


































Digital Literature Review Issue 6 Spring 2019


ABSTRACT

32

By Ben Sapet

Ayn Rand's Utopian Visions 
in Theory and Realization

Ayn Rand sought to reframe the world around a distinctly utopian sense of domineering 

individualism. Her philosophy vilified altruism and extolled selfishness in the name of her human 

ideal. With its unwavering faith in the free market and adoration of industrial magnates, Rand’s 

often problematic philosophy has gone on to shape American economic and political models. This 

essay explores how Rand’s philosophy manifested in her fiction and, in turn, in American culture. 



33

SAPET

 To seriously study Ayn Rand is a political, often taboo, act. Philosophers rarely take time to 

refute her ideas and critics rarely analyze her work. Perhaps rightly, there is a certain stigma attached 

to Rand scholarship. That stigma comes from the idea that, regardless of the scholar’s stance, bringing 

Rand into critical conversation condones her philosophy by legitimizing it. This reservation comes, in 

part, from a fear of being associated with Rand’s fervid defenders and from the iconoclastic power of 

her ideas.

 Ayn Rand wrote in the tradition of philosophical fiction, also known as the novel of ideas. In 

philosophical fiction, authors use storytelling rather than discursive philosophy to convey an ideology 

or a way of seeing the world. Rand’s novels The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged follow this 

convention as they seek to situate and demonstrate a guiding ethic for the world. Rand’s ethic came to 

be known as Objectivism. At its core, Objectivism sought to re-center philosophy and policy around 

the individual—the antithesis to the collectivist movements she saw forming around the world. 

 These ideas took hold in the contemporary American society as they interwove with the 

national myths of meritocracy, earning one’s place, and rugged individualism. Not only do Rand and 

her philosophy maintain a devout following, but her books continue to sell extraordinarily well and 

spread to new audiences. As Rand’s ideas merged with conservatism in the Reagan era and more 

recently with the Tea Party movement, her philosophy has come “to live just as much in the real world 

as in her fictional worlds.” Analyzing Rand’s ideas and methods through the lens of utopian thinking 

offers insights as to how her utopian view of America inspired conservative-libertarian economic and 

political movements with far-reaching influence. Studying the appeal of these guiding utopian ethics 

and ideals offers an opportunity to study how they have been realized and systematized.

 Writing in such a contentious area, I (like many others who write about Rand) feel it’s best 

that I acknowledge my personal stance. I find her beliefs—in unfettered, laissez-faire capitalism, 

and placing the self above others—problematic and often destructive. At the same time, however, 

these beliefs have a distinct power—especially given her ability to situate them in vivid fictional, 

utopian/dystopian worlds and characters. As her ideas have leaked out from static literary worlds and 

nonfiction essays into real-world policy and attitudes, scholars have a profound opportunity to better 

understand the now foundational political and economic beliefs of the modern world by studying 



34

SAPET

Rand and her impact.

WHAT IS OBJECTIVISM?
 Rand grounded her philosophy in the idea that an objective reality carries on apart from 

human consciousness—hence the name, “Objectivism.” Given this reality, Rand places the onus of 

pursuing knowledge and satisfaction on humans. She lionizes this pursuit alongside humans with the 

hunger to take what they want from that reality. In that sense, Rand divides people into the earned 

and unearned, the creators and consumers. As they appear in her literature, the “earned” are often the 

titans of industry who take what they want and innovate to get there. These movers and shakers are 

what we might call “the one-percent,” the ones whose relentless self-interest leads them to innovate 

and shape the landscape of reality. Rand’s first major novel, The Fountainhead, depicts the struggle 

of an ambitious architect whose innovative designs draw the ire of critics, writers, publishers, and 

other architects who disparage the change. The hero-protagonist, Howard Roark, must resist the 

overwhelming pressures of conformity and push back against this “unearned” established mindset to 

make his mark on reality. For Rand, the “unearned” are those who leech off others’ innovation and 

progress. Relying on others to prop oneself up is a cardinal sin in Objectivism. Rand identifies and 

detests the sort of passiveness of every day monotonous life. The heroes are those who bend reality 

around themselves, while the villains are the majority who coast through that reality untroubled by 

the valiant efforts of those who create.

 Alongside self-interest and taking lies the Randian value of creation. With the Objectivist view 

of an immutable reality lies the foundation for those “earned” and “unearned” in terms of how they 

relate to that reality, whether they are a participant in it who makes their mark or a person buffeted 

by that reality. She sees the ultimate human heroism as creating and negotiating the trappings of that 

reality. As an author, Rand follows this spirit of creativity and negotiation in her work. Existing social 

structures, such as socialism and religion, that oppose her view of human nature become targets in 

fiction. She seeks to advance her own philosophy while breaking down collectivism and the “flock” 

mentality. To do this, she opts to create utopian worlds conceived of as an idealized conflict between 

her heroic innovators and the sheep who follow in tow.

 



35

SAPET

The worlds in Rand’s works of fiction serve to establish her philosophy in the context of imagined, 

exaggerated worlds where character tension and ideological clashes are elevated to a dramatic, world-

shaking level. Rand creates some of this tension by placing utopia inside and alongside dystopia, such 

as capitalist havens inside increasingly collectivist societies. The utopian communities are treated as 

the last bastion of human heroism in the face of systems and trends that lead people to a passive life of 

impeding progress. This stands in stark contrast to many dystopias in which progress and the people 

who strive for it are the ones who endanger society. Like many utopian thinkers, Rand’s utopian 

leanings center on idolizing an extreme reversal of the status quo. For Rand, that extreme reversal 

involves shedding the government incentives and nationwide social programs that characterized the 

American government in the 1940s and 50s. She saw taxation to benefit society as theft that facilitated 

leeching from the most productive members of society. With the looming growth of socialism and 

communism, Rand’s utopias sought to reinforce the promises of capitalism and the American ideals 

that brought her to America from her native Russia.

 UTOPIA IN RAND'S LITERATURE
 Rand’s first mainstream novel, The Fountainhead, reflects the early stages of Objectivism. It 

focuses on her ethic of heroic creativity in the face of an objective reality populated by collectivists, 

who push down individualism in favor of unchallenging mediocrity. This focus on individualism and 

ferocious creativity came to Rand after spending fifteen years in the United States, a country with 

values and systems that aligned with her ambition and iconoclastic thinking. Given her exposure to 

freedom and the opportunity to pursue her desire, she explores the motivation to do so and separate 

oneself from “the masses.” In his essay “The Basic Motivation of the Creators and the Masses in The 

Fountainhead,” Onkar Ghate (a member of the Ayn Rand Institute) articulates the kind of motivation 

Rand sees guiding the metaphorical architects of her utopia:

 The root is that Roark’s basic motivation in life is completely unconcerned with and unaffected

 by other people. His goal and his pursuit of it are purely independent and selfish…Roark’s goal

 is to build. He wants to transform, for himself, the earth into his vision of a more uplifting, 

 more human place. This desire would remain even on a desert island; only its implementation

 

 



36

SAPET

 would change: he would not build gas stations or skyscrapers but, say, a hut or a cabin (245).

Through Roark, her model of the ideal creative spirit, Rand aligns her utopian vision of the creative 

spirit with a state of internal, deeply resolute motivation. Traditionally utopias are considered 

imagined ideal communities, but Rand’s creative ideal is a solitary state of mind unburdened by 

others’ expectations.

 Atlas Shrugged, Rand’s next novel (released in 1957), continues to push on the utopian 

creative solitude of her heroes but introduces higher stakes as those internal utopian states of 

mind clash with a world leaning toward a dystopia for thinkers like Rand and her characters. The 

premise of Atlas Shrugged is that the world’s tide shifts in the direction of nationalizing industry and 

redistributing wealth—a trend no doubt inspired by the spread of socialism and communism in the 

1950s. As protagonist and railroad tycoon Dagny Taggart watches the mines becoming nationalized 

and innovative inventions destroyed, the world’s moguls and innovators begin to vanish. Taggart 

continues resisting collectivization until she receives an invitation from the mysterious John Galt, a 

pioneer of individualism and reason, who has been persuading innovators to go on strike. Taggart 

joins Galt and the major composers, inventors, and industrialists in their utopian colony, watching 

as the collectivists languish and flail without guidance from the Randian-capitalist heroes. While The 

Fountainhead addresses the world and the masses in terms of a hypothetical, stiflingly mediocre 

form of groupthinking, the world of Atlas Shrugged places her philosophy and her heroes solidly in a 

context akin to her experience as a member of the Russian bourgeoisie, where the Bolsheviks’ utopian, 

collectivist goals spelled dystopia and ruin for her family. Every detail through the eyes of the main 

character, Dagny Taggart, paints the dystopian world as one fading to gray with only echoes of the 

innovators who once shaped the world. 

 Once Dagny is accepted to join Galt’s Gulch, the self-sustained, laissez-faire utopia to which 

all the innovators have disappeared, she and the reader are introduced to the book’s essence, an 

enormous 30,000-word speech by John Glad, spoken almost directly to the reader, about what would 

formally become Objectivism.

 In the extensive, exploratory biography, Ayn Rand and the Worlds She Made, Anne Heller 

recounts a story from the editing process for Atlas Shrugged:



37

SAPET

 Pursuing what he thought was his editorial duty, [her editor], too, suggested a number of cuts, 

 including cuts in John Galt’s speech. When Rand refused, he appealed to Bennett Cerf [the 

 firm’s founding editor]. The high-spirited founding editor met with the author. “Nobody’s

  going to read that,” he told her. “You’ve said it all three or four times before…You’ve got to cut

  it.” Answering with a comment that became publishing legend, she said, “Would you cut the

  Bible?” (282)

Like many others, Rand saw Atlas Shrugged as her magnum opus, but it was also much more than a 

work of literature to her. It was written as a living narrative of her philosophy, one in which the highs 

of her utopian visions could be realized and her brushes with dystopian Soviet collectivism could be 

weaponized in favor of her ideal brand of individualism and capitalism. Galt’s speech, specifically, 

served a sort of Objectivist Manifesto, with decrees of radical individualism and rationality such as the 

following:

 The most depraved sentence you can now utter is to ask: Whose reason? The answer is: Yours.

  No matter how vast your knowledge or how modest, it is your own mind that has to acquire

  it. It is only with your own knowledge that you can deal. It is only your own knowledge that

  you can claim to possess or ask others to consider. Your mind is your only judge of truth—and

  if others dissent from your verdict, reality is the court of final appeal. Nothing but a man’s

  mind can perform that complex, delicate, crucial process of identification which is thinking.

  Nothing can direct the process but his own judgment. Nothing can direct his judgment but his

  moral integrity. (Rand, Atlas Shrugged 935)

As a sum of her experience and philosophy and as an ode to the industrious spirits of her father and 

grandfather, Atlas Shrugged is inseparable from its author. Rand and Atlas Shrugged mirror one 

another as Rand’s striving to articulate a utopian state of being was, itself, living by that utopian ethic.

MANIFESTING THIS UTOPIAN THOUGHT
 At the center of her narratives, Rand saw an ultimate purpose of worshipping the heroic ideal 

of man. That is, someone who embodies her ethics of internal motivation, unbridled creativity, and 

ruthless pursuit of his goals. Rand’s goal, then, is to create a path to living like the ideal by first 



38

SAPET

espousing it in her fiction. Many religious texts use the life and teachings of a central figure to model 

an ideal path and inspire a change in individuals’ values—the Buddha and Jesus are good examples 

of such figures. Rand essentially uses that same, demonstrably powerful technique to present an 

antithesis to the messages of humility and altruism in these religious texts. Rand’s ideal resonated 

enough to elevate her to a sort of guru at the head of a movement. Her often conservative, libertarian 

followers clamored for her treatises on the value of selfishness and evils of living for others. In 

placing utopian ideals on the individual in her fiction, she created a space for a “movement of 

individuals,” itself a real-life utopian thought community, one that has grown over time and even been 

institutionalized with the Ayn Rand Institute and other, similar endeavors.

 Even with the formal establishments to advance it, Objectivism first gained most of its converts 

and influence through Rand’s novels. Despite its impact on the spread of her ideology, Rand had 

decidedly mixed and sometimes contradictory thoughts on the persuasive powers of literature. In 

her fiction, Rand often depicts literature as a tool to manipulate the weak-minded. She addresses 

this specifically in the critically-celebrated, yet unpopular author, Lois Cook from The Fountainhead. 

Cook’s work, and literature in general, is hardly on Randian protagonist Howard Roark’s radar: 

he is the self-driven man with little need for the outside guidance of literature. On the other hand, 

Peter Keating, one of Roark’s dull, unambitious contemporaries, loves Cook’s work precisely because 

he does not understand it: simply absorbing it makes him feel superior to others. To Rand,  such 

literature written and read in bad faith; and the “it was profound, because he didn’t understand it” 

attitude relies on a mutualistic relationship in which little-to-no meaning is made (qtd. in Brühwiler 

6). The author earns praise by instilling in the reader a sense of inferiority and the reader feels unduly 

enlightened. 

 Rand levies a similar criticism against “propagandist” literature in support of socialist regimes 

portrayed in her fiction. According to political scientist Claudia Brühwiler, “The Communist regime,  

as Rand depicts it, obviously subscribes to the idea of literature’s transformative power; otherwise, 

it would not censor individualistic novels and promote tales acting out Marxist clichés” (Walker 

5). Rand derides “regime literature” for its use of hammy tragedy and unilateral thinking to create 

scenarios in which capitalists are unquestionably evil and, in turn, agitate the people against them.



39

SAPET

At the same time, however, Rand’s literature champions the individual just as unambiguously as those 

communist tales of “a poor, honest worker” battered by capitalism. Her utopias are almost entirely 

black-and-white. The heroes are the earned, individualistic creators and the villains are unearned 

moochers and collectivists of the masses. Rand’s interpretation of Aristotle’s Poetics is telling of her 

own approach to persuasive literature: “Aristotle argues that ‘fiction was more important than history’ 

since fiction presents things ‘as they might be and ought to be’” (Podritske and Schwartz 128). Rand 

uses wholly unambiguous worlds and characters to create the illusion that her utopia (whether it 

is a state of being or a world of laissez-faire capitalism) can be the only real option. As she divides, 

categorizes, and judges what ought to be (much like Aristotle), she makes truth claims that appeal 

only to one side of rationality, calling a different (probably equally rational) approach unfair and 

irrational.

 This unambiguous thinking carries a definite allure: one can simply defer to the richly 

depicted truth in the novel. Brühwiler describes Rand’s ideal role for readers, saying they “should not 

surrender to a plot and its heroines, but rather find a means to express themselves and resist whatever 

might lead them astray” (9). The critics and scholars who did express themselves and resist her sway 

were Rand’s enemies because they subscribed to “non-Objectivist thought.” Meanwhile her other 

enemies, the passive readers who came with the sweeping popularity of her fiction, would go on—in 

the spirit of deference to a powerful idea—to bring her utopian worlds into the real one. The paradox 

of Rand’s utopian manifestations lies in the way the conquering power of her ideas creates devotees 

who, by becoming followers, immediately break with the spirit of Rand’s utopian individualism. With 

her literature, Rand attempted to manifest a utopian ethic that would oppose a status quo she felt had 

harmed her. Despite her fervent defenses stating otherwise, she dealt in the methods of conversion 

she sought to diagnose—those with the black-and-white, see-the-world-through-my-fictional-one 

types of literature used in the religious and collectivist movements she so opposed.

 The conquering power of Rand’s fiction is best embodied by a scene from her own fiction. 

Rand’s heroine Dominque Francon is perpetually downtrodden by seeing evil, anti-Objectivist people 

of the world win out over the heroes who earn their place. When she first sees Howard Roark—the 

rugged Randian hero of the story—she describes him as “the abstraction of strength made visible,”



40

SAPET

before beginning her assertive days-long effort to seduce him (Rand, The Fountainhead, 247). 

Then, in one of the most notorious moments in The Fountainhead, Howard, after having learned 

of her desire, comes in uninvited and rapes her, despite her attempts to resist. Rand’s camp often 

describes this scene as a forceful realization of her unconscious desire to be conquered by powerful 

individualism (Mayhew 206). Setting aside the horrible implications and rape apologetics involved in 

this interpretation, it offers an insight into the Randian view of their own Objectivist philosophy: that 

the beginning of a journey toward becoming a true individual starts with encountering the dominating 

force of an individual who lives for himself and is prepared to take what he wants.

 Rand and her utopian heroes strive to act as that dominating force and, in large part, they 

have. Politicians and economists have gobbled up her works, finding affirmation and a guiding ethic 

for their conservative and libertarian views—and, in turn, cementing Rand’s utopian narratives into 

crucial discussions about social security, welfare, and American capitalism as a whole. In a sense, 

Rand’s unambiguous, convincing narratives of individualism and opportunity to stand out and 

earn one’s place in the world helped systematize and engrain the very myths that drew her to the 

United States. In a 1991 Library of Congress survey, Americans named Atlas Shrugged the second 

most influential book in their lives, with the first being the Bible (Heller xii). We see the power of 

her utopian vision carry on today in an America in which billionaire moguls and the top one percent 

of society have been moralized to the point that one has been elected president. Her work’s legacy 

carries on with continued high readership and a playing field of modern politics and economics run 

by people who look to Rand’s ideal men as inspiration. As her legacy continues to stretch and become 

entrenched in American systems, looking to the utopian foundations of her thinking presents a 

distinct opportunity to unpack the motivations behind decades of Rand-inspired anti-socialist stigma, 

Reaganomics, Tea Party conservatism, and unwavering faith in capitalism.



41

WORKS CITED

Brühwiler, Claudia. “‘Prospector and Jeweler’: Ayn Rand on the Relationship between Politics and 

 Literature.” Journal of American Studies, vol. 49, no. 1, Feb. 2015, pp. 143–158. EBSCOhost, 

 doi:10.1017/S0021875814001820.

Ghate, Onkar. “The Basic Motivation of the Creators and the Masses in The Fountainhead.” Essays on

  Ayn Rand’s The Fountainhead, edited by Robert Mayhew, Lexington Books, 2007. 

Heller, Anne. Ayn Rand and the World She Made. Random House, 2009.

Podritske, Marlene & Schwartz, Peter, editors. Objectively Speaking: Ayn Rand Interviewed.

  Lexington Books, 2009. 

Rand, Ayn. Atlas Shrugged. 1957. Penguin Group, 1992.

Rand, Ayn. The Fountainhead. 1943. Signet, 1996.

Walker, Jeff. The Ayn Rand Cult. Open Court Publishing, 1999.

WORKS CONSULTED

Bell-Villada, Gene H. “Who Was Ayn Rand?” Salmagundi, no. 141/142, 2004, pp. 227–242. 

 JSTOR,  www.jstor.org/stable/40549561.

Clardy, Alan. “Galt's Gulch: Ayn Rand's Utopian Delusion.” Utopian Studies, vol. 23, no. 1, 2012, 

 pp. 238–262. JSTOR,  www.jstor.org/stable/10.5325/utopianstudies.23.1.0238.

Hull, Gary, editor. The Ayn Rand Reader. Penguin Books, 1999. 

Machan, Tibor. Ayn Rand. Peter Lang Publishing, 1999.    

SAPET


