- ance, with school mortality, with illiteracy, with legislation upon building construction, with free text books, and with medical inspection, in order to reach the final showing, which judges each state by the ten most important tests of effi- ciency, and gives to each a general rank in accordance with the way in which it meets these tests, besides giving in separate columns its rank under each separate test. Taking as an example our own state of Illinois, we find that while its 1913] 88 THE DIAL general ranking is eight, its special ranking is as follows: Children in school . . . 14 7 Expense per child . . . . 8 School days per child . . . 8 Length of school year . . . 15 11 Expenditure and wealth . . . 28 13 20 . 11 It obviously behooves us as a commonwealth to spend upon education something like twice what we now spend, which would give us third place in the scale, to do much more than we now do for high schools, to lengthen the school year in the rural districts (for it is they that now bring it down to 171 days), and to get more of our children into school. These are the reforms that are ear-marked for us by the pamphlet, and, effectively made, would enable us to feel fairly proud of our state. Of course, as a counsel of perfection, each state of the forty- «ight should wish to get into the first place, but as this is obviously impossible, should aim to outdistance as many of the others as possible. "The object of this booklet," we are pithily informed, "is to make the indifferent different." It can hardly fail of this effect upon the mind of anyone who gives it an intelligent examina- tion. A LITERABY PEACE MOVEMENT. At a banquet recently held in Paris, when the spectre of a European war had barely been ban- ished, a German speaker proudly asserted that Maupassant was as familiar to German readers as any native modern writer; and a French speaker pointed with pride to the familiarity of French literati with the works of Sudermann and others,— adding, with a shaft of sarcasm directed at his own people, that even the "Faust" of Goethe, long a favorite through the opera of Gounod, was being prepared for production by M. Antoine! There was enough, however, in the addresses of the evening that called to mind some remarks of Romain Holland, who perhaps knows his French and knows the Germans as well as any Frenchman or German living: "We must not indulge in illusions. We are at present more ignorant of the world than the men of the past. Translations of a few foreign novels and a rapid survey of the papers do not suffice to make one penetrate the genius of another people. They only relieve us too easily of any personal effort at knowing them first hand, they favor ignorance, vanity and laziness. Compare with that shabby curiosity the eagerness of mind and the untiring labor of a Voltaire, a Diderot, an Abbe Pr4vost and their friends, not to mention Leibnitz or Goethe." There is little doubt that, notwithstanding the greater facilities of travel, the rapid interchange of news through the press and the telegraph, and other features of modern international intercourse, famil- iarity and sympathy with the intellectual achieve- ments of the neighbors across the Rhine were greater in the period of the Huguenot immigration into Germany, of the royal Francophile Frederick the Great, and of the French encyclopedists, than it is now. If, however, the Germans seem more familiar with French letters than the French with German literature, it is well to remember that the Huguenot element was so thoroughly assimilated in the Ger- man people that its influence lingers in many a German town, and in a part of Berlin which they had called Moabit, where French is to this day the dominant language in a college likewise dating from that period. But the violent reaction against any- thing French which succeeded the Napoleonic inva- sion of a century ago seems no less justified than the indifference of the French to-day towards German literature of the decades following upon the war of 1870-1. For the patriotism of a people is ever at the beck and call of the powers who need the backing of the mass for the realization of their plans, and the chauvinism of a nation is rooted in ignorance and nurtured by misguided patriotism. Yet the tide of intellectual sympathies does not always swell and subside with the tide of political developments. Said Ludwig Borne in " Die Wage" in the year 1836: "The political history of a people is the biography of its egotism, but the literature is the history of its humanitarian life, for it does not stop before legal barriers, or geological frontiers, but leaps across laws, customs, antipathies, and prejudices." Thus in the wake of the post-Napoleonic Franco- phobia in Germany had come the romantic school, with its revival of a cosmopolitan culture which had distinguished the writers of the past. In France, Gerard de Nerval had translated "Faust," and had published an anthology of German verse embracing selections from Goethe, Schiller, Bttrger, Uhland, Kttrner, Jean Paul, and Heine. Heine himself had made Paris his home, and wrote for German maga- zines on French letters, music, and art, and for French reviews on German philosophy and litera- ture. In the course of the century many other less known writers served as mutual literary interpreters between the two politically hostile nations. Rudolf Lindau, the gifted though less popular brother of Paul Lindau, wrote in French and German. The polylingual feuilletonist, A. Mels, who died in Chi- cago a year after the Columbian Exposition, which he attended as foreign correspondent, had when a resident of Paris in his prime written for German, French, English, and Spanish papers. With the Franco-German war came a brief reac- tion against this literary internationalism in both countries. But the generation of Germans that grew 84 [Feb. 1, THE DIAL up after the glamor of military glory had faded again sought in France the source of much of its inspira- tion, and trained its literary talents upon the models of French masters, foremost among them Zola. Nor was the younger generation in France slow at recog- nizing the one great personality that rose above the horizon of the new German empire—Nietzsche, who with the penetrating searchlight of his genius covered the world's culture, past and present, and found it ''all too human." Through him was revealed to independent French thinkers the intellectual re- valuation that had begun in Germany, when the glit- ter of the wealth acquired by the war had vanished and symptoms of intellectual stagnation and moral decadence had begun to appear. Nietzsche intro- duced the young Germans to the philosophy of Gobineau and to the subtle art of Stendhal-Beyle. He was an admirable mediator between Teuton and Gaul, and a light-bearer to both. But while the French intellectuals studied Nietz- sche's philosophy, the literature which followed in the wake of his iconoclasm remained practically un- known in France. Of that young Germany which gives such striking proofs of his far-reaching influ- ence, and of the lessons learned from Ibsen, Tolstoi, and Zola, only Gerhart Hauptmann has reached a French audience eager to know something of the forces at work in the literature of the so-called arch- enemy across the Rhine. Even of the extent of German interest in French letters, of the amazing number of German editions of French authors, the French themselves are supremely ignorant. For chauvinist currents are strong in the intellectual world of France. Even the faculty of German let- ters at the Sorbonne was made to feel these influ- ences a few years ago, when Professor Andler and a number of his students, returning from a journey to Germany undertaken for purposes of study, were made the butt of hostile demonstrations on the part of the "nationalist" students backed by Maurice Barres. Thus there is decided room for a propaganda of better mutual understanding, such as was inaugu- rated not quite a year ago and culminated in the banquet referred to at the beginning of this article. There was truth in the remark of one of the speakers that even though the achievements of the two nations were known and appreciated by a small minority on both sides of the Rhine, there was need of having the men and women behind those works meet face to face and found upon the basis of social relations the work of mutual understanding. That is one of the most practical aims in the programme of the society "Pour Mieux Se Connaitre," and of the most direct appeal. The number of Germans residing in Paris has been estimated at six thousand. A large percentage consists of members of various intellect- ual professions,—teachers, students, artists, writers, whose opportunities for direct personal contact with their French colleagues are limited. There is the Alsatian element, whose position whether on this or the other side of the Rhine is surely not enviable. The very existence of these people is at all too fre- quent intervals menaced by the war-clouds that keep looming up on the political horizon of the two coun- tries. The mission of the society is of vast import- ance, and its possibilities are equally vast. For the French senator, Baron d'Estonrnelles de Constant, who said, "Le rapprochement franco-allemand est la condition de la paix du monde," has given voice to a sentiment the truth whereof can scarcely be doubted. Nor can this mutual approach be more successfully attained than by an inofficial intercourse between representatives of both nations and by the intellectual exchange which mutual familiarity with their science, art, and letters insures. For, after all, the world of intellect is neutral ground, and if repre- sentatives of both nations can meet at international congresses of science for the exchange of experiences, and by striving in common for the promotion of knowledge forget the barriers that separate them in the political arena, there is no reason why men and women in the world of art and letters should not meet for the purpose of personal acquaintance and a more intimate understanding of the foreign mind, and by mitigating the spirit of mutual distrust pro- mote the possibility of peace. The membership of the society bids fair to repre- sent that intellectual world which should know no national boundaries. Among its French members one notes Octave Mirbeau, Leon Frapie-, Jean Rei- brach, Victor Margue'ritte, J. H. Rosny aine\ Re'ne' Ghil, Leon Bazalgette, Henri Guilbeaux, Gabriel Faure", Claude Debussy, Charles Leandre, Paul Signac, Leopold Mabilleau, Charles Wagner, Jean Richard Bloch, Paul Hyacinthe Loyson, and our ex- patriate Francois Vie'le'-Griffin. The president is- M. J. Grand-Carteret, a writer on problems of inter- national politics, such as the Alsatian and Moroccan questions, who is equally well-known in Germany as in France. The secretaries are Loyson, the son of the famous Pere Hyacinthe, who made his debut as dramatist some years ago and is now editing a mag- azine, and Guilbeaux, a Belgian by birth, and a poet and critic of rare ability, who writes on German letters for French and on French letters for Ger- man reviews. The list of German members shows the names of Ernst Haeckel, Wilhelm Ostwald, Karl Federn, Karl Lamprecht, KrCch Schmidt, Richard Dehmel, Ludwig Fulda, Clara Viebig, Carl and Gerhart Hauptmann, Karl Henckell, Felix Wein- gartner, Richard Strauss, Max Liebermann, Franz von Stuck, and others. There is an international committee to which belong, among others, Maeter- linck, Verhaeren, Edouard Claparede, A. Forel, the Baron ess von Suttner, E. Jacques-Dalcroze, and Miss Anna B. Eckstein of the International Peace Society. The propaganda of this movement for an intellec- tual Franco-German "rapprochement" includes the arrangement of exhibitions of French art and con- certs of French music in Germany, the organization of travel-clubs in France for the purpose of visiting Germany, and the introduction into France of the 1913] 85 THE DIAL works of modern German writers—chiefly those who have shown unusual familiarity with French history or a profound understanding of the French tempera- ment. Among the works of this kind to be presented in France is the monumental double drama by Carl Hauptmann, "Burger Bonaparte — Kaiser Napo- leon." A review called "Cahiers Franco-Allemands" is the temporary organ of the society; but a large review, taking its name from the one dreamed of by Heine, "France-Allemagne," is to be founded, and will be devoted to the discussion of Franco-German problems and to the exchange between French and German letters. This propaganda of ideas, supple- mented by banquets and other social reunions, is likely to bring about relations between the French and the German members which will deliver both from the burden of preconceived notions and enlarge their vision towards an appreciative understanding of the spirit of the people whom the political machi- nations of the powers would make their enemy. The influence radiating from such a nucleus of unbiased minds seems one of the most promising factors in the propaganda for a permanent peace between the French and the Germans, whom Victor Hugo called "les deux nations maitresses" and whose perpetual misunderstandings disturb the whole world. A. VON Ende. CASUAL COMMENT. The lure of the novel loses nothing of its strength with the progress of the suns and the enormous increase in the number of novels. But it is encouraging to note at the same time an occa- sional sign of the increasing attractiveness of other departments of literature. In the city of Wash- ington, for instance, the people are learning, not to like fiction less, but to like history and science more. In the current yearly report of the Public Library of the District of Columbia, Mr. Bowerman, the librarian, records with satisfaction a nearly station- ary condition in the number of story-books circu- lated in recent years, with a marked increase in the circulation of more serious reading matter. In brief, the fiction figures for the last eight years show a relative shrinkage amounting to twenty-six per cent in the total circulation of to-day; that is, from a fiction circulation of eighty-four per cent in 1904, there has been a gradual fall to fifty-eight per cent last year. Without reference to a possible change in readers' tastes, the factors supposed to have produced this encouraging result are the per- sonal help and guidance given by assistants, pro- gressive extension of the open-shelf system, and special displays of works on various subjects in a case labelled " Some Readable Books " and holding about two hundred and twenty-five volumes, which need frequent replenishing. The library's plan of compiling its occasional press notices into a monthly bulletin, and of cooperating with other institutions or associations in the preparation of bibliographic aids, calls for commendation. • • • A cheerful fessimist, facing unabashed the world's proneness to evil, and having always as a final resource the courage of despair, is a more inspiring personage than the fatuously smiling op- timist, reiterating his optimism with the unconvinc- ing emphasis of him who protests too much. Mr. Alfred Russel Wallace, who has just completed his ninetieth year, declares with the Preacher: "I have seen all the works that are done under the sun; and, behold, all is vanity and vexation of spirit." Im- mense industrial and scientific progress has been witnessed by this eminent man of science, but he is reported as denying that man has advanced in morals or intellect in the last seven thousand years. "Everything is as bad as it can possibly be. From top to bottom our whole social system is rotten, full of vice and everything that is bad." Yet the outlook ahead seems to him hopeful, perhaps because of what the new science of eugenics, in which he is said to have great faith, is expected to accomplish. And to hasten the coming of the good time he has in pre- paration a work of which he says that it is "a book suggesting the necessary work for the labor party in its campaign against poverty, and laying down what I believe to be the fundamental principles and means by which continuous progress in the well-being of the community can be secured." Meanwhile, as a sort of counterpoise (however light) to the weight of this eminent thinker's utterances, the jocular Mr. Chesterton is declaring himself in the press a staunch unbeliever in the good things promised by the eugen- ists, and he has a new book about to be issued on "The Evil of Eugenics." But he will have abund- ant time and possibly sufficient cause to change his mind before he is ninety years old. Postal legislation fob the discouragement of education now stands on the statute-book, and should receive early revision. By the terms of the new parcel-post law, potatoes and turnips and other produce may be mailed for local delivery at five cents for a single pound, or fifteen cents for eleven pounds, with corresponding rates between these weights; but a book weighing a pound must bear eight cents in stamps, and no book exceeding four pounds may be sent by mail. Packages of books aggregating eleven pounds in weight would call for at least eighty-eight cents' worth of stamps as com- pared with fifteen cents for the same weight of bricks or cabbages or shingle nails. A public library or a bookshop may not supply its near-by patrons with reading matter through the mail at a lesser rate than eight cents a pound, but the grocer or dry-goods dealer is allowed to fill the orders of his customers throughout a fifty-mile zone at a postal rate varying from five cents for a single pound to thirty-five cents for eleven pounds. When the old rate on merchan- dise other than printed matter was fixed at one cent an ounce, it was considered a handsome concession 86 [Feb. 1, THE DIAL to the cause of education and of literature to allow books to go by mail at one-half that rate. But now the general merchandise rate for short distances has been diminished about eighty per cent, while the book-rate remains as before. That this unfair dis- crimination may soon be corrected is the prayer of all who handle books or are interested in the spread of literature and learning. The passing of the period, in sentence construc- tion, such as our ancestors knew it, is not cause for unmixed satisfaction. An impatience that cannot tolerate a period of more than twenty words, or of more than two clauses, is not an impatience to be humored. The present mode of cutting up one's written discourse into snippets, or verbless interjec- tions, makes in reality hard reading and produces an unsightly page. In a recent piece of writing by an author of repute occurs one sentence of only ten words with three full-stops, two of which might much better have been commas. The mail has just brought to us an anonymous communication in the form of a copy of our sentence beginning at the bottom of the first column of page 40 of our last issue, with a parenthesized exclamation-point added, presumably in protest at the length of the sentence. Yet it con- tains only forty-five words. We have this moment, at the very first page turned up in opening Ruskin, chanced on a sentence of one hundred and seven words — which is short for Ruskin. (The sentence is the second in the third chapter of "The Seven Lamps of Architecture.") It is true our own sen- tence contains a double involution, a relative clause within a relative clause; but who with any head at all on his shoulders need get lost in so unintricate a maze? After ten minutes' reading of Macaulay or Gibbon the offending passage might almost strike one as curt. Scott and Dickens and Thackeray, not to mention Meredith and Mr. Henry James, do not hesitate to pack into a single sentence all that it can comfortably carry. But those of us who cannot stand the strain of sentences more than ten words long can always go back to our primer and enjoy the brevity and lucidity of its style. "See the cat. The cat has caught a mouse. The cat will eat the mouse. Poor mouse I" ... Fiction as a pleasant poison has withstood unnumbered attacks of the anti-Hedonists, and will withstand unnumbered more. Canon Barry, writ- ing in "Everyman," is the latest bitter foe to the novel; and Temple Scott, in the Boston "Transcript," rushes valiantly to its defense. "The tyranny of the novel," avers the churchman, "betokens that faith has given way to feeling, and that feeling is debauched by excitement following on the loss of long-cherished ideals." "We cannot be so bad as the Canon pictures us," is the reply, "or he would not take this trouble to make us see the error of our ways. There must be a sense for the right in us if he expects us to respond to his appeal." Of course the whole discussion will only leave each side more firmly fixed in its opinion than before. Instead of wasting so much good printer's ink in obvious gen- eralities the contestants might wisely have come to a short and simple agreement to the proposition that there are novels and novels, the best of them good for the head and good for the heart, the worst too worthless to claim an intelligent person's attention, and the middling ones regrettably numerous and by no means tonic in their action on the reader, but less injurious than many forms of diversion or sensation- alism that lure those who know not the pleasures of reading. . . . The incineration of "Tom Jones," which was solemnly performed the other day at Doncaster by order of the committee of the Doncaster Free Li- brary, will happily not deprive the rest of the world of the privilege of reading that masterpiece in early British fiction. It seems that one of the worthy Yorkshire men composing the committee or govern- ing body of the above-named library chanced to take the book home, having never read it before, and was scandalized at certain characteristics of the author's style. He reported the story an immoral work and thus precipitated a heated debate in the committee room, where, though one member staunchly stood up for the book as being superior to history as a faithful picture of Fielding's times, the prevailing sentiment was adverse to its retention on the shelves of the Doncaster library; and so it was sentenced to death by fire, and met its cruel fate with the true martyr's noble fortitude. But, as hinted above, there are other copies of the famous work known to be still extant, and for the next few weeks booksellers and delivery-desk attendants are likely to note an in- crease, slight but nevertheless perceptible, in the demand for the book, because of the action of the Doncaster Corporation Free Library Committee. Thus it is that the cause of morality is advanced— as they imagine in Yorkshire. A new "game of authors" might take the form of preposterous proof that every writer's works were written by somebody else; that Wordsworth, for example, wrote Scott's novels, and that Lamb wrote Shelley's poems. The Baconians have led the way in this recreational exercise, and Mr. Chesterton hilariously follows suit in a late amusing contribu- tion to the "Illustrated London News." Under the heading "Who Wrote Bacon?" he proceeds to de- monstrate, in a manner calculated to convince those who have just indulged in "a heavy and Pickwickian Christmas dinner," that the author of Bacon's writ- ings was none other than Shakespeare. The histori- cal proofs are handled with masterly skill. After referring to the execution of Essex and Southamp- ton's imprisonment in the Tower, and to the friend- ship between Essex and Bacon and that between Southampton and Shakespeare, he concludes, with irrefutable logic: "Could anything in Baconian mud be clearer? Shakespeare in some state of penitence (or drink) told Southampton that he himself was 'Bacon.' Southampton was just about to warn his friend Essex against the impostor, when the impos- 1913] 87 THE DIAL. tor had the sense to strike first and kill the man who might know, and imprison the man who did know —and only fawn on him when his tongue was free. Is it not a connected story? Is it not a conceivable hypothesis? Why, no; it is a new Christmas game." B • • "Cumulative" bibliography, as devised and practiced by the H. W. Wilson Co. of Minneapolis, has its history related in an interesting illustrated pamphlet issued by the above-named publishing house. It was in 1889 that the first modest beginnings of the * present business took shape in a partnership between two students of the University of Minnesota who un- dertook (on a capital of one hundred dollars, partly borrowed) to deal in students'text-books and supplies. This firm, Morris & Wilson, lost its senior partner when he was graduated in 1892, and since then Mr. Wilson has been head of the house, which is now an incorporated company. Its cumulative-catalogue work dates from 1898, and includes the now well- known and, to library workers and book-dealers, almost indispensable "Cumulative Book Index," "United States Catalogue," and "Readers' Guide to Periodical Literature," with an increasing list of other bibliographic aids such as "Library Work" (now taken over by the "Library Journal"), "Book Review Digest," a series of handbooks for debaters, a fiction catalogue, and a catalogue of children's books. The now large business and large body of employees, with their "cafeteria" lunch-room, their annual Christmas tree and summer picnic, and their evident esprit de corps, make an impressive appearance as the outgrowth of that tentative student enterprise of two youths working their way through college. A MEMORIAL TABLET TO THE AUTHOR OF "THE Star-Spangled Banner" was unveiled, with ap- propriate ceremonies, January 11, in the Mt Vernon Place Methodist Episcopal Church, Baltimore, the site of the house in which Francis Scott Key died just seventy years earlier. The tablet was presented to the church by the Baltimore Chapter of the Daugh- ters of the American Revolution, and was afterward set in its permanent place on the corner of the build- ing, facing Charles Street. Mrs. Charles W. Bassett, honorary regen i of the chapter, conceived and largely brought to accomplishment this tribute to Key, and the Baltimore sculptor, Mr. Hans Schuler, designed the tablet, a medallion portrait set against a partly- furled flag, with appropriate inscriptions and orna- mentation. In her address Mrs. Bassett called attention to the little-remembered fact that the Maryland lawyer, poet, and gentleman to whom we owe our national anthem, as many call the poem, was also a prolific hymn-writer, having produced, among others, the hymn beginning, "Lord, with glowing heart I praise Thee." a • • A staunch defender of Shakespeark against the assaults of the Baconians died at his home in Boston on the thirteenth of January. Judge Charles Allen, formerly of the Massachusetts Supreme Court, but latterly a gentleman of leisure devoting himself to literature and authorship and travel, uttered his protest against the Baconian madness in a volume modestly entitled "Notes on the Bacon-Shakespeare Question," which was published in 1900 and won the warm commendation of Sir Henry Irving and others whose praise was worth having. Judge Allen, as an experienced jurist, naturally devoted himself espe- cially to a refutation of the charge that the Shake- spearean plays contain such evidences of legal learning as Shakespeare could not have possessed. This and other points in the controversy are ably, succinctly, and interestingly treated. The combined brevity and cogency of the argument are in marked contrast to the diff useness and inconclusiveness of the custom- ary Baconian contention. Judge Allen had attained the ripe age of eighty-five years and nine months (lacking four days) when he died. New books for old, if cried through the streets, might bring the crier not a few treasures almost as precious as Aladdin's wonderful lamp. A hasty and afterward much regretted exchange of this sort was not long ago made by Sir Herbert Maxwell, as report avers; and he is now cautioning others to learn a lesson from his experience. Desiring the latest edition of a standard work of reference, and feeling unwilling to pay out the thirty-five pounds demanded for it by the bookseller, he searched his library for sometbing to offer in exchange, and chanced upon a set of "The Sporting Magazine" complete (1793-1870), which he innocently offered for the reference work. The offer was accepted without delay. Not many weeks afterward he ex- perienced a sensation upon reading that a set of the periodical in question had just been sold at auction for nine hundred and fifty pounds. And now he is advising deliberation and care in the weeding out of old books from one's library. COMMUNICA TIONS. WHY THE DIERESIS AND HYPHEN TO INDICATE PRONUNCIATION? (To the Editor of The Dial.) Will you not add your Amen in a tilt against the habit of attempting to teach the pronunciation, or for- mation, of words by means of the dieresis and hyphen? Authors, editors, typesetters, proofreaders, and even general readers, will surely welcome the suggestion. Labor and worry will be spared all these classes, and a deal of expense to the community will be avoided. The dieresis and hyphen are almost the last of some five thousand symbols, contractions, or abbreviations of words, elisions of suffixes, etc., invented by the copyists of the middle ages to save labor and vellum. The palimpsest is an eloquent proof that the tax for vellum was severely felt. With the exception of a very few they suddenly disappeared when printing and paper were invented. In the French language a few were retained, but it is suggestive that often the modern French author does not write them in his copy, but leaves the typesetter to put them in according to old custom and rule. His 88 [Feb. 1, THE DIAL acute, grave, and circumflex accents indicate quality not emphasis, while we long ago gave up both attempts. The Germans still retain the umlaut, and we £he dier- esis, hyphen, and, half ashamed of it, the ligature. This last, one may note in passing, by hurry and shortening, degenerated long ago into the dieresis and hyphen. We English have grown to disuse the ligature except in the antique a and ce, rapidly now and at last passing into obsolescence. As to the dieresis, it is self-evident that printing is one art, pronunciation another, the two at best most awkwardly and ineffectively interrelated. The printed form of words inevitably drifts into fixedness and uni- formity, while pronunciation varies constantly in place and time. The labors of the mirthful bands of spelling reformers are in proof, — and still more, the failure of their labors. Take a multitude of our words such as cooperate, coincide, zoology, zoophilist, reenter, reinter, reiterate,—does the dieresis or hyphen in the least aid a person of intel- ligence and education to write or pronounce them cor- rectly? If so it is plain that the rule should be observed in a thousand words not now so marked. Many of these, moreover, cannot possibly be given the dieresis, for instance, coincide, ptomaine, reiterate, etc., because three dots would be required over one i. If, also, the rule is necessary in one class of words, it should be in others, such as react, to distinguish it from other words of similar spelling but pronounced as one syllable. Extra- ordinary is another example, and so on indefinitely. Do rational folk believe that cooperation needs the dieresis to avoid confusion with the idea of the cooper, his barrels, or his trade? A learned bookmaker once so contended. The linotype and other typesetting machines have recently revolutionized the typographer's business, and writers and proofreaders have already been tormented by the machines' omission of the dieresis — as well, also, in the output of a million typewriting machines— and, if dictionary slaves, they have been compelled to order the plaguey dots reinserted by hand. In oomycetes, oophorectomy, zoology, and scores more, are we in danger of pronouncing the first three or four letters as if they constituted one syllable? Gott beicahr! Lastly, why persist in the ludicrously unnecessary use of the hyphen to hold together parts of words which need not and should not be separated either a little or wholly? Proofreaders and editors often seem to think that anti, for example, demands the hyphen before it can be joined to toxin, while on the same page they will omit the Siamese-twin ligament in antipathy, antimony, antinomy, ahd so on. Q_ J,I_ (j_ Atlantic City, N. J., January 21,1913. ART IN THE MAGAZINES. (To the Editor of The Dial.) In the "Century" for January appears a colored picture named "The White Rose," after a painting by Henry Golden Dearth: one of a series representing mod- ern American art. I am assured on the best authority that this picture "is representative of one branch of the impressionist school," and that Mr. Dearth's work in this school "was considered last year the hit of the artistic season." So be it; but I do not know how to describe the effect it had on me by any word milder than disgusting. I felt quite upset for some hours. The feelings of a single individual, no expert in artistic mat- ters, are of little or no consequence in themselves; but if (it is impossible to be original, even in one's distastes!) they are representative of any large body of opinion, or especially of any fundamental truths, they may be worth taking into account. Even speaking objectively, we may venture to maintain that a lady whose mouth, nose, and eyes are all awry is contrary to good anatomical princi- ples, and take some stand on this point, though our hatred of her expression and our abomination for the lurid un- natural colors be dismissed as psychological curiosities. It is impossible for an English-speaking person who reads at all not to feel some sense of proprietorship in the "Century." It is one of our great Anglo-American institutions, quite as much as if it were a public building, — nay, more so, since a building cannot be on both sides of the Atlantic at once. It has published at different times many beautiful pictures, and to this extent has contributed to the general taste for good art. It there- fore follows that one who is convinced that this and other of our standard magazines are giving us some essentially bad, and therefore immoral, illustrations, has good cause to be alarmed. The particular picture now criticized would not be so distressing, were it not an extreme example of a general type. Our fiction, our drama, our presentation of life in all forms, suffers from the same disease. This is, perhaps, a desire to cheaply attract notice, a product of our modern commercialism. It is not true that all standards have been abandoned; on the contrary, the most offen- sive products exhibit a large amount of technical skill. This skill, however, is considered the chief thing, while good taste, based on fundamental morality, is forgotten, — or perhaps not forgotten because never thought of. This description must not be taken as literally applying to every case; it merely indicates a tendency, which in itself justifies the language used, but which, as a matter of fact, varies through all degrees in its intensity. Creatures of our age, we who condemn it can perhaps not wholly avoid its influence. If this point of view is in any degree sound, it is use- less to argue that these things are produced because the public demand them. Those who control in these mat- ters are in the same position as teachers, whose duty it is to bring before their classes whatever is good, wise, and true. No practical teacher doubts the fact that it is more than easy to degrade the tastes and morals of his young people,—he has seen it done in many a school. In the present state of education in this country, our adults are as children, the majority of them readily responding to degrading influences, while magazine literature also reaches the young. It has been suggested that we cannot successfully combat these tendencies. Whether we can do so depends on what we call success. There never will be a time when the struggle for good things can be abandoned, for lack, if you put it so, of windmills to tilt against. In a sense, all attempts at education are doomed to failure, but in another sense they are bound to succeed. I think it would be very interesting to know how "The White Rose," in the "Century," affected a num- ber of people. May I, with the Editor's permission, ask the readers of The Dial to send me postcards describing in a few words how the picture affected them when first seen? In addition, I should greatly like to hear what may be said in its favor by those who think well of it. Should I receive a number of communica- tions resulting from this request, I will prepare a sum- mary or abstract of them for The Dial. T. D. A. Cockerell. Boulder, Colo., January 20, 191S. 1913] 89 THE DIAL, The Conquest of the South Pole.* Captain Amundsen and his book on "The South Pole" make their appearance among us at the same time, and both are cordially wel- come. The man is of as much interest to us as his gallant exploit in the Antarctic regions, and his engrossing account of that exploit is both a faithful picture of the author himself and a modest but detailed representation of the diffi- culties and dangers faced and overcome by the explorer and his trusty band of followers. That within three years of Captain Peary's attainment of the northern extremity of the earth's axis its southern end would likewise be reached, was probably expected by few familiar with the history of Polar exploration and the considerable intervals commonly separating one step of marked advance from the next. And, indeed, there is a good deal of what some might call lucky accident, but others would more truly call intuition and genius, to explain the quick following of victory in the South upon the heels of success in the North. Captain Amundsen was in the very act of preparing for his five- year drifting voyage across the North Polar Sea, which he still purposes accomplishing, when the telegraph flashed the news of the North Pole's discovery (if the word "discovery" is permissible in this connection), and he at once altered his plans, but kept his own counsel in the matter, so that not until the good ship "Fram" had touched at and departed from Funchal on her supposed voyage around the Horn to Alaska did he explain to his company as a whole that his destination was at the antipodes of the one attributed to him. This occurred in the summer of 1910. Early in Jan- uary of the following year the vessel anchored in the Bay of Whales, and after a winter (our summer, of course) in camp at that point the polar party made its successful dash to ninety degrees south, and was back in camp on the twenty-fifth of January, 1912, the exact date set down beforehand in the leader's schedule. While every part of the programme may seem to the hasty reader to have been carried out with a happy concurrence of favoring cir- cumstances, and the final success may present *Thb South Polk. An Account of the Norwegian Antarctic Expedition in the "Fram," 1910-1912. By Roald Amundsen. Translated from the Norwegian by A. 6. Chater. In two volumes. With maps and illustrations. New York: Lee Keedick. itself somewhat in the light of a lucky accident— so little emphasis does the chronicler lay upon his far-sighted plans for the avoidance of un- toward conditions—a careful study of the nar- rative reveals indications of forethought and generalship, and of reliance upon the prompt- ings of something very like genius, that greatly heighten one's admiration for the ability and courage of the Norwegian explorer. It was con- trary to the apparent teachings of Sir Ernest Shackleton's experience for Captain Amundsen to make the Bay of Whales his landing point and the site of his winter quarters. The great southern barrier of ice was supposed to be afloat there, with extensive tracts of the bay's borders continually crumbling away and drifting sea- ward. But by entering this inlet the "Fram" would be able to land the explorers nearer their destination than would elsewhere be possible, the leader had studied the problem and chose to take the risks, and the result showed the soundness of his judgment. Again, both Captain Scott and Sir Ernest Shackleton had declared against Eskimo dogs and in favor of Manchu- rian ponies as a motive power for the sledges in Antarctic exploration. Indeed, a motor car was taken along in the Shackleton expedition, so little confidence was felt in the traditional method of polar sledging. But here, too, the Norwegian trusted to his instinct, or to instinct and judg- ment combined, and provided himself with a hundred picked Eskimo dogs from Greenland, though the possibility of transporting them, alive and in a condition for service, across the equator was derisively denied by the wiseacres. It is true that Captain Amundsen was not with- out some experience of Antarctic conditions; nevertheless he showed remarkable prevision on this occasion. In respect to the time allowed by him for the work in hand we read in the opening pages of his narrative: "I worked out the plan as here given, at my home on Bundel fjord, near Christiania, in September, 1909, and as it was laid, so it was carried out to the last detail. That my estimate of the time it would take was not so very far out is proved by the final sentence of the plan: 'Thus we shall be back from the Polar journey on January 25.' It was on January 25, 1912, that we came into Framheim after our successful jour- ney to the Pole." Another rather novel item in the equipment of this expedition — novel at least to readers of American and English accounts of polar exploration — was the supply of shi instead of snowshoes for travel over the great white plains in the high latitudes. The advantage of this form of foot-gear to the Norwegian, who is used 90 [Feb. 1, THE DIAL to it from boyhood, is apparent enough. Speed and a great extent of bearing surface on yielding snow, or on the thin crust bridging a crevasse, were thus secured. There were no leads or open channels of water to be feared on the final dash to the southward, as was the case in Captain Peary's strenuous race to the North Pole and back, with the ever-present danger of finding himself marooned on an ice-floe; but there were regions treacherously cut up by concealed chasms of unknown depth, over whose frail snow-bridges the Norwegian ski could carry a man much more swiftly and safely than the American snowshoe. What the expedition accomplished in addi- tion to the attainment of the South Pole should not fail to receive mention. While the leader with four companions made his dash for the goal, Lieutenant Prestrud and two others started on an eastward exploring journey to the little- known King Edward VII. Land which Captain Scott had discovered in 1902. A considerable section in the second volume of the book is devoted to Lieutenant Prestrud's narrative of this expedition and what it accomplished. Another section is given up to Captain Nilsen's account of what he and his shipmates achieved in the way of oceanographic research with the stout ship "Fram" during the long winter while the land party was reduced to com- parative inactivity at Framheim. The south Atlantic between Africa and South America was traversed and investigated, temperatures taken, specimens of the plankton collected, and much information added to the world's knowl- edge of that part of the ocean. Appended papers at the end of the book contain many details of meteorology, oceanography, and other matters interesting to the student. To return for a little to the more popularly pleasing sections of the work, one cannot but note the buoyant, high-spirited, adventurous tone of the narrative as a whole. There is more of frolic and fun in Captain Amundsen's pages than we are accustomed to in those of his north- polar rival, or colleague, Captain Peary — which is natural enough, in view of the Norwegian's comparative youth. The entire expedition assumes something of the complexion of a grand lark in such passages as the following, which takes up the story immediately after the ship's destination had been made known to all on board, upon her departure from Funchal: "It was pure enjoyment to come on deck the morning after leaving Madeira; there was an added note of friendliness in every man's 'Good-morning,' and a smile twinkled in the corner of every eye. The entirely new turn things had taken, and the sudden change to fresh fields for thought and imagination, acted as a beneficent stimulus to those who, the day before, had contemplated a trip round the Horn. I think what chiefly amused them was their failure to smell a rat before. 'How could I have been such an ass as not to think of it long ago?' said Beck, as he sent a nearly new quid into the sea. 'Of course, it was as plain as a pikestaff. Here we are with all these dogs, this fine "observation house," with its big kitchen-range and the shiny cloth on the table, and everything else. Any fool might have seen what it meant.' I consoled him with the remark that it is always easy to be wise after the event, and that I thought it very lucky no one had discovered our destination prematurely." Then followed a great amount of reading-up in Antarctic literature on the part of these newly-enlightened members of the party. The ship's library numbered three thousand vol- umes or more, and from Captain Cook to Cap- tain Scott the Antarctic voyagers were well represented. "I considered it an imperative necessity," says our author, "that every man should acquaint himself as far as possible with the work of previous expeditions; this was the only way of becoming in some measure familiar with the conditions in which we should have to work." Wintering within the Antarctic Circle, in cold immeasurable by ordinary thermometers, and in all but total darkness so far as sunlight is concerned, would not seem a very exhilarating experience; but the Norwegian party appears from the narrative to have taken it much in the spirit of a picnic, and to have found an abundance of both work and play ready to hand. Snow-tunnelling and cave-digging, to enlarge the available accommodations for the company of nine, occupied considerable time and energy; and there was a great amount of preparation of sledges and dog-tackle to fill in spare moments, not to mention the daily routine of housework and mending or alteration of garments, and other humble tasks. The snug quarters at Framheim, cheerfully lighted and comfortably heated with petroleum, became homelike to the occupants, and with unlimited seal steak and an abundance of other good provisions the chief of the party avowed that he never before had lived so well. But now let us turn to some of the perils and hardships attending the great work of the expedition. After the start for the Pole had been made with five men and four sledges, trouble was encountered with crevasses, which revealed themselves unexpectedly be- neath the snow. At one moment a sledge broke through and threatened to drag all its thirteen 1913] 91 THE DIAL dogs to destruction. But a rope and two pairs of strong arms saved the day while a cool- headed volunteer climbed down, with another rope around his body, to relieve the suspended sledge of its load, two of his comrades hauling up as he unlashed. "These two fellows moved about on the brink of the chasm with a coolness that I regarded at first with approving eyes. I admire courage and contempt for danger. But the length to which they carried it at last was too much of a good thing; they were simply playing hide-and-seek with Fate. Wisting's information from below — that the cornice they were standing on was only a few inches thick — did not seem to have the slightest effect on them; on the contrary, they seemed to stand all the more securely." A later passage gives an idea of the sufferings caused by the extreme cold and raging winds. When the mercury rose to zero, Fahrenheit, the hardy Norsemen called the temperature sultry and oppressive. We read, for example: "The warmth of the past few days seemed to have matured our frost-sores, and we presented an awful appearance. It was Wisting, Hanssen, and I who had suffered the worst damage in the last south-east blizzard; the left side of our faces was one mass of sore, bathed in matter and serum. We looked like the worst type of tramps and ruffians, and would probably not have been recognized by our nearest relations. These sores were a great trouble to us during the latter part of the journey. The slightest gust of wind produced a sensa- tion as if one's face were being cut backwards and for- wards with a blunt knife. They lasted a long time, too; I can remember Hanssen removing the last scab when we were coming into Hobart — three months later." In making this final dash, Captain Amund- sen adopted tactics quite different from Captain Peary's in his similar adventure at the North. The American had started with five detachments, sending back first one and then another until he with a single one of his company and four Eskimos were left to complete the perilous jour- ney. No tents were used, but igloos, or snow huts, were built at each stage. The Norwegian, on the other hand, pushed on with his original party, camped each night, or day, as the case may have been, under cover of a tent, celebrated (briefly) with his comrades the attainment of the Pole, and returned with no loss of life except the dogs killed and eaten on the way. The Pole was reached on the day planned long beforehand, December 14, 1911, and the return to Fram- heim, as already noted, was on schedule time. Captain Amundsen's book has a fulness and variety of interest, and is written in a bright, often amusing, style, that distinguish it among works of its kind. The translator, too, has done his part well. One would not suspect the book of being a translation, unless told before- hand. The many illustrations, maps, charts, and other subordinate features of the work help to make it the complete and satisfactory pro- duction it is found to be. The author's earlier account of his memorable Northwest-Passage voyage in the "Gjba" had aroused expectations of a noteworthy book as the literary fruit of this more difficult undertaking, and these expecta- tions have not been disappointed. Pekct F. Bicknell. The Bbillat-Savarin of the Drama.* When my attention was first attracted to Mr. Archer's new book, ostensibly dealing with the making of plays, I not unnaturally concluded that it would embody rules and precepts for the guidance of the beginner, the tyro, who wished to be given an adequate recipe for constructing a play. Perusal of the work itself quickly dis- pels any such notion. The title is at once allur- ing and deceptive. The discovery one speedily makes is that this is not, in reality, a book for the dramatic craftsman. Indeed, the author begins with the asseveration that there are no rules for the writing of plays, and even disclaims writing for the benefit of would-be playwrights. Confessedly, he writes for the "manypeople with moderately developed and cultivable faculty"; and modestly ventures the hope that "even the accomplished dramatist may take some interest in considering the reasons for things which he does, or does not do, by instinct." The reason for all this is not far to seek. Mr. Archer is a dramatic critic, concerned with plays not as a constructive craftsman, but as an analy- tical critic. It is inevitable that his treatment parallels the phase of his dominant interest. So we actually have, not a book on play-making, but an analysis of the made play. In a word, we have a book of definitions, of criteria, for analyzing plays. The real title of the book, I venture to suggest, might more fittingly be, "How to Write Good Dramatic Criticism." This is not, in any way, to minimize the value of the book, but simply to arrive at a just descrip- tion of its scope. At the same time, we shall find, on further examination, that in analyzing the structure of the drama, the author not only holds out sane standards for the observation of the dramatic critic, but often consciously, more often unconsciously, sets up warnings and pre- cepts for the instruction of the practicing crafts- * Play-Making. A Manual of Craftsmanship. By Will- iam Archer. Boston: Small, Maynard & Co. 92 [Feb. 1, THE DIAL, man. This latter is the rble in which Mr. Archer shows up to least advantage. Mr. Archer, ac- cording to his own admission, is lacking in the innate competency of the dramatic craftsman— which, to be sure, in no sense invalidates his conclusions as a critic of the drama. Also, if I remember aright, the bureau for the purpose of advising budding playwrights, which Mr. Archer opened in London, was short-lived. As given in the present book, Mr. Archer's advice is, for the most part, either too general or too self- contradictory to carry with it the momentum of constructive helpfulness. An excellent example of Mr. Archer's weakness in this department is found in the following inimitable specimen of innocuous shilly-shally: "It might in many cases be wiser to warn the aspir- ant to keep himself unspotted from the play-house. To send him there is to imperil, on the one hand, his originality of vision; on the other, his individuality of method. He may fall under the influence of some great master, and see life only through his eyes; or he may become so habituated to the current tricks of the thea- trical trade as to lose all sense of their conventionality and falsity, and And himself, in the end, better fitted to write what I have called a quack hand-book than a living play." Apparently, it is the idea that the young aspir- ant has no power of originality, no strength of individuality, which prompts Mr. Archer's fears. Such an intellectual invertebrate as Mr. Archer posits may perhaps not be worth while worrying over. He goes on, however, to hedge with too facile glibness: "It would be ridiculous, of course, to urge an aspirant positively to avoid the theatre; but the common advice to steep himself in it is beset with dangers." It may well be that Mr. Archer is thinking of Ibsen; for after a certain point in his career was reached, Ibsen absented himself deliberately from all contact with the playhouse. It must be clearly pointed out, however, as a fact of crucial signifi- cance, that Ibsen began his career with the most attentive and pertinacious study of all the actual details of the theatre, of production, representa- tion, the art of acting, in the playhouses of Eu- rope, as well as of Norway. It was only after he had acquired a mastery of the materials of his art, both by practice and by intensive study 'of the theatre itself, that he felt strong enough to assert and maintain his independence. It is just as well that Mr. Archer did not at- tempt to write a book of receipts for play-making. It is related of Bronson Howard that, on being asked to compile a book of rules for playwriting, he declined on the ground that he feared being tempted to follow them! Mr. Archer has done, rarely well, something that needed to be done for our particular generation: the narration, in easily understood terms, of the structural history of the play, as it has developed, biologically as it were, up to the present time. As Mr. Archer wisely says: "One thing is certain — namely, that if any part of the dramatist's art can be taught, it is only a comparatively mechanical and formal part—the art of structure." Per- haps Mr. Archer somewhat underestimates the relative importance of the art of structure. Pro- fessor Matthews takes the view that anything which may be learned can be taught; and if we carry this principle to its logical conclusion, the indispensable part of the art of playwriting, namely the art of structure, may be taught, since it undoubtedly can be and always must be learned. Dramatic genius—the faculty for situ- ation, the sense for character, the stereoscopic imagination—this is innate, and cannot be ini- tially imparted through any system of instruc- tion: it can only be strengthened and developed through exercise, furnished both by self-acquired knowledge of the conditions of dramatic repre- sentation and by practice in the making of plays. It will be recalled that Ibsen once violently ban- ished from his presence a young playwright who wished Ibsen to hear the reading of his latest play—because, forsooth, the nincompoop had no scenario! A study of the various drafts of Ibsen'8 plays, made at different stages in their evolution, reveals the truly remarkable way in which the structural broadening and deepening of the bases of a play forwarded the psychologi- cal purposes of the creator of character and the master of climax. Upon one occasion, Mr. Bernard Shaw was asked to define the precepts that govern the dramatist in his selection of themes and methods of treatment. In his reply to that question, which is too long to be quoted here in its en- tirety, he shamelessly confesses: "I find myself possessed of a theme in the following manner. I am pushed by a natural need to set to work to write down conversations that come into my head unaccountably. At first I hardly know the speakers and cannot find names for them. Then they become more and more familiar; and I learn their names. Finally I come to know them very well, and discover what it is they are driving at and why they have said and done the things I have been moved to set down." I am not to be deceived into thinking this just a piece of Shavian fooling; for I have often seen Mr. Shaw at work, in trains and elsewhere, doing just what he describes himself as doing. A 1913] 93 THE DIAL series of conversations by imaginary characters not even fully individualized is the natural start- ing point for the dramas of a playwriter who has invented the drama of dialectic and has the hardi- hood to label a play a " Conversation." A germ idea of general significance; usually arising out of an incident in real life, experienced or, as Ibsen phrased it, " actually lived through," fur- nished the starting point for the majority of Ibsen's greatest plays — such certainly is the evidence furnished by the volumes of his Nach- gelassene Schriften. Indeed, nothing so piques the fancy as the image of the master craftsman, whoever he be, spinning out the threads of his creative imagination and weaving the magic pat- terns of human life which shall enrapture mul- titudes in that palace of light and sound, the theatre. A profoundly interesting book on play- making yet remains to be written, embodying the true relation of the methods actually em- ployed by dramatists of rank in the writing of their plays. The significance of Mr. Archer's book—the feature which constitutes it a popular substitute for any work on the technique of the drama now available—rests in the fact that it is, for the most part, couched in simple and compre- hendable terms. It is a sort of Scotch Frey- tag, for the " man in the street." Dispensing with the horrible jargon of the academic student of the drama, Mr. Archer manages to put in all the essential facts in regard to structural detail, without expressing himself in "hifalutin" terms. We cannot blame him for coining the word "Peripety" (Greek, peripeteia) to indi- cate a complete reversal of fortune; and we are grateful for the skill and perspicuity which char- acterize his definitions and distinctions, notably the distinction between "character-drawing" and " psychology." Peculiarly clarifying are the chapters entitled respectively,"Foreshadowing, not Forestalling," and " The Obligatory Scene." Much profit may be derived from careful perusal of the chapter, "Curiosity and Interest." Mr. Shaw—and I am sure some incidents narrated to me by Madame Ibsen justify the implication in regard to Ibsen — once defined the drama, or at least the temperamental con- dition under which drama is created, as " sane hallucination." This, however, cannot serve to convey any working basis for an adequate de- finition of drama. The boldest of Mr. Archer's chapters is entitled "Dramatic and Undra- matic." Here he tilts squarely against those contemporary critics, with Brunetieire at their head, who see in drama a clash of contending wills. "The theatre in general," said Brune- tiere," is nothing but the place for the develop- ment of the human will, attacking the obstacles opposed to it by destiny, fortune, or circum- stances." And again, " Drama is a representa- tation of the will of man in conflict with the mysterious powers or natural forces which limit or belittle us; it is one of us thrown living upon the stage, there to struggle against fatality, against social law, against one of his fellow- mortals, against himself, if need be, against the ambitions, the interests, the prejudices, the folly, the malevolence of those who surround him." Mr. Archer boldly denies that struggle is the indispensable differentia of the dramatic form, basing his denial upon the difficulty of forcing many plays to conform to such confinement of definition. He prefers to discover the marrow of drama in crisis. Such a definition, interesting though it be as a critical tentative, is far less comprehensive, it appears on reflection, than the definition of Brunetiere. It may be said with equal justice that crisis is a defining character- istic of the short-story. In the short-story, all the lines converge to a predestined end or crisis. When that crisis is reached, the story is com- plete. Mr. Archer's differentia thus breaks down for the drama. On the other hand, some of the greatest short-stories in the world are in- dependent of any conflict of human wills, and so fall outside the definition of drama as posited by Brunetiere. A crisis is a turning-point in the progress of a series of events; and is as- suredly a concomitant attribute of drama, which is a series of events, physical or psychological, induced in general by a struggle of wills. In other words, Mr. Archer has made the rather trivial blunder of choosing for his differentiat- ing characteristic merely one phase, the culmi- nant phase, of that struggle which he maintains is not the quintessential attribute of drama! In recent years, there has been a sharp break, among the younger playwrights, away from the restrictions of the ancient standards. Mr. Granville Barker, whose "The Voysey Inheritance" reads like a novel of the mid- Victorian era, has proposed the drama of the future as one which "leaves Aristotle out." So far has this new movement of secession and revolt progressed that many dramatic critics of to- day, suffering from no obsession by Aristotelian definitions, have frankly recognized that the so- called "laws" of the drama are nothing more than integrated formulations of the prevailing practice of dramatists up to any given date in the drama's history. There is certainly some- 94 [Feb. 1, THE DIAL thing to startle a Matthews or a Walkley in Mr. Archer's statement: "The only really valid definition of the dramatic is: Any representa- tion of imaginary personages which is capable of interesting an average audience assembled in a theatre." How broad, how marvellously inclusive, is this iconoclastic definition! Un- fortunately, Mr. Archer has been guilty of another of those lapses in logic which betray him always in the hour of his sorest need. Clearly, such definition fails to correspond with Mr. Archer's former definition of drama as that art-form the essence of which is crisis. It is patent that there is an infinity of "representa- tions of imaginary personages which are capable of interesting an average audience assembled in a theatre" which yet may be lacking in any form of crisis, physical or psychological. Nu- merous modern plays do actually interest an average audience in a theatre, and yet, it must be confessed, betray an almost total deficiency in either struggle or, its culminant phase, crisis. The genre is found in playwrights so funda- mentally dissimilar, in outlook and method, as Maeterlinck and Shaw. To be specific, one might cite Gorky's " Nachtasyl," Barker's " The Madras House," Hauptmann's "Hannele," Shaw's Socratic Dialogue in Hades from " Man and Superman,"and Maeterlinck's "L'Intruse." Mr. Granville Barker has recently said in a public address which was subsequently printed, J4 A play is anything that can be made effective upon the stage of a theatre by human agency." This definition, which parallels Mr. Archer's in boldness and comprehensiveness of statement, is equally inadequate. For it throws into the class of the dramatic such a spectacle as a prize-fight. By the same token, Mr. Archer's definition per- mits the inclusion of so mechanical a perform- ance as a moving-picture show, since the films are made from photographs of the class which Mr. Archer labels "imaginary personages,"— namely, people playing parts in a coherent series of concocted events. The time is ripe for the critic who will bring clarity and convincing statement of the essen- tial meaning of the terms " drama" and " dra- matic" out of the present welter of confusion and chaos. If "dramatic " were accepted as a descriptive term for only a certain class of plays, and it were acknowledged once for all that there are other plays lacking in this specific character- istic which are nevertheless highly successful upon the stage, from both the artistic and box- office standpoints, a much-needed rebuke might thereby be given to the academic dogmatism which so unrelentingly endeavors to force the new art into the mould of antiquated conception. The dramatists of the contemporary era have constructively demonstrated one tremendously significant fact: that a play may be eminently successful in stage representation, judged by both artistic and commercial standards, and yet be intrinsically " undramatic." Archibald Henderson. The Great History of the Pilgrims.* Governor William Bradford's "History of Plymouth Plantation" has been described as "the chief book in our New England Old Tes- tament." It is the history of Plymouth Colony to 1647,—a noble record of exile, suffering, and triumph. These sturdy, God-fearing Pil- grims, after many vicissitudes, crossed the water to lay the sure foundations of state; and the human interest of their story, told in the living words of a leader, is second only to its historical importance. Although the "History" remained in manu- script for more than two hundred years, it con- stitutes the principal part of Nathaniel Morton's "New England's Memorial," first published in 1669, and was also used by later historians— notably Prince and Hutchinson. The precious manuscript was probably taken by an unknown person from the Old South Church in Boston during the Revolution, and was lost sight of for many years. It was thought by some to have shared the fate of other documents which were at that time carried away or destroyed. But a better destiny was in store for the "History," so carefully prepared by the second Governor of Plymouth Colony; for it was finally located, in 1855, in the Library of the Bishop of Lon- don at Fulham. Dr. Charles Deane caused the manuscript to be carefully copied, and under his able editorial direction it was first printed by the Massachusetts Historical Society in 1856, with an introduction and notes. The work, how- ever, was not very freely annotated,— through no fault of Dr. Deane, but rather in deference to the policy of the Society under whose auspices the book was given to the world. A facsimile of Bradford's beautiful manuscript—in marked contrast to the wellnigh indecipherable chirc- graphy of his contemporary, John Winthrop, Governor of the Colony of Massachusetts Bay •History of Plymouth Plantation, 1620-1647. By William Bradford. In two volumes. Illustrated. Boston: Published for the Massachusetts Historical Society by Houghton Mifflin Co. 1913] 95 THE DIAL — was published in 1896, with an introduction by Mr. J. A. Doyle, who for many years was an earnest and able student of our beginnings. In 1898, the year following the restoration of the manuscript by the ecclesiastical authorities of England, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts issued the "History" without notes, but with preliminary matter respecting the return of the document and addresses made upon that happy occasion. There was also published, in 1908, a reprint edited by the late William T. Davis of Plymouth, in the "Original Narratives of Early American History " series; unfortunately, however, Mr. Davis's notes do not adequately meet all requirements, to say nothing of im- portant omissions from the text. It therefore seems both fitting and wise that the present edition, in which the text is printed in full for the first time, should have been under- taken by the learned body that first gave Brad- ford in printed form to students of history; and wiser that the editing of these volumes was intrusted to the competent hand of Mr. Worth- ington C. Ford. Justin Winsor has said that, in later years, Mr. Deane was urged to recur to his work on Bradford's "History," and give a new edition "with all the amplitude of his eru- dition in commentary and note." While we cannot doubt Mr. Deane's great abilities and ripe knowledge of early New England history— for much admirable work stands to his credit,— he was perhaps, to a degree, disqualified for the undertaking by reason of certain mental char- acteristics which might have prevented him from seeing all things in their true perspective. How- ever this may be, one can hardly regret that the difficult task of preparing what possibly may be termed the final edition of Bradford was reserved for the present editor. Mr. Ford possesses the learning, the open mind, and the poise necessary to accomplish the best results; and if he did not link his name with any other historical work he would have earned, by his edition of Bradford alone, a permanent place amongst the foremost editors of American source books. An advisory committee of three was appointed by the Massachusetts Historical Society to aid Mr. Ford in his work, consisting of Messrs. Charles Francis Adams, Arthur Lord, and Gam- aliel Bradford, Jr.; and it is safe to assume that these gentlemen lent something more than their names to the undertaking. Of the three, Mr. Adams has had by far the widest experience as historian and editor, having edited with great scholarship two books of the period covered by Bradford's "History"—" Antinomianism in the Colony of Massachusetts Bay, 1636-1638" and Thomas Morton's "New English Canaan"—in addition to much other solid writing. Mr. Lord is an authority on Pilgrim history; and Mr. Bradford (of the ninth generation from the Gov- ernor), best known by his searching studies of Confederate leaders, must have taken keen and intelligent interest in the work. Mr. Adams, as long ago as 1883, expressed himself on the propriety of reproducing in print the pecul- iarities which abound in seventeenth-century manuscripts. Even then he had for years wished to see Bradford's "History" in "real seventeenth-century dress"; that is to say, as it would have come from the press of that day. This hope, however, has not been fully realized in the present edition, for it appears to have been thought best to follow Bradford's orthog- raphy, except in a few unimportant particulars. This will delight the historical scholar, and at the same time will not prove a hindrance to the general reader who has recourse to the volumes. Fortunately, Bradford's erratic and sometimes meaningless punctuation has not in all cases been preserved. The work is introduced by a brief "Note," signed by the Committee of Publication, in which it is truly stated that the story of the Pilgrim Fathers has been told in all necessary detail; nevertheless, some will regret that the editor did not see fit to go over the ground once more and trace in a consecutive manner the Pilgrim movement. Certainly this would not have formed a useless complement to the " History." It would be difficult to praise too highly Mr. Ford's rich and copious annotation. In this respect he has left nothing to be desired. His notes, written with admirable lucidity, have been prepared with thoroughness and much learning. He seems to have overlooked nothing of value or interest, and it will perhaps never be neces- sary to add much of importance to his labors. The edition contains more than two hundred finely-executed illustrations — many of them very rare, — consisting of maps, views, fac- similes of manuscripts, etc. The frontispiece of the second volume is a beautiful reproduction of a portrait of Edward Winslow, attributed to Robert Walker, from the original in Pilgrim Hall at Plymouth, the only authentic likeness extant of any of the Mayflower company. In no other book of Pilgrim history can there be found such wealth of illustrative material. This feature of the work is attractive and important. The index is excellent. These handsome quarto volumes will warm the book-lover's heart. They 96 [Feb. 1, THE DIAL are well made in every particular, and will rank with the best work of a press which has for many years been noted for the superiority of its product. This edition of Bradford's " History " should find its way into every public library of the land, where it will not only be available to the student and scholar, but also to him who in these days of stress and turmoil cares to pause long enough to give thought to the old rock from which we are hewn. It will not be out of place here to say that Mr. Ford is said to have edited, in the manner of the present reprint of Bradford, an edition (soon to appear) of Governor John Winthrop's "Journal." Winthrop heretofore has had only two editors worthy of the name,— Mr. James Savage, for many years the honored President of the Massachusetts Historical Society, and Dr. James K. Hosmer. Mr. Savage, however, though thoroughly steeped in the lore of his subject, was nevertheless far from being an ideal editor; but withal he was distinctly and racily individ- ual. Dr. Hosmer's work is excellent, but not full enough to make it the final word. The Massachusetts Historical Society is indeed for- tunate in being able to connect its name with two great books, which will be read for all time, or at least as long as there shall survive an interest in the beginnings of this nation. John Thomas Lee. Andrew :Lang'8 Laying of the Baconian Bogie.* Andrew Lang's book on the Baconian myth is his latest and we fear last service to litera- ture,— though so versatile and industrious a writer may well have left other surprises behind him. Never, perhaps, in his career has he ex- hibited more engagingly his special qualities, his literary passion, his loyalty, and his light and dexterous handling of really wide scholar- ship. His book ought to be the last word on the subject; but that, alas, is not to be hoped. The last word in this matter has been said before, —by Richard Grant White, by Mr. Dowden, and by others. This is one of those questions where reason and authority speak in vain; the realization of which fact leads to exasperation. Mr. Lang, for instance, begins in perfect tem- per, with courtesy and Christian charity; he ends somewhat in the state depicted by " Punch" * Shakespeare, Bacon, and the Great Unknown. By Andrew Lang. Illustrated. New York: Longmans, Green, & Co. in its study of " a gentleman disturbed by a blue bottle fly." What are you going to do with a theory that evades evidence, defies logic, and re- fuses to accept the credibilities of human nature? Against the Pyrrhonic attitude nothing can be proved. Archbishop Whately wrote " Historic Doubts about Napoleon Buonaparte." Suppose a case is tried where a witness for the defense swears that A is A; and the opposing counsel blandly remarks to the jury: "Yes, I know he says so, but what he really means is that A is B." Another person deposes that he believes white to be white, and the same counsel declares that it is perfectly clear that he harbors a mental reservation that white is black. Then a witness is examined who is qualified by long acquaint- ance, comradeship, and rivalry to speak of the defendant, and who does speak of him again and again, sometimes in criticism, sometimes in un- bounded eulogy. The lawyer for the plaintiff listens and then smilingly declares that all this is only " Fanny's way,"—that it is quite evident that the gentleman has his tongue in his cheek; that the very gruffness of his growling at and the ardor of his championship of one man, the per- fect applicability oi every fact he adduces to him and to no other, is proof positive that it is another whom he is referring to all the time. This is a fair statement of the attitude of the latest anti-Shakespeareans. The mind reels at such treatment of the verities. Argument is impossible. All the external evidence and practically all the internal probability in the case are on one side. The Baconian or anti- Shakespearean theory is nothing but a suspicion backed up by a sneer. Mr. Lang does not trouble to treat of the crop of cryptogrammic phantasies of the past. These the neo-Baconians have themselves rele- gated to the limbo of the forgotten. Nor does he go into the so-called parallelisms of phrase between Shakespeare and Bacon. Richard Grant White and Mr. Dowden have thoroughly dis- posed of these. He dismisses any resemblances of thought as being part of the property of the age—ideas in the air. It would not be difficult to make out a case for Charles Darwin's author- ship of "In Memoriam " and the early poems of Tennyson. As for basic philosophy, Shake- speare and Bacon are in antithesis. The one was an idealist and pessimist, the other an utili- tarian and optimist. Mr. Lang declines also to express an opinion as to Shakespeare's legal learning. He delivers him over to the lawyers, who, he says, agree as to the accuracy of Shake- speare's law allusions. Accurate they may be, 1913] 97 THE DIAL but they are drawn from a slender stock of knowledge. Shakespeare certainly did not know Littleton's " Institutes " or the earlier treatises of Bracton and Fleta. And these were the English law authorities of his day. When in 1616, the year of Shakespeare's death, Ben Jonson published his " Works," he was univer- sally laughed at and regarded as an intruder in literature. "The silence about Shakespeare,"—that is one of the pet superstitions of the Baconians. Mr. Lang has no trouble in showing that we know more about Shakespeare than about the majority of the authors of that age. Here and there a man like Ben Jonson, who had the modern advertising instinct, or one like Mar- lowe, who got himself into picturesque embroil- ments, made his personality felt; but in the main the Elizabethan literary group is a congregation of shadows. This is largely true of the men who were really considered poets in that day,— Spenser, Daniel, Drayton. Playwrights were but little regarded. But, as Mr. Lang says, "Impossible" is the banner word of the anti-Shakespeareans. It is "impossible" that one of Shakespeare's birth and bringing-up should have risen to such heights! Why? Probably a good third of the greatest men of all time have come up from beginnings more inauspicious than were those of Shakespeare. To name only three English writers who have something of parity with Shakespeare in their genius,—-Burns, Keats, and Dickens came from a lower social strata, and had comparatively less opportunity for edu- cation than Shakespeare. When someone asked the elder Dickens where his son had been edu- cated, he answered, "Why—ah, you may say, sir, that Charles educated himself." Latin was the only gate to learning in Shakespeare's time. There was a good Latin school at Stratford. Up to the time that Shakespeare was thirteen or fourteen his father was well-to-do—one of the leading men of the village. If his son did not attend the school, whose sons did? But learning is a good deal like vaccination — it may take or it may not. Or it is like the Scripture parable of the Sowing of the Seed, some of which fell on good ground and returned a hundred fold, and some of which fell on stony ground and did not come up at all. Granting the fertility of the ground, little seed might produce a great harvest. If Shakespeare was Shakespeare, it is hard to see what better preparation he could have had for the work he was to do. To spend his early years in rural England, in daily experience of those country scenes, customs, and characters which crowd his plays, and then at twenty-one or so to go up to the university of London life, with just enough schooling to appreciate and profit by the society into which he was thrown and the books by which he was surrounded,— does not this seem far more consonant with the throb and vividness of the world which the plays exhibit than an exclusively scholastic training? To seek for accurate and thorough scholarship in Shakespeare is, in Tennyson's phrase, "to milk a he-goat." Mr. Lang devotes a chapter to the First Folio. There are said to be twenty thousand palpable errors in this volume, besides a larger number of mere typographical slips. Bacon corrected his own works carefully enough. Did he who prized the "New Atlantis" and the "Apothegms" so highly, think the plays (assuming them for the moment to be his) unworthy of the slightest over-seeing? The Baconians assert that he hired Ben Jonson to attend to this; but Jonson was too good a workman to have had a hand in such a mess as the first folio. A new theory is that the plays are the work of "a Great Unknown," neither Shakespeare nor Bacon, who, indifferent to money or fame, unrevealed to actors or pub- lic, took the trouble to go through all the stages of a playwright's novitiate and practice, and in the end was so sublimely careless as to let his works be published in such a shocking way. Stat magni nominis umbra. In his chapter on "The Preoccupations of Bacon," Mr. Lang gives a view of the business of this man's life—a life so full and varied that James Spedding, who knew it best, said: "I think I am in a position to state that Lord Bacon did not write the plays." Mr. Lang refuses, however, to set any limits to the powers of gen- ius, whether in Shakespeare or Bacon. Genius, indeed, can do much. Bolivar in one of his cam- paigns captured a fleet of gunboats in a river by a charge of cavalry. If Bacon had stopped with his philosophical treatises, his essays, even his history, it would have been impossible to say what he might or might not have done in pure literature. But he furnished evidence against himself. He tried to write poetry, he tried to write a romance, he tried to retell humorous and witty stories. He did all these things so badly that to credit him with creative imagination or poetic expression is mere folly. In these matters he is like an elephant trying to play the part of an Ariel. It is impossible to do justice to all the points at issue which Mr. Lang meets and discusses. 98 [Feb. 1, THE DIAL. The general aspects of the argument are all that we can attend to, but as far as we can see he weaves his minute web of scholarship without flaw. He writes as one of those who know, and, as he says in his opening paragraph, " the Baconian theory is universally rejected in En- gland by the professors and historians of English literature, and generally by those who have no profession save that of Letters." The same can probably be said for America. In other words, it is rejected by all those who are competent to judge. The conclusion of the whole matter—but we fear there can be no conclusion, no speedy one at least. A vagary, a heresy has entered the world. It appeals to the iconoclasm innate in many minds, and it appeals somewhat to class prejudice. It will have to work itself out, as heresies do. We are sometimes told that having the Shakespearean work, it really does not mat- ter to the world who created it. Well, it is a poor world which refuses gratitude and honor to its greatest. And if robbing a writer of his reputation becomes the fashion it will react on the literary creators to come. Foolishly or not, an author is usually buoyed up by the hope of influence and remembrance. If he finds that he may be frustrate of the future, may very probably be cheated of his fame, he may turn his energies to other work, or do only what will suffice for his own day. Charles Leonard Moore. The Philosophy op Walking.* The true devotee of walking, if he happens also to possess the knack of writing, will sooner or later betray his own most cherished prin- ciple. He knows beyond all other knowledge that walking is a gift of the gods, to be rever- ently enjoyed and not to be chattered about; he realizes to the full the profanity of staining with inky words those memories of sun-saturated and wind-swept days that have been his upon the open road. But the very ardor of his gratitude for that high gift, the very intensity of his enthusiasm inspired by those beatific memories, seem to impel him irresistibly to utterance; and sooner or later he becomes aware of something before him, the work of his own impious hand, —a poem or an essay, perhaps even a book, in celebration of the mystic joys of the road. The latest of such apostates is Mr. Arthur * Walking Essays. By Arthur Hugh Sedgwick. New York: Longmans, Green, & Co. Hugh Sedgwick,—the greatest, also, we might say, for his sin extends to an entire volume of duodecimo proportions. But Mr. Sedgwick is no callous or unconscious offender: he pleads guilty at the very outset, and makes a penitent appeal for absolution, in the form of a neatly- rhymed dedication. Here are two of its nine stanzas: "How vain my effort, how absurd, Considered as a symbol! How lame and dull the written word To you the swift and nimble! How alien to the walker's mind, Earth-deep, heaven-high, unflllable, These petty snarls and jests ill-laid And all the profitless parade Of pompous polysyllable! "But yet, I feel, though weak my phrase My rhetoric though rotten, At least our tale of Walks and Days Should not go unforgotten; At least some printed word should mark The walker and his wanderings, The strides which lay the miles behind And lap the contemplative mind In calm, unfathomed ponderings." All this is too deprecatory. There is really noth- ing whatever of the petty or the pompous in Mr. Sedgwick's pages, and his rhetoric is unim- peachable. Indeed, of all the fine fellows, from Hazlitt to Mr. Belloc, who have written of walk- ing, few have shown a neater facility of composi- tion, a fuller flavor of wit and high spirits, or a closer philosophic grasp of the subject. And it should be remembered that Mr. Sedgwick has had to sustain his pitch through eight chapters, whereas the others wrote only a single essay apiece. In his first paper, on "Walking and Conver- sation," while reasserting the basic truism that walking and talking are wholly incompatible, Mr. Sedgwick refutes for all time the superficial corollary that walkers are therefore by tempera- ment a morose and unsocial tribe. "Nothing can be further from the truth. Only by construing sociability in the very narrow sense of com- pliance with current social conventions, can you justify such a position; and even so, I would ask, are walkers the only men who have ever omitted calls or trifled with dance invitations? But if sociability is taken in its true sense as indicating a friendly attitude of mind, I say there is more of it between two walkers treading the eighteenth mile without a word spoken, than between any two diners-out talking twenty-four to the dozen, as if there were a tax on unaccompanied monologue, and a graduated super-tax on silence. When put to the ulti- mate test of fact this becomes clear. If you have walked with a man you will lend him tobacco, half-a-crown, nay, you will lend him your map; if you have only dined with him, I doubt if you would lend him a silk hat." Closely related in substance to this essay is 1913] 99 THE that on "Walking as a Social Form." Con- scious of the fact that the walking fraternity pursue their joys under the shadow of a certain stigma, as enemies in a way to the recognized social forms—dancing, teas, calls, dinners, and what not,—Mr. Sedgwick proceeds to a close philosophic analysis of social forms in general. The result of his investigation is as revolution- ary and liberating to the walker as are the con- clusions of M. Bergson to the ordinary mortal. Instead of a cringing apologia or a dogmatic defiance, as were hitherto his only resources against the taunts of dancers and diners and tea-bibbers, the walker may now triumphantly refute the validity of that "futile decalogue of mode" to which society has so long given its sanction, and point with serenity to the not distant day when walking will be popularly re- garded as the only authentic expression of the social spirit. Greatly daring, though not without reluctance (for "controversy of any kind is naturally repug- nant to the amiable nature of a walker "), Mr. Sedgwick devotes a chapter to " Walking Equip- ment." Here are revived some mighty questions which have split the ranks of walkers from time immemorial,—questions such as those of high shoes versus low, long trousers versus short, hats versus no hats, or (turning to the internal needs of man) of meat versus vegetables, beer versus water, and so on. Then there are the finer philosophic distinctions, such as the con- figuration of coats, the functions of waistcoats, the necessity of ties, and the moral value of walking sticks. Within this bristling palisade of problems Mr. Sedgwick walks with fine tact and conciliatory discretion; though he does not hesitate upon occasion to record his own convictions,— as witness the spirited denuncia- tion of beer. (It must be owned, however, that the force of this diatribe is much weakened by a prefatory note disclaiming any application of the remarks to Munich beer.) We wish that space were available for some indication of the wealth of good things in Mr. Sedgwick's other chapters,—in that on " Walker Miles," the humble cicerone of Surrey highways and field-paths; on "Walking and Music," in which the iconoclastic digression on dancing is the best part; on "Walking in Literature," where we rejoice to see justice at last done to that "living embodiment of all that is best in walking," Vernon Whitford; on "Walking Alone," with particular reference to walking in London; and, finally, on " Walking, Sport and Athletics." But we can do no more than quote this concluding apostrophe of the essay last- named: "Poor, ill-used, neglected, misunderstood body! Our ancestors soddened you with port: our grandfathers overlooked you while they muddied with the soul and mind which are bound up with you: ascetics starved you and hedonists cultivated you in patches: doctors analysed you till there was nothing left but a catalogue of inanimate fragments: economic forces penned you in dens and prisons: fashion clothed you in impossible gar- ments, and kept you up at hours and in atmospheres which outraged your most sacred instincts. And now I make you sit here writing—writing! For heaven's sake, come out for a walk." It would be rather distressing to have to con- template the mental equipment of any true "companion of the boot" who did not find infinite relish in Mr. Sedgwick's pages. Many of the walking tribe will, with the reviewer, lay the book down at last in a mood of exalted satis- faction comparable only to that which comes to one after a long day's tramp in the open, when, over tea and a pipe in one of those enchanted gardens that hide so unsuspectedly behind the dusty road-fronts of certain well-remembered English inns — say the " Burford Bridge" at Dorking or the "Rothay " at Grasmere—one muses in vacuous complacency over the rosy aspect of things in general, and the celestial pleasures of walking in particular. Waldo R. Browne. Recent Fiction.* Mr. Theodore Dreiser has been long-winded enough in his two previous performances, but in his third novel, "The Financier," he has carried analysis and amplification to an extreme hitherto unattained. There are nearly eight hundred pages in this book, and the story that they tell might have been more effectively set forth with half the number of words. He cannot introduce a new character, of however minor significance, without telling us all about him, or a new situation without enveloping it in a cloud of comment and exposition. The details of Cowperwood's stock manipulations are explained in a manner that may be interesting to stock- brokers, but are unspeakably wearisome to the reader who is impatient for action and results. * The Financier. By Theodore Dreiser. New York: Harper & Brothers. The Net. By Rex Beach. New York: Harper & Brothers. The Olympian. A Story of the City. By James Oppenheim. New York: Harper & Brothers. Mrs. Lancelot. A Comedy of Assumptions. By Maurice Hewlett. New York: The Century Co. The Strong Hand. By Warwick Deeping. New York: Caasell & Co. The Lure of Life. By Agnes and Egerton Castle. Garden City: Doubleday, Page & Co. 100 [Feb. 1, THE DIAL When the financier is on trial for embezzlement, we are given all the steps of the legal procedure, and even the twelve good men and true who act as jurors in the case are individually characterized. The fault of over-elaboration is much more grievous than it was in the case of Mr. White's "A Certain Rich Man," which the present novel resembles in both theme and construction. Mr. Dreiser gives us truth, no doubt, and in that fact is the defence of his method, but it is truth in conglomerate chunks such as the literary artist is under bonds to dispense with. Cowperwood, the chief figure in this narra- tive, is described as a man who "never gave a thought to the vast palaver concerning evil which is constantly going on." He is utterly without moral sense, and devoid of any principle other than expediency. Born in Philadelphia in the thirties, the son of a bank officer, his attention is early fixed upon the financial game, and he determines as a boy to get into it. While still at school, he carries out certain sharp business transactions, and thereby gets his start. After various experimental sallies, he gets into the stock exchange, and enters upon his real career. Every trick of manipulation seems to come to him intuitively, and he becomes an adept at juggling with values. He makes a specialty of trac- tion stocks, and drags the city treasurer—a weak creature—into his toils, acting as agent for the city loan, and borrowing the city funds to use in his specu- lative enterprises. His undoing comes with the Chi- cago fire of 1871 and the ensuing panic, and with the simultaneous exposure of his liaison with the daughter of an Irish contractor who has befriended him. The whole rotten situation is brought to light, and he is pursued both by the public clamor that de- mands a scapegoat and by the private vengeance of the outraged father. In spite of every legal subtlety that can be employed in his favor, he becomes a bankrupt and a convict with a prison sentence of several years. The actual term is cut short to about a year by means of a pardon, and Cowperwood, a free man, finds in the panic of 1873 and the failure of Jay Cooke & Co. the occasion for rehabilitating his fortunes through his knowledge of the stock market. Then he starts for the West to build up a new career in Chicago. Getting his wife to consent to a divorce, he takes his paramour with him, and there the story ends. Those who are familiar with the financial his- tory of recent times know what followed, for, while the study of Cowperwood is doubtless not an exact portrait, it presents so many points of similarity to the figure of a notorious buccaneer of recent days that the reader early entertains a suspicion of his identity. It becomes more than a suspicion when we read this note of his life in the penitentiary. "Every evening he had studied the sky from his narrow yard, which resulted curiously in the gift in later years of a great reflecting telescope to a famous university." The word "reflecting" may be inten- tional, but we imagine it to be a slip of a sort which the author frequently makes, as when (about 1840) Cowperwood is made to learn the difference between a state bank and a national one. One of the noticeable characteristics of the novel is a certain slovenliness both in the use of language and in the statement of fact. The following instances may be adduced: "The great Chicago fire, October 7th, 1871, . . . began on Saturday, October 7th, and continued apparently unabated until the following Wednesday." The fire began on Sunday evening, the 8th, and had spent its fury early Tuesday morning. Our other instance is in this description of a waltz: "He had put his hand to her waist. His right arm held her left ex- tended arm to arm, palm to palm. Her right hand was on his shoulder, and she was close to him, looking into his eyes." A waltz according to these specifica- tions would excite much admiration in the onlookers. The author of "The Financier" is committed to a method of unflinching realism which makes such an absurdity as this unusually conspicuous. His realism also leads him, on at least two occasions, to forget all the claims of reticence in dealing with the rela- tions between men and women. And we must say that the minute description of the costume worn by Cowperwood's paramour, given us whenever she makes an appearance, is calculated to get on the reader's nerves. Mr. Rex Beach has taken for the subject of his new novel the New Orleans riots some twenty years ago, the disturbances which subjected a number of Italians to the summary process of lynch law, and caused international complications, the echoes of which have not yet died away. To this theme as a climax he works up, beginning his tale in Sicily several years earlier, with the brutal assassination of a young landed proprietor, just about to become a bridegroom, through the agency of the Mafia. His betrothed, maddened by her bereavement, vows ven- geance, and her cause is also taken up by the Amer- ican friend of the murdered man, who has come to Sicily for the wedding. Then the scene shifts to New Orleans, where the American has his home, and whither the criminals flee for a refuge. The girl simply blots herself out of existence, becoming a nurse in a religious house in New Orleans, and even her collaborator in the plan of vengeance does not suspect that she is living in his own city. Then a series of crimes, presumably attributable to Italians, arouse New Orleans to indignation, and Blake be- comes instrumental in bringing them home. Build- ing better than he knows, he discovers that he has unearthed the man who had been guilty of the Sicilian crime of years ago, and reveals a wealthy and respected Italian merchant of the city as the secret head of the Mafiosi. Then comes the trial, in which a pusillanimous jury does not dare to con- vict, although the evidence furnishes unquestionable proof of guilt. The sequel is what history records, and, although we are no apologists for lynch law, it must be admitted that the author makes a case that works upon our sympathies. The whole story is melodrama of the better sort, moving steadily and 1913] 101 THE DIAL. relentlessly to its tragic predetermined close. It is admirable in its construction, and every episode fits logically into the plot. Not upon a single page does the interest flag, and the situation is kept tense all the time. Moreover, the author displays more knowledge of life and more evident powers of char- acterization than we have hitherto found in his romantic inventions. In the end, Blake marries the girl, which has been a foregone conclusion all the time. When Kirby Trask starts from somewhere in the middle West to conquer the world, he takes with him the memory of a successful college career fol- lowed by a brief reportorial experience, and a letter of introduction to the magnate who controls the steel trust. The letter does him no particular good, but he has industry and willingness, and he obtains and holds several unpromising jobs until he feels himself on his feet. Eventually, he succeeds to the position of the steel trust magnate by the romantic process of winning the latter's daughter. He does not do anything in particular to deserve such a spectacular success, and when the story ends, he is well on the way to develop into the same sort of cold-blooded and unscrupulous man as the one who has unwill- ingly taken him for a son-in-law. The story of his rise to power is unconvincing, because it does not appear to be a triumph of either business genius or moral endowment. It is for the most part a "fluke," and there is about it no touch of that idealism which we have a right to expect in stories of the present sort. This rather unwholesome story is the work of Mr. James Oppenheim, and its title is "The Olympian." It is realistic and in many ways vital, but is rather common and uninspired in treatment. "A Comedy of assumptions" is Mr. Maurice Hewlett's description of "Mrs. Lancelot," his latest novel in the Meredithian manner. Among the assumptions not specified, which however are borne in upon the reader's consciousness, are the identities, respectively, of the heroine (here called Georgiana) with Sanchia, and of her poet-lover with Senhouse. As for the Duke of Devizes, we are compelled to think of him as no other than the Iron Duke, because the time of the story is that of the Reform Bill agitation, and there is no other possible Duke of that time whom we could invest with the powers and the qualities here attributed to the figure of Mr. Hewlett's por- trayal. The Duke's infatuation for Mrs. Lancelot fits perfectly with that well-known trait of his character which made him silly in the presence of a petticoat, and there is a certain piquancy in finding him here presented as the poet's rival for the affections of Sanchia-Georgiana. Mr. Lancelot is a third contest- ant for that prize, but being merely her husband, and a person so mean-spirited as to seek advancement through his wife's influence with the Duke, he gets considerably less than a third share of our sympathies, since we feel that he has brought the pangs of jealousy upon himself. The story is animated by a spirit of delicious comedy, and is notable for its psychological discernment. But we must confess that the material is thin, and that the story (considered merely as such) drags not a little toward the end. Mr. Warwick Deeping is a novelist whose work is always interesting; his situations are well con- ceived and firmly handled. It is not, then, greatly to his disparagement to say that ''The Strong Hand" is an inferior example of his work. His story is that of an enemy of the people in Ibsen's sense — the story of a physician in a country town, who seta the respectable villagers by the ears when he pokes into their wells and drains, and discloses the most shocking conditions of sanitation. The hero of this crusade is a young surgeon who comes to the village as assistant to the doddering old practi- tioner in whose hands the health of the community has hitherto been trusted. The practical investiga- tions and the blunt speech of the new-comer soon get him into opposition with his chief, and into disfavor with the propertied classes. It takes the horrors of an epidemic to show that he has been a prophet and to justify his actions. Meanwhile, dismissed from his post, he is forced to fight single-handed for decent conditions, and gains his ends only after a hard struggle. His triumph is a little qualified, for toward the end he is forced to make the hard choice between the claims of love and of duty, and love gets rather the better of it, thereby weakening his sense of responsibility, and making him a little less than the moral hero he has set out to become. "I had the mind of a monk, and you have put the passion of a man into me." This may be taken as the text or the programme of "The Lure of Life," the new novel by Mr. and Mrs. Castle. It is the story of a student, unexpectedly come into possession of fortune and ancestral acres, who is turned from the ways of scholarship by the attractions of a house- hold upon a neighboring estate. It is a Belgian household, established in England for a part of the year, and it consists of the Count and Countess de Braye and their niece Solange de Flodore. It is the Countess for whom Sir Ughtred first conceives a passion, although she is many years his senior, but he thinks to discern in her a soul-mate, until he makes the alarming discovery that she is only philan- dering with him, and she is by nature a mangeuse d'dmes, winning men's devotion for the zest of the sport, with no idea of playing the game to the limit. The complication resulting from this sentimental adventure leads him into a mariage de convenanee with Solange, a farouche creature who has flouted him, but with whom he discovers himself on the honeymoon to be as deeply in love as the most sentimentally-minded young reader could wish. The story is wholly artificial, and, as knowledge of its authorship would lead one to suspect, positively reek- ing with sentimentality. It sets us wishing, as Mrs. Glyn's "Halcyone" did, that lady-novelists would not attempt to rhapsodize about Greek art and the Greek spirit; they do it so badly. William Morton Payne. 102 [Feb. 1, THE DIAL Bkiefs on New Books. Two French ^'w0 v°lun,es dealing respectively matten 0/the with Puvis de Chavannes and Edou- pretentdav- ard Manet inaugurate a new art series, entitled "French Artists of To-day" (Lip- pincott), which promises to prove useful to Amer- ican lay readers as an introduction to contemporary French art. Paris is at present the eye of humanity, the place where fresh discoveries in vision and ex- periments in expression are most constantly being made, the most highly energized and vitalized centre of artistic production in the modern world. It is fit- ting that a set of handbooks interpreting to us a little of this intense creative activity should begin with studies of the two men who perhaps more than any others are responsible for the enthusiasm and the direction of its progress. Puvis de Chavannes and Edouard Manet, different as they were in experience and in method of expression, were alike in courage, in sincerity, and in power of inspiring their disciples. Puvis de Chavannes began his work much more itni- tatively than Manet, — his early pictures as repro- duced here show little differentiation from the suave commonplaces of the academicians; but he outgrew his training, he dared to analyze his own impres- sions at first-hand and to translate into quietly simple and exquisite idyls the results of his steady contem- plation of nature. There is something of Corot in him and something of Maeterlinck; not that his con- ceptions are not above all his own (the great series of frescoes in the Pantheon is original in every sense of the word), but it is easier in Puvis de Chavannes's work to find echoes of artistic influences than it is in such painting as Manet's. "I am myself alone," shrieked Manet in the face of his first mystified and disgusted public, as he presented to them veracious bits drawn from his own immediate surroundings. He chose to paint the actualities of city life and character, refusing to sentimentalize them as Dumas fiU was doing in his plays, or, like Chavannes, to withdraw from them into woods and fields peopled by his transforming imagination. Look first at "Olympia," wonderful, tarnished, real creature of the cynical Paris streets that she is, and then turn to the nymphs of "The Sacred Wood," and you have the difference between the two men,—the difference, moreover, between the pragmatist and the idealist in art to-day and every day. One kind of vision is as true and as fruitful as the other, certainly in the immediate instance each has proved as stimulating to the sight and imagination of the generation now working as the other, and both have pointed towards equally fresh possibilities in their medium. These little books will perform a valuable service if they rouse interest in such creators as Chavannes and Manet and their followers. Whether the black and white and not always very distinct illustrations, numerous and well-chosen though they are, can sug- gest at all adequately originals so remarkable for color, is more than a question; Claude Monet and the later impressionists would surely lose most of their charm in similar reproductions. Yet the vol- umes pretend only to be introductory to a large field of study, and for that purpose they furnish necessary machinery; the introductions and notes, translated from the French of excellent critics like Andre1 Michel and Louis Hourticq, are refreshingly enthu- siastic and undidactic, and biographical and biblio- graphical details are sufficiently indicated. Whatever may be one's philosophical IZneTwomen. presuppositions as to the relative excellence of Buddhism, Confucian- ism, Taoism, and Christianity, one can scarcely lay down Miss Margaret E. Burton's little volume, "Notable Women of Modern China" (Revell), with any heart left to quarrel with the missions that have produced these particular specimens of modern women. The book consists of sketches of the lives and characters of six Chinese women, all of them Christians. Three of the women are physicians, one is the widow of a mandarin of high rank, one was a teacher, and one a former Taoist nun. The sketches vary somewhat in interest, but no one of them is lacking in value as a document to those who desire to weigh dispassionately the achievement of Chris- tian missions in China. Readers who are at all familiar with the Chinese race will not be wholly surprised by the remarkable charm and attractive- ness of nature attributed to all the women depicted, but few will be prepared to discover in a Chinese woman capacity and ability of such extraordinary degree as seem to be possessed by two or more of the subjects of the volume, notably by Miss Mary Stone, the Kiukiang physician. The Chinese are frequently called a passive race, capable of moving only in masses, and wholly deficient in initiative. Either the characterization fails to take account of the influence of environment, and of the change in race habits with the change in environment, or else the Christian religion begets traits contradictory of the habits of the race to which the individual belongs. Only in one of these two ways can we account for the initiative and individuality which characterize the subjects of Miss Burton's sketches. The men who appear incidentally in the book share these traits with the women. The most remarkable person of the six studied is Dr. Mary Stone. The daughter of a Chinese pastor, herself thoroughly prepared by missionary teachers for an American college educa- tion, and graduated with honor from the medical school of the University of Michigan, Dr. Stone has demonstrated, according to the testimony of many capable witnesses, extraordinary gifts as a physician, surgeon, administrator, and teacher. Beginning with her friend Dr. Ida Kahn, who later instituted a new work in another city, Dr. Stone has for years conducted a hospital at Kiukiang, securing the funds, designing the buildings, training all the assistants, organizing the staff, and achieving remarkable suc- cess as physician and surgeon. But her ability as organizer, her achievement as a teacher of nurses, her sway over the extensive work that she has de- 1913] 103 THE DIAL veloped, are no more impressive than are her per- sonal character and her social attractiveness. As the central figure in the book, Miss Stone is surrounded by almost equally pleasing personalities, one of the most winsome being her younger sister,—victim a few years ago to tuberculosis, but leaving behind a record of unusual ability and achievement and of great sweetness of nature. Miss Burton's book should have a wide reading, and one may venture to hope that it will dispel at least a small part of the fog of misconception which clouds American thought in regard to the Chinese. Shaketpeare Professor George H. Palmer's "In- • • The educational use of current news and reviews, as such news and reviews are to be found in some of the best of our periodicals, is gaining recognition in public schools of the higher grades, in schools of journalism, and elsewhere. One well- known weekly publication of this character takes justifiable pride in the fact that it has been selected as a means of instruction in current history and liter- ature by a number of teachers and school superin- tendents in various cities, and it issues an interesting account of the methods adopted in using this some- what novel form of textbook, with testimonials from a number of teachers. The superintendent of the New York City schools said lately in a circular letter to teachers: "It will be well for the teacher to make use of recent or contemporary literature. Many pupils have a not unnatural suspicion of 'classics.' They have a natural interest in what other people are reading and talking about. They should be induced to read the better magazines." A high-school teacher, after naming other good re- sults following upon the use of current periodical literature in the classroom, adds: "The dictionary and encyclopaedia are becoming live books because they help to throw light upon live questions. The real importance and meaning of culture is being appreciated because of the discovery of the bearing which the world's accumulation of knowledge has upon the everyday events of our own time." Incident- ally, action and reaction being equal and opposite, this educational use of periodical literature ought to lift the periodical press to a somewhat higher level and keep it there. The trend of the British book-trade is still upward, in respect to quantity, whatever its quality may be. Statistics for the past year show an increase of more than a thousand titles over the year before in the number of books published, or a sum total of nearly thirteen thousand for 1912. That the novel has not yet entered upon the decline lately predicted for it by certain would-be prophets, seems to be indi- cated by the presence on the list of nearly twenty- three hundred fiction-titles, an increase of about three hundred over the preceding year. Next to the novel the favorite with the British reader is the religious book, and he has had a choice of 934 such works among the year's new books, so that if he felt him- self undergoing moral deterioration from too much novel-reading he had at hand a ready antidote to the pleasant poison; and, conversely, the sermon-reader, nodding at length over the "sixthlies " and "seventh- lies" of his favorite divine, had always within easy reach an abundance of lighter and livelier literature. The sciences, the arts, and the industries were all well represented in the twelve months' book-product. How long it will be before the tide turns and the pres- ent too-rapid rate of increase in book-manufacture gives place to a more wholesome retrenchment, re- mains to be seen. One good book issued in an edi- tion of ten thousand copies is, as a rule, of greater benefit to all concerned than ten books of lesser worth published in editions of a thousand copies each. But this curtailment of output may be a thing now past hoping for. . . . One library's needs, that library being the Enoch Pratt Free Library of Baltimore, are stated plainly and in some detail by Dr. Bernard C. Steiner, the librarian, in his annual report to the trustees lately assembled in yearly conclave. As in the case of some other public institutions, it might be shorter and simpler to state what the Baltimore library does not need than to enumerate its defi- ciencies of equipment. A new central building, or a very considerable addition to the present structure, will occur to everyone who has visited the library as its most urgent want "The last year," says Dr. Steiner, "has brought nearer the time when it will be impossible to have any more books in the Central Library, which is greatly over-crowded. We do not see any possibility of placing a sufficient additional number of shelves anywhere in the building to accommodate any considerable number of books." New branch buildings are also wanted, and more money for books, and an increased appropriation for maintenance, and an extension of the open-shelf system, which will of course be another item of expense, and, in fact, quantities of things that every modern library needs and that every municipal appropriations-committee grudgingly grants. Will the progressive public library ever cease to remind 'us of the horseleech's insatiate daughters? Let us hope not ... A young English poet's visit to America is an occasion of interest to all concerned, especially when the poet is of the standing of the gifted Mr. Alfred Noyes, whose welcome to Boston is just now being planned by the Authors' Club and other soci- eties and individuals of that seat of culture and learn- ing. The Wellesley College students and faculty are to have the pleasure of hearing him read from his own poems on the twenty-seventh of this month, and other readings elsewhere are in prospect Mr. Noyes's early attainment of recognition for his work is noteworthy. The magazines and reviews were hospitable to him from the first, and his initial vol- 1918] 127 THE DIAL ume of verse, "The Loom of Years," appeared when he was but twenty-two years old, soon to be followed by his "Robin Hood," "Flowers of Old Japan," and other works. The writing of the life of William Morris for the "English Men of Letters" series was assigned to him. ... Cooperation between school board and library board is becoming more and more the order of the day. An interesting account of what is effected in that particular at Grand Rapids is published by the public library of that city. In addition to the school collections of books for the use of the school children, there are now in operation six regular branch libraries in as many school build- ings, established by joint agreement of the two boards concerned, the one supplying the necessary quarters with heat, light, and janitor service, the other fur- nishing books, periodicals, card-catalogue, attendants, free lectures, and weekly story hour. Some of these branch libraries have as many as three thousand books on their shelves, with current periodicals to the number of twenty-five or thirty, and the com- bined circulation of all the school branches was last year nearly a third of a million. ... Mr. Harold Monro and his poetry shop are •objects of interest in the London book world just now, and it is to be hoped by poetry-lovers that the interest will continue. Mr. Monro offers something novel in the bookselling business in the form of a bookshop devoted wholly to poetry — a poetry shop, as he calls it—off Theobald's Road, Bloomsbury; and one of his brother poets, Mr. Henry Newbolt, has wished the daring enterprise prosperity in a speech. In this interesting shop are to be found shelves devoted each to a particular poet of some prominence, while the lesser bards, the poets of a single slender volume, are, we assume, assembled in pleasant company. But no friend to the poets can wish these volumes a peaceful repose; rather, may they speedily give place to others, with an accom- panying transfer of the currency of the realm to Mr. Monro's cash-drawer. ... The Harvard University Press has been established by vote of the President and Fellows of Harvard University, and will devote itself to the publication of works of a high scholarly character, especially the products of the pens of Harvard men. For some time the University printing office has issued the annual catalogue and certain department pamphlets, with a number of learned periodicals. Now these publishing activities are to be reorgan- ized and enlarged, so that the Harvard University Press shall take rank with similar publishing depart- ments at other seats of learning. Incidentally the interesting fact is recalled that it was at Harvard College that the first printing-press in America was set up, in 1639, in President Dunster's house, and that from this primitive press came, among other books of more or less fame, the Bay Psalm Book and the Apostle Eliot's Indian translation of the Bible. COMMUNICATION. THE REFERENDUM IN ART. (To the Editor of The Dial.) I should like to say a word on one point in Professor Cockerell's letter in your last number. I must confess that I have not much claim to be heard, for I do not think the matter as important as he does. The picture made very little impression upon me when I first saw it, but it impressed him so that he was quite upset for at least three hours. I cannot claim his earnestness. Still, as he is going to make a mistake, I want to act the part of Cassandra. It will be for others to defend the picture if they see fit. Professor Cockerell thinks it immoral because bad, and bad because immoral (" essentially bad, and there- fore immoral"; "good taste based on fundamental morality "). This may be so, but the view expressed in Professor Cockerell's letter is not convincing on first thoughts. He thinks the features of the lady awry and the colors lurid and unnatural. But the features of almost everybody are a little awry, I am told, and the colors in many not immoral homes are a little lurid and unnatural. "The White Rose " may be exaggerated, but the old story in the Fourth Reader teaches us that exaggeration, even coarseness in execution, may be one of the necessities of art. The really important thing, however, is the summary of postcards. The result of this inquirendo will be as follows: There will be a number of persons with views like Professor Cockerell's who will write to him at once. There will be a slightly smaller number who are opposed to him who will write, on the whole, a little later. These two classes will be controversialists, and their opinions will not be of value, except for students of that branch of un-Systematic Zoology known as Human Nature. There will also be a number of genuine impressions from people interested in the question itself. There will not be enough of these to be more than a contri- bution to esthetic material, but the proportion will be somewhat in favor of those who do not like the picture. If one could get a really representative opinion, the inquiry would be of value. If Professor Cockerell desires a representative opinion,— that is, if he thinks the question of importance, if he will be a scientist out of his chair as well as in it, if he is doing more than starting a magazine discussion,—- he should, I believe, go about it in another way. He ought to cut the picture out of the " Century " and stick it on a piece of paste board, with a pencil attached to it by a string, and then go about Boulder, and make a nuisance of himself by asking everybody to say how the picture affected them when first seen. Or he might show them the picture, and himself note their behavior. When he had five hundred or a thousand impressions he would have something unique in aesthetic, and of great value — to anyone who knew how to use it. May I add that I approve highly of the general prin- ciple of the Referendum in Art, as well as in Politics. The true aesthetic value of anything must be measured by the permanent impression made upon the greatest number. (This, I believe, is the view of Marshall: "Pain, Pleasure, and /Esthetics"; and Sautayana: "The Sense of Beauty"; and also, with pragmatic attachment, of Walter Pater, at the end of his essay on Style.) Edward E. Hale. Union College, Schenectady, N. Y., Feb. 10, 1913. 128 [Feb. 16, THE DIAL Cfre itte Docks. The Kingdom of Righteousness in American Life.* Dr. Rauschenbu8ch's "Christianity and the Social Crisis," published some five years ago, met a need among thinking people so adequately that one was inclined to agree with the author that he had " said all that God had given him to say on our social problems." Yet his new book, "Christianizing the Social Order," proves a work of hardly less importance. The first book was an historic survey; it re- viewed the roots in Judaism of a socialized democracy, the blossoming of the ideal in the Teachings of Jesus, the hampered development in Christian history; and it led to a discussion of the modern duty to realize Christianity on the social side. Almost at that point the present book takes up the theme,—expanding and sup- plementing the treatment of the ideas of Jesus, but carrying the fundamental theme of the Kingdom of Righteousness out into the very midst of our complexities and bewilderments. In some ways it is a better book than the other. The writing is more brilliant. The animus against a sacramental and sacerdotal form of Christianity which seemed to some readers to mar the impartiality of "Christianity and the Social Crisis" is less in evidence. There is persuasive sanity, force in concrete application, and uncompromising courage. Of the earlier work it has been said that it is a book without any hate in it. "So far as I know my own soul that is true of this book also," says the author. The claim is just. Yet many a page is aglow with the "wrath of the Lamb." Dr. Rauschenbusch has an exceptional command of sardonic speech. Perhaps it is a power given by fearless honesty. At all events, the trenchant phrases dissipate self-deception and dislodge conscience from many an easy refuge. The driving directness renders thought of literary qualities insignifi- cant; yet the author is master of an individual style, admirable in cogency and actuality, rich in metaphor "pris sur le vif." In spite of an occasional lapse from dignity, the colloquialisms used are usually effective. Perhaps the book deals too much with transitory and technical matters to be literature in the highest sense; but many of the best qualities that create liter- ature are found in it. The recent awakening of nation and Church •Christianizing the Social Order. By Walter Rauschenbusch. New York: The Macmillan Co. is first presented in a way that will bring home to many in and out of the churches how far organized religion has deliberately travelled in a radical direction; how far it stands committed both to responsibility for social leadership and to a definite economic programme of an advanced type. "The social interest in the Church has now run beyond the stage of the solitary pioneer; it has been admitted within the organ- izations." An inspiriting review, communion by communion, suggests both how general is the awakening and how great the waiting task. A note of suspense is struck with characteristic candor in the following: "I confess that my faith falters in the very act of professing it. The possibilities are so vast, so splendid, so far-reaching, so contradictory of all historic prece- dent, that my hope may be doomed to failure. The American Churches may write one more chapter in the long biography of the disappointed Christ, which our sons will read with shame and our enemies with scorn. But for the present the East is aflame with the day of Jehovah, and a thousand voices are calling. If failure comes, may it find our sword broken at the hilt." In Part II., "The Revolutionary Destiny of Christianity," we return to the firm foundation of the social teachings of Jesus. The facile platitudes to which these teachings are reduced by the sentimentalist meet with summary dis- posal: "Love," left in helpless liquidity,— "It is indeed love that we want, but it is socialized love"; "Stewardship," calling for no change in economic distribution, but simply for faithful disbursement of funds; "The Golden Rule," a span measure "hardly long enough to survey and lay out the building site of the New Jeru- salem"; the impossible call to literal imitation of the life of Jesus. The inadequacy of all these "truly religious ideas" leaves the demand for a religions basis to our task still unanswered. Such basis Dr. Rauschenbusch finds in the con- ception of the Kingdom of God. With fresh force, albeit traversing ground familiar in his first book, he points out the essentially social and practical nature of this ideal as it lay in the Mind of Jesus. Is it possible that he belittles unduly the Apocalyptic element in the Master's thought? Must we dismiss this element, so prominent in the Gospels, as a misreading of His mind or an unfortunate survival? Or may we see here, under local limitations, a strangely wise perception that social development depends not only on quiet growth but on visible catas- trophe, and that as Kropotkin claims, revolu- tionary crises are a necessary part of evolution? Viewed in this light, the most perplexing factor in the faith of the early Church gains permanent 1913] 129 THE DIAL meaning and value. At all events, the idea of the Reign of Righteousness on earth shines out concrete and majestic from these pages. The eclipse of this idea, and the necessity that it be restored to the personal religion of the future, is then briefly sketched. How sharp the contrast between that social vision and the reality! In Part III.,"Our Semi- Christian Social Order," honesty as well as optimism have full sweep. It dwells first on the social domains which have slowly and painfully come under the sway of Christ's Law: the family, the Church itself, education, and—save the mark!—politics. "I confess to some mis- givings in moving that this brother be received among the regenerate, but I plead on his behalf that he is a newly-saved sinner." A good case is made out, by an interesting argument; yet the reader feels that the author has been hard put to it if he must adduce "this brother" as a witness. He is obliged to confess that "in prac- tice we are a nation of backsliders"; yet "these things are in the nature of a derailmentof justice, the road bed and the trackage are still there even when the train is ditched." Fortified, we turn to the "unregenerate sections" of our common life. This book is con- structive, yet more than 160 pages go to pure indictment; and even when we turn from " The Invasion of God's Country" to "The Direction of Progress," indignation calls us back, In the attempt to write most positively, the pen lingers, tipped with acid or fire, over all that hampers our Christian will. The discussion covers sadly familiar ground,—but in a manner so fresh and pungent that the most jaded mind finds its reaction from our modern sins sharp- ened and focussed. The point of view is Chris- tian, not economic: "Does our business system create sound and noble manhood? Does it make it fairly easy to do right and hard to do wrong? Does it call men upward or tempt them down- ward?" Answers are obvious; the treatment is ironic, unsparing, fully cognizant of individual helplessness, yet none the less never blinking the moral responsibility of each of us to help the collective action which shall release us from our collective chains. "Such power on the one hand and such weakness on the other constitute a solicitation to sin to which human nature ought never to be subjected." "A reign of competi- tion is a reign of fear. ... A reign of fear is never a reign of God." Such are some among the terse summaries of the outcome of capitalism. One is tempted to cull quotations, to dwell on the caustic presentation of facts. Facts about adulteration: "A new process makes an emul- sion of skim milk for ice-cream that looks like the richest kind of cream. That ought to be a great saving to the country. But this is a hymn of many verses. We must chant the rest on the Day of Judgment." Facts about the muzzling of the press. And facts about education: "The great givers are acting like a soft pedal on the piano. There is probably not a teacher with a real message to our age who has not felt com- pelled by consideration for himself and his insti- tution to soften and dull down the very things that most demand utterance." These be plain words, my brethren: they afford pleasant read- ing,— heart-breaking thinking. All is free from hysteria or over-statement. When Dr. Rauschenbusch has finished marshalling his evidence, "The Case of Christianity against Capitalism" is complete. It has been complete this many a year; and one turns eagerly to the later constructive dis- cussion, as to how a Christian economic order should be constituted. Perhaps slight disap- pointment awaits one. There is a drop, as the author is aware, from the high levels of religious thought to schemes for protecting the laborer, socializing land, guaranteeing employment. These ideas, the usual programme of economic advance, are unluckily losing their freshaess almost before they get out into life. But as the sure fight gathers round them they will regain it. Meantime, the descent from religious passion to a precise programme of reform is one phase of that voluntary self-humiliation of the divine which is the world's salvation. At least, the dis- cussion does not satisfy itself with easy truisms. The elasticity and modesty of mind are refresh- ing. "There is only one thing which I am pre- pared to assert with absolute confidence about coming events: that they will not happen in the way I expect them to happen." Yet the pro- posals are cheerily concrete,—a true help to the necessary task of "translating the fundamental utterances of the Mind of Christ" into "terms large enough to make them fully applicable to modern social life." Like all of us, Dr. Rauschenbusch stands for the abolition of spe- cial privilege; like all good socialists, he vindi- cates the sacred rights of property, pointing out that "a condition in which millions of people have no share at all in the productive capital of the nation . . . debases humanity, under- mines the Republic, and desiccates religion." There is a picturesque apologue on page 338; a delectable rewriting of the principles of that choice organization, the "Liberty and Property 130 [Feb. 16, THE DIAL Defense League," on page 851. There is plea for the indefinite enlargement of the collective form of property. "Economic Democracy " and "The Economic Basis of Fraternity" are two good formulae under which the discussion pro- ceeds. The last formula leads beyond detail into the demand for " the evolution of a coopera- tive economic organization as wide as society," which is obviously "the largest constructive moral task ever undertaken." Yet the next chapter shows the task to be no novelty, point- ing out in cogent fashion the transmission of this highest instinct for social organization down the ages, from the days of tribal communism through monasticism, to the expression of fra- ternal ideals in the collegiate communities of our own day. Having then reached "The Powers of the Coming Age" we review modern tendencies in the same direction. The coopera- tive movement, organized labor, and single tax agitation prepare us for a fairly full consideration of socialism. The author's brotherly yet severe treatment of the false emphasis and the innate dangers of political and party socialism, renders all the more effective his grave and distinct align- ment of himself with the socialist movement in its broader but no less definite sense. We have been studying " The Direction of Progress"; we turn in conclusion to "The Methods of Advance." The finely democratic treatment recognizes the full value of that working-class movement on which philanthropy and reform too often look askance. Clever application of the Scriptures is a specialty of Dr. Rauschenbusch. He tells us that education has performed for the torpid classes of society the miracle Elisha performed on the Shnnammite's son, when he warmed the dead body till the child sneezed seven times and opened his eyes. "The working class has sneezed seventy times seven. It looks like convulsions, but it means the awak- ening of life." And again in more sober vein: "If the banner of the Kingdom of God is to enter through the gates of the future, it will have to be carried by the tramping hosts of labor." Yet the book ends on the note of stirring appeal to the privileged and the religious in the name of the faith they profess. At the outset this note had been struck: "It rests largely with the Churches whether the emancipation of the working classes will come by a gradual and peaceful evolution of society or whether we are to have the folly and woe of the civil war over again." Now the note is repeated. The Marxian may be right in his cynicism. Perhaps no class will ever as a whole vote away its own privileges. Nevertheless "men and women of the wealthy class who have been converted to the people as well as to God can perform a service of the highest value by weakening the resistance which their classes will inevitably offer to the equalization of property." "In- dividuals will respond: more of them, I believe, than in any similar situation in history before." "Even a few renegades from the rich are inval- uable. It takes a sharp blow from the outside to crack an eggshell: the soft bill of a chick can break it from within." And the conclusion of the whole matter is that the Church "must send out men and women to finish up the work which Christ began. Is the Church supplying society with the necessary equipment of such personalities? Let us grant that it can never reach all: but is it making Christian revolutionists of those whom it does teach and control?" Such a Christian revolutionist at all events is Dr. Rauschenbusch himself. "Those men who have kept their mental balance against the dogmatism of the cruder types of socialism, who have guarded the purity of their life against the looseness of modern morals, who have cherished the devoutness of intimate religion in the drought of scepticism, but who have also ab- sorbed the socialist analysis of our collective sins and the socialist hope of a fraternal democ- racy, stand as a class marked by God as his own." The writer of such a book as this is one of those heralds on whom he calls: "Trumpeter, rally us, rally us, rally us On to the City of God." VlDA D. SCDDDER. Modern Humanism.* It was only a short time ago that John Addington Symonds, in his "Essays, Specula- tive and Suggestive," summed up with sanity and sweep the solemn function of the critic. "In order to profit by the vast extension of artistic knowledge in this generation and to avoid the narrow- ness of sects and cliques, the main thing for us is to form a clear conception of the mental atmosphere in which sound criticism has to live and move and have its being. 'The form of this world passes; and I would fain occupy myself with that only which constitutes abiding relations.' So said Goethe; and these words have much the same effect as that admonition of his, 'to live with steady purpose in the Whole, the Good, the Beautiful.' The true critic must divest his mind from what is transient and ephemeral, must fasten upon abiding relations, hleibende Verhaltnisse." "The Masters of Modern French Criticism. By Irving Babbitt. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co. 1913] 131 THE DIAL If the critic is to accept such an exalted creed he can no longer live, as so many are doing, in dalliance with his own lawless moods. To be sure, Symonds's younger contemporary, Oscar Wilde, would have taken another path, and with clash of cymbal and riotous song would have led us along the path of "the great confusion" which Sainte-Beuve foresaw. But despite the fact that Wilde promised with his luxurious impressionism somehow to regenerate the world, despite the fact that the influence of "The Critic as Artist" tinges some of the soberest utterances of many later critics (such a penetrating essay, for instance, as Mr. Lewis Gates's "Impressionism and Appreciation"), Anglo-Saxondom has re- coiled from the gospel which would lead us to the flickering irony of Renan's later years or compel us with Anatole France to "despise men ten- derly." With all his specious exaltation, Wilde could not in good faith have subscribed to the lofty yet tempered dictum of William Sharp: "When I speak of Criticism I have in mind not merely the more or less deft use of commentary or indication but one of the several ways of literature and in itself a rare and fine art: the marriage of science that knows and of spirit that discerns. The basis of Criticism is imagination, its spiritual quality is simpli- city, its intellectual distinction is balance." Here, without surrendering the new honors that the impressionist has claimed for criticism, is a sober ideal instead of smart paradox. Where, however, shall we seek for this balance? Just how may we occupy ourselves with the abiding relations of things? The historian of criticism will find several brilliant answers among latter-day American critics. He will find something of the wisdom of poetry in the essay of Mr. Gates,—though he will note that "ap- preciation," however tempered by richness of historical equipment and sensitive knowledge of one's own age, loses sureness in its abnegation of the critic's memorial right to judge, and loses sweep and inspiration in consenting to be for its own age alone. The historian will be stimulated by Professor Trent's essay on " The Authority of Criticism," in which, with his characteristic keen sense of both sides of a question, the author maps out domains in which the criticism of tradition and the criticism of impressions may do their best work. But the historian may well wish that the two criticisms could have been more closely fused. The historian will enjoy the drastic iconoclasm of Professor Spingarn's "The New Criticism." But after the shouting and the tumult dies and he finds himself with only the talisman, "What has the poet tried to express and how has he expressed it?" which Professor Spingarn takes from the Germans and Carlyle as the sole vital and unifying concern of criticism, the historian will be fain to ask himself how such a slender relic will save him from "the great confusion." A few of Professor Spingarn's applications will make this danger clear. His assault on the criticism by genres is wantonly destructive of a method that has brought us views penetrating as often as pedantic* In his repudiation of all moral judgment in literature he falls into the modern heresy of talking about things, including art, for their own sake, as if life were as staccato as an index. In his con- temptuous dismissal of all efforts at a theory of style he but sends us back to a rereading of a long line of great essays that make us, despite their inconsistencies, nod our heads and smile at the image-breaker and wonder whether such profound speculations are indeed never to be increased in the land. No, this talisman is too slight and too explosive. With less reservation we read Mr. Paul Elmer More's oracular utter- ances in the seventh series of the "Shelburne Essays." We find much to ponder in his tracing of a spiritual family, after the manner of a Sainte- Beuve, which includes Cicero and Erasmus, Boileau and Arnold, and which quietly sets the influence of these men above the fulminations of a Saint Paul, a Luther, a Carlyle. We ap- prehend the fine subtlety with which he seizes upon that theory of concentrated race-experience which set Walter Pater to dreaming morbidly if enchantingly over La Gioconda and with which Oscar Wilde would have freed his cult of sultry egoists from moral and social responsibility; and we follow the noble enthusiasm with which the American critic rescues this conception of an inheritance of "the unconquerable hopes and defeated fears of an immeasurable past, the trag- edies and the comedies of love, the ardent aspi- rations of faith, the baffled questionings of evil, the huge laughter at facts, the deep-welling pas- sion of peace " for a discipline making up its loss of original intensity with a significance and de- sign, a new unity in which ephemeral life is win- nowed and " fitted into that great ring of eternity which Henry Vaughan saw as in a dream." And having reached an apex in this hymnlike human- istic solution, we are prepared to consider Profes- sor Babbitt's "The Masters of Modern French Criticism," not as a climax after Mr. More's golden words, but as an elaborate and memorable case for humanism and the dignity of criticism. * See Professor Nielson's introduction to Professor Gum- mere's "The Popular Ballad" for some keen suggestions for fresh use of the examination of genres. 132 [Feb. 16, THE DIAL It is refreshing by contrast with the narrow view of criticism which stifles us for all Profes- sor Saintsbury's learning, taste, and exuberance in his massive History, to open a book which, from a most comprehensive survey of the bril- liant men who have done more than any other nation or age for criticism, ramifies in a set of doctrines which shape for us, at least in outline, a theory of conduct, a theory of education, a philosophy, along with a theory of criticism. Many of our readers are already familiar with Professor Babbitt's formula. In his "Liter- ature and the American College " and in "The New Laokobn " he assumed a role more dicta- torial than any English critic since Matthew Arnold, with the possible exception of Mr. More, and legislated with rich scholarship and an insight that has made his assurance at once impressive and natural. He would have us mediate between the romantic emotionalism that still flows strong from Rousseau, and the scientific naturalism that has swept over and dazzled all modern beliefs and aspirations, with a humanistic discipline that at present finds litcle voice, but which has claimed, since the days of Plato at least, an imposing minority of seers who have championed it more or less completely. To many of us so long attuned to the nineteenth- century philosophy of change this formula has an air of simplicity with sweep that has made its promise seem all too magical, all too facile, for a disease so deep-seated and fascinating as is our modern skeptical neurasthenia; while Professor Babbitt himself has been tempted by its sov- ereign virtues into certain procrustean or at least over-hasty applications,—as in his dubious comments on programme music in "The New Laokoon." But all friends and all foes worthy of the name will be delighted with the restraint and the sureness with which he uses his bright weapon in his latest volume. Let us approach him once more through an examination of kindred spirits-. Symonds notes three types of critic: the judge, the showman (i. e. the impressionist), and the scientific analyst. "The true critic," he holds, " must combine all three types in himself, and hold the balance by his sense of their reciprocal relations." In a notable passage he applies this critical spirit to humanistic education. "Heraclitus has a weighty saying, which those who aim at sound criticism should bear in mind. 'It behoves us,' he remarks, ' to follow the common reason of the world; yet though there is a common reason in the world, the majority live as though they possessed a wisdom peculiar each unto himself alone.' "The object of education is to provide us in youth with a sense of this common reason — a just if general view of what mankind as a whole is—a notion of what has been thought and wrought by our race in its totality of what humanity at its best and strongest has achieved by interrupted yet continuous efforts of how we come to be what we are and to think and feel as we do. Humanism, the study of history and literature and art and law, suffices better than any other training . . . because its matter is of greater moral and mental im- portance to humanity. Such education prepares the specialist to judge with width and sympathy and due regard for relations, to overcome personal caprice and predilection and to survey the particular plot he selects for exploration as part of the great whole." Mr. More seems to have much in common with this, yet he touches upon the danger of using the past" too much as a dead storehouse of precepts for schoolmastering the present," and would be careful to ally judgment " to the indwelling and ever-acting memory of things" which consciously creates "the field of the present out of the past." The critical spirit becomes thus akin to "the guiding principle, itself unchanged, at work within the evolu- tionary changes of nature." "Might we not even say," continues Mr. More, " that at a cer- tain point criticism becomes almost identical with education, and that by this standard we may judge the value of any study as an instru- ment of education and may estimate the merit of any special presentation of that study?" Thus Mr. More makes Symonds's standards more flexible without losing his large control. With such men as these Professor Babbitt is, if I read him aright, in close accord. I am not attempting an Alexandrian study of his sources; rather, I am attempting first to introduce him more powerfully with his shield locked with those of a noble phalanx, and then to show with a bare summary of his " Conclusion " how con- spicuously his own crest waves in the bright array. All our examination of other writers will but more sharply define his distinguished con- tribution to that synthetic thought that many youths (of various degrees of age) are dreaming of as the distinctive work with which the twen- tieth century will supplement the nineteenth century of analysis and expansion so courageous and so distressing. Here, then, follows Professor Babbitt's con- clusion in his own words, as far as I can manage it in a difficult precis of such condensed and close reasoning: "From the tyranny of the old neo-classical rules came the revolt of the romanticists in favor of wider knowl- edge and wider sympathy. But the romanticists forget that these are only the feminine virtues of a critic. It is interesting to observe how Sainte-Beuve, as a 'doctor of relativity,' was partly responsible for this resultant 1913] 133 THE DIAL anarchy from which, indeed, in his full maturity, he himself recoiled and enlisted himself with the great judicial conservatives. But iu this doctrine of relativity both impressionist and scientific critic have united, the one prating eternally of books 'suggestive,' the other of books 'significant'; the one denying any impersonal standard, the other entrenched in his theory of the un- knowable. Neither method can lead to any sure dis- tinction between third rate work and a play of Sophocles. Many books once infinitely suggestive and still of the highest historical significance are now seen to be of very inferior value. From Rousseau to the impressionist has echoed ' Man is the measure of all things.' But is one to interpret this in the spirit of the Greek sophists, like M. France who finds us but ' the sport and playthings of mobile circumstances,' or in the spirit of Socrates, like Emerson who so asserts the maxim as to attain to a new sense of the unity of human nature, a unity founded not on tradition but on insight? To Emerson the best books in the world seem to be the work of 'one all-seeing, all-hearing gentleman.' The individual man is the measure of all things only in so far as he has realized in himself this essential human nature. If we learn to separate this from Emerson's conflicting ten- dency to encourage unduly the man who-is undisciplined, unselective, and untraditional we have the corrective to temper that immense relativism which almost paralyzed Sainte-Beuve himself. While the perfect taste thus formed may be a gift divine, inborn, or impossible, it is at least an ideal for humanistic self-discipline that should encourage any sincere and intelligent aspirant to raise himself above that acceptance of anarchy which the impressionist considers inevitable. It is well for us to awaken our senses with the impressionist, but only that we may the better judge. The problem is to avoid the extreme of the pseudo-classical critic who set up a standard entirely outside the individual and the extreme of the impressionist entirely within. We should seek a standard that is in the individual and yet is felt by him to transcend his personal self and lay hold of that part of his nature which he possesses in common with other men. To complete this standard, this judgment of the keen-sighted few in the present needs to be rati- fied by the verdict of posterity. Yet in our day the Rousseauist or pseudo-democrat would value a book not by its appeal to the keen-sighted few, but by its immediate effect on the average man, a humanitarian fallacy which fits in alike with impressionism and com- mercialism. Modern criticism, in getting rid of for- malism and in becoming sympathetic and comprehen- sive, has performed only half its task. The other half is to find some new principle of judgment and selection. We need a critic who rests his discipline and selection upon the past, but who by a constant process of hard and clear thinking is constantly adjusting the experience of the past to the changing needs of the present. Sainte- Beuve can give us a miraculous vision of the past but he is one of the victims of naturalistic fatalism. Goethe, in his humanistic period, is nearer to the ideal than any other modern. But Goethe has a weakness. Although he refused to enter into the deterministic maze that struck proud gloom into both the dogmatic superna- turalists, like Pascal, and our dogmatic naturalists, although he would have us turn from those ultimate problems which may drive us mad to man's works, he conceives of this work too much in terms of the outer world, too little in terms of the individual's inner life. For the man whose attention is exclusively on works is in danger of losing that humility which comes only from a sense of man's helplessness before the infinite. More- over Goethe, even in full maturity, was too full of admiration for unregulated sympathy. Thus his view tends to fly apart into the two extremes which baffle control — the idea of work conceived, primarily in a utilitarian spirit, and diffusive unselective sympathy. As Emerson charges him, he fails to worship the high- est unity. We need a second Boileau, not with the old formalism but with the main results of the great ex- pansion of the last century, who would be further able to make keen discriminations between different degrees of merit and demerit. But we must select without sourness or asceticism. We must avoid the danger of the French reactionary who fails, for instance, in a reaction against naturalism, to take up all that is legitimate in naturalism. We must not dream of an impossible re- turn to the past. Its forms of authority have become impossible for man}' moderns. We must substitute an intuition of something which imposes on man's whole being a controlling purpose. To the influence of Sainte- Beuve, then, the great doctor of relativity, we must bring the controlling influence of Emerson in so far as he is the philosopher of the oversoul. The ideal critic would need to combine the breadth and versatility and sense of difference of a Sainte-Beuve with the elevation and insight and sense of unity of an Emerson." Professor Babbitt's formula is not without its dangers for its creator. It lends justification for that judicial faculty which Professor Babbitt would seem to be inclined temperamentally to over-emphasize himself in spite of his admirable analysis of its excesses in Bruneti&re. It is in- teresting to see the working out of this influence on his style. He has an unusual command of irony. In his earlier volumes this is almost omnipresent. He seems to lunge with a rapier at once trenchant and unnecessarily envenomed. The wound festers. It is possible, we protest, to be a devil of a fighter without being so per- sistently belligerent. We recall Arnold's irony (which he was wont to use even in the face of charges of foppish strutting and triviality). But Professor Babbitt has not the gallantry of Arnold, who, with something of the versatility of Cyrano de Bergerac, bows and smiles as he runs you through. Professor Babbitt frowns a good deal and thrusts viciously. We must hasten to add that there is much more restraint in "The Masters of Modern French Criticism" than in the earlier volumes. But there is still, with an irony more restrained, a feverish quickstep that arises from almost an excess of earnestness. Besides the irritation caused by the cut and thrust manner there comes an allied annoyance: our stinging ears await the grateful cadence of a solemn and exultant period. But Professor Babbitt's own petulance, his own fine zeal, will not let him gratify us. This stylistic defect is likely to be the failing of the critic who remains 134 [Feb. 16, THE DIAL essentially judicial, not with the ponderosity of Johnson but with the crisp proverb-manner of Boileau; and who does not quite gain, much as he may desire it, the full elevation of the more irresponsible emotionalist. It is this excess of the long neglected judicial temper, too, that makes him distrustful, as Arnold was before him, of the identification of critic and artist so frequently urged by the im- pressionists. It is to be regretted that Professor Babbitt accepts the outworn antithesis, "criti- cal" and "creative." Surely the critic may be creative without admiring, as Victor Hugo would have it, "like a brute,"—without seeking to herald his new office with the insincere fanfare of a Wilde. It is interesting here to compare Mr. More, who brings critics at least very close to the creative manner but who would admit that "they are by intellect hesitators," a concession surely not wholly true of the greatest of them. Mr. John McKinnon Robertson ("Science in Criticism," pp. 144 seq.), points out" the nullity of the proposition" that "criticism is a lower form of intellectual effort than those called 'crea- tive,'" and doubtless Professor Babbitt would find sufficient solace in such a contention to urge that my present jangling is to no purpose. There is no space for extended argument. But I would contend that there is something far more important than the gratification of individual vanity in the new conception of the critic as creator; and that since criticism shows signs of marked new developments, since the number of sane critics who insist upon its creative character increases daily, I would repeat that an excess of the judicial temper may tend to deprive criti- cism of this last honor and range that is now its inspiring heritage. But we have quarreled overmuch. It is rather early to forecast a return to the judicial ex- treme. Surely Professor Babbitt's mastery of the sadly neglected judicial faculty has brought him striking results. In a style richly jewelled with choice quotations,—a style which absorbs quotations with the art of Hazlitt, of Byron in "Don Juan," or of Thackeray,— Professor Babbitt follows a method that has been called "collective criticism," a criticism which is too objective to have intolerable acidity, which re- quires toil too epical to appeal to one so-called critic out of a thousand, but which (as Profes- sor Brewster has well pointed out) is a rich field as yet but little trodden.* Professor Babbitt's * " Modern English Literary Criticism." Professor Brew- ster cites perhaps the best example: Mr. J. M. Robertson's essay on Poe, "largely an analysis of the collective estimate of Poe, with comments of his own." chapters on Sainte-Beuve, in particular, are an- alytic and synthetic work of a very high order. Other writers have had at best but partial suc- cess in constructing the necromantic method which Sainte-Beuve himself revealed so way- wardly- But Professor Babbitt has, with great knowledge, patience, and delicate acumen, found all the bright evanescent disclosures in the mas- ter himself and in his most cunning critics, and has woven them into a coat of mail. He has captured Proteus and compelled him to assume permanently his proper form. Such "collective criticism" as this is certainly an admirable ap- plication of Professor Babbitt's own large vision of a method that draws the best from impression- ist, scientific historian, and humanist, that goes to Sainte-Beuve, to Goethe, and to Emerson for a new eclectic philosophy. And we may add that such "collective criticism" as this is, in Professor Babbitt's despite, creative. From his pages those noble warriors of France, Sainte- Beuve, Taine, Joubert, Scherer, Kenan, Bru- netieire, stand forth vivid, scarred. This is dramatic criticism in a new and in a very severe use of a much abused word. Herbert E. Cory. The Befogged Elizabethan Stage.* From being the most neglected field of Eliza- bethan research, the subject of the conditions of stage presentation in Shakespeare's London has become in a single decade one of the most vio- lently debated qucestiones vexatm of recent scholarship. Mr. W. J. Lawrence lays claim, not without reason, to the distinction of having inaugurated this fresh trend of critical specula- tion; and his handsome volume of eleven essays, originally composed at different times between 1902 and the present year, offers an easy mea- sure of the progress which has been attained. During the period spanned by these papers, several thousands of pages, literally, have been published by some twenty writers, in England, Germany, and America, in the effort to eluci- date Elizabethan stage conditions; and the end is assuredly not yet. The pelter of dissertations continues, but the first stage in the investiga- tion is giving place to a second. Instead of far- ranging inquiries, seeking to settle the entire question on independent and rather empirical lines, one finds to-day a close-locked battle waged about half a dozen shibboleths thrown up by the * The Elizabethan Playhouse, and Other Essays. By W. J. Lawrence, Illustrated. Stratford-upon-Avon: .Shakespeare Head Press. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippinoott Co. 1913] 135 TELE DIAL, conflict of opinion. It is less the Shakespearean or the Elizabethan stage as a whole which at present engages the attention of the students than such by-products of discussion as the " alter- nation" and the "plastic" theories, the prin- ciple of " multiple setting," and the " platform" or "picture," "corridor" or "alcove'' stage. The change is, of course, in many ways a mark of healthy progress — an index of the closer range within which the investigations of some of the most acute modern scholars have brought the subject. The absolute results have been well set forth by one of the pioneers in the work, Professor G. P. Reynolds, in a paper in last year's "Modern Philology,"—" What We Know of the Elizabethan Stage." The advance is somewhat painfully brought home to the gen- eral public by the fact that the commentaries in even the most scholarly editions of the Eliza- bethan dramatists have in ten years grown quite superannuated in all that regards details of staging. It is no dispraise of Mr. Lawrence and such of his compeers as Archer, Albright, Wegener, and Reynolds, however, to say that the dispassionate scholar who gives up his days and nights for no small space of time to the careful reading of their treatises is likely to emerge with a sense of the vast preponderance of speculation and inference over established fact. The field whence evidence is to be culled is so broad, and the meagre individual hints so dishearteningly contradictory, that it is not surprising to find vague deduction running riot or chasing itself about in circles of vicious logic. On the principle which now obtains, it would seem essential that the theorist seeking to con- struct a mental concept of the Globe or Fortune stage be able to hold suspended in his mind a clear idea of the actual requirements of every scene of at least a hundred plays. But this is practically impossible. The most assiduous in- vestigators seem hardly to have done more than consider a single striking scene or two from each of thirty or forty plays. Hence, as each student inevitably remembers and stresses, out of the ungovernable multitude, the particular scenes which lean most toward his personal interpreta- tion, it is very natural that discordant views have been able to establish and maintain themselves. Thus the alternation theory, which postulates very precise care in the avoidance of incongru- ous effects, and the so-called "plastic" theory, which believes in the indifference of the Eliza- bethan public to what would be to-day unen- durable clashes of scenic atmosphere, have both been ably expounded on the evidence of the plays themselves. The first indispensable step in the investiga- tion of Elizabethan stage practice has consisted in the general survey of the entire field. Now that this difficult labor is accomplished and a number of general principles set beyond doubt, it should be possible to bring out the details more clearly by concentrating attention upon particular subdivisions of the province. To treat separately the productions of the different thea- tres, especially in the earlier period, is hardly possible on the basis of present knowledge. To begin with the consideration of Shakespeare's works, as Brodmeier did, is to court disaster, for Shakespeare's stage practice was doubtless as genially erratic and as arbitrary as his use of language. Shakespeare wrote with a superla- tive knowledge of the peculiar needs, and even, doubtless, of the undreamed potentialities, of a special company and theatre. To attempt to deduce from his practice alone an idea of the normal usage would be like inferring the char- acteristics of everyday Elizabethan conversation from the soliloquies of Hamlet. The best means of bringing into clear outline the ground principles of Elizabethan staging will probably be to proceed, from the basis of the broad truths established "by the researches of the last ten years, to a more minute study than has yet been attempted of the practice of the earlier playwrights, especially Greene and Marlowe. These poets seem to have had no intimate or exclusive association with any one play-house. They wrote normally, it is certain, for the public stage, but not with their eye upon the peculiar individual requirements of a single company or theatre. That is, they saw the stage, presumably, as the man in the street saw it in their day and as we should first try to see it— in broad outline with a few salient universal features subject to infinite modification in spe- cial cases. When these simple fundamental characteristics have been elicited by microscopic study of the not overwhelmingly numerous dra- mas of the earliest writers for the public stage, we may hope to discover more easily the develop- ments and personal innovations which it seems certain that more advanced and technical artists like Shakespeare and Ben Jonson must have made. From these we may then probably trace the course of evolution through the work of the succeeding seventeenth-century playwrights. Assuredly, if there is any parallel between the progress of the early English stage and that of the dramatic literature with which it was so very 136 [Feb. 16, THE DIAL intimately associated, we must expect to find enormous differences of detail between the stage practice of Marlowe's plays, of Shakespeare's, and of Ford's. No wonder that the arguments which give identical value to evidence from "Alphonsus of Aragon," from "Hamlet," and from " The Broken Heart" leave us no means of distinguishing between the normal and essential and the purely exceptional. The various essays in Mr. Lawrence's book differ greatly in their importance to the student of stage conditions. "The Story of a Peculiar Stage Curtain" and "Proscenium Doors" are written in popular rather than scientific vein; and the same can be said of "The Mounting of the Carolan Masques," which contains, however, some valuable new matter. The treatment of "Early French Players in England" (mainly during the Stuart era), of Shadwell's putative "Tempest" opera, and of the authorship of the "Macbeth " music touches interesting side-issues; but Mr. Lawrence's claim to serious recognition as a purveyor of new light will depend mainly upon his introductory paper on "The Evolution of the Elizabethan Playhouse," with its supple- ment at the end of the volume, and upon the three careful inquiries regarding the situation of the "lords' room," the use of title and locality boards, and the place of music and song in the Elizabethan theatre. These essays, like the others, are written with verve and bear the mark of diligent preparation. That they lead to rather few definite conclusions is perhaps due more to the broad field they seek to cover than to any lack of critical acumen in the author. Very often one finds Mr. Lawrence slipping over the real difficulties of the problem before him with such lighthearted remarks as "There seems to be no valid reason for doubt- ing" (p. 28) and " Some slight evidence exists to show" (ibid). Near the beginning of his first paper (p. 5), Mr. Lawrence remarks that "Au- thentic details of the prime characteristics of the Shoreditch theatres (i.e., the 'Theater' and 'Curtain') are almost wholly lacking." Yet in the same connection he states, on evidence which I am wholly unable to trace, that the " Theater" and " Curtain" were used for bull and bear bait- ings as well as dramatic performances. From this he infers that the theatres in question must have had removable stages; and later (p. 23) he suggests that " one invariable concomitant of the permanent (as opposed to the removable) stage was the oblique entering doors." Here a very interesting theory is built up almost without a prop. The difference in dramatic effectiveness between a stage on which actors may enter through doors set opposite each other toward the front of the platform and a stage where all entrances must be made through openings in the rear wall is of the utmost consequence. If Mr. Lawrence is right, then Shakespeare's com- pany must not only have made a very great ad- vance in the efficiency of their acting when they removed from the "Theater" to the "Globe," but they must also have relapsed periodically into cruder methods whenever they returned, during the years before 1600, from the " Rose" or "Globe" to the "Curtain." If true, this is highly interesting, but proof is lacking both for the conclusion and for the premises. Did the "Theater " and " Curtain " have movable stages? Did movability of stage necessarily involve dif- ference in the shape of the tiring-house facade and consequently in the position of the stage entrances? Another striking statement, for which one would like to have Mr. Lawrence quote satis- factory evidence, is his remark concerning the "remoteness and obscurity"' of the inner stage, "which almost invariably demanded the bring- ing in of lights at the commencement of all inner scenes " (pp. 6,7). The four cases cited in the footnote, where lights are called for by the nature of the scene, certainly prove no such prac- tice. Moreover, would not the contrast between illuminated back scenes and unlighted front scenes, if any authority for the practice could be found, rather serve to emphasize the separate identity of front-stage and rear-stage, which Mr. Lawrence, as a hard and fast opponent of "alternation," rigidly denies? Mr. Lawrence's discussion of title and local- ity boards is, on the whole, excellent; but his solemn treatment of the alternative play titles at the beginning of " Wily Beguiled " and " The Knight of the Burning Pestle" (pp. 51, 52) 3eems much ado about nothing. Surely, nobody in the audience can have seriously expected to see " Spectrum " or "The London Merchant." The false titles were brought in with the privity of the audience, in the one instance as a humor- ous gibe at the much-acted " Spectrum," in the other for the purpose of motivating the outburst of the Grocer and his wife. In the paper just alluded to, and in the final section of the book, the author treats very well the essential principles of multiple setting, but grows vague in his deductions as to the extent to which multiple setting obtained on the public stage. "One has only to make minute examin- ation of the constructive system of Lyly," he 1913] THE DIAL 137 says (p. 59), "to become convinced that the multiple setting held sway at court for more than a score of years after the erection of the Theater and the Curtain (i.e., till after 1596)." Later on, Mr. Lawrence contends very plausibly that Lyly's early court plays (produced circa 1580-86) were acted according to the multiple setting principle (p. 237^".). But does he really mean that this principle held sway " more than a score of years after the erection of the first theatres"; that is, till after Shakespeare's com- pany had begun to carry their plays regularly from the " Theater " and the "Globe " to the court? If Mr. Lawrence means this, proof would be most desirable. Similar vagueness appears in the discussion of the first Blackfriars stage, where it should be remembered in fairness that Mr. Lawrence is writing in haste and without the benefit of Pro- fessor Wallace's very informative recent book on "The Evolution of the English Drama up to Shakespeare." Starting with the bold as- sumption that "all the court plays of the period, excepting pastorals, were provided with scenery of the multiple order" (p. 235), Mr. Lawrence infers that plays must necessarily have been similarly rehearsed at the Blackfriars. Yet, as the multiple scenery was court property, return- able after the royal performance, he suggests that all subsequent representations at Black- friars would follow the practice of the public stage. Surely, it is unlikely that a particular play would be acted in the same theatre by the same company before the same type of audience in one manner previous to a specific date and in an utterly different manner after. It is not with the idea of convicting Mr. Lawrence of ignorance or carelessness that these few instances out of a large number have been brought up. The rest of the learned world shares Mr. Lawrence's uncertainties, and all writers on the subject have not been as frank as he in avowing the weak places in their reason- ing. The fact is that what we know at present of the early court, private, and public stages immediately prior to Shakespeare is quite in- sufficient to support the amount of pure conjec- ture involved in any of the prevailing theories. To concentrate upon the real fundamentals of Elizabethan staging, as manifested in the earli- est and simplest theatres, the attention now roaming rather aimlessly over the entire pre- Restoration epoch might set investigation firmly on its feet. A few careless expressions and misprints mar the neatness of Mr. Lawrence's volume. Atten- tion is likely to be drawn particularly to the amusing misuse of italic type by which the Boswell-Malone Variorum Shakespeare is reg- ularly alluded to as Malone's Shakespeare by JBoswell. Of " Shakespeare by Bacon" we have all heard more than enough, but " Shakespeare by Bos well" strikes one as a delicious innova- tion. C. F. Tucker Brooke. China After the Revolution.* Not even the new era dawning for the Balkan States is of so great moment to the human race as is the emergence of China from mediaeval backwardness into modern aspirations, and her institution of a republican government. Friends of liberty and progress everywhere will share, indeed, in the triumphs of liberty and pro- gress in southeastern Europe, and will spare but little sympathy to the losing Turk, yet the rise of the Balkan States adds no distinctly new ele- ment to world civilization. Japan, on the other hand, brought into later nineteenth-century world culture an individual contribution, not only Japanese, but Asiatic; and the great empire now following the lead of Japan will, presumably, offer to the family of nations per- plexities and gifts, not simply characteristic and unique, but also Asiatic. Since it is to be hoped that the world culture of the later twentieth century will be enriched by the equal blend- ing of elements from the two hemispheres, the revolution in China is therefore of the utmost significance. China's first steps along her present untried path are being watched by all the world, but not by all with like interest. Not even yet is the possibility of the partition of the old empire banished from the thought of certain European chancelleries, and it is scarcely cynical to believe that some of the Great Powers secretly rejoice at every sign of weakness, and regret every omen of success in her present endeavor. Whatever be the attitude of other nations, however, our own can scarcely be less than friendly. We have nothing to gain by China's failure, and much to hope from her success. Moreover, she is paying us the flattering tribute of at least partial imitation, and much of her present mo- •Sun Yat Sen and the Awakening of China. By James Cantlie, M.A., and C. Sheridan Jones. Illustrated. New York: Fleming H. Revell Co. Recent Events and Present Policies in China. By J. O. P. Bland, niustrated. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Co. The Chinese Revolution. By Arthur Judson Brown. New York: Student Volunteer Movement. 138 [Feb. 16, THE DIAL mentum in the reform movement is the result of American education imparted to her youth both here and in China. Indeed, in spite of the uncertainties that yet strew her path, many Americans marvel that our government still delays to recognize the Republic. These uncertainties are varied and serious. China consists not only of the eighteen prov- inces, but also of four great dependencies, loosely knit at best to the Middle Kingdom — a total area one-third larger than all Europe. To in- stitute a novel form of government for the hun- dreds of millions of her people and yet hold these vast dependencies to their allegiance is a task of the greatest magnitude. Even without foreign foes, it would be almost impossible ex- cept by means of a great army, and that China does not possess. Nor is she without foes. Japan covets South Manchuria; Russia is greedy for North Manchuria, Mongolia, and Turkestan; England will not stand by and see Thibet fall into Russian hands. Moreover, China is internally weak. She lacks railroads, revenue, and an army. Her administration has not yet proved its capacity for handling the vast sums needed for internal development, and she cannot, therefore, borrow money for the development of her wonderfully rich resources without submitting to foreign supervision. Such supervision may lead to riots and even the secession of provinces. At this critical juncture, when the old sanctions of Confucianism and the monarchy are destroyed, no new sanctions have been created upon which she may implicitly rely to hold her populace loyal, through severe tests, to the new govern- ment. Her internal problems accentuate the seriousness of the dangers which threaten from without. Friends of China who watch eagerly for every sign of hope will find much to encourage them and much to discourage in three recent books. The favorable view of China's prospects is pre- sented in Messrs. Cantlie and Jones's "Sun Yat Sen and the Awakening of China," and in Dr. Brown's "The Chinese Revolution"; the un- favorable in Mr. Bland's "Recent Events and Present Policies in China." The first of these books comprises a rather heterogeneous list of topics. A sketch of the character and career of Dr. Sun, together with certain other chapters, was written by Dr. Can- lie, former teacher of Dr. Sun at the Hongkong Medical School and his intimate friend for the past twenty years; the rest of the book was written by Mr. Sheridan Jones. The latter writer gives an altogether encouraging account of the great moral crusade in China, the fight against opium. The statistics advanced to prove that China has combatted the gigantic opium evil with vigor and at great sacrifice to the gov- ernment in revenue, and that British India has actually drawn a larger revenue, because of the rise in prices, from her greatly reduced export of opium, are indeed impressive. Likewise impressive is the forecast of China's future as a military power. The writer believes in the strength and efficiency of the new army of China, and maintains that the Republic will differ from the monarchy in nothing more strikingly than in the changed attitude toward the soldier, a change destined to mean eventually an enormous standing army. Will China in the near future require Japan and Russia to evacuate Man- churia? Mr. Jones believes she may. The value of Mr. Jones's prophecies depends largejy upon the quality of China's present lead- ership, and as to this both Mr. Jones and Dr. Cantlie are agreed. The former speaks with assurance of the reformed bench of China, as consisting of an "unexceptionable personnel," and Dr. Cantlie holds Sun Yat Sen up to the world as a man of unique gifts and powers. According to Dr. Cantlie's first-hand sketch, Sun possesses remarkable magnetism, both with individuals and with audiences. His temper is pacific, his disposition remarkably unselfish, his interests very diverse, and his devotion to China absolute. Interesting incidents from his pic- turesque career serve to vivify the sketch and leave a very favorable impression of Sun as a man of ability and courage and a peculiarly sin- cere patriot. His power over men, the result of an open and generous nature, appears quite extra- ordinary. As to his statesmanship, Dr. Cantlie furnishes little evidence, since in this Sun is as yet untried. One is compelled to remark, more- over, that Dr. Cantlie largely defeats his own end by a certain lack of restraint and an undue laudation of his hero. Dr. Sun as the saviour of the Republic would be more reassuring if he were depicted as not quite so angelic. This lack of restraint contrasts unfavorably with the exceptional scholarship and thorough- ness of Mr. Bland's discussion of China's prob- lems, a discussion giving an altogether adverse view of her prospects. Joint author with Mr. Backhouse of "China under the Empress Dow- ager," Mr. Bland is eminently qualified to dis- cuss the political, economic, and social conditions in the Empire, and his entire treatmentis gratify- ing in its thoroughness and acumen. The his- 1913.] THE DIAL tory of the new movement in China, the Young China party, Cantonese leadership, the policies of each of the Great Powers, international poli- tical finances,—these topics are treated with unusual ability and thoroughness of grasp. The selfish policies of European nations toward China, the shrewdness of Japan's far-seeing designs, the reckless extravagance of Russian ambition are exposed unsparingly—and, one feels, with undue pessimism. Mr. Bland has great respect for the people of China, but little respect for their leaders. His analysis of the unrest goes back to the fundamental cause,— the pressure of population on the means of sub- sistence, the philoprogenitiveness of the Chinese race; and yet, though convincing as an explana- tion of one phase of the uprising, this analysis leaves out of account secondary causes too im- portant to be omitted. He feels this to be a blind movement of the hungry masses, and in his eyes those who have taken the lead in this movement are only a new type of the ancient Chinese revolutionist, and they are already dis- playing the worst traits of the greedy mandarin. The people are in the hands of ambitious and place-seeking leaders, devoid of sobriety, and wholly wanting in moral and religious depth and restraint. He foresees a brief life for the Republic, though he thinks the restored mon- archy or the despotism sure to follow will be modified for the better through the aspirations voiced in the temporary Republic. One questions whether Mr. Bland has not been too long in close and unfortunate contact with the old Chinese officialdom to view with open mind the present seemingly novel phe- nomena in Chinese politics. No one who has any acquaintance with the younger generation of Chinese will fail to recall men whose ability and patriotism inspire great confidence. It is wholly possible that the effervescence of youth- ful enthusiasms, which to Mr. Bland indicate a heady, volatile, and unstable leadership, will leave behind the substantial Chinese virtues of common sense and reverence for law, to guide the nation through its crisis. Though possess- ing unusual value as a scholarly study, the discussion is too deeply tinged with pessimism to be convincing. Such an impression of Mr. Bland's unfavor- able prepossession is strengthened by the peru- sal of Dr. Brown's " The Chinese Revolution." After describing briefly the outbreak and back- ground of the revolution, Dr. Brown discusses concisely the various influences that have pre- pared the way for this outbreak, — steam and commerce, diplomatic and warlike relations, the gradual intellectual awakening resulting from these stimuli and from Christianity and foreign education. He concludes his study with a sketch of the two foremost leaders of China, Sun and Yuan, and a forecast of the future of the Republic. Dr. Brown's tone, though sane and not lacking reserve, is strongly optimistic. He believes that moral and spiritual elements have entered largely into the making of the present situation in China, and urges the necessity of strengthening as rapidly as possible these con- servative influences at this time of swift tran- sition from the old to the new. O. D. Wannamaker. A Library of Greek and Latin Classics.* Xenophon in his Memorabilia of Socrates reports the sage as saying that friendship is sustained and promoted by reading the master- pieces of old: "We turn over the recorded thoughts which the wise men of antiquity have left to us; and if we find any noble sentiment, we cull it out and rejoice to think that our friend- ship is strengthened thereby." Towards the close of the fifth century B. c, when Socrates may be supposed to have made this remark, the available stores of Greek literature were already sufficiently imposing. Homer and Hesiod, Archilochus and the lyric poets, the great trio of tragic dramatists, Aristophanes, the historians Herodotus and Thucydides, with others of minor note, were all in hand, and affecting the thought and life of Hellas. It was quality rather than quantity that told: little need for winnowing those treasures; and there was added the su- preme advantage of not having to translate, as nothing worth translating existed outside of Greece. For Americans and Britons of this speeding century, the treasures of Greek and Roman lit- erature, like some other fine old things, have largely become shelved and labelled. We con- tent ourselves with remembering the label and retaining a dim idea of the shelf — a somewhat different thing from talking "with one of * Thb Lokb Classical Libbasy. Edited by T. E. Page and W. H. D. Rouse. First volumes: Philostratus's Life of Apollonius of Tyana, translated by F. C. Conybeare, in two volumes; Euripides, translated by Arthur S. Way, in four volumes; Terence, translated by J. Sargeaunt, in two volumes; Propertius, translated by H. E. Butler; Catullus, Tibullus, and the Pervigilium Veneris, translated by F. W. Cornish, J. P. Postgate, and J. W. Mac kail. New York: The Macmillan Co. 140 [Feb. 16r THE DIAL, Plutarch's men." Emerson in one place con- tends for the use of translations; in another, he says: "When a thought of Plato becomes a thought to me, time is no more." To be con- sistent, he must have taken his Plato via Jowett; but as the same Emerson elsewhere pleads for inconsistency as the real jewel, we may fall back on the assurance that he got as much training in the Greek language as the early nineteenth century afforded. However this may be, it must be with some sense of interest, pleasure, and gratitude that thoughtful men up and down the land have heard of the purpose of Mr. James Loeb, the well-known banker, to stay the slow progress of oblivion that seemed waiting on the classic literatures by subsidizing the publication of translations of the great and less great Greek and Soman writers, from Homer down to the fall of Constantinople. To the undertaking of his praiseworthy enterprise Mr. Loeb was impelled by his own enthusiasm for classical subjects and the encouragement of M. Salomon Reinach; and for its supervision he has called in the aid of an advisory board, including such names as Edward M. Capps of Princeton, Will- iam G. Hale of Chicago, John Williams White of Harvard, Maurice Croiset of Paris, Otto Crusius of Munich, Hermann Diels of Berlin, J. G. Frazer of Cambridge, A. D. Godley of Oxford, and Sir J. E. Sandys. The immediate editors of the series are Dr. T. E. Page, for- merly of the Charterhouse school in London, and Dr. W. H. D. Rouse, Litt.D., of Cambridge. For the actual work of translation, the editors have enlisted the services of recognized schol- ars in England, the Continent, and America. Jowett and Jebb are gone,—so, alas, are Sey- mour and Wright and Goodwin; but from Phillimore, Way, Postgate, and Mackail in England, W. C. Wright of Bryn Mawr, A. M. Harmon of Princeton, and Horace White of New York, something more than respectable translations may be expected. It would seem, indeed, as if the work had been triply guarded, — by translators, editors, and advisory board. The series is to consist of about two hundred volumes,—somewhat more than a five-foot shelf, though not exhaustive of the available riches. In the selection of authors no chronological order will be followed, but the choice will be made so as to include considerable variety each year. Major and minor authors are brought out am- icably together, and it is left to our latter-day acumen to determine their respective merits: Sophocles is elbowed by Philostratus, Terence and the Apostolic Fathers have agreed together. Questions of Hellenism and Latinity are not discussed; yet, as the Greek or Latin text is placed on the opposite page from the translation, the scholar's eye will not fail of its critical office. The chief appeal is made, of course, not to scholars, but to the college graduate who wishes to keep up his reading, and who has forgotten much of the little Latin and more of the less Greek he once was taught; and also to the intel- ligent layman, well-intentioned but innocent of either language. This appeal is helped out by the clear printing and neat form of the small octavos. The Latin volumes are bound in red cloth and the Greek in dark green. For the Bize, the price seems a little high. Philostratus of Lemnos (circa 175—200 a.d.) gained the favor of the learned empress Julia Domna, consort of Septimius Severus, and was persuaded by her to write the life of the sage and wonder-worker Apollonius of Tyana. As Apollonius had been dead about a century, there had been time for a fine haze of legend and tradition to gather round his name. During a long life—largely peripatetic—spent in visit- ing Persia, Babylon, India, Egypt, and the Hel- lenic world generally, he wandered and preached and wrought miracles, spoke boldly before kings and emperors, narrowly escaped death from Nero and later from Domitian, and finally died peace- fully under Nerva. Philostratus is thought to have exploited the career of Apollonius as a kind of counter-blast to that of Jesus; but there seems little reason to believe this. The narrative, in eight books and broken into small chapters, is most entertaining; and suggests an Herodotus of the third Christian century, though of course lacking the historic substance. The translation,, by Mr. F. C. Conybeare, is generally spirited and good; although there are occasional infelici- ties and a few "Briticisms." For Euripides, the editors have wisely chosen to reproduce the fine verse-translation of Dr. Arthur S. Way, which has been admired by scholars and used by literary clubs for the past eighteen years. Dr. Way has thoroughly revised his former translation of the nineteen plays (he takes the "Rhesus" as genuine) with the "two especial aims of closer fidelity to the original and greater lucidity in expression." The Greek text of this edition is eclectic, being based on the soundest conclusions of previous editors and critics. The fresh virginal page is retained, with almost no footnotes on readings. In the excel- lent short introduction on Euripides, Dr. Way 1918] THE DIAL 141 gives us the following bit of comparative char- acterization: ".lEschylus sets forth the operation of great princi- ples, especially of the certainty of divine retribution and of the persistence of sin as an ineradicable plague-spot. He believes and trembles. Sophocles depicts great characters; he ignores the malevolence of destiny and the persistent power of evil; to him 1 man is man and master of his fate.' He believes with unquestioning faith. Euripides propounds great moral problems; he analyzes human nature, its instincts, its passions, its motives; he voices the cry of the human soul against the tyranny of the supernatural, the selfishness and cruelty of man, the crushing weight of environment. He questions: 'he will not make his judgment blind.'" Among the Latin authors thus far selected for translation, one volume is devoted to the elegies of Propertius, whose four books have been done into English prose by Mr. H. E. Butler, of the University of London. The work has been carefully executed, his close adhesion to the Latin text being chosen by the translator even where, in his own words, "a free paraphrase would have been in many ways preferable." A single volume, also, garners the riches of Catullus, whose 116 poems and fragments are translated by Mr. F. W. Cornish, the Vice- provost of Eton; of Tibullus, whose three books of elegiacs have found a scholarly interpreter in Professor J. P. Postgate; and of the little poem which has come down to us under the name of the Pervigilium Veneris. The two Latin poets are well known to all scholars and lovers of the genus lyricum; and it is safe to say that these two translations will widely and permanently extend the circle of their admirers. The Pervigilium, however, is a less familiar name even to the classically disposed reader. Its twenty-two quatrains, with their haunting refrain, exist in two MSS., one of the seventh, the other of the ninth century; but its original date, authorship, and provenance are alike un- known. Professor J. W. Mackail, the transla- tor, has given to the title the felicitous English equivalent "The Eve of St. Venus"; and has done for the unknown poet of the fourth century a service worthy of being compared with that of FitzGerald for Omar. Though nominally composed as an official piece for the trinoclium or popular festival of Venus, Professor Mackail finds fantasy its prevailing motive, "a summons which evokes imaginative associations, and sets the rhythm of poetry in movement round nature and history, love and life." He regards the poem as the beginning of the romantic move- ment. "All the motives of the old classical poetry survive, yet all have undergone a new birth. . . . Poetry has gone back to childhood; and has recovered, as though for one fleeting mo- ment and by the spell of a capricious enchanter, the key of spring, the freshness of morning, the innocence of youth." The opening line is used both as introduction and as refrain for the has- tening trochaic stanzas that follow; one of which, with Professor Mackail's prose-poetic version, may serve as an alluring specimen of the whole: "Cras amet qui nunquam amavit quique amavit cras amet: ver novum, ver jam canorum, ver renatus orbis est; vere concordant amores, vere nubunt alites, et nemus comam resolvit de maritis imbribus. Cras amet qui nunquam amavit quique amavit cras amet." "Tomorrow shall be love for the loveless, and for the lover tomorrow shall be love. Spring is young, spring now is singing, spring is the world reborn. In spring the loves make accord, in spring the birds mate, and the woodland looses her tresses under nuptial showers. Tomorrow shall be love for the loveless, and for the lover tomorrow shall be love." Four of the six extant plays of Terence, pro- duced in the middle of the second century B.C., were frank adaptations of the comedies of the Greek poet Menander, chief representative of the third period of Attic comedy—the "comedy of manners," which has remained to the present time the "jus et norma loquendi" of this form of drama. The translator, Mr. J. Sargeaunt, hi his introduction, defends Terence from the charge of sameness in plot and characters by the natural observation that nothing else could be expected from plays dealing with "a single epoch in a city (Athens) where life went easily and great events had ceased to occur." This recalls Mommsen's words in speaking of the New Attic comedy: "The pieces are of tiresome monotony. Almost without exception the plot turns on helping a young man, at the expense either of his father or some leno to obtain possession of a sweetheart of undoubted charms and of very doubtful morals. Love or amorous intrigue was the very life-breath of the Menandrian poetry. . . . Persons and situations recur down to the very details like patterns on a carpet; we never get rid of the asides of unseen listeners, of knocking at the house-doors, and of slaves scouring the streets on some erraud or other." The charge against Terence that he is not Plautus is also — perhaps unnecessarily — re- futed by Mr. Sargeaunt by pointing to the obvious fact that the Terentian comedy is in- tentionally sentimental, and that boisterous Plautine humor would be misplaced. He for- tifies this position by an apt reference to modern literature: "There is a likeness between Miss Bates and Mrs. Nickleby. We laugh louder at 142 [Feb. 16, THE DIAL. j , Mrs. Nickleby, but Miss Bates is more true to life." Tbe stage directions, wbich of course are wanting in the Latin original, are supplied from the copy made for the Westminster boys' plays in London, and add much to the interest and usefulness of the translation. The version does not lack sprightliness; by-words and colloquial- isms are supplied from copious modern British stores: e.g., " By Jove" for ercle, " Lor me" for ecastor, "Simple Simon " for miser, "Lord, Lord " for ei mihi, and so on. Jobiah Kenick Smith. Recent Contributions to the Liter- ature of Education.* It is worthy of remark that many persons with fine literary feeling and skill seem to approach the discussion of educational problems in a pessimistic mood. Usually they appear to be entirely out of sympathy with contemporary educational theory and practice. They praise the ideals of bygone ages; they deplore the degeneracy of the present; they prophesy disaster for the future. And still some of these writers present sane views of the educational process. All this is true of the volume entitled "A Valiant Woman." As one reads it, one is apt to feel despondent at times when the author points out what is regarded as the pathetic condition into which modern education has fallen. But at other times one feels hopeful and enthusi- astic, when the author depicts high ideals, and indi- cates what could be accomplished if we were rational and sincere in our treatment of the problems of studies, methods, and discipline. The anonymous author is apparently very well versed in educational classics, but seems to be entirely unfamiliar with present-day scientific writing on educational themes. He (or she) speaks in utter contempt of all "peda- gogy," and then goes on to quote a large part of the classic writings upon which modern "pedagogy " is founded. He condemns the study of the child mind * A Valiant Woman. A Contribution to the Educa- tional Problem. By M. F. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Co. Teaching in School and College. By William Lyon Phelps. New York: The Maomillan Co. The Normal Child and Primary Education. By Arnold L. Gesell and Beatrice Chandler Gesell. Boston: Oinn & Co. Genetic Philosophy of Education. By G. E. Part- ridge. New York: Sturgis & Walton Co. Principles of Educational Practice. By Paul Klapper. New York: D. Appleton & Co. The Evolution of Educational Theory. By John Adams. New York: The Macmillan Co. Education. A First Book. By Edward L. Thorndike. New York: The Macmillan Co. A Quarter Century of Public School Develop- ment. By W. H. Maxwell. New York: American Book Co. Better Schools. By B. C. Gregory. Edited by James L. Hughes. New York: The Maomillan Co. and of educational methods, but devotes most of the book to depicting child nature and methods of teach- ing in a keen, sane, and delightful manner. The "valiant woman" was a teacher, who early came into the life of the author. In the first chapter are depicted her characteristics and her methods in man- aging an ungraded school in a Middle Western com- munity. The author first shows that everything that had been done before her time was wrong, — the teaching was crude, formal, mechanical, verbal. But this woman introduced fresh methods. She made her work concrete and vital, so that it was attractive to the pupils. She was plain of dress and of features, but noble in intellect and magnanimous in spirit. The chief virtue of the book is that it presents sound educational principles in an unusually virile and at- tractive style. If the author had not permitted his sensibilities to be irritated by imperfections (many of them imaginary) in the world around him, and if he had been more largely constructive without decrying the tendencies of the times, his work would be signally distinguished among modern educational books. But even with its imperfections, it is a con- tribution of merit,—not because it offers anything new, but because it presents in a captivating way many of the views and principles which all present- day leaders are striving to get adopted in our educational system. Professor William Lyon Phelps, of Yale, is thor- oughly optimistic about the whole business of edu- cation. He is himself very fond of teaching. He says he would rather teach than do anything else he can think of. He derives inspiration from give- and-take experiences with his students in the class- room. Unquestionably he knows how to awaken interest in the subject he teaches—English literature — and he is never bored by the duties of the class- room. According to him, there is no dull routine in teaching when one is en rapport with subject and students. Indeed, to him there is "no profession more exciting, more stirring, more thrilling than teaching." Professor Phelps's book is considerably more intimate than the majority of works upon this subject. It is concrete, specific, and practical throughout. Many faults in teaching are indicated, but never in a mood of despair. Professor Phelps thinks that teaching to-day, in colleges especially, is very much better than it was formerly, with which opinion the reviewer heartily agrees. Persons who have not had technical training in educational sciences can read Professor Phelps's book with pleas- ure. Not having studied educational theory, the author is not tempted to use specific terms, which, while more precise than the terms of every-day speech, are nevertheless not attractive to some read- ers. There is good cause for rejoicing when a man who is master of clear and graceful English, who is genuinely honest and sincere, and who is a "born teacher," writes on the problems of the classroom; for he can appeal to the novice and to the man of the world as a student of the sciences underlying education usually cannot, because the latter con- 1913] 148 THE DIAL, stantly feels the necessity of using terms which have come to have specific meanings for those who are specialists in the fields in which he works. Mr. and Mrs. Gesell have written an interesting volume on the training of young children. The authors are scientists in the best sense of the term. They have studied biology, evolution, and modern physiological and experimental psychology. They have also dealt directly with children, and have made numerous experiments in order to throw light upon some of the complex and peculiar traits of the char- acter and abilities of children. Unlike much of the study of children of recent times, the authors have confined their attention to the normal child. This does not mean that they think it possible exactly to define a "normal" child. They do not attempt to mark off precisely the normal from other kinds of children, and it is well that they do not worry over this problem. They say that of the (approximately) 17,000,000 children in the public schools of this country, only a small percentage are in special classes for the backward and the defective, and that the rest may be considered as "normal." While this lacks precision, it is nevertheless the proper point of view to take in discussing the traits, abilities, and needs of the normal child. The book summarizes in an attractive way a considerable amount of modern science relating to child nature and child develop- ment. It is not an easy task, as anyone knows who has ever tried it, to present biological, evolutionary, and psychological sciences in dynamic and at the same time attractive English; but the authors have succeeded in this in a large measure. Teachers of young children, even those who have not had much training in the biological sciences, might read this book with genuine pleasure and certainly with profit. There are some persons who claim that they can- not easily read President G. Stanley Hall's books, because of the bigness of his words and the complex character of his sentences. For this reason, doubt- less, Mr. G. E. Partridge has thought it advisable to present his writings in a denatured form for the "average reader." President Hall has himself endorsed this enterprise, and has said that Mr. Partridge has done his work well. The latter has certainly simplified the English of the original, and has undoubtedly managed in a skilful way to give his chief's views on a great number of psychological and educational problems of present-day interest. President Hall has been a leader among educators for twenty years at least. He has discussed practi- cally every question of general educational interest during this period. He has played a very important part in initiating reforms in teaching based upon biological and psychological principles. His views have been presented in several books and in a great number of magazine articles and addresses; and it has been Mr. Partridge's work to digest all these, to get at the substance of each, and to present this sub- stance in as simple terms as he could. The book is designed for the layman, and for the novice in teach- ing who would not venture to read Hall in the orig- inal. The only fault the present reviewer can find with the book is that it seems a little monotonous; but probably this defect could not be avoided,— the author was compelled to confine himself to sum- maries and condensations. Many writers seem to find it impossible to treat the subject of education logically and comprehen- sively without being rather formal and schematic. But Professor Paul Klapper has achieved a large measure of success in avoiding this danger. He has discussed the meaning and function of education, and the physiological, sociological, intellectual, emo- tional, and volitional aspects of education as a pro- cess of perfecting adjustment to one's environment. He has produced a substantial volume, and a useful one. Its purpose is not to present new data for a science of education, but rather to organize existing data derived from the various sciences, and to show how they relate to problems of educational values and methods. This is now a favorite task of educa- tional writers; they approach their subject from the standpoint of biological, evolutionary, sociological, and psychological science. Professor Klapper re- veals a familiarity with as much of these sciences as seems to bear upon the problems of making a cur- riculum, presenting studies effectively, and organiz- ing and disciplining a school properly. In an older day, educational writers assumed that the aim of education was to impart culture to the individual, or to discipline his mental faculties, or to develop his character, or to prepare him for earning his daily bread, or otherwise. But more recently students of education have been taking the view that the chief concern of a human being is to adjust himself har- moniously to his social and physical environment, and the whole business of education is to assist him in accomplishing this in the most complete and effec- tive way possible. Professor Klapper takes this view of the educational process. But adjustment means to him not so much that the individual should adapt himself to the world as he finds it at any time or place, as that he should transform it to minister to his needs. While the book deals with rather heavy subjects, and its logical completeness may cause the novice to suspect that it is not adapted to his needs, nevertheless the principles are presented in a simple and direct way, with only slight use of technical terms. The author has a happy manner of illustrat- ing his discussions with concrete examples, which will help the general reader and the novitiate to com- prehend what is being discussed, and also to enjoy it. At the same time, the book is designed primarily for the student, the one who has leisure to study the whole subject of education, and who can do consider- able parallel reading on the side. It is essentially a text-book. References are given at the end of each chapter to the most approved literature relating to the topics considered, and there is a good index at the close. Professor John Adams has set himself a difficult task in tracing the evolution of educational theory. The purpose of Professor Klapper's book, mentioned 144 TELE: DIAL [Feb. 16, above, is to present current theory and the scientific principles upon which it is based; but Professor Adams takes us back into the ancient world, and even into pre-historic times, and shows us what the people of that remote era thought about education. His book is philosophical, not practical. He ranks education as one branch of philosophy, and he treats it as such. He has read widely in philosophical lit- erature, and he has quoted from it freely. While it is not his aim to introduce the reader to modern views in any detail, nevertheless he shows that he is in sympathy with many fundamental tendencies in con- temporary education. The various theories of educa- tion are grouped into the naturalistic, the idealistic, and the mechanistic types. While this grouping is open to criticism, it is nevertheless of service in classi- fying the great variety of theories that have been proposed by educational writers. Professor Adams endorses the naturalistic revolt against the conven- tionality and formalism which once dominated the educational world, and which still linger in some places. At the same time, he does not go to such lengths as does Rousseau in exalting Nature, mak- ing her the sole arbiter of educational curricula and methods. His book does not aim to be critical so much as descriptive, so that a great deal of material is presented without much comment. Professor Adams can, when he wishes to do so, make use of a spirited and brilliant style, as he has shown in some of his previous books. In the work before us, how- ever, he has chosen to employ a somewhat heavy style, in which technical terms are used frequently, and in which no liberties are taken with direct pre- sentation of data. It is a book for the serious-minded student of educational philosophy. The general reader and the novice will probably not bring enough to the reading of the book to find it absorbing. It will make a useful text, to be worked through rather leisurely and in a thoroughgoing manner. There are certain fundamental principles of educational aims, values, and methods which are accepted to-day by all serious students of education in America. For the most part these principles have been worked out from the standpoints of modern psy- chology, biology, and sociology. Professor Edward L. Thorndike has played an important role in the development of these elementary principles*. His approach to education has been from the standpoint of what one might call a psychological naturalist. His latest book is written from this point of view. His purpose is to discuss in the simplest way possible many of the problems in which educational people are interested to-day. He writes as one who is mas- ter of his subject, and who does not need to exhibit his learning in the use of technical terms or in a grand and formal style. The book reminds one of William James's "Talks to Teachers"; Professor Thorndike talks on education in much the same in- formal but helpful manner, so that even the novice may comprehend and enjoy what he writes. The volume is characterized not alone by simplicity, but also by a lack of positive' dogmatic statements. There are two sides to every question in modern education. As a rule, Professor Thorndike presents in brief the arguments on both sides, and then suggests what is probably the right attitude for the teacher to take. The teacher who appropriates the contents of this book will understand modern tendencies in educa- tional theory and practice, but he will not be too dogmatic in his beliefs. Recently Mr. William H. Maxwell of New York celebrated the twenty-fifth anniversary of his work as a superintendent. In commemoration of this event, a committee collected and edited a large num- ber of his reports and addresses, and these are now published in book form. They indicate the prom- inent part Mr. Maxwell has played in the improve- ments which have been introduced into the public school system of America during the last quarter of a century. They deal with a great variety of inter- esting and important topics. The hand of the practi- cal superintendent is apparent .in them all. He has been charged with tremendous responsibilities in ad- ministering great systems of schools, first in Brooklyn and afterward in Greater New York. But while primarily an administrator, he has also been a stu- dent of educational principles and educational pro- gress. "A Quarter Century of Public School Devel- opment" is practically a rtsumk of what has been accomplished in the schools of America during the past twenty-five years. Mr. Maxwell has been on the firing line all the time. He is a progressive who has been compelled to lead a great community to see the necessity for educational reform, and to make such reform feasible in an exceedingly complicated system of schools. This book will be illuminating to the layman who has not kept in touch with edu- cational development during the past quarter of a century, and it will also be of interest to teachers who are not familiar with the reforms wrought in school work during the past twenty-five years. Like the preceding book, Mr. B. C. Gregory's "Better Schools " is written from the point of view of the superintendent who is charged with adminis- tering a system of schools, and who is concerned solely with securing definite results from the teach- ing. The seventeen chapters in this book originally appeared in whole or in part as letters written for a newspaper in the city in which Mr. Gregory was chief educational officer. The purpose of these letters is to interpret the aims and methods of the public schools for the people of the community, and so the volume is unusually direct, concrete, and prac- tical. Mr. Gregory attempts to justify the up-to- date curriculum of the elementary schools, and the means and methods of presenting studies to children of different ages. The principles underlying his curriculum and his methods are not essentially differ- ent from those presented in the books by Professor Thorndike, Professor Partridge, Professor Klapper, Professor Adams, and Professor and Mrs. Gesell. Mr. Gregory presents his views for the most part in clear, intelligible, and attractive English. M. V. O'Shka. 1913] 145 THE DIAL Briefs on New Books. Chapter,trom A warm appreciation of the noble the romance work done by our great inventors, of invention. an