to go back only a few years further to penetrate the mists of the years which antedate the Fire, and enter into the spirit of the city's adolescent period. The retrospective venture is now prompted by Mr. Frederick Francis Cook's "Bygone Days in Chicago," a book of compelling interest to those of us who believe that we are citizens of no mean city, and who receive these greetings from the past, rich in their power to evoke long-slumbering memories, with feelings that are quite beyond adequate description. Mr. Cook, now for many years a resident of another city, came to Chicago in 1862, and was an old-time newspaper reporter in the service of our four leading dailies — "The Tribune," » The Times," » The Journal," and « The Post." He was a well-equipped journalist, who was brought close to the heart of many important matters and interests, and has preserved an extraordinarily vivid memory of his experiences. •Bygone Days in Chicago. Recollections of the "Garden City of the Sixties." By Frederick Francis Cook. Illustrated. Chicago: A. C. McClnrg & Co. He tells his story in a simple and straightfor- ward manner, and supplements it by something like a hundred reproductions of rare prints and photographs, mostly found in the collections of the Chicago Historical Society. His aim, stated in his own words, has been "To shed what light may be his on the psychology of a staid yet surcharged period, now difficult for those who were not of it to realize; rebuild for the mind's eye a vanished city; restore to its streets their varied life; rehabilitate past types in their proper setting; recall with a due regard for values some of the moving events of a memorable epoch; and so provide a faithful tran- script for whomsoever may be interested in the 'Garden City' of a classic past, or a somewhat unique social integral, or feel moved to re-people it in fancy with the offspring of his imagination." The spirit which has animated him in this en- deavor is thus finely expressed: "Chicago is to the unthinking a synonyme for Ma- terialism. Yet, of a truth, she is a very Mother of Idealism. Unfortunately, she cannot yet hold all she nurtures, nor always realize the visions she inspires. For the present, therefore, she must needs content her- self with the role of prolific matrix, whose issue on occasion answers the beckoning of older centres, in the hope of a fuller expression — not, however, always realized." Both in the letter of historical fact, and in the spirit above set forth, Mr. Cook has accom- plished his task with admirable success, and deserved the gratitude of the younger genera- tion for which he has chiefly written. It is in its constant forcing of comparisons between past and present that this book achieves its most striking effects. These comparisons are usually implied rather than expressed, but they are soon present in the consciousness as we read. What a suggestion there is in the very name " Garden City"! For there was a time when Chicago had more gardens than slums — when Prairie Avenue really led straight to the prairies, and when Cottage Grove (now how fallen from its beautiful primitive estate I) was in very truth an oak grove in which cottages nestled, cottages that sheltered simple house- holds that are hardly imaginable in the " flats" that are now crowded and piled in those erst- while liberal spaces. In those days, Kankakee Avenue was the road to Kankakee, and not to the South Park; Blue Island Avenue was the road to Blue Island, and not to the Slavonic quarter of our modern hive; and residents of the North Side could start from their very doors to journey upon the Green Bay Road. In those days, Clark Street really recalled to those who used it the heroic deeds of George Rogers Clark, and Wells Street the little garrison that marched from Fort Dearborn to its tragic fate among 320 [May 1, THE DIAL the dunes along the lake shore, and Clinton Street the creator of the Erie Canal that had made early Chicago possible and was to make Illinois one of the stanchest of the common- wealths that defended the Union in the great struggle against slavery. The descendants of the men who then walked those streets now think little of the names and their significance; is it not something of a question whether the old thoughts have been replaced by new ones as worthy? "Probably no event in Chicago's history up to the time of the Fire was so much talked about all over the West, and so variously com- mented upon." The average older Chicagoan would have to guess many times before hitting upon the occurrence thus referred to; and for the Chicagoan under sixty, guessing would be useless. The reference is to the cleaning out of the "North Side Sands" under the orders of "Long John" Wentworth, then mayor of Chicago. "The scene of the episode was an isolated sand bar- ren, on the bleak North Shore, with Michigan Street for its centre. It was the fashion in the rough-and-ready volunteer fire department days for the 'authorities' to give the men that 'ran wid de masheen' and worked the brakes, on one pretext or another, a 'time,' — by making them instruments of 'moral regeneration.' . . . Here was an assemblage of rookeries, none above two stories in height, and very easily demolished. The brute in the average man was far greater in those days than now. There were no doubt many estimable citizens con- nected with some of the fire companies, for they were of many degrees, including one or two regarded as quite 'tony.' But others were mere 'fighting' organizations, with small reference to fires; and sometimes one would get so demoralized as to call for disbandment. Thus it was men in many instances in no wise above the level of their victims, who in a riotous enthusiasm drove these bedraggled outcasts from their shelter, and forced them to seek refuge where none was obtainable Yet this exhibition of barbarism in the name of high morality set 'Long John' apart in the estimation of 'good and pious people,' as the defender of the home and an apostle of purity; while to the 'men about town' it furnished a theme to dramatize" The result of this raid was to drive vice into South Side quarters, where it became a greater menace to decency than it had been before. But some lessons are never learned, and the zeal of our present-day " reformers" is misdirected in much the same way. A large section of this book is devoted to war-time memories, and deals with such inter- esting matters as the raising of troops, the history of Camp Douglas, the closing of the "Times " office by order of General Burnside, the partisan alignment of the foreign popula- tion, and the strife between copperheads and loyalists. The following passage illustrates the sectional sympathies of the city during the course of the conflict. "With the exception of a considerable Southern-born admixture, the native population was in the main loyal to the Union side, while the foreign-born population was divided into opposite camps, with an appreciable preponderance of numbers on the Irish side. Whereas the North Division with its dominant German popula- tion, and the Milwaukee Avenue region with its Scandi- navian beginnings, were ever enthusiastic for the Union and the abolition of slavery, all that region which lies between Archer and Blue Island Avenues (excepting a German cluster about Twelfth and Halsted Streets) was never more than lukewarm, and on occasion dis- tinctly hostile to the prosecution of the war. Whenever there was a notable Union victory, the North Side would burst spontaneously into a furor of enthusiasm, while matters down in the densely populated southwest region would be reduced to a mere simmer. But no sooner was there a Rebel victory than it was the turn of Bridge- port and its appanages to celebrate; and these demon- strations generally took the form of hunting down any poor colored brother who might have strayed inadvert- ently within those delectable precincts." "Old Abe," the famous war eagle of the Eighth Wisconsin regiment, was on exhibition in Chi- cago at the first Sanitary Fair. The eagle "made it plain that he had but a poor opinion of his surroundings — that he missed the bugle call and the roar of battle. Then it happened one day that a noted war orator in attendance was called on for a speech. No sooner had he got well started than 'Old Abe' rose on his perch, flapped his wings, and evidently mistaking what he heard for the familiar, terror-inspiring ' Rebel yell', screeched a wild defiance. This is probably the only instance when an orator in very fact made the American eagle scream." The Copperheads come in for much comment, illustrative quotation, and personal portraiture. One of them is thus characterized: "I am firmly persuaded that immovable Jacksouian Democrat (and a very Old Hickory, too, in appearance), dear old Dr. N. S. Davis, opposed the war on grounds of constitutional construction and none other: for, being a York State man, he had no controlling Southern family affiliations. The good doctor lived long enough to be well remembered by a later generation, and few in Chicago have died in greater honor. But in his virile manhood he was a chronic storm centre; and it was only because he was so much besides a Copperhead that his so frequently ill-timed 'constitutional' fulminations met with toleration." A few brief quotations will show to what lengths the Copperhead orator was willing to go in those days of high feeling. "Abraham Lincoln has deluged the country with blood, created a debt of four thousand million dollars, and sacrificed two millions of human lives. At the November election we will damn him with eternal infamy." "We want to try Lincoln as Charles I. of England was tried, and if found guilty will carry out the law." "If I am called upon to elect between the freedom 1910.] 321 THE DIAL of the nigger and disunion and separation, I shall choose the latter. You might search hell over and find none worse than Abraham Lincoln." "We have patiently waited for a change, but for four years have lived under a despotism, and the wonder is that men carry out the orders of the gorilla tyrant who has usurped the presidential chair." "Still the monster usurper wants more victims for his slaughter pens. I blush that such a felon should occupy the highest gift of the people. Perjury and larceny are written all over him." These pleasant observations, made in a spirit of such delicate amenity, make the campaign of 1864 seem a lively affair. We may think we get excited in a modern presidential year, but we do not work ourselves up to that pitch of frenzy. Mr. Cook quotes Taine's saying, " Let me once frame the true psychology of a Jacobin, and my book is written." His own effort is to frame the psychology of the Copperhead, and his conclusion is "that among the Democratic masses of the north, antipathy to the negro out- weighed every other consideration." Mr. Cook's portrait gallery of old Chicagoans is so crowded with canvasses that we pass from one to another of them in a state bordering upon bewilderment, so many are the memories evoked and so strong the temptation to linger for a closer inspection. What he says about the redoubtable Wilbur F. Storey is unusually interesting, because he holds a brief for his old- time employer, whom he thinks to have been unjustly maligned in many ways. "There was unquestionably a vein of vindictiveness in Mr. Storey's make-up — as there was in most strong characters in those days — but it was never shown ex- cept against his equals. He was at bottom a just man, far from over-exacting in his demands for service; while every failure had its day in court, and was judged on its merits. He was an incarnation of frankness himself, and demanded this quality in his subordinates. Mr. Storey's faults were largely the defects of his qualities. He was through and through a newspaper man. News for him, however, included the shady side of life; and in exploiting this he gave perhaps too much scope for individual license. I am certain that he never gave an order that a scandal should be salacious or made attractive to the prurient. ... I permit myself to say that for more than a half-score of years most of the local 'copy' passed through my hands . . . and that during all that time not one line of 'imaginary' or 'fake' matter of any sort or description was either published or so much as submitted for publication." Storey's Copperhead proclivities were of course against him, and were probably the underlying cause of the animus that long directed the attack upon his private life and character. The chapter entitled "An Early Sociable" shall provide our last glimpse of Mr. Cook's somewhat haphazard chronicle, and at the same time cast a pleasant light upon the chronicler. One evening, in the summer of 1866, he had just turned in his "copy "—an account of the raiding of a vile resort — and was about to de- part from the office, when the city editor asked him if he could "spare the time to run down to Mayor Rice's house." It seems that the eldest Miss Rice was giving a party, and Storey had made up his mind to take what was then a new departure in Chicago journalism, and exploit social functions in the columns of the " Times." The young reporter was aghast, for such an as- signment was an absolute novelty, and he could hardly take the request seriously. Asking what sort of story was desired, he was told: "Oh, mention the decorations if there are any, de- scribe some of the most picturesque toilettes, but above all get a list of those present." At last convinced that it was not all a joke, the dis- mayed reporter started out, walked to the Rice residence, and rang the bell. Miss Rice herself came to the door, and asked his errand. He timorously expressed a wish to report the party, but the suggestion was received with constern- ation, and the young woman pleaded so elo- quently against this invasion of her privacy that he promptly capitulated, and turned away without any attempt to gather the desired in- formation. The only story he turned in that night was one about a mysterious baritone who chanced to pass the house, singing "Marching Through Georgia," just as the reporter had taken his leave. His fear of the wrath to come was not realized, and he was never made to suf- fer for his lack of " enterprise." But he tells us that a few months later he would not have escaped so easily, for Storey's edict to have "things of that sort written up for all they were worth " had then gone into force, and the other papers were prompt to follow the lead of the "Times." Thus " society reporting " came into existence as a function of journalism in Chicago. William Morton Payne. Briefs on New Books. o™,nta«> Dr- Georg Witkowski's "German literature in the Drama of the Nineteenth Century 19th century. (Holt), as issued in Professor L. E. Homing's translation, no fewer than 532 dramas by 227 dramatists are mentioned, a very large majority of which receive some discussion. Tet the book is neither sketchy nor unbalanced. Written for the ini- tiated layman, and aiming to throw light on the drama of to-day from an historical standpoint, Dr.Witkowski has, with nothing short of brilliancy, characterized the main movements of the three chronological divisions of the century, and analyzed, from the 322 [Mayl, THE DIAL triple standpoint of art, the actor, and the public, the dramas that have given tone to the various epochs. After a brief but convincing resum.6 of the dramatic situation at the close of the eighteenth century, in which he makes some striking assertions as to the influence of Iff land and Kotzebue then and even now, the author passes rapidly over the first section (1800-1830) with the dramatic failures of the romanticists, devoting a well-proportioned num- ber of pages to Kleist (7), Grillparzer (9), Raimund (2), and Grabbe (3). The portrayals of the faithful wife by Kleist: the superiority of Fate, in Grillpar- zer, in that he did not allow it to relieve from moral responsibility; Raimund's genius in pleasing the jolly Viennese, and Grabbe's picturing of battles, receive just emphasis. In the second division (1830- 1885) he sets forth the polished but spiritless drama of Young Germany in its relation to Hugo, Dumas pkre, and Scribe; the idealizing drama of Halm, Gottschall, Geibel, and Jordan; Hebbel, with his cornerstone of modern dramatic art in " Maria Mag- dalena," on whose shoulders Ibsen stands; Ludwig with his excessive reflection and worship of Shake- speare; the deplorable status of the German stage around 1870; the years (1874-1890) of brilliant service to the German theatre rendered by the Meininger company; the unsurpassed and unsur- passable greatness of Wagner, and Wildenbruch with his themes from Prussian history. This forms the best chapter of the book, because it treats of a period old enough to allow the final word as to its worth; and it is this final word that Dr. Witkowski has spoken with constant certainty and unbroken interest in his theme. The third section (1885- 1900) begins with a terse analysis of Naturalism, at the head of which tendency stands Ibsen, "whose influence no one who writes for the stage can escape, let him yield ever so reluctantly." For three years (1889-1891) the "Free Theatre" existed, and widened the scope of the theatre by extending the limits of permissibility. The movement as such died of inanition. Sudermann is treated as a writer of great talents, who often condescends to flatter the likings of the public regardless of the infallible laws of art . Of Hauptmann's twenty plays, Dr. Wit- kowski thinks that scarcely a single one will hold a lasting place on the stage, while all will live as monuments of this confused and uncertain period. The playwrights of the present, Fulda and all the rest, are treated only tentatively, and skeptically at that. The author seems to begrudge them their popularity, taking this latter as an evidence that they are living from dramatic art rather than for it. As to the future, Dr. Witkowski is at once an opti- mist and a pessimist. He sees hope in the fact that Shakespeare, Goethe, Schiller, and Grillparzer are more in demand than ever; he despairs at the low grade of drama now being produced in the great cities, in the highest intellectual centres. The book contains a valuable table showing the number of performances of the most popular dramas from 1899 to 1905, "Tell " leading the list with 412 in 1905. Anyone who has read a thrilling tale only to find in the last sentence that Shaketpearet. J . somebody s pink pills will cure pale people, can realize the feelings of the reviewer who goes through Mr. W. L. Stoddard's " Life of William Shakespeare Expurgated" (W. A. Butterfield) and discovers in the last paragraph that "in the only document identifying William Shakespeare from Stratford with the poet, the name of so illustrious a contemporary [Lord Bacon] should be secretly imbedded." This book, which is a compilation of contemporary evidence relating to Shakespeare, tries to show that when all inferential matter is "expurgated " there is no evidence before his death connecting the actor William Shakespeare of Strat- ford with the dramatist William Shakespeare of London. The connection, so Mr. Stoddard con- tends, was not made till the publication of the First Folio in 1623. Here we have references to the "Sweet Swan of Avon," mention of the Stratford monument, and Shakespeare's name heading the list of the principal actors in the plays. In other words, if it were not for these pieces of information in the First Folio we should not know specifically why the good folk of Stratford permitted a bust of their fellow-townsman to be set up in the church, except that they believed that, in the words beneath the bust, he was a great genius. The First Folio showed wherein his genius lay; and Mr. Stoddard holds that it is the first bit of evidence that has survived to identify the citizen of Stratford with the play- wright. And it is this part of the Folio that con- tains Mr. W. S. Booth's acrostic signature of Francis Bacon! There is, however, a reference which Mr. Stoddard quotes but does not satisfactorily get rid of; it is a short poem by John Davies addressed "To our English Terence, Mr. Will. Shake-speare" (1611 ?). Here Shakespeare is the playwright; but he also "played some kingly parts in sport," and thereby fits in with tradition. Now it is admitted that the Stratford William Shakespeare acted in the dramatist's plays; therefore there either must have been two William Shakespeares acting in plays, or the dramatist and the actor are identical. Must we "expurgate " the conclusion that the two were one? It is interesting to note that in Professor Wallace's article in the March "Harper's " there is contem- porary reference to William Shakespeare of Strat- ford, and to George Wilkins the dramatist, in the Bellott-Mountjoy lawsuit. If what is generally admitted is accepted here — that Shakespeare and Wilkins collaborated in "Pericles " — we have a similar identification; for it is unlikely that Wilkins would be associated so closely with two separate William Shakespeares. Further, as Professor Wal- lace says, if Shakespeare was a " mere pen-name of some one else, it would be difficult to explain how he and Wilkins were both interested in the suit. . . in behalf of young Bellott, and how the same he and Wilkins also wrote two plays together." It seems, therefore, that we may believe that Shakespeare is Shakespeare still. 1910.] 323 THE DIAL. Of all bibliographical data, that relat- hV in8 10 atlaSeS i8 the m08t difficult to obtain. Lowndes dismisses Thomas Jefferys with the statement that he was geographer to the King and published atlases " which now are of little use "; and this is the almost universal atti- tude toward the "out-of-date" atlas. Only very slowly is it coming to be recognized as an indispensa- ble historical source. A word should be said in appreciation of the monumental "List of Geogra- phical Atlases in the Library of Congress," compiled by Mr. P. Lee Phillips, chief of the division of maps and charts. Mr. Phillips gives nearly 3500 titles, with descriptive notes where needed, and lists of the limps relating to America under each impor- tant one. Of early atlases the Library of Congress possesses all but three of the forty editions of Ptolemy listed by Eames, twenty-two of the folio and fifteen of the smaller editions of Ortelius, eleven editions of Mercator's Atlas Major and eight of the Atlas Minor; but the descriptions of these are less important than those of the miscellaneous atlases of more recent date, since they can be obtained else- where. The classification would have been more logical had the general atlases preceded the special ones; parts of atlases would not then have come before the whole, and reproductions before the originals. The order of arrangement is, however, comparatively unimportant, since there is an exhaustive index of over forty thousand references. We think the exact dimensions of volumes should have been given, since the terms "folio," "quarto," and the like, as applied to atlases, are very indefinite. There are necessarily some lacunae. Curiously, the Library of Congress has no copy of the English edition of the "American Gazeteer," although pos- sessing the Italian translation. The supplementary list, in which it is intended to describe current accessions, will in time fill gaps of this sort. Most people may think that this "List" appeals only to special students; but any library can make a small collection of atlases, which will possess a constantly increasing value, by taking pains to acquire old edi- tions which their owners will otherwise relegate first to the attic and eventually to the ash-heap. Mr. Richard Edgcumbe's "Byron: "Ja» The Career of ax American Diplomat.* There has been some discussion as to whether or not our political system really admits of the "diplomatic career," in the meaning given to that term by long practice over the water. In Mr. Foster's record, one may fairly claim that the possibility has been demonstrated, and the great value of diplomacy on that plane, as com- pared with a service which is made the football of domestic politics, has been proved at the same time. This, too, in spite of the fact that he entered the service by the well-worn political route. As Chairman of the Indiana State Re- publican Committee, in 1872, he had led his party to a triumphant success in the October election, which of course had its effect in in- creasing the majority of Grant a month later. Senator Oliver P. Morton, with his usual assur- ance in matters depending on his influence with Grant, told the young Chairman to take the Federal "Blue Book" and pick out whatever office he might want. The Swiss Mission was modestly selected ; but for once Senator Morton had tripped, for Grant had already assured the incumbent of that post of his retention. Instead of the " something just as good," however, Mr. Foster was overwhelmed by the immediate offer of the Mexican Mission. With no foreign lan- guage at his command, and no diplomatic expe- rience, he frankly informed the Senator that he doubted his own ability for such a position, and felt inclined to refuse the offer. Morton was not impressed, however, and persuaded him to accept. With ordinary politicians, that would simply have meant a term of ineffective service, with a return to politics or business when the post was wanted for some other successful cam- paigner. But Mr. Foster had in his makeup a feeling of moral obligation to do his duty, and the deficiencies which he had painfully felt in prospect were rapidly removed. The Mexicans were soon convinced that the new minister was an able, honest, and broad-minded man, from * Diplomatic Memoirs. By John W. Foster, author of "A Century of American Diplomacy," "American Diplo- macy in the Orient," "The Practice of Diplomacy," etc. In two volumes, with illustrations. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co. 354 [May 16, THE DIAL whom they need fear no attempt at the double- dealing by which the profession of diplomacy is so often disgraced; and this conviction was of great value during the period of strained rela- tions caused by the delay of the Administration at Washington in recognizing the validity of the revolution led to success by Porfirio Diaz in 1877. In 1880 Mr. Foster was transferred to St. Petersburg, where he remained less than two years, as he had concluded that family inter- ests demanded his attention. This brief period included the assassination of Alexander the Second, of which an interesting account is given in these memoirs ; also some of the famous state trials of the Nihilists—among others, of Sophie Perofsky, a woman of aristocratic connections and superior education, who had waved the sig- nal for the throwing of the bomb by which the Emperor was slain. It is told of her that she was accustomed to sleep with a hundred pounds of dynamite under her bed, in order to be able to balk the officers of their prey if she and her associates were detected. Sixteen years later, Mr. Foster's services were again employed at St. Petersburg by the McKinley Administration — this time on a special mission in connection with the Fur Seal negotiations. His determination to return to private life, formed in 1881, was reversed two years later at the earnest solicitation of President Arthur, who recognized his special fitness for the Spanish Mission, and for the inauguration of a policy of commercial reciprocity with the Spanish- American countries upon which the President had set his heart. He entered heartily upon the scheme for commercial reciprocity, but was forced to conclude in the end, after added experience under the Harrison and McKinley Administrations, that our system of government furnishes too many disturbing elements to admit of that permanence without which the recip- rocity system can be little else than a source of irritation in our negotiations with foreign countries. By special request of the President, Mr. Foster remained at Madrid for a time, under the Cleveland Administration, and might have remained longer but for his own desire to with- draw and take up once more the practice of law. But his well-known diplomatic abilities were destined to interfere with this plan, as before. A call to the cabinet of President Harrison as Secretary of State, renewed attempts at recip- rocity treaties, the Bering Sea Arbitration, the Alaskan Boundary Settlement, and the Hague Peace Conference, all drew him at dif- ferent times into the service of his country, and in every case to his own credit and to the pub- lic good. Most interesting of all, however, are the pages which tell of the call received by Mr. Foster from the Emperor of China, in the closing days of 1894, to act as adviser to the Chinese commission which had just been appointed to the bitter task of going to Japan to sue for peace. It was a notable opportunity, and nobly used; but space will not admit the details of the story here. We may only state that his thoroughly disinterested service to China, in the hour of her humiliation and peril, was indirectly one of the best services which it was ever his lot to render to his own land. In their important contributions to American history, these volumes are of the highest value. There is not one of the great subjects treated on which new light is not thrown ; and when we get to the position that young men may inten- tionally prepare themselves for diplomatic ser- vice with some chance of being actually called to it because of such preparation, Mr. Foster's volumes will inevitably form an important ele- ment in their reading. If space were available, we would gladly quote some of his estimates of the men with whom his career brought him into contact. These are generally kindly, and never harsh in tone, — though there are times when the lancet goes deep by suggestion, if not by direct thrust. For instance, when the desire of Marcus A. Hanna to enter the Senate made it politically requisite to take John Sherman from that body and thrust him, in his old age and physical weakness, into the new and difficult duties of the office of Secretary of State, we are told that this was " an act from which the kindly nature of President McKinley doubtless shrank, but which he did not feel at liberty to evade." Two points in his theory of diplomatic ethics are worthy of especial attention and emulation. At the outset of his career, in Mexico, Mr. Foster found his diplomatic colleagues, almost without exception, making investments in Mexi- can mines or speculating in mining stocks. For himself, he set the rule at once that as a diplo- matic representative he should have no interests of any kind whatever in the country to which he was accredited, and no personal complications in the claims of any of his fellow countrymen. If all our representatives, especially to the coun- tries of this hemisphere, had been equally con- scientious in observing the demands of personal and national propriety in this matter, our repu- tation would have been spared a good many 1910.] 355 THE DIAL stains which it now has to carry. The other point relates to the attitude of the diplomat to home politics. During his mission to Mexico, Mr. Foster was persuaded by Senator Morton to return temporarily to the United States and take part in the electoral contest of 1876. "I regard that act," he says, "as one of the most serious mistakes of my diplomatic career. A diplomatic officer, more than any other, should be a non-partisan representative." He also re- lates in another chapter an experience of Secre- ary Hay, who was persuaded (if that is the word to use) by President Roosevelt to make a speech in New York City on the eve of the campaign of 1904. He remonstrated with the President, insisting that the Secretary of State should not take part in politics, since it would have a bad influence on the Diplomatic Corps, and injure his influence with the Senate, which must pass on his treaties and policies. To all this, the reply of President Roosevelt was that if Secretary Hay did not make the speech the election might be lost, and he not be Secretary of State the next term. We close with a few lines from Mr. Foster's own closing paragraph: "When, at the close of my mission to Spain, I re- sumed my residence in Washington, 1 was fifty years of age; and from that date forward I did my most laborious and successful work. It seemed as if the earlier portion of my life had been merely a preparation for the labor which was in store for me, and which proved the most useful and important. I have been highly honored by my country with many important public trusts, but I have the consciousness of having earnestly striven to discharge them faithfully." W. H. Johnson. The Genius of the French.* A new book with the title "The French Procession: A Pageant of Great Writers," is cer- tainly promising; dedication and a prefatory letter to Vernon Lee give almost a pledge of that rarest of intellectual treats, a literary causerie; the author's name is a guarantee of good work. We in America have long known Mary F. Rob- inson as a writer whose poetry has a sure though narrow appeal; we know also that as Mrs. James Darmesteter her interpretation of French history has been scholarly and vivid; now, as Madame DuClaux, this Englishwoman with long French affiliations is fully equipped to present what she calls the " literature of a great nation, in its vast succession and continuity, as it passes down the * The French Procession. A Pageant of Great Writ- ers. By Madame Mary DuClaux (A. Mary F. Robinson). New York: Duffield & Co. ages." This literature, she says, " appears as a spectacle, a progress, a pageant, wherein every figure is not only a marvel but the embodiment of a whole invisible plexus of secret influences, ideas, traditions, and revolts.1' Gladly does the reader take a position with the author on her balcony, which she calls "the watch-tower of a tranquil mind," to look on this pageant—"the continuous genius of a people." A glance at the table of contents, which serves as a telescope to sweep the whole proces- sion into our ken, shows the great divisions of the progress —" In the Distance," "The Roman- tics," "The Sons of Science." The first division permits a promiscuous grouping. Here are poet, king, scientist, mystic, rebel, in due range. How shall we come close to the spirit of the French nation, if those we look upon differ so markedly in temperament as Fe'nelon and Voltaire? We listen to the overture to the march in the essay on French Poetry, eager for a clue to the line of thought we are to busy ourselves with as this varied company troops past us. But this over- ture, though strong and fine, is found to have little relation to what follows. In the entire com- pany there are but five poets—Ronsard, Racine, Victor Hugo, Alfred De Musset, and Beaude- laire, — and these are so distantly scattered in the procession as to lack impressiveness. We must be satisfied, then, with this essay as a com- ment on French Poetry; for of these five poets only Racine is closely described. Some may think he is given more than his due; others may feel that Villon is more representative of the early modern French spirit than Ronsard, and that Paul Verlaine is more typical of later French poetry than Beaudelaire. Accepting them, however, as chosen, Madame DuClaux, in interpreting these poets as part of the "continuous genius of the French," shows herself to be more of a biographer than critic. Victor Hugo will not be made clearer to an English reader by the mass of personal detail which in nowise explains his poetry. Alfred De Musset is enmeshed in his amorous intrigues, till the fair soul of the hapless youth seems lost in a maze of gossip. Beaudelaire is not keenly defined as a decadent; and being here in the rank of the poets, he gains no laurels for his beautiful prose. In spite of Madame DuClaux's avowal of allegiance to French poetry, there is reason to doubt its warmth. True, France has no such poets as England; but the French themselves feel no lack in their poetry. From infancy they lisp it in the fables of Fontaine; in early youth they are well grounded in the sen- 356 [May 16, THE DIAL lament of Lamartine and in the wit of Moliere. As for Victor Hugo, he is by acclamation the very " genius " of French poetry. But it is just this subtle genius we do not get from mere bio- graphical data. It is well, after looking at these poets, who are far apart in other ways than in this procession, to read again Madame DuClaux's introductory essay on French Poetry, and thus be assured that her feeling for the subject is sincere and even noble. Not only is the treatment of the poets of the pageant unsatisfactory, that of the great prose writers of France is even more so; for it is through French prose that English readers may best discern the French spirit. Hence one re- sents a broad inclusion of minor influences in French thought, when these might better give way to the originative forces that have given French literature, in so many aspects, an unquestionable superiority. Voltaire, Balzac, Sainte-Beuve, and Anatole France fill large places in French literature; but do they vitally cohere without Rabelais and Montaigne? Here was an excellent opportunity to define the "continuous genius" of the French people — a genius for satire, for urbane discursiveness, for social insight, for subduing the whole realm of thought and (as with Balzac) of passion, to rhythmic order, to stable congruity; above all, a genius for what might be called literary conse- cration. Any of this group is typical of this one phase of French literary biography—none more so than Voltaire; yet Madame DuClaux allows Professor Lanson to say the only vital thing about Voltaire, a man in whom meet so many tendencies of the French mind — keen- ness, criticism, a zeal for human progress even when deriding the steps thereto, a passionate interest in the things of the mind independent of race or religion, a catholic intellectuality. Goldsmith's description of him defending En- glish literature in a hostile company symbolizes Voltaire's attitude toward all literature. His impatience of Congreve, for wishing to be thought an English gentleman rather than a writer of witty comedies, suggests the difference between the literary spirit of France and of England. The French subordinate life to liter- ature; the English use literature for some gain in life. Balzac, whose conquest of literature is Napo- leonic, whose Comedie Humaine expresses in its very title the French genius for social inter- pretation, has made but little impression upon Madame DuClaux. In this, as in so much of her book, she is busied with what is adventitious in a man's life, and not with what is essential in his art. She admits that Balzac created the modern novel, and then denies any meaning in this honor by ranking him with Sir Walter Scott. The man who saw society and saw it whole, who caught the secret of passion as it affects life, and of money as a passion, and of vocational success as it is thwarted by or rises superior to either sex or money, has no affinity with Walter Scott. Fortunately, Madame Du Claux saves herself from total error in her estimate of Balzac by a real appreciation of some of his qualities; but his splendid achieve- ment— so all-inclusive, so integrated, so start- ling in insight, that his name comes to mean life — needs a connotation other than this. So too does Balzac's critic enemy, Sainte-Beuve, who did for French literature what the novelist did for French life — grasped it entire and gave it new meaning, teaching any critic who comes after him that he must know not only literature but history and philosophy in their relation to the individual writer. Madame Du Claux is not a vital literary critic, and there- fore does not do justice to the greatest of critics. She does, however, approach something like real critical acumen in her study of Anatole France, whom she discriminatingly contrasts with Maurice Barres in a few large generaliza- tions which are worth more as criticism than whole pages of intimate gossip. Madame DuClaux's interest in French his- tory is keen; her ability to trace the under- currents, to point out the depths and shallows of its wayward course, is sure. It is only fair to give all possible credit to the part of the pageant in which men of historical significance appear. The placing of Louis Quatorze in relation to the spirit of his time is excellent. Rousseau has perhaps never been so thoroughly presented within the small compass of an essay. One may question the right of LaClos and Liancourt to be in this august assembly; but being here, they are amply accounted for. The interpretation of " The Sons of Science" is also illuminating. Whether they are real scientists like Fontenelle, or those who, like Ernest Renan and Hippolyte Taine, applied a scientific method to the study of religion and literature, their part in the procession is made brilliant and convinc- ing. In fact, there is a tendency throughout these discussions to make philosophy and science, as developed by the French, their real genius; whereas the genius of the French is distinctively literary, and everything else is subordinate to this. And because of this literary power 1910.] 357 THE DIAL they bear away the palm for movements and measures they did not originate. John Locke anticipated Rousseau's educational doctrine, just as Richardson had anticipated much of the sentimentality of "La Nouvelle Heloi'se"; but Rousseau alone possessed the magic of the winged word to blow his truth about the world. He had the power of the angel voice to trumpet his message till it toppled the throne of kings. German theologians pointed out the necessity of Hebrew philology in the history of religion before Ernest Renan. They lacked Renan's sweet reasonableness in proving this; hence Renan is read and the Germans are for- gotten. Even Fenelon's lessons to the Due de Bourgogne are cast in artistic form. French- men, whether scientists, scholars, reformers, or critics, are writers above all else, and form is the priceless wedding-garment which singles them out at the feast of things intellectual. The quality of this form is what we should most wish to see when all these types are massed as a Pageant of Great Writers. But our guide, intellectually alert as she is, forgot this in attending to much which, though creditable to her learning, |is not closely according to her initial programme. No degree of attention to philosophy and sci- ence as an expression of the French spirit can keep one from looking, as this pageant passes, for a persistent element in French history and letters — a line of notable women. By the promise made of a literary review in the preface, Madame de Maintenon has a more legitimate right among the choice and master spirits of her age than Louis XIV. She had a finer influ- ence upon Madame DuClaux's favorite, Racine. Madame de Sevign^ had a quality of the French spirit beautiful to know. By a perverse selec- tion, we have a paper on "Goethe in France," though the very logic of the subject demands that we see how France went well equipped to Goethe when Madame de Stael was gathering ma- terial for her De VAllemagne. The only woman observable from the tower is George Sand, and she is so trivially exhibited that her place might well have been given to Flaubert, who loved to call her master. The enthusiastic Sandist, will resent Madame DuClaux's airing of unpleasant facts which in no way affect the fine imagina- tion of that unique force in literature. There are two essays on George Sand, and scarcely a word about her literary fecundity, her fine idyllic sense, her aptitude for an intellectual comrade- ship so helpful to Balzac in his precarious career, to Sainte-Beuve's simple life of reading and writing, and to Flaubert in his sullen isolation. The varied gifts of George Sand should not be ignored, even by an Englishwoman. Both Elizabeth Barrett and George Eliot were glad to acknowledge their indebtedness to her. Lit- erature itself has been enriched by her love of the picturesque, her large feeling for things human, her ease and grace in writing. She belongs truly to the French genius. And what is this genius? Is it not a match- less sincerity toward art, and toward literature as the greatest art? This sincerity is their inspiration to an almost superhuman industry in acquiring a style adequate to every form of expression. Style — that is the gift of the French. It is not in their literature alone, but in their whole range of life, — in their delicate food, their ornate clothing, their fine speech, their distinguished manners, their superb capi- tal which in itself is a glory of art. Ellen FitzGerald. The Negro Problem Viewed across the Color-line.* The American Race-problem is one which still interests writers and readers, if one may judge from the annual output of books and pamphlets about it. Once in a long while a book is written which is worth reading; many are useless, or worse. Professor Kelly Miller's "Race Adjustment" is well worth reading. The author is a negro, born in North Carolina during the Civil War; it is probable that he was a slave for two years, although " Who's Who in America " does not enlighten us on that point; for the past twenty years he has been a professor in Howard University. He has wit- nessed the trial of various plans for the solution of the race-problem, and has seen most of them fail; he knows much of the conditions of negro life, and is acquainted with the plans and opin- ions of the leaders of the race. His book con- tains nineteen chapters; the most important topics treated are Radicals and Conservatives, The Leopard's Spots, Social Equality, The City Negro, Religion as a Solvent of the Race Prob- lem, Surplus Negro Women, Rise of the Pro- fessional Class, Frederick Douglass, Higher Education of the Negro, Roosevelt and the Negro. The temper of the book will surprise those who once thought that Professor Miller belonged •Rack Adjustment. Essays on the Negro in America. By Kelly Miller. New York: The Neale Publishing Co. 358 [May 16, THE DIAL to the radical wing of the negro progressives. With two exceptions — these being fierce and excusable criticisms of Mr. Thomas Dixon and Mr. John Temple Graves—the papers making up the volume are moderate' in feeling and state- ment; they show evidence of plain common- sense, and there is an absence of that peculiar irritating quality that is usually found in race- problem literature. The style is clear and force- ful, vivid at times; but never is the language violent. The author is fond of comparisons, and makes some effective ones. The following striking sentences are selected as typical: "Verbal vehemence void of practical power to enforce demands is an ineffectual missile to be hurled against the stronghold of prejudice." "All truly useful men must be, in a measure, time- servers; for unless they serve their time they can scarcely serve at all." "Douglass insisted upon rights; Washington insists upon duty." That he possesses a sense of humor, the writer frequently shows; as when, in quoting Freeman's suggestion for a solution of the Celtic and Afri- can race-problems, he remarks: "Let each Irish- man kill a negro, and get hanged for it." The best of the book is the first chapter — an interesting comparision of the policies and the leaders of the negro radicals and conservatives. Booker Washington is classed as a conservative; Professor DuBois, and Trotter, editor of the Boston " Guardian," are leading radicals. The author is conservative, but will not yield unre- served allegiance to Washington. One interested in learning what the negroes think about the negro problem will profit by this discussion of the conflicting policies and the keen analysis of the motives and principles of the rival groups of leaders. Washington, the conservative, who came when others had failed,—"a time-server" in the best sense; supported by white opinion; who talks of duties rather than of rights; con- structive, not critical; quiet and diplomatic, not disputatious; business-like, not heroic, is con- trasted with Trotter, the extreme radical, who would insist on absolute right, yield nothing for expediency's sake, and altogether disregard the opinions of whites. The estimate of Washing- ton and his policies is especially good. "Few men have Bhown such power of development. . . . He avoided controverted issues, and moved, not along the line of least resistance, but of no resistance at all. He founded his creed upon construction rather than upon criticism. He urged his race to do the things possible rather than whine and pine over things pro- hibited." Of the radical chief, he says: "Mr. Trotter is well suited to play the role of a martyr. He delights in a reputation for vicarious heroics. Being possessed of considerable independent means, he willingly makes sacrifices for the cause, and is as uncompromis- ing as William Lloyd Garrison. Mr. Trotter, however, lacks the moral sanity and poise of the great emancipator. With him, agitation is not so much the outgrowth of an intellectual or moral comprehension of right and repre- hension of wrong, as it is a temperamental necessity. Endowed with a narrow, intolerant intensity of spirit, he pursues his ends with a Jesuitical justification of untoward means. Without clear concrete objective, such as the anti-slavery promoters had in view, he strikes wildly at whatever he imagines obscures the rights of the Negro race. He has the traditional irreverence of the reformer, an irreverence which delights to shatter popular idols. President Eliot of Harvard University, Theodore Roosevelt, and Booker T. Washington are shining marks for his blunt and bitter denunciation. He sets himself up as the moral monitor of the Negro race." Professor DuBois, the other radical whose books on negro affairs have attracted wide atten- tion, began, the author says, as a calm scientific investigator, but under the influence of Trotter he became an agitator of the extreme type, one of the leaders of the "Niagara Movement" against color discrimination. It is the author's opinion that Professor DuBois is not suited to the role of agitator. "He is a man of remarkable amplitude and con- trariety of qualities, an exact interrogator, and a lucid expositor of social reality, but withal a dreamer with a fantasy of mind that verges on the fine frenzy. . . . His place is the cloister of the reflective scholar." In the rest of the book there is little that is wholly original; it is chiefly a new treatment of old subjects. The author calls attention to a fact frequently unconsidered — that the rise of "democracy " in the South and the accession of "popular leaders" to power has resulted in greatly increased race friction. But, as he further says, in comparing the opportunities offered to the negro in North and South,— «It must be conceded that the Southern white man frequently displays commendable personal good-will toward individual Negroes who come within the circle of his acquaintance or control. In general, there is the widest margin between his avowed public policy and his personal demeanor. No reputable Southerner is half as bad as Senator Tillman talks" That religion is destined to be one of the strongest forces in the solution of the race troubles, is the belief of the author, who asserts that a basis for cooperation and mutual help- fulness will be found in the fact that nearly all negroes are members of the two great demo- cratic churches, the Baptist and the Methodist, — a fact true also of the Protestant whites. The negro professional and business classes are developing rapidly; a fact of more importance than the criminality of the lowest classes. The statistics quoted seem to show that city life is not good for negro man or woman, and that 1910.] 359 THE DIAL few opportunities are offered in a city. "As one walks along the streets of our great cities and views the massive buildings and sky-seeking structures, he finds no status for the negro above the cellar floor." On the other hand, the negro "by virtue of his geographical dis- tribution holds the key to the agricultural development of the South,"—the concentration of the race in the black belt, the "Land of Gosheu," being as effective now as it was fifty years ago to bar out white competition. So many opinions of Mr. Roosevelt's negro policy have been recorded that it seems proper to allow this one: "He is not permanently wedded to any one question as the dominant note of his career. He suddenly takes up a measure, settles it, and drops it, and goes in quest of issues new. And so in dealing with the negro he has established the principle but has desisted at the point of practical application." Walter L. Fleming. Briefs on New Books. In his latest book, "The Bridling of Zt.^ZT Pegasus" (Macmillan), Mr. Alfred Austin has brought together a series of miscellaneous essays in criticism, — one of them inspired by the recent ter-centenary of Milton's birth, another delivered as a lecture some ten years ago before a Dante Society, still another published in one of the English magazines while Tennyson was yet alive, and most of the rest written appar- ently before the end of Tennyson's century. The first of the essays — there are ten in all, and each of them must make interesting reading for all who find pleasure in the critical essay — is on "The Essentials of Great Literature," and is a plea for a return to first principles in the criticism of poetry. These principles Mr. Austin conceives to be, first of all, melodiousness and lucidity; and after these, the largeness of conception and the power that we asso- ciate with epic and dramatic verse. The dethrone- ment of poetry in popular favor in recent times he attributes largely to the neglect of these essentials in current criticism, though he holds that there have been other contributory influences at work, in "the perpetual reading of novels of every kind," the increase of the feminine or sentimental in literature, and " the febrile quality of contemporary existence." The sentimental note in our literature furnishes the theme of the second essay. The third treats anew the time-worn theme of Milton's likeness and unlike- ness to Dante. The fourth — the most substantial and the most spirited chapter in the book — deals with the relative rank of Byron and Wordsworth, and is an attempt to discredit sundry of Matthew Arnold's dicta in his famous prefatory essay on Wordsworth. Mr. Austin admits the justness of Arnold's assertion that Wordsworth must profit by the "boiling down" process to which Arnold sub- jected him in his volume of selections, but denies that this is true also of Byron; in like manner he argues, with much emphasis — and, it must be admitted, with something of plausibility — that Arnold was wrong in contending that Wordsworth reveals more of life than does Byron, or that he reveals life more powerfully; he also demurs to Arnold's judgment that a poetry of optimism is necessarily a greater poetry than that in which the note of sadness and discontent is struck, although he seems to contradict himself later in his essay on "Poetry and Pessimism." Another stirring essay, "A Vindication of Tennyson," is directed against the poet Swinburne, whom Mr. Austin calls to account for having once charged Tennyson, strangely enough, with " inaptitude for musical verse." The remaining essays are concerned with "Dante's Realistic Treatment of the Ideal," " Dante's Poetic Conception of Woman," "The Relation of Litera- ture and Politics," and "A Conversation with Shakespeare in the Elysian Fields." The volume adds little or nothing to our stock of critical theory, is in no sense constructive, but in its insistence on faith in first principles and on loyalty to the masters it is bound to have a wholesome influence. _ . , The almost simultaneous publication Two oookm on ... ... the problem of of two exhaustive investigations into woman't work. the industrial status of working wom- en testifies to the increasing and serious interest in the subject. Miss Elizabeth B. Butler's "Women and the Trades," published under the Russell Sage Foundation by the Charities Publication Committee, is based on a close study of four hundred establish- ments in the "millionaire city" of Pittsburgh in which the labor of women and girls was utilized, and includes a survey of the employment of 22,185 of those women and girls at twenty-seven trades. Miss Butler's book is not a mere statistical statement of numbers, hours, wages,—these things have been accurately ascertained and stated, — but a sympathe- tic discussion of all the factors, social as well as economic, in the problem of women's employment in Pittsburgh. It appears that less than one per cent of the workers are skilled, while less than two per cent deserve the name of craftswomen; twenty- three per cent do work that requires only dexterity, and of sixteen per cent not even dexterity is de- manded. This means that by far the great majority of the women studied are industrially helpless,—that is, doing work which makes no demand on their intelligence and affords little opportunity for ad- vancement. Miss Butler points out the serious con- sequences of this condition to the community. She shows that few (less than two per cent) get elsewhere — in clubs, social and educational, or in other social organizations—the training that is lacking in their work. One cannot begin to indicate the important facts here brought out, or the ways in which the Pittsburgh community, and many others of which it 360 [May 16, THE DIAL is a type, must begin the task of protecting women wage-earners. In the United States as a whole, women are engaged in 295 of the 303 occupations specified in the Twelfth Census; and it is an inter- esting problem to trace out the beginnings of their careers as wage-earners, to see how recent a condition is their wide distribution in gainful occupations, what the conditions of their early industrial employment were, what wages they received, what were their hours of work and their surroundings. These things Miss Edith Abbott's " Women in Industry" (Apple- ton) tells us. It is the most comprehensive and care- ful study, historical and statistical, that has been made of the employment of women. In it their industrial life is traced from colonial times through the period of transition from house industries to the present factory system with its minute division of labor. A general survey of the fields of industry in which women were earliest employed, with many quaint and amusing quotations from old note-books, records, and periodicals, is followed by histories of special industries, chosen because of their impor- tance, now or earlier, in the employment of women workers. An interesting conclusion from the gen- eral survey is that, contrary to popular belief, '' the increase in the number of women employed in fac- tories has not meant the 'driving out' of men," the proportion of women in the New England mills having steadily declined since 1827, when they were nine-tenths of all the operatives, to 1900, when they were less than half. The data which Miss Abbott has collected disprove also another frequent asser- tion regarding women—that they have only recently become self-supporting; the early records show that women supported themselves before the era of the factory. The discussion of the problem of women's wages confirms, in connection with the broad field of women's employment, what Miss Butler's study revealed as true for them in Pittsburgh: that for the most part "women not only do the low-paid but the unskilled work." This volume is in one respect unlike Miss Butler's: one seems to detect in it a hidden brief for the "cause of women "; while the other work, though sympathetic, is nevertheless impartial in its attitude. Together they are distinc- tive and important contributions to the problem of woman's work. A Ruttian Captain Vladimir Semenoff, of the Admiral Russian navy, in a book called "The Mead & Co.), Dr. William Hanna Thomson has re- printed a series of essays which originally appeared in "Everybody's Magazine." Their aim is the popular presentation of certain medical topics not generally understood by the layman. In fact, if "medicine" had been substituted for "biology" in the title, a more just relationship between the cover of the book and its contents would have been effected. For while the science of medicine is certainly applied biology, the relationship between the applied and pure science here is not so close in current thought or usage as quite to justify labelling as "biology" a book dealing with such topics as abnormalities of the mind, infection, and the like. Dr. Thomson is a fluent and entertaining writer. Four of the seven essays which make up the volume deal primarily with medical aspects of psychology. Here the author is at his best, — though the traditional granum talis will not come amiss even here. The last two essays are concerned with very broad and fundamental problems of philosophical biology. Their titles are respectively "Is this Earth the Only Abode of Phy- sical Life?" and "The Nature of Physical Life." On the whole it is fair to say that these two essays 1910.] 361 THE DIAL do not satisfactorily solve the questions they raise, although there is not to be found even a perfunctory expression of modest doubt on the author's part as to whether there may not still be left something worth discussing in regard to these great problems after this book is finished. Indeed, Dr. Thomson's manner of dealing with the intellectual difficulties implied in the chapter-headings quoted, in its mingling of genial but at the same time absolute certainty, and the smallest but none the less distinct bit of a patronizing tone, is much like that adopted by the old-school country " doctor" in his amelioration of visceral ills. The conclusion reached is that the earth is the only abode of life, chiefly because "Man himself is alto- gether exceptional. . . . He is simply supernatural, and above all biology." Just what this really has to do with the questions under discussion, does not appear. But since the chief purpose of these last two essays is plainly to inculcate the highest moral principles, the logical non sequitur may perhaps be overlooked. The Quaker at a citizen. Mrs. Francis B. Gummere (Amelia Mott Gummere), in a volume entitled "The Quaker in the Forum" (John C. Winston Co.), considers " an aspect of Quakerism which," she says, with some excess of emphasis on the peculiar nature of her researches, "has hitherto received no attention." The writing of the book was suggested, she tells us, by the question of a professor of history in a New England college, who asked when the Quakers obtained the franchise in America. In seven somewhat rambling and pleasantly anecdotal chapters, the civil status of the follower of George Fox is discussed, with abundant references to author- itative sources of information. First the Quaker attitude toward the oath—hardly a topic that "has hitherto received no attention" — is considered at some length, with illustrative instances; and then come chapters on the Quaker as a "Wanton Gos- peller," "The Quaker Franchise," "The Quaker Citizen and the Law," "The Quaker in Interna- tional Politics," "The Quakers and Mirabeau," and "Quaker Loyalty." The fifth of these essays seems to owe its being chiefly to the fact that the writer has in her possession a silver cream-jug presented by Dr. John Fothergill, a Quaker physician in London, to Benjamin Franklin, upon the latter's departure for America in 1775; this chapter is less compre- hensive and general in its nature than its title might lead one to expect. The book is appropriately illus- trated, chiefly with portraits. Romantic career 0ne of most interesting and o/ a Frenchman unique of careers among Americans in the Civil War. is that of General Regis deTrobriand; and this career is commemorated in a worthy biog- raphy by his daughter Mrs. Marie Caroline Post . One could hardly ask for more in a novel of adven- ture than is to be found in this book. General de Trobriand came of a line of soldiers reaching back to William the Conqueror. He was the first in these hundreds of years to enter a different career, and this because under the House of Orleans the army was closed to him as a loyal upholder of the Bourbon line. Chance brought him to the New World in 1841; he married a New York heiress and remained a loyal American, though by birth he belonged to the high nobility and could claim the "sixteen quarterings" that gave him position among the proudest, and in his boyhood had made him a page to the Bourbon heir to the throne. Regis de Trobriand excelled in many things. He could swim seven miles, and then row his defeated contest- ants back to the starting-point; he was a writer of skill and superior style in both French and English; a musical and dramatic critic, an excellent musician, a painter of reputation, a friend and companion of noted men and women on both sides of the Atlantic. When the Civil War broke out, although he was in middle life, he offered himself to the Government, and served with distinction throughout the war, rising to the rank of Major General. A volume of his reminiscences, "Quatre ans de Campagnes a PArmee du Potomac," is a fine story of the cam- paigns of that army, and did much to shape French opinion on American matters. At the close of the war he was made a colonel in the regular army, and served on the frontier until he was retired for age. The story of this interesting life is well told; an obstacle to the enjoyment of it will be found by some in their inability to read and appreciate the best por- tions— letters, diaries, and the like—which are in French and untranslated. (E. P. Dutton & Co.) corropondence "The Correspondence of Priscilla, of a counter in Countess of Westmoreland," edited diplomatic u/e. by her daughter, Lady Rose Weigall, and published by the Messrs. Dutton, constitutes a sufficiently bulky sequel to the "Letters of Lady Burghersh during the Campaign of 1813-14," which appeared in 1893. The writer of both series of letters was, by birth, a Pole ( Priscilla Ann Wellesley Pole) and a niece of the great Duke of Wellington; while her marriage to Lord Burghersh, afterward eleventh Earl of Westmoreland, a soldier and a diplomat, connected her with another family of distinction. Her familiar correspondence, thought by her daughter to throw "a new and true light on much that has been misconceived, especially in re- gard to the formation of the German Empire," has the naturalness and varied interest that an intelli- gent and observing woman, residing successively at various European capitals and mingling with court society, might be expected to impart to her informal descriptions of her surroundings. As to the new light thrown on the formation of the German Em- pire, since her latest published letter is dated 1865, and her earlier references to the hopes and plans of German unity are neither very numerous nor very startling in their revelations, the illumination can hardly be considered dazzling. But those interested in European history of the last century, especially 362 [May 16, THE DIAL those old enough to remember much of its making, will find entertainment in the book, which is, more- over, appropriately though sparingly illustrated and carefully indexed. Two year. "The Diarv of a Daly D<5butante" behind the (Duffield ) is made up of "passages footlighix. from the journal of a member of Augustin Daly's famous company of players," if the title-page is to be credited; and a "publishers' note" informs the reader that the Diary, written in 1879-81, has quite by chance become available for publication thirty years later. "It is printed ver- batim," we are to believe, "with only such omis- sions as have seemed expedient for personal reasons, the writer having since become well known in another walk of life." Who the writer is, may furnish food for conjecture to the veteran theatre- goer; but as the parts assigned to her by Mr. Daly were always inconspicuous, and sometimes mute, there is small danger that her veil of anonymity will be rudely torn aside. Her first impressions of her fellow-players — some of them, like Mr. John Drew and Miss Ada Rehan, subsequently famous — are of special interest. The tone of the Diary is good- natured throughout; in fact, the daily entries are just such as a well-bred and wide-awake young lady might be expected to write under the given condi- tions. Play-going readers, especially if old enough to have witnessed the performances of the Daly company from the beginning, will find innocent amusement in this "Diary of a Daly Debutante." A book of English origin is intro- on ai/ron'omt*. duced to American readers, with the title " Chats about Astronomy " (Lip- pincott). The title is an accurate description of the contents. Mr. H. P. Hollis, the learned President of the British Astronomical Association, may be pre- sumed to have knocked the ashes out of his pipe (if he smokes), and to have summoned his stenographer that he might chat to him in more or less desultory fashion on a dozen loosely connected topics of astro- nomical import. Four of the chapters are about the earth; the longest of the other eight attempts to give the reader an introduction to the constellations. Notwithstanding the chatty nature of these talks, the author has been careful about his facts — an exception being the story on page 41 about what Halley said concerning the return of his comet. There are evidences of careless proof-reading: on page 41 some Greek words have their accents and breathings in sad disarray ; such slips as " Astrope," "chartering stars," "Enke," "Aquita," "Delphi- nas," "Aldeharan," and " Crommelia," are not very creditable. But aside from these minor defects, the book may be recommended to anyone who does not care for a systematic and orderly treatment of the subject, and will not miss the beautiful illustrations with which popular books on astronomy are usually adorned. BRIEFER MENTION. Messrs. £. F. Dntton & Co. publish a new edition of "The Works of Sir John Suckling in Prose and Verse," edited by Mr. A. Hamilton Thompson. The plays and the letters, when added to the more familiar lyrics, make up a stouter volume than one would expect. The original title-pages of the several publications are reproduced in facsimile, and there is a considerable body of notes. "The aim of this volume is, among other things, to give a concrete discussion of ambiguity, to simplify the study of causal connections, and to treat with greater detail than is usually done the type of inference called circumstan- tial evidence, the nature of proof, and the postulates of reasoning." This is the programme of "An Outline of Logic," by Professor Boyd Henry Bode, published by Messrs. Henry Holt & Co. It is an excellent treatise upon a too-neglected subject, and one of its most useful features is found in the extensive set of appended exercises. One of the best series of supplementary reading- books that have ever been planned is that published by Messrs. Harper & Brothers under the editorship of Mr. Percival Chubb. The readings are to be from the most typically American of American writers, and a volume made up from the juvenile books of Mr. Howells opened the series not long ago. It is now followed by "Travels at Home by Mark Twain," a volume of passages taken from the author's accounts of life on the Mississippi and in the Nevada of "Roughing It." Two further volumes from Mark Twain are soon to be added to the series. We bespeak a hearty welcome from school people for these books. To the series of "Original Narratives of Early American History" (Scribner) the editor, Professor J. Franklin Jameson, has contributed a reprint, with exten- sive annotations, of Captain Edward Johnson's famous "History of New England," better known as "The Wonder-Working Providence of Sion's Saviour in New England "— for that is the title supplied by the running headlines of the original edition. It is now forty-three years since the last previous appearance of this work, as it was given to the public with a learned introductory essay by William Frederick Poole. Professor Jameson has availed himself of Poole's scholarship, and has con- tributed much of his own besides. He is himself a descendant of the author, which has lent a special interest to the task of presenting the work to a new generation of readers. A new edition of the writings of Friedrich Nietzsche, in English translation, is being published by the Mac- millan Co. It is under the supervising care of Dr. Oscar Levy, and will comprise eighteen volumes in all. The following works are now at hand: "Thoughts out of Season," in two volumes, respectively translated by Mr. Anthony M. Ludovici and Mr. Adrian Collins; "The Birth of Tragedy," translated by Dr. William A. Hauss- mann; the first part of " Human all-too-Human," trans- lated by Miss Helen Zimmern; the first part of "The Will to Power," translated by Mr. Ludovici; and "On the Future of our Educational Institutions" with "Homer and Classical Philology," translated by Mr. J. M. Kennedy. For readers who prefer their Nietzsche homoeopathic-epigrammatic doses, we recommend the in little book edited by Mr. A. R. Orage, and entitled "Nietzsche in Outline and Aphorism." This volume is published by Messrs. A. C. McClurg & Co. 1910.] 363 THE DIAL Notes. Mr. Joseph B. Gilder, late editor of "Putnam's Magazine" and long associated with his sister Miss Jeannette L. Gilder in the management of "The Critic," has undertaken the editorship of "The New York Times Saturday Review." The interesting announcement is made of a life of Bret Harte for the "American Men of Letters " series. It is the work of Mr. Henry C. Merwin of Boston, who has been engaged upon it for several years, and has had access to unpublished manuscripts and other authorita- tive sources. Messrs. Ginn & Co. publish a revised edition of that sterling text, "The Leading Facts of American His- tory," by Mr. IX H. Montgomery. This book is par- ticularly well supplied with apparatus for the aid of both student and teacher, and has in a marked degree the merits of conciseness and accuracy. A lawyer's brief for the existence of God and a belief in immortality is embodied in Judge Lysander Hill's "The Two Great Questions " (Chicago: Regan Printing House). The argument is based on a vast array of evidence offered by the processes of nature, and on the difficulty of explaining all the facts of existence by merely natural law. Descendants of the Scotch Irish, and genealogists of whatever ancestry, will be interested in "Scotch Irish Pioneers in Ulster and America," by Mr. Charles K. Bolton, Librarian of the Boston Athenseum, a book which Messrs. Bacon & Brown of Boston announce as nearly ready. The work has been in preparation for several years, and will form an important contribution to the history of American colonization. Among the interesting books to appear in June is a new novel by Sienkiewicz, dealing with the problems of modern life. It is translated from the Polish by Mr. Max A. Dresmal, and is to be published by Messrs. Little, Brown, & Co. The same firm announces a new book by Selma Lagerlof, the famous Swedish author to whom was recently awarded the Nobel Literary Prize of $40,000. The novel is entitled "The Girl from Marsh Croft," and is translated by Miss Yelma Swanston Howard. Professor Willis L. Moore, Chief of the United States Weather Bureau, has written a text-book of " Descriptive Meteorology," which is now published by the Messrs. Appleton. It is an exhaustive work, abundantly illus- trated with charts and diagrams, and is designed for the needs of men in training for the work of forecasting. It may also serve well as a manual for advanced college students. We note with interest that the author is not to be numbered among the deserters from the Laplacian hypothesis concerning the origin of the Solar System. The most complete history ever prepared of an early American magazine is about to be published by the Boston Athenaeum. It comprises the weekly records of a club of brilliant young men of New England who edited " The Monthly Anthology and Boston Review" just a century ago. The book, which will be hand- somely illustrated, will contain an introduction by Mr. M. A. DeWolfe Howe, a complete collation by Mr. Albert Matthews, as well as extensive bibliographical notes of early books reviewed, and a complete list of authors of contributions to the ten volumes of the magazine. THE DIAL'S THIRTIETH ANNIVERSARY. ADDITIONAL TRIBUTES. The Dial continues to receive congratulations and tributes, from individuals and the press, on its Thirtieth Anniversary, just past. If any excuse were needed for adding to the full measure of appreciations printed in the preceding issue, it might be found in the fact that these also belong to the collection, as well as in their interest and the rarity of the occasion which called them forth. While others offer flasks of praise I bring my humble vial I Live long t Live long and useful days! May Fortune's sun pour golden rays Upon the faithful Dial! Many congratulations on the auspicious event. The anniversary marks an era of fair and candid criticism, of honest and sincere appreciations. Nathan Haskell Dole. Boston, May 1. I congratulate you on the Thirtieth Anniversary of The Dial. I remember the Dial of the Transcenden- talists, to which an aunt of mine was a subscriber, and always thought of it when I read your Dial, which I did for many years, and which I think has justified the words of the prospectus of the Dial of seventy years ago. Melville W. Fuller. Supreme Court. WatMngton, D. ft, May S. I appreciate very much what The Dial has done for us and for many causes in which I am interested. The maintenance of such a journal represents a high form of public service, and I am not sure that it does not represent the highest form of public service now open to men. Benjamin I. Wheeler. University of California, April W. This note from a constant reader of The Dial dur- ing the thirty years of success you and your associates and friends are so happily celebrating has been delayed only to give you time to digest all the more important things coming to you. Yet constant readers are not without value, I take it, and their very existence is evidence of their appreciation, not loud but deep. The Dial, especially to one trained in judicial methods, is a balm as well as an education and inspiration, and my gratitude for the privilege of its comfort and instruc- tion during these many years would be hard to plumb. May at least another thirty be its and yours to bless with beauty and worth all the friends among whom I hope always to be. Eugene E. Pbussino. Chicago, May 6. I wish to congratulate The Dial on its Thirtieth Anniversary. The Dial is one of the very few literary periodicals that I find worth reading at all. So from my point of view you have been greatly successful. You should take the foremost place among our periodicals devoted largely to literature. Wilbub L. Cross. Yale University, May k. I always enjoy reading The Dial. I like its com- mon sense, its good judgment, its conscientious fairness, its thorough scholarship. I will not call its deliverances oracles, but they give me a somewhat similar feeling at once of confidence and of finality. The Dial does tell 364 [May 16, THE DIAL, to all who are interested in culture and literature the state of life and growth that is now arrived and arriving. I join the generation it has helped and guided for thirty years in wishing it hearty Godspeed. Jacob Gould Schurman. Cornell Univertity, N. Y., May S. That The Dial should be alive to celebrate the Thirtieth Anniversary of its birth should not be a source of wonder, but when one looks at the cheaper magazines and most of the higher priced ones, all of them grovel- ling before the raw intelligence of the masses, it is a wonderful achievement to make a success of such a publication as The Dial, and the credit should be in accordance with the achievement. Isaac R. Pennypackbb. Saranae Lake. N. Y., April 19. I send my congratulations on the Thirtieth Anniver- sary of The Dial. I wish to add my testimony to the abundance which you have received. It is now a good many years since I began reading The Dial, and no more welcome visitor comes to me. I appreciate espe- cially the generosity of its criticisms: those who are admitted into its precincts receive the best of greetings. May you long live and prosper. Louis J. Block. Chicago, May S. My very cordial congratulations to The Dial on the achievement of so long a period of consistent service to literature, and the hope that successors in my office may have the privilege of a similar congratulation upon the prolongation of this period to a full centennial. Herbert Putnam. Library of Congrett, Wathington, £>._ C. April tS. My heartiest congratulations on your Thirtieth Anni- versary. The fine thing about The Dial is that it does not depend on another light, but adds to the literary world a lustre of its own, while marking the progress of that world. And this may you continue doing for another generation. David T. Thomas. Univertity of Arkansas, May 9. May I congratulate you upon your admirable Thirtieth Anniversary number. I spent most of last evening reading it. Certainly we have nothing else on the same high literary plane as The Dial. Hearty congratu- lations. W. W. Ellsworth (The Century Co.) New York, May 6. Please accept our congratulations upon your Thirtieth Anniversary. May the next thirty years be as fruitful in good deeds and good works as the past thirty, and may all those who have had a part in this development during the past thirty years live to take an active part in the development within the next thirty years. George W. Jacobs & Co. Philadelphia, April 30. I feel that The Dial is one of the few journals in the country true to the best ideals of literature, and a valu- able paper to the critical reader, the publisher, and the general public. John Macrae (E. P. Dittton & Co.) New York, April tS. We hasten to offer our congratulations upon your Thirtieth Anniversary. A periodical that can keep its high standard for thirty years, as yours has done, deserves success. Dcffield & Company. New York. April t9. The Dial, which celebrates its thirtieth anniversary this week, is a literary journal of remarkable enterprise and independence, and Sir Walter Besant once declared it to be unsurpassed by any other literary journal in America or England. It was founded in 1880 by Mr. Francis F. Browne, who named his venture after the famous " Dial " which Margaret Fuller conducted, and to which Emerson, Thoreau, and many of the other New England transcendentalists, contributed. Margaret Fuller's journal ceased after sixteen quarterly numbers; but its namesake has had a longer, if not quite such a brilliant, career. Mr. Browne is justly proud of the fact that he has directed its policy for so long a period, and that, though published in a city often described as the most unliterary in the United States, it is read all over the Republic, and includes among its contributors many of the most distinguished men of letters in Amerioa. London Nation. Chicago has amused itself, and others, by announcing itself from time to time as " the literary centre " of the nation. This is an indefinite phrase, and the boast is as meaningless as it is harmless. The city has a few authors, a few publishers, and many readers of books. But in one respect it is unique. It has the only purely literary jourual of the first rank in America. May 1 The Dial celebrates its thirtieth anniversary. Begun as a monthly, it was changed to a fortnightly publica- tion eighteen years ago, and it is still under the control of its first editor, who has been associated with literary effort in Chicago for nearly half a century. It has stood for the highest ideals in art and politics, although touch- ing upon the latter only incidentally, and it has undoubt- edly exercised upon its readers a powerful influence towards better things. It has earned the praise of great authorities on both sides of the Atlantic for its unbiased judgments and its fearless independence, and its refusal to compromise with unhealthy and sensational tenden- cies in literature has won general admiration. Chicago Tribune. With the first week of May comes the issue of The Dial commemorating the close of its thirtieth year. During that long interval, a generation of human life, its founder, Mr. Francis F. Browne, has been continu- ously its editor, an achievement in personality and literary journalism that is almost without exception. For thirty years The Dial has come regularly out of Chicago, recording and commenting upon the passing and the permanent in literature with a just and author- itative voice. During most of that time, and at the present moment, The Dial stauds alone as the only American newspaper whose sole object is the chronicling and criticism of literary achievement. May it continue in length of years and in wisdom. Boston Transcript. That admirable literary journal, The Dial, of Chi- cago, has just rounded three decades of continuous publication under the same editorial auspices. . . . Mr. Francis F. Browne has been editor of The Dial since its first number appeared in May, 1880. For twelve years he issued the periodical as a monthly, but for the past eighteen years it has been a fortnightly. The Dial has never missed an issue, and its stability of manage- ment is almost unique in American journalism. Its editor has made us all his debtors many times. His has been a quiet but effective influence in the nation's liter- ary development, which we hope may be continued far into the future. American Review of Reviews. 1910.] 365 THE DIAL, To have brought a literary journal safely through thirty years of life in Chicago, in a country not famous for enthusiasm over affairs of culture, is an admirable achievement. It is a tribute in part to editorial devo- tion, but more particularly to the probity which has dis- tinguished The Dial. Concessions have been made neither to the general preference for sensational litera- ture nor to advertisers' desire for indulgence. This rare standard has never been deserted, and the success of The Dial is good testimony that there are publishers and public who appreciate disinterested criticism. That such success may continue and greatly increase must be the wish of all Mr. Browne's contemporaries. And Chicago especially must desire that this anniversary be the portal to even wider and stronger influence. Chicago Evening Post. The Dial is to be congratulated upon its thirtieth anniversary ; but those who have a full appreciation of its high aims, a realizing sense of how firmly it has abided by the faith for sound literature, and how well it has performed its work in its chosen field, will hold with us that thirty years is but a milestone in a career which is destined to continue with honor for many years to come. New York Times Saturday Review. To The Dial, that admirable fortnightly review of our- rent literature and vehicle of sound criticism, our hearty congratulations on the occasion of its thirtieth anniver- sary. Our personal congratulations, too, to its founder and helmsman, who has kept it steady on its consistent course by the polestar of duty to the best interests of literature in the main phases or relations of the term — the author's, the reader's, the publisher's. . . . By austere adherence to its high standards, by develop- ment on its original right lines, and avoidance of the commercial temptations that beset a journal with an ideal, The Dial stands to-day on an eminence of success and international recognition that vindicates the judgment of its founder and his faith in the Emersonian marim of hitching one's wagon to a star. Milwaukee Sentinel. During the whole three decades of its existence this unique and estimable literary fortnightly has been edited by its founder, Mr. Francis F. Browne, whose strong personality and high critical standards have somehow achieved the apparently impossible feat of maintaining in Chicago the one purely literary period- ical in the country. Mr. Browne's success, like that of Theodore Thomas with his orchestra, was due to no concession to popular lack of taste, but to a sort of stern enthusiasm for the best. Mr. Browne and Chicago are alike to be congratulated on The Dial's anniversary. Chicago Record-Herald. On May 1 The Dial celebrates its thirtieth anniver- sary. It is pleasant to reflect that such a paper, printed in the West and devoted to the interests of letters, has had a life so long and a career so honorable and useful. The Dial is one of the very few periodicals in the United States which has steadily stood for high aims and ideals, and in a consistent and dignified and fair-minded fashion kept its readers in touch with our literary production. There is special reason for congratulation that such a publication has been developed in the Middle West; but locality aside, the country at large should rejoice that The Dial exists, and bids fair to become a centenarian. It is one of Chicago's most distinctive and creditable institutions. The Bellman (Minneapolis). The Dial of Chicago is thirty years old this spring. It is a high-class periodical, and it is no slight accomplish- ment to bring a literary periodical in America safely through so long a life. We wish it well, and hope it will live many times as long, with no loss of the cultivation and independence which have marked its history for three decades. Collier's Weekly. The Dial deserves and will receive the hearty con- gratulations of the best men and women, widely scat- tered in space and in station. It has been true to the vision which called it into being. It has been an im- partial and sagacious interpreter of current literature. Unity (Chicago). Every lover of scholarly criticism, of unbiassed opinion, of pure English, and of a sane viewpoint, will rejoice that The Dial has achieved its splendid record and maintained its high literary standard. The Graphic (Los Angeles, Cal.) The Dial celebrates this month the Thirtieth Anni- versary of its appearance among the literary journals of this country, or, perhaps truer still, of the world, since its praise is in every centre of literary culture abroad as well as at home. An unusual circumstance of its history is that during all this time its policy has been directed by the same editor, whose rare gifts have been unre- servedly dedicated to the work of bringing The Dial to a place of preeminence among journals of its class. His reward is the praise of the discerning. . . . While The Dial remains faithful to its present ideals and to its own splendid history, always will there be assurance of a criticism which unites sympathy and insight with the highest integrity. Northwestern Christian Advocate. List of New Books. [The following list, containing 140 titles, includes books received by The Dial since its last issue.] BIOGRAPHY AND REMINISCENCES. Memories of Sixty Tears at Eton, Cambridge, and Else- where. By Oscar Browning, M. A. Illustrated in photo- gravure, etc., large 8vo, 364 pages. John Lane Co. $5. net. Robert Dodsley: Poet, Publisher, and Playwright. By Ralph Straus. Illustrated in photogravure, etc., large 8vo, 407 pages. John Lane Co. $6.50 net. The Life of Mary Lyon. By Beth Bradford Gilchrist. Illus- trated in photogravure, etc., Bvo. 462 pages. Houghton Mifflin Co. $1.50 net. Ruskin and hie Circle. By Ada Earland. Illustrated in photo- gravure, etc.. 8vo, 340 pages. O. P. Putnam's Sons. $1.75 net. Marlon Harland's Autobiography: The Story of a Long Life. 8vo. 498 pages. Harper & Brothers. $2. net. An Old-Pashloned Senator: Orville H. Piatt of Connecticut. By Louis A. Collidge. Illustrated in photogravure, etc., large 8vo, 655 pages. G. P. Putnam's Sons. $3. net. Famous Blue-Stockings. By Ethel Bolt Wheeler. With portraits, large 8vo, 351 pages. John Lane Co. $4. net. HISTORY. The History of the Confederate War, Its Causes and Con- duct: A Narrative and Critical History. By George Cary Eggleston. In 2 volumes, large 8vo. Sturgis & Walton Co. $4. net. A History of Perugia. By William Heywood; edited by B. Langton Douglas. Illustrated, large8vo. 411 pages. "His- toric States of Italy." Q. P. Putnam's Sons. $3.50 net. The Ohio Country, between the years 1783 and 1816. By Charles Elihu Slocum, Ph.D. Large 8vo, 321 pages. G. P. Putnam's Sons. $2. net. Early Rhode Island: A Social History of the People. By William B. Weeden, A.M. Illustrated, 12mo, 880 pages. "Grafton Historical Series." Grafton Press. $2.60 net. 366 [May 16, THE DIAL Colonial Mobile: An Historical Study. By Peter J. Hamil- ton. Revised and enlarged edition; illustrated, large 8vo, 594 pages. Houghton Mifflin Co.. $3.50 net. The Story of Padua. By Cesare Foligno. Illustrated in photogravure, etc., 12mo, 320 pages. "Mediaeval Towns Series." E. P. Dutton & Co. $1.75 net. South Amerioan Fights and Fighters, and Other Tales of Adventure. By Cyrus Townsend Brady. Illustrated, 8vo, 842 pages. "American Fights and Fighters Series." Donbleday, Page & Co. 81.50. British Interests and Activities In Texas, 1838-1846. By Ephraim Douglass Adams, Ph.D. 12mo, 266 pages. Balti- more: John Hopkins Press. $1.50. GENERAL LITERATURE. Leading American Novelists. By John Erskine, Ph.D. With portraits, 8vo, 378 pages. Henry Holt & Co. $1,75 net. An Approach to Walt Whitman. By Carleton Noyes. With frontispiece in photogravure, 12mo, 231 pages. Houghton Mifflin Co. $1.25 net. Essays on the Spot. By Charles D. Stewart. 12mo, 292 pages. Houghton Mifflin Co. $1.25 net. Rest and Unrest. By Edward Thomas. 16mo, 190 pages. E. P. Dutton & Co. $1. net. The Confessions of a Barbarian. By George Sylvester Viereck. 12mo, 207 pages. Moffat. Yard & Co. $1.25 net. The New Baedeker: Casual Notes of an Irresponsible Travel- ler. By Harry Thurston Peck. Illustrated, 12mo. 352 pages. Dodd, Mead & Co. $1.50 net. The Literature of the Victorian Era. By Hugh Walker 8vo. 1067 pages. G. P. Putnam's Sons. The Lost Art of Conversation: Selected Essays. Edited, with introduction, by Horatio S. Krans. Illustrated, 12mo, 366 pages. Sturgis & Walton Co. $1.50 net. The Excursions of a Book-Lover: Papers on Literary Themes. By Frederic Rowland Marvin. 8vo, 331 pages. Sherman, French & Co. $1.50 net. The Dawn of the World: Myths and Wierd Tales Told by the Mewan Indians of California. Edited by C. Hart Merriam. Illustrated in color, etc., large 8vo, 273 pages. Arthur H. Clark Co. $3.50 net. The Two Knights of the Swan: Lohengrin and Helyas. By Robert J affray. Illustrated, 8vo, 123 pages. G. P. Putnam's Sons. $1.25 net. A Collection of Eastern Stories and Legends, for Narration or Later Reading in Schools. By Marie L. Shedlock; with foreword by T. W. Rhys Davids. With frontispiece, 12mo, 141 pages. E. P. Dutton & Co. 50 cts. net. NEW EDITIONS OF STANDARD LITERATURE. The Complete Works of Friedrloh Nietzsche. Edited by Oscar Levy. New volumes: Thoughts out of Season, trans- lated by Adrian Collins; The Birth of Tragedy, translated by Wm. A. Haussmann; The Will to Power, translated by Anthony M. Ludovici; Human All-Too-Human, translated by Helen Zimmern; On the Future of our Educational Institutions, translated by J. M. Kennedy. Each 12mo. Macmillan Co. The Works of George Meredith. Memorial Edition. New volumes: Sandra Bellonl; Rhoda Fleming; Evan Harring- ton. Each illustrated in photogravure, etc., 8vo. Charles Scribner's Sons. (Sold only in sets by subscription.) The Works of Christopher Marlowe. Edited by C. F. Tucker Brooke. New edition; 12mo. 664 pages. Oxford University Press. $1.75 net. Causeries dn Lundi. By C. A. Sainte-Beuve: translated, with Introduction and notes, by E. J. Trechmann, M. A. In 5 volumes, 16mo. E. P. Dutton & Co. Per vol., 50 cts. Oxford Poets. New and cheaper editions, comprising: The Poetical Works of William Wordsworth, edited by Thomas Hutchinson; The Poetical Works of Lord Byron; The Poet- ical Works of Sir Walter Scott, edited by J. Logie Robertson; The Complete Works of William Shakespeare, edited by W. J. Craig. Each with portrait. Oxford University Press. DRAMA AND VERSE. The Shadow Garden, and Other Plays. By Madison Cawein. 12mo, 259 pages. G. P. Putnam's Sons. $1.50 net. Flays. By Mrs. W. K. Clifford. 12mo, 329 pages. Mitchell Keunerley. $1.50 net. The Frozen Grail, and Other Poems. By Elsa Barker. 12mo, 125 pages. Duffield & Co. $1.25 net. Russian Lyrics: Songs of Cossack, Lover, Patriot, and Peasant. By Martha Gilbert Dickinson Bianchi. 12mo. 139 pages. Duffield & Co. $1.20 net. Songs of Cheer. By John Kon drink Bangs, l2no, 64 pages. Sherman, French & Co. $1. net. Thirty-Six Poems. By James Elroy Fletcher. 8vo. 70 pages. London: Adelphi Press. Thysia: An Elegy. With frontispiece, 16mo, 56 pages. Mitchell Kennerley. $1. net. Dreams. By Louise Cann Ranum. 12mo, 46 pages. Boston: Poet Lore Co. $1. FICTION. Fortune. By J. C. Snaith. 12mo. 358 pages. Moffat, Yard & Co. $1.50. The Undesirable Governess. By F. Marion Crawford. Illustrated, 12mo, 227 pages. Macmillan Co. $1.50. The Right Stuff. By Ian Hay. With frontispiece. 12mo, 314 pages. Houghton Mifflin Co. $1.20 net. The Girl from the Marsh Croft. By Selma Lagerloff: trans- lated by Velma Swanston Howard. 12mo, 277 pages. Little. Brown, & Co. $1.50. A Marriage under the Terror. By Patricia Wentworth. 12mo, 384 pages. G. P. Putnam's Sons. $1.85 net. Danbury Rodd, Aviator. By Frederick Palmer. Illustrated, 12mo. 810 pages. Charles Scribner's Sons. $1.50. The Emigrant Trail. By Geraldine Bonner. With frontis- piece in color, 12mo, 496 pages. Duffield A Co. $1.50. Studies in Wives. By Mrs. Belloc Lowndes. 12mo, 318 pages. Mitchell Kennerley. $1.50. The Master Girl: A Romance. By Ashton Hilliers. 12mo. 245 pages. G. P. Putnam's Sons. $1.25 net. The Twisted Foot. By Henry Milner Rideout. Illustrated, 12mo, 248 pages. Houghton Mifflin Co. $1.20 net. The Ramrodders. By Holman Day. With frontispiece. Unto, 353 pages. Harper & Brothers. $1.50. The Illustrious Prinoe. By E. Phillips Oppenbeim. Illus- trated, 12mo, 823 pages. Little, Brown, & Co. $1.50. Mademoiselle Celeste: A Romance of the French Revolu- tion. By Adele Ferguson Knight. With frontispiece in color, 12mo, 322 pages, George W. Jacobs & Co. $1.50. The Early Bird: A Business Man's Love Story. By George Randolph Chester. Illustrated in tint. 12mo. 280 pages. Bobbs-Merrill Co. $1.50. An American Baby Abroad. By Mrs. Charles N. Crewdson. Illustrated. 12mo. 328 pages. Little, Brown, & Co. $1.50. The Innocent Murderers. By William Johnston and Paul West. With frontispiece, 12mo. 844 pages. Duffield & Co. $1.50. The Sheriff of Dyke Hole. A Story of a Montana Mining Camp. By Ridgwell Cullum. With frontispiece in color, l2me, 447 pages. George W. Jacobs & Co. $1.50. The Man Higher Up. By Henry Russell Miller. Illustrated. 12mo. 402 pages. Bobbs-Merrill Co. $1.50. An Army Mule. By Charles Miner Thompson. Illustrated in tint, 12mo. 194 pages. Houghton Mifflin Co. $1. net. Royal Lovers: The Adventures of Two Empresses. By Helene Vacaresco. 12mo. 307 pages. John Lane Co. $1.50. The Daughters of Suffolk. By William Jasper Nicolla. Illustrated, 12mo. 333 pages. J. B. Lippincott Co. $1.50. Ragna. By Madame Anna Costantini. 12mo. 401 pages. Sturgis £ Walton Co. $1.50. The American In Paris: A Biographical Novel of the Franco- Prussian War. By Eugene Coleman Savidge. Third edition; 8vo, 278 pages. J. B. Lippincott Co. $1.50. Our Lady of Darkness. By Albert Dorrington and A. G. Stephens. Illustrated, 12mo, 371 pages. MacaulayCo. $1.50. Just Horses. By Bewell Ford. Illustrated, 12mo, 198 pages. Mitchell Kennerly. $1. net. A Dilemma: A Story of Mental Perplexity. By Leon Idas Andreiyeff; translated by John Cournos. l2mo, 114 pages. Philadelphia : Brown Brothers, $1. Montes the Matador, and Other Stories. By Frank Harris. 12mo, 264 pages. Mitchell Kennerley. $1. net. A Saint of the Twentieth Century. By Fannie Bond Rice. 12mo, 808 pages. Richard G. Badger. $1.50. The Angel of Lonesome Hill: A Story of a President. By Frederick Landis. With frontispiece, 16mo. 40 pages. Char