y. His conception of poetry is that of the Jews: poetry is a message, and iS6 August 23 THE DIAL art is merely the instrument to make it heard. He is a teacher, a preacher, a prophet, and his work is compared to the Psalms, to Jeremiah, to the Song of Songs, to the Book of Job. And yet Mr. Unter- meyer assures us that Mr. Oppenheim's poetry is American. Let us turn back to the preface, and note the following remark: "Until recently our paintings had filled endless galleries with placid ar- rangements of Greek nudes, Italian skies, and French theories." If it be bad for America to follow a French theory in painting, why is it not bad to follow a Semitic theory in poetry? Surely one is bad as the other, and Mr. Oppenheim's poetry, far from being the imposing native structure which Mr. Untermeyer says it is, is merely academic balder- dash. Further along we are offered this character- istic sample of it: Who buried Atlantis And devoured Egypt? Into what jaws has Athens gone? Galley slave and Agamemnon, the great king, are shoveled under, And the girl who combed the hair of Helen is dust with her golden mistress Cities of great pride, with their multitudes, Have gone down, And spring that called out the boy Dante into the streets of Florence, Silent when Beatrice walked, Opens wild roses in the ruins over the dead The snows where Saga heroes fought Melted with those warriors, And the desert girls of Arabia are only an echo in our brains. The same great war; the same great urge; the same birth and death Are kisses sweeter than in Carthage, Is failure more bitter than on the hill of Gethsemane, Has death lost its sting since Rachel? It is noteworthy that in all this long, verbose catalogue of names Mr. Oppenheim does not men- tion a single one that might in any way identify his work or interests with America. Had he written Montezuma instead of Agamemnon, or the Aztecs instead of Egypt, we would at least have known that he was aware of America's early existence. But neither in these lines, nor in all the three hundred and fifty pages of Mr. Untermeyer's book, is there one word about the American Indian, or about American Indian Poetry. A strange omis- sion. . . . Turn to the chapter on Miss Lowell. Here Mr. Untermeyer exalts his subject's range, her diversity, her temerity in experiment. We are told that she is capable of writing in every form from strict met- rical stanzas to "futuristic" verslibres, from vers- libres to polyphonic prose, from polyphonic prose to an interspersing of verslibres and polyphonic—a style which Mr. Untermeyer does not dignify with a title, but which should perhaps be called "poly- versphonlibristic". Not a word here about the mis- sion of the poet as a social reformer, of which we hear so much in the chapters on Oppenheim, Gio- vanitti, Wood, and even Vachel Lindsay. On the contrary, we are told quietly that Miss Lowell is content to be the poet, rather than the prophet. Not a word here about the possible influence of Miss Lowell's New England ancestry upon the spirit of revolt latent in her poetry; though Robert Frost who is far less characteristic of New England in his personality than Miss Lowell, is highly praised for having absorbed New England in his poetry. Therefore, Robert Frost is an American poet be- cause he writes of New England; Miss Lowell is one also because she gives us scientific experiments in form. Mr. Oppenheim is one also because he holds the Jewish attitude toward art. There is but one thing which can be said about such a method of criticism. Mr. Untermeyer has omitted to mention Sir William Watson as an American poet, despite his sonnet on President Wilson; he ignores Swinburne as an American poet, despite that poet's attitude to Walt Whitman. If Mr. Unter- meyer's errors of judgment are thus apparent at the outset of his enterprise, what can be said on the matter of his minor points, his detail, his style? Nothing—or rather, everything. In such a welter of absurdities one does not know where to begin. Let us note, for instance, the space Mr. Untermeyer gives to certain poets. Conrad Aiken, for instance, is relegated to the minors, and is given seven and a half pages of grudging admission and unmeasured denunciation, including a severe examination of his early verses—a proceeding Mr. Untermeyer wisely omits in the case of Frost. And at the same time, Mr. Untermeyer gives fifteen pages to an apologia for John Hall Wheelock, in which that author's later sins are forgiven for the sake of two or three of his early poems. Or take another point, Mr. Untermeyer's total lack of any sense of humor. For instance, he solemnly discusses both Mr. Witter Bynner and Mr. Bynner's alter ego, "Emmanuel Morgan," the leader of the Spectrists, without mak- ing the one remark that anyone would expect him to make in the circumstances: that Mr. " Morgan" was both amusing and readable, whereas Mr. Byn- ner is not. As for the English in which this book is written, it is indescribable. Mr. Untermeyer is not content with the vocabulary of Shakespeare and the structure of Addison. He introduces new instruments into the orchestra, and combines them in a new way. But after all, this new art is fairly familiar to our ears. We can hear its counterpart already in the performances of any Jazz band. John Gould Fletcher. THE DIAL \ FORTNIGHTLY The Old Order and the New In Europe the embryo League of Nations threatens with starvation and tempts with food the revolutionists who will not obey its mandates. In Washington Mr. Wilson makes the acceptance of the League a condition precedent to the lowering of the cost of living. He promises to do a number of things to solve the food problem, but assures the people that even though he exerts himself to the utmost the situation can not be relieved until the Covenant is signed and the direction of the world is formally handed over to the corporation formed at Paris. It is disheartening but true that there are still people in the United States who take Mr. Wilson at his word. We might remind the credu- lous that the promise about the packers has been made by other presidents whose reputation for obligations fulfilled was at least as good as Mr. Wilson's. But up to date every attempt at reform has left the packers and the other trustees of the commonwealth as well placed as ever for continu- ing their work of plunder. We would like to submit further that Mr. Wilson's failure to carry on business in the open with the diplomats of Europe gives small promise that he will deal openly and successfully with Mr. Armour, Mr. Morgan, Mr. Schwab and Mr. Rockefeller. As for hoarding: if there ever was a time in our history when hoarding should have been prevented it was while the world war was in progress. It was not prevented then and it will not be prevented now. A feint in this direction will- doubtless be made, but it is incon- ceivable that either the President, Congress, the state legislatures, or the courts will support the radical and necessary remedy of confiscation and public sale. That would be going the Bolsheviki and our own I.W.W.'s one better, and making functionaries of tie state liable to imprisonment or deportation. Surely there is no one who, out of respect for the President's " lofty principle," will take seriously his program for the handling of the living-cost issue. Some few may even recognize that the cost of living •s very likely to fall of itself before long. If the phenomenal decline in the rate of foreign exchange serves to check exports and thereby to increase domestic supply and to lower prices, Mr. Wilson will be in a position to reap the credit. It will not matter that by the sabotage of production and the control of distribution the manufacturers and deal- ers will be able in a short time to restore prices to the level most profitable to them. For the public the obvious fact will be that Mr. Wilson presented the country with a program—and ipso facto prices fell. The Wadsworth Bill, the extreme stbi» taken by our liberal administration, should disillu- sion liberals everywhere. Drawn by the Generul Staff, at the dictation of an alleged " pacifist " sec- retary of war, the bill is a complete betrayal of liberalism at a moment when scarcely another important Government in the world dares take up the issue of conscription. Its real objective is not military training but a military establishment. This it approaches deviously, seductively, behind the rela- tively innocent-looking wedge of a three-months' training period for youths of nineteen. Although the newspaper reports are inadequate to disclose the precise interrelation of the details of this proposal, nobody who has had any army experience can be deceived into thinking that three months of training will accomplish more than the initiation and enrollment of recruits. Either the two-year reserve clause means a two-year liability to training in case war should arise, or else the General Staff eon- templates sending green boys into action as Jirst replacements for regulars. Even Secretary Baker claims for so short a period little more than that it will "secure a careful stock-taking" of the physical condition of our youth and that it is not too brief to instill "habits of orderliness, coordina- tion, and self-care "—that is, such habits ns salut- ing, performing the manual of arms, and rolling blankets. The physical effect of such drill is utmost negligible. In short, the three-months clause is sugar on the pill offered to hostile public opinion, The proposal as a whole is unjust in that, besides establishing inequality between the new conscripts and the regulars they must serve with, it ullowi them no pay above maintenance and live dollars monthly "for incidentals," seems to prefer post ponement of training to providing for their depend- ents, and carries no recognition of conscientious scruples. That it is "stripped of all vocational or other educational features" clinches the fnct of its militaristic intentions. The bill even subsidizes the exemption and appeal boards with a provision for ten dollars pay daily, so that we may enjoy the European blessing of a professional sub-army of procurers. And finally, by way of imperialist overtone, it extends its benefits to ilawaiians and Porto Ricans! The military establishment that is the real objec- tive of the Wadsworth Bill would multiply our old standing army by five, and give us a peace foot- ing of 510,000 enlisted men, a war nucleus of 1,250,000 men for quick mobilization (of whom at least half would have had only three r" > i58 August 23 THE DIAL training), a two-year reserve class of 1,200,000 more, and after that our full man-power resources under the Selective Service Act, which the bill would establish in immediate force whenever we should declare war. Two and a half million "soldiers" subject to call before we need invoke the draft—an imperial picture! In peace times, according to the Chief of Staff, this would cost us some $900,000,000 annually. Lest that sum stagger us a little in view of our war debts, our othei taxes, and our present weather eye upon the high cost of living, he added that only $94,066,500 of it would be demanded by the three-months' train- ing course itself, which could be purchased at $144.75 per capita, the balance going into the peace- time upkeep of the standing army. But observe, whither you are led by the simple little proposal to give an annual three-months outing to nineteen-year- old boys! Xhe announcement that the Military Intelligence Service would be maintained for the duration of the peace preceded by a few weeks the plea for an expanded military establishment. It is by the terms of these definite announcements of policy that the vague promise of disarmament contained in the Covenant must be gauged. Political exploita- tion and military mastery proceed hand in hand under the League: that institution is to bring not peace but a sword. Jointly the armies of the League will be used against the disaffected populations of "backward," communist states; .separately they will be used against the enemy at home—that is, the underlying population. The Prussic State was weak in verbal idealism. It made the supreme sacrifice in order that its spirit, wrapped in the heavy armor of pious aspiration, might conquer the governments of the world. - With Wilson playing an amiable Alex- ander I to Glemenceau's Metternich, the first act of the drama of counter-revolution has ended in a brilliant triumph for the Holy Alliance. The his- tory of the pacification of Hungary, now accom- plished, is neither very long nor very difficult to understand; and it illustrates very admirably the manner in which bread and bullets may influence the self-determination of a free people. In a speech delivered in Paris towards the end of July, Herbert C. Hoover, Food Dictator for the Allies, remarked that officials of the Relief Commission were main- taining and managing some eighteen separate gov- ernments—eighteen well nourished centers of anti- Bolshevism. A few days later (July 26), the Allies offered to give Hungary a place in Mr. Hoover's bread line on condition that the Soviet government be overthrown. Unfortunately the attention of the communist officials was centered for the time being upon military operations against the most honest of Mr enemies—the Roumanians. Meanwhile Cap- tain Gregory, an American now functioning as chief Allied bread baiter for central Europe, dangled be- fore Budapest a most generous offer of food—to be had at a price. The combined attack of Roumanian arms and Allied intrigue was too much for Bela Kun; on August 31 his government was overthrown. The Associated Press dispatch that announced the debacle at Budapest proudly pointed out that Cap- tain Gregory should be " credited with a large share in the hastening of Bela Kun's retirement." In the face of a feeble and obviously insincere protest from the Supreme Council at Paris, the Roumanian army now overran Hungary, occupied the capital, and created conditions that made easy the strangula- tion of the new bourgeois-Socialist government, the return of the emigres, and the complete work- ing out of the counter-revolution. With the Supreme Council still uttering stage thunders against Roumania, Archduke Joseph, "the most popular member of the Hapsburg family," dumped the ad interim cabinet into the discard and became Regent of Hungary. The sincerity of the Allied promises to the first anti-communist government may be judged from the fact that on the day of the Haps- burg coup d'etat the members of Entente mission conferred with the Archduke, reached " a full agree- ment" with him on various matters, and ended by delegating governmental authority to this new Dictator. 1 HE NATURE OF AMERICAN ACTIVITIES IN Hungary is easily understood when published facts are once gathered together. Information relative to counter-revolutionary operations in Finland and Russia is not so easily obtainable; an interview pub- lished in the Soumen Sosialidemokraatti, a Finnish newspaper, may therefore be regarded as "a piece of preciosity." The speakers are, first, a Finnish newspaper reporter; second, Magnus Swenson, sometime of Madison, Wisconsin, more recently Inter-Allied Food Dictator for Scandinavia and Finland. To quote: "Is it true," I [the reporter] asked, "that our getting foodstuffs depends to some extent on the political system of our country." "Yes. You know, of course, the wish of America that your country should have a democratic system and that the composition of the government should answer the party divisions in the newly elected Diet. I know that condi- tions here are not quite satisfactory as yet, but I am sure that everything will be all right very soon. I feel sure that the people of Finland under all circmstances are able to take care of themselves. But we have another dan- ger before us. America and the Entente powers regard the Bolsheviki of Russia as enemies of mankind. The position of your country would become very difficult, and your relations to the Entente countries would perhaps become impossible, if the Bolsheviki should get into power here." "Do you believe that Finland would be permitted even formally to make peace with the Russian Soviet Republic?" "I am no politician and I cannot give you any definite answer about that. Nevertheless, I believe, that the En- tente powers would not approve of such a peace at this time. In regard to the" food problem, which is the only question within my jurisdiction, I believe it would not be igig *59 THE DIAL as easy to arrange for food relief in case you would start negotiations with the present Russian Government." 1 understand that this a very delicate point. . . . The problem is by no means of a purely humantarian character—the delivery of the Finnish people from star- vation. Rather the object is to make Finland's policies com- pletely dependent on the policy of the western imperialists, and to compel the Finnish people to remain in a state of war with the Russian Soviet Republic. I If any stimulus was needed to stiffen the Bolshevist resistance to the attacks of the Allied imperialist combine, the new developments in Hungary have supplied this stimulus. Seen for what it is, the Betrayal of Budapest will bring to the Russian people, and to the enemies of imperial- ism everywhere, not the valor of desperation but courage confident of victory. At Budapest the Allies showed their hand. What they would do only too gladly by force alone, they are now com- pelled to do in part by trickery. Diplomacy and dollars still move at the command of governments that can no longer trust their troops. The armies of Western Europe and America are being called home by the will of the people; but the work of counter-revolution is being carried on, not now with the people's manhood, but still with the people's money. Has the time not come then to put to the people of America a simple question: "You have bought; the bonds of your government; you have pledged generous aid to starving humanity in Europe; but do you want your money used to finance a food relief scheme that is doing the revolt- ing work you will not let your army do?" The press hails with joy the failure of the proletariat in Europe to get action on Russia and to get it by the direct method. If the facts in the situation were followed with a desire to Unearth the truth it is possible that a fair conclusion would be that the direct action policy of the workers has already accomplished as much to prevent the exten- sion of intervention in Russian affairs as diplomacy in Paris has accomplished in the defeat of Soviet government. A final decision has not been reached in England as to whether the workers will or will not strike against the government's Russian policy. The matter is to be referred to a trade union con- gress. On July 31 it was reported from" London that the Government was to proceed immediately with the withdrawal of the British forces from North Russia. Several days earlier Mr. Asquith had been moved to say: I regard with bewilderment and apprehension the part this country is playing in Russia. The country wants a clearer definition than it has yet been given of what are our commitments, definite and prospective. I surely hope that the attempt to commit us further in Russia will be successfully resisted. The future government of Russia is a matter to be settled by the Russian people and no one else. The economic condition of the world and of our country was never more menacing. We hope that the trade unionists in casting their vote will accept these remarks of Mr. Asquith as a challenge to them to block the policy of the Coalition Government, announced by Mr. Chamberlain, "to continue economic aid and a powerful contribution of munitions to Denikin." What these British workers will still do in regard to Russia is an open question. But what the Italian workers have accomplished in forcing action upon their govern- ment is a matter of history. All that was needed there to bring the government to terms was the adoption of a resolution to strike. We take this opportunity to reprint the resolution of the Italian seamen, as it has received scant notice. It is one of the most striking proofs we have that there is in Europe a labor group with international sympathies. It runs: x All the crews of Italian steamers are disposed to go to prison or be sent to the bottom of the harbor with their steamers rather than allow themselves to contribute to the defeat of the Russian people's revolution. We are con- vinced that such a defeat would mean the defeat of labor everywhere. We invite all other labor organizations, especially seamen, to boycott all steamers chartered by international capitalism agaipst the Workers' International which is now massing its Red vanguards on the battle- fields of revolutionary Russia. The war went too far—millions of men and billions of dollars too far. The Supreme Council admits it when it goes about rebuilding what the war pulled down at such a heavy cost in blood and treasure. A monopoly of ruling-class privileges was the reward expected by the victors; actually they have fallen heir to a revolution that threatens the destruction of the very system of privilege. It is the fear of this universal cataclysm that sets the Supreme Council seeking allies among its bitterest enemies of a year ago. With the defeat of Germany the fears and animosities that so recently divided Europe into two rival political sys- tems lost most of their significance; since that time the fear of the social revolution has tended more and more to replace the old national and dynastic rivalries. The Treaty is the product of the nationalistic system that gave the conqueror the right to grind his defeated rival into the dust. But the counter-revolutionary activities of the Allied pow-ers are of a different order; they belong not to the war of nations but to the class struggle that divides Europe horizontally and gives the lie to nationalism at the very moment when the war has brought it to the height of its development. Man- nerheim oi Finland, Kolchak of Russia, and Joseph of Austria have profited in turn by the new diplo- macy that joins dollars and dynasties in the defense of privilege. With these alliances of desperation threatened by the rising tide of revolt, how long will it be before the Supreme Council is compelled to acknowledge that from the point of view of the ruling class the war that started the revolution was a mistake? i6o August 23 THE DIAL Casual Comment The war and its outcome have thrown the world into a welter of political thought and action, inevitably at the expense of interest in the creative arts. Speculation has seized upon this fact; by consequence each day adds a chapter to the discus- sion of what-is-most-worth-while-anyhow. One of these commentaries—a foundling .editorial sheltered by a respectable weekly—finds good counsel in the past. Look, says the writer, at the Revolutionary Age of a hundred years ago. Where is Marat, killed miserably in his bath, and Charlotte Corday, silent now as her great bloodguilty victim. Where is the giant Danton, and Robespierre, Highpriest of Reason, burned in his own sacrificial fires. Among them all there is no voice speaking in an age that yet hears Schiller and Goethe, Bach, who came before, and Chopin, who came after. These men lived somewhat apart from the hot passions of their time; and as they stood, so their work stands today—" above the battle." Without deny- ing the fact that individual achievement in the arts is kindlier treated by the years than is any great accomplishment in politics, we may yet dispute the frequent corollary—that in the arts is all perma- nence and perfection, in politics nothing but tempo- ral futility. It is easy—and inane—to confuse the everlasting with the ever visible. Art builds up, toward the sun. A painting or a poem or a sym- phony that achieves greatness at the same time achieves individuality towering above temporal horizons. The great works that follow after must build anew for themselves; behind them stand always the monuments of the Masters. But the type of thought that organizes and moves humanity in its daily tasks must build foundation- wise, flat upon the earth. To move the masses of men, thought must be not too lofty and individual- istic, but simple and capable of being readily under- stood by the common run of humanity. Among prophets, one speaks too loftily, and has no audience but oblivion; another turns to brutalities, leads the mob, is trampled by the madness he sets loose; a third talks simply of things that most men see the good of, and perhaps arouses action a continent wide. Oblivion takes them all—the dreamer, the demagogue, the leader of men. It often takes the last sooner than the others: reforms once achieved become a commonplace; and the reformer, because of the practical turn that made leadership possible, too often turns conservator of what has been won; the political revolutionist may be the bitterest enemy of the communist, who nevertheless builds upon the political foundations and eventually hides them alto- gether from view. Thus in the group affairs of humanity what is best done is soonest out of date. The political past shows no long monumented corri- dors of beauty. The present is the mob-trampled foundation of the future. What was, is forgotten; what is, is not enough; what is to be will hide the -1 achievements of the present. The way maps are used in current war- books and histories is not calculated to increase respect for the geographic disciplines. Their func- tion is formal and decorative. They run concur- rently with the text and now and again break into the solid blackness of the printed page; but at best their success is typographic rather than topographic, artistic and not scientific. Even from the point of view of simple draughtsmanship the mean specimen is an affront to the one or two rules of cartography which every writer who must handle geographic data should be acquainted with. First, as to posi- tion. It is unpardonable, in the eyes of most geographers, to exhibit a section of territory with- out noting its latitude and longitude; for it is by these notations that any particular map may be re- ferred to with convenience on any other map. Most writers have a heavy score against them on this count. The second requirement is intelligibility. Von Humboldt, we believe, laid down the maxim that a map should tell but a single story and do so selectively, without confusing the reader's percep- tions with a number of other considerations. Thus if the author is depicting the lineup of the opposing forces in an engagement involving the capture and occupation of three towns and five villages, the best practice is to show these critical centers alone, with- out respect to the fifty other places which happen to be set down on the official maps of the region. Especially should this practice be followed when the map deals with a short sector of conflict, and is reduced to the scale of a half-inch equals two miles. To copy the details of the full scale military map is to court illegibility and marry confusion. A map to be studied by an experienced student may be pretty heavily studded with diverse kinds of data; but a map that accompanies a text is meant to be read like the text, and it is only by being drawn with a single eye to the point to be illuminated that it can become anything better than a decoratibn. Most authors however flounder helplessly in the hands of some un- interested map publisher or draughtsman, ignorant of the possibilities they fail to exploit. What geo- graphic training might give them, a glance at Mr. H. J. Mackinders' Democratic Ideals and Reality (Holt) would show. His rough but suggestive maps are worth a whole atlas of more literal illus- trations whose accuracy is no recompense for their ineffectualness and sterility. The trick of toying with an idea until it suggests another, and then of toying with that until it suggests a third, and so on indefinitely, is by no means the exclusive possession of the after dinner speaker. There are any number of essayists who let this indolent device serve them as the basis of tech- nique, enabling them' to be prolific as well as leisurely, although we recall no more faithful ex- ponent of it than F. W. Boreham, who lives in Aus- tralia, and from that vantage spot strews his ideas in fragrant bunches upon the face of the earth. Six 1919 161 THE DIAL of these bunches have now been imported by the Abingdon Press (New York), bearing titles as fol- lows: The Golden Milestone, The Silver Shadow, The Luggage of Life, Mountains in the Mist, Mushrooms on the Moor, Faces in the Fire. The boyish pastime of skipping stones across the surface of a pond furnishes a true parallel for the method of these sketches. Mr. Boreham may or may not have indulged this sport in youth, but there can be no question but that he has absorbed its tech- nique to guide what he chooses to term a " truant pen" through the mazes of "its inordinate gar- rulity." The essays present themselves as exercises in seeing how many orderly mental "skips" can be secured from one throw across the placid pond of a conventional mind. Remarkable results may be ob- tained thus by simply drawing each sentence out of the tail of its predecessor, after the manner of the orator who counts upon interlocking anecdotes to conceal a mental blank. Not infrequently the final word of -a sentence may be made by the propeling force of an entire new paragraph, and so by easy stages an entire essay evolved. As a natural corollary of his method, the author revels in diversity. There is scarcely an imaginable conventional theme which does not bob up on one or another of the 1650 odd pages. "Have I written on earthquakes, weddings, sermons, and similar vol- canic disturbances? I think not," he remarks at the beginning of one essay—and then hastens to re- pair the omission. That, undoubtedly, is why there are six of these volumes. lOETRY WRITTEN DURING THE WAR IS TINGED with the reflected light of the conflict even when it is not wrapped in the martial colors. War's emo- tional reactions linger like an afterglow when the sun itself has departed. From Forward March (Lane) to Rediscoveries (Cornhill) one runs the martial gauntlet, now thwacked by the club of patri- otism or again barbed by the spear of satire. In Rediscoveries Richard D. Ware has the bear- ing of the worldly and professional sarcast, and by means of a sardonic inflection and the bizarre empha- sis that the free verse arrangement can be made to give, he makes a fairly sharp impression. The net effect, however, is weakened by lack of originality and a tendency toward safety in his choice of topics. His targets are the too common butts of reprobation —the suffragette, the pacifist, the Germans—cruci- fied with platitudes. Such poetry is as weak as the mood that provokes it. Forward March by Angela Morgan testifies to a liberated spirit. Her readiness knows few nega- tions, no distinctions, never a doubt. The wells of her facility are unsealed by such an embracing confidence in the universe as is not everyday in this time of limited capacities. She is more con- vinced than anybody of God and the people, ser- mons in stones, and good in everything recon- structive. In Mr. Hagedorn's Hymn of Free Peoples Triumphant (Macniillan) the note of deliverance, the depth, the panorama, the vibrations of solem- nity, the profound assurance, the sense of menace, the zeal, all recall Old Testament Hosannahs. Yet despite these studious echoes and despite the greater fact that it draws breath and is dramatic in its own right, it is a closet hymn, to be read by the free peoples and not chanted—perhaps the free peoples of today do not know how to chant. This constructed language could not be expected to have the wild energy.that burst abroad in the days of Elijah; there has been no such energy in modern times except per- haps Carlyle's. The war itself could not unleash that which the poet had not originally stored up. The brevity, the qualities, the finish of War Poems (Yale University Press) come unexpectedly from a book of war verse. Their maturity is only slightly involved in chauvinism and jingles. Their preoccupations are inward and with the thought of fortitude and losing, with the reverberations of war in the heart, with the inevitable but never quite trite reflections on mortality that war brings to mind. They show several degrees of approach to finality: they range in authorship from John Finley to John Masefield and Robert Frost, whose Not to Keep is the ranking piece of the volume. Prized and studied simplicity of idiom and quiet maturity of mood are the claims of this book to recommen- dation. Of a different mood, more close to the realism of the fighting man, is En Repos and Elsewhere Over There by Lansing Warren and Robert A. Donaldson (Houghton Mifflin). Here the routine of death and destruction is handled in a humorous and soldierly manner—perhaps the only manner that could bring a fighting man sane through war. In general the humor is that of the jolly undertakers— hut for the authors, as for the safe civilian, neither routine nor good humor can be stretched to cover the wide panorama of war seen at a distance. In the words of the most aspiring phrase in the volume, the struggle demands "an Iliad of the Western World." If En Repos does not give us the desired Iliad, it is yet a book worth looking casually into. EDITORS John Dewey Martyn Johnson Robert Morss Lovett Helen Marot Thorstein Veblen Clarence Britten, Associate 162 August 23 THE DIAL Communications American Money and Kolchak. Propaganda Sir: While the Lusk Committee and various "investigators" are excited to the point of hysteria because certain groups friendly to the Soviet Gov- ernment are spending money in this country for the purpose of placing facts before the American people, no one seems to have inquired as to the enormous expenditures made by the Kolchak propagandists. Where has Mr. A. Sack of the Russian Infor- mation Bureau obtained the money for his exten- sive campaign of misinformation? Full-page ad- vertisements have appeared in various newspapers, and the Kolchak weekly, Struggling Russia, has been published necessarily at great expense. Is it true that the money being used in this propaganda is a portion of that granted by the American Gov- ernment to the Russian Government out of the proceeds of the sale of war bonds? In 1917 there was granted by the United States to Russia- a credit of about $300,000,000. At the time of Kerensky's fall about $135,000,000 of this loan had been expended. What has become of the remainder? Was it left in the hands of Mr. Bakhmeteff, Kerenskj's Ambassador to the United States? And is not the Russian Information Bureau a branch of that Embassy and are not its officials still on the Embassy pay-roll? If this be the case, is not American money being used in America for propaganda on behalf of the Kolchak regime? Boston, Mass. R. P. Ross. Indian Melodists and Mr. Untermeyer Sir: There are several ways of reviewing books; one may be captious, laudatory, or dispassionate. The critic should at least be reasonably fair. Mr. Untermeyer in his review of The Path on the Rain- bow, the Book of Indian Poems (Boni & Live- right), has made a rather serious indictment of its editor, one which compels that individual to emerge in self-defense from what the critic evidently con- siders a purely nebulous state, and take up arms in his own behalf. The case against the book consists of the follow- ing counts: that a so-called Indian croon alleged to have been translated by Carl Sandburg is, in reality, not Indian in origin at all; therefore, there is a strong likelihood of other inclusions being of questionable authenticity. To the first part of this count I plead guilty, the designation "translation" being a typographical error, resulting from the fact that the Table of Contents was the only part of the book which it was impossible for me to read in proof. Since the poem was reprinted by permission from Poetry Magazines where its authorship would be known to readers of that magazine, my good faith in the matter need not, I trust, be seriously ques- tioned. An investigation of the sources of the book will show that I have made every effort to dis- tinguish between genuine literal translations and those poems which I have grouped under the head of Interpretations wherein the approach is through a medium not Indian; and there is not one of the aforesaid translators who is not an accepted authority on ethnology. To the second count, that it was unwise to in- clude in the Interpretations the "sentimental jin- gling" of the poems by Miss Johnson1 (Tekashion- weke), it must be confessed that it was against the judgment of the editor and only in deference to the wishes of the publishers, who argued the great popularity of that poet's works in Canada and else- where that inclusion was made. The poems in question show how far the Indian poet strays from her own primitive tribal songs, when attempting the White Man's mode. But then one must concede something to one's publishers! There remain the questions of footnotes and of the value of some of the songs themselves. Mr. Untermeyer seems to be bewildered by the absence of notes to such a song as this: Maple sugar is the only thing that satisfies me. It is so unintelligible, inconsequential . . . dressed in its absurd pretentious vers libre make-up! But when Mrs. Austin explains the'primitive back- ground, the thing at once becomes illuminating and satisfying. "Ten thousand American boys in a foreign land singing Home Sweet Home is a very moving thing, and twice ten Indians at the ragged end of Winter, when the food goes stale and their very garments smell of wood smoke, singing their maple sugar song might sing a great deal of poetry into it—poetry of rising sap, clean snow water, calling partridge, and the friendly click of brass bowls and birch-bark sap buckets." Mr. Unter- meyer would like to have all the poems similarly bulwarked by picturesque explanatory matter. You see, the real secret of the poetry of the above song is, that the Indians are hungry, hungry for maple sugar. To critics who have lost their primi- tive gusto for maple sugar that sensation may well be a riddle. Well, we might take another song: Oh Oh Oh I am thinking I am thinking I have found my lover I think it is so. We might add the proper footnotes to it such as: "This song represents the yearning of the Indian maiden for her lover. Such songs are sung in the evening when the herons are flying across the wild rice. It was said that in the old davs all the love 1919 163 THE DIAL songs were associated with a man's qualifications to wed, this being determined by his success in war or in the buffalo hunt. The method of courtship was as follows:" and so forth. All this may make Mr. Untermeyer happy and contented, but person- ally I have cherished a passionate distaste for foot- notes ever since that wretched academic period when, for every line of poetry or drama read, one had to plough through a jungle of notes at the bottom of the page, or at the back of the book. It seemed to me then that there was only one creature more horrible and contemptible than the teacher who sandbagged poetry, and that was the editor who crucified it with unnecessary notes. George W. Cronyn. Oakland, California. Imagism: Original and Aboriginal Sir: Your clipping of Mr. Untermeyer's answer to my criticism on his review of The Path on the Rainbow (Boni & Liveright) seems to con- done my again insisting that even in his defense of himself Mr. Untermeyer betrays that tendency to begin his thinking at Greenwich Village or there- about, which seems to me at present the most re- grettable tendency in American literary criticism. Mr. Untermeyer speaks of the Indian verse as a "crude reduction to Imagist verse form." What I tried to say before and Mr. Untermeyer still misses, is that Indian verse form is Imagism. It was not "reduced" to that form, it was made that way originally. In its original form the Maple Sugar song reads exactly as it is written in the Anthology. It is a three phrase song literally translated by one of the most careful students of Indian poetry, Frances Dinsmore. The Indian words being longer, fill out the measure of the rhythm, and in case the words do not quite fill out the measure, the Indian poet, contrary to our mod- ern use, does not add more words, but fills in the measure with meaningless musical syllables. Miss Dinsmore's translations are ethnic rather than poetic. I do not happen to know the Chip- pewa language in which the song was originally written, but I do know the genius of Indian languages in general. They are holophrastic, that is to say, one word is actually made up of the es- sential syllables of a whole descriptive phrase. For example, there is an Algonquian word which an ethnologist would translate accurately as Dawn. But a poet would translate it no less accurately and more adequately and more Indianly as " Hither- whiteness-comes-walking." In the same manner the worjl which Miss Dinsmore translates as maple sugar, might actually have been something like this "the sweet-white-downdripping-blood-of-the-maple- tree" or "the-sweetness-which-I-draw-from-the- maple-with-my-flint-knife." Now my contention has been from the begin- ning that unless Mr. Untermeyer knew something of the genius of the aboriginal Indian language, un- less he knew something of Imagism besides what it looks like on paper, he had no right to review this book. Certainly he had no right to condemn it because it does not come within his notion of what poetry is in New York today. I admit the errors in editing the book, and particularly I admit my own liability to err in a subject so broad and so little studied, but I deny Mr. Untermeyer's right to ob- ject to the inclusion of particular poems in the book because they do not please him. Many Indian poems are banal, many are " jinglingly sentimental" as he describes Miss Johnson's Paddle Song, albeit Miss Johnson is, I understand, the only contribut- ing translator with Indian blood, and probably closer than any of us to the genuine poetic values of what she translates. Mr. Untermeyer must forgive me if he, as the more conspicuous figure, has drawn my fire. He is not the only poet who has reviewed the book under the impression that Imagism was invented in West Twenty-Third Street and perfected in Chicago. Santa Fe, N. M. Mary Austin. [Editor's Note: The Editors regret that press- ure of space on this department compels them to announce this discussion of Mr. Untermeyer's re- view as closed.] Contributors Ben Legere began his career in the labor world as a machinist. Later he became editor of a work- man's paper, and wrote a play called Hunger. During the period of the general strike he visited Winnipeg and other Canadian cities. Phillips Russell is a former newspaper editor with metropolitan experience. He has written extensively on labor problems. Herbert Gerhard Bruncken is a contributor to verse magazines and author of Our Lady of the Night, and Other Poems (1915). The other contributors to this issue have previ- ously written for The Dial. We are compelled to warn our readers against the activities of fraudulent solicitors who have been collecting money for subscriptions to The Dial and neg- lecting to make remissions to this office. The Dial has no subscription solicitors in any part of the country. Subscribers should deal with this office direct, or with well known and reputable agencies. We shall deem it a favor if readers approached by canvassers pretending to represent The Dial will send us descriptions of such persons. 164 August 23 THE DIAL Notes on New Books Samurai Trails. By Lucian Swift Kirtland. 300 pages. Doran. It cannot be insisted too strongly that peace will never be kept between two countries who do not un- derstand each other. Agitators still talk of a war between the United States and Japan. There is no reason for anything so foolish or fatal, except ignor- ance—ignorance of each other's methods of thinking and living. The value of a man like Lafcadio Hearn is immeasurable; such people pry beneath masks, ex- plain the spiritual causes of customs, and expose the fundamental soil of humanity, which is the only ground on which a peaceful world can be established. Civilization, after all, is nothing but the sympa- thetic understanding of one's neighbor. Lucian Swift Kirtland likes Japan because it is human and full of meaning. The curious customs he sees are an intellectual stimulus, a puzzle whose solution concerns the world. He possesses that most valuable accessory of common-sense, a sense of humor—humor which transmutes an irritating inci- dent into a thing to be remembered with pleasure. He has the leisure and means to wander as he wishes, the physical strength and the adaptive personality to go where he wishes, and the taste for choosing places worth knowing. In 1914, he and a companion de- cided to wander about Japan. Later a Japanese of the samurai caste joined them. The fourth mem- ber of the party was a diabolical bicycle of native make, that almost ranks with Stevenson's Modestine. They wisely decided to avoid big cities, tourist haunts, and railroads; and the route they eventually selected was the abandoned trail upon which, be- fore the upheaval of 1868, the samurai came from Yiddo to Nakescendo—Nakescendo, whose beauty was so cherished that its ancient adorers "did not allow their artists to paint it, nor their poets to sing of it to the world," and which consequently is now unknown. Still more valuable is his easy but concentrated analysis of Japanese conventions and morals. Japan is a land of tradition; the centuries have formalized all life into system, just as their artists have forma- lized the rhythms of waves or clouds and the pat- terns of trees or rocks into unreal symbols. All these things must be patiently explained to the Occi- dent. Nitobe's Bushido and Okakura's Book of Tea have done much; nevertheless there are ex- tremely few Americans who could live in a Japan- ese household for a day without breaking at least half the rules of etiquette. The frightful matter of Japanese nakedness (or should one write "nudity?") has caused as much consternation as was caused three centuries ago in our own land, when the Jesuit priests tried to teach the American In- dian what a shameful thing self-exposure was. They succeeded so illy, that many were tempted into the heresy that the Indian could not have inherited the sin of Adam! The Japanese seem equally unim- pressionable. Kirtland solves the question to his satisfaction in a couple of pages, filled with respect for the belief of others, and a knowledge of the philosophy of clothes. The Japanese know America pretty well; but we have been far too self-concerned to make a similar effort. Those who read this book will find it amus- ing; but it is much more—it is a thoughtful and sincere commentary on Japan, excellently told, a bridge between two proud nations. American Charities. By Amos G. Warner. Revised by Mary Roberts Coolidge. 541 pages. Crowell. Amos Warner was in his day, a half a century ago, almost as much of a pioneer as the lamented Carleton Parker of our generation. The two men had much in common in their connection with the academic and industrial life of the Pacific coast, in their important but unfinished work, and their un- timely death. It is a happy thought that Carleton Parker, a generation hence, may seem as old fash- ioned as Amos Warner does today, even decked out in shreds and patches of our contemporary costume. Mrs. Coolidge, in attempting another revision of "American Charities," has set herself a well nigh impossible task. The world has moved too fast and too far since the revision of this book in 1908 and is in too transitional a stage just now for this hour to seem the one appointed for such a formula- tion. The book is hardly of sufficient contemporary interest for the general reader, but for the social worker it is instructive and entertaining—and some- what bewildering. To a reader capable of such discriminations', these variations on the theme of Warner appear to be written, as it were, in three keys at once, if such a figure is permissible. First, we distinguish the original basis of the Warner of the early nineties, discoursing on Pauperism, Insti- tutional Care, and Charity Organization Principles, then the note of the revisor's interpolation of 1908, harping on the then new and all important science of Eugenics; finally the discordant tones so in- harmonious with the old systematizations of the developing sciences of Mental and Social Hygiene, Health Insurance, and the Improvement of Indus- trial Conditions. On the whole, the point of view seems somewhat limited and the emphasis already somewhat obsolete—on old and dreary problems of institutional administration and pauperism, unillum- inated by the interpretation of modern psychology and psychiatry, with their emphasis on the indi- vidual. One puts down this book with the sense that admirable as were the motives of the revisor in devotedly attempting to perpetuate the memory of a pioneer in social work, the net result falls short of justice to a man who was a progressive spirit in his time and who if he had lived today would have written a book radically different from anything that can be made out of his work of a generation ago. 1919 165 THE DIAL The Forgotten Man and Other Essays. By W. G. Sumner. 557 pages. Yale Univer- sity Press. This is the last of four volumes in which Prof. A. G. Keller has collected the essays of his late colleague, William Graham Sumner. The present volume gircs chiefly the earlier essays; but they are marked with the vigorous realism which made Sum- ner's books outstanding contributions to the litera- ture of sociology in America. The title essay argues that most schemes for social reform amount to noth- ing more than putting into the pocket of a more or less thriftless and shiftless person part of the earn- ings of the inconspicuous person who shifts and thrifts for himself; social betterment, Sumner urges, will consist rather in the discouragement of in- competence than in the protection of its exemplers. The essay bears the stamp of its time (1883), when it was more forgivable than it is now to base one's economics on the supposition that every man is the sole arbiter of his fate, and captain of his soul. An article on The Philosophy of Strikes (1883) points out how easily raises in wages can be nullified through corporation control of prices. In general the book is a valuable aid to old people who wish to make as intelligent a defense as may be of the devil-take-the-hindmost scheme of industry in the United States of thirty years ago. The Good Man and the Good. By Mary Whiton Calkins. 210 pages. Macmillan. A time like the present, when antagonistic polit- ical and social ideals contend for mastery, offers an unusual opportunity to the moral philosopher. And Miss Calkins has written not only a timely and stimulating book, but one which, despite its brev- ity, serves to introduce the reader to its chief con- cepts, problems, and rival theories of ethical discus- sion. Her own view, although totally free from sentimentalism, is expressive of strong social con- sciousness, sympathy and imagination. And while the discussion is conducted on an intellectual plane, this is done without the sacrifice of clearness or com- mon sense. To the casual reader there are some things about the book which invite irony: her illustrations for one thing. Her young women are apt to play harps, her young men to pull the stroke oar at college, her chil- dren to play with Great Danes, her adults to work on manuscripts, make a million dollars, or contribute te campaign funds. There are golden mornings in California, tramps in the Rockies, seasons at New- port, trips abroad, surf bathing, operas, auto-trips, and so on. In a word, its stage setting suggests op- portunity, wealth, comfort—anything but squalor and struggle or even the moral conflicts of men and women as they come. One is tempted to change the title of the book to Ethics for Ladies of Leisure. To take such liberty, however, would not only be ungracious but unfair. For despite this idiosyncrasy of the author the book is a serious, straightforward presentation of a well-considered ethical standpoint, by a woman who has evidently experienced deeply, read widely, and thought with power and unusual freedom from bias. Moreover, the careful reader soon discovers that Miss Calkins is aware of facing concrete social problems, and is trying to face them; and that her theory is elaborated with direct refer- ence to questions agitating contemporary men and women. Taken together with the excellent notes appended to the body of the book, and the literature there cited or referred to, the book is one of merit. It will be of service to those who are anxious to base their moral theory upon a knowledge of rele- vant social and psychological fact. Although an ex- pert in psychology and a trained scientist, Miss Cal- kins finds it possible to vanquish the materialistic in- terpretation of social phenomena and to establish the superior claims of moral idealism. As a book written for the serious general reader as well as for the college student, and.as an incentive to thinking on problems of personal conduct and social renova- tion, it is well conceived and ably executed. The Soul of Denmark. By Shaw Desmond. 277 pages. Scribner. The neutral countries, just now, are escapes in almost as romantic a sense as the middle ages or the fictional principalities of novelists. We have a curiosity as to what existence is outside the war. The Soul of Denmark is a social critique of the Danish nation. Politics, co-operative dairying, system of high schools, fat, art, spiritual inertia, and divorce are analyzed as so many manifestations of the national temperament. The quantity and variety of observations that Mr. Desmond has been able to make and record in four years are a testi- mony to his activity and alertness, and, if occasion- ally in one's course through his pages one doubts that so many emanations could be accurately probed in so limited a time, it is a convincing portrait of the Dane that emerges from the masses of detail. Moreover, Mr. Desmond found a dramatic crisis ready to hand in the war; so that there is the thrill of the novel in the exhibition of the character of the Dane under test circumstances. Critic and skeptic, tolerant towards himself and others, inaccessible to any disturbing emotion or supersensual enthusiasm, he stands outside the war, uncomprehending, and placidly reaping its chance harvest. Like so many writers with a thesis to prove he assumes a special vocabulary. "Three-dimensional," the sixth sense, "to propogand "—he amply explains and illustrates his phrases but quotation marks follow upon the heels of capitals until one longs for a paragraph of words used in an every-day manner. But these dis- tracting mannerisms are only superficial. Mr. Desmond's passion for Georg Brandes has not been unavailing, and it is in a finely critical spirit that he has made his appraisal of the Danish soul. i66 August 23 THE DIAL Social Work. By Richard C. Cabot. 188 pages. Houghton Mifflin. Richard C. Cabot believes in social work. He seems to believe in it as a constructive part in progress. In the first he is right; so long as there is a system of economic organization that turns out people who lack opportunity, who, when any inter- ruption occurs in the undeviating program of earn- ing a living, lack funds for the barest necessities, we must provide relief, whether publicly or privately. He is right also in placing emphasis on the medical* approach to social work—it is probably the only approach that does not tend to fasten the insult of charity and subservience on the beneficiary. He is right in emphasizing the need for self-reliance and information, rather than for alms and nostrums. He is right in so far as social work is'ever right. But social work is a symptom of a great wrong: it can not, by and large, be constructive. It presupposes a state of society in which large numbers of the popu- lation will not be able to provide for themselves, educationally, medically, economically. Modern in- dustry forces the study and practise of social work as a profession. Dr. Cabot dodges this issue. He says, for instance, "Bad conditions of industry are doubtless a factor in the production of tuberculosis, but we must realize how many and important the other factors are. The eight or ten hours a person spends in industry is often a small factor in produc- ing his ill health, compared to the fourteen or six- teen hours he spends outside the industry." We should like to ask Dr.~~Cabot why workers spend their hours outside the factory in ways that are in- jurious to health. Again in his discussion of the moral poisoning of monotony he declines to meet the facts half-way. He describes the sense of injustice as "a sense that it is not right that somebody else, whom the Lord did not make very different, has so much more of money and opportunity and happi- ness than the person himself has. It is altogether a secondary question to discuss whether that is true or not. I do not myself believe that the rich are any happier than the poor. On the whole, I think the evils of money are just as great as the evils of poverty." "Can we do anything about it?" he asks. "We can help people to see things differ- ently." It is a pity that Dr. Cabot, a leader in the study and practice of social work should have so limited his horizon and his criticism to the immediate, not the fundamental causes for the necessity of relief. The See-Saw. By Sophie Kerr. 360 pages. Doubleday, Page. Here is an example of what may happen when the writer of a novel manipulates the strings with too much confidence. Miss Kerr is continually appear- ing over the heads of her chief personages, beckon- ing to the reader to share her own impregnable be- lief in the adroitness of her handiwork. Whenever she contrives a particularly smart speech to put into the mouth of one of her characters, the other person who chances to be involved in the dialogue is dele- gated to put it in italics by repeating it. Thus the philandering husband describes himself as "only imperfectly domesticated," and evokes Miss Kerr's approval in the mouth of the next speaker: "That's a wonderful description of you, Harleth. I'd never thought of you in just those words, but that's it, exactly. You're very imperfectly domesticated." After a time one begins to take exception to this repeated throwing of a sop to sophistication, and to suspect the author of sparring for cosmopolitan smartness with a boarding-school reach. Especially in such passages as this: "What is it about Leila," she asked, "that attracts men so much? She isn't clever—she isn't sweet. She isn't, when you come right down to it, so wonderfully good-looking. So far as I can see, she entirely lacks what Barrie calls 'charm,' in the usual acceptance of the word. What is it, Curt? Do you know?" "Oh, yes, I know," said Curt, dryly. "I can tell you in one word—provocation. Or, sex. I don't mean mat she's feminine—I mean that she's female." "Upon my word!" gasped Marcia. "Have you taken to reading Dreiser novels, Curt?" "I admit that I was coarse," returned Curt, calmly, helping himself to salad, "but you asked me—and I an- swered you according '0 the best of my belief and opinion." After this amazing calmness in the face of salad and sex, we were quite prepared for the further revelations of the intricate Leila, even unto her ulti- matum, which runs: "It's simply not decent to have no pearls." American Civil Church Law. By Carl Zoll- man. 473 pages. Studies in History, Economics and Public Law. Vol. (LXXVII.) Columbia University Press. The title of the series does not very clearly fit this work. It is neither history, economics, nor public law. Unmistakably it is a book on private dogmatic law. But since any somewhat complete treatment of a subject in private law necessarily must have in it something of history, a little, at least suggestively, of economics, and cannot wholly avoid some of the many phases of public law, we may overlook a mere inconsistency of form; and this is especially true when the author's labor can be commended, as is the case here, and when he cannot be held accountable beyond his own work which is correctly enough entitled, or for the re- strictive aims of a "faculty of political science of some twenty years ago. Chapters dealing with Re- ligious Liberty, Forms, Nature and Powers of Co- operation, Church Constitutions, Schisms, Church Decisions, Clergymen, Officers, Pew Rights, and Cemetaries, sufficiently indicate the scope of treat- ment. It is a typical lawbook with the usual ap- apparatus of footnotes of cases without which a practical lawbook in Anglo-American countries (which do not know such a source of law as Doc- 1919 167 THE DIAL The Remaking of a Mind By Henry de Man The author of this book is— A prominent young leader of the Belgian Labor Party. He collaborated with Liebknecht on the pamphlet on Militarism for which the latter was sentenced to four years' imprisonment. With Liebknecht he founded the powerful Socialist Young People's Federation and, with Jaures, Haase, Liebknecht and Muller, he strove until the last moment to align international labor against the war. His book is— An interpretation of the New Socialism and other issues of world reconstruction in terms of the development of his own ideas under pressure of his four years' war experiences. Published August 15. $1.75 Saint's Progress By John Galsworthy A very modern story of the challenge of these times to the world of a middle- aged English vicar. "Unfalteringly in this book Galsworthy sees beyond the moral gesture to the moral fact," says the Nation. "Hence he has written pages not easily surpassed in their strong and earnest veracity." "One stands wordless in the presence of a great novel," says the Atlantic Monthly. $1.60 Miss Fingal By Mrs. W. K. Clifford A psychic novel of the reincarnation of personality. ''One of the best novels of the last few years,'' says Wm. Lyon Phelps. "The most fascinating novel of the entire season," says the Chicago News. Sixth Printing. $1.50 Charles Scribner's Sons Fifth Ave. at 48th St. New York BOOKS FOR VARIED TASTES IRELAND'S FIGHT FOR FREEDOM By GEORGE CREEL The former Chairman of the Committee on Public Informa- tion has written the full story of Erin's Seven Century strug- gle for liberty. In his vivid pages Shane the Proud and Hugh O'Neill live again. He gives for the first time the "inside history" of Home Rule. He handles the so- called "Ulster Problem" in detail. Follows Sinn Fein's Rise to Power, and answers the question, "Can Ireland Stand Alone?" by a masterly analysis of facts and figures. Illustrated. $2.00 SYLVIA AND MICHAEL By COMPTON MACKENZIE Sylvia Scarlett, already known to Mr. Mackenzie's readers (and If you don't know her sue Is worth meeting !), turns up In Russia a vagabond cabaret singer. Through Russia, Rumania and Serbia, Sylvia make* her way, having one adventure after another and learning much about life as she faces it under the heightened stress of war. $1.75. f GOING WEST By BASIL KING The story of a love that extended beyond death and bridged the gulf with a message from the man who died fighting In France to hU wife, who stayed at home. Readers of Mr. King's •' ABRAHAM'S 1IOHOM" will find In this an even finer piece of literary work and a more conclusive proof that, as Maeterlinck said, "There are no Dead." $.80. PERCOLATOR PAPERS By ELLWOOD HENDRICK In an original style and from Hendrlck treats of things vital to life here and now thoroughly modern viewpoint, Mr. fe here and now; handling these themes In a manner to produce thought and discussion. There Is about his work the scientist's exactness, plus the whimsical turn of a man with a ripe and Imaginative mind. $1.75. THE STORY HISTORY OF FRANCE By JOHN BONNER Mr. Bonner tells the story of France from the earliest days down to the signing of the armistice—tells it with an emphasis on the human interest that makes of the usual dry chronicle of events n living narrative with the fascination of well-written fiction. Hvicral hundred UltutraUon*. $1.75. HARPER & BROTHERS Established 1817 NEW YORK Wken writing to advertisers please mention Tm Dial. i68 August 23 THE DIAL trine) would be worthless. Naturally the author, writing as he does primarily for lawyers and not laymen, observes too closely at times the current fashions. It is solemnly and punctiliously set down that •" putting ' hat drops' in the dog of a worship- per with intent to disturb the congregation by the convulsions into which the animal is thrown" will subject the offender to punishment under a "dis- turbance of meeting" statute. A mere layman would have guessed as much, but a lawyer must have more certain information and the author gives just such a case in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. The same chapter is full of similar legal bromides. The canon that the obvious is not to be mentioned is not the rule in the writing of lawbooks. Not all of the chapters, however, exhibit the fault of string- ing together a list of cases without analytical dis- crimination which is the common vice of American law textbooks. The chapter on Church Decisions, for example, is a critical, and we believe a valuable, commentary on the leading case of Watson v. Jones. The chapter on Religious Liberty, also, is well written and presents a readable, interesting, and clear statement of the reaction of our system of law to Christianity. The Mulatto in the United States. By Edward Byron Reuter. 417 pages. Badger; Boston. The book in hand purports to be "an attempt to state one sociological problem arising when two races, divergent as to culture and distinct as to physical appearance, are brought into contact under the conditions of modern life and produce a hybrid offspring whose characteristic physical appearance prevents them from passing as either the one or the other." Beginning with the earliest inter-racial intercourse in later primitive times, when no mixed blood race seems to have existed, we are taken in a survey of the Moriscoes, the Eurasians, the half, bred Eskimos, the zambos, the metis, the mestizos, and many other half-castes, as a preliminary to the study of the American mulatto. An historical study of the rise of this last type in the United States shows that like other half-castes it is the result of illicit relations between men of the "superior" and women of the "inferior" race. Aspiring in effect to an unattainable status with the white race, the mulattto is admired by the pure blacks because of his white blood, and he is practically forced into the role of leader among his darker fellows. This function of leader he is able to fill as well as he does partly because of his close contact with the whites. As a matter of fact most eminent American Negroes have actually been mulattoes. "The relative chances of a black child and a mulatto child . . . attaining to a posi- tion among the elite of the race are from thirty- four to fifty, or perhaps a hundred times as great in the case of the child of mixed blood." To sub- stantiate this generalization direct inquiries were made into the ancestry of 4,267 Negroes or mulattoes who have at some time been men or women of at least a certain degree of note. Whether this cultural prominence of the mulatto is chiefly the effect of an original superiority in his nature, or whether it is because of his better opportunities we do not know. Nor would the existing sociolog- ical situation be much affected if we did know. The mulattoes are, persistently, the property owners, the business men, the agitators, the educated men, and the spokesmen of their race. In ethnological and social study they must be examined in such a light; and it must be borne in mind that truths which will apply to the mulattoes will not apply to the pure Negroes. This summary is a poor reflection of the fine scientific scholarship displayed in this unique ethnological book—a book as charm- ing in style and as well documented in fact as Crawley's Mystic Rose. The Near East from Within Anonymous. 256 pages. Funk and Wagnalls. For this type of book, currently classified as his- tory, there is little or nothing to be said. Put out anonymously by a secret political agent, attached, as the context proves, to the German Foreign Office, it is as remarkable for its abysmal ignorance of all the veritable forces at work in human life as it is detestable for its flunkey-like attitude toward the great and powerful, and its busy, self-important re- tailing of the gossip which circulates in their ante- chambers. In the decade before the outbreak of the Great War this particular agent flitted like a bat through the dusky air enveloping the courts of Con- stantinople, Belgrade, Sofia, and the other Balkan states, covertly entering into a note-book the echoes and alarums which reached him with an eye to the day when he might advantageously dispose of them to the highest bidder. An unsystematic hodge- podge, the book is a good illustration of the manner in which an ignoble mind sees history, and shows besides how history, taken on this level, is indistin- guishable from that ugly monster which Virgil long ago portrayed for us under the name of Rumor. What is there new and remotely valuable in these two hundred pages of gossip which a student, mak- ing the serious, social-political approach to the Bal- kan problem, is likely to have missed and may find advisable to take into account in his coherent story of human evolution? Nothing, absolutely nothing! Let us convince ourselves once and for all and remain satisfied that the fluctuating opinions of sovereigns and leading politicians, at least in the impoverished form in which they reveal themselves to the av- erage official of what each nation euphemistically calls its Intelligence Bureau, are historically negli- gible. And if this be so, it logically follows that that government which, determined to build its pol- icy on the valid social, economic, and other contribu- iqio 169 THE DIAL Snell Smith Journalist and Historian is the author of "America's Tomorrow" Every patriotic American who believes all peoples ought to be free should OWN a copy of this inspir- ational treatise on national and international politics. Every library should list it, because it expresses the best judgment of this ex- tremely able man as to where America stands to- day, and what steps she will next be forced to take. Speaking of AMERICAS TOMORROW Major General Leonard Wood says: "It covers a field practically as wide as the world, and shows an immense amount of hard thinking." Hudson Maxim says: "It will do any one good to read it. I know of no work in which is so clearly discussed the relation of America to the world and the relation of the world to America." "America's Tomorrow" should go into the library of every executive, every army man, every statesman, every newspaper man, and every for- ward-thinking man and woman in the country. Just Out $2.00 NET BRITTON PUBLISHING COMPANY NEW YORK THE LITTLE REVIEW A MAGAZINE OF THE ARTS making no compromise with the public taste THE LITTLE REVIEW is pub- lishing the current work of James Joyce, William Butler Yeats, Wyndham Lewis, Ezra Pound, T. S. Eliot, Dorothy Richardson, May Sinclair, Ford . Madox Hueffer, Jean de Bosschere, William Carlos Williams, Ben Hecht, Sherwood Anderson, etc., in a cheap and convenient format. You can obtain this work in no other American magazine. THE LITTLE REVIEW is not a chatty journal giving mere publicity about the Arts; it is not here to increase contem- porary stupidity; it defends the Artist against the Vigilanti of Common Sense; it gives him a chance to show his work with that of his peers, ungarbled in editorial rooms. Margaret Anderson - - Editor John Rodker - London Editor Jules Romains - French Editor The magazine that is read by those who write the others $2.50 A YEAR 25 CENTS A COPY 24 West 16th Street, New York City When writing to advertisers please mention The Dim.. 170 August 23 THE DIAL tory forces involved in the problems of national life, first resolutely dispenses with the service of this gentry, must obtain an enormous advantage over its more shallow, nervous rivals, deflected from a delib- erate course by every wind that blows. A Short History of Rome, 44 B.C.—476 A.D. By Guglielmo Ferrero and Corrado Barbagallo. 516 pages. Putnam. The second volume of Ferrero and Barbagallo's new History is a complete disappointment of the hopes raised by their vivid story of the monarchy and the republic. The authors indulge in a good deal of awkward propaganda on behalf of limited monarchy as a form of government; they have only a sneer for the attempts of Stocism to preserve liberty of conscience during the first century; and they succeed in making the parallel growth of anarchy and absolutism, which is the great phenom- enon of the third and fourth centuries, perfectly incomprehensible. The rise of Christianity, which was of course mainly due to the despair of the state felt by the lower classes, is given the most perfunc- tory treatment. One serious question is suggested by the appearance of such a book. Our schools and colleges are flooded with "textbooks" which are but little if at all superior to this composition of Ferrero's. These textbooks narrate selected and superficial events, but of the unbroken current of human desire which underlies events they tell noth- ing. The picture of the past which is thus inserted into the mind of the ordinary student becomes a ridiculous and dangerous falsehood. What shall be done when professional historians spread the illusion of knowledge and not the reality? A History of Latin America. By William Warren Sweet. 283 pages. The Abingdon Press. To present the history of the whole of Latin America—Mexico, Central America, and South America—from the time of the Spanish conquest up to the present day, together with a brief state- ment of conditions and problems, in a single volume of convenient size, is a bold enterprise. It has been fairly well accomplished by the Professor of History at De Pauw University, in A History of Latin America. The work is done conscientiously and the book has real value for reference. The style is dry in the extreme, although the matter in itself is of almost romantic interest. There are1 many typographical errors and misspellings, particularly in personal names—a thing unfortunate where sources for correction are little accessible. The illustrations are few and of no artistic value, being clumsily grouped reproductions of portraits too different in style, age, and proportions to go well on one plate, but maps and diagrams add to the usefulness of the book. Field and Stream. By John Burroughs. 337 pages. Houghton Mifflin. This book exhibits a phenomenon in these days most rare—a first class mind at peace with the world, contemplating the seasonal processsion of Nature and the placid circling of the stars. What Burroughs says of Emerson he might have written of himself: he goes into the woods "not to bring home bird or botany lore, but to fetch the words of the wood-god to men." The section of the vol- ume devoted to field sketches opens " not so much a notebook full of notes of birds and trees as a heart warmed and refreshed by sympathetic inter- course and contact with these primal forces." In Study Notes, observations made afield come to fruit- age in philosophy, confessedly uncodified, but set out with a richness of feeling that is too often lack- ing in philosophical writing. Appropriately enough there are here discovered new paragraphs in ap- preciation of Whitman, " the one cosmic poet, more occupied with the orbs than any other and all other poets." And likewise a question phrased in epic language: "Are we ourselves anything more than the tracks of the Eternal in the dust of the earth?" La Jeunesse de Joubert. By Andre Beaunier. 349 pages. Perrin et Cie., Paris. The twofold interest of this study is that it brings to light fresh material both about the youth of Joubert and about his love affair, hitherto un- known, with the wife of Restif de la Bretonne. Thus the chaste and academic legend concerning the moralist, promoted by Sainte-Beuve, Matthew Arnold, and Mr. Babbitt, is in danger of being overthrown. M. Beaunier insists that Joubert re- mains primarily a sensitive and withdrawn "soul "; but in his youth at least the soul seems to have taken on quite a corporeal covering. Wej have details concerning the influence of his mother, the character of his early churchly education, his first worldly period and his frequentations in Paris. These included such men as Diderot, the light poet Dorat, Fontanes as intimate friend and through him the notorious Restif de la Bretonne. Scamp as he was, Restif had a wife who was little better, and one wonders what Joubert was. doing in that galley. The rather scandalous and disillusioning story of this triangle now appears as revealed in the fiction of Restif himself, in which Joubert and Fontanes figure, disguised by obvious anagrams. Restif, sensualist and realist, shows up all parties pitilessly. The construction of M. Beaunier's book is ram- bling and episodic and devotes too much space to third-rate characters only slightly connected with Joubert. But it is written with subtlety and under- standing and the main thesis of Joubert's ratheT grimy "affair" is henceforth established—hardly to his credit as a man, though it may have given him material and penetration as a moraliste. 1919 171 THE DIAL THE NEW SCHOOL FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH will open October first for the study of current economic and governmental problems. The work will be conducted by a group of well known writers and teachers among whom are Gbaham Wallas of London, Thobstein Veblen, James Habvey Robinson, Wesley Claib Mitchell, John Dewey, Dean Boscoe Pound, Thomas 8. Adams, Harold J. Laski, Moissaye Oloin, Charles A. Bears and Members of the Bureau of Municipal Research, Robert Bbuebe and Members of the Bureau of Industrial Research. Courses will include lectures on Economic Factors in Civilization, The Development of the United States into a World Power, The Historic Background of the Great War, Mod- ern Industrialism, Social Inheritance, Recent Tendencies in Political Thought, Problems of American Government, etc. There will be late afternoon and evening lectures and conferences to permit the attendance of those engaged in regular professions. No academic de- grees will be required but the standard of post- graduate work will be maintained. There will be general lectures and discussion for larger groups and small conferences for those equipped for special research. Registration will begin September twenty-second Announcement will be sent npon application to the school at 165-9 West Twenty-third Street New York City FIFTY VOLUNTEERS WANTED to enlist as candidates for the Christian Ministry in a campaign for a Reconstructed Church and Nation in the spirit which won the victory at Chateau-Thierry and St. Mihiel.# Such volunteers are needed at once in _ the liberal pulpits of America, and may be trained for efficient service at the MEADVILLE THEOLOGICAL SCHOOL Meadville, Pa. Autumn Quarter begins Sept. 24. Summer Quarter (at Chicago) begins June 16. Summer sessions at the expense of the School at the Uni- versity of Chicago. Liberal scholarship aid. Traveling fellowships providing for further study at foreign universities available at graduation. Apply to Rev. F. C. Southworth, D.D., LL.D., President Today's Short Stories Analyzed An Informal Encyclopedia of Short Story Art as Exemplified in Contemporary Magazine Fiction By R. M. Neal Pbof. Neal has taken twenty-two recent short stories and by means of foot notes analyzes the characteristics of each. Rupert Hughes says: "/ have read everything I have found about short-story writing and analy- sis, but have never seen anythitig worthy of com- parison with this volume." Net $2.50 Oxford University Press American Branch 35 WEST 32D STREET NEW YORK An Important New Dial Reprint Collective Bargaining —or Control? By Geroid Robinson •J there is no place in trade-union theory or practice for the par- ticipation of labor in the control of industry. •J but the American Federation of Labor has indorsed the Brother- hood Railroad Plan. ($ does this mean that the old-line unionism preached by Samuel Gompers is a thing of the past 7 •I a reading of this analysis of the labor situation will help you to answer this question. 24 pages. Single copies, 10 cents; lots of 100, 7 cents; lots of 500, 6 cenh; lots of 1000, 4 cents. THE DIAL PUBLISHING CO. 152 West 13th Street New York When writing to advertisers please mention The Dial. 172 August 23 THE DIAL Books of the Fortnight The Cdst of Living: A Personal Reflection and Its Out- come (132 pages; Box 282, Yale Station, New Haven, Conn.), is a polemic against human providence, which takes refuge, under the whip of fear and uncertainty, in life insurance, safe investments, and so forth, and a plea for a wholehearted acceptance of divine Providence, in accordance with the injunc- tion to take no thought for the morrow asking what we shall eat and wherewithal we shall be clothed. A book written with Tolstoyan simplicity and candor. Review later. Comparative Education, by H. W. Foght, A. H. Hope, I. L. Kandel, VV. Russell, and Peter Sandiford (500 pages; Dutton), takes stock, with the aid of sta- tistical tables, of the educational systems of the United States, Germany, England, France, Canada and Denmark. Review later, Freedom of Speech in Wartime, by Zechariah Chafee, Jr. (41 pages; Dunster House Bookshop; Cambridge, Mass.), Number 1 of Dunster House Papers, is a reprint from the Harvard Law Review of a preg- nant criticism of the working of the Espionage Act during wartime. The author concludes, after an examination of numerous cases in point, that "in our efforts to silence those who advocated peace without victory we prevented at the very start that vigorous threshing out of fundamentals which might today have saved us from a victory without peace." The Greater War, by George D. Herron (101 pages; Kennerley), endeavors to show that the war is not yet at an end and that a greater war between Ger- manism and democracy "now spreads its vaster and more fateful fields." An erratic book that leaves the reader with a lingering curiosity as to whether Mr. Herron did not actually found the National Security League rather than the Rand School. Germany's Moral Downfall, by Alexander W. Craw- ford (217 pages; Abingdon Press), is another one of those books which the presses continue to put forth because they have not the power to overcome the original impetus that the war gave these dis- quisitions. It is time to restate Newton's law: Minds at rest continue at rest, and minds in motion con- tinue in motion, unless externally acted upon by the publisher. German Social Democracy During the War, by Edwyn Bevan (280 pages; Dutton), puts together in a con- secutive narrative the principal events which make up the history of the German Social Democrat Party from the outbreak of the Great War to November 1917. Russia and Germany at Brest-Litovsk, by Judah L. Mag- nes 193 pages; Rand School of Social Science), does not claim to open secret sources for the first time, or to close finally the controversy to which this subject has given rise. Rather the author sets for himself the task of arranging in chronological order and linking together with notes of his own writing the material on the Brest-Litovsk affair which has already appeared in the press. Students of Russian history will find ample use for this un- pretentious compilation. Germany's New War Against America, by Stanley Frost (190 pages; Dutton), is symptomatic of the latest psychosis developed by the New York Tribune and Mr. A. Mitchell Palmer in reaction to a post-bellum "menace." For Union League readers only! Women and World Federation, by Florence Guertin Tut- tle (250 pages; McBride), is a plea for women to assume the initiative in creating an effective struc- ture of lasting peace. It appears that Mr. William H. Taft, in his introduction, confuses such a struc- ture with the one destined to support the present coalition of governments. What America Did, by Florence Finch Kelly (343 pages; Dutton), takes the reader forth on a kind of Cook's tour glimpsing all the multifarious activities of Amer- ica's war. A supplementary volume on What Amer- ica Didn't is needed to complete the story. Helping France, by Ruth Gaines (235 pages; Dutton), presents an account of the activities of the American Red Cross in France; the volume is illuminated with reproductions of etchings and wood-cuts of French villages and villagers. Ireland's Fight for Freedom, by George Creel (199 pages; Harper), attempts to set forth the high lights of Irish history. A book not to be compared with Irvine's Carson or Hackett's Ireland. Vestigia: Reminiscences of Peace and War, by Charles a Court Repington (373 pages; Houghton Mifflin), have the interest that adheres to a career that took the author through the Second Afghan War, the Bur- mese War, the Atbara Campaign, the Omdurman Campaign, and the South African War. Readeri must, however, wait for a second volume to learn of the author's more sedentary, but not less exciting adventures as military adviser to Tory newspaper- dom. Commemoration of the Centenary of the Birth of James Russell Lowell, (88 pages; Scribner), records for the American Academy of Arts and Letters—under whose auspices the New York Centenary was held, February 19-22, 1919—the addresses, poems, and exercises of that occasion, made memorable by the contributions of John Galsworthy, Alfred Noyes, and Stephen Leacock, besides the American speakers. Studies in the Elizabethan Drama, by Arthur Symons (261 pages; Dutton), adds'to the publishers' recent Sy- mons volumes a collection that includes ten essayt on Shakespearean plays, and essays on Massinger, Day, and Middleton and Rowley. Penetrating criti- cism here reinforces a scholarship devoid of pedantry. Review later. The Changing Drama: by Archibald Henderson (320 pages; Stewart & Kidd, Cincinnati), reprints a sur- vey which, appearing just before the outbreak of the War, received from the stage less substantiation of its predictions than might have been the case had the theater been permitted an uninterrupted develop- ment. Whether the "new" drama will now pick up where it (or roost of it) left off in 1914, remains to be seen; but certainly no other discussion of the "dramatic renaissance" unrolls before the interested playgoer so broad or rich a panorama of the field. Review later. A Treasury of War Poetry: Second Series, edited by George Herbert Clarke (361 pages; Houghton Mif- flin), includes several hundred bad poems about the war and a few that are good enough to redeem the volume. Beyond the patriotic blurbs of the numer- ous stay-at-homes rise the few clear voices of the warrior poets themselves: Gilbert Frankau, Robert Nichols, Siegfried Sassoon, Frederic Manning. These men have written poems; the rest, literature. Re- view later. 1919 l73 THE DIAL LEO TOLSTOY'S The Pathway of Life (In Two Volumes). Translated by Archibald J. Wolfe "THE PATHWAY OF LIFE" ia Tolstoy's posthu- mous message to a war-torn suffering world. It Is the Gospel of right living and right thinking and offers the great philosopher's panacea against world wars and misery, helping mankind to eradicate all those false feelings, desires and doctrines, personal, social, economic and religious, which are responsible for the present plight of humanity. Price $2.00 each volume. International Book Publishing Co., 5 Beckman Street, New York Whatever book you want has it, or will get it. We buy old, rare books, and sets of books NEW YORK and PHILADELPHIA WARNING TO DIAL READERS We are compelled to warn our readers against the activities of fraudulent agents who have lately collected subscriptions without forwarding them to us. We will deem it a favor if any reader ap- proached for money in our name will send us a description of the person. Subscriptions should be sent direct, or through an accredited agent or agency known to the subscriber. THE DIAL PUBLISHING CO. 152 West 13th Street New York City BOOK BARGAINS We have just issued a new edition of our Catalogue of Book Bargains in which several hundred books (new, and in perfect condition) are listed at unusually low prices. Write for a copy THE BAKER & TAYLOR CO. Wholesale Dealers in the Books of All Publishers 854 Fourth Ave. New York At Twenty-Sixth St. Letters to Teachers By Hartley B. Alexander Free. Elect of the American Philosophical Society Cloth, $1.25 A collection of papers of the hour addressed to all who realize the importance of a critical re- construction of public education in America. The Open Court Publishing Company 122 S. Michigan Avenue, Chicago f ivputitam Bookstore 2west45"st^K.N.Y. Book Buyers who cannot get satisfactory local service, are urged to establish relations with our bookstore. We handle every kind of book, wherever published. Questions about literary matters answered promptly. We have customers in nearly every part of the globe. Safe delivery guaranteed to any address. Our bookselling experience extends over 80 years. LECTURERS ON RUSSIA In response to widespread requests, The Dial announces the organization of a bureau to supply Bpeakers to Open Forums, churches, women's clubs, labor unions, educational Institu- tions, etc., on different phases of the Russian question. Requests received will be transmitted to those known to us as having first-hand knowledge of conditions in Soviet Russia and Siberia—former Red Cross officials, Y. M. C. A. and Y. W. C. A. secretaries, civil and military government offi- cials, journalists, etc. Available for this service are men holding different atti- tudes towards Russian revolutionary parties, but united in advocating self-determination for Russia, lifting of the block- ade, and In desiring to spread before the American public the facts as to actual conditions In present-day Russia. Address communications to RUSSIAN LECTURE BUREAU 152 W. 13th Street, New York The Dial City When writing to advertisers please mention The Dial. 174 August 23 THE DIAL Dreams, and Gibes, by Edward Sapir (72 pages; Rich- ard G. Badger; Boston), is seldom of the magic of poetry, but often of such harsh, warped magic as a poet these days can at best hope to wring from life. These lines reveal a free, idealistic spirit whom the world finds more than usual difficulty in hog-tying and hamstringing. Many of' Mr. Sapir's shorter pieces show a valuably suggestive turn of thought —not quite poetically "turned." Excrescences, too, are apt to be tacked on these tiny things, at their endings. Of the longer poems, strangely enough, two in more conventional forms, The Woman on the , Bridge and The Water Nymph, come perhaps as close as any to beauty as well as depth. Ironies, by Donald Evans (75 pages; Nicholas L. Brown; New York), is at first reading but another slightly more conventional volume in the direct line of this poet's Discords, Sonnets from the Patagonian, Two Deaths in the Bronx, and Nine Poems from a Vale- tudinarian—save for one far-surpassing new narra- tive, At the Bar. In the Ironica section itself, among the stilted self-imitative lyrics, Evan's insight into unpleasantnesses is still present, but with what, on second weighing, seems a surer aptness of philosophy and phrases; at witness here, After a Two-Hour Dinner, Without Benefit of Surgery, and Nature's Cowardice. Footsteps and Fantasies, by C. J. Druce (64 pages; Longmans, Green), has a title which aptly mirrors its content. Reality is echoed like a footstep in some of the verses, while in others the mood and imagery are fantastic. Mr. Druce writes with smooth lyric vigor. The Yale Book of Student Verse: 1910—1919, edited by John W. Andrews, Stephen Vincent Benet, John Chipraan Farrar, and Pierson Underwood (212 pages; Yale University Press), comprises the selected work of twenty-five Yale poets of the last decade. Sound and workmanlike verse with little radicalism; Tennyson would have approved of it. The poems by Stephen Vincent Benet are distinctly the best in the volume. Most of his confreres write either as adolescents or as cynical old men; he alone displays the fine enthusiasm of youth. In compiling his last college anthology, Mr. Schnittkind chose only one poem from Yale. One wonders why, considering that the work of these poets, in spite of their short- comings, far excels the standard of The Poets of the Future. The Poems and Prose of Ernest Dowson(219 pages; Boni & Liveright), should both prove the most valuable recent addition to their Modern Library. The ex- quisite lyrics of that tragically frustated spirit have never been too accessible, nor his prose works suffi- ciently known. This volume omits, unfortunately, the prose decorations, but it reprints his characteristic collection Dilemmas: Stories and Studies in Sentiment (1895) and adds the Arthur Symons Memoir. Sylvia and Michael, by Compton Mackenzie (323 pages; Harper), says the author, "is really Book three of Sylvia Scarlett." These " later adventures of Sylvia" plunge her into the war, in the Rumanian theater, and leave her sighing that everything comes to an end. "Except one thing," says Michael Fane, about to propose marriage and be accepted, "and that sets all the rest going again." So we have probably not yet done with these delightful puppets. Sylvia Scarlett was reviewed in Scofield Thayer's essay on Compton Mackenzie in The Dial for November 30, 1918; Sylvia and Michael will be reviewed shortly. The Tnnnel: Pilgrimage IV, by Dorothy M. Richardson (342 pages; Knopf), gives the reader, as in the previous books, an intensely subjective portrait of the heroine. But whereas her life had, in them, a unity however artificial, its increased complexity with Miriam's solitary independence in London serves to enhance the difficulties of the author's method. The impressions are not so sharp, are more scattered, in short, are less often vividly realized. The distinctively feminine quality of the author's insight, however, seems intensified. Miss Richard- son's work remains intrinsically interesting. Review later. Jinny the Carrier, by Israel Zangwill (607 pages; Mac- mi Han), is a tale of rural life in Essex, which the author describes as a "bland" novel, "to be read in bed with a sore throat." There is plenty of broad humor throughout, in the well individualized char- acters with their crotchety notions of conduct and religion, and Jinny is a joy, but the novel as a whole is inordinately slow and long drawn out. Review later. The Passionate Pilgrim, by Samuel Merwin (403 pages; Bobbs-Merrill), is an attempt to foist upon us as the verisimilitude of genius a most unlikely figure of a down-and-out novelist who becomes suddenly force- ful enough to bludgeon his way back to the ranks of the successful. The book is badly conceived, clut- tered, and carelessly written. Ramsey Milholland, by Booth Tarkington (218 pages; Doubleday, Page), is a series of chapters out of the life of an inarticulate wholesomely dull, exaggerat- edly average American boy, whose later school days are interrupted by war service over-seas. The key- note is simplicity both of event and method, and the performance of the volume is precisely adequate to its promise. The Young Visiters, by Daisy Ashford (105. pages; Doran), was written by a romantic nine-year-old —if Sir James M. Barrie in his whimsical preface is not making game of his readers. It is a "novel" of Victorian high life, and the quaintly pretentious style and the engaging worldly wisdom of the little author make it luscious reading. The Man with the Lamp, by Janet Laing (313 pages; Dutton), presents through the medium of a love story the various attitudes of a scientist, the presi- dent of a small town Women's Patriotic League, a musician, and a spiritual young German, towards Germany and the Germans. Though the plot inclines toward the stupidly melodramatic, the author's treat- ment of her hero, the German boy, is interestingly sympathetic. Isaacs, by Joseph Gee (317 pages; Lippincott), is an episodic and somewhat superficial study of a London Jew, in the mold of fiction. The humor seldom rises above that which may be extracted from the narra- tion of sharp practices in petty business. Renee Mauperin.by E. and J. de Goncourt (234 pages; Modern Library, Boni & Liveright), appears translated in a popular edition, with Zola's Notice included. First published in 1864, the vignette chap- ters of this acute and sympathetic study of the con- temporary French scene, with their depiction of the complacencies of revolutionists turned prosperously conservative and the rebellions of a sterling young girl remain singularly modern. And the long record of Renee's mortal illness belong to the art that is timeless. 19*9 l7S THE DIAL TWO BOOKSTORES Main Store, 30 Church St. Hudson Terminal, New York Phone 1779 Cortland! Branch Store, 55 Vesey St. Phone 498 Cortlandt McDEVITT-WILSON'S, Inc. A SCHOOL THAT STUDIES LIFE The Training School for Community Workers Reorganized on the Cooperative Plan JOHN COLLIER, Director In an eight months' course the School prepares stu- dents to meet the demand for trained workers In Communities, Industrial Welfare Organizations. Public Schools, Churches and Colleges. Also offers short courses for trained workers already in the field and for volunteers. Address for full information MISS A. A. FREEMAN R»om 1001, 70 Fifth ATeane, NEW IQRK CITT RURAL RECONSTRUCTION IN IRELAND By Lionel Smith-Gordon and Laurence C. Staples With Preface by "AS." Cloth $3.00. YALE UNIVERSITY PRESS New Haven, Connecticut 280 Madison Avenue New York City SOCIALISM BROUGHT BY THE POSTMAN! THE RAND SCHOOL CORRESPONDENCE COURSES In writing to David P. Berenberg, 7 East 15th St., New York City ask for Folder No. 50 NUMBERS—£overThe|8 Five One-Act Plays ot Distinction and Power Boards SI.35 net NICHOLAS L. BROWN, Publisher •\£*%T<&- THE MODERN LIBRARY OF THE WORLD'S BEST BOOKS Sixty-four titles now published—14 new volumes just issued. The Dial says "There Is scarcely a title that falls to awaken Interest. The series is doubly welcome at this time" —only 70c a volume wherever books are sold. Catalog on request. BONI & LIVERIGHT, 105H W. 40th Street, New York THE NEW YORK BUREAU OF REVISION Thirty-eighth Tear. Letters op Criticism, Expert Revision or MSB. Advice as to publication. Address DR. TITUS M. COAN, 424 W. 119th St., New York City FOR THE BOOK LO V E R Rare books—First editions—Books now out of print. Latest Catalogue Sent on Bequest C GERHARDT. 25 W. 42d Street. New York ANTIQUARIAN BOOK CO. Evesham Road, Stratford -on-Avon, England Dealers In Rare Books and First Editions; Dickens, Thack- eray, Stevenson, Kipling, Conrad, Maseneld, Wells, Noyes, Dunsany, etc., etc. Catalogues mailed tree on request CHOOSING A SCHOOL? Sargent's Handbook of American Private Schools describes critically and discriminatingly Private Schools of all classifications. In addition to the readable and interesting descriptions, the tables facilitate an easy comparison of relative Cost, Size, Special Features, etc. A GUIDE BOOK FOB PARENTS Our Educational Service Bureau will be glad to advise and write you Intimately about any School or class of Schools in which you are interested. Crimson Silk Cloth, Bound Corners, 768 paces, $3.00 Circulars and sample pages on request PORTER E. SARGENT, 14 Beacon St.. Boston, Mass. DEMOCRACY AND THE EASTERN QUESTION Thomas F. Millard An authoritative report on China's present economic and political condition, with special reference to Japanese encroachments. (8vo, 350 pages, t3.00.) Published by THE CENTURY CO. New York, City DEMOCRACY IN RECONSTRUCTION Edited by Joseph Schafer and Fbedeeick A. Cleveland An animated, constructive discussion of our after- war problems by more than a score of prominent men and women. $2.GO net. HOUGHTON MIFFLIN COMPANY, BOSTON A GENTLE CYNIC .ttSa52 By MORRIS JASTROW. JR., Ph.D.. LL.D., Author ot "The War and the Bagdad Railway." etc. Small 4to. 12.00 net A delightfully human book on the Omar Khayyam ot the Bible with an exact translation of the original text. How It came to be written and who wrote It (and It was not Solomon), why additions were made to the original text and the whole Interesting story u here given. J. B. Lipplncott Company, Philadelphia "A WONDERFUL BOOK '^-Chicago Dally New, BLIND ALLEY geowrgle "' Blind Alley' Is an extraordinary novel. But it's more than that. It Is a cry In the night."—Chicago Dally News. 431 pages. J1.75 net. LITTLE, BROWN & COMPANY, Publishers, Boston An unusual novel THE UNDEFEATED By J. C. SNAITH nth Printing $1.50 net This is an Appleton Book Wanted, by a Respectable Writing Person, a Fireplace in Greenwich Village or thereabouts. The room in which the fireplace is located should be small, unfurnished, and inexpensive; an attic room will do. Anyone who wants a permanent and inconspicuous male tenant for such a room may profitably open negotiations with Box No. 10, The Dial, 152 West 13th Street, New York City. When writing to advertisers please mention The Dial 176 THE DIAL August 23 NOW READY MARE NOSTRUM (Our Sea) By VICENTE BLASCO IBANEZ Translated by Charlotte Brewster Jordan. With a decorated wrapper in colors from an original painted by A. Duncan Carse. Net $1.90 The beauty and poetry of the sea flavors every page, and the adoring love which men of Latin blood have from all time for the Mediterranean, "our sea,' whose history is that of the civilization of Europe. Though not a "war novel," it incidentally supplements that unrivalled record "The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse," by showing the method used to induce neutrals living along these shores to supply contraband stores to the gray submersibles slinking like shadows past Gibraltar. There is mystery, intrigue, intense passion in the story. It is a masterpiece, by the greatest of living novelists. Other Novels by BLASCO IBANEZ are The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse Blood and Sand (Sangre y Arena) The Shadow of the Cathedral La Bodega (The Fruit of the Vine) Each $1.90, carriage extra The subtle allure in everything LEONARD MERRICK writes 18 compounded of Humor—keen, whimsical, delightful; Proportion—not a smile too much or a sigh 100 long; Insight—a knowledge of life, and of its mirror the theatre, which only maturity can fully savor; and Interest—his are books to read and read again always with satisfaction. Order now. Conrad in Quest of His Youth Cynthia Introduction by JAMBS M. BARRIE Introduction by MAURICE HEWLETT The Actor -Manager The Position of Peggy Harper Introduction by W. D. HOWELLS Introduction by ARTHUR PINERO \ Each, $1.75, postage extra. Others in press. Send for a descriptive circular OTHER RECENT FICTION THE STREET OF ADVENTURE By PHILIP GIBBS The romance and struggle of life In Fleet Street, London's great newspaper centre, the true modern "Street of Ad- venture," Is depicted from the Inside by one of the greatest of the journalists who have passed through tt. Net, $1.00 "We know no novel so rich In comprehension of all that makes and breaks and fascinates in the newspaper world."— Boston Herald. THE MAN WITH THE LAMP By JANET LAING The author of "Before the Wind" has woven an Ingenious story, sparkling with dry humor, common sense and kindly satire, but with an underlying theme of mystic spiritual beauty that is in line with the most recent developments of modern psychology. *' Net, $1.90 SILVER AND GOLD By DANE COOLIDGE The author of "The Fighting Fool" has written another real man's book—an absorbing tale of love and luck In a western mining camp. Net, $1.75 "For Western stories . . . perhaps the most real among recent novels."—Boston Post. THE HOMESTEAD By ZEPHINE HUMPHREY A novel of character and atmosphere, full of a dignified intellectual beauty, Is this story of a New England homestead and the people who lived in it. The Philadelphia Press says of It: "The book Is worthy of note; It exhibits a bal- ance and proportion . . . that produces the climax desired." Net, $1.90 THE CRESCENT MOON By CAPTAIN F. BRETT YOUNG A romance of far places, of which Alfred Sinclair Clark writing In Everybody's says, "For sheer romance . . . try 'The Crescent Moon.' It takes you straight into Africa. . . . And in it, when the slender new moon hangs above the hills, you constantly hear the drums, pulsating on all sides, calling, calling. ... In it there beats the inscrutable heart of Africa. There is the resonance of real romance." Net, $1.75 POSTAGE EXTRA. ORDER C D T\1 TTTHN &■ POIV/IP A NY 681 FIFTH AVENUE FROM ANY BOOKSTORE *-*•*• lsU 1 1 V/ll Ot \^J1V*I /\Il I NEW YORK THE WILLI4M3 miNTINO COMPANT. }IWW I0« Cost and Waste THE DIAL A FORTNIGHTLY #6$^* Ml VOL. LXVII NEW YORK NO. 798 SEPTEMBER 6, 1919 The High Cost of Waste . . ■ ,. . The Editors 179 The Economic Crux Lawrence K. Frank 180 The World's Challenge to the Church .... Mont Schuyler 184 Youth's Ending. Verse „ Maxwell Bodenheim 186 Can Real Wages be Raised? Oswald W. Knauth 187 The Literary Drug Traffic Helen R. Hull 190 Of Mediocrity and Its Excellences .... Walter L. Myers 193 The Economic Aftermath in Franceand England . . Robert Dell 195 Russia and International Economics . . . Gregory Zilboorg 198 A Ransom for Russia's Jews 201 The Old Order and the New , . 203 Casual Comment 207 COMMUNICATIONS: The League of Secret Police.—Heresy and Infallibility. 20Q NOTES ON NEW BOOKS: Saint's Progress. — The Firebrand of Bolshevism. — Volleys 209 From a Non-Combatant.—After the Whirlwind.—Revolutionary Days.—The Prelude to Bolshevism.—Trailing the Bolsheviki.—Modern Japan.—National Governments and the World War.—The Mastery of the Far East.—The British in Capri, 1806-1808.—The Pioneers of the Old South.—The League of Nations: The Principle and the Practice.— Civilization.—The Next Step in Religion.—A Year in the Navy. Books of the Fortnight 220 Tat Dial (founded in 1880 by Francis F. Browne) is published every other Saturday by The Dial Publishing Com- pany, Inc.—Marrvn Johnson, President—at 152 West Thirteenth Street, New York, N. Y. Entered at Second Class nutter at the Post Office at New York, N. Y., August 3, 1918, under the act of March 3, 1897. Copyright, 1919, by The Dial Publishing Company, Inc. Foreign Postage, 50 cents. $3.00 a Year 15 Cents a Copy r8 THE DIAL September 6 TWO NEW MACMILLAN NOVELS Now Ready May Sinclair's New Novel MARY OLIVIER: A LIFE By the Author of "The Divine Fire" "The Tree of Heaven" etc., etc. May Sinclair has here written a most unusual and original novel, both in its method and content. "Mary Olivier " is a direct presen- tation of a woman's life, her thoughts, sensations and emotions, told without artificial narrative or analysis, without autobiography. The main interest of this remarkable story lies in Mary Olivier's search for reality, her relations with her mother, father and three brothers, and her final passage from the bondage of infancy, the conflicts of childhood and adolescence, the disenchantments of maturity, to the freedom, peace and happiness of middle age. The period covered is from 1865 when Mary is two years old to 1910 when she is forty- seven. , "Mary Olivier" is a book that will stir wide comment. It is perhaps the finest of all Miss Sinclair's novels. Published Sep- tember 2. $2.00 Eden Phillpotts' New Novel STORM IN A TEACUP By the Author of "Old Delabole," "Brunei's Tower," etc., etc. "Storm in a Teacup " carries on Mr. Phillpotts' novels dealing with the human side of the different industries. Here the art of paper making furnishes the background. Mr. Phillpotts tells a delightful and highly entertaining story of a young wife who elopes with a man of high intellectual ability because she considers her husband commonplace. This decision on her part leads to a num- ber of unusual and frequently amusing situations. "Storm in a Tea- cup " is Phillpotts at his best, a delightfully human story told with skill and art. $1.60 THE MACMILLAN COMPANY, Publishers, 64-66 Fifth Avenue, New York When writing to advertisers please mention The Dial. THE DIAL A FORTNIGHTLY No The High Cost of Waste I o matter now before the American people is of a more pressing character and significance than the steeply mounting prices of those commodities upon which life directly or indirectly depends. The suggestions for meeting this problem which have come out of Washington fail to take into account the character of business and industry. The pre- tentious attack upon profiteers is an avoidance of the real issue, which is not the profits of the owner but the excessive waste, social and economic, which is inevitable when industrial equipment is primarily operative, not to satisfy social needs but to produce profits for the employer. A scientific and competent survey would show that unnecessary waste follows from: 1. The diversion of labor and resources to socially useless or socially superfluous purposes. 2. Those practices of business competition which either curtail output or, by duplication of equipment and con- ciliation of effort, increase the labor and material cost of the product. 3. The ignorance of actual social needs and the con- sequent failure to adapt production to meet them. We are certain that the final solution for the difficulties of living encountered by the aver- age citizen can be found only in a more intelligent utilization of our productive capacity. The prac- ticability of a tremendously increased production has, been demonstrated, both in this country and else- where, by the experiences of the Great War, and there remains no question as to whether it is possible mechanically, with the existing industrial equipment, to make more than ample provision for the material needs of every inhabitant of the United States. We disagree with those who believe that the necessary increase in production can be secured mere- ly by increasing the output of the individual worker, eren as we disagree with those who would bait the taker of an excessive profit. For the inevitable waste, which will follow this greater production of socially useless or socially superfluous goods, will ef- fectually cancel any increase in individual productiv- ity. Nor should it be forgotten that it is psychologi- cally impossible to induce labor to increase its pro- duction per diem or per capita when it is becom- ing obvious to everyone that forces are in opera- tion which prevent a corresponding betterment of the physical well-being of the efficient worker. Furthermore waste results also from the ab- sorption of values' through superfluous processes and handlings, which lessen the actual amount of life- sustaining goods that income will command, and therefore diminish the effective demand for the essen- tial industrial products. For if the average worker is- unable to buy with his present high money wage as much as he was able to buy with the lower money wage which he received a few years ago, the cause can only be that, at certain steps in the process which brings food from the farms, clothing and shoes from the fields and factories, and housing from the forests and quarries, a portion of the values, far beyond what might be considered necessary or reasonable, has been absorbed in payment for useless exertion. This leads to a diminution of the real purchasing power of income, which in turn leads to deliberate restrictions upon production. And this process of absorbing values unnecessarily is increasing continually. As the industrial system develops it becomes more complex, more roundabout, affording a growing number of opportunities for non-productive middlemen to insert themselves be- tween the producer and the consumer. In many cases they who insert themselves do not add to the life sustaining values of the goods which pass through their hands, though they add to the price at which the goods are sold, bringing about a total which is excessive. At the same time, of course, the improvements in equipment and processes tend to offset, by cheaper production, these inserted charges. In normal times processes and methods improve perhaps faster than the middlemen can take up the slack. In all likeli- hood the worker has benefited by the industrial im- provements of the past hundred years, but in years such as those through which we have just passed, the reverse is far nearer the truth. And since it is legally impossible at the present time to disallow the cost of these wasteful and useless practices, the country's workers are in the way of starving because our methods of sustaining life have become too high- ly refined. Another factor which artificially maintains pro- i8o September 6 THE DIAL duction costs above the figure which would be, justi- fied by the advanced state of industrial development is the practice of selling labor saving machinery at a price which bears no relation to the labor and equipment cost of manufacture, but at a price which is just below the saving in wages which the pur- chaser will realize through its use. And, finally, though this does not by any means complete the full list, the general restriction of pro- duction, such as we are now witnessing and which is brought about by a general fear of over-production, adds greatly to the cost at which goods can profitably be sold. When production is restricted below the possible maximum, there is added to the production- cost of the actual product the overhead of the idle equipment as well as the cost of the increased effort to sell on a listless market. Furthermore, wages are reduced or are kept down to the minimum during this period, with the result that the purchasing power of the community is restricted. All this in spite of the fact that, as the industrial arts develop, the cost of production, measured in labor-energy and equipment-time units, constantly decreases. Unchecked by our misunderstanding of its nature, the industrial machinery already in exist- ence would produce more than a sufficiency for every one. Our present need is not to build new factories, but to operate intelligently those already in exist- ence; not to induce the army of industry to work ■ more hours per week, but to release it from the re- strictions which divert its natural expenditures of energy to socially useless purposes; not to penalize the profiteer, but to insist that waste shall not be a source of profit to anyone. It is not hard to see that our industrial system is not functioning for the purpose for which it is in- tended, and that it is not producing at its full capac- ity. In this is to be found the explanation of the appalling predicament in which this country, in com- mon with other civilized countries, now finds itself. A complete and impartial investigation of the actual costs of production in the principal American industries must be made to determine the extent and character of the wastes which have crept into the process by which man must get from the earth those things upon which life depends. As the Federal Government will undertake neither a complete nor an impartial investigation, we are urging that a survey be made by experts who are scientifically qualified and are independent of political and finan- cial interests. _ _ The Editors. The Economic Crux A, .lmost all of the programs for reconstruc- tion and industrial relations recently issued by non-labor organizations and individuals contain, in some form, vigorous -denunciation of restriction of output by the workers. That section of the pro- gram recently adopted by referendum vote of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States which * deals with this topic may be taken as illustrative of the non-labor approach to the subject. It states the matter thus: Efficient production in conjunction with adequate wages is essential to successful industry. Arbitrary restriction on output below reasonable standards is harmful to wage earners, employers, and the public and should not be permitted. Industry, efficiency, and initiative, wherever found, should be encouraged and adequately rewarded, while indolence and indifference should be condemned. Such condemnations as this have been evoked by the labor union regulations limiting the amount of work or of production per worker and by the un- official practises among the workers themselves of deliberate curtailment of effort. The closing sen- tence of the above quotation implies that such restrictions are the concomitants of "indolence and indifference." But such a simple and ready ex- planation is open to serious questioning and is prob- ably due to a failure to comprehend the real motives behind the labor movement. The major premise upon which restriction of output is condemned is the proposition that only increased production can insure any permanent and general improvement in society. There are, of course, many who believe that a more equitable scheme of distribution would contribute more to the well-being and development of society; but a consideration of quantities available for distribu- tion, whether of capital wealth qr of goods, must lead any reasonable person to concede that increased production is a prerequisite to such improvement, whatever else may follow. Enough of the neces- sary commodities there can never be because of the growth of consumption, both qualitatively and quantitatively: an increase, considered absolutely and relatively to the population, in the production of most commodities and services appears therefore to be an indisputable need of a developing and im- proving civilization. s Why then should labor organizations practice restriction of output? Or, setting aside restriction of output during working hours, why should labor organizations seek a progressive reduction of hours 1919 181 THE DIAL of work, having obtained a sixty hour week, seeking one of fifty-four, then of forty-eight, until now, in many trades where a forty-four hour week is in force, one of thirty-six hours is under discussion as the next demand? To many persons, and par- ticularly to employers, such a policy appears social suicide; while they may assent to a decrease from the demonstrably excessive hours of yesterday, they can find in these continued demands for a shorter working week solely a manifestation of "indolence and indifference." Yet, behind these demands for a progressive reduction in hours of work, the literature on the labor movement discloses a methodical and reasoned program. In most industries the workers suffer from the lack of continuous employment; in the needle trades, for example, periods of intense activity for a few months alternate with periods of unemployment and consequent lack of wages. The same situation is found in almost all competitive enterprises. From coal and metal mining to food preparation, in practically every form of produc- tion, there is an alternation of expansion and con- traction of production, a taking on and a turning off of employees accordingly. To modify this sit- uation, and by prolonging the period of production to gain a greater continuity of employment, is the frankly announced purpose of labor's demands for a shorter and shorter working week. The reason- ing behind this procedure may be briefly stated: if the employer, operating on a fifty-four hour schedule, can in six months produce enough to gain a profit, then the adoption of a forty-four hour week will prolong to eight months the period of produc- tion necessary to gain an equivalent profit. The corollary of this reads; if the employer can produce enough in six months to gain a profit from one hundred employees, then a moderate restriction of output will force him to employ, say one hundred and twenty-five, permitting twenty-five additional workers to gain an income for six months. It is believed that the foregoing is a fair statement of the aims of labor as expressed in this advocacy of shorter hours and restriction of output, apart from the considerations of health and well-being in- volved in their opposition to long hours. Thus it appears that we can find a reasonable explanation of labor's action, as a reaction against the industrial processes from which it suffers; and in that explana- tion we find labor seeking what indolence would surely reject—continuous work instead of desultory, unstable employment. The program of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States is not unconcerned with this ques- tion of continuous employment: Regularity and continuity of employment should be sought to the fullest extent possible and constitute a responsibil- ity resting alike upon employers, wage earners, and the public. The wage earners maintain that, in their restric- tions of output and their demand for shorter hours, their main object is continuous employment for all workers, and that, lacking other resource, they are forced to these means of obtaining that end. The burden of responsibility, accordingly, is shifted to the employers who, as quoted above, acknowledge the desirability of continuous employment. In placing partially on the workers the responsibility for achieving that end, they should, in fairness, acknowledge labor's manifest intent. What then of the employers' position and the means they adopt to discharge their share of the responsibility? They will urge that, in accordance with the fluctuations and the seasonal character of demand, they are forced to curtail production; thus they thrust the ultimate responsibility upon the fickle public. The student of industrial conditions will not ignore the seasonal influence upon the demand for commodities nor its effect upon the pro- duction of the supply. But an analysis that rests with the statement that production is non-con- tinuous and consequently desultory is surely no analysis at all. The period beginning with the signing of the armistice gives an excellent field for the study of curtailment of production. When the armistice was signed the industries of the country were, with the exception of those considered non-essen- tial, at the peak of productivity. During the war, consumers of practically all commodities were unable to obtain adequate supplies because of war requirements and the forced closing down of non- essential industries. Accumulated stocks of com- modities were almost entirely consumed during this period. With the exception of the army and navy almost all consumers were, at the signing of the armistice, in need of goods for consumption or for investment use. But, instead of finding produc- tion in all lines rapidly increasing after the first month or so of relaxation from the war strain, we find that the whole range of industries outside of those devoted to the production of the so-called luxuries cut down on production and laid off em- ployees in large numbers. The demand was ready to express itself in orders which would tax the in- dustrial capacity of the country, but the manufac- turers and producers found the demand not forth- coming at the prices they asked. These prices, ac- cording to the producers' statements, were necessary for the realization of profits at the rate they con- l82 September 6 THE t>IAL sidered essential to the proper conduct of their enter- prises, and, in order to preserve that rate of profit, they abstained from production, with a resultant loss of employment to the workers. The reluctance of the middlemen to place orders was merely a phase of the price situation and was due to their fear of being caught in the falling market. One remarkable accompaniment of this post- armistice situation, revealing the producer's posi- tion, was the demand by producers for the "taking off of the harness of governmental regulation in order that the operation of the law of supply and de- mand might be restored." At the same time the pro- ducers of commodities of which the government had a surplus demanded that this surplus be with- held from the market, although the repeal of gov- ernment control and the operation of the law of supply and demand should logically have led to the marketing of the surplus and the adjustment of prices accordingly. In refusing to produce unless an impoverished society was ready to pay the price demanded, and in persuading the government to refrain from marketing its surplus stocks of goods at prices the consumers were willing to pay, the producers of the country were acting in accordance with ac- cepted business policy. It is not the purpose of this discussion to criticise the activities of any group in society. So long as enterprise is freely encour- aged and is rewarded by such profits as it may ob- tain, present conditions are an inevitable result of socially sanctioned efforts. The task of suggesting modifications does not belong here, where the primary object is to interpret and explain. But, making due allowance for such unavoidable situations as may be found, the conclusion is in- escapable that, since the production of goods is stimulated by the profit incentive and since profits can be, and are, procured by curtailing the supply and thereby enhancing the price of that which is produced, the responsibility for voluntary curtail- ment of production and for the consequent lack of continuous employment rests upon the shoulders of the employers. Even in the clothing trades the seasonal demand is fostered by the producers and distributors through changes in styles which make for increased purchases at profitable prices. The implications of this complex need exposition, for here we find an apparently inescapable economic crux: increased production per person and per unit of plant is essential to the progressive well-being of civilization, while the continuance of an economic system in which unrestricted enterprise is per- mitted and encouraged to seek profits involves the curtailment of production whenever profits ■ threatened. At present the workers, who suffer from this process, are complaining and seek- ing a change. This question is then presented: which is to suffer change or sacrifice—the existing order of profit-making, or the progress of civiliza- tion and its apparent concomitant, improvement in the condition of labor. The crux seems unavoid- able, for the maintenance of a capitalistic industrial system in which unrestricted enterprise is en- couraged to seek its own reward in profits makes for curtailment of production whenever profit- making is thereby benefitted. This then is the major economic problem of to- day: the solution of the conflict between the profit incentive and the necessity for greater production. On the one side we see the capitalist producer seek- ing profits as high as obtainable under competitive conditions and practising curtailment of production, "capitalistic satotage," as Professor Veblen terms it, to enhance the price of goods sufficiently to insure such profits: on the other side we see labor advocat- ing shorter hours and practising restriction of out- put in an effort to force the prolongation of the period of production and thereby to obtain con- tinuous employment. Labor is also seeking, per- haps unconsciously, to increase production by increasing the sum total of yearly wages through continuous employment, and consequently the pur- chasing power which makes for production; for one of the large factors in the variation of demand is a loss of purchasing power that forces the wage earners to lessen their purchases of food, clothing, and so on, when their employment ceases. The program of the revolutionary labor move- ment aims at taking over the industry of the country in order that the worker may enjoy continuous em- ployment at "wages" which are not jeopardized by the profit making technique, while production will be increased accordingly. The issue between capital and labor is joined and, while the interests of both may be the same, as is constantly reiterated, yet it appears that the further- ance of those interests will require a readjustment and modification of the present system of industrial control. To one seeking to discover the probable trend of things it appears not unlikely that this readjustment and modification may progress somewhat along the following lines. The recent years have witnessed a progressive extension of the class of public utilities to include more and more varied types of enterprises which the public, through the government, seeks to control. The public utility is an organization ob- ligated to render service (or to furnish commodities such as water, gas, electric power) upon demand, at rates fixed by the state and not fluctuating accord- ing to market conditions, and therefore it may not 1919 183 THE DIAL practice the profit making technique. Government control is exercised over the "price" of the service or commodity and over the scope and character of the operations. It cannot be doubted that control of business en- terprises, either directly or through fixing of prices, will form one of the major factors in politics and government from now on. In economic discussions public control assumes a larger part each year, and the " price system," with values fixed or determined by market forces, cannot long escape a critical analysis which may prove destructive of much that passes for economic theory. The "free play of economic forces" and "the law of supply and de- mand " upon close inspection appear to be the result- ants of many individual efforts to control com- modities and their prices, in order to obtain profits; there are apparently few "economic" forces sus- ceptible of differentiation from natural forces, apart from these human efforts at control; the efforts of many individuals seeking control give the appearance of a force; and the concept of "enterprise," which seems to arise and function spontaneously, gives the appearance of freedom, all of which obscures the essential fact that the effort of enterprise means attempted control, partial or complete. If economic "forces" are the aggregate of like efforts at control, and are in effect control, then necessarily the issue becomes one, not of economic freedom versus economic control, but of choosing which control society finds desirable or advan- tageous—individual or social. Society has found it desirable and advantageous to restrict enterprise seeking to operate in the public utility field; in many states a certificate of necessity and convenience is required before a public utility may be started. Should the investigation of the possibilities of price fixing disclose that unrestricted enterprise makes for higher prices and social costs out of proportion to the gains involved, it is reason- able to assume that enterprise in productive lines will be controlled likewise. The fixing of prices generally will necessitate the restriction of enterprise to protect the existing producers working under those prices, as in the case of public utilities; and, as during the war, priority ratings will be required to discriminate between would-be purchasers who can no longer express their needs by bidding higher than others. The experience of the government price-fixers during the war suggests ideas about the possible treatment of the inefficient or "marginal" producers, those fosterlings of unrestricted enter- prise, which are enlightening for the future. Undoubtedly the price system and free enterprise are to be subjected to much drubbing at the hands of politics and economics, while the efforts of labor to obtain self government in industry must bring about a modification of industrial organizations and processes. Whether the capitalistic system can sur- vive the demise of the price system and free enter- prise is an interesting speculation, but not relevant here. As enterprise is restricted and prices merge into rates, the form of industrial organization and its operation will tend toward the public utility order of regulated, fixed-return, non-competitive in- stitutions, with the employees largely in control. Curiously enough a modification of the profit making technique may be effected through the ac- counting procedure. Some of the engineers who have been studying the problems of production and costs have made perhaps the most suggestive and far reaching contribution to this economic complex, in stating that, if the entrepreneur chooses to keep his plant idle because the market price for his product is not profitable, then the cost of that ab- stention from production (the accruing interest, depreciation, maintenance, and the like during the period of idleness) is net a part of the cost of pro- duction for the consumer to pay in the purchase price of the commodity, but rather is it a cost to be deducted from the profits of the enterprise for the sake of which it is incurred. In other words, the overhead expenses of the idle plant are to be taken out of the profits and not passed on to the consumer, as though they were part of the production costs; thereby the abstention from production is to be penalized. When the full implication of this doc- trine put forth by reputable engineers is understood by economists and business men, the results will be worth observing. The line-up of the engineers with labor in seeking fuller utilization of the productive capacities of society emphasizes the conflict of ideals and aims which the reconstruction programs of the employers and the demands of labor involve. The intransigent attitude of many employers will prob- ably intensify the conflict but can scarcely prevent their ultimate defeat. The reported activity of the bankers promises a new development, in that they are said to be refusing financial aid to any producer who is uncompromising toward labor; apparently they prefer to concede a ^portion of capital's profits and control, rather than, by forcing labor to greater unity and stronger opposition, to further the revolu- tionary labor movement. In view of the growth of labor consciousness and unity, the historical record of such conflicts in the past, and the position of labor on the side of social progress, the outcome is almost mathematically predictable. Lawrence K. Fr/ 184 September 6 THE DIAJ. The World's Challenge to the Church JTerhaps the casual observer of things sat up, in a mild surprise when the first of the church programs for industrial regeneration was published. Then, as one denomination after another followed this plunge Jnto unfathomed depths, his surprise must have deepened—or perhaps it changed into humor or cynicism. But there were a few who, though long despairing of ever finding any vitality in organized religion, still hoped for a dying hope, and took courage from this promise of returning life. How deep ran the currents of belief and inten- tion in these various programs could not be told. In none of them was a promise of definite action made, and there were strange ambiguities in all. It remains to be seen whether the several church organizations which, during the past months, have raised hundreds of millions to evangelize the world, to carry the " Message " to every people, and which have announced that a reweaving of the industrial fabric must be considered an integral part of any evangelical program—it remains to be seen whether these* organizations will look the situation straight in the face. Have they really the necessary insight and courage, combined with adequate leadership? And will they use their funds and their frequently remarkable equipment to attack the problem scientifically? Such an attitude will mean a definite break with hallowed traditions. Still, the Church must have realized by this time that the argument from Char- ity and Brotherhood, advanced for nearly nineteen hundred years, has proven ineffectual. The old methods of exhortation and pleading cannot be revamped, or merely given a new force. Simply to strengthen the voice under the pressure of a raw necessity, or to pitch it in a higher key, will stim- ulate no fresh reaction. But fortunately for the various churches and those Christian organizations that desire to lend their strength toward the rehabilitation of society, there is another way of effecting a change in the basis of social action and responsibility: they can seek out the underlying facts of a system through which society creates wealth for the few and pov- erty for the many. If the Church were to secure these facts and place them, with all their implica- tions, before a puzzled world, the materials for a new social structure would be at hand, .and would be put together perhaps with the voluntary coop- eration of those who now are the worst malingerers. It is peculiarly significant—and fortunate, too— that now, for the first time in history, the facts upon which a new understanding of society might be based are at hand. The events of the past few years have forced into the public records a nearly complete account of how and by jvhat means the rich are made richer and the poor made poorer, and of why and how the tremendous productivity of modern machinery has not greatly improved the lot of the common man. And it is fortunate for the church organizations, also, that the same stretch of time has discovered men who are capable of handling these facts and illustrating their significance. The economists and engineers who compose this group have pushed their researches further than mere tabulation, and have been forced to the conclusion that it is the waste- fulness of the commercial system, the ruthlessness inseparable from business competition, that makes real charity and brotherhood tantamount to busi- ness and commercial suicide. Science has played right into the hands of the Church, but—will the Church seek out these scien- tists and secure their help? Will the Church listen to their accounts beyond the point where it is appar- ent that the facts of industrial malversation will cut like a knife through the straw house of our society, so solid in appearance? Time only can answer this question, and the decision is, after all, in the hands, not of the Church as an institution, but of individuals who are not more than human. But these individuals who are not more than human are the very ones who announced the various industrial programs—not, it is probable, for lack of something better to do, but because the working time before chaos seemed to be measurable in months rather than in years. Let these churchmen look about them and observe the character of the system that has bred the unrest which is so greatly feared. They will see some tens of thousands of industrial enterprises within the bounds of the United States, and per- haps as many hundreds of thousands of business enterprises in the same area. They will see that every one of these, with negligible exceptions, is working at cross purposes with every other one. And besides, every one of them is working in the dark. It is part of the necessity of competition that aims and plans be kept secret, and that cost be counted only as a subtraction from the final (per- sonal) gain. If a certain bit of strategy be deter- mined upon in camera because it promises profits to its inventor, its cost even to the inventor must not 1919 i*5 THE DIAL be taken too seriously. Just as in the Great War the decision of the German General Staff to employ poison gas took very little if any account of the equipment and labor-cost of preparation, or the effect upon the morals of the home population. Even the unescapable fact that England and France could play at the same game was discounted in view of the advantages of being the first in the field. Then came tanks and tank-guns, and raids and counter-raids by sea and air. Just as in today's markets there are advertisements and counter adver- tisements, sales campaigns and expensively attractive packages, rebates and cross freights, credit restric- tions and "bull" raids, publicity by packers and the long run of devices intended to benefit or pro- tect the interests of particular business men—all of which cost the consumer somewhat more than their full price while bringing him spmething less than nothing. Business is very much like war, and with not all the blood left out, at that. In the recent war-to-end-war there were some on both sides, in all probability, who made money, who gained honor and glory. Perhaps there were some who were morally strengthened, for conflict of any sort brings out sleeping qualities of the human character, it quickens into life attributes which are admirable, it works to deprive the individual of that insularity which breeds selfishness. Similarly, the struggle of the market may produce some ben- efits which might not appear were a purely coopera- tive society to take the place of the recognized order. But before voting to retain perpetual war and an absolutely competitive market, we might set about determining whether there has accrued through them any net gain, in goods or godliness, which might be set down as having benefited the common run of men. Perhaps after all, then, the dilemma that dis- turbs the church organizations is: by what means are we to retain the salutary struggle of industry, but still do away with the devastation of the pres- ent method of production and distribution? How are we to retain competition, but place it on a higher plane? Fortunately there is a middle course, a course peculiarly in keeping with the teachings and tradi- tions of the Christian Church. The devotion and sacrifices of its own missionaries have ample demon- strated that the desire to give, not to get—the Christian motive, in short—calls forth easily the finest type of mind and spirit to fight and compete, always for the opportunity to serve. If the Church will take this lead, if it will act on its own teachings, it will be on bed-rock. Not even the most reactionary of its members would dare openly to assail it for preaching that to serve one's fellow men is the highest good; and that the kingdom of heaven on earth will not come until all effort, including that required in business and indus- try, is turned to the service of society. The Church may momentarily lose several million dollars through the quiet defection of the reactionaries, but the millions of new believers in a revitalized church will be over-compensation. And if the Church does decide to stand by its own teachings, what then? How is it to make clear to every one the idiocy of a system which dis- torts life and makes a scrap of paper of the Gospels? Can it be done by preachments? Can it be done simply by making more evident thai which is already evident, and has been evident for ages? It does not seem possible. Preaching so far has been imperceptibly effective. And the libraries are full of statistics showing that so many millions of men support families on $700 a year, when decency cannot be reached with less than three times that sum. There are tabulations without number which tell of the injury and death of men who work in the mines and about machinery, and whose lives are a mixture of want and bitterness. There are books without end devoted to the human necessity of the dignity of labor, yet most of our manufac- turers fight even "company unions" for fear that labor might acquire a standing which would make its voice heard in the community. There are many organizations, furthermore, devoted to making a hard life easier, but not one whose purpose it is to make a hard life impossible. Is the Church to carry on in industry as if we had never drained swamps to prevent malaria, or built sewers, or puri- fied our water supplies? The Church must know, or it can find out, that modern society has sources of knowledge and equip- ment which would make it ridiculously easy to supply every one with far more than the bare neces- sities of a decent life. There is no difficulty in demonstrating that a unit of human effort and skill can produce today at least a hundred times as much as was possible a hundred years ago. Still one would not be far from the truth in maintaining that the average man is not even ten times better off, nor is he appreciably happier, than he was a cen- tury ago. If the men at the head of the various church movements do not know this, they might find it out. There are men in their own churches who do know. Now since all this is fact, tested fact, it would seem to furnish a sufficient cause for action. A realization of at least part of it lies deep in the minds of many others besides those churchmen who i86 September 6 THE DIAL so sincerely desire a radical change in the basis of social action and responsibility. But its truth alone will not make it adequate as ammunition in the actual fight which the Church may have to wage. The admittedly enormous productivity of the machine industries is no more vital or active a fact than the equal truth that men are underpaid, are needlessly injured at their machines, and are denied the dignity of their position as producers. What the Church should have as ammunition is the facts of why and how such a state of apparently reckless disorganization exists. It must go deeper than effects. It must seek out causes. The symp- toms have been known for ages. What the Church organizations need is an industrial pathologist, or a doctor of social medicine. This is no job for amateurs, nor for mere humanitarians. A desire to revitalize the Church and a deep sympathy for the downtrodden perhaps has furnished the stimulus to action, and from the ranks of the desirous and sympathetic may be drawn some whose powers as orators and advocates will be in good place when the facts have been collected and put in form. But to entrust the work of research to men and women in whom sensitiveness to conditions is more pro- nounced than scientific attitude and training, is like entrusting a surgical operation to the hands of the merely sympathetic amateur. After all, at this particular moment it is ignor- ance rather than selfishness with which the Church will have to contend. Those who benefit from the present order, like those who most deeply mourn the untoward results of things as they work out, are not aware of the reason why there is not enough for all. Those who mourn think in terms of a greater softness on the part of those who bene- fit and those who benefit fear lest a greater softness will mean disaster for society as well as suffering for their own. Certainly the force with which the Church must contend is, in the greater part, ignorance rather than selfishness. If it were selfishness, if men were basically selfish, at bottom untouched by the suffer- ing of others, there would be less, decidedly less, chance for success. But if, as seems most likely, the reason for the state in which civilization finds itself springs from the common ignorance as to why the machine industries are so ineffectual a weapon against a nearly implacable nature, all that is needed is a better common understanding. The imagination of the community would be stirred by a plain demonstration of the potential productivity of the machine industries, coupled with an explanation of why human effort and skill show such meager results in comfort and happiness for the masses. As a nation we will disallow this stupid- fight between business men, for we will see that it is carried on at our expense, and that even the victors in this guerilla warfare do not really benefit in the end. The essential brutality of it all will force us, in revolt, to seek another basis of life. Its sheer senselessness would affect even the most hard- ened believer in the state of things as they are. The world, through a billion mouths, has issued its challenge to the forces of civilization. The Chris- tian Church has heard, and has accepted the chal- lenge. A noble gesture, that of the churches and their organizations. It meant a nearly complete break with the past. But will the churches see clearly the nature of the fight? Will its leaders interpret the teaching* of Christ in terms of this day—setting aside special pleading in favor of scientific exposition? Will it search out the facts and study them, or will it call numberless conferences on the state of society and then decide, on the basis of the weightiest advocacy, to lend its support to this or that opinion and belief? Will it prove its Doctrine orthodox By apostolic blows and knocks? The churches alone can do this work. On the success with which it is carried out will depend the fate of our western civilization, the fate of Chris- tendom—indeed, the permanence or extinction of the Christian Church as an institution. For if we are to believe the evidence of history, revolutions of the conventionally bitter sort are scant respecters of those institutions which held strength under previous dispensations. Mont Schuyler. Youth's Ending Only when youth flings his last kiss at us— A mist-bud that dies upon our lips— Only then do we plant the remembrance of his kiss In our hearts, and sit before it a moment. We play on a mist-mandolin that fades away: We play to persuade the frail dwarf of our hearts That he covers the sky, in a stride. Maxwell Bodenheim. 1919 187 THE DIAL Can Real Wages Be Raised? It was one of the postulates of classic economists that the masses of the people were doomed forever to an income so small that they must always be on the verge of starvation; and that if any increase in their real income should perchance come to their lot, it would immediately be taken up by an increase in the population. In this way, they arrived at the iron law of wages, which stated that wages must always be just enough for a bare existence. Mod- ern thought, especially among industrial workers, proceeds on an entirely different assumption. It views income as indefinitely expansible, and already capable of supporting the great bulk of the popu- lation in a degree of comfort undreamed of by former generations. Apart from labor's demand for a voice in the management of industry, it demands an increased share in the fruits of production with a view to obtaining for everyone at least an approxi- mation of the comfort hitherto attained only by the few. As one labor leader put it, when he was asked by his employer what he was really after: "What w-e want is to live more the way you do." Putting aside entirely any question of innate jus- tice involved in this new attitude, how far is it capable of realization? Is the actual income of the country sufficiently large to meet the demand for real comfort on the part of practically all of its citizens? Or must the great bulk of our citizens continue to struggle along on the verge of starvation, owing to an actual deficiency of the goods necessary to supply any higher level of existence? We have heard much of the increased produc- tivity of industry, but until the war forced us to make inventories of our strength and resources, we have never viewed our problems in their national' aspect. It has been one of the corollaries of our in- dividualistic philosophy that our central thought has turned on keeping open the door for private initia- tive and personal attainment without delving too deeply into the trend of national affairs. Our as- sumption that each individual, if given a free chance, would attain an economic status compatible with his ability, had a broad foundation in fact and experience during the days of free land on the frontiers. But the change in our economic and so- cial point of view whifh has slowly been growing into our lives during the past twenty-five years has been tremendously accentuated by the solidarity brought about through the war. The basis of esti- mates has become national; inventories of our man- hood, our power to bear taxation, and our produc- tive capacity, became necessary. From a vague con- ception of our country as boundless in expanse and wealth, we have become acutely conscious of our limits. In many fields, we have fairly accurate knowledge of these limits, and have tested our power to increase them; in other fields we are still groping. What are our limits in supplying comfort to our citizens? It is a misfortune that wealth and income are susceptible to measurement only in terms of money; for in this way, a false identity between them is apt to becloud our understanding of the problems involved. Moreover, money itself is not a final measure, for with changes in prices, the yardstick itself shrinks or grows. In recent years, we have become accustomed to a progressive shrinkage. This defect may in large measure be offset by use of the index number of prices of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and checked up by similar compu- tations. The national income, in addition, varies on the whole as individual incomes vary; it is large in periods of great industrial activity, and small when, production is curtailed. The study of any one year in consequence, especially if that be a year of war, must be applied with great caution as a guide for the future. It is often said that a rise in wages is inevitably taken up by a corresponding increase in prices, and that all agitations for higher wages are hence use- less. There is just enough truth in this assertion to make it appear plausible, and yet the theory that one offsets the other is not susceptible of deep prob- ing. Changes in wages and prices are particular changes, and while they affect and condition such generalities as rates of wages and price levels, they do not maintain a constant relationship. What a rise in wages really implies, is an increase of eco- nomic goods to the wage earners; and if these goods exist in sufficiently large quantities to meet an increased demand, a rise in prices will not result. Given the existence of goods, it is possible that real wages may increase. The basis of all income studies is the estimate rnade by Professor King of $30,500,000,000 in 1910. This figure has undergone keen scrutiny by many critics, and may on the whole be accepted as accurate. By applying a correction based on the price level and the physical production, to this amount, Dr. Anderson arrived at the amounts for the national income in succeeding years: 1910 . . .$30,500,000,000 1915 . .. 3 5,400,000,000 1911 . .. 29,600,000,000 1916 . .. 49,200,000,000 1912 . .. 33,800,000,000 1917 . . . 68,600,000,000 1913 . . . 34,500,000,000 1918 .. . 73,400,000,000 1914 . .. 32,600,000,000 i88 September 6 THE DIAL The last figure is less convincing than the others, since the basis, railway gross earnings, ceased to be a correct standard, and thus rendered comparisons difficult. That the facts are in the main cor- rect, is confirmed by the estimate made by the Bankers Trust Company for 1916 of $50,000,000,- 000 and that made by Dr. David Friday for 1917 of $65,500,000,000. If we accept the gross earn- ings of railroads as a just measurement for the physical production, and reduce the income of each year to the 1918 price level and the 1918 popula- tion, the average income for a period of eight years is $72,250,000,000. This figure is therefore a normal one with the exception of the price level element, and may be used so long as all other figures are based on the same level of prices. Average Railroad Estimated income gross earnings Estimate income at 1910 using 1910 ot at 1910 price Year. as basis. population, price level. level. 1910 100 92.3 30.5 $330.4 1911 99 93.9 30.2 321.6 1912 106.9 95.5 32.6 341.4 1913 112.5 97.1 34.2 352.2 1914 104.5 98.7 31.9 323.3 1915 110 100.4 33.6 334.6 1916 129 102.0 39.3 385.3 1917 137.2 103.6 41.8 403.4 Average at 1910 price level 349.0 The average income per person, $349, is equiva- lent to $685, at the 1918 price level, or $72,250,- 000,000 for the total population of 105,500,000. It compares so closely with Dr. Anderson's figure for that year, and Dr. Friday's esti- mate of above 70 billions, that it may be accepted as the basis for further examination. How is this sum divided? And by how much does it exceed the minimum of existence and the minimum of comfort? It is the surplus above these amounts which is the bone of contention in any discussion of the distribution of wealth, and which labor has in mind when it, demands an increase in wages, and a more equitable distribution of wealth. It may be arrived at in either of two ways: first, by estimating the minimum of existence, and sub- tracting it from the total income of 72 billion dol- lars; and second, by adding together the known sur- pluses, and comparing the results. The number of heads of families may be esti- mated at 23,066,000. The investigations of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics and Dr. Ogburn of the War Labor Board indicated that in the summer of 1918 the minimum cost of existence for a family of five was about $1380 per year; re- ducing this to the basis of 4^2, $1250 probably represents the minimum; and $29,000,000,000 may therefore be taken as the smallest amount on which the present population of the United States can survive. At the same time, $1760 was found as the minimum of comfort for life in a large eastern city. Taking this figure for what it is worth, the na- tional minimum on this basis would be about $40,-' 500,000,000. If these sums be substracted from the estimated national income of 70 billions, then there is a surplus of income roughly equal to that necessary for existence. And even if the stand- ard of minimum comfort were attained by every one, there would still be a large surplus left, amounting to some 30 billions. The most recent complete figures we have for incomes are those for 1916. In that year, the in- comes which were reported above $3000 amounted to $6,298,000,000; and corporate incomes amounted to $8,766 millions. Subtracting the duplications of $2136 millions leaves a total income of $12,828 million, to which should, be added a round $5 billion to represent the $2000-$3000 class, of whom there were 2,400,000 in 1917 ,and which were not reported in 1916. We had then in 1916 a surplus income of about 18 billions about which enough is known to make an estimate. Un- doubtedly, it should be somewhat larger than this, since all incomes are not reported, but the amount is pure guesswork. Expenses for government for 1916 were as follows: Federal $1,048 million State 505 City 1,043 County (estimated) 480 Total $3,076 million On account of the enormously increased expenses of the Federal Government, as well as the normal increases of the local governments, we can look for this item to be between 6 and 7 billions in the future. Putting together such data as we have, the normal distribution of income at the 1918 price level, may be surmised"to be something like the following: Billion dollars. 16 million families receiving the minimum of subsistence 21 4 million families receiving between minimum and $2,000 7 V/i million families receiving between $2,000 and $3,000 .. i 660,000 families receiving over $3,000 20 Government expenses 6 Unaccounted for 10 Total 70 During the war, savings were diverted to the payment for Liberty bonds and other known items, so that it is possible to check up these estimates. War expenses amounted to $15,500,000,000; gov- ernment loans to our allies to another $8,500,000,- 000, and in addition there was an annual trade bal- igig 189 THE DIAL ance of some 3 billions, making a total of about 16 billions per year. In addition, there were issued in- dustrial and railroad securities amounting to nearly $1,500,000,000 per year, state and local bonds of about another half a billion, and agricultural sav- ings which may be estimated at about three to four billions. Since a large part of the latter was taken up in Liberty loans, this should probably be re- duced to 2 billions. The total known savings were therefore in the neighborhood of 20 billions; and enough is known of other items to make one sure that this figure is a conservative one. In corrobora- tion of this, it is interesting to note that Dr. Friday estimates the surplus for 1918 at 22 billions. We conclude, therefore, that the normal national income at present is sufficiently large to permit of a surplus above the lowest level of existence of at least twenty billions; and we venture the guess that it is somewhere between 25 and 30 billions. That is to say, the surplus is between one-third and one-half of the total income. What guidance can be drawn from these facts in regard to our future policy? Clearly the doc- trine of subsistence wages cannot hold under any such large surplus; nor can its modern counterpart that any increase in wages must necessarily result in a rise in prices which will leave the status quo where it was before. Whatever fault there may be with the economic order of today, it is not in the produc- tion end, for the annual income is immense beyond a former generation's wildest dreams. Improve- ments can undoubtedly be made. The fact that our production was maintained during 1917 and 1918, with from two to four million men in the army sug- gests that the unutilized forces of previous years were considerable. The unemployment of our workers or capital serves equally to reduce the na- tional income when measured in terms of goods. Competitive wastes in the coal mining, lumber, and oil industries have been officially reported. A re- duction of twenty per cent, of our manufacturing output would go far towards wiping out the sur- plus available for distribution. On the other hand, a similar increase would greatly enlarge the sum. Aside from an extension of public ownership and cooperative production and distribution, the most hopeful element in the maintenance of production is the safeguarding of the spirit of enterprise upon which the present economic order is founded. As long as business men work for profit, they must have reasonable assurance of such profits. Fear of loss is as powerful a deterrent to production as the hope of gain is a stimulant. An increased knowl- edge of the facts, such as has been supplied by the War Trade Board, is an essential factor in the situation, and will do much to keep production at the maximum. In certain industries, cooperation is a safeguard against loss, and there are instances in which combination under government control serves to stimulate production. But while profits are essential to maintain and increase production, they fail of their purpose when they are earned without accomplishing this result; and they likewise fail when the profits are measur- ably out of proportion to the social benefit gained. It is the widespread feeling that such is the case at present which is the basis of the outcry against profiteering. A decade ago it had its counterpart in the blind hatred for the trusts. That there is a reality at the bottom of this sentiment is but too clearly proven in the records of the Federal Trade Commission; and at times it appears to nullify all the benefits of the profit system, and lead those who hope for improvement in despair into the ranks of socialism. But despite the undoubted attractions of their program, it must require an undaunted courage to have the temerity to hope for an increased production over that of which capitalism has given proof. Only the most overwhelming proof could justify a far-reaching change in our methods of pro- duction in the face of the tremendous wealth which capitalism annually brings forth. It is in the distribution of income that the capi- talistic regime has most signally failed. That a country with so large a surplus should still leave the vast majority of laborers on the verge of star- vation must appear uncalled for, particularly in view of the fact that during the war, with all its' accompanying wastage, labor, on the whole was as highly paid as at any previous time. The proposi- tion that real wages must be reduced just at the mo- ment when this wastage is ended must cause one to pause and consider. It is said that future produc- tion depends on the reinvestment of present savings, and that the expenses of the war were paid by sacri- ficing these savings. In the main, this is borne out by the facts. Dr. Friday has shown that the issue of new industrial securities, state and municipal bonds, and corporate surplus all fell to about one- half of their normal level. But the crux of the matter is reached when it is asked to whom the future production brought about by the investment of savings would accrue. If it is still to leave-the surplus in the hands of the 665,000 income tax payers, while the twenty million remain in the same hand-to-mouth condition, then the savings are scarcely worth while. On the other hand, if a part of the surplus were diverted to the 20 million it would greatly increase their capacity to save. To be concrete, one-half of the smallest estimate of our surplus is $10,000,000,000, or an average of $500 for every family in the country; that is, su 9° September 6 THE DIAL raise them to the minimum of comfort. In all prob- ability, this would not all go to increasing the con- sumption, although what part of it would be in- vested there is no way of estimating. Even a smaller sum would lift all families above the sub- sistence level. There is a wide leeway for experi- mentation without removing the stimulus for profit from the more enterprising and capable, who may be represented by the 665,000 taxpayers. How can such a redistribution take place with- out affecting the volume of production? That is the real question to be solved, if the advantages of the present social order are to be stabilized and maintained against the possibility of revolution. The ways in which not to do it are clearer than the positive methods. It cannot be done through the reduction of output which may result from low- ering the speed of work; it cannot be done by means of sabotage or a general strike; and it caiv not be done by capitalistic or other combinations which reduce the output in order to raise prices. The first step to ensure the distribution of the sur- plus is the continued creation of the surplus—and this' means physical product. Many intelligent suggestions are before the public, and experiment is the order of the day. It will probably be accomplished by pressure from numerous sources—an increase of taxes on wealth and inheritance, profit sharing, minimum wages, shop committees, and unions. The object of this analysis is to point out that the hope of a contented social order has a solid basis of fact behind it, and that the attempt to bring about the reality is cap- able of success. „. ,_. _, Oswald vV. Kvauth. The Literary Drug Traffic YVhy read stories? Why write them? Im- portant they seem to be. A glance at the formidable pages of advertising through which they straggle might suggest that upon the short story hangs the commercial welfare of the United States. The reader starts the story—why he starts at all is a ques- tion with interesting answers—and follows his heroine for perhaps three pages with no obstacles except an illustration to be detoured; as he nears the point where the heroine first suspects the man in the frock coat of being a Bolshevist in disguise, cabalistic numbers send him plunging through the magazine to find the story a thin trickle in a deep canyon of advertising. Frequently the canyon is so deep that the eye holds to the story with diffi- culty; the scenery is more spectacular. Well, why not? Business is important, and business pays more for the advertisement than the editor pays for the story. If the story itself were held of more import- ance, no doubt some scheme of juxtaposition would be evolved to make use of the reader's mood. A story of a woman stranded on poverty by the death of her husband might well wind between insurance advertisements. The possibilities are infinite. This however is a situation rather than an explanation. Aside from this importance reflected upon short stories by their commercial utility, a certain vica- rious necessity shines upon them from the books made out of them and about them. For at least a quarter of a century there have been volumes on how to write short stories. Recently another type of volume has appeared, a sort of sport, bred from those manuals and from magazine stories them- selves, useful to run bv the side of the manuals. Today's Short Stories Analyzed, by Robert Wilson Neal (Oxford University Press), is a collection of stories, non-critical except the implied criticism in selection, with elaborate and conscientious analysis of the technique of each story. Mr. Neal prefaces the volume with this statement: "the contes of today are, therefore they deserve appre- ciation." Such a basis of judgment is pragmatic rather than revealing. The Best Short Stories of 1918, Edward J. O'Brien's hardy annual (Small Maynard), is definitely critical in its selection and is free from the elaboration of technical signposts put out in the first volume. Mr. O'Brien in his preface announces that he has set himself " the task of disengaging the essential human qualities in our contemporary fiction which when chronicled con- scientiously by our literary artists may be called criticism of life." He says too that the poetry of life seems to him of more spiritual value than its prose. His volume, perhaps illustrating that prefer- ence of his, should be called The Best Stories of 1918 As Seen Through Mr. O'Brien's Tempera- ment. I come back to the two questions: why write stories? why read them? The answers to the sec- ond query must signify more than any answer to the first. They should perhaps include the answer to the first. For unless story writing is a form of self-indulgence and nothing more, the audience in its reasons for reading short stories is a force crea- ting those stories. On the surface the answers are simple. I read to be amused, to be entertained, to forget myself, to while away an hour. What then is amusing, 1919 191 THE DIAL self-obliterating? You might well wonder, if you should select a half dozen magazines of wide cir- culation, what in the selves of the millions of read- ers submitted to temporary annihilation of the sort provided. What poverty of existence permitted it- self for an hour to be covered by such flimsy rags! Is it in part the old story of the scullery maid flee- ing from the greasy pots of her life into rose-hung arbors where Lady Geraldine waits for her lord? The reading public of America has largely escaped the scullery stage in practical affairs of life at least. At the risk of seeming to take with too great seriousness the business of magazine fiction, I should like to search for an answer to the query, Why read stories? in certain considerations of the way of life among ordinary folks. There are two great •ends of life^—pleasure and reality. We start after the first the minute we are born. We are forced into some pursuit of the second soon after that event. We find early enough that we have an easy escape from a world where effort is necessary into a soft land of phantasy. Are we dull in school? What simpler than to prop up a geography and be- hind it drift into a world where schools are for- gotten and we are jolly pirates? Do our parents misunderstand us? Easy enough to conquer them in a death bed scene, where they gather, contrite and grief shaken, around us. Are we clumsy or homely? A day dream will invest us with the graces of the ancient gods. All this with no effort, with none of the bruising which would come from an attempt to reach a hundredth of the same satis- faction in everyday affairs. But when we climb into maturity, when we have love affairs with real people, when we have our living to make, we have to shut ourselves sternly out of this pleasant land of phantasying. If we don't, we find ourselves finally tucked away in an asylum. The average human being does come out of his day dreams to make love, to tackle his job, to throw himself against people, material things, conditions in such a way that he effects changes which arc pleasant to him. He finds that when he affects reality as he wishes, he has after all the highest kind of pleasure. The trouble is however that all this is work—that he doesn't always succeed in his attempts. He turns then to art in some form as a substitute for his childhood's day dreaming. He might take to drink for the same reason. He de- sires enhancement of his own rather dull life. He wishes his near horizons extended. He may wish to meet interesting people, to travel to far places, to encounter emotions outside the gamut of his own experiences. The artist, as an individual highly sensitized to values of life and capable of giving form to these values, performs this function of vicarious day dreaming. He is answering the de- mand of the pleasure principle in man. But if he is an artist, what he creates, while it serves man's pleasure, has at the same time a bond- age to reality. It interprets, vivifies, enhances, pro- ducing in the man who sought it for his pleasure an ability to make his pleasure find its roots in the actual ends of life; removing him from lotus strewn shores of infantile islands into the greater beauty of finely developed maturity. The "happy ending" is a demand so common that it needs few words. Is it not again a quality of day dreams that they must turn out well? Who would wish for a vicarious day dream which failed to follow this obvious design? For the happy end- ing must be obvious; the hero does make enough money to win the heroine; the heroine who has fallen under suspicion—perhaps she was actually caught opening a safe—is proven innocent of all except the highest motives. We wish life to work that way. It doesn't. We recede into the easy re- gion of dreams where, as in the good old fairy tales, things all come out as they should. Is there any objection to raise against this sit- uation, any objection, that is, which has a basis other than a puritanic insistence upon reality? It may be unfair or ridiculous to line up short stories un- der any flag of art. The editors do demand a de- gree of technical excellence; these day dreams must have intricacy beyond the power of the lay imagina- tion. Perhaps out of the neatly made plots comes to the reader the sense of well-rounded, finished life, a sense existence itself can rarely furnish. On the whole, the implications seem to be that the world is so unhappy a place that it becomes endurable only through escape. Stories are then a means of heartening humanity, and are thus to be praised in degree as they provide the day dreams we can not compass for ourselves. They are a mild hashish, a literary dope with no evil results. Note that you must admit two things: first, that the world is unendurable, and second, that you can find pleasure only in representations of it as you thought it should be before you found out how it was. Further, you assume that day dreams are not habit forming drugs. They might not be, if it were not for the tend- ency they feed. Here is a tremendous force how- ever, working constantly to ease life, not by adjust- ment and competent handling, not by understand- ing and mastery, but by slipping away, by retreat- ing into soft, dark, warm places, by adolescent make-believe. Indulgence in the whims of this force carries one constantly backward, never for- ward. And in the long run, unless one submits entirely to this force and becomes the onl'~ - 192 September 6 THE DIAL ful day dreamer, say of the dementia praecox type, one grows constantly more wretched through the contrast between an unmastered existence and this rosy dream world. Stories in themselves may not aggravate this tendency to such a degree as to force us to consider them with profound seriousness. Still, people read them; look at the circulatipn figures of the success- ful magazines. If these stories should partake of the "quality of art, they would share its result. For nowhere else perhaps, can there be so powerful a combination of man's desire for pleasure and his need for comprehension and reality. In fiction you have the actual stuff of life, human beings, their motives, their feelings, their struggles. The editors do recognize this desire for dreams fulfilled; they label it the great American weak- ness, sentimentalism. As managers of periodicals which must please readers in order to pay the edi- tors' salaries, and in order to furnish advertisers with a public, they may cater to that weakness as willingly as an illicit vender of "coke" caters to another weakness with the same source. Public opinion has been trained to hold the business of the drug vender dangerous. The business of run- ning a magazine is still highly respectable; and the editors, because their aim is frankly commercial and their existence depends upon financial success, escape behind this barrier of necessity. They " give the people what they want." They aren't them- selves guilty of writing the stories; they only sift out from the manuscripts which pour into their offices whatever seems their grist. Where then does the responsibility rest? Are the writers of the stories responsible? That brings up the second query: why do people write stories? During the last few years I have put that query to several hundred people, some of whom were writing stories which landed some- where, some of whom were writing stories which might someday be published, and others who were finding out that writing was too much work. Their answers fall into a few general divisions. One woman to be sure wished to learn how to write stories in order to narrate the life of her little poodle, which had died. Most of the hundreds how- ever had a wider impulse. Some of them are women who wish more pocket money. They are married, or they are only daughters; they don't wish to break the custom of home life. They use words; what easier than to learn their combinations and sell them! Others, both men and women, are dissatisfied with their occupations and see maga- zines as an Arcadia to which they need only technic as an "open sesame." Some are reforming spirits, pager to learn how to sugar-coat their messages to the world. Rarely is there a person, man or woman, who possesses the curious urge toward ex- pression in words which will not let him rest, who must force into shape his experience of people, or reshape imaginatively his own experience. There is no doubt, under these surface reasons, a deeper, less conscious drive toward self-expression in some creative activity. Perhaps you find in schools of sculpture or painting or music, students who have only that vague drive without the peculiar instinct toward expression in form or color or sound. I think you find them there far less often than in classes of short story writing. The medium in which they must work seems more remote from their ordinary life; some definite knack must lead them into clay of paint. But who doesn't think, secretly or openly, that he can write a story! A. thing made of words about people; he uses words all day long, and he has his own experiences as well as those of his friends. There is too another op- portunity for day dreaming here. In a story you may work out life as you can't in reality. If your day dream don't differ too widely from your neigh- bor's, and you have industrious patience, you may learn a craft of writing and sooner or later find yourself part of the editors' grist. And so there are classes in short story writing; there are correspondence courses for people who find the classes inaccessible; there are textbooks on how to write; there are collections of stories dissected for their mechanism. The purpose of these classes and books is to teach the students how to break into magazines. Those stories break in which please the editors. The stories chosen by the editors are those which will satisfy the public craving. The whole business is thus reduced to something quite remote from art; it becomes a traffic in soothing-syrups. Occasionally even through this rigid circle bursts a real story, one written because the author wished to write it, had to write it—a story created and not made. Whose is the fault that stories of this qual- ity are rare? Not the editors; they are making magazines to sell. Not the writers of stories, per- haps; it is much easier to make a story than to create one, and if a market exists for manufactured wares, why not feed it? If there were a desire for stories with vitality or humor or beauty or vision or com- ment, there might be more of such stories. The people who read are a creative force; the stories they read are made in part by them. What can produce in the reading public a recognition of the pleasure in art as over against the retrogressive satisfaction in day dreams? Such recognition is given a good story after its appearance; it needs also to precede the appearance as a demand. Helen R. Hull. igig J93 THE DIAL I Of Mediocrity and Its Excellences n these United States, among the thousands who are manufacturing prose fiction, those who may rightfully assert their mediocrity are all too few. Yes, hordes there are who in their better moments might well lament their failure to attain that sturdy mediocrity to which they were mani- festly ordained. Now there is to be no denunciation here and no naming of many names. When the stones have been cast, one not uncommonly finds that his own house has a little glass in its walls. Let us rather for the moment consider impassively why so many writers of prose fiction are not mediocre; and thereby we shall come ever nearer to a discrimina- tion between your false mediocrity and your true, and to the analysis of the Simon-pure thing itself. First of all it is to be noted that mediocrity is in the middle register; hence on the nether reaches of the scale one will find prose fiction that is beneath mediocrity. According to tradition a certain notable amount of it was produced in a college that required its freshmen at the year's end to make a short story. Inept, rebellious, wretched with loath- ing, those freshmen, it is said, wrote stories which blasted and slew- with the chill of absolute zero in fictional merit. Have done with all such! We deal with a better thing—true mediocrity. Other prose fictions there are too that on the scale of extrinsic merit will measure equal to medi- ocrity, yet which may not with aptness be called mediocre. The popular magazines subsist upon them. At worst they are sometimes at their best technically; that is, when the plot motive force is love o' women—svelt creatures that are very mer- maids for swimming and that have been given to cast aside conventionality and its swathings. There is workmanlike laying of words in some of those descriptions. But that which denies these writings excellence likewise, in a sense, denies them medi- ocrity: there is no sound prompting back of them, neither artistic incitement not to be paltered with, nor wholesome prosaic conviction. It may be that evil men have written these tales with lip-licking satisfaction; it may be that God- fearing men, fathers whose babes prattle, have written them with disgust. No man may say. If the fathers have written them, it is because prat- ders come high and gasoline is as rubies. Let no man do more than pity the father who must dwell upon the rondures of the cold sea-maiden, upon the vagaries of the girl who will investigate for her- self, or the wife who unwives herself. His creations are harmful, but there are more harmful things under the stars. And he doubtless has many quite harmless potboilers to his credit, potboilers as beneficent as honest mediocrity. Such potboilers, in truth, can only regretfully be excluded from mediocrity; but they must be ex- cluded. Average the potboiler may be, as senti- mentally banal as heart could desire; but it is al- ways artfully average. This distinction, finical as it may seem, must be taken to heart. It has noth- ing to do with externals; it will not solace the dis- criminating reader who has fallen upon the Happy Ending or Red Blood or the Noble-Hearted Crim- inal or Heart Interest or Clean-Cut Heroes or Fine Description. It is not a distinction that the critic may make with certainty. But it is truth and has to do with the well-being of those who write. Simon-pure mediocrity then is the best work of a mediocre man. While men remain a little below, the angels, it is inevitable. It is not so excellent as excellence; but what would you? It is not to be wished away; it is not a bad habit that the world of letters can lay aside by stern exercise of will. The lamentable fact remains that all who will write and who should write are not touched with genius. Mediocrity should be fostered. That is, it should be given its just due. It must be told that it is mediocrity and it must be shown in just what par- ticulars it is not excellence, but it must not be ut- terly condemned. It must of course be campaigned against; yet even so it may be fostered. The cam- paigners must quite serenely know that mediocrity may never be suppressed, and they need but one slogan, one homely and platitudinous slogan: let each man do his best. The mediocrity sorely needs encouragement. His is a grievous task, for, if he deserves the title, he must ever be trying to stretch up to excellence and by the same token never reaching it. This hope- ful hopelessness is rare and much to be commended. What if a man's novel or short story is a bit feeble or maudlin or perfervid. He himself is the better for the exercise of his talents, the clearer of thought, the more eased of restrained emotion. In truth it is his inalienable right to make fiction if he so desire and by all odds the best thing he can do. True mediocrity writes not entirely for fame or emulation or gain. It writes because it is happy when it is writing or has just written. What harm if a man, especially a man with some trace of talent, devise stories for himself? Indeed, what will serve the purpose so well! Narrative is largely vicarious experience; another man's story is twice removed, your own but once 194 September 6 THE DIAL If I am ugly, feeble, and timorous and shall never be otherwise, why should I not to the best of my modest ability write myself into a clean-cut hero? I f I know the houses on my street and the view from my trolley windows until I detest each atom of all that I pass each day, why may I not gladden my eyes with what I take to be Himalayan dawns, or why should I not dare many strange and difficult lands of Never Never? What if the select few do read and run? Let them consort with heroes to their own liking, and let them seek the magic jasements that grant them wider, weirder vistas of stranger and more lovely lands. Yes, let them construct their own windows or, if none else will suffice, create their own heroes. And who knows but among those that have read and run there may be some who have profited withal. Mediocrity is part of the community of letters. Though we reckon literary progress by names—the Age of Dryden, the Age of Tennyson— though we would not if we could, pore over the forgotten works of little men, we should not be utterly unaware that they ever wrote. Biographers are fond of pointing out what one great man owes another, but more rarely do they estimate what the big man owes to the little man of his day—the presentation of a great theme albeit inadequately, the stimulation to set right erring popular opinion or to voice that opinion as it should be, the very incentive that comes from a consciousness of fellow- workers, of companionship, however faltering, in a high emprize. If all literature worth taking into account were among the Hundred Bests, they them- selves might perhaps not be so invaluable as they are. » Among the Hundred Bests there is mediocrity. No man with the impressionable temperament of genius is always sure of himself. Over-driven hob- bies, too strong impulsion by the time-spirit, too much exposure to the winds of doctrine, have brought many a genius to mediocrity and worse. Prose fiction particularly slants sharply toward it. Novels are made of what usually is in outward form the contemporaneous and the transient and are woefully susceptible of being written with a purpose. More than this, realistic prose fiction, except for the real- istic prose romance, is the apotheosis of the com- monplace. Of all the stubborn, treacherous ma- terial with which the artist must struggle, none is worse than the commonplace. It is at once the bane and the glory of the novelist and short story writer that to him is allotted this hard fight. Small wonder that he wavers now and then. There is cause for charitableness in this, but no -ause for shamefacedness and deprecation. With- out the twaddle in Dickens, the loquacity in Thack- eray, the endless realism in Tolstoi, we should not be so aware of the man behind the book. And the books would be thereby less the projection of an interpretation of life by one who knows whereof he speaks. Faultless in execution, the books would be the better for all time, but less comforting just now to the critic who is not himself a compound of genius unalloyed, and less potent for the out and out mediocrity who himself writes fiction. When all is said, however, the masterpieces of fiction are for the few, the works of mediocrity for the many. Of the millions of the Man in the Street or of the Man on the Country Road, hundreds of thousands there are who lead worthy lives with no reading of fiction whatever. There are as many more, equally valuable to the world, who read fiction but not the masterpieces. Some of these would read the masterpieces if their fathers before them had done so or if some force beyond the family circle had trained them to a liking for excellence. But there are many readers whom no power of man could have brought, even in the most pliant days of youth, to know excellence when they see it, much less to like it. Mediocre prose fiction is for such. If a man can not get satisfaction from Under Western Eyes, it is well for him if he can get it from V V's Eyes or even from Eyes of the World. By all means let him try Under Western Eyes, but do not declaim against him if it leave him cold and weary and if he get a grateful warmth of the heart from Eyes of the World. He may be a tired man and unfitted by a life of commercial directness for Conrad's oblique story-telling. Masterpieces, how- ever familiar their diction, have a way of speaking in strange or outworn tongues that many an intelli- gent, hard-working man may never hope to com- mand. Contemporary prose fiction however, talks the language of the street and road for the very month and day. And it can warm hearts, never fear. For a little price the pages of magazine or of novel can grant who knows what sustaining examples of fortitude, wrhat pictures of gentility and tenderness, what assuaging of the wanderlust, what spacious atmosphere of great deeds for those who are stifled with trivialities! Honest mediocrity will respond to honest medi- ocrity and will draw from it pleasure that is almost delight and edification that is almost exaltation. There are those for w7hom Harold Bell Wright and E. P. Roe have done all that art can do. Heaven grant that Messrs. Wright and Roe be true mediocrities, and that there be much even truer mediocrity in print. Enough of it there would be- igu) *95 THE DIAL token the uncommercializing of our fiction and the spread, er at least the preparation for the spread, of that admirable thing unhappily called Culture. Right culture is based on reverence for what is artistically sincere, and it calls for ceaseless, sincere productive effort. The man who tries| to produce excellence and fails and knows that he fails sees in it thereafter a value that he could not in any other way have discovered. We need the geniuses, and the wrorld and all future generations need them; but it would be well for us if we could at this moment boast of more, many more, true fictional mediocrities. They more surely than the geniuses would denote a soundness in the commonality. True culture is not only ven- erative but creative, and creative in the man of few talents as in the man of many. We might, it is true, spend our tears that literary inferiority, like crime and thistles should ever have come into the world, that verse fiction has not sur- passed prose fiction in popularity, that there are those who can never be deeply moved by the master- pieces. Such tears are wept. We might insist that all men read only the masterpieces, that none but the masters write. There are those who do this. They may be right, for the human race may be ulti- mately perfectable. But quite as surely the world may end next year, and in the meantime scant good be done. If however, we are not tearfully or un- compromisingly insistent, we may content ourselves with the demand that each man do what he is capable of for literary excellence, that at least he be made aware of its existence; but we need not scornfully wither, nay, we may even hearten with commendation, the man who on Sunday afternoon peruses in slippered ease the Post that purports to appear on Saturday eve; and we may assert stoutly and without equivocation that very fitly its pages should set before him a sufficiency of honest and thorough-going mediocrity. ,,T T ,„ 666 Walter L. Myers. The Economic Aftermath in France and England A he situation in distracted Europe is no more settled and seems likely to become even less so in the near future. France celebrated the conclusion of peace with Germany on July 14 and England celebrated it on July 19, but the celebrations in London, at any rate, quite lacked the spontaneity and enthusiasm of November II, when relief that the war was over found its natural expression. Now nobody is inclined to rejoice, for everybody feels that this peace is no peace, that it does not fulfill the conditions of a lasting settlement. More- over not only are there still wars going on in Cen- tral and Eastern Europe, but every country is torn by internal conflicts and civil war is looming on the horizon. In England the strike of the Yorkshire miners, which has been going on for several weeks, is not settled (July), and we are faced with the possibil- ity of a far more important strike, which might easily develop into something like a revolution. The Parliamentary Committee of the Trade Union Congress having taken no action on the resolution of the Labor Party conference at Southport call- ing for "direct action," the Triple Alliance lost patience and decided by an overwhelming majority to take a ballot of the Unions affiliated to it on the question of a general strike against intervention m Russia and Hungary either by the supply of men or material, against the continuance of conscription, and against the use of troops for strike-breaking. The threat of the strike has already led to a Gov- ernment decision to withdraw all British troops from Russia, but the assistance in money and kind to Denikin is to be continued and that the Trade Unionists will not tolerate. The unions have reversed their decision to carry through a refer- endum of the membership and have decided to sub- mit the question to a conference. Bye-elections continue to show that the Government has com- pletely lost the confidence of the country. The last two were at Swansea in Wales and at Both- well in Scotland. In Wales Mr. Lloyd George still retains a good deal of his influence and the ministerial Coalition held the Swansea seat, but by a greatly reduced majority. At Bothwell, where the Coalition candidate had a majority of 332 last December, the Labor Party won the seat with a majority of 7168. It is now clear that not a single Coalition seat in Great Britain is really safe. Mr. Winston Churchill is to a great extent respon- sible for the unpopularity of the Government, which he will certainly bring to ruin if he is not checked or got rid of; he is a reckless and irresponsible fire- brand. In the six bye-elections already held the aggregate Coalition poll has decreased by 23,702 as compared with last December and the aggregate poll of the Opposition candidates has increased by J5>329. The polls have been even smaller than they were in December—even at Bothwell only 69 per cent of the electors voted—although gteat 196 September 6 THE DIAL numbers of soldiers have been demobilized since the general election; this fact is without doubt a symptom of indifference to parliamentary action and of growing distrust of parliamentary methods. The weakness and incompetence of the Labor Party in the House of Commons is strengthening anti- parliamentarism. • In France the twenty-four-hour general strike ar- ranged as a demonstration against intervention in Russia and dear living was abandoned at the last moment. The Executive Committee of the General Confederation of Labor gave the defeat of the Government in the Chamber on July 18 as the reason for its climb-down, but in fact the abandon- ment of the strike was due to the fear that it would not be successful. Many French Trade Union- ists—including some of the strongest advocates of direct action—have always been averse to such a general strike merely for the purpose of mak- ing a demonstration; they hold, with reason, that the results obtained are not adequate to the trouble and loss occasioned. If they strike, they want to strike to some practical purpose. Nevertheless the abandonment of the strike at the eleventh hour is a severe set-back to the General Confederation of Labor and a triumph for M. Clemenceau, who had threatened repressive measures. Its first result was that the Chamber on July 22 rejected by a large majority the identical resolution censuring the eco- nomic policy of the Government which it had passed on July 18 under the threat of the strike. Had the strike been held and been successful, the Clemenceau Ministry would probably by now have been out of office. The bungling tactics of the C. G. T. (General Confederation of Labor) have given M. Clemenceau a new lease of life and he is likely now to remain in office until after the gen- eral election, which can hardly take place before October. By way of showing his contempt for the C.G.T., M. Clemenceau has now refused permis- sion to the Italian delegates to the International Trade Union Conference at Amsterdam to cross France and they have been prevented from attend- ing the conference, although they had passports from their own Government. The collapse of the C.G.T. has also had a serious repercussion in Italy, where the general strike took place on July 21 according to arrangement and where the defection of France is regarded as a slap in the face to Italian Socialists and Trade Unionists, who were thus left to strike alone. At a special meeting of the National Confederal Committee of the C.G.T., hastily summoned and held on July 21 and 22, M. Jouhaux delivered a long speech vindicating the action of the Executive, which was approved by the Committee after a lively discussion in the course of which the Execu- tive was severely criticized. M. Jouhaux's speech was mainly composed of empty rhetoric and vague generalities and did not carry the matter much further. The rank and file of French Trade Union- ists have certainly reason to complain that the Executive of the C.G.T. has let them down. It should never have announced a general strike unless it was sure to be able to carry it out and, having announced it, it should have gone through with it. The whole business is an example of blundering and bad management which augurs ill for the leadership of French Trade Unionism. One of its worst resulfs will be a further diminution of the confidence of Trade Unionists in their lead- ers, which was already sadly impaired. One of the gravest factors in the present Labor situation in France is the lack of leadership. Some day or other some sectional strike about a purely economic ques- tion will suddenly develop into a general revolu- tionary movement and, unless there are men ready and able to take control of such a movement, the consequences may be disastrous for Labor, for it may end in nothing but futile violence and bloody repression. One does not see at present where such men are to be found; the events might, of course, produce them, but the present leaders of the C.G.T. are not likely to be among them. They have not the confidence of the rank and file to a sufficient extent to be able to direct them, and they are likely, as I said in my last article, to be over- whelmed. Never was the loss of Jaures so palpable as now. Few leaders in history have had the con- fidence of their followers so completely as he had. He has no successor. The present leaders of the C.G. T. seem to be over-prudent when courage is needed and too hasty when the occasion demands prudence. The Confederal Committee, however, took a course on July 22 which was a new dsparture in French Trade Union policy. By ninety-one votes agains: sixteen, with eight abstentions, it adopted a resolu- tion definitely declaring in favor of Free Trade—of the suppression of customhouse barriers and the free entry into France of raw materials and manufac- tured goods from all countries. Until recently the question of Free Trade and Protection had been almost entirely neglected by French Socialists and Trade Unionists, but the appalling cost of living has forced it on their attention. During the war law after law has been passed and decree after decree has been issued to prevent profiteering, with- out the smallest result; prices continued to rise and are still rising. At Jast it dawned upon people that one of the causes of high prices is the closing 1919 197 THE DIAL of the frontiers to foreign products. Economic questions, to which little attention was paid in France before the war, have now become too important to be ignored and the public has dis- covered that England is now as ever the cheapest country in Europe because England has Free Trade. Although Mr. Lloyd George's Government is try- ing to foist Protection upon us by a back-door and prices here are higher than they ought to be in consequence of restriction of imports, the cost of living is less than half what it is in France and wages are higher than in that country. This dis- covery has led to a Free Trade movement among the French urban populations, which has grown very rapidly and is now formidable. It is further strengthened by the growing conviction that uni- versal Free Trade is one of the essential conditions of permanent peace. The French Socialist papers are now all in favor of Free Trade and one bourgeois paper of the Left, L'Oeuvre, is making, a vigorous campaign in favor of the suppression of all import duties. The opposition to Free Trade will come from the agricultural population, which has been up to now the spoiled child oi the Third Republic. Agri- cultural profits are actually exempt from income tax and agriculturists are even exempted from the pro- visions of the laws against profiteering, which, to be sure, are totally ineffective. The rural popula- tion, although the .constant exodus from the coun- try into the towns has greatly diminished it, is still nearly half the population of France. Fear of Free Trade on the part of the agriculturists is jus- tified to the extent that, with their present obso- lete methods, they would hardly be able to compete in an open market. The whole system of French agriculture needs drastic overhauling and some modification of peasant proprietorship has become urgently necessary. The peasant proprietor has many great qualities, but he is intensely conserva- tive and quite out of touch with modern methods; moreover, even if he wished to use modern machinery, he has not the capital to buy it. The system of small isolated production has in fact broken down and only complete and extensive coop- eration can save French agriculture. The heavy losses in the war have made the labor difficulty, which was already becoming serious, acute. It will not be possible to find sufficient labor to con- tinue French agricultural production on the present methods. A radical change is necessary in any case; Free Trade would make it immediately necessary. The attitude of the agricultural population in this regard makes it difficult for any of the bourgeois political parties to advocate Free Trade, for their electors are now mainly drawn from the rural districts. That is the reason why the elec- toral manifesto of the Radical Party, which held its national congress on July 26 and 27, is so weak on the question of dear living. Being chiefly a "country party," it dares not mention the first and most essential remedy and is obliged to deal in vague generalities. But it was more outspoken in certain other regards. M. Mandel—his real name is Rothschild—who is M. Clemenceau's Grand Vizier and general factotum and who shares with M. Loucheur the effective government of France, had elaborated a beautiful scheme for combining all the bourgeois parties, including Royalists and reactionaries, against the Socialists at the coming general election. The Royalists hailed the scheme with enthusiasm; in the Action Francaise M. Maurras declared that he and his friends would accept any and every alliance against "Bolsheviks and Caillautists." One of the objects of the pro- posed coalition is reported to be the election of M. Clemenceau to the Presidency of the Republic next January in succession to M. Poincare, whose term of office will then expire. The proceedings at the Radical Congress, how- ever, show that all bourgeois Republicans are not prepared to fall in with M. Mandel's ingenious arrangements. It also showed a sharp cleavage of opinion between the rank and file of the party; and the majority of the Radical deputies, who support the Clemenceau Ministry. In spite of the opposi- tion of M. Rene Renoult, chairman of the Radical party in the Chamber, whom M. Clemenceau is believed to have designated as his successor in the Premiership, the Congress adopted by an over- whelming majority a resolution formally instruct- ing the Radical deputies to " exact " from the Gov- ernment the immediate suppression of. martial law and the censorship and to give their support only to a Government "realizing the union of Repub- licans," that is to say, to refuse it to the Govern- ment of M. Clemenceau. It remains to be seen whether the Radical deputies will fall into Jine; if they do, the days of the Clemenceau Ministry are numbered, but I am inclined to think that they will not, or at any rate that a sufficient number will continue to support the Government to keep it in power until the general election. The Con- gress also passed unanimously a second resolution declaring its readiness "to facilitate the union of all the parties of the Left"—a phrase which includes the Socialists—and its decision to "repu- diate any elected representative or candidate who may consent to figure on the same list as those that have incessantly combated the laical, democratic. 1 98 September 6 THE DIAL and social Republic.” This is the end, so far as the Radical party is concerned, of M. Mandel's scheme; and the Radical party is at present the largest political party in France, numbering about one-third of the Chamber. Public opinion has at last compelled M. Loucheur to modify his economic policy. Most of the pro- hibitions of imports have been withdrawn and the proposed supplementary ad valorem duties have been abandoned, but the existing import duties are to be increased—in some cases trebled—so that there is no immediate prospect of a fall in prices. M. Loucheur has also been obliged to give way in regard to the surplus material of the American army, which the French Government has now bought on terms very favorable to it. Previously M. Loucheur had refused to buy any part of it or to allow anybody else to buy it and had even forbidden the American authorities to give any- thing away. The press campaign, especially in L'Oeuvre and L'Humanite, against M. Loucheur's fondness for the profiteers is thus beginning to have an effect. Mr. Henry Ford must have some credit in the matter. It is probably known in America that, when the Armistice was declared, a large number of Ford motorcars bought by the French Government were in the port of Bordeaux, where they have since been left to rust to oblige the French motorcar manufacturers. Mr. Ford of- fered to pay the ad valorem import duty of 70 per cent on these cars and then sell them to the French public at the price at which he had sold them to the French Government when he had no import duty to pay. Although this proposal would have meant that the French Government recovered the whole cost of the cars with 70 per cent of their value in addition, M. Loucheur refused it and M. Ford published the facts in the French press. The Citroën company replied with an advertise- ment telling the public not to bother itself about foreign cars, for there would soon be plenty of French cars on the market—a promise not yet ful- filled. Mr. Ford retorted with full particulars of M. Loucheur's interests in the Citroën company. Robert DeLL. - Russia and International Economics Surrºrise FROM MANY economic and indus- trial troubles the world (even the world of indus- trialists and financiers) seems to have forgotten what is perhaps the main cause of this basic malaise. The destruction of many values as a result of the war is an unescapable fact and the restoration of sound in- ternational economic conditions has been hindered not only by the curtailment of production but by the absence of Russia from the world market and its economic interaction. - From this point of view the present-day state of affairs in Russia acquires more than a political, or even a humanistic interest, it becomes a matter of practical economic importance. Russia's industrial strength is now lower than that of any other period. During the years of the war her export was closed. Many provisions remained unused, and are rotting on the fields of Russia; and her unmeasurable raw materials are out of the world market. This state of affairs has produced fatal international complica- tions with worldwide political implications. The coal difficulties in England, the desperately pessimistic speech of Floyd George, the labor unrest in Italy and in France and even in the richest of countries, in America, show irrefutably that without the aid of Lenin and Communism the economic and industrial organizations of the contemporary state are half destroyed. And under such serious circum- an object of relief is a quite mistaken one. stances Russia, which is able to provide the world with sufficient raw materials" to feed the mills and factories of many industries, is eliminated. The Russian cooperative societies have many times em- phasized that trade and economic intercourse with Russia is possible regardless of the political contro- versies and governmental crises in that country. While all kinds of economic organizations have been destroyed throughout Russia, in Central Russia as well as Siberia, the cooperative societies have alone remained intact and have become powerful as never before. There were several attempts from this quarter to show to the Allies that neither from the political nor from the economic point of view could the blockade wisely be maintained. On February 20, 1919, a special memorandum was presented to the English government by the representative of the All-Russian Cooperative Union. It pointed out in part: The absence of exchange of goods is causing heavy material losses to the commerce and industry of the whole world. As a matter of fact, the notion that nothing is to be had from Russia and that she can be treated only as During the last five years the absence of our export trade and ex- change of goods within the country has brought about an accumulation in the hands of the peasantry of huge re- serves of raw material, grain, eggs . . . hides, flax, and so forth. The raising of the blockade and the re-estab- lishment of an exchange of commodities will bring on the - 1919 I 99 THE DIAL market an enormous quantity of raw materials of which the world stands in such great need at present. The same memorandum states further that the reopening of trade through the cooperatives is pos- sible independently of the Soviet Government, be- cause they are now the only agent of distribution and are ready to complete it even under the control of the representatives of the Allies, guaranteeing that this distribution will be made among all the population regardless of class. Moreover, the lift- ing of the blockade and the opening of trade is bound to restore the normal habits of the nation in economic intercourse, which are now suppressed by the policy of the Allies. No answer followed this memoran- dum. The peace treaty is now signed and the fea- tures of Europe, at least those of the next few years, begin to be defined. The European countries, and especially England, look for the Russian market. And in this respect the economic policy of the Allies toward Russia seems very shortsighted. England is interested in the Russian market, but her interests have peculiar commercial limitations. She fears the power of the cooperatives, and has to weaken them in order to colonize Russia. In my article in THE DIAL for August 9, 1919, I mentioned an attempt in England to organize a special supply company akin to the East Indian Supply Company for a monopolized exploitation of Russia. Involving political controversies England finds support in the representatives of former Russian bankers and big business men who are interested in salvaging their own investments—their capital having been largely transferred from Russia to English banks. Thus under the banner of patriotism all kinds of Economic Leagues have been organized, and these are closely in touch with the British Government. On the other hand, Russia cannot remain any longer without exchange and manufactured articles. It is evident that Germany is the next possibility. Trying to make people afraid of “pro-German- ism" the Allies as a matter of fact are only em- phasizing their own creation. Both Germany and Russia are driven to this rapprochement by the arrangement of the European balance. . In this respect the attitude of the United States can hardly be understood; for two processes are now in operation: 1. Pushing Russia into an al- liance with Germany. 2. Eliminating America from the Russian market. A significant fact was pointed out to me by Mr. A. M. Orloff, Engineer- agriculturist manager of the Odessa Credit Union, and member of a cooperative union, mission that lately visited Italy and England. Before the war Russia received agricultural machinery only from can influence. America. After Brest-Litovsk some machinery was received from Sweden through Germany. But it was not satisfactory. With agricultural machinery it is impossible to shoot or destroy. Nevertheless America with the Allies does not allow it to be im- ported into Russia. At the same time England, which never had more than one or two big factories producing for export has now about ten, and there is reason to believe that the great munition fac- tories were turned into agricultural machinery works in order to get hold of the Russian market as soon as possible and push out the former Ameri- The political undertaking by Eng- land of a military intervention is nothing else there- fore than the realization of a program of economic imperialism. On the other hand after the revolu- tion Russia became a country of small landowner- ship. A small landowner is not in a position to purchase large machinery by himself, and conse- quently the local cooperative society buys the equip- ment and rents to the members. This explains the fact that in South Russia for instance 75 per cent of the rural population is participating in the co- operative movement. The policy of destruction of the cooperative societies is thus a policy in favor of the big landowners and therefore in Siberia, for instance, where influence of England is very strong, Mr. Anatoly Gan in the Russian Economist for May 5, 1919, assails the cooperative societies, and the government of Kolchak is treating them very badly as shown in my article for August 9. Even their paper, Zaria, so often quoted even by Struggling Russia, is now suppressed. More than that, a strong spirit of enmity against America has been cultivated and the same Anatoly Gan on one hand, and the Siberian merchants on the other, are all the time manifesting their sympathy with Eng- land. A resolution against America was passed at the conference of merchants of Vladivostok (Golos Primoria. June 12-13, 1919). In the meantime an international realignment is being per- fected. On one side England, France, and the United States; on the other Russia, Germany, and Japan. Japan has already declared her unwilling- ness to send troops to aid Kolchak, while support- ing all the time Kalmikov and Semenov as pro- Japanese rulers. An economic alliance of Russia with Germany and an understanding if not an alliance with Japan, after granting certain ad- vantages in Manchuria and Siberia, would be a tragic crown to the war to end war. Sup- pressed and offended Germany, disintegrated Rus- sia, aggressive Japan, will present a strong in- centive to war in the near future, because the thorough exploitation of Russia's rich possi- 200 September 6 THE DIAL bilities will make up for the losses of the last five years and for those exacted by the peace treaty. England will not be able then (as she was during the last war) to keep India safe or to blockade Germany. Japan and Russia will open the way for supplies, and can possibly threaten the in- tegrity of the Indian Empire. Great Britain's "agreement" with Persia will hardly remove this danger. Thus the present economic policy toward Russia carries first of all the^bitter promise of a future war. These are, by the way, the views expressed in the memorandum presented to the State Department of the United States on March 20 and on August 7, 1919, by the Representative of the Russian Cooperative Societies, A. M. Berkenheim. No official answer followed. It has to be emphasized that Russia (the post- revolutionary Russia from Kerensky to Lenin in- clusive) was always opposed, to the domination of European capital and inclined to welcome the pene- tration of America in the Russian market, since America is so far away that her capital and products enter the field without any political or diplomatic strings. On March 20 Mr. Berkenheim wrote to the State Department: There is no financial risk involved in this transaction, because the Cooperative Unions are ready to pay for all the merchandise that will pass through their hands. The Cooperative Union will distribute the supplies di- rectly and only to the population, and if so desired will carry on their work under the eyes of the American representatives. It is confidently expected that in view of unbearable economic stress it would not be difficult to effect the necessary agreement and obtain requisite guar- antees. And on August 7 the Cooperatives declared themselves ready to guarantee that no part of the goods should be used for military purposes. America's attitude could be to a certain degree understood if these attempts to reopen the market had not taken place. But otherwise, from the point of view of America's own interest, her de- pendence upon London and Paris is incomprehen- sible, since the policy of the latter two centers brings America only the loss of Russia as a market and the opportunity to participate in a new war. I have not touched upon the human side of the question because it seems to me that a realistic practical analysis is fundamental to an understand- ing. But I cannot help calling attention to the following fact of purely psychological character. After the peace of Brest-Litovsk a great number of German agents, military and civil, came to Russia in order to buy the raw materials exhausted Germany needed, especially fats, in which Russia is very rich and from which explosives are derived. The cooperative societies through their agent bought throughout Russia the entire supply of fats, so that Germany was unable to get a gramme of it. It was an act of great importance in this war. But what Russia did by herself against the Germany of the Kaiser, with whom she was officially at peace, Russia surrounded by the iron link of the Allies will hardly do against the Germany of President Ebert, when her faith in the Allies is lost. That is why psychologically Russia is united in opposition to foreign forces and new governments despite the fact that many are discontented with the Soviet Regime. I just received a message from an old social worker, my colleague in the Ministry of Labor under Kerensky, G. D. Krasinsky, describ- ing the terrible conditions in Russia—starvation, illness, and disaster—and criticising strongly the Moscow Government. But he adds: "And despite all—which is strange—we feel more and more that the spirit of defense is growing in us." This spirit makes Russia strong against Kolchak and Denikin, but under the circumstances it will bring about more international complications than even the spread of Sovietism through half of Europe. If England or France does not see the forest be- cause of the trees—their purely egoistical aspira- tions—why then does America not open her eyes? In a memorandum, of August 6, 1919, we read: > 1. Neither American financial nor trade circles have taken any steps toward the establishment of even pre- liminary requirements for the organization of permanent commercial relations with Russia. 2. No advance has been made toward the execution of the plan advocated by us during five months to foster the economic life of Central Russia, by means of re- storing the exchange of goods through cooperative chan- nels. 3. Judging from the information in our hands at the present time, representatives of German firms have ap- peared in all Russian markets especially in Novorossiys and Vladivostok, not to mention Central Russia, and are offering in large quantities goods of German manufacture upon the normal conditions of peace-time credit and the pre-war basis of trade exchange. > 4. In the Far East a similar position is taken by Japan. The conclusion is that the United States is losing Rus- sian markets now and for all time, despite the particular efforts of the Russian Cooperatives in the United States to reorganize permanent commercial intercourse between the two countries. The Russian Cooperatives themselves are now faced with the necessity of approaching hereto- fore boycotted German firms and agents and of taking active steps toward resuming such commercial relations with Germany as would make it possible to obtain and transport into Russia supplies of goods, machinery and manufactures of which the Russian population is in such dire need. Is it not time for America now, before all is lost, to change her tactics? Whose interest is she ad- vancing—Russia's? No. Her own? Gregory Zilboorg. igig 20I THE DIAL A Ransom for Russia's Jews r or some time there have been rumors to the effect* that the Kolchak agents in this country, hav- ing failed to secure satisfactory financial backing for the Omsk Government, have begun to work upon the racial apprehensions of American Jewry. They hoped thus to frighten certain philanthropic Jews into financing Kolchak on the theory that by helping establish a government "friendly" to the Russian Jews they would eliminate the danger of further pogroms. The correspondence printed below proves that this campaign of misrepresentation is actually in progress. The duplicity of Kolchak's representatives is revealed by their use of Metro- politan Platon to allay the doubts which arose in Mr. Schiff's mind that all was not as represented. The effrontery of .these agents in calling upon Met- ropolitan Platon appears when it is remembered that instead of the benign individual they represent him to be, the Metropolitan's Russian record shows that he is a personality of the old regime closely identified with the dark forces of the Czar's govern- ment, a member of the pogrom faction in the Duma, a leader of pogromist Black Hundreds, and an active anti-Semite! July 7, 1919. Dear Mr. Sack: Reliable reports we got from Siberia state that condi- tions, in the territory under the sway of the Omsk Gov<- eminent, are most unsatisfactory—to use a mild expression —as far as the Jews are concerned. I have myself seen photographic reproductions of circular letters issued by a committee which signs itself in the name of the Czar and the Restoration of Autocracy, inciting the populace into atrocities against the Jewish population, against whom, it is stated, all kinds of cruelties—even murder—are practiced, without the least interference, if any [thing] with the connivance of the authorities. As you represent the Omsk Government faction and strong propaganda is being made by the Bureau under your charge for Admiral Kolchak's cause, I deem it my duty to write you in respect to the information that has been imparted to me and which is beginning to arouse American Jewry. Trusting that you can see your way to do something ef- fectual in transmitting a word of warning to your friends in Siberia, whom you represent, against measures which are sure to alienate the sympathy of the American people, I am, with kind regards, Yours faithfully, (Signed) Jacob H. Schiff. Evidently the Russian Information Bureau was not abashed by this letter, but attempted rather to "convert" the American Jewish leader. Here is' a letter that testifies to the character of this attempt: July 11, 1919. Dear Mr. Sack: Acknowledging receipt of your two letters, in reply to my own of the 7th inst, I am extremely appreciative that you have gone to the trouble of making so exhaustive an answer, which I have read attentively. I can well comprehend that the entire situation, which you set forth so clearly in your letter, is not only most difficult, but also very delicate and that judgment upon reports that come from Siberia and Russia should not be hasty. We have already discussed here whether it would not be well to send to Siberia a reliable independent investi- gator, but we have already two men there—Dr. Rosenblatt at Vladivostok, who represents the Joint Distribution Committee, and Mr. Samuel Mason at Yokohama, who represents there the Jewish Immigrant Aid Society. Mr. Mason has variously been in Siberia; he is absolutely reli- able and from both these representatives we have informa- tion that the Jewish conditions are not as they should be, even under the present critical situation in the districts under the swa"y of the Omsk Government. Mr. Louis Marshall, President of the American Jewish Committee—whom you know—and Dr. Cyrus Adler, Chairman of its Executive Committee, who have been in attendance at the Peace Conference in Paris, have com- pleted their very satisfactory work there and are expected home in about two weeks. We deem it well to await the return of these two gentlemen, in order to confer with them and get their wise counsel as concerns the Siberian situation and to decide whether, as you have been good enough to suggest, it would be best to send another in- vestigator. We know you are at all times ready to give us your valuable support and advice and upon this we shall rely to a great extent. Thanking you again for the explicitness with which you have written me, I am, with kind assurances, Faithfully yours, (Signed) Jacob H. Schiff. Doubtful of the success of his early attempts to convert Mr. Schiff, the Director of the Russian Information Bureau now used his last tool, the Metropolitan Platon, Archbishop of Kherson and Odessa, ancient servitor of the Czar. On July 21 the Director appeared in the character of secret agent of the Russian Embassy and chief promoter of Platon. July 21, 1919. Jacob H. Schiff, Esq., Kuhn, Loeb & Co., Pine and William Streets, New York City. Dear Mr. Schiff: Thank you for your kind letter of the 18th inst. with a copy of the letter from the City Editor of the New York- Call enclosed. I return this letter herewith. We have done our best that the statement by Metro- politan Platon, correcting what the papers have presented as his original statement, should be printed as fully and widely as possible. I enclose herewith copies of the statement as printed in the New York Times and in the New York Herald. In addition to all the New York papers, published in English, copies of the statement were also sent to the Jewish Daily News, the Jewish Morning Journal, the Jewish Daily Forwarts and the Jewish Daily Day. Mr. Oscar S. Strauss and myself have just visited Metropolitan Platon, who was deeply touched by Mr. Strauss's visit. We have spent there about an hour and a half, and Mr. Strauss told me that he was delighted by Metropolitan Platon and the views he expressed during the conversation. 202 September 6 THE DIAL The Joint Distribution Committee was kind enough to send me their correspondence with Dr. Rosenblatt, which I went through carefully. Significant among these docu- ments is Dr. Rosenblatt's cable of May 7th, which as you probably recall, reads: "No. 4. Imminent danger. Pogroms Ekaterinbourg, Omsk, Tomsk, Isabel and other places. Officials openly foster anti-Semitic agitation. Claims of Jewish Bolshe- vism and profiteering used as a deadly weapon. Frequent posters 'Kill Jews.' Situation critical. Take prompt action through Washington." As you probably recall, Mr. Frank L. Polk added to this cable: "I have already warned the Omsk Government to be on the lookout for any movement of this kind. Personally I think their fears are unfounded." I think that Mr. Polk was right. The danger which Dr. Rosenblatt called "imminent," fortunately did not result in anything deplorable. As Dr. Rosenblatt himself wrote in a letter, dated May 22nd: "The new settlers, who compose probably nine-tenths of the Jewish population in the Far East and about ninety-five per cent in Siberia proper, are afraid of their own shadows and talk in whispers. Exaggerated, fan- tastic and even absurd stories from town to town; or- dinary robberies are reported as singled out instances in a well-organized plan of action designated for the ex- termination of all Jews." I fully agree with Dr. Rosenblatt's further notice, in the same letter, that "all this is merely symptomatic of the real danger in which the Jews are compelled to live." I spent on Friday several hours with Mr. J. C. Okou- litch, a High Commissioner of the Omsk Government, just arrived in this country. Mr. Okoulitch confirmed that the reactionary elements in Siberia are active in their anti-Semitic propaganda, and stated that if not for the Government, terrible Jewish massacres would have hap- pened in Siberia months ago. The Government is firm in its policy of protecting the Jewish population, and if it was incapable until now to stop all the signs of the anti- Semitic propaganda, this is because the Government is still not stable enough. In conclusion I would sum up the situation as follows: Four possibilities are open for Siberia and for Russia in general: a government temporarily led by Admiral Kol- chak; a Bolshevist government; a reactionary govern- ment, definitely turning to the restoration of the Czar's regime; and an absence of any government. Out of these possibilities, a great part of Russia's democrats prefers the Government led by Admiral Kolchak. At the same time they greet the organization of support of Admiral Kolchak's Government from abroad under guarantees that he executed the democratic program which he pro- claimed more than once in the most solemn way. Very sincerely yours, (Signed) A. Sack. Thus, without any facts and without facing the situation honestly, the Platon-Kolchak representa- tive "believed" with Mr. Polk that the fears of the American Jewry were " unfounded." The fact is that Messrs. Polk, Sack, and Platon do not want to know the truth or to let it be known. Their irame is to frighten the Jewry by playing on their racial apprehensions. In the following letter to his chief, the Director of the Information Bureau reports how he successfully decoyed four Jewish leaders into the sanctum of Metropolitan Platon, the old Black Hundred pogromist: (Translation from the Russian) July 29, 1919. Michail Michailovich Karpovich, Russian Embassy, Washington, D. C. Dear Michail Michailovich: I want to let you know the details of the visit paid yesterday by the Jewish Delegation to Metropolitan Pla- ton. These details may prove of interest to Boris Alex- androvich [Bakhmietiev, the "Russian Ambassador"] and you. The delegation was composed of Jacob Schiff, Oscar Strauss, Louis Marshall and Rabbi Wise. The Metro- politan appeared to have been very much pleased by the visit, and received the guests in a very sincere and friendly manner. The conversation began with a pretty detailed state- ment by the Metropolitan on the condition in Russia and the necessity, from the point of view of the Russian State interests and the interests of the Jewry, of helping act- ively the Government of Admiral Kolchak. Afterwards all the members of the delegation spoke in turn, beginning with Mr. Schiff. 'I was present and was glad to help the Metropolitan and the gentlemen by- translating their speeches. All the members of the dele- gation first assured the Metropolitan Platon that they are strongly opposed to Bolshevism. They stated that the great majority of the Jewry in the United States were, like the majority of the Jews in Russia, fighting against Bolshevism. Rabbi Wise said that the policy of tolerance toward* the Bolshevists was upheld by the Christian advisers of President Wilson. As an example, he mentioned the resignation of the five members of the American Peace Delegation, who protested against the partial recognition of Admiral Kolchak. All these people, with Mr. Bull:; at the head, are Christians. On the other hand, the American Jewry is entirely in sympathy with the idea of the restoration of a United Democratic Russia and are glad to help the Russian people as much as they can. Marshall stated that in a few days there would be called a meeting of thirty-five or forty of the most impor- tant representatives of the American Jewry, and that a report of the Jewish delegates at Paris would be pre- sented there. A resolution on the Russian question is also to be passed. This resolution will be sent to Metropolitan Platon as an expression of the state of mind of the American Jewry concerning Russia. The visit closed very satisfactorily and both sides were apparently very well satisfied. The statement of the Jew- ish Delegation was so sincerely friendly that it remains for us to follow hot-foot in order as far as possible to create from this state of mind something concrete for Russia. With sincere regards, Shaking your hand,